EP2744039A1 - Improvements in and relating to antennas - Google Patents
Improvements in and relating to antennas Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2744039A1 EP2744039A1 EP12275203.3A EP12275203A EP2744039A1 EP 2744039 A1 EP2744039 A1 EP 2744039A1 EP 12275203 A EP12275203 A EP 12275203A EP 2744039 A1 EP2744039 A1 EP 2744039A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sub
- antenna
- array
- antennas
- arrays
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013021 overheating Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
- H01Q1/002—Protection against seismic waves, thermal radiation or other disturbances, e.g. nuclear explosion; Arrangements for improving the power handling capability of an antenna
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q21/00—Antenna arrays or systems
- H01Q21/0006—Particular feeding systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q21/00—Antenna arrays or systems
- H01Q21/06—Arrays of individually energised antenna units similarly polarised and spaced apart
- H01Q21/22—Antenna units of the array energised non-uniformly in amplitude or phase, e.g. tapered array or binomial array
Definitions
- the invention relates to antenna systems, such as antenna systems comprising multiple separate sub-antennas, or sub-arrays of antennas, used in combination to form an antenna beam such as, but not limited to, phased antenna arrays.
- a phased array antenna system comprises a directive antenna made up of a number of individual antenna radiating elements driven with signals controlled so that the radiation beam pattern produced by the antenna radiating elements collectively may be steered in direction. The converse is true of the receiving beam pattern.
- the beam of an array of antenna elements can be electronically steered rapidly as a result.
- a linear antenna array may consist of antenna elements, or separate sub-arrays of antenna elements, arranged in a straight line in one dimension, typically with an equal spacing between antenna elements, or sub-arrays.
- This is an idealised situation, but illustrates the formation of an antenna beam using an array of antenna elements in combination.
- the spacing of the elements ( d ) should preferably be no greater than half the signal wavelength in order to avoid grating lobes appearing to close to the main beam position.
- Grating lobes are generally undesirable side lobes within a beam pattern which can cause ambiguities, and can lead to misidentification of objects in radar systems. It is also to be noted that grating lobes may occur not only when the element spacing of an array is too large but also when the regularity of the spacing of the elements ( d ) is broken.
- grating lobes appear in the beam pattern.
- the invention addresses this in an antenna structure.
- the invention may provide a directional antenna comprising: a first plurality of sub-antennas forming an antenna array; a second plurality of RF receiver units fewer in number than the first plurality and each arranged for receiving RF signals from one or more of said sub-antennas and for outputting a receiver signal accordingly; a signal processor for receiving and processing said receiver signals according to a directional antenna beam pattern; wherein at least two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas are connected to a common one said RF receiver unit to provide a combined RF signal thereto.
- More than two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas may be connected to a common one said RF receiver unit to provide a combined RF signal thereto and none of the sub-antennas so connected are neighbouring sub-antennas.
- At least two said RF receiver units are separately connected to a respective at least two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas which provide a combined RF signal thereto.
- the invention may provide a directional antenna comprising: a plurality of sub-antennas forming an antenna array; a plurality of RF receiver units each arranged for receiving RF signals from a respective one of said sub-antennas and for outputting a receiver signal accordingly; a signal processor for receiving and processing said receiver signals according to a directional antenna beam pattern; wherein neighbouring said RF receiver units are connected to non-neighbouring respective said sub-antennas.
- the directional antenna may include a signal processor and in which the plurality of sub-antennas form a phased-array of sub-antennas, wherein the signal processor is arrange to control the phases applied to sub-arrays of the antenna array to control the beam pattern direction thereof.
- One, some or each of said sub-antennas may comprise a sub-array comprising a plurality antenna radiating elements.
- a said sub-array preferably comprises a linear array of antenna radiating elements.
- Each sub-antenna of the antenna array is preferably spaced from each neighbouring sub-antenna by a common distance.
- Figure 1 schematically illustrates an antenna system 1 comprising a vertical stack of ten equally-spaced sub-arrays of antenna elements (2 to 11), each of which is a substantially identical regular horizontally linear array of six radiating elements 12 connected via a common RF signal input/output port of the sub-array to an RF signal input port of a respective one of seven RF receiver units (13 to 19), and thence to a signal processing unit 20 arranged to process received RF signals and output the result 33 for use as desired.
