EP2910865B1 - System amd method for controlling a fan insufflating ait into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes - Google Patents
System amd method for controlling a fan insufflating ait into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2910865B1 EP2910865B1 EP14461509.3A EP14461509A EP2910865B1 EP 2910865 B1 EP2910865 B1 EP 2910865B1 EP 14461509 A EP14461509 A EP 14461509A EP 2910865 B1 EP2910865 B1 EP 2910865B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- fan
- inverter
- protected space
- controller
- controlling
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F11/00—Control or safety arrangements
- F24F11/30—Control or safety arrangements for purposes related to the operation of the system, e.g. for safety or monitoring
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F11/00—Control or safety arrangements
- F24F11/0001—Control or safety arrangements for ventilation
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F11/00—Control or safety arrangements
- F24F11/30—Control or safety arrangements for purposes related to the operation of the system, e.g. for safety or monitoring
- F24F11/32—Responding to malfunctions or emergencies
- F24F11/33—Responding to malfunctions or emergencies to fire, excessive heat or smoke
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F11/00—Control or safety arrangements
- F24F11/62—Control or safety arrangements characterised by the type of control or by internal processing, e.g. using fuzzy logic, adaptive control or estimation of values
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F11/00—Control or safety arrangements
- F24F11/62—Control or safety arrangements characterised by the type of control or by internal processing, e.g. using fuzzy logic, adaptive control or estimation of values
- F24F11/63—Electronic processing
- F24F11/64—Electronic processing using pre-stored data
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F11/00—Control or safety arrangements
- F24F11/70—Control systems characterised by their outputs; Constructional details thereof
- F24F11/72—Control systems characterised by their outputs; Constructional details thereof for controlling the supply of treated air, e.g. its pressure
- F24F11/74—Control systems characterised by their outputs; Constructional details thereof for controlling the supply of treated air, e.g. its pressure for controlling air flow rate or air velocity
- F24F11/77—Control systems characterised by their outputs; Constructional details thereof for controlling the supply of treated air, e.g. its pressure for controlling air flow rate or air velocity by controlling the speed of ventilators
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F11/00—Control or safety arrangements
- F24F11/50—Control or safety arrangements characterised by user interfaces or communication
- F24F11/61—Control or safety arrangements characterised by user interfaces or communication using timers
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24F—AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
- F24F2110/00—Control inputs relating to air properties
- F24F2110/40—Pressure, e.g. wind pressure
Definitions
- the invention relates to an active system and method for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, by differentiating pressures.
- a particularly serious threat is posed by toxic combustion products, such as: carbon monoxide, gaseous hydrochloric acid HCl, hydrocyanic acid or sulphur compounds, which constitute a high share of fire gases.
- carbon monoxide is poisonous because when in contact with blood, it binds to the blood pigment - haemoglobin, with which it has 200-240 times higher affinity than oxygen.
- This is a durable, coordinate binding of carbon monoxide with iron atoms of haemoglobin, the binding, as a consequence, preventing the natural reaction of haemoglobin with oxygen. Impact of carbon monoxide on people is multiplied due to the phenomenon of hyperventilation, i.e.
- the ventilation system in multi-storey buildings has to provide two (steady) stable states.
- Fire ventilation systems currently in use are divided into passive and active ones.
- An attempt to solve the problem of fire ventilation involves passive, mechanical systems for removing smoke and for maintaining the escape routes free from smoke.
- a fan inflating clean air with a constant flow rate is placed so as to meet the criterion of flow in the open door, and in the upper part, a smoke release vent with a weight selected so as it opens, for example, at an overpressure of 50 Pa, is placed.
- the active systems are built as automatic control systems with the use of PID controllers.
- a sensor for sensing pressure in the protected space is connected to the PID controller. Based on the measurement, the controller determines the required power of the fan and, in the form of a voltage signal or through a serial transmission link, transmits it to an inverter (frequency converter) which directly controls the fan motor.
- This application relates to an active system.
- the only solution is to suppress the controller, i.e. to select the settings so that it reacts very slowly, but then it is not possible to achieve the transition period of less than three seconds.
