EP1619152A1 - Method for identifying overlapping mailings - Google Patents
Method for identifying overlapping mailings Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1619152A1 EP1619152A1 EP05300598A EP05300598A EP1619152A1 EP 1619152 A1 EP1619152 A1 EP 1619152A1 EP 05300598 A EP05300598 A EP 05300598A EP 05300598 A EP05300598 A EP 05300598A EP 1619152 A1 EP1619152 A1 EP 1619152A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sorting
- pass
- postal
- postal items
- physical quantity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H7/00—Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles
- B65H7/02—Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors
- B65H7/06—Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed
- B65H7/12—Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed responsive to double feed or separation
- B65H7/125—Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed responsive to double feed or separation sensing the double feed or separation without contacting the articles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2511/00—Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
- B65H2511/10—Size; Dimensions
- B65H2511/11—Length
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2511/00—Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
- B65H2511/10—Size; Dimensions
- B65H2511/13—Thickness
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2511/00—Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
- B65H2511/10—Size; Dimensions
- B65H2511/15—Height, e.g. of stack
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2515/00—Physical entities not provided for in groups B65H2511/00 or B65H2513/00
- B65H2515/10—Mass, e.g. mass flow rate; Weight; Inertia
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2515/00—Physical entities not provided for in groups B65H2511/00 or B65H2513/00
- B65H2515/20—Volume; Volume flow
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S209/00—Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
- Y10S209/90—Sorting flat-type mail
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of processing postal items in a postal sorting machine, wherein the postal items are passed several times in a machine according to a sorting plan for preparing a tour of the factor.
- a known malfunction of a sorting machine is related to the fact that postal items may not be correctly unstacked and are therefore injected "multiple catch" in the conveyor, ie overlapping or overlapping. This type of malfunction can occur during successive sorting passes.
- DE19625043 already discloses a method for identifying the presence of multiple-mailed postal items by the combination of probabilities on measurements of the length, height and thickness of postal items.
- Also known from GB2279634 is another method for detecting multiple taps by means of a belt system driven at different speeds combined with a length measurement of the incoming and outgoing shipments of the belt system.
- the object of the present invention is to propose another method of processing postal items capable of detecting multiple taps occurring between two sorting passes.
- the physical quantity measured during the first and second passes is compared for the mailpiece preceding the current mailpiece in the second sorting pass so as to verify that the expected mailing detected as absent is or is not in progress. multiple catch with the shipment preceding the current shipment.
- the measured physical quantity is the thickness and / or the height and / or the length and / or the volume and / or the weight of the current shipment.
- distribution points are assigned to the postal items and if the presence of at least two postal items is identified, the distribution points of the postal items are compared. in multiple socket for directing them to the same sorting outlet.
- the invention also extends to a postal sorting machine arranged to implement the method defined above.
- Figure 1 is a schematic perspective view of a sorting machine arranged to implement the method according to the invention.
- Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the different steps of the method according to the invention in connection with a particular case of sorting.
- the postal sorting machine 1 shown in FIG. 1 comprises an introductory bench 2 for postal items, a destacker 3, an automatic address reading unit 4 and a conveyor 5 for postal items to sorting outlets 6.
- an operator lays singing postal items on the introductory bench 2 which are separated one by one by the 3, and injected into the automatic address reading unit 4.
- Different members of the automatic address reading unit 4 such as an OCR / VCS address recognition device or a code reader. identification bars, determine in which sorting outlet 6 must be sent each postal item according to the distribution point to which it is assigned and the predetermined sorting plan.
- the postal items contained in the sorting outlets 6 are reintroduced into the sorting machine 1 while keeping a precise order for a second sorting pass at the end of which they are sorted according to the predetermined sorting plan, for example for the postman's tour. .
- the sequence of postal items observed during the first pass is memorized, that is to say that for each current mail item, an identifier of the mail item is matched with its order of passage in first sorting pass or with its unloading order in each sorting outlet in the first sorting pass.
- an identifier of the mail item is matched with its order of passage in first sorting pass or with its unloading order in each sorting outlet in the first sorting pass.
- it also stores its distribution point and a physical quantity specific to the mailpiece capable of distinguishing a multiple plug.
