EP2172394B9 - Automatic anti-roll stabilization system of a watercraft - Google Patents
Automatic anti-roll stabilization system of a watercraft Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2172394B9 EP2172394B9 EP09171591.2A EP09171591A EP2172394B9 EP 2172394 B9 EP2172394 B9 EP 2172394B9 EP 09171591 A EP09171591 A EP 09171591A EP 2172394 B9 EP2172394 B9 EP 2172394B9
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- watercraft
- electric motor
- stabilizing fin
- actuator assembly
- stabilizing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000368 destabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B39/00—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
- B63B39/06—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water
- B63B39/061—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water by using trimflaps, i.e. flaps mounted on the rear of a boat, e.g. speed boat
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an automatic anti-roll system for the stabilization of the rolling of a watercraft, comprising a stabilizing fin that can turn about an axis, sensor means for detecting the motions of roll of the watercraft, and a control device for governing rotation of said fin about said axis as a function of signals supplied by said sensor means.
- Stabilizing fins are basically hydrodynamic profiles (similar to airfoil profiles), which are mounted in a transverse direction with respect to the hull in order to reduce the transverse motions of roll (rotations about the longitudinal axis of the hull) induced by the action of the waves.
- the hydrodynamic profile impinged upon by the flow of water in relative motion with respect to the hull generates a force of hydrodynamic lift that varies, among other things, as a function of the angle of incidence of the profile.
- the stabilizing fin is associated to a control device that varies the angle of incidence of the hydrodynamic profile as a function of signals indicating rolling of the watercraft.
- the stabilizing fin is associated to a mechanical actuator having a rotating shaft, the bottom end of which comes out of the hull and is connected to the stabilizing fin.
- the top part of the shaft of the mechanical actuator is fixed to a rocker, to which two hydraulic cylinders are mechanically connected.
- the linear motion of the hydraulic cylinders is converted into a motion of rotation of the shaft of the mechanical actuator via the rocker, which also has the function of torque amplifier.
- the motion of the hydraulic cylinders is ensured by an on-board hydraulic system governed by a proportional directional valve.
- the proportional valve receives a voltage signal of +/-10 V processed by an electronic control system.
- the electronic control system comprises a control panel containing a regulator of a PLC type.
- the electronic control system is associated to a system of sensors for detecting motions of roll, comprising an inclinometer that measures the angle of roll and a gyroscope that measures the speed of roll.
- the electronic regulator processes the signal supplied by the sensors and generates a voltage signal that determines opening of the proportional valve.
- the flow of oil that traverses the proportional valve governs linear advance of the cylinders and hence rotation of the rocker. There follows a rotation of the axis of the mechanical actuator and hence of the stabilizing fin.
- Corresponding to the presumed new angle of incidence is a new value of the force of hydrodynamic lift and hence of the rectifying moment generated on the watercraft. Said rectifying moment tends to offset the destabilizing moment generated by the impact of the waves on the watercraft.
- the dynamic response of the electronic regulating system is certainly better than the performance required. Also the mechanical actuator in practice can yield good results in terms of dynamic response.
- the critical aspect of the system is represented by the dynamic behaviour of the hydraulic system.
- US-A-4926778 discloses a high speed planing watercraft including a pitch stabilization system having variable pitch airfoils controlled by a control system.
- US-A-3371642 discloses a trim control device for boats including a pair of rearwardly extending plates on the stern of the boat, which form extensions on the bottom surface area thereof.
- US-A-3020869 discloses an anti-roll stabilizing system for marine vessels including an anti-roll stabilizing fin driven by an hydraulic motor connected to an hydraulic pump by means of hydraulic lines.
- GB 999 306 discloses an anti-roll stabilizing system for marine vessels including an anti-roll stabilizing fin driven by an electric motor.
- the present invention relates to an automatic anti-roll system for the stabilization of the rolling of a watercraft according to the preamble of Claim 1, which is known, e.g. from document B. Stafford et al. "Technology development for steering and stabilizers" in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for Maritime Environment 2008, 222, 41 .
- Document EP 1 577 210 A1 may also be of interest for the instant invention.
- the object of the present invention is to provide an automatic anti-roll system for the stabilization of the rolling of a watercraft that will enable the aforesaid problems to be overcome.
