EP2279316A1 - Optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like - Google Patents
Optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the likeInfo
- Publication number
- EP2279316A1 EP2279316A1 EP08763796A EP08763796A EP2279316A1 EP 2279316 A1 EP2279316 A1 EP 2279316A1 EP 08763796 A EP08763796 A EP 08763796A EP 08763796 A EP08763796 A EP 08763796A EP 2279316 A1 EP2279316 A1 EP 2279316A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- opening
- selvage
- wall
- unit
- gaskets
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000000763 evoking effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- PXUQTDZNOHRWLI-OXUVVOBNSA-O malvidin 3-O-beta-D-glucoside Chemical compound COC1=C(O)C(OC)=CC(C=2C(=CC=3C(O)=CC(O)=CC=3[O+]=2)O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)=C1 PXUQTDZNOHRWLI-OXUVVOBNSA-O 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009413 insulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001010 compromised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010339 dilation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005057 refrigeration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001932 seasonal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05B—LOCKS; ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; HANDCUFFS
- E05B15/00—Other details of locks; Parts for engagement by bolts of fastening devices
- E05B15/02—Striking-plates; Keepers; Bolt staples; Escutcheons
- E05B15/0205—Striking-plates, keepers, staples
- E05B15/022—Striking-plates, keepers, staples movable, resilient or yieldable
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05B—LOCKS; ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; HANDCUFFS
- E05B15/00—Other details of locks; Parts for engagement by bolts of fastening devices
- E05B15/02—Striking-plates; Keepers; Bolt staples; Escutcheons
- E05B15/0205—Striking-plates, keepers, staples
- E05B15/024—Striking-plates, keepers, staples adjustable
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like.
- selvages which have elements for fixing to the jamb which are of an adjustable type and by means of which the selvage is aligned with the latch or bolt during assembly.
- gaskets In order to maintain the door in conditions of ideal thermal and acoustic insulation of the rooms that it divides, it is often convenient to fit gaskets along the surface of the jamb along which the door abuts. The gaskets, when the door is closed, are clamped between the lateral edge of the door and the jamb and therefore ensure the seal, preventing the passage of air between the rooms.
- this gasket which must remain compressed, entails an elastic reaction thereof, which can affect the force with which the latch or bolt is forced against the wall of the selvage in the configuration in which the door is closed.
- this gasket which must remain compressed, entails an elastic reaction thereof, which can affect the force with which the latch or bolt is forced against the wall of the selvage in the configuration in which the door is closed.
- the gaskets and/or components can undergo dimensional variations (thermal contractions or expansions), with consequent modification of the closure conditions.
- a contraction of the gaskets will entail a great reduction in the mutual compression force between the latch or bolt and the corresponding wall of the selvage: in an extreme case, the gaskets might contract so much that they no longer ensure tightness even if the latch or bolt is inserted in the selvage. In this case, air passages (entailing draughts) will occur and ' the desired thermal and acoustic insulation will be compromised.
- Some statutory provisions (particularly in the case of doors installed on safety exit routes) require the handles to be actuatable by applying a force which does not exceed a predefined limit value.
- the dimensional variations of the gaskets can convert a lock which complies with statutory provisions into a lock which requires an actuation force which is greater than the maximum one predefined by the statutory provisions and is therefore not adapted for that type of installation. Disclosure of the Invention
- the aim of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like with which it is possible to make the actuation force of the handle (or of the panic bar or other opening element) of the lock independent of gasket size variation phenomena.
- an object of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like with which it is possible to ensure the perfect seal of the gaskets regardless of their size variations.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like which makes the behavior of the lock associated therewith independent of the size variations of any component of the lock, of the door and of the jamb.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like which has low costs, is relatively simple to provide in practice and is safe in application.
- This aim and these and other objects, which will become better apparent hereinafter, are achieved by the present optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like, of the type that comprises a frame provided with at least one opening, and respective elements for coupling to the installation jamb, characterized in that said opening comprises at least one unit which interferes with said opening and is arranged along it so as to face it, so as to reduce the width of said opening, said unit yielding to external forcing actions directed toward the corresponding wall of said installation opening.
- Figure 1 is a front view of a first embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention
- Figure 2 is a sectional side view of a first embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention
- Figure 3 is a rear view of a first embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention
- Figure 4 is a front view of a second embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention.
- Figure 5 is a sectional side view of a second embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention.
- Figure 6 is a rear view of a second embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention.
- Figure 7 is a front view of a third embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention.