- the identifier of the postal item is for example the identification code known as "Chronomarque" or the digital print of the postal item as described in the patent application FR-2841673.
- the knowledge of the distribution points assigned to the postal items and the sorting plan it is possible to calculate an expected sequence of postal items for the second sorting pass which is the order in which the postal items must appear in the machine for the second sorting pass. Therefore, by simple comparison between the expected sequence and the real sequence obtained in the second pass, it is able to detect if a mailpiece present in the first pass is not in the second pass.
- the non-detection of one or more postal items may be due to a multiple plug or to a non-unloading or manipulation error. In order to improve the efficiency of the sorting machine as much as possible by avoiding unnecessary rejection of postal items, it is interesting to know if this non-detection is linked or not to a multiple plug.
- a comparison is made between the physical quantity of a postal item of the sequence expected for the second sorting pass and the physical quantity of the corresponding mail piece of the actual sequence for the second pass.
- the physical quantity specific to the postal item suitable for distinguishing a multiple plug is, for example, the thickness, the height, the length, the volume, the surface or the weight and is measured by means of appropriate known detectors which are preferably already available.
- methods for detecting multiple taps from the length of postal items are known from FR2842127 and US6737633. Other techniques can still be employed to distinguish multiple taps such as the known contour analysis of FR2841487.
- Figure 2 provides a better understanding of the invention with respect to a particular example.
- a sequence of mailings passes into the automatic address reading unit 4 in front of an identification barcode reader, a thickness sensor and a height and weight sensor.
- width and each mail item is routed to a sorting outlet 6 determined from the predetermined sorting plan and the distribution point obtained from the identification code.
- the thickness, the height and the length of the mailpiece make it possible to determine its volume.
- the sorting machine 1 calculates the sequence of postal items expected. for the second pass, ie the expected identification code sequence, keeping in correspondence the distribution points and the volume.
- Figure 2 shows an expected sequence of four consecutive mail items, designated respectively by A, B, C, D and recognized by their identification codes.
- the references Pd A , Pd B , Pd C , Pd D represent the respective distribution points of the postal items and the references GP A , GP B , GP C , GP D represent the respective physical quantities of the postal items measured during the first pass. and more particularly the volumes.
- FIG. 2 also shows a corresponding real sequence 11 obtained during the second pass which has a difference with respect to the expected sequence 10 with regard to the consecutive postal items which are the postal items A, B and D, with respective volumes GP ' A , GP' B , GP ' D.
- the current mailing of the actual sequence 11 is indeed the expected mailing in the expected sequence 10.
- the first mailing has passed matches well with the first mailing expected.
- the second mailpiece B passed corresponds well with the second mailpiece B expected.
- the third mail piece D that has passed does not correspond with the third mail piece C expected but is a close mail item in the expected sequence 11.
- the comparison between the expected sequence 10 and the actual sequence 11 shows that the mail piece C which should have been between postal items B and D was not detected in step 12.
- Mailing C is not in the actual sequence 11 either because of an error or because it is in multiple engagement with the mailpiece B preceding the current mailing (or with the current mailpiece D according to the configuration of the postal sorting machine with regard to the unstacker 3 and the automatic reading unit of address 4).
- the shipment C is in multiple connection with the shipment B. It is therefore necessary to know if sort out postal item B or reject it.
- a step of the method according to the invention noted under the reference 13 in FIG.
- step 13 it is checked whether the items B and C are in multiple engagement during a step 17 in which the volume GP B of the postal item B measured at during the first sorting pass at the volume GP ' B of the postal item B measured during the second pass. If the difference between the volumes GP B and GP ' B does not exceed a given threshold, it is considered that the transmission B is not in multiple connection with the shipment C and the shipment B is sorted at the step 15, otherwise the sending B is rejected in step 18 and therefore the shipment C. The postal items B and C will then be manually sorted later.
- This method according to the invention reliably allows rejection of multi-taped postal items when this is necessary and avoids as much as possible rejecting the postal items assumed to be multiple-ended while they are not.
- the method according to the invention described with reference to FIG. 2 in the case where a single postal item has not been detected can obviously apply when two or more postal items have not been detected.
- the unit between all the distribution points of the mail items supposed to be multiple-taped is considered during step 13 and the threshold for the comparison of the volumes is adapted during step 17.