- the electronic regulating system of the system according to the present invention is simpler and at the same time more flexible and powerful than the electronic systems used for control of oleodynamic systems.
- the electronic control system associated to an electric motor enables creation of new, very sophisticated, and highly adaptive algorithms of regulation. This aspect is of fundamental importance for providing a stabilizing system at anchor without penalizing the system as a whole, as occurs in traditional solutions.
- the stabilizing system 10 comprises a stabilizing fin 12, an actuator assembly 14 and an electronic regulating system 16.
- the stabilizing fin 12 is able to turn about an axis 18 and is shaped according to a hydrodynamic profile.
- the actuator assembly 14 is designed to govern rotation of the stabilizing fin 12 about the axis 18.
- the actuator assembly 14 comprises a fixed support 20, rotatably supported within which is a shaft 22, to which the stabilizing fin 12 is fixed.
- a shaft 22 to which the stabilizing fin 12 is fixed.
- two taper bearings 24 are provided for support of the shaft 22.
- the actuator assembly 14 comprises an electric motor 26 and a motor reducer28.
- the electric motor 26 is preferably constituted by a permanent-magnet d.c. electric motor (brushless motor).
- the motor reducer28 is preferably an epicyclic motor reducer with input and output at 90° apart.
- the input shaft of the motor reducer 28 is fitted on the output shaft of the electric motor 26.
- the output shaft of the motor reducer 28 is fixed with respect to the shaft 22 that bears the stabilizing fin 12.
- the electronic regulating system 16 comprises sensor means 30 for detecting the motions of rolling of the watercraft, a microprocessor regulating unit 32, and a driving unit 34.
- the sensor means 30 preferably comprise at least one sensor for detecting the angle of roll and at least one sensor for detecting the speed of roll.
- the sensor of the angle of roll can be an inclinometer, and the sensor of the speed of roll can be a gyroscope.
- the microprocessor regulating unit 32 receives the data on the motions of roll of the watercraft and processes the reference signals to be sent to the driving unit 34.
- the driving unit 34 carries out a control of the angular position of the stabilizing fin 12 by means of an absolute encoder 36 mounted on the shaft of the electric motor 26.
- the electronic regulating system 16 enables adjustment of the stabilizing fin 12 in a way that is far more sophisticated than is possible with electro-hydraulic systems according to the known art.
- Traditional PLC regulators supply only a voltage signal corresponding to an angle of rotation of the fin, from which there is presumed a force of hydrodynamic lift generated by the profile and hence a torque that counters the torque of roll.
- the regulating system 16 With the regulating system 16 according to the present invention it is possible to carry out control of different reference values of the electric motor 26, amongst which: power, torque, speed, position, power absorption/ load.
- the electronic regulating system 16 can create algorithms and laws of control not only as a function of the disturbance generated by the waves but, above all, as a function of the actual responses of the watercraft. This aspect is fundamental for the construction of a good stabilizing system at anchor, without penalizing the system as a whole, as occurs in the known art.
- the adjustment of the stabilizing fin 12 is based upon hydrodynamic laws, assuming that the actual operation approaches the calculated one. This approach, however, neglects a series of phenomena, amongst which the interference between the hull and the stabilizing fin, that are difficult to evaluate with numerical simulations or tank tests.
- the system according to the present invention it is possible to monitor the operating parameters of the actuator assembly 14 easily (power, torque, speed, position, power absorption/load). This enables evaluation of the real dynamic behaviour of the stabilizing fin 12 and identification of its dynamics.
- the real operating data enable identification of the hydrodynamic profiles used and enable the due modifications to be made.
- the advantages that derive from the use of the stabilizing system according to the present invention are the following:
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
- Control Of Transmission Device (AREA)
- Connection Of Motors, Electrical Generators, Mechanical Devices, And The Like (AREA)
- Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)
- Supply Devices, Intensifiers, Converters, And Telemotors (AREA)
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
- Paper (AREA)
- Rolls And Other Rotary Bodies (AREA)
- Fluid-Pressure Circuits (AREA)
- Adjustment Of Camera Lenses (AREA)
- General Induction Heating (AREA)
- Studio Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to an automatic anti-roll system for the stabilization of the rolling of a watercraft, comprising a stabilizing fin that can turn about an axis, sensor means for detecting the motions of roll of the watercraft, and a control device for governing rotation of said fin about said axis as a function of signals supplied by said sensor means.