- Figure 8 is a sectional side view of a third embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention.
- Figure 9 is a rear view of a third embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention.
- Figure 10 is a front view of a fourth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention.
- Figure 11 is a sectional side view of a fourth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention
- Figure 12 is a rear view of a fourth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention
- Figure 13 is a front view of a fifth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention
- Figure 14 is a sectional side view of a fifth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention
- Figure 15 is a rear view of a fifth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention. Ways of carrying out the Invention
- the reference numeral 1 generally designates an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like.
- the selvage 1 comprises a frame 2 provided with at least one opening 3 and respective elements 4 for coupling to the installation jamb.
- the opening 3 comprises at least one unit 5 which interferes with the area delimited by the opening 3 and is arranged along the opening 3 so as to face it, in order to constitute a reduction of its width.
- the unit 5 advantageously yields with respect to external forcing actions directed toward a corresponding wall 6 of the installation opening 3.
- the mutual forcing of the latch (or bolt) and the wall 6 of the standard selvage forcing imposed by the elastic reaction, in case of thermal expansion, of the gasket that is present between the jamb and the door
- the adoption of the selvage 1 allows to avoid the increase in force for opening.
- the deformation of the unit 5 allows to keep within limit values the force of mutual incidence between the latch (or bolt) and the unit 5: an increase in the elastic reaction of the gasket is matched by a deformation of the unit 5, with a reduction of its protrusion with respect to the wall 6.
- the friction between the latch (or bolt) and the unit 5 remains in practice contained within a preset limit value as a function of the elastic yielding constant of the unit 5.
- the unit 5 yields with respect to external forcing actions directed toward the corresponding wall 6 of the installation opening 3, according to a predefined elastic constant chosen during design.
- the choice of the elastic yielding constant allows to determine the chosen interference of the unit with respect to the opening 3 as a function of the limit values provided for the external forcing actions. If the standards require keeping below a maximum value the force that needs to be applied to the handle (or panic bar or other opening element) to provide opening, it is possible to achieve this condition by choosing the unit 5 as a function of the elastic constant that allows to meet the indications of statutory provisions.
- the interfering unit 5 comprises an elongated element 7, which is substantially parallel and proximate to the wall 6 of the opening 3, and at least one yielding coupling 8 for fixing the element 7 to the frame 2.
- the yielding couplings 8 can be two, in order to provide a condition of optimum symmetry.
- the element 7 is movable, as a consequence of the deformations of the couplings 8, from a first configuration, in which the couplings 8 are inactive, for interference with the opening 3 and partial closure of the width of the opening 3, to a second configuration, in which the couplings 8 are deformed in substantial alignment with the wall 6, with maximum free width of the opening 3.
- the interfering unit 5 is an elastic body which is rigidly coupled to the frame 2 in at least one of its portions.
- the elastic body is itself deformable from a first configuration, in the absence of stresses applied thereto, for interference with the opening 3 and partial closure of the width of the opening 3, to a second configuration, in the presence of stresses applied thereto, of substantial alignment with the wall 6 of the opening 3, with maximum free width of the opening 3.
- the elastic body can be a profiled metallic stem 9, which has at least one end 10 stably coupled to the frame 2 and at least one part 11 which interferes with the opening 3.
- the profiled metallic stem 9 can engage stably, by means of its ends 19, means for fixing the frame 2 and the part 11 that interferes with the opening 3 can conveniently be the central one, which is suitably curved and protrudes with respect to the wall 6 of the opening 3 to which it is proximate.
- the profiled metallic stem 9 can likewise be engaged stably with its ends 10 on means for fixing the frame 2 and a part 12 that interferes with the opening 3 can be the one that corresponds to the vicinity of its centerline, which is conveniently contoured and protrudes with respect to the wall 6 of the opening 3 to which it is proximate.
- the elongated elements 7 of the interfering unit 5 are two, each arranged parallel to the respective wall 6 of the opening 3 and yieldingly associated with a fixed portion (substantially at the centerline) of the frame 2. It should be noted that in cases requiring adjustments of the selvage 1 after its installation, it is possible to provide apparatuses for adjusting the protrusion of the interfering unit 5 with respect to the wall 6.
- These adjustment apparatuses can comprise for example threaded elements which are incident to the unit 5: the movement of the elements entails a variation of the protrusion of the unit 5 with respect to the corresponding wall 6 of the opening 3.
