[go: up one dir, main page]

EP2230560B1 - Excess toner evacuation process from a toner cartridge - Google Patents

Excess toner evacuation process from a toner cartridge Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2230560B1
EP2230560B1 EP09155788.4A EP09155788A EP2230560B1 EP 2230560 B1 EP2230560 B1 EP 2230560B1 EP 09155788 A EP09155788 A EP 09155788A EP 2230560 B1 EP2230560 B1 EP 2230560B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cartridge
toner
hole
section
hopper
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP09155788.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2230560A1 (en
Inventor
Jesus Gonzalez Perez
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Clover Technology Group LLC
Original Assignee
Clover Technology Group LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Clover Technology Group LLC filed Critical Clover Technology Group LLC
Priority to EP09155788.4A priority Critical patent/EP2230560B1/en
Publication of EP2230560A1 publication Critical patent/EP2230560A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2230560B1 publication Critical patent/EP2230560B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G15/00Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern
    • G03G15/06Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing
    • G03G15/08Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer
    • G03G15/0894Reconditioning of the developer unit, i.e. reusing or recycling parts of the unit, e.g. resealing of the unit before refilling with toner
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G2215/00Apparatus for electrophotographic processes
    • G03G2215/08Details of powder developing device not concerning the development directly
    • G03G2215/0875Arrangements for shipping or transporting of the developing device to or from the user
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G2221/00Processes not provided for by group G03G2215/00, e.g. cleaning or residual charge elimination
    • G03G2221/16Mechanical means for facilitating the maintenance of the apparatus, e.g. modular arrangements and complete machine concepts
    • G03G2221/163Mechanical means for facilitating the maintenance of the apparatus, e.g. modular arrangements and complete machine concepts for the developer unit