- Stabilizing fins are basically hydrodynamic profiles (similar to airfoil profiles), which are mounted in a transverse direction with respect to the hull in order to reduce the transverse motions of roll (rotations about the longitudinal axis of the hull) induced by the action of the waves. The hydrodynamic profile impinged upon by the flow of water in relative motion with respect to the hull generates a force of hydrodynamic lift that varies, among other things, as a function of the angle of incidence of the profile. The stabilizing fin is associated to a control device that varies the angle of incidence of the hydrodynamic profile as a function of signals indicating rolling of the watercraft.
- In traditional solutions, the stabilizing fin is associated to a mechanical actuator having a rotating shaft, the bottom end of which comes out of the hull and is connected to the stabilizing fin. The top part of the shaft of the mechanical actuator is fixed to a rocker, to which two hydraulic cylinders are mechanically connected. The linear motion of the hydraulic cylinders is converted into a motion of rotation of the shaft of the mechanical actuator via the rocker, which also has the function of torque amplifier.
- A typical system of anti-roll stabilization of a known type is characterized by the following operating parameters:
- angular motion of the stabilizing fin with respect to its central position: +/- 30°;
- driving speed: between 22°/s up to a maximum of 60°/s;
- driving at high torque and low power;
- maximum speed of rotation: 6-8g/1'.
- The motion of the hydraulic cylinders is ensured by an on-board hydraulic system governed by a proportional directional valve. The proportional valve receives a voltage signal of +/-10 V processed by an electronic control system.
- In the known solutions, the electronic control system comprises a control panel containing a regulator of a PLC type. The electronic control system is associated to a system of sensors for detecting motions of roll, comprising an inclinometer that measures the angle of roll and a gyroscope that measures the speed of roll.
- The electronic regulator processes the signal supplied by the sensors and generates a voltage signal that determines opening of the proportional valve. The flow of oil that traverses the proportional valve governs linear advance of the cylinders and hence rotation of the rocker. There follows a rotation of the axis of the mechanical actuator and hence of the stabilizing fin. Corresponding to the presumed new angle of incidence is a new value of the force of hydrodynamic lift and hence of the rectifying moment generated on the watercraft. Said rectifying moment tends to offset the destabilizing moment generated by the impact of the waves on the watercraft.
- The performance of the entire stabilizing system is markedly affected by the dynamic response of the following three subassemblies:
- mechanical actuator and stabilizing fin;
- hydraulic control system;
- electronic regulating system.
- The dynamic response of the electronic regulating system is certainly better than the performance required. Also the mechanical actuator in practice can yield good results in terms of dynamic response. The critical aspect of the system is represented by the dynamic behaviour of the hydraulic system.
- The design and construction of the hydraulic control system is subject to numerous constraints, amongst which:
- need to use standard oleodynamic elements available on the market;
- head losses generated by the system of tubes and within the proportional regulating valve;
- noise of the system, which limits the working pressure to values of not higher than 120-135 bar;
- low efficiency of the oleodynamic system (the efficiency between the installed power of the motor and the shaft of the mechanical actuator is lower than 50%);
- need to provide a cooling system for dissipating the heat generated by the losses of efficiency; and
- weight and complexity of the oleodynamic system, and difficulty of installation and of management.
- The aforesaid constraints affect and penalize the dynamic response of the hydraulic control system and consequently the entire stabilizing system.
- The majority of stabilizing systems used today envisage the option of stabilization at anchor, i.e., with the watercraft stationary. In these conditions, since the speed of the flow that impinges upon the hydrodynamic profile is practically zero, the amplifying effect of the force of hydrodynamic lift ceases, and the mode of control is purely of an impulsive nature. Frequently, the motions of stabilization at anchor are at a high frequency, so that it is necessary to have available a actuation system with a high dynamic range. This calls for an available power higher than the one used in navigation.