- RF receivers are typically expensive and quite large items of equipment. Their use in antenna systems, especially in compact and relatively light-weight radar systems, may be minimised as shown schematically in Figure 1 .
- a first and uppermost sub-array 2 of the ten sub-arrays and a fourth intermediate sub-array 5 of the ten sub-arrays are each connected to the RF signal input port of a common, shared first RF receiver unit 13 via an RF signal transmission line (21, 22) containing a directional coupler 23 for combining the RF signals output by the first and fourth sub-arrays into one combined RF signal for input to the shared RF receiver unit.
- the second 3, third 4, sixth 7, eighth 9 and ninth 10 intermediate sub-arrays of the ten sub-arrays are connected, respectively, to a fifth 17, fourth 16, second 14, third 15 and sixth 18 separate, dedicated RF receiver unit via a respective RF signal transmission line (24 to 31).
- the fifth 6 and seventh 8 intermediate sub-arrays and the lowermost tenth sub-array 11 is each connected to the RF signal input port of a common, shared seventh RF receiver unit 19 via an RF signal transmission line (28, 29 and 31) containing a directional coupler 32 for combining the RF signals output by the fifth, seventh and tenth sub-arrays into one combined RF signal for input to the shared RF receiver unit.
- the first and fourth sub-arrays effectively form one larger "super" sub-array having an effective "super” sub-array centre mid-way between the two sub-arrays which form it.
- the fifth, seventh and tenth sub-arrays effectively form one more even larger "super" sub-array having an effective "super” sub-array centre located between the outer two sub-arrays which form its upper and lower limits.
- the sub-arrays which form a part of any one of the two "super" sub-arrays sharing a common receiver unit are non-neighbouring sub-arrays.
- the result is that the effective centres of the two "super" sub-arrays is each located substantially close to or between a given two of the other sub-arrays of the antenna array. This means the separation between the effective centre of any "super" sub-array and a given sub-array closest to that effective centre, is not greater than the regular separation between sub-arrays of the antenna array. This minimises the effects of grating lobes for the reasons outlined above in respect of the idealised array example.
- the allocation of which of the ten sub-arrays to connect to which of the seven RF receiver units is preferably generated randomly, e.g. via a random selection, with the condition that if more than one sub-array is assigned to a given RF receiver unit, then not all of the sub-arrays are neighbouring arrays, and more preferably that none of the sub-arrays are neighbouring sub-arrays (as shown in Figure 1 ).
- This randomised selection/allocation process has been found to provide better suppression of grating lobe effects across the array by spreading out those effects across the array.
- only the allocation of the sub-arrays to be connected to a common receiver unit is performed in this way, and the allocation of remaining sub-arrays to single, dedicated receiver units may be non-random.
- the allocation of which of the ten antenna sub-arrays to connect to which of the seven RF receiver units is made to provide optimal antenna performance as desired, subject to the conditions described above.
- the signal processor unit contains a mapping table which tabulates which of the antenna sub-arrays is connected to which of the RF receiver units such that the signal processor 20 may determine the relative location (within the array) of the sub-array, or "super" sub-array, responsible for a given received signal 34. This is because the relative positions of the receiver units generally no longer correlates directly to the physical positions of the sub-arrays they receive RF signals from in use.
- the invention in the aspect illustrated in Figure1 permits a limited number of RF receivers to be used with a greater number of antenna sub-arrays.
- the benefit is lower cost and weight, while having the advantages of "super" sub-arrays which each have a greater aperture size, gain and resolution than any one sub-array alone, while managing and at least to some extent suppressing the otherwise deleterious effects of grating lobes.
- FIG. 2 shows an antenna system 35 comprising a vertical stack of ten equally-spaced sub-arrays of antenna elements (2 to 11), each of which is a substantially identical regular horizontally linear array of six radiating elements (12) connected via a common RF signal input/output port of the sub-array to an RF signal input port of a respective one of ten RF receiver units (40 to 49), and thence to a signal processing unit 20 arranged to process received RF signals 34 and output the result 33 for use as desired.