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to the field of laser printer toner cartridges, and more specifically, to repair and remanufacture of such toner cartridges.
  • Repairing and/or remanufacturing of a toner cartridge having a supply hopper section, a waste hopper section and a developer (or developing) section generally involve four main stages: (1) disassembly and cleaning; (2) assembly and replacement of defective parts; (3) refilling the cartridge with toner; and, (4) printing from the cartridge after it has been assembled (hereinafter referred to as post-printing).
  • the cartridge After the toner cartridge is remanufactured, including a supply hopper charged with a fresh supply of toner, and before the cartridge is shipped, typically the cartridge it tested to verify that all of the applicable components are working properly. This test is generally called a "post-print" of the toner cartridge. The most common way to achieve this is to actually use the cartridge to conduct a printing operation after it has been repaired or remanufactured. As the toner cartridge is printing pages, the printed pages are inspected to verify their quality and proper operation of the cartridge. This post-print test will show if any of the components need to be re-worked and/or changed before shipping the toner cartridge to the end user.
  • a magnetic roller will tend to hold on to most of the post-print toner by using a magnetic force, but a non-magnetic roller, once in the printer, will attract the toner using an electro-static charge. Once the cartridge is taken out of the printer, there is no charge applied to the roller, thus there is no electro-static forces between the roller and the toner causing the toner to fall off the roller. It has been discovered that the post-test toner in cartridges with non-magnetic rollers will tend to leak/sweat out during the shipping process.
  • JP 2002 251 119A discloses a method for reproducing process cartridge.
  • JP 2001 235996 discloses cleaning method and cleaning device for process cartridge.
  • US-A-5 839 028 discloses process cartridge and refilling method there for.
  • EP-A-1 416 333 discloses remanufacturing method of a toner supply container.
  • the process includes providing a hole in the cartridge developer section large enough to permit vacuuming the excess toner out of the cartridge.
  • the hole is at one end of the developer section of the cartridge.
  • the cartridge is oriented so that the hole is at a lower elevation relative to the majority of the cartridge so that gravity will assist in removing the excess toner.
  • the cartridge is vibrated during vacuuming to maximize dislodgement of toner inside of the cartridge developer section and further facilitate its removal.
  • the cartridge may be place in a fixture prior to vacuuming so that the entire fixture could be vibrated and oriented as desired.
  • the hole is then patched to prevent subsequent leakage of toner out of the cartridge.
  • excess toner is removed through cartridge toner hopper exit pull seal port located in the developer section.
  • the cartridge is oriented vertically, with the exit seal port at the lower end, and preferable is also placed in a fixture.
  • a vacuum nozzle shaped to conform to the shape of the exit seal port, is placed over the exit port and the excess toner is vacuumed out of the cartridge.
  • the fixture is preferably vibrated during vacuuming to facilitate removal of the toner.
  • the first process is referred to as the vacuum hole method and the second is referred to as the exit seal port method.
  • the exit vacuum hole method involves drilling a hole at location (22) in the cartridge developer section that is big enough to vacuum the excess toner in a reasonable amount of time out of the toner cartridge.
  • the toner found on the outer surface of the cartridge on one end of the roller is removed. That end is preferably the same end as is the exit pull seal port (24).
  • the port (24) penetrates to or opens into the inside of the developing section of the cartridge.
  • the cartridge can be vibrated during the vacuuming process in order to increase the rate at which the toner will be removed from the toner cartridge and maximize removal of excess toner.
  • the hole is preferably drilled into the cartridge developer section at the disassembly stage of the cartridge repair or remanufacturing process, in order to prevent damage to the internal components in the developing section. Furthermore, drilling the hole at this stage provides the ability to clean excess plastic burrs from the inside of the developing section before the cartridge is assembled.
  • the hole 28 has been drilled or otherwise made at location (22) shown in Figure 1 . After the hole (28) has been drilled, it is temporarily sealed during the rest of the remanufacturing process in order to prevent leakage of toner through the hole in the post-print test stage.
  • the hole is preferably and temporarily covered with a piece of tape, of any variety, so long as the tape functions to prevent leakage during post-test. After the post-print test has been completed, the temporary tape seal is removed. The excess toner is then vacuumed out of the cartridge.
  • vacuuming of the cartridge after post-test is accomplished by placing the cartridge on a holding fixture, preferably in a vertical orientation with the hole at a low elevation relative to the cartridge as a whole, and then vacuuming out the excess toner.
  • the vertical orientation tends to permit gravity to force the toner to drop to the bottom and thus closer to the exit hole 28 during vacuuming, as shown at location (32) in Figure 3B .
  • a vacuum nozzle (36) is used to vacuum out the excess toner from the cartridge (26) in the direction of the arrow (30) as shown in Figure 3A .
  • the hole (28) is located on the bottom side (32) of the cartridge developer section as shown in Figure 3B .