- To achieve a good stabilization at anchor it is indispensable to be able to turn the stabilizing fin at a high speed, in the region of 45-60°/s. To obtain these performance levels, the hydraulic control system must work at a high power and, in these conditions, there are high levels of dissipation. The efficiency of the hydraulic transmission in these operating conditions is estimated in the region of 30-35%. In such conditions, also the dynamic loads to which the mechanical actuator is subjected become high, and this entails an oversizing of the mechanics and hence an increase in the inertias of the mechanical actuator system. This markedly penalizes the dynamic response of the entire system, rendering at times impossible the use of such a system for the function of stabilization at anchor.
-
US-A-4926778 discloses a high speed planing watercraft including a pitch stabilization system having variable pitch airfoils controlled by a control system. -
US-A-3371642 discloses a trim control device for boats including a pair of rearwardly extending plates on the stern of the boat, which form extensions on the bottom surface area thereof. -
US-A-3020869 discloses an anti-roll stabilizing system for marine vessels including an anti-roll stabilizing fin driven by an hydraulic motor connected to an hydraulic pump by means of hydraulic lines. -
GB 999 306 - More specifically, the present invention relates to an automatic anti-roll system for the stabilization of the rolling of a watercraft according to the preamble of Claim 1, which is known, e.g. from document B. Stafford et al. "Technology development for steering and stabilizers" in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for Maritime Environment 2008, 222, 41. Document
EP 1 577 210 A1 may also be of interest for the instant invention. - The object of the present invention is to provide an automatic anti-roll system for the stabilization of the rolling of a watercraft that will enable the aforesaid problems to be overcome.
- According to the present invention, this object is achieved by an automatic anti-roll system according to claim 1.
- The electronic regulating system of the system according to the present invention is simpler and at the same time more flexible and powerful than the electronic systems used for control of oleodynamic systems.
- The electronic control system associated to an electric motor enables creation of new, very sophisticated, and highly adaptive algorithms of regulation. This aspect is of fundamental importance for providing a stabilizing system at anchor without penalizing the system as a whole, as occurs in traditional solutions.
- Further characteristics and advantages of the present invention will emerge clearly in the course of the ensuing detailed description, which is provided purely by way of non-limiting example with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
-
Figure 1 is a schematic perspective view of a system for anti-roll stabilization of watercraft according to the present invention; -
Figure 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view according to the line II-II ofFigure 1 ; and -
Figure 3 is an exploded perspective view of the actuator assembly designated by the arrow III inFigure 1 . - With reference to
Figure 1 , designated as a whole by 10 is an automatic system for anti-roll stabilization of watercraft. The stabilizingsystem 10 comprises a stabilizingfin 12, anactuator assembly 14 and anelectronic regulating system 16. - The stabilizing
fin 12 is able to turn about anaxis 18 and is shaped according to a hydrodynamic profile. Theactuator assembly 14 is designed to govern rotation of the stabilizingfin 12 about theaxis 18. - As illustrated in greater detail in
Figures 2 and3 , theactuator assembly 14 comprises afixed support 20, rotatably supported within which is ashaft 22, to which the stabilizingfin 12 is fixed. Preferably, twotaper bearings 24 are provided for support of theshaft 22. - The
actuator assembly 14 according to the present invention comprises anelectric motor 26 and a motor reducer28. Theelectric motor 26 is preferably constituted by a permanent-magnet d.c. electric motor (brushless motor). The motor reducer28 is preferably an epicyclic motor reducer with input and output at 90° apart. The input shaft of themotor reducer 28 is fitted on the output shaft of theelectric motor 26. The output shaft of themotor reducer 28 is fixed with respect to theshaft 22 that bears the stabilizingfin 12. - The
electronic regulating system 16 comprises sensor means 30 for detecting the motions of rolling of the watercraft, amicroprocessor regulating unit 32, and a drivingunit 34. - The sensor means 30 preferably comprise at least one sensor for detecting the angle of roll and at least one sensor for detecting the speed of roll. The sensor of the angle of roll can be an inclinometer, and the sensor of the speed of roll can be a gyroscope. The
microprocessor regulating unit 32 receives the data on the motions of roll of the watercraft and processes the reference signals to be sent to the drivingunit 34. Preferably, the drivingunit 34 carries out a control of the angular position of the stabilizingfin 12 by means of anabsolute encoder 36 mounted on the shaft of theelectric motor 26. - The
electronic regulating system 16 according to the present invention enables adjustment of the stabilizingfin 12 in a way that is far more sophisticated than is possible with electro-hydraulic systems according to the known art. Traditional PLC regulators supply only a voltage signal corresponding to an angle of rotation of the fin, from which there is presumed a force of hydrodynamic lift generated by the profile and hence a torque that counters the torque of roll. - With the regulating
system 16 according to the present invention it is possible to carry out control of different reference values of theelectric motor 26, amongst which: power, torque, speed, position, power absorption/ load. - The reading and control of the aforesaid parameters enables creation of very sophisticated and highly adaptive algorithms of regulation.