- Steps 13 and 17 can be reversed or independent.
- the method described above for a treatment of postal items in two sorting passes can of course be applied for a postal item processing in addition to two sorting passes.
- the knowledge of the expected sequence for the second sorting pass and the thickness (physical quantity) of the postal items measured during the first sorting pass can also serve to size the logistical requirements, in particular number of bins needed, number of rounds simultaneous packaging of objects by distribution point or group of distribution points, etc., for the downstream sorting and distribution process.
Landscapes
- Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
- Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
- Communication Control (AREA)
Abstract
Description
La présente invention concerne un procédé de traitement d'envois postaux dans une machine de tri postal, dans lequel les envois postaux sont passés plusieurs fois en machine selon un plan de tri pour préparer une tournée du facteur.The present invention relates to a method of processing postal items in a postal sorting machine, wherein the postal items are passed several times in a machine according to a sorting plan for preparing a tour of the factor.
L'introduction des envois postaux dans une machine de tri postal s'effectue au moyen d'un dépileur qui sépare un à un les envois postaux en pile pour les injecter dans un convoyeur desservant les sorties de tri de la machine. Le dépilage est une étape très importante et délicate du traitement des envois postaux. Un disfonctionnement connu d'une machine de tri est lié au fait que des envois postaux peuvent ne pas être dépilés correctement et sont donc injectés en "prise multiple" dans le convoyeur, c'est à dire en se superposant ou en se chevauchant. Ce type de disfonctionnement peut survenir au cours des passes successives de tri.The introduction of postal items in a postal sorting machine is carried out by means of a destacker which separates one by one the postal items in stack for injecting them into a conveyor serving the sorting outlets of the machine. Unstacking is a very important and delicate step in the processing of postal items. A known malfunction of a sorting machine is related to the fact that postal items may not be correctly unstacked and are therefore injected "multiple catch" in the conveyor, ie overlapping or overlapping. This type of malfunction can occur during successive sorting passes.
On connaît déjà du document de brevet DE19625043 un procédé pour identifier la présence d'envois postaux en prise multiple par la combinaison de probabilités sur des mesures de longueur, de hauteur et d'épaisseur d'envois postaux.DE19625043 already discloses a method for identifying the presence of multiple-mailed postal items by the combination of probabilities on measurements of the length, height and thickness of postal items.
On connaît aussi du document de brevet GB2279634 un autre procédé pour détecter les prises multiples au moyen d'un système de courroies entraînées à des vitesses différentes combiné à une mesure de longueur des envois en entrée et en sorties du système de courroies.Also known from GB2279634 is another method for detecting multiple taps by means of a belt system driven at different speeds combined with a length measurement of the incoming and outgoing shipments of the belt system.
D'autres procédés pour identifier la présence d'envois postaux en prise multiple sont encore décrits dans les documents de brevets US3955812, US4121716 et FR2841487.Other methods for identifying the presence of multiple taped mail items are further described in US3955812, US4121716 and FR2841487.
La présente invention a pour but de proposer un autre procédé de traitement d'envois postaux apte à détecter des prises multiples survenant entre deux passes de tri.The object of the present invention is to propose another method of processing postal items capable of detecting multiple taps occurring between two sorting passes.
A cet effet, l'invention a pour objet un procédé de traitement d'envois postaux dans une machine de tri postal, dans lequel les envois postaux sont passés une première fois puis une seconde fois en machine selon un plan de tri, caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend les étapes suivantes :
- lors de la première passe de tri, on mesure pour chaque envoi courant une grandeur physique propre à l'envoi et à l'issue de la première passe de tri, on détermine, sur la base du passage des envois postaux en première passe de tri et du plan de tri, une séquence attendue des envois postaux pour la seconde passe de tri qui est l'ordre dans lequel les envois postaux doivent se présenter dans la machine pour la seconde passe de tri;
- lors de la seconde passe de tri, on mesure de nouveau pour chaque envoi courant la même grandeur physique et si on détermine que cet envoi courant n'est pas l'envoi attendu dans ladite séquence, on compare les grandeurs physiques mesurées pour un même envoi postal respectivement lors de la première passe et de la seconde passe pour identifier la présence d'envois postaux en prise multiple.