- Each antenna sub-array has a dedicated RF receiver unit connected to it alone, via an RF signal transmission line (50 to 59).
- the allocation of which of the ten antenna sub-arrays to connect to which of the ten RF receiver units is preferably made to provide optimal antenna performance as desired, with the condition neighbouring antenna sub-arrays are assigned to a non-neighbouring RF receiver units (as shown in Figure 2 ).
- This selection/allocation process has been found to provide better suppression of grating lobe effects across the array in the event of failure of two or more neighbouring RF receiver units. This is due to the spreading out those effects across the array.
- the signal processor unit contains a mapping table which tabulates which of the antenna sub-arrays is connected to which of the RF receiver units such that the signal processor may determine the relative location (within the array) of the sub-array responsible for a given received signal. This is because the relative positions of the receiver units generally no longer correlates directly to the physical positions of the sub-arrays they receive RF signals from in use.
- RF signal receivers may often happen due to overheating for example.
- a given overheated receiver unit may cause overheating in a neighbouring receiver unit, typically nearby.
- receiver units arranged in an antenna system are susceptible to failure in neighbouring groups.
- the effect would be the loss of two neighbouring antenna sub-arrays within the antenna array (e.g. the middle two sub-arrays) producing a "hole" in the working antenna array structure.
- the resultant effect upon the antenna beam pattern would be the generation of grating side lobes for the reasons given above.
- FIG. 1 and Figure 2 is a vertical array of horizontal antenna sub-arrays with grating lobes suppressed in the elevation direction, however by turning the array through 90 degrees one may provide a horizontal array of vertical antenna sub-arrays with grating lobes suppressed in the azimuth direction.
Landscapes
- Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
A directional antenna (1) comprising a first plurality of antenna sub-arrays (2 - 11) forming an antenna array, a second plurality of RF receiver units (13 - 19) fewer in number than the first plurality and each arranged for receiving RF signals from one or more of the antenna sub-arrays and for outputting a receiver signal accordingly. A signal processor (20) processes the receiver signals according to a directional antenna beam pattern. At least two non-neighbouring said sub-arrays (2, 5) are connected to a common one RF receiver unit (13) to provide a combined RF signal thereto.
Description
- The invention relates to antenna systems, such as antenna systems comprising multiple separate sub-antennas, or sub-arrays of antennas, used in combination to form an antenna beam such as, but not limited to, phased antenna arrays.
- A phased array antenna system comprises a directive antenna made up of a number of individual antenna radiating elements driven with signals controlled so that the radiation beam pattern produced by the antenna radiating elements collectively may be steered in direction. The converse is true of the receiving beam pattern. The beam of an array of antenna elements can be electronically steered rapidly as a result.
- A linear antenna array may consist of antenna elements, or separate sub-arrays of antenna elements, arranged in a straight line in one dimension, typically with an equal spacing between antenna elements, or sub-arrays. An idealised linear array composed of N isotropic array elements with an equal spacing d apart may produce a combined output voltage E in response to an incoming radio signal of wavelength λ received from a broadside direction θ to the line of the array, which is the sum of the voltages of the voltages of the array elements and takes the form:
-
- The maximum occurring at N=0 corresponds to the main beam of the antenna array. The beam of the idealised linear array may be steered in direction to an angle θ0 by applying a relative signal phase shift δ equal to:
- So-called "grating lobes", will appear in the intensity pattern of the idealised array at angles θg whenever:
Thus, the spacing of the elements (d) should preferably be no greater than half the signal wavelength in order to avoid grating lobes appearing to close to the main beam position. Grating lobes are generally undesirable side lobes within a beam pattern which can cause ambiguities, and can lead to misidentification of objects in radar systems. It is also to be noted that grating lobes may occur not only when the element spacing of an array is too large but also when the regularity of the spacing of the elements (d) is broken. For example, when in an array most of the elements are spaced by a regular distance (d), but some neighbouring elements are spaced by a greater distance (e.g. 2d), grating lobes appear in the beam pattern. The greater the deviation from regularity in the element array structure, generally speaking, the greater is the size of the resulting grating lobe(s). - The invention addresses this in an antenna structure.