Landscapes
- Specific Sealing Or Ventilating Devices For Doors And Windows (AREA)
Abstract
An optimized selvage (1) for doors with gaskets and the like, of the type that comprises a frame (2) provided with at least one opening (3), and respective elements (4) for coupling to the installation jamb. The opening (3) comprises at least one unit (5) which interferes with the opening (3) and is arranged along it so as to reduce the width of the opening (3). The unit (5) yields to external forcing actions directed toward the corresponding wall (6) of the installation o enin 3.
Description
OPTIMIZED SELVAGE FOR DOORS WITH GASKETS AND THE LIKE Technical Field
The present invention relates to an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like. Background Art
At each portion of a door in which a component of the lock (be it a bolt or a latch) is installed there must be a respective selvage (suitable to accommodate the bolt or latch) on the jamb.
Correct closure of the door is ensured by the optimum mating of each latch/bolt with the corresponding selvage.
In order to facilitate assembly, selvages are known which have elements for fixing to the jamb which are of an adjustable type and by means of which the selvage is aligned with the latch or bolt during assembly. In order to maintain the door in conditions of ideal thermal and acoustic insulation of the rooms that it divides, it is often convenient to fit gaskets along the surface of the jamb along which the door abuts. The gaskets, when the door is closed, are clamped between the lateral edge of the door and the jamb and therefore ensure the seal, preventing the passage of air between the rooms.
Clearly, the presence of this gasket, which must remain compressed, entails an elastic reaction thereof, which can affect the force with which the latch or bolt is forced against the wall of the selvage in the configuration in which the door is closed. In any case, upon thermal variations, even of a standard seasonal type
(therefore even without referring to installations which are particularly onerous in environmental and climate-related terms or in terms of refrigeration cells and the like), the gaskets and/or components can undergo dimensional variations (thermal contractions or expansions), with consequent modification of the closure conditions.
For example, a contraction of the gaskets will entail a great reduction in the mutual compression force between the latch or bolt and the corresponding wall of the selvage: in an extreme case, the gaskets might contract so much that they no longer ensure tightness even if the latch or bolt is inserted in the selvage. In this case, air passages (entailing draughts) will occur and ' the desired thermal and acoustic insulation will be compromised.
In case of expansion/dilation of the gaskets, the problems that can occur have even worse consequences. First of all, door closure can be degraded: the need to compress the gaskets more to close the door forces the application of greater force to close the door, since the reaction of the gasket tends to keep the latch or bolt away from the respective selvage.
Secondly (but in a fundamentally important way for correct operation of the lock installed on the door), the mutual forcing of the latch (or bolt) and the selvage wall (forcing imposed by the elastic reaction of the gasket in case of expansion) will require greater force on the handle (or on the panic bar or other opening element) in order to produce opening: the rotation of the handle (or the movement of the panic bar or other opening element) will in fact be hindered by friction between the latch (or bolt) and the wall of the selvage against which it is forced to rest. Since the friction force depends in a linear manner on the friction coefficient (which is constant) and on the perpendicular force that is applied, the increase in the elastic reaction of the gasket forces an obvious increase in the friction between the latch (or bolt) and the respective selvage.
Some statutory provisions (particularly in the case of doors installed on safety exit routes) require the handles to be actuatable by applying a force which does not exceed a predefined limit value.
The dimensional variations of the gaskets, as a consequence of thermal variations, can convert a lock which complies with statutory
provisions into a lock which requires an actuation force which is greater than the maximum one predefined by the statutory provisions and is therefore not adapted for that type of installation. Disclosure of the Invention The aim of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like with which it is possible to make the actuation force of the handle (or of the panic bar or other opening element) of the lock independent of gasket size variation phenomena.
Within this aim, an object of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like with which it is possible to ensure the perfect seal of the gaskets regardless of their size variations.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like which makes the behavior of the lock associated therewith independent of the size variations of any component of the lock, of the door and of the jamb.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like which has low costs, is relatively simple to provide in practice and is safe in application. This aim and these and other objects, which will become better apparent hereinafter, are achieved by the present optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like, of the type that comprises a frame provided with at least one opening, and respective elements for coupling to the installation jamb, characterized in that said opening comprises at least one unit which interferes with said opening and is arranged along it so as to face it, so as to reduce the width of said opening, said unit yielding to external forcing actions directed toward the corresponding wall of said installation opening. Brief description of the drawings Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will become
better apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred but not exclusive embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like, illustrated by way of non-limiting example in the accompanying drawings, wherein: Figure 1 is a front view of a first embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 2 is a sectional side view of a first embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention; Figure 3 is a rear view of a first embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 4 is a front view of a second embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 5 is a sectional side view of a second embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 6 is a rear view of a second embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 7 is a front view of a third embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 8 is a sectional side view of a third embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 9 is a rear view of a third embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 10 is a front view of a fourth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 11 is a sectional side view of a fourth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 12 is a rear view of a fourth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 13 is a front view of a fifth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention; Figure 14 is a sectional side view of a fifth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention;
Figure 15 is a rear view of a fifth embodiment of an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like according to the invention. Ways of carrying out the Invention
With reference to the figures, the reference numeral 1 generally designates an optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like.