- the use of PID control is therefore not possible for two reasons: firstly, a high non-linearity of the controlled facility, secondly, the facility is non-stationary: its characteristics change over time.
- the most important parameters which change over time include: leakage, air density and wind strength and direction. Change in leakage causes a complete change of air distribution in the building, which is also affected by the strength and direction of the wind: air can be forced into the interior, for example, through ventilation holes.
- non-linear model requires a solution of non-linear optimisation task with restrictions (of control, i.e. the range of possible frequencies of the inverter is restricted to the range of 0 - 50[Hz], or 0 - 60[Hz]).
- restrictions of control, i.e. the range of possible frequencies of the inverter is restricted to the range of 0 - 50[Hz], or 0 - 60[Hz].
- Such a task has not any solutions in the general case, and iterative methods require very high computational power of the processor and have an indefinite time to reach the solution, thus the cannot be used in real time for very dynamic (rapidly changing) processes. This is confirmed by literature on the subject: predictive algorithms with solution of optimisation task are currently used mainly in the chemical industry for slowly changing processes.
- EP 2345485 is the prior art closest to the subject-matter of claim 1, and discloses a system for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of said fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure, wherein said controller is configured and programmed to perform the following steps:
- a key element of the invention is a pressure controller together with a sensor (measurement of the pressure difference between the protected space and a reference pressure, e.g. atmospheric pressure).
- the controller is equipped with a processor with a high computational efficiency, equipped with floating-point arithmetic (high precision of calculations).
- the present inventors have surprisingly noted that the model of controlled process can be divided into two components: a static part describing the steady state and a dynamic part describing unsteady states.
- the essence of the invention consists in the fact that the static part of the model describes, in its entirety, hydraulic properties of the facility (leakage, current efficiency of the fan), whereas the dynamic part describes characteristics of the fan itself: motor dynamics and aerodynamic characteristics of the fan blades.
- the dynamic part is constant and the (non-linear) dynamics model is created on the basis of identification tests of a particular fan at the place of manufacture.
- This non-linear dynamics model is permanently inscribed in the controller.
- This process performed with a period of controller intervention provides current non-linear model to the rest of the algorithm, the task of the said rest being to find an optimal trajectory of the control, i.e. control values for subsequent moments of time: current moment k, and subsequent ones k+1, k+2, k+3,...
- iterative methods are used, the said methods not guaranteeing to achieve a global solution within the required short time.
- Another element of the invention is a method for quickly solving the task of non-linear optimisation, used in the invention.
- the so determined point in the control space is in close proximity to the optimum solution (global minimum of the task of non-linear optimisation). Therefore, the feasible point of the task of non-linear optimisation is a predicted control trajectory for the steady state, determined as a result of identification of parameter a. This guarantees the convergence of the optimisation task and achieving the solution within the required short time.
- the object of the invention is a system for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of this fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure (reference pressure may be atmospheric pressure or pressure from the room in which a fire can potentially start), characterised in that the said controller is configured and programmed to perform the following steps:
- the object of the invention is also a method for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, consisting in that in a system comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of this fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure, the following steps are performed:
- Fig. 2 shows a model of a controlled process with a division into static part A and dynamic part B (Wiener-Hammerstein model), where the input parameter is U(k) - control at moment k and P(k) - pressure difference measured at moment k.
- Fig. 5 shows an actual graph of inverter control U as a function of time (vertical axis on the right, [Hz]) in the stairway 5 with a presented response of the algorithm to opening and closing the door.
- a graph of pressure measured by the sensor 1 as a function of time (vertical axis on the left, [Pa]) is also shown.
- Values of control U achieved by the inverter vary in the range of 0[Hz] to 50[Hz] (control range of the inverter).
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Fuzzy Systems (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Control Of Positive-Displacement Air Blowers (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to an active system and method for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, by differentiating pressures.