- In a first aspect, the invention may provide a directional antenna comprising: a first plurality of sub-antennas forming an antenna array; a second plurality of RF receiver units fewer in number than the first plurality and each arranged for receiving RF signals from one or more of said sub-antennas and for outputting a receiver signal accordingly; a signal processor for receiving and processing said receiver signals according to a directional antenna beam pattern; wherein at least two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas are connected to a common one said RF receiver unit to provide a combined RF signal thereto.
- More than two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas may be connected to a common one said RF receiver unit to provide a combined RF signal thereto and none of the sub-antennas so connected are neighbouring sub-antennas.
- Preferably, at least two said RF receiver units are separately connected to a respective at least two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas which provide a combined RF signal thereto.
- In a second aspect, the invention may provide a directional antenna comprising: a plurality of sub-antennas forming an antenna array; a plurality of RF receiver units each arranged for receiving RF signals from a respective one of said sub-antennas and for outputting a receiver signal accordingly; a signal processor for receiving and processing said receiver signals according to a directional antenna beam pattern; wherein neighbouring said RF receiver units are connected to non-neighbouring respective said sub-antennas.
- The directional antenna may include a signal processor and in which the plurality of sub-antennas form a phased-array of sub-antennas, wherein the signal processor is arrange to control the phases applied to sub-arrays of the antenna array to control the beam pattern direction thereof.
- One, some or each of said sub-antennas may comprise a sub-array comprising a plurality antenna radiating elements. A said sub-array preferably comprises a linear array of antenna radiating elements. Each sub-antenna of the antenna array is preferably spaced from each neighbouring sub-antenna by a common distance.
-
-
Figure 1 schematically illustrates an antenna system according to an embodiment of the invention; -
Figure 2 schematically illustrates an antenna system according to an embodiment of the invention. -
Figure 1 schematically illustrates an antenna system 1 comprising a vertical stack of ten equally-spaced sub-arrays of antenna elements (2 to 11), each of which is a substantially identical regular horizontally linear array of sixradiating elements 12 connected via a common RF signal input/output port of the sub-array to an RF signal input port of a respective one of seven RF receiver units (13 to 19), and thence to asignal processing unit 20 arranged to process received RF signals and output theresult 33 for use as desired. - RF receivers are typically expensive and quite large items of equipment. Their use in antenna systems, especially in compact and relatively light-weight radar systems, may be minimised as shown schematically in
Figure 1 . - A first and
uppermost sub-array 2 of the ten sub-arrays and a fourthintermediate sub-array 5 of the ten sub-arrays are each connected to the RF signal input port of a common, shared firstRF receiver unit 13 via an RF signal transmission line (21, 22) containing adirectional coupler 23 for combining the RF signals output by the first and fourth sub-arrays into one combined RF signal for input to the shared RF receiver unit. - The second 3, third 4, sixth 7, eighth 9 and ninth 10 intermediate sub-arrays of the ten sub-arrays are connected, respectively, to a fifth 17, fourth 16, second 14, third 15 and sixth 18 separate, dedicated RF receiver unit via a respective RF signal transmission line (24 to 31).
- Finally, the fifth 6 and seventh 8 intermediate sub-arrays and the lowermost
tenth sub-array 11 is each connected to the RF signal input port of a common, shared seventhRF receiver unit 19 via an RF signal transmission line (28, 29 and 31) containing adirectional coupler 32 for combining the RF signals output by the fifth, seventh and tenth sub-arrays into one combined RF signal for input to the shared RF receiver unit. - Consequently, the first and fourth sub-arrays effectively form one larger "super" sub-array having an effective "super" sub-array centre mid-way between the two sub-arrays which form it. Similarly, the fifth, seventh and tenth sub-arrays effectively form one more even larger "super" sub-array having an effective "super" sub-array centre located between the outer two sub-arrays which form its upper and lower limits.