The selvage 1 comprises a frame 2 provided with at least one opening 3 and respective elements 4 for coupling to the installation jamb. The opening 3 comprises at least one unit 5 which interferes with the area delimited by the opening 3 and is arranged along the opening 3 so as to face it, in order to constitute a reduction of its width.
The unit 5 advantageously yields with respect to external forcing actions directed toward a corresponding wall 6 of the installation opening 3. When the mutual forcing of the latch (or bolt) and the wall 6 of the standard selvage (forcing imposed by the elastic reaction, in case of thermal expansion, of the gasket that is present between the jamb and the door) would require a greater force on the handle (or on the panic bar or other opening element) in order to provide opening, the adoption of the selvage 1 allows to avoid the increase in force for opening.
In this case, the rotation of the handle (or the movement of the panic bar or other opening element) would in fact have been hindered by the friction between the latch (or bolt) and the wall of the standard selvage on which it is forced to rest. Since the friction force depends in a linear manner on the friction coefficient (which is constant) and on the applied
perpendicular force, the increase in the elastic reaction of the gasket would have imposed an obvious increase in the friction between the latch (or bolt) and the respective standard selvage.
With the selvage 1 according to the invention, instead, the deformation of the unit 5 allows to keep within limit values the force of mutual incidence between the latch (or bolt) and the unit 5: an increase in the elastic reaction of the gasket is matched by a deformation of the unit 5, with a reduction of its protrusion with respect to the wall 6. The friction between the latch (or bolt) and the unit 5 remains in practice contained within a preset limit value as a function of the elastic yielding constant of the unit 5.
Therefore, positively, the unit 5 yields with respect to external forcing actions directed toward the corresponding wall 6 of the installation opening 3, according to a predefined elastic constant chosen during design. The choice of the elastic yielding constant allows to determine the chosen interference of the unit with respect to the opening 3 as a function of the limit values provided for the external forcing actions. If the standards require keeping below a maximum value the force that needs to be applied to the handle (or panic bar or other opening element) to provide opening, it is possible to achieve this condition by choosing the unit 5 as a function of the elastic constant that allows to meet the indications of statutory provisions.
According to a possible embodiment, the interfering unit 5 comprises an elongated element 7, which is substantially parallel and proximate to the wall 6 of the opening 3, and at least one yielding coupling 8 for fixing the element 7 to the frame 2. In particular, it should be noted that the yielding couplings 8 can be two, in order to provide a condition of optimum symmetry.
In this case, the element 7 is movable, as a consequence of the deformations of the couplings 8, from a first configuration, in which the
couplings 8 are inactive, for interference with the opening 3 and partial closure of the width of the opening 3, to a second configuration, in which the couplings 8 are deformed in substantial alignment with the wall 6, with maximum free width of the opening 3. According to another possible embodiment of particular interest in practice and in application, the interfering unit 5 is an elastic body which is rigidly coupled to the frame 2 in at least one of its portions.
The elastic body is itself deformable from a first configuration, in the absence of stresses applied thereto, for interference with the opening 3 and partial closure of the width of the opening 3, to a second configuration, in the presence of stresses applied thereto, of substantial alignment with the wall 6 of the opening 3, with maximum free width of the opening 3.
In this embodiment, the elastic body can be a profiled metallic stem 9, which has at least one end 10 stably coupled to the frame 2 and at least one part 11 which interferes with the opening 3.
More specifically, the profiled metallic stem 9 can engage stably, by means of its ends 19, means for fixing the frame 2 and the part 11 that interferes with the opening 3 can conveniently be the central one, which is suitably curved and protrudes with respect to the wall 6 of the opening 3 to which it is proximate.