- In buildings where people are present (residential or public utility buildings), conditions for safe evacuation of people during a fire have to be ensured, and appropriate conditions for rescue teams after the evacuation have to be created. The concept of safe evacuation should be understood as maintenance of vertical and horizontal escape routes free from smoke and organised reception of smoke from this space of the building. This is an issue of crucial importance to safety of users of the facility because, as analyses of effects of fires clearly indicate, smoke (mixture of gaseous combustion products with air) is the primary threat to their lives. Smoke accompanies all fires, limiting visibility in escape routes, and poses a very serious risk of intoxication to people who remain in the facility. A particularly serious threat is posed by toxic combustion products, such as: carbon monoxide, gaseous hydrochloric acid HCl, hydrocyanic acid or sulphur compounds, which constitute a high share of fire gases. For example, carbon monoxide is poisonous because when in contact with blood, it binds to the blood pigment - haemoglobin, with which it has 200-240 times higher affinity than oxygen. This is a durable, coordinate binding of carbon monoxide with iron atoms of haemoglobin, the binding, as a consequence, preventing the natural reaction of haemoglobin with oxygen. Impact of carbon monoxide on people is multiplied due to the phenomenon of hyperventilation, i.e. an increased respiration rate, which causes rapid accumulation of carbon monoxide in the organism. Figuratively speaking, two breaths in a smoky space cause loss of consciousness and, consequently, threaten with death. The above discussed threats to life are of particular importance in multi-storey buildings where evacuation of people is carried out through corridors, elevators and stairways. With relatively low heights of stories, large amounts of smoke, generated during a fire, in a short time fill the entire cubature of the room on the storey and in the absence of appropriate technical safeguards they can rapidly threaten not only the evacuation of the directly threatened storey, but also of other users of the building.
- The ventilation system in multi-storey buildings has to provide two (steady) stable states. The first: all the doors leading to the protected space (e.g. a stairway) are closed: overpressure of a fixed value (selected from the range of 30 Pa to 80 Pa, most often 50 Pa) has to be ensured. The second: at least one door is opened, e.g. from the fire involved corridor to the stairway, the fan insufflating air into the protected space needs to increase its flow rate so as to ensure air speed in the door opening at a specified level (e.g. 1 m/s or 2 m/s). To ensure an acceptable level of protection, transitional period between these two states should not last longer than three seconds.
- Fire ventilation systems currently in use are divided into passive and active ones. An attempt to solve the problem of fire ventilation involves passive, mechanical systems for removing smoke and for maintaining the escape routes free from smoke. In the lower part of the stairway, a fan inflating clean air with a constant flow rate is placed so as to meet the criterion of flow in the open door, and in the upper part, a smoke release vent with a weight selected so as it opens, for example, at an overpressure of 50 Pa, is placed. The active systems are built as automatic control systems with the use of PID controllers. A sensor for sensing pressure in the protected space is connected to the PID controller. Based on the measurement, the controller determines the required power of the fan and, in the form of a voltage signal or through a serial transmission link, transmits it to an inverter (frequency converter) which directly controls the fan motor. This application relates to an active system.