- It is to be noted that the sub-arrays which form a part of any one of the two "super" sub-arrays sharing a common receiver unit are non-neighbouring sub-arrays. The result is that the effective centres of the two "super" sub-arrays is each located substantially close to or between a given two of the other sub-arrays of the antenna array. This means the separation between the effective centre of any "super" sub-array and a given sub-array closest to that effective centre, is not greater than the regular separation between sub-arrays of the antenna array. This minimises the effects of grating lobes for the reasons outlined above in respect of the idealised array example. Had the sub-arrays forming a given "super" all been a succession of neighbouring sub-arrays, the effective mid-point centre of the "super" array would have been spaced from the nearest regular (non-"super") sub-array by a distance exceeding the regular spacing between sub-arrays. This would tend to promote the presence and effects of grating lobes.
- The allocation of which of the ten sub-arrays to connect to which of the seven RF receiver units is preferably generated randomly, e.g. via a random selection, with the condition that if more than one sub-array is assigned to a given RF receiver unit, then not all of the sub-arrays are neighbouring arrays, and more preferably that none of the sub-arrays are neighbouring sub-arrays (as shown in
Figure 1 ). This randomised selection/allocation process has been found to provide better suppression of grating lobe effects across the array by spreading out those effects across the array. In other embodiments, only the allocation of the sub-arrays to be connected to a common receiver unit is performed in this way, and the allocation of remaining sub-arrays to single, dedicated receiver units may be non-random. In alternative embodiments the allocation of which of the ten antenna sub-arrays to connect to which of the seven RF receiver units is made to provide optimal antenna performance as desired, subject to the conditions described above. - In any case, the signal processor unit contains a mapping table which tabulates which of the antenna sub-arrays is connected to which of the RF receiver units such that the
signal processor 20 may determine the relative location (within the array) of the sub-array, or "super" sub-array, responsible for a given receivedsignal 34. This is because the relative positions of the receiver units generally no longer correlates directly to the physical positions of the sub-arrays they receive RF signals from in use. - The invention in the aspect illustrated in
Figure1 , and discussed above, permits a limited number of RF receivers to be used with a greater number of antenna sub-arrays. The benefit is lower cost and weight, while having the advantages of "super" sub-arrays which each have a greater aperture size, gain and resolution than any one sub-array alone, while managing and at least to some extent suppressing the otherwise deleterious effects of grating lobes. - In another aspect of the invention, is illustrated in
Figure 2 which shows anantenna system 35 comprising a vertical stack of ten equally-spaced sub-arrays of antenna elements (2 to 11), each of which is a substantially identical regular horizontally linear array of six radiating elements (12) connected via a common RF signal input/output port of the sub-array to an RF signal input port of a respective one of ten RF receiver units (40 to 49), and thence to asignal processing unit 20 arranged to process receivedRF signals 34 and output theresult 33 for use as desired. Each antenna sub-array has a dedicated RF receiver unit connected to it alone, via an RF signal transmission line (50 to 59). - The allocation of which of the ten antenna sub-arrays to connect to which of the ten RF receiver units is preferably made to provide optimal antenna performance as desired, with the condition neighbouring antenna sub-arrays are assigned to a non-neighbouring RF receiver units (as shown in
Figure 2 ). This selection/allocation process has been found to provide better suppression of grating lobe effects across the array in the event of failure of two or more neighbouring RF receiver units. This is due to the spreading out those effects across the array. The signal processor unit contains a mapping table which tabulates which of the antenna sub-arrays is connected to which of the RF receiver units such that the signal processor may determine the relative location (within the array) of the sub-array responsible for a given received signal. This is because the relative positions of the receiver units generally no longer correlates directly to the physical positions of the sub-arrays they receive RF signals from in use. - Failure of RF signal receivers may often happen due to overheating for example. In such a case, a given overheated receiver unit may cause overheating in a neighbouring receiver unit, typically nearby. Thus, receiver units arranged in an antenna system are susceptible to failure in neighbouring groups. In the even of such a failure, and were it not for the non-neighbour allocation of antenna sub-arrays to neighbouring receiver units, the effect would be the loss of two neighbouring antenna sub-arrays within the antenna array (e.g. the middle two sub-arrays) producing a "hole" in the working antenna array structure. The resultant effect upon the antenna beam pattern would be the generation of grating side lobes for the reasons given above. By avoiding the allocation of neighbouring antenna sub-arrays to neighbouring receiver units, to likelihood of this occurring is minimised because the failure of two neighbouring receiver units does not lead to the loss of a corresponding two neighbouring antenna sub-arrays.