As an alternative, the profiled metallic stem 9 can likewise be engaged stably with its ends 10 on means for fixing the frame 2 and a part 12 that interferes with the opening 3 can be the one that corresponds to the vicinity of its centerline, which is conveniently contoured and protrudes with respect to the wall 6 of the opening 3 to which it is proximate.
According to another embodiment, shown in Figures 13, 14 and 15, the elongated elements 7 of the interfering unit 5 are two, each arranged parallel to the respective wall 6 of the opening 3 and yieldingly associated with a fixed portion (substantially at the centerline) of the frame 2. It should be noted that in cases requiring adjustments of the selvage 1
after its installation, it is possible to provide apparatuses for adjusting the protrusion of the interfering unit 5 with respect to the wall 6.
These adjustment apparatuses can comprise for example threaded elements which are incident to the unit 5: the movement of the elements entails a variation of the protrusion of the unit 5 with respect to the corresponding wall 6 of the opening 3.
It has thus been shown that the invention achieves the proposed aim and objects.
The invention thus conceived is susceptible of numerous modifications and variations, all of which are within the scope of the appended claims.
All the details may further be replaced with other technically equivalent ones.
In the exemplary embodiments shown, individual characteristics, given in relation to specific examples, may actually be interchanged with other different characteristics that exist in other exemplary embodiments.
Moreover, it is noted that anything found to be already known during the patenting process is understood not to be claimed and to be the subject of a disclaimer. In practice, the materials used, as well as the shapes and the dimensions, may be any according to requirements without thereby abandoning the scope of the protection of the appended claims.
Where technical features mentioned in any claim are followed by reference signs, those reference signs have been included for the sole purpose of increasing the intelligibility of the claims and accordingly such reference signs do not have any limiting effect on the interpretation of each element identified by way of example by such reference signs.
Claims
1. An optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like, of the type that comprises a frame (2) provided with at least one opening (3), and respective elements (4) for coupling to the installation jamb, characterized in that said opening (3) comprises at least one unit (5) which interferes with said opening (3) and is arranged along it so as to face it, so as to reduce the width of said opening (3), said unit (5) yielding to external forcing actions directed toward the corresponding wall (6) of said installation opening (3).
2. The selvage according to claim 1, characterized in that said interfering unit (5) comprises an elongated element (7), which is substantially parallel and proximate to a wall (6) of said opening (3), and at least one yielding coupling (8) for fixing said element (7) to said frame (2), as a consequence of the deformations of the coupling (8), said element (7) being movable from a first configuration, in which the coupling (8) is inactive, for interference with said opening (3) and partial closure of the width of said opening (3), to a second configuration, in which the coupling (8) is deformed and substantially aligned with said wall (6) of said opening (3), with maximum free width of said opening (3).
3. The selvage according to claim 1, characterized in that said interfering unit (5) is an elastic body which is rigidly coupled to said frame
(2) in at least one of its portions (10), said elastic body being deformable from a first configuration, in the absence of deforming stresses applied thereto, for interference with said opening (3) and partial closure of the width of said opening (3), to a second configuration, in the presence of stresses applied thereto, of substantial alignment with said wall (6) of said opening (3), with maximum free width of said opening (3).
4. The selvage according to claim 3, characterized in that said elastic body is a profiled metallic stem (9) which has at least one end (10) which is stably coupled to said frame (2) and at least one part thereof which interferes with said opening (3).
5. The selvage according to claim 4, characterized in that said profiled metallic stem (9) is stably engaged with its ends (10) on means for fixing said frame (2) and said part that interferes with said opening (3) is the central one (11), which is conveniently curved and protrudes with respect to the wall (6) of said opening (3) to which it is proximate.
6. The selvage according to claim 4, characterized in that said profiled metallic stem (9) is stably engaged with its ends (10) on means for fixing said frame (2) and said part that interferes with said opening (3) is the part that corresponds to the vicinity (12) of its centerline, which is conveniently contoured and protrudes with respect to the wall (6) of said opening (3) to which it is proximate.
7. The selvage according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that it comprises apparatuses for adjusting the protrusion of said interfering unit (5) with respect to the wall (6) of said opening (3).
8. The selvage according to claim 7, characterized in that said adjustment apparatuses comprise threaded elements which are incident to said unit (5), the movement of said elements entailing a variation of the protrusion of said unit (5) with respect to the corresponding wall (6) of said opening (3).