  • a vacuum nozzle (36) is positioned around and over the hole (28) and this is where the toner is to be removed, as shown at (34) in Figure 3C .
  • the vacuum process can either be accomplished on a vibrating fixture (not shown) to enhance the flow of toner to the vacuum nozzle, or be accomplished without vibration, for toner removal.
  • a seal patch (48) is applied to close and seal the hole (28).
  • Any seal, cover, plug or cap can be used to cover and seal the hole from leakage, as long as it doesn't interfere or damage the internal components of the printer, i.e., so long as it functions as a seal or plug only.
  • toner is removed via the toner hopper exit pull seal port.
  • the toner cartridge preferably is placed vertically.
  • the cartridge can be placed at any angle that is convenient in relation to the fixture that holds the cartridge in place.
  • the cartridge is vibrated in order to agitate and shake loose any toner that might be retained on post-test toner cartridge.
  • tapping the cartridge by hand will also cause the toner to fall to one end of the cartridge, thus, allowing for maximum removal of the excess toner to be removed by the vacuum nozzle as shown at (38).
  • the vacuum nozzle (38) is slipped into the toner hopper seal port (40) above the seal strip (44). Care must be taken that the nozzle does not damage or push the strip (44) back into the cartridge. At this point, vacuum is applied to suck out toner directly from the developer section in the direction shown by arrow (42) to remove the excess post-test toner through the hopper seal port (40).
  • the nozzle (38) can be custom shaped to correspond to the shape of the exit port of specific toner cartridge models or designs, by either machining or molding a generic design nozzle. The specific cartridge customized nozzle is slipped into the exit pull seal port (40) to allow the toner to be removed faster than with a generic nozzle.
  • FIG. 5A and 5B A simplified section view of a laser printer cartridge toner hopper tank supply section (52) and developer section (54) is shown (the waste hopper is not shown in Figures 5A and 5B ). Also, post-test toner (58) is shown lying on top of a toner supply hopper tank with the toner hopper pull seal strip (50) and hopper gasket seal dividing the sections at (56).
  • Figure 5B is a side perspective view of a toner cartridge, and includes the hopper section (52), the developer roller section (54) and the pull seal (50).
  • the post-test toner (58) shown on top of the toner hopper gasket at (56) and pull seal strip assembly (50) is to be evacuated.
  • Figure 5A both of the two different, and alternate vacuum nozzles (62), (64) are shown to graphically show the removal (58) of toner in simplified and comparative manner.
  • the arrows (66) and (68) at the end of the vacuum nozzles show the direction of vacuum removal of toner from the developer section (54). In both process the addition of vibration agitates the toner, and/or vertical orientation provides for quicker and better removal of post-test toner.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Dry Development In Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Electrophotography Configuration And Component (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF INVENTION
  • The invention relates generally to the field of laser printer toner cartridges, and more specifically, to repair and remanufacture of such toner cartridges.
  • BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
  • Repairing and/or remanufacturing of a toner cartridge having a supply hopper section, a waste hopper section and a developer (or developing) section generally involve four main stages: (1) disassembly and cleaning; (2) assembly and replacement of defective parts; (3) refilling the cartridge with toner; and, (4) printing from the cartridge after it has been assembled (hereinafter referred to as post-printing).
  • After the toner cartridge is remanufactured, including a supply hopper charged with a fresh supply of toner, and before the cartridge is shipped, typically the cartridge it tested to verify that all of the applicable components are working properly. This test is generally called a "post-print" of the toner cartridge. The most common way to achieve this is to actually use the cartridge to conduct a printing operation after it has been repaired or remanufactured. As the toner cartridge is printing pages, the printed pages are inspected to verify their quality and proper operation of the cartridge. This post-print test will show if any of the components need to be re-worked and/or changed before shipping the toner cartridge to the end user.
  • Most types of cartridges contain a seal that prevents the toner from leaking from the supply hopper section during shipping. In those instances, one cannot conduct a post print test since the toner in the toner hopper does not have accessibility to the developing section. To conduct this post-print test after the cartridge has been assembled, a small amount of toner, approximately 10 to 20 grams, is placed on the developing roller so the post-print procedure can be accomplished. After the post-print toner has been applied to the developing roller section, the toner cartridge assembly will be completed. The completed cartridge is then placed into an appropriate printer. Several standard test pages are printed, and these pages contain several, different graphic images that provide indications of the general condition of the cartridge. If any problem is revealed from the images shown on the printed graphics on the test pages, then the cartridge is removed and re-worked to fix or eliminate each of such problems. Although this test does use several grams of toner, it typically does not consume all of the toner that has been placed in the developing section of the cartridge.