- during the first sorting pass, a physical quantity specific to the sending and at the end of the first sorting pass is measured for each current item, it is determined, on the basis of the passage of the mail items in the first sorting pass, and the sorting plan, an expected sequence of postal items for the second sorting pass which is the order in which the postal items must appear in the machine for the second sorting pass;
- during the second sorting pass, the same physical quantity is measured again for each current item and if it is determined that this current item is not the expected item in said sequence, the physical quantities measured for the same item are compared. at the first pass and the second pass to identify the presence of multiple-catch postal items.
Préférablement, on compare la grandeur physique mesurée lors de la première et de la seconde passe pour l'envoi postal précédant l'envoi postal courant dans la seconde passe de tri de façon à vérifier que l'envoi attendu détecté comme absent est ou non en prise multiple avec l'envoi précédant l'envoi courant.Preferably, the physical quantity measured during the first and second passes is compared for the mailpiece preceding the current mailpiece in the second sorting pass so as to verify that the expected mailing detected as absent is or is not in progress. multiple catch with the shipment preceding the current shipment.
Selon différents modes de mise en oeuvre particuliers du procédé selon l'invention, la grandeur physique mesurée est l'épaisseur et/ou la hauteur et/ou la longueur et/ou le volume et/ou le poids de l'envoi courant.According to various particular embodiments of the method according to the invention, the measured physical quantity is the thickness and / or the height and / or the length and / or the volume and / or the weight of the current shipment.
Selon un autre mode de mise en oeuvre du procédé selon l'invention, des points de distribution sont affectés aux envois postaux et si on identifie la présence d'au moins deux envois postaux en prise multiple, on compare les points de distribution des envois postaux en prise multiple en vue de les diriger vers une même sortie de tri.According to another embodiment of the method according to the invention, distribution points are assigned to the postal items and if the presence of at least two postal items is identified, the distribution points of the postal items are compared. in multiple socket for directing them to the same sorting outlet.
L'invention s'étend également à une machine de tri postal agencée pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé défini ci-dessus.The invention also extends to a postal sorting machine arranged to implement the method defined above.
L'invention sera mieux comprise à la lecture de la description qui suit et à l'examen des figures qui l'accompagnent. Cette description n'est donnée qu'à titre d'exemple indicatif et nullement limitatif de l'invention.The invention will be better understood on reading the description which follows and the examination of the figures which accompany it. This description is given as an indicative and non-limiting example of the invention.
La figure 1 est une vue en perspective schématique d'une machine de tri agencée pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé selon l'invention.Figure 1 is a schematic perspective view of a sorting machine arranged to implement the method according to the invention.
La figure 2 est un synoptique montrant les différentes étapes du procédé selon l'invention en rapport avec un cas particulier de tri.Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the different steps of the method according to the invention in connection with a particular case of sorting.
La machine de tri postal 1 représentée sur la figure 1 comporte un banc d'introduction 2 des envois postaux, un dépileur 3, une unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4 et un convoyeur 5 des envois postaux vers des sorties de tri 6.The
Lors d'une première passe de tri, un opérateur dépose sur chant des envois postaux sur le banc d'introduction 2 qui sont séparés un à un par le dépileur 3 et injectés dans l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4. Différents organes de l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4, tels qu'un dispositif de reconnaissance d'adresse par OCR/VCS ou un lecteur de code à barres d'identification, déterminent dans quelle sortie de tri 6 doit être envoyé chaque envoi postal en fonction du point de distribution auquel il est affecté et du plan de tri prédéterminé. Les envois postaux contenus dans les sorties de tri 6 sont réintroduits dans la machine de tri 1 en conservant un ordre précis pour une seconde passe de tri à la fin de laquelle ils sont triés selon le plan de tri prédéterminé par exemple pour la tournée du facteur.During a first sorting pass, an operator lays singing postal items on the