- In the prior art, there is a number of passive solutions which relate to the control of fan operation based on the measurement of pressure difference between the protected/insulated space and a reference pressure, and which maintain a constant pressure difference. Exemplary solutions are disclosed in the following publications:
KR 100317243 B1 DE 19937532 A1 ,DE 10241625 A1 ,CN 203024345 U ,JP 2007/024469 A - In the prior art, there are solutions which relate to the control of fan operation (not only in the fire ventilation system) for obtaining an expected pressure difference, on the basis of indications of temperature values inside and outside the building. For example, publications
JP 2005/207674 A US 2012/0164930 A1 andJPH 07139775 A PL 389314 A1 - In publications
EP 2511617 A1 ,EP 1990584 A1 ,EP 0915300 A2 andWO 2007/127897 A2 , solutions disclosing a method for controlling air flow by controlling the fan operation are shown. In particular, publicationEP 0915300 A2 discloses a method for controlling pressure, according to which, based on an established mathematical model, predicted settings are calculated. Forecasts are adjusted on an ongoing basis. A similar solution was described in publicationWO 2007/127897 A2 . The invention relates to an adaptive feedback algorithm (e.g. PID) which is used in a controller of fluid flow. A disadvantage of these solutions is that active systems equipped with a PID controller can operate properly only in facilities with a constant and large leakage. In real facilities, changes in leakage may be sudden (e.g. breaking of window pane) or smooth (e.g. operation of a door closer on a storey not covered by fire). Large leakage means that in the closed state of the door, the fan has a large flow rate, i.e. there is a small change in leakage between the two operational states, and the facility can be approximated by a linear model, which allows selection of appropriate settings for the PID controller. If the leakage is small, and this is the case in the newly constructed buildings, the range of variability in leakage is large, the system is highly non-linear and the PID controller becomes unstable: in the system, there are strong oscillations, i.e. the fan cyclically accelerates to the maximum flow rate, then decelerates to zero, etc. The only solution is to suppress the controller, i.e. to select the settings so that it reacts very slowly, but then it is not possible to achieve the transition period of less than three seconds. The use of PID control is therefore not possible for two reasons: firstly, a high non-linearity of the controlled facility, secondly, the facility is non-stationary: its characteristics change over time. The most important parameters which change over time include: leakage, air density and wind strength and direction. Change in leakage causes a complete change of air distribution in the building, which is also affected by the strength and direction of the wind: air can be forced into the interior, for example, through ventilation holes. An important parameter is air density (which depends on atmospheric pressure, temperature and humidity) because Reynolds number depends on density, and change in this number affects the effective flow rate of the fan. Therefore, the use of advanced control algorithms, e.g. predictive ones, seems to be the natural way. Unfortunately, all control algorithms require a mathematical model of the facility. The facility is non-stationary so this model has to be created on an ongoing basis and very quickly because control variables are rapidly changing, according to the control theory at least 20 times per second. The facility is highly non-linear: e.g. function describing the flow rate of the fan, according the frequency of the inverter, is non-linear and depends on the variable parameters of air (Reynolds number). Further, the non-linear model requires a solution of non-linear optimisation task with restrictions (of control, i.e. the range of possible frequencies of the inverter is restricted to the range of 0 - 50[Hz], or 0 - 60[Hz]). Such a task has not any solutions in the general case, and iterative methods require very high computational power of the processor and have an indefinite time to reach the solution, thus the cannot be used in real time for very dynamic (rapidly changing) processes. This is confirmed by literature on the subject: predictive algorithms with solution of optimisation task are currently used mainly in the chemical industry for slowly changing processes. -
EP 2345485 is the prior art closest to the subject-matter of claim 1, and discloses a system for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of said fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure, wherein said controller is configured and programmed to perform the following steps: - a) registering, in the memory of the controller, parameters of the fan, determined in time, comprising at least: determination of operation dynamics of the fan, especially acceleration time of the fan, deceleration time of the fan;
- b) registering, in the memory of the controller, parameters of the protected space, variable in time, comprising at least value P(k) read from the pressure sensor, at current moment k;
- e) setting the so determined value of control U(k+l) as a frequency of the inverter controlling the fan motor.
- The solution to these problems is the invention being applied.