  • During the post-test, an indication on the printing pages that most of the post-test toner has been used occurs when the pages start to show toner starvation. With magnetic toner developing systems an indication of toner starvation occurs when the post-test printing pages start to print white pages only. Nevertheless, the developer sections of these cartridges typically contain some residual toner, and this residual toner can be the source of the leakage or "sweating" problem described above. It has been discovered that this leakage or sweating problem is relatively less severe for cartridges containing magnetic toner developing systems, and relatively more severe or pronounced for cartridges containing non-magnetic toner developing systems, which are usually found in cartridges used in full-color printers containing colored toner.
  • The non magnetic toner developing system cartridges that have developer rollers that are not magnetic present a more serious problem simply because of that fact. A magnetic roller will tend to hold on to most of the post-print toner by using a magnetic force, but a non-magnetic roller, once in the printer, will attract the toner using an electro-static charge. Once the cartridge is taken out of the printer, there is no charge applied to the roller, thus there is no electro-static forces between the roller and the toner causing the toner to fall off the roller. It has been discovered that the post-test toner in cartridges with non-magnetic rollers will tend to leak/sweat out during the shipping process. Another major problem with the non-magnetic toner system is that since the toner doesn't hold to the developer roller once the cartridge is not in the printer, there is a chance that the excess will accumulate on other components, potentially causing permanent printing defects. Two major components that exhibit this problem are the PCR (Primary Charge Roller) and the OPC (Optical Photo Conductor).
  • PRIOR ART
  • JP 2002 251 119A discloses a method for reproducing process cartridge.
  • JP 2001 235996 discloses cleaning method and cleaning device for process cartridge.
  • US-A-5 839 028 discloses process cartridge and refilling method there for.
  • EP-A-1 416 333 discloses remanufacturing method of a toner supply container.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • To address the aforementioned problems processes described herein provide for removing excess toner left in a repaired or remanufactured laser printer toner cartridge after the cartridge has been through a post-printing test by vacuuming the excess toner out of the cartridge via the developer section. In one embodiment the process includes providing a hole in the cartridge developer section large enough to permit vacuuming the excess toner out of the cartridge. Preferably the hole is at one end of the developer section of the cartridge. Preferably the cartridge is oriented so that the hole is at a lower elevation relative to the majority of the cartridge so that gravity will assist in removing the excess toner. Also, preferably, the cartridge is vibrated during vacuuming to maximize dislodgement of toner inside of the cartridge developer section and further facilitate its removal. The cartridge may be place in a fixture prior to vacuuming so that the entire fixture could be vibrated and oriented as desired. The hole is then patched to prevent subsequent leakage of toner out of the cartridge.
  • In another embodiment excess toner is removed through cartridge toner hopper exit pull seal port located in the developer section. Preferably the cartridge is oriented vertically, with the exit seal port at the lower end, and preferable is also placed in a fixture. A vacuum nozzle, shaped to conform to the shape of the exit seal port, is placed over the exit port and the excess toner is vacuumed out of the cartridge. Also, the fixture is preferably vibrated during vacuuming to facilitate removal of the toner.
  • These and other embodiments, features, aspects, and advantages of the invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The foregoing aspects and the attendant advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
    • Figure 1 is a perspective view of a toner cartridge showing the location of an excess toner evacuation hole of a first embodiment.
    • Figure 2 is a perspective view, with enlarged area showing the exit hole of the Figure 1 embodiment;
    • Figure 3A is a perspective, vertically oriented view of the Figure 1 embodiment showing the vacuuming nozzle;
    • Figure 3B is a close-up, perspective view of the Figure 1 embodiment with the vacuuming nozzle about to be placed over the exit hole;
    • Figure 3C is a close-up, perspective view of the Figure 1 embodiment with the vacuuming nozzle placed over the exit hole;
    • Figure 4 is a perspective view of an alternate embodiment of the present vacuuming process;
    • Figure 5A is a schematic view showing the principles of the present process as simplified and applied to both the Figure 1 and Figure 4 embodiments;
    • Figure 5B is a side perspective view of the exterior of a cartridge as schematically shown in Figure 5A, and,
    • Figure 6 is a perspective view of a toner cartridge showing a cover for the exit hole.
  • Reference symbols or names are used in the Figures to indicate certain components, aspects or features shown therein. Reference symbols common to more than one Figure indicate like components, aspects or features shown therein.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • With reference to Figures 1-6 two embodiments of processes for evacuating excess toner from repaired or remanufactured laser printer toner cartridges after the post-test will be described. The first process is referred to as the vacuum hole method and the second is referred to as the exit seal port method.
  • Referring to Figure 1, the exit vacuum hole method involves drilling a hole at location (22) in the cartridge developer section that is big enough to vacuum the excess toner in a reasonable amount of time out of the toner cartridge. Specifically, the toner found on the outer surface of the cartridge on one end of the roller is removed. That end is preferably the same end as is the exit pull seal port (24). The port (24) penetrates to or opens into the inside of the developing section of the cartridge. Optionally, the cartridge can be vibrated during the vacuuming process in order to increase the rate at which the toner will be removed from the toner cartridge and maximize removal of excess toner.