- Thanks to the fact that the
actuator assembly 14 has a high dynamics and supplies satisfactory responses over a wide range of operating frequencies, theelectronic regulating system 16 can create algorithms and laws of control not only as a function of the disturbance generated by the waves but, above all, as a function of the actual responses of the watercraft. This aspect is fundamental for the construction of a good stabilizing system at anchor, without penalizing the system as a whole, as occurs in the known art. - In the traditional solutions with oleodynamic control, the adjustment of the stabilizing
fin 12 is based upon hydrodynamic laws, assuming that the actual operation approaches the calculated one. This approach, however, neglects a series of phenomena, amongst which the interference between the hull and the stabilizing fin, that are difficult to evaluate with numerical simulations or tank tests. - With the system according to the present invention it is possible to monitor the operating parameters of the
actuator assembly 14 easily (power, torque, speed, position, power absorption/load). This enables evaluation of the real dynamic behaviour of the stabilizingfin 12 and identification of its dynamics. The real operating data enable identification of the hydrodynamic profiles used and enable the due modifications to be made. - As compared to the known art, the advantages that derive from the use of the stabilizing system according to the present invention are the following:
- the
actuator assembly 14 has a better dynamics as compared to actuators of a mechanical type; - the coefficient of efficiency of the control device is higher, and a reduction of the installed power is consequently obtained;
- a reduction of the dynamic loads on the
actuator 14 is obtained: in fact, the loads act exclusively in the axial direction, and there are no mechanical linkages subjected to high dynamic loads; - a reduction of the structural loads on the hull is obtained;
- a drastic reduction of the noise is obtained, and hence a higher comfort on board;
- a better dynamics of the system is achieved, so that it is possible to obtain a regulator with higher performance both in navigation and in stabilization at anchor;
- installation on board is simplified as compared to the known solutions since no intervention of skilled labour is required;
- a better reliability of the system is achieved thanks to the smaller number of components installed (in the oleodynamic system according to the known art
- Tests conducted by the present applicant show that the
actuator assembly 14 with electric motor and motor reducer affords a higher performance than an oleodynamic actuator according to the known art. The lower power losses of the electric motor moreover enable variation of the controller gains so as to improve further the efficiency of the system. This enables an adaptive controller to be obtained that is able to pass from one configuration of gains to a different one as required. - Of course, without prejudice to the principle of the invention, the details of construction and the embodiments may vary widely with respect to what is described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the ensuing claims.
Claims (3)
- An automatic anti-roll system for the stabilization of the rolling of a watercraft at anchor, comprising:- a stabilizing fin (12) that can turn about an axis (18), the stabilizing fin (12) being configured for being mounted in a transverse direction with respect to the hull of the watercraft and having a hydrodynamic profile which, in use, is impinged upon by the flow of water in relative motion with respect to the hull to generate a force of hydrodynamic lift;- an actuator assembly (14), designed to govern rotation of said stabilizing fin (12) about said axis (18); and- a regulating system (16), designed to govern said actuator assembly (14) as a function of signals indicating rolling of the watercraft, said regulation system (16) comprising sensor means (30), designed to supply a signal indicating rolling of the watercraft, wherein said regulating system is arranged for carrying out control of the angular position of the stabilizing fin (12) by means of an encoder (36) and comprises :characterized in that:- a microprocessor regulating unit (32), designed to process the data on rolling of the watercraft supplied by said sensor means (30); and- a driving unit (34) for governing said electric motor (16);a) said actuator assembly (14) comprises an electric motor (26) connected to said stabilizing fin (12) via an epicyclic reduction gear (28), wherein an input shaft of said reduction gear (28) is fitted on an output shaft of said electric motor (26) and an output shaft of said reduction gear (28) is fixed with respect to a shaft (22) that bears said stabilizing fin (12), and thatb) said encoder (36) is associated to said electric motor (26).