- A key element of the invention is a pressure controller together with a sensor (measurement of the pressure difference between the protected space and a reference pressure, e.g. atmospheric pressure). The controller is equipped with a processor with a high computational efficiency, equipped with floating-point arithmetic (high precision of calculations). The present inventors have surprisingly noted that the model of controlled process can be divided into two components: a static part describing the steady state and a dynamic part describing unsteady states. The essence of the invention consists in the fact that the static part of the model describes, in its entirety, hydraulic properties of the facility (leakage, current efficiency of the fan), whereas the dynamic part describes characteristics of the fan itself: motor dynamics and aerodynamic characteristics of the fan blades. The dynamic part is constant and the (non-linear) dynamics model is created on the basis of identification tests of a particular fan at the place of manufacture. This non-linear dynamics model is permanently inscribed in the controller. On the other hand, the static part of the process model is identified on an ongoing basis in each cycle of intervention of the controller (minimum cycle is 25[ms]): the controller brings the process to the steady state (a fraction of a second being enough) and based on the measurement of pressure difference and on knowledge of current frequency of the inverter, it calculates parameter a which describes hydraulic characteristics of the process, according to the formula: P=a·U^2, where P represents measured pressure difference, U represents control, i.e. frequency at which the inverter controls the fan motor. Determination of current values P and U allows calculation of current value of parameter a=P/U^2. This process performed with a period of controller intervention provides current non-linear model to the rest of the algorithm, the task of the said rest being to find an optimal trajectory of the control, i.e. control values for subsequent moments of time: current moment k, and subsequent ones k+1, k+2, k+3,... Normally, it is performed by solving the task of non-linear optimisation with restrictions. Unfortunately, there is not any general solution to such a task, iterative methods are used, the said methods not guaranteeing to achieve a global solution within the required short time. Another element of the invention is a method for quickly solving the task of non-linear optimisation, used in the invention. The present inventors have surprisingly noted that optimal trajectory differs by not more than 5% (most often) to 10% (in extreme cases) from the trajectory in the steady state, which at current moment can be calculated from the formula: u(k)=u(k+1)=u(k+2)=...=sqrt(P/a). The so determined point in the control space is in close proximity to the optimum solution (global minimum of the task of non-linear optimisation). Therefore, the feasible point of the task of non-linear optimisation is a predicted control trajectory for the steady state, determined as a result of identification of parameter a. This guarantees the convergence of the optimisation task and achieving the solution within the required short time.
- The object of the invention is a system for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of this fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure (reference pressure may be atmospheric pressure or pressure from the room in which a fire can potentially start), characterised in that the said controller is configured and programmed to perform the following steps:
- a) registering, in the memory of the controller, parameters of the fan, determined in time, including at least: minimum and maximum control of the inverter [Hz], calibration of current path for controlling the rotational speed of the inverter, determination of operation dynamics of the fan (acceleration time of the fan, deceleration time of the fan);
- b) registering, in the memory of the controller, parameters of the protected space, variable in time, comprising at least value P(k) read from the pressure sensor, value U(k) read from the inverter, inflow of air into the protected space and leakage of air from the protected space, at current moment k;
- c) determining the value of parameter a(k) at current moment k as a function of a(k)=P(k)/U2(k);
- d) determining the value of control U(k+1) at a subsequent moment of time k+1, by solving the task of non-linear optimisation by means of an iterative method, the feasible point of the iterative method being assumed as Ustart(k+1)=Sqrt(P(k)/a(k));
- e) setting the so determined value of control U(k+1) as a frequency of the inverter controlling the fan motor.
- The object of the invention is also a method for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, consisting in that in a system comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of this fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure, the following steps are performed:
- a) in the memory of the controller, parameters of the fan, determined in time, are registered, the said parameters including at least minimum and maximum control of the inverter [Hz], calibration of current path for controlling the rotational speed of the inverter, determination of dynamics of the fan operation (acceleration time of the fan, deceleration time of the fan);
- b) in the memory of the controller, parameters of the protected space, variable in time, are registered, the said parameters including at least value P(k) read from the pressure sensor, value U(k) read from the inverter, inflow of air into the protected space and leakage of air from the protected space, at current moment k;
- c) the value of parameter a(k) at current moment k is determined as a function of a(k)=P(k)/U2(k);
- d) the value of control U(k+1) at a subsequent moment of time k+1 is determined by solving the task of non-linear optimisation by means of an iterative method, the feasible point of the iterative method being assumed as Ustart(k+1)=Sqrf(P(k)/a(k));
- e) the controller sets the so determined value of control U(k+1) as a frequency of the inverter controlling the fan motor.