  • Referring to Figure 2, the hole is preferably drilled into the cartridge developer section at the disassembly stage of the cartridge repair or remanufacturing process, in order to prevent damage to the internal components in the developing section. Furthermore, drilling the hole at this stage provides the ability to clean excess plastic burrs from the inside of the developing section before the cartridge is assembled. As shown in Figure 2, the hole 28 has been drilled or otherwise made at location (22) shown in Figure 1. After the hole (28) has been drilled, it is temporarily sealed during the rest of the remanufacturing process in order to prevent leakage of toner through the hole in the post-print test stage. The hole is preferably and temporarily covered with a piece of tape, of any variety, so long as the tape functions to prevent leakage during post-test. After the post-print test has been completed, the temporary tape seal is removed. The excess toner is then vacuumed out of the cartridge.
  • With reference to Figures 3A, 3B and 3C, vacuuming of the cartridge after post-test is accomplished by placing the cartridge on a holding fixture, preferably in a vertical orientation with the hole at a low elevation relative to the cartridge as a whole, and then vacuuming out the excess toner. The vertical orientation tends to permit gravity to force the toner to drop to the bottom and thus closer to the exit hole 28 during vacuuming, as shown at location (32) in Figure 3B. A vacuum nozzle (36) is used to vacuum out the excess toner from the cartridge (26) in the direction of the arrow (30) as shown in Figure 3A. The hole (28) is located on the bottom side (32) of the cartridge developer section as shown in Figure 3B. A vacuum nozzle (36) is positioned around and over the hole (28) and this is where the toner is to be removed, as shown at (34) in Figure 3C. The vacuum process can either be accomplished on a vibrating fixture (not shown) to enhance the flow of toner to the vacuum nozzle, or be accomplished without vibration, for toner removal.
  • Referring to Figure 6, once the excess toner has been removed, the area around the drilled hole (28) is cleaned and a seal patch (48) is applied to close and seal the hole (28). Any seal, cover, plug or cap can be used to cover and seal the hole from leakage, as long as it doesn't interfere or damage the internal components of the printer, i.e., so long as it functions as a seal or plug only.
  • With reference to Figure 4, and alternate method of removing excess toner from a laser printer cartridge will be described. This alternate method is referred to as the exit pull seal port method. In this method for removing the post-test toner from the developing section of a cartridge, toner is removed via the toner hopper exit pull seal port. In this method the toner cartridge preferably is placed vertically. Alternatively, the cartridge can be placed at any angle that is convenient in relation to the fixture that holds the cartridge in place. Also, preferably, the cartridge is vibrated in order to agitate and shake loose any toner that might be retained on post-test toner cartridge. Alternative, tapping the cartridge by hand will also cause the toner to fall to one end of the cartridge, thus, allowing for maximum removal of the excess toner to be removed by the vacuum nozzle as shown at (38).
  • During this method the vacuum nozzle (38) is slipped into the toner hopper seal port (40) above the seal strip (44). Care must be taken that the nozzle does not damage or push the strip (44) back into the cartridge. At this point, vacuum is applied to suck out toner directly from the developer section in the direction shown by arrow (42) to remove the excess post-test toner through the hopper seal port (40). Optionally, the nozzle (38) can be custom shaped to correspond to the shape of the exit port of specific toner cartridge models or designs, by either machining or molding a generic design nozzle. The specific cartridge customized nozzle is slipped into the exit pull seal port (40) to allow the toner to be removed faster than with a generic nozzle.
  • To illustrate the general toner evacuation process as presently described for two different embodiments, reference is made to Figures 5A and 5B. A simplified section view of a laser printer cartridge toner hopper tank supply section (52) and developer section (54) is shown (the waste hopper is not shown in Figures 5A and 5B). Also, post-test toner (58) is shown lying on top of a toner supply hopper tank with the toner hopper pull seal strip (50) and hopper gasket seal dividing the sections at (56). Figure 5B is a side perspective view of a toner cartridge, and includes the hopper section (52), the developer roller section (54) and the pull seal (50). The post-test toner (58) shown on top of the toner hopper gasket at (56) and pull seal strip assembly (50) is to be evacuated. In Figure 5A both of the two different, and alternate vacuum nozzles (62), (64) are shown to graphically show the removal (58) of toner in simplified and comparative manner. The arrows (66) and (68) at the end of the vacuum nozzles show the direction of vacuum removal of toner from the developer section (54). In both process the addition of vibration agitates the toner, and/or vertical orientation provides for quicker and better removal of post-test toner.
  • Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described, various modifications, alterations, alternative constructions, are also encompassed within the scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that additions, subtractions, deletions, and other modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.