- The system according to Claim 1, characterized in that the regulating system (16) is arranged for controlling one or more of the following operating parameters of the electric motor (26): power, torque, speed, position, electrical power input, load.
- The system according to Claim 1, characterized in that said electric motor (26) is a permanent-magnet d.c. motor.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL09171591T PL2172394T5 (en) | 2008-10-02 | 2009-09-29 | Automatic anti-roll stabilization system of a watercraft |
HRP20120531TT HRP20120531T4 (en) | 2008-10-02 | 2012-06-27 | Automatic anti-roll stabilization system of a watercraft |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IT000725A ITTO20080725A1 (en) | 2008-10-02 | 2008-10-02 | ANTI-ROLLIO AUTOMATIC STABILIZATION SYSTEM FOR BOATS |
Publications (4)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2172394A1 EP2172394A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 |
EP2172394B1 EP2172394B1 (en) | 2012-04-04 |
EP2172394B2 EP2172394B2 (en) | 2016-07-13 |
EP2172394B9 true EP2172394B9 (en) | 2017-01-25 |
Family
ID=40834275
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP09171591.2A Active EP2172394B9 (en) | 2008-10-02 | 2009-09-29 | Automatic anti-roll stabilization system of a watercraft |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100083887A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2172394B9 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE552165T1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2172394T4 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2384363T5 (en) |
HR (1) | HRP20120531T4 (en) |
IT (1) | ITTO20080725A1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL2172394T5 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT201800007927A1 (en) * | 2018-08-07 | 2020-02-07 | Verme Projects Srl | STABILIZATION EQUIPMENT FOR BOATS |
DE102020208770A1 (en) | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-20 | Skf Marine Gmbh | contraption |
IT202000021328A1 (en) | 2020-09-09 | 2022-03-09 | MVM Holding Srl | STABILIZATION EQUIPMENT FOR BOATS |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT1401941B1 (en) * | 2010-09-17 | 2013-08-28 | Rodriquez Marine System Srl | DEVICE FOR BOATS |
ITTO20120472A1 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2013-12-01 | Cmc Marine S R L | CONTROL PROCEDURE FOR ANTI-ROLLOUS STABILIZATION OF BOATS, ITS STABILIZATION SYSTEM AND IT PRODUCT |
CN105121272B (en) * | 2013-04-18 | 2017-06-23 | 罗尼·斯考恩 | Fin stabilizer and active stabilization system for a ship |
CN103803032A (en) * | 2014-02-28 | 2014-05-21 | 扬州市江都永坚有限公司 | Electric driving fin stabilizing device |
JP6479397B2 (en) * | 2014-10-09 | 2019-03-06 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Method for dehydrating hydraulic fluid of fin stabilizer and fin stabilizer |
US9944363B2 (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2018-04-17 | Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. | Electric fin stabilizer |
FR3032683B1 (en) | 2015-02-17 | 2017-05-26 | Elisabeth Fournier | SHIP STABILIZATION SYSTEM |
EP3298302B1 (en) | 2015-05-22 | 2019-10-16 | Humphree AB | An adjustable device and a boat provided with a stabilizing device |
ITUB20169851A1 (en) * | 2016-01-07 | 2016-04-07 | Psc Eng S R L | METHOD OF ATTENUATION OF THE SWINGING OF A BOAT. |
ITUB20160510A1 (en) * | 2016-01-25 | 2017-07-25 | Aroldo Trivelli | ELECTROMECHANICAL COMPLEX FOR THE CONTROL OF A STABILIZING FINISHING STRUCTURE FOR BOATS |
CN105775064B (en) * | 2016-04-01 | 2017-08-11 | 江苏科技大学 | A kind of Ship Steering Autopilot with semi-actively controlled used appearance structure |
PL3658453T3 (en) | 2017-07-24 | 2022-06-13 | Cmc Marine S.R.L. | Stabilization system for a watercraft |
US10625831B2 (en) * | 2017-12-15 | 2020-04-21 | Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. | Fin stabilizer |
US11685485B2 (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2023-06-27 | Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. | Fin stabilizer |
CN110015387B (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2021-08-20 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | An anti-rolling device suitable for low-speed ships |
CN110356525A (en) * | 2019-08-07 | 2019-10-22 | 上海衡拓船舶设备有限公司 | Electricity with retarder drives fin stabilizer |
EP3936425A1 (en) * | 2020-07-10 | 2022-01-12 | Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. | Fin stabilizer |
CN112937790A (en) * | 2021-03-29 | 2021-06-11 | 上海衡拓船舶设备有限公司 | Unmanned ship fin stabilizer actuating mechanism based on bevel gear transmission |
NO346599B1 (en) * | 2021-08-02 | 2022-10-24 | Sleipner Motor As | Vessel stabilizer |
KR102673066B1 (en) * | 2022-01-04 | 2024-07-08 | 주식회사 비에스이 | Sail yacht operating by solar power |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2942570A (en) † | 1954-10-13 | 1960-06-28 | Kollenberger Walter Michael | Devices for damping the rolling movement of ships |