- The example shown in
Figure 1 andFigure 2 is a vertical array of horizontal antenna sub-arrays with grating lobes suppressed in the elevation direction, however by turning the array through 90 degrees one may provide a horizontal array of vertical antenna sub-arrays with grating lobes suppressed in the azimuth direction. - The embodiments described above are presented for illustrative purposes and it is to be understood that variations, modifications and equivalents thereto such as would be readily apparent to the skilled person are encompassed within the scope of the invention.
Claims (8)
- A directional antenna comprising:a first plurality of sub-antennas forming an antenna array;a second plurality of RF receiver units fewer in number than the first plurality and each arranged for receiving RF signals from one or more of said sub-antennas and for outputting a receiver signal accordingly;a signal processor for receiving and processing said receiver signals according to a directional antenna beam pattern;wherein at least two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas are connected to a common one said RF receiver unit to provide a combined RF signal thereto.
- A directional antenna according to any preceding claim in which more than two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas are connected to a common one said RF receiver unit to provide a combined RF signal thereto and none of the sub-antennas so connected are neighbouring sub-antennas.
- A directional antenna according to any preceding claim in which at least two said RF receiver units are separately connected to a respective at least two non-neighbouring said sub-antennas which provide a combined RF signal thereto.
- A directional antenna comprising:a plurality of sub-antennas forming an antenna array;a plurality of RF receiver units each arranged for receiving RF signals from a respective one of said sub-antennas and for outputting a receiver signal accordingly;a signal processor for receiving and processing said receiver signals according to a directional antenna beam pattern;wherein neighbouring said RF receiver units are connected to non-neighbouring respective said sub-antennas.
- A directional antenna according to any proceeding claim including a signal processor and in which the plurality of sub-antennas form a phased-array of sub-antennas, wherein the signal processor is arrange to control the phases applied to sub-arrays of the antenna array to control the beam pattern direction thereof.
- A directional antenna according to any preceding claim in which one, some or each of said sub-antennas comprises a sub-array comprising a plurality antenna radiating elements.
- A directional antenna according to claim 6 in which said sub-array comprises a linear array of antenna radiating elements.
- A directional antenna according to any preceding claim in which each sub-antenna of the antenna array is spaced from each neighbouring sub-antenna by a common distance.
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP12275203.3A EP2744039A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2012-12-14 | Improvements in and relating to antennas |
AU2013356995A AU2013356995A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2013-12-05 | Improvements in and relating to antennas |
US14/651,928 US20150349433A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2013-12-05 | Improvements in and relating to antennas |
EP13805479.6A EP2932557A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2013-12-05 | Improvements in and relating to antennas |
BR112015013921A BR112015013921A2 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2013-12-05 | directional antenna. |
PCT/GB2013/053210 WO2014091205A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2013-12-05 | Improvements in and relating to antennas |
CL2015001650A CL2015001650A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2015-06-12 | Improvement in and related to antennas |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP12275203.3A EP2744039A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2012-12-14 | Improvements in and relating to antennas |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2744039A1 true EP2744039A1 (en) | 2014-06-18 |
Family
ID=47563121
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12275203.3A Ceased EP2744039A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2012-12-14 | Improvements in and relating to antennas |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2744039A1 (en) |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3500414A (en) * | 1968-10-25 | 1970-03-10 | Us Navy | Thinned antenna array with reduced grating lobe ambiguities |