- Now, the invention will be presented in greater detail in a preferred embodiment, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
-
Fig. 1 (prior art) shows a known active control system with the use of PID controller; -
fig. 2 shows a model of a controlled process with a division into static part A and dynamic part B (Wiener-Hammerstein model); -
fig. 3 shows an exemplary graph of the control with an indication of static part A and dynamic part B; -
fig. 4 shows a solution according to the invention used in a vertical escape route (stairway in a facility -shopping mall), and -
fig. 5 shows an example of a method for controlling fan according to the invention in a real facility - shopping mall. -
Fig. 2 shows a model of a controlled process with a division into static part A and dynamic part B (Wiener-Hammerstein model), where the input parameter is U(k) - control at moment k and P(k) - pressure difference measured at moment k. Static part A of the model, in each cycle, determines parameter a describing hydraulic characteristics of the process, the said parameter being determined from the following equation: - P- represents measured pressure difference [Pa]
- U - represents control of the inverter [Hz]
- A point for measuring pressure by means of a pressure sensor pmacF - 1. The pressure sensor 1 measures pressure difference relative to a reference pressure, i.e. atmospheric pressure. Location of the pressure sensor 1 in
Fig. 4 is exemplary. The pressure sensor 1 is mounted in a place where the air flow entering the stairway from aninlet 3 does not affect directly the point at which the sensor 1 is located. Optionally, the pressure sensor 1 is mounted in other places of thestairway 5. - An
aeration unit 2 consisting of:- ∘ MAC-FC controller - it constitutes the "heart" of the entire system. In the controller, program containing an algorithm and supporting communication with other elements of the system: the pressure sensor 1, the inverter;
- ∘ Danfoss FC102 inverter for motors with power up to 10KW, which is controlled from MAC-FC controller through a current signal. In addition, the controller monitors operational state of the inverter through a serial transmission port;
- ∘ A 3-phase asynchronous motor with a power of 9.6 KW;
- ∘ A battery power system for MAC-FC controller;
- ∘ A fuse and relay block.
- An inlet of air flow to the
stairway 5 fromsupply ducts 3 directly connected to theaeration unit 2. - A system of ventilation (supply)
ducts 4 which convey air to the protected area; - The
stairway 5 constituting a vertical escape route from all stories of the building. In accordance with operation of the system according to the invention; thestairway 5 has to be free from smoke. Optionally, the escape route in this case is constituted by a corridor, which is a horizontal escape route. Thestairway 5 used as a vertical escape route is connected to technical corridors in the shopping mall. -
Utility rooms 6 in which a fire can start. In these rooms, there are people who, in the event of fire, evacuate through thestairway 5 from the burning facility.
- An inlet of air flow to the
- To aerate the
stairway 5, in the system according to the invention, the following elements were used: - MAC-FC controller
- A pressure sensor with a measuring range of 0 to 250 Pa
- Danfoss FC102 inverter
- An 9.6KW AC 3-phase asynchronous motor
-
Fig. 5 , shows an actual graph of inverter control U as a function of time (vertical axis on the right, [Hz]) in thestairway 5 with a presented response of the algorithm to opening and closing the door. A graph of pressure measured by the sensor 1 as a function of time (vertical axis on the left, [Pa]) is also shown. Values of control U achieved by the inverter vary in the range of 0[Hz] to 50[Hz] (control range of the inverter). - In
fig. 5 : - I, II - represents the steady state in the facility (static part A which describes it) - where the algorithm in each cycle with a period of 50[ms] determines static part A of the facility. In the static state, criterion of ensuring a constant overpressure (from 30 to 80[Pa]) has to be met. In the presented case, an overpressure relative to the reference pressure with a value of 50[Pa] is maintained. The control of the fan in this state is 11[Hz];
- III - moment of opening the door (dynamic part B), where an immediate response to the decrease in pressure takes place. In the dynamic state, criterion of ensuring an appropriate flow on the open door (at least 1[m/s]) has to be met. In this state, the control of the fan is 50[Hz] (maximum control that can be set on a given fan);
- IV - moment of closing the door (dynamic part B), where a sudden increase in pressure takes place as a result of closing the door. At this point, a transition to the steady state takes place and the control of the fan changes from 50[Hz] to 11[Hz];
- V - moment of pressure stabilisation after closing the door (about 2[s]) and a transition to the steady state of the facility (static part A). In the static state, like before opening the door, i.e. in the steady state I, II, the fan is controlled with a value of 11[Hz].