Dans le procédé selon l'invention, on mémorise la séquence des envois postaux observée lors de la première passe, c'est à dire que pour chaque envoi postal courant on met en correspondance un identifiant de l'envoi postal avec son ordre de passage en première passe de tri ou avec son ordre de déchargement dans chaque sortie de tri en première passe de tri. On mémorise également pour chaque envoi postal courant son point de distribution et une grandeur physique propre à l'envoi postal propre à distinguer une prise multiple. L'identifiant de l'envoi postal est par exemple le code d'identification plus connu sous le nom de "chronomarque" ou encore l'empreinte numérique de l'envoi postal telle que décrite dans la demande de brevet FR-2841673. A partir de la séquence des envois postaux observée lors de la première passe, de la connaissance des points de distribution affectés aux envois postaux et du plan de tri, on peut calculer une séquence attendue des envois postaux pour la seconde passe de tri qui est l'ordre dans lequel les envois postaux doivent se présenter dans la machine pour la seconde passe de tri. Par conséquent, par simple comparaison entre la séquence attendue et la séquence réelle obtenue en deuxième passe, on est capable de détecter si un envoi postal présent lors de la première passe ne l'est plus lors de la seconde passe. La non-détection d'un ou plusieurs envois postaux peut être due soit à une prise multiple, soit à une erreur de non-déchargement ou de manipulation. Afin d'améliorer au maximum l'efficacité de la machine de tri en évitant de rejeter inutilement des envois postaux, il est intéressant de savoir si cette non-détection est liée ou non à une prise multiple. A cet effet, on effectue une comparaison entre la grandeur physique d'un envoi postal de la séquence attendue pour la deuxième passe de tri et la grandeur physique de l'envoi postal correspondant de la séquence réelle pour la seconde passe. La grandeur physique propre à l'envoi postal propre à distinguer une prise multiple est par exemple l'épaisseur, la hauteur, la longueur, le volume, la surface ou encore le poids et est mesurée au moyen de détecteurs appropriés connus qui sont préférablement déjà disponibles dans la machine de tri 1. Par exemple, des méthodes pour détecter des prises multiples à partir de la longueur des envois postaux sont connues des documents de brevet FR2842127 et US6737633. D'autres techniques peuvent encore être employées pour distinguer des prises multiples telle que l'analyse de contour connue du document de brevet FR2841487.In the method according to the invention, the sequence of postal items observed during the first pass is memorized, that is to say that for each current mail item, an identifier of the mail item is matched with its order of passage in first sorting pass or with its unloading order in each sorting outlet in the first sorting pass. For each current mailpiece, it also stores its distribution point and a physical quantity specific to the mailpiece capable of distinguishing a multiple plug. The identifier of the postal item is for example the identification code known as "Chronomarque" or the digital print of the postal item as described in the patent application FR-2841673. From the sequence of mailings observed during the first pass, the knowledge of the distribution points assigned to the postal items and the sorting plan, it is possible to calculate an expected sequence of postal items for the second sorting pass which is the order in which the postal items must appear in the machine for the second sorting pass. Therefore, by simple comparison between the expected sequence and the real sequence obtained in the second pass, it is able to detect if a mailpiece present in the first pass is not in the second pass. The non-detection of one or more postal items may be due to a multiple plug or to a non-unloading or manipulation error. In order to improve the efficiency of the sorting machine as much as possible by avoiding unnecessary rejection of postal items, it is interesting to know if this non-detection is linked or not to a multiple plug. For this purpose, a comparison is made between the physical quantity of a postal item of the sequence expected for the second sorting pass and the physical quantity of the corresponding mail piece of the actual sequence for the second pass. The The physical quantity specific to the postal item suitable for distinguishing a multiple plug is, for example, the thickness, the height, the length, the volume, the surface or the weight and is measured by means of appropriate known detectors which are preferably already available. In the