Claims (10)

  1. A method, comprising:
    - providing a remanufactured laser printer toner cartridge (26) having a supply hopper section (52), a waste hopper section and a developer section (54), first end, a second end, an exit pull seal port (24, 40) located closer to the first end than to the second end, and a toner hopper pull seal strip (50) and hopper gasket seal dividing the supply hopper section and the developer section;
    - putting the remanufactured laser printer toner through a post-print test; and
    - removing from said remanufactured laser printer toner cartridge excess toner (58) left in said developer section after said cartridge has been through said post-printing test by vacuuming said excess toner out of the cartridge via the developer section with said toner hopper pull seal strip and said hopper gasket seal dividing the developer section (54) and the hopper section (52).
  2. Method according to claim 1, wherein removing excess toner from said remanufactured laser printer toner cartridge comprises:
    - creating a hole (28) in the cartridge that opens into the developer section and adjacent the exit pull seal port, the hole having a hole diameter;
    - providing a vacuum source;
    - providing a vacuum nozzle (36) having a nozzle diameter greater than the diameter of the hole in the cartridge;
    - providing a conduit from the vacuum source to the vacuum nozzle;
    - placing the vacuum nozzle over the hole;
    - activating the vacuum source; and,
    - vacuuming excess toner out of the cartridge.
  3. Method according to claim 2, further including placing the cartridge in a fixture prior to placing the vacuum nozzle over the hole.
  4. Method according to claim 2 or 3, further including covering the hole after vacuuming excess toner out of the cartridge.
  5. Method according to any of claims 2 to 4, wherein
    - providing said remanufactured laser printer toner cartridge comprises a disassembly stage; and
    - said hole in the cartridge that opens into the developer section is created at said disassembly stage.
  6. Method according to claim 5, wherein
    - said hole is temporarily sealed after it has been created; and
    - said sealing is removed after putting the remanufactured laser printer toner through a post-print test and before removing excess toner from said remanufactured laser printer toner cartridge.
  7. Method according to claim 1, wherein removing excess toner from said remanufactured laser printer toner cartridge comprises:
    - providing a vacuum source;
    - providing a vacuum nozzle (38) configured to extend over or to be slipped into the exit pull seal port (24, 40);
    - providing a conduit from the vacuum source to the vacuum nozzle;
    - placing the vacuum nozzle over the exit pull seal port (24), or slipping the vacuum nozzle into the toner hopper seal port (40) above the seal strip (44);
    - activating the vacuum source; and
    - vacuuming excess toner out of the cartridge.
  8. Method of claim 7, further including placing the cartridge in a fixture prior to placing the vacuum nozzle over the exit pull seal port.
  9. Method according to any of claims 1 to 8, further including vibrating the cartridge while vacuuming excess toner out of the cartridge.
  10. Method according to any of claims 1 to 9, further including orienting the cartridge in a generally vertical orientation prior to vacuuming and placing the first end of the cartridge at an elevation lower than the elevation of the second end of the cartridge.
EP09155788.4A 2009-03-20 2009-03-20 Excess toner evacuation process from a toner cartridge Not-in-force EP2230560B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09155788.4A EP2230560B1 (en) 2009-03-20 2009-03-20 Excess toner evacuation process from a toner cartridge