In a preferred embodiment, a fire protection system successfully used in a facility, being a shopping mall, is presented. The facility is illustrated schematically in
Claims (2)
- A system for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of said fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure, wherein said controller is configured and programmed to perform the following steps:a) registering, in the memory of the controller, parameters of the fan, determined in time, comprising at least: minimum and maximum control of the inverter [Hz], calibration of current path for controlling the rotational speed of the inverter, determination of operation dynamics of the fan, especially acceleration time of the fan, deceleration time of the fan;b) registering, in the memory of the controller, parameters of the protected space, variable in time, comprising at least value P(k) read from the pressure sensor, value U(k) read from the inverter, inflow of air into the protected space and leakage of air from the protected space, at current moment k;c) determining the value of parameter a(k) at current moment k as a function of a(k)=P(k)/U2(k);d) determining the value of control U(k+1) at a subsequent moment of time k+1, by solving the task of non-linear optimisation by means of an iterative method, the feasible point of the iterative method being assumed as Ustart(k+1)=Sqrt(P(k)/a(k));e) setting the so determined value of control U(k+1) as a frequency of the inverter controlling the fan motor.
- A method for controlling a fan insufflating air into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes, consisting in that in a system comprising a controller equipped with a processor with a high computational power and a memory, designed and configured to control the said fan by setting frequency U of the inverter controlling the motor of said fan and connected to this inverter, and in addition connected to a pressure sensor for measuring pressure difference P between the protected space and a reference pressure, the following steps are performed:a) in the memory of the controller, parameters of the fan, determined in time, are registered, the said parameters comprising at least minimum and maximum control of the inverter [Hz], calibration of current path for controlling the rotational speed of the inverter, determination of operation dynamics of the fan, especially acceleration time of the fan, deceleration time of the fan;b) in the memory of the controller, parameters of the protected space, variable in time, are registered, the said parameters comprising at least value P(k) read from the pressure sensor, value U(k) read from the inverter, inflow of air into the protected space and leakage of air from the protected space, at current moment k;c) the value of parameter a(k) at current moment k is determined as a function of a(k)=P(k)/U2(k);d) the value of control U(k+1) at a subsequent moment of time k+1 is determined by solving the task of non-linear optimisation by means of an iterative method, the feasible point of the iterative method being assumed as Ustart(k+1)=Sqrt(P(k)/a(k));e) the controller sets the so determined value of control U(k+1) as a frequency of the inverter controlling the fan motor.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL14461509T PL2910865T3 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2014-02-21 | System amd method for controlling a fan insufflating ait into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes |
EP14461509.3A EP2910865B1 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2014-02-21 | System amd method for controlling a fan insufflating ait into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14461509.3A EP2910865B1 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2014-02-21 | System amd method for controlling a fan insufflating ait into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2910865A1 EP2910865A1 (en) | 2015-08-26 |
EP2910865B1 true EP2910865B1 (en) | 2016-11-23 |
Family
ID=50479168
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14461509.3A Active EP2910865B1 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2014-02-21 | System amd method for controlling a fan insufflating ait into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2910865B1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL2910865T3 (en) |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07139775A (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1995-05-30 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Ventilating fan controller |
US6033302A (en) | 1997-11-07 | 2000-03-07 | Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. | Room pressure control apparatus having feedforward and feedback control and method |
DE19937532A1 (en) | 1999-08-09 | 2001-02-15 | Brantec Gmbh Solothurn | Arrangement for setting a pressure difference reduces sensed pressure difference between escape route and surroundings towards demand value, preferably between 15 and 35 Pa |
KR100317243B1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2001-12-22 | 황해웅 | The construction and automatic differential pressure maintenance of smoke free safety zone for used water head switch |
DE10241625A1 (en) | 2002-09-04 | 2004-03-18 | Zimmermann, Arndt, Dipl.-Ing. oec. | Overpressure ventilation system in buildings to prevent entry of fire, smoke or other gases in protected rooms has overpressure safety flap working independently of auxiliary power and which opens with impermissibly high pressure |