EP0310661B1 (en) * | 1987-04-23 | 1994-06-29 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Low sidelobe phased array antenna using identical solid state modules |
GB2398429A (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-08-18 | Bae Systems Plc | Partitioning an antenna array |
US20050001765A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Combined beamforming-diversity wireless fading channel demodulator using adaptive sub-array group antennas, signal receiving system and method for mobile communications |
US20080268790A1 (en) * | 2007-04-25 | 2008-10-30 | Fong Shi | Antenna system including a power management and control system |
US20090251370A1 (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2009-10-08 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus, method, computer program product and computer program distribution medium |
-
2012
- 2012-12-14 EP EP12275203.3A patent/EP2744039A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3500414A (en) * | 1968-10-25 | 1970-03-10 | Us Navy | Thinned antenna array with reduced grating lobe ambiguities |
EP0310661B1 (en) * | 1987-04-23 | 1994-06-29 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Low sidelobe phased array antenna using identical solid state modules |
GB2398429A (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-08-18 | Bae Systems Plc | Partitioning an antenna array |
US20050001765A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Combined beamforming-diversity wireless fading channel demodulator using adaptive sub-array group antennas, signal receiving system and method for mobile communications |
US20080268790A1 (en) * | 2007-04-25 | 2008-10-30 | Fong Shi | Antenna system including a power management and control system |
US20090251370A1 (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2009-10-08 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus, method, computer program product and computer program distribution medium |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
DAVIES D E N: "LOW SIDELOBE PATTERNS FROM THINNED ARRAYS USING MULTIPLICATIVE PROCESSING", IEE PROCEEDINGS F. COMMUNICATIONS, RADAR & SIGNALPROCESSING, INSTITUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS. STEVENAGE, GB, vol. 127, no. 1, 1 February 1980 (1980-02-01), pages 9 - 15, XP008075046, ISSN: 0956-375X * |
MATSUDA S ET AL: "A STUDY ON ROBUST BEAM-FORMING ALGORITHM FOR SEARCH OPERATION IN DISTRIBUTED ARRAY RADAR", ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN, PART I - COMMUNICATIONS, WILEY, HOBOKEN, NJ, US, vol. 90, no. 5, 1 January 2007 (2007-01-01), pages 33 - 47, XP001504042, ISSN: 8756-6621, DOI: 10.1002/ECJA.20325 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6943732B2 (en) | Two-dimensional antenna array | |
US10218086B2 (en) | Array antenna device | |
JP5584783B2 (en) | Antenna with variable beam characteristics | |
EP3238305B1 (en) | A method for beamforming a beam using an active antenna | |
EP2916144A1 (en) | MIMO antenna with elevation detection | |
EP2916140A2 (en) | Mimo antenna with improved grating lobe characteristics | |
WO2019172955A3 (en) | Antenna array having a different beam-steering resolution in one dimension than in another dimension | |
US20150355313A1 (en) | Hybrid Data Adaptive and Decision Adaptive Antenna Array for Automotive Radar | |
US9472845B2 (en) | Multiband 40 degree split beam antenna for wireless network | |
EP2436084B1 (en) | An improved antenna arrangement | |
EP3231037B1 (en) | High coverage antenna array and method using grating lobe layers | |
JP4724862B2 (en) | Array antenna | |
KR101060067B1 (en) | Two-dimensional antenna array | |
US20140132449A1 (en) | Antenna System Having Guard Array and Associated Techniques | |
EP3555955B1 (en) | Dual frequency electronically scanned array and related techniques | |
US20040178964A1 (en) | Two-dimensional antenna array | |
EP3963671B1 (en) | Multi-beam on receive electronically-steerable antenna | |
TWI696314B (en) | Multi-beam phased antenna structure and controlling method thereof | |
EP2744039A1 (en) | Improvements in and relating to antennas | |
AU2013356995A1 (en) | Improvements in and relating to antennas | |
JP4515897B2 (en) | Array antenna and its placement method | |
GB2508898A (en) | Directional antenna array arrangements | |
US11784403B2 (en) | Antenna array and a phased array system with such antenna array | |
WO2001069798A2 (en) | Device and method for an antenna array with switchable wide-angle coverage | |
JP2005303801A (en) | Antenna device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20121214 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED |
|
18R | Application refused |
Effective date: 20140711 |