9. The selvage according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that said unit (5) yields with respect to external forcing actions directed toward the corresponding wall (6) of said installation opening according to a predefined elastic constant, in order to determine the desired interference as a function of the limit values provided for external forcing actions.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IT2008/000229 WO2009125436A1 (en) | 2008-04-08 | 2008-04-08 | Optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2279316A1 true EP2279316A1 (en) | 2011-02-02 |
Family
ID=39787817
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08763796A Withdrawn EP2279316A1 (en) | 2008-04-08 | 2008-04-08 | Optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2279316A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009125436A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL2005577C2 (en) * | 2010-10-26 | 2012-04-27 | Buva Rat Bouwprod Bv | Catch for a lock, assembly of a catch and lock and/or a closing element and a method for closing a closing element. |
DE102015204508A1 (en) | 2015-03-12 | 2016-09-15 | Aug. Winkhaus Gmbh & Co. Kg | Striker plate for an espagnolette fitting |
NL2016263B1 (en) * | 2016-02-15 | 2017-08-22 | Assa Abloy Nederland B V | Catch and a method for catching a locking element. |
NL2016481B1 (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2017-10-06 | Assa Abloy Nederland B V | Catch for catching a locking element. |
GB2559341B (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2020-08-05 | Bja Trading Ltd | Throw lock assemblies, throw bolt assemblies, and methods for assembling and using same |
GB2559189B (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2020-07-01 | Bja Trading Ltd | Throw lock assemblies and bolt keeper assemblies |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1113129A1 (en) * | 1999-12-23 | 2001-07-04 | Picard | Adjustable striker for a lock |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE313447C (en) * | ||||
GB419818A (en) | 1934-05-09 | 1934-11-20 | Hilary Fisher White | An improved device to be used in connection with striking plates for locks and latches |
GB475898A (en) * | 1936-05-29 | 1937-11-29 | George Frederick Crane | Improvements in or relating to latch or combined latch and lock fastenings for doors |
EP0252781A3 (en) * | 1986-06-06 | 1988-05-04 | Roger Courtois | Adjustable striker, and tamper-proof mounting means |
US4893854A (en) * | 1987-02-02 | 1990-01-16 | Masco Building Products Corp. | Self-adjusting door strike |
NL8700954A (en) * | 1987-04-22 | 1988-11-16 | Hendrikus Gerrit Van Den Brink | LOCKING STRUCTURE. |
-
2008
- 2008-04-08 EP EP08763796A patent/EP2279316A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2008-04-08 WO PCT/IT2008/000229 patent/WO2009125436A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1113129A1 (en) * | 1999-12-23 | 2001-07-04 | Picard | Adjustable striker for a lock |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2009125436A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2009125436A1 (en) | 2009-10-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2009125436A1 (en) | Optimized selvage for doors with gaskets and the like | |
US8800209B2 (en) | Door and system providing radio frequency shielding against high-altitude electromagnetic pulse | |
US20170175417A1 (en) | Door Strike Plate with Adjustable Subplate | |
KR101370516B1 (en) | Bracket of Door lock for Glass door and Installing Method thereof | |
KR101592149B1 (en) | Door system | |
KR20050088941A (en) | Automatic locking apparatus for an emergency escape door of a fire closure shutter | |
CN110612380B (en) | Sealing device for a movable sash as a movable lifting or pushing sash for a window or door | |
US20150204107A1 (en) | Door strike plate | |
KR200487136Y1 (en) | Stoper for fire dooe | |
GB0720718D0 (en) | Patio door | |
EP1344881B1 (en) | Adjustable striker plate | |
EP2267250B1 (en) | Striker plate for doors and windows | |
CN209398168U (en) | A kind of sash adapting to existing building aluminium alloy containing heat-insulating bridge-cut-off auxiliary frame | |
EP2202368B1 (en) | A handle body with a connection device, in particular a recessed handle | |
CN206158500U (en) | Window and door system | |
EP3004497B1 (en) | Keeps for doors or windows | |
EP3486415B1 (en) | Hinge system for external fixtures, such as window shutters or blinds including reinforcement device | |
DK180687B1 (en) | Bracket assembly for windows and doors | |
KR20090117252A (en) | Door glass mounting assembly | |
US20110095548A1 (en) | Door latch protector system and spacer | |
CN104632041B (en) | A kind of grain depot vent seal thermal insulating door thermally insulated door | |
US20080252085A1 (en) | Adjustable Strike | |
CN218438752U (en) | Pin block for stepless locking degree adjustment on driven sash of aluminum-clad wood door and window | |
KR102536377B1 (en) | Spring gasket for door frame with airtight function | |
JP6025517B2 (en) | Joinery |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20101026 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20121010 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20130221 |