CA2405858A1 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2004-04-01 | George Bergman | Stairwell pressurization system |
JP2005207674A (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2005-08-04 | Hitachi Ltd | Ventilation air conditioning equipment of building |
JP4747322B2 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2011-08-17 | 清水建設株式会社 | Smoke exhaust system |
US7603186B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2009-10-13 | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | Adaptive response time closed loop control algorithm |
MY151881A (en) | 2007-05-07 | 2014-07-14 | Oyl Res And Dev Ct Sdn Bhd | Airflow control for variable speed blowers |
PL218095B6 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2022-06-13 | Smay Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością | Method for pressure regulation in vertical escape routes |
GB201000479D0 (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2010-03-03 | Fire Engineering Associates Ltd | Smoke suppression system |
JP5085716B2 (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2012-11-28 | 株式会社東芝 | Air conditioning system for server room management, server management system using the same, and air conditioning control method |
DK2508811T3 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2014-04-14 | Zehnder Verkauf Verwaltung | Device for determining the volume flow conveyed by a fan |
GB2492372A (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2013-01-02 | David John Royle | Building pressurisation or depressurisation apparatus for ventilating a building based upon the position of a door or window |
CN203024345U (en) | 2013-01-16 | 2013-06-26 | 苏州工业园区嘉合环境技术工程有限公司 | Variable-frequency fan for clean chamber |
-
2014
- 2014-02-21 PL PL14461509T patent/PL2910865T3/en unknown
- 2014-02-21 EP EP14461509.3A patent/EP2910865B1/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2910865A1 (en) | 2015-08-26 |
PL2910865T3 (en) | 2017-02-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP5045758B2 (en) | Deactivation device with nitrogen generator | |
EP2353658B1 (en) | Inert gas suppression system for temperature control | |
US9182143B2 (en) | Room pressure controlling system | |
JP6978809B2 (en) | Fire shelter room | |
EP1623947A4 (en) | Fire control system of elevator | |
US9310271B2 (en) | System and method for measuring a leakage area for constructing a smoke-ventilation apparatus | |
JP2020010949A (en) | Pressurized smoke exhaust system | |
KR20130136758A (en) | Air supply damper for arithmetic and control unit of pressure-air flow | |
EP2910865B1 (en) | System amd method for controlling a fan insufflating ait into a protected space, especially in fire ventilation for the protection of escape routes | |
CN114303029A (en) | Comprehensive flue gas control system | |
KR20130104972A (en) | Elevator supplying oxygen | |
JP2018057576A (en) | Air conditioning device | |
KR20200051293A (en) | System for smoke protection of the living room | |
KR20150017398A (en) | Metod of fire smoke control and apparatus of smoke-proof of building | |
KR101282771B1 (en) | A method for controlling face velocity of fume hood | |
CN118008110B (en) | Airtight steel fireproof door and intelligent monitoring method thereof | |
EP4324531A2 (en) | Fire protection system for an enclosure and method of fire protection for an enclosure | |
CN107376544A (en) | A kind of fire-proof and explosion-proof dust pelletizing system and its method | |
CN113047891A (en) | Tunnel safety system | |
CN104712167A (en) | Fire life-saving refuge room and working method thereof | |
KR20160057799A (en) | Fire extinguishing system using inergen or carbon dioxide gas and fire extinguishing method using the same | |
KR101987787B1 (en) | fume hood controller | |
KR20140106469A (en) | Elevator supplying oxygen | |
KR200474019Y1 (en) | Manual switch for composition damper | |
KR20180061814A (en) | The System and apparatus for prevent flashover |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20150909 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: PLUM SP. Z O.O. |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160609 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160617 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 848277 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602014005029 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20161123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 848277 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170224 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170323 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602014005029 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170223 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170824 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20140221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170323 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230215 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230307 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230220 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240215 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20240214 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602014005029 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240903 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240229 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240903 |