La figure 2 permet de mieux comprendre l'invention au regard d'un exemple particulier. Lors d'une première passe de tri, une séquence d'envois postaux passe dans l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4 devant un lecteur de code à barres d'identification, un capteur d'épaisseur et un capteur de hauteur et de largeur et chaque envoi postal est acheminé vers une sortie de tri 6 déterminée à partir du plan de tri prédéterminé et du point de distribution obtenu à partir du code d'identification. L'épaisseur, la hauteur et la longueur de l'envoi postal permettent de déterminer son volume. Sur la base de l'ordre de passage des envois postaux à l'issue de la première passe de tri, des points de distribution affectés aux envois postaux et du plan de tri, la machine de tri 1 calcule la séquence d'envois postaux attendue pour la seconde passe, c'est à dire la séquence de code d'identification attendue, en gardant en correspondance les points de distribution et le volume.Figure 2 provides a better understanding of the invention with respect to a particular example. During a first sorting pass, a sequence of mailings passes into the automatic address reading unit 4 in front of an identification barcode reader, a thickness sensor and a height and weight sensor. width and each mail item is routed to a
La figure 2 montre une séquence attendue 10 de quatre envois postaux consécutifs, désignés respectivement par A, B, C, D et reconnus par leurs codes d'identification. Les références PdA, PdB, PdC, PdD représentent les points de distribution respectifs des envois postaux et les références GPA, GPB, GPC, GPD représentent les grandeurs physiques respectives des envois postaux mesurées lors de la première passe et plus particulièrement les volumes. La figure 2 montre également une séquence réelle 11 correspondante obtenue lors de la deuxième passe qui présente une différence par rapport à la séquence attendue 10 en ce qui concerne les envois postaux consécutifs qui sont les envois postaux A, B et D, avec comme volumes respectifs GP'A, GP'B, GP'D.Figure 2 shows an expected sequence of four consecutive mail items, designated respectively by A, B, C, D and recognized by their identification codes. The references Pd A , Pd B , Pd C , Pd D represent the respective distribution points of the postal items and the references GP A , GP B , GP C , GP D represent the respective physical quantities of the postal items measured during the first pass. and more particularly the volumes. FIG. 2 also shows a corresponding
Successivement, on détermine si l'envoi postal courant de la séquence réelle 11 est bien l'envoi postal attendu dans la séquence attendue 10. Dans l'exemple de la figure 2, le premier envoi postal A passé correspond bien avec le premier envoi postal A attendu. Aussi, le second envoi postal B passé correspond bien avec le second envoi postal B attendu. Par contre, le troisième envoi postal D passé ne correspond pas avec le troisième envoi postal C attendu mais est un envoi postal proche dans la séquence attendue 11. La comparaison entre la séquence attendue 10 et la séquence réelle 11 montre que l'envoi postal C qui aurait du se trouver entre les envois postaux B et D n'a pas été détecté à l'étape 12. L'envoi postal C n'est pas dans la séquence réelle 11 soit du fait d'une erreur, soit du fait qu'il est en prise multiple avec l'envoi postal B précédant l'envoi courant (ou avec l'envoi postal courant D selon la configuration de la machine de tri postal en ce qui concerne le dépileur 3 et l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4). Afin d'éviter de trier l'envoi C de manière incorrecte, ce qui aurait des conséquences graves pour le distributeur postal, on considère que l'envoi C est en prise multiple avec l'envoi B. Il convient donc de savoir s'il faut trier l'envoi postal B ou le rejeter. Pour cela, une étape du procédé selon l'invention notée sous la référence 13 dans la figure 2 permet de déterminer à partir des informations mémorisées en correspondance avec la séquence attendue 10 si les envois postaux B et C doivent être envoyés dans la même sortie de tri 6 ou plus particulièrement si le point de distribution PdB de l'envoi B est le même que le point de distribution PdC de l'envoi C. En seconde passe de tri, des envois postaux ayant un même point de distribution ont une bonne probabilité d'être consécutifs dans la séquence. Dans le cas où les points de distribution PdB et PdC sont identiques comme à la sortie 14 de l'étape 13, on trie l'envoi B à l'étape 15 et par conséquent en cas de prise multiple on trie l'envoi C de manière correcte. Dans le cas contraire, à la sortie 16 de l'étape 13, on vérifie si les envois B et C sont en prise multiple au cours d'une étape 17 dans laquelle on compare le volume GPB de l'envoi postal B mesuré au cours de la première passe de tri au volume GP'B de l'envoi postal B mesuré au cours de la seconde passe. Si l'écart entre les volumes GPB et GP'B n'excède pas un seuil donné on considère que l'envoi B n'est pas en prise multiple avec l'envoi C et on trie l'envoi B à l'étape 15, sinon on rejète l'envoi B à l'étape 18 et par conséquent l'envoi C. Les envois postaux B et C seront alors triés manuellement ultérieurement.Successively, it is determined whether the current mailing of the
Ce procédé selon l'invention permet de manière fiable de rejeter les envois postaux en prise multiple lorsque cela est nécessaire et d'éviter au maximum de rejeter les envois postaux supposés en prise multiple alors qu'ils ne le sont pas.This method according to the invention reliably allows rejection of multi-taped postal items when this is necessary and avoids as much as possible rejecting the postal items assumed to be multiple-ended while they are not.