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09155788.4A EP2230560B1 (en) 2009-03-20 2009-03-20 Excess toner evacuation process from a toner cartridge

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2230560A1 EP2230560A1 (en) 2010-09-22
EP2230560B1 true EP2230560B1 (en) 2017-07-05

Family

ID=40957824

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09155788.4A Not-in-force EP2230560B1 (en) 2009-03-20 2009-03-20 Excess toner evacuation process from a toner cartridge

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2230560B1 (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080273894A1 (en) * 2007-05-01 2008-11-06 Yoel Wazana System and method for separating and repairing a laser toner cartridge

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0962079A (en) 1995-08-25 1997-03-07 Canon Inc Refilling method for process cartridge with toner and process cartridge
JP3847985B2 (en) * 1998-11-04 2006-11-22 キヤノン株式会社 Recycling method of toner supply container
JP2001235996A (en) 2000-02-24 2001-08-31 Ricoh Co Ltd Cleaning method and cleaning device for process cartridge
JP2002251119A (en) 2001-02-22 2002-09-06 Canon Inc Method for reproducing process cartridge
JP2003057933A (en) * 2001-08-09 2003-02-28 Canon Inc Reproducing method for process cartridge and cap member fitting structure
JP4047135B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2008-02-13 キヤノン株式会社 Reproduction method of toner supply container
CA2483325A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-04-22 Safonov Vladimir Vacuum cartridge cleaning machine
JP2006145931A (en) * 2004-11-22 2006-06-08 Kyocera Mita Corp Toner cartridge
US7505708B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2009-03-17 Future Graphics Imaging Corporation Methods and apparatus for remanufacturing toner cartridges

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080273894A1 (en) * 2007-05-01 2008-11-06 Yoel Wazana System and method for separating and repairing a laser toner cartridge

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2230560A1 (en) 2010-09-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11016418B2 (en) Method of remanufacturing a toner cartridge
US7962064B2 (en) Toner container and image forming apparatus comprising the same
KR100840598B1 (en) Toner Receptor and Toner Filling Method
CN1033934C (en) Developer cartridge
EP3210785A1 (en) Ink fill device, ink filling method, ink cartridge manufacturing method and ink cartridge
US7853173B2 (en) Excess toner evacuation process
EP2230560B1 (en) Excess toner evacuation process from a toner cartridge
US7088930B2 (en) Image forming apparatus and toner replenishing method
JP2008241771A (en) Toner refilling bag
US5907747A (en) Prefilled, presealed toner cartridge insert
CN1746033A (en) How to Recycle Liquid Cartridges
JPH10207322A (en) Process cartridge
JP2011186102A (en) Toner supply device and image forming apparatus with the same
JP2005092123A (en) Method for recycling process cartridge, process cartridge recycled by the same, method for recycling toner cartridge, and toner cartridge recycled by the same
JP2003263014A (en) Toner replenishing container
JPH07306576A (en) Toner container and cleaning method thereof
JP5169206B2 (en) Photomask acceptor and resist inspection method and apparatus using the same
US10429767B2 (en) System and method of remanufacturing a toner container
JPH06222663A (en) Developer supply device
JP2002351199A (en) Toner replenishment bottle
CN101546154B (en) Liquid material coating method and developing agent holding unit assembling method
JP2006259452A (en) Image forming apparatus
JP3277177B2 (en) Toner bottle
JP3154592B2 (en) Resealing member for developer container, method for resealing developer container using this reseal member, method for resealing process cartridge
US9946199B1 (en) System and method of filling a toner container

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110318

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20110408

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170210

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 907001

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009046935

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 907001

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171005

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171005

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171105

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171006

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009046935

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180320

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180320

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180320

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602009046935

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: ARNOLD & SIEDSMA, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602009046935

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: CLOVER IMAGING GROUP, LLC, HOFFMAN ESTATES, US

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC, OTTAWA, ILL., US

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20200402 AND 20200408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20090320

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170705

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170705

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20210323

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210319

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20210324

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009046935

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220320

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220320

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221001