US3020869A (en) * | 1959-08-12 | 1962-02-13 | Sperry Rand Corp | Activated fin ship stabilizer |
DE1155994B (en) | 1960-12-31 | 1963-10-17 | Siemens Ag | Device for stabilizing ships using steered, retractable fins |
US3371642A (en) * | 1965-10-15 | 1968-03-05 | William M. Joy | Trim control device for boats |
DK126580B (en) | 1967-01-24 | 1973-07-30 | Blohm Voss Ag | Winding damping systems for ships. |
DE1267127B (en) | 1967-01-24 | 1968-04-25 | Blohm Voss Ag | Anti-roll system for ships |
US4644893A (en) * | 1984-08-06 | 1987-02-24 | International Hydraulic Systems, Inc. | Position indicating apparatus for use in a boat leveling system |
US4926778A (en) * | 1988-07-05 | 1990-05-22 | Johnston Daniel D | Aerodynamic stabilization system for watercraft |
US5235930A (en) | 1992-05-08 | 1993-08-17 | Rockwell International Corporation | Self propelled underwater device with steerable fin stabilizer |
US5507672A (en) * | 1993-12-09 | 1996-04-16 | Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha | Trim adjust system for a watercraft |
FR2736888B1 (en) | 1995-07-21 | 1997-09-26 | Havre Chantiers | ANTI-TANGAGE STABILIZATION DEVICE FOR VESSELS |
US5511504A (en) * | 1995-08-09 | 1996-04-30 | Martin; John R. | Computer controlled fins for improving seakeeping in marine vessels |
DE69635463D1 (en) † | 1995-09-22 | 2005-12-22 | Input Output Inc | Device for the local determination of an underwater cable |
NL1025733C1 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2005-09-19 | Quantum Controls B V | Active pendulum damping system for ship movements. |
US7451715B2 (en) * | 2006-05-17 | 2008-11-18 | Quantum Controls B.V. | Active roll stabilisation system for ships |
-
2008
- 2008-10-02 IT IT000725A patent/ITTO20080725A1/en unknown
-
2009
- 2009-09-29 AT AT09171591T patent/ATE552165T1/en active
- 2009-09-29 ES ES09171591.2T patent/ES2384363T5/en active Active
- 2009-09-29 EP EP09171591.2A patent/EP2172394B9/en active Active
- 2009-09-29 PL PL09171591T patent/PL2172394T5/en unknown
- 2009-09-29 DK DK09171591.2T patent/DK2172394T4/en active
- 2009-10-01 US US12/571,842 patent/US20100083887A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2012
- 2012-06-27 HR HRP20120531TT patent/HRP20120531T4/en unknown
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT201800007927A1 (en) * | 2018-08-07 | 2020-02-07 | Verme Projects Srl | STABILIZATION EQUIPMENT FOR BOATS |
DE102020208770A1 (en) | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-20 | Skf Marine Gmbh | contraption |
WO2022013014A1 (en) | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-20 | Skf Marine Gmbh | Device for the roll stabilizing of a watercraft |
IT202000021328A1 (en) | 2020-09-09 | 2022-03-09 | MVM Holding Srl | STABILIZATION EQUIPMENT FOR BOATS |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20100083887A1 (en) | 2010-04-08 |
ES2384363T3 (en) | 2012-07-04 |
ATE552165T1 (en) | 2012-04-15 |
ES2384363T5 (en) | 2017-01-03 |
HRP20120531T1 (en) | 2012-07-31 |
EP2172394B2 (en) | 2016-07-13 |
PL2172394T3 (en) | 2012-08-31 |
EP2172394A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 |
ES2384363T9 (en) | 2017-11-30 |
DK2172394T4 (en) | 2016-11-07 |
ITTO20080725A1 (en) | 2010-04-03 |
PL2172394T5 (en) | 2018-04-30 |
HRP20120531T4 (en) | 2016-12-30 |
EP2172394B1 (en) | 2012-04-04 |
DK2172394T3 (en) | 2012-06-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2172394B9 (en) | Automatic anti-roll stabilization system of a watercraft | |
US10246170B2 (en) | Electric fin stabilizer | |
US7370594B2 (en) | System for reducing the roll of a boat | |
US4261278A (en) | Gyro-controlled pitch stabilizing system | |
US5511504A (en) | Computer controlled fins for improving seakeeping in marine vessels | |
US7429202B2 (en) | Outboard motor control system | |
US7063030B2 (en) | Electric steering apparatus for watercraft | |
DK2876041T3 (en) | Arrangement for determining a force acting on a rudder | |
CA2880376C (en) | Aerofoil sail | |
US20070125287A1 (en) | Boat rudder with integrated dynamic trim foils | |
US5433162A (en) | Apparatus for reducing rocking motion of marine floating structure | |
US20110208377A1 (en) | Efficiency optimizing propeller speed control for ships | |
CN102365443B (en) | Ship engine control system | |
US20190265708A1 (en) | Sailboat steering system and method for steering a sailboat | |
DK2990327T3 (en) | Marine Vessel Power System and Procedure | |
JP2023533523A (en) | Device for roll stabilization of ships | |
Tunçer et al. | Interceptor design and control for the high speed craft | |
JP4410663B2 (en) | Marine emergency propulsion control apparatus and method | |
NL1044582B1 (en) | Propulsion system for a vessel | |
ITTO20110107U1 (en) | ANTI-ROLLIO AUTOMATIC STABILIZATION SYSTEM FOR BOATS | |
KR200475639Y1 (en) | Active rudder | |
MAKRYGIANNIS | PROPULSION SYSTEM CONTROL OF SHIPS SAILING IN WAVES | |