Le procédé selon l'invention décrit en référence à la figure 2 dans le cas ou un unique envoi postal n'a pas été détecté peut s'appliquer bien évidemment lorsque deux envois postaux ou plus n'ont pas été détectés. Pour cela, l'unité entre tous les points de distribution des envois postaux supposés en prise multiple est considérée lors de l'étape 13 et le seuil pour la comparaison des volumes est adapté lors de l'étape 17.The method according to the invention described with reference to FIG. 2 in the case where a single postal item has not been detected can obviously apply when two or more postal items have not been detected. For this, the unit between all the distribution points of the mail items supposed to be multiple-taped is considered during
Les étapes 13 et 17 peuvent être inversées ou indépendantes.
Le procédé décrit ci-dessus pour un traitement d'envois postaux en deux passes de tri peut bien entendu être appliqué pour un traitement d'envois postaux en plus de deux passes de tri.The method described above for a treatment of postal items in two sorting passes can of course be applied for a postal item processing in addition to two sorting passes.
La connaissance de la séquence attendue pour la seconde passe de tri et de l'épaisseur (grandeur physique) des envois postaux mesurée lors de la première passe de tri peut également servir à dimensionner les besoins logistiques, notamment nombre de bacs nécessaires, nombre de tournées simultanées, conditionnement des objets par point de distribution ou groupe de points de distribution, etc..., pour le processus de tri et de distribution en aval.The knowledge of the expected sequence for the second sorting pass and the thickness (physical quantity) of the postal items measured during the first sorting pass can also serve to size the logistical requirements, in particular number of bins needed, number of rounds simultaneous packaging of objects by distribution point or group of distribution points, etc., for the downstream sorting and distribution process.
Claims (9)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0451628A FR2873361B1 (en) | 2004-07-22 | 2004-07-22 | METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING MULTIPLE INPUT SENDS |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1619152A1 true EP1619152A1 (en) | 2006-01-25 |
EP1619152B1 EP1619152B1 (en) | 2007-11-14 |
Family
ID=34948636
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05300598A Not-in-force EP1619152B1 (en) | 2004-07-22 | 2005-07-18 | Method for identifying overlapping mailings |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7482549B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1619152B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE378277T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602005003270T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2294662T3 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2873361B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SE529659C2 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2007-10-16 | Straalfors Ab | Procedure and apparatus for shipping control |
DE102008003778A1 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2009-03-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for transporting and processing a plurality of objects |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3955812A (en) * | 1972-02-17 | 1976-05-11 | Nippon Electric Company Limited | Flat-article separating apparatus for an automatic mail handling system and the like |
US4121716A (en) * | 1977-12-12 | 1978-10-24 | Pitney-Bowes, Inc. | Doubles and thickness detector and sorter |
GB2279634A (en) * | 1993-06-25 | 1995-01-11 | Toshiba Kk | Apparatus for transporting card-like articles |
DE19625043C1 (en) * | 1996-06-22 | 1997-04-10 | Aeg Electrocom Gmbh | Method of separating items for mailing distribution |
FR2841487A1 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2004-01-02 | Solystic | METHOD FOR DETECTING SINGLE PLIERS AND MULTIPLE PLUG PLUGS IN A POSTAL SORTING FACILITY |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07185472A (en) * | 1993-12-28 | 1995-07-25 | Hitachi Ltd | Paper sorting device |
-
2004
- 2004-07-22 FR FR0451628A patent/FR2873361B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-07-18 AT AT05300598T patent/ATE378277T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-07-18 DE DE602005003270T patent/DE602005003270T2/en active Active
- 2005-07-18 ES ES05300598T patent/ES2294662T3/en active Active
- 2005-07-18 EP EP05300598A patent/EP1619152B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-07-20 US US11/184,893 patent/US7482549B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3955812A (en) * | 1972-02-17 | 1976-05-11 | Nippon Electric Company Limited | Flat-article separating apparatus for an automatic mail handling system and the like |
US4121716A (en) * | 1977-12-12 | 1978-10-24 | Pitney-Bowes, Inc. | Doubles and thickness detector and sorter |
GB2279634A (en) * | 1993-06-25 | 1995-01-11 | Toshiba Kk | Apparatus for transporting card-like articles |
DE19625043C1 (en) * | 1996-06-22 | 1997-04-10 | Aeg Electrocom Gmbh | Method of separating items for mailing distribution |
FR2841487A1 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2004-01-02 | Solystic | METHOD FOR DETECTING SINGLE PLIERS AND MULTIPLE PLUG PLUGS IN A POSTAL SORTING FACILITY |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7482549B2 (en) | 2009-01-27 |
ATE378277T1 (en) | 2007-11-15 |
DE602005003270D1 (en) | 2007-12-27 |
EP1619152B1 (en) | 2007-11-14 |
US20060016730A1 (en) | 2006-01-26 |
FR2873361A1 (en) | 2006-01-27 |
ES2294662T3 (en) | 2008-04-01 |
DE602005003270T2 (en) | 2008-09-18 |
FR2873361B1 (en) | 2006-09-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
FR2866252A1 (en) | Postal item e.g. letter, sorting process for postal item sorting machine, involves recording digital impressions of objects with respect to identification numbers of trays during one sorting pass | |
FR2883493A1 (en) | METHOD FOR PROCESSING SHIPMENTS INCLUDING DIGITAL IMPRINT MANAGEMENT OF SHIPMENTS | |
EP2605867A1 (en) | Postal sorting machine including gripping conveying means, and method for implementing same | |
EP1770037A1 (en) | Process of detecting double feeding of postal items by image analysis of the upright items | |
FR2690248A1 (en) | Device for opening envelopes in large numbers for the extraction of their contents and method for its implementation. | |
EP1519795B1 (en) | Method for detecting single postal covers and postal covers stuck together in a mail sorting machine | |
EP1619152B1 (en) | Method for identifying overlapping mailings | |
EP1736250B1 (en) | Process of merging letters and large or non-machine-treatable postal items into a single postman's walk | |
EP2454178A1 (en) | Device for unstacking flat objects that detects the path of unstacked objects | |
EP2822709B1 (en) | Method of tracking postal items to measure the travel time in a postal sorting network | |
EP1704931B2 (en) | Process of treating mail items including sequence check | |
EP1526924B1 (en) | Method for detecting multiple overlapping covers in a mail sorting installation | |
EP1707275B1 (en) | Method of treating postal items with dynamic overflow | |
EP1618969B1 (en) | Method for handling postal items for preparation and separation of postman's routes and according sorting apparatus | |
EP2185296B1 (en) | Item conveying device with refuse rate control | |
CA3029955C (en) | Device for measuring the stiffness of postal articles | |
EP2133845A1 (en) | Franking system enabling the handling of postage items with different destinations | |
EP2424802B1 (en) | Method for detecting opened postal items such as envelope-free magazines | |
EP3310502B1 (en) | Method and device for manually combining mail objects into a pile of already sorted mail items | |
JPH09220536A (en) | Paper sheet processing apparatus and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060725 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20071129 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602005003270 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20071227 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2294662 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080214 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080314 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: SIEMENS AG CT IP MO Effective date: 20080814 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080414 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: SIEMENS AG CT IP MO |
|
PLBP | Opposition withdrawn |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
PLBD | Termination of opposition procedure: decision despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPC1 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
PLBM | Termination of opposition procedure: date of legal effect published |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009276 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION PROCEDURE CLOSED |
|
27C | Opposition proceedings terminated |
Effective date: 20090524 |
|
NLR2 | Nl: decision of opposition |
Effective date: 20090524 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090731 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080718 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080515 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071114 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20150721 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20150728 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20150721 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20150713 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20150721 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20150721 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20150721 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20150729 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20150727 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602005003270 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20160801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160719 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170201 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160801 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160801 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160718 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160719 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20181130 |