CN118372964A (en) | Drive unit for combined propulsion and motion control of a marine vessel | |
Stefanowski | Reduction of ship steering gear load at high sea states by decreasing rudder angular velocity | |
JP2011011726A (en) | Governor control device and governor control method for marine engine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100827 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100923 |
|
TPAC | Observations filed by third parties |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B63B 39/06 20060101AFI20111123BHEP |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: CAPPIELLO, ALESSANDRO |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
TPAC | Observations filed by third parties |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 552165 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120415 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602009006229 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120531 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: TUEP Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2384363 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20120704 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20120404 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: T1PR Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20120401438 Country of ref document: GR Effective date: 20120713 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20120404 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120804 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120806 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: NAIAD MARITIME GROUP, INC. Effective date: 20130104 Opponent name: QUANTUM CONTROLS B.V./SLEIPNER MOTOR AS/ ABT. TRAC Effective date: 20130103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 602009006229 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130103 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120704 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090929 |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: CMC MARINE S.R.L. |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: QUANTUM CONTROLS B.V./SLEIPNER MOTOR AS/ ABT. TRAC Effective date: 20130103 |
|
APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20160713 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 602009006229 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: AELC |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T4 Effective date: 20161031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: RPEO |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: TB2 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: UEP Ref document number: 552165 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160713 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: T4IZ Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: DC2A Ref document number: 2384363 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T5 Effective date: 20170103 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20160402512 Country of ref document: GR Effective date: 20170130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20190911 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20200915 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20210910 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20220913 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20230912 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240926 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20240926 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20240917 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: HR Payment date: 20240910 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: MC Payment date: 20240918 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20240917 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20240925 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20120531 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20240910 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240924 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20240925 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20240925 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240925 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20240925 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20240917 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20240903 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Payment date: 20240917 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20240925 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20240911 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: MT Payment date: 20240927 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20241017 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20241001 Year of fee payment: 16 |