EP1512628B1 - Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft - Google Patents
Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1512628B1 EP1512628B1 EP04291980A EP04291980A EP1512628B1 EP 1512628 B1 EP1512628 B1 EP 1512628B1 EP 04291980 A EP04291980 A EP 04291980A EP 04291980 A EP04291980 A EP 04291980A EP 1512628 B1 EP1512628 B1 EP 1512628B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- radionavigation
- aircraft
- installation
- events
- recording
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims 19
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004064 dysfunction Effects 0.000 abstract 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229920000297 Rayon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241001080024 Telles Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002964 rayon Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/006—Indicating maintenance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/08—Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
- G07C5/0841—Registering performance data
- G07C5/085—Registering performance data using electronic data carriers
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a device for maintaining a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft.
- aircraft radionavigation equipment such as a Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), a VHF (Very High Frequency) omnidirectional type GPS ("Global Positioning System”) or landing aid device type GLS ("GPS Landing System”), for example, receives data that is external to the aircraft and develops information, including information relating to the position of the aircraft, from said external data. It generally provides this information to other systems of the aircraft, including systems for guiding or displaying the position of the aircraft.
- DME Distance Measuring Equipment
- VHF Very High Frequency
- GLS landing aid device type
- the maintenance procedures provide that the said radionavigation equipment must be deposited and sent to a repairer to be checked and repaired if necessary.
- the information provided by the radionavigation equipment may be erroneous, not only because of a failure of said radionavigation equipment, but also because of a problem relating to said external data received by said radionavigation equipment.
- the usual maintenance procedures are unnecessarily long and costly, since the radionavigation equipment is deposited and sent for repair, while it is not failure, since said malfunction occurred on board the aircraft is due to said data outside the aircraft.
- the present invention aims to overcome these disadvantages. It relates to a method of maintenance of a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, making it possible to reduce the number of cases, for which said radionavigation equipment must be deposited for verification and possible repair when this equipment is suspected of being at the expense of cause of a malfunction on board the aircraft.
- said radionavigation equipment is deposited to send it for repair, only if said first recorded events can not prove that said malfunction is due to a problem relating to data outside the aircraft received by said radionavigation equipment, which of course allows to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary deposits, and therefore reduce the cost and maintenance time.
- it implements said steps a) and b) during the flight of the aircraft, and said step c) at the end of said flight, after the return to the ground of the aircraft.
- these first events are advantageously recorded on a recording medium of said radionavigation equipment, and said second events are recorded on a recording medium of a system of the aircraft, which receives information from said equipment. radionavigation.
- said radionavigation equipment is a landing aid device of the aircraft combined with a satellite positioning system, and said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device does not provide an indication of correct position of the aircraft.
- the present invention also relates to an aircraft maintenance device.
- Figure 1 schematically illustrates a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, which is applied a maintenance device according to the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a maintenance device according to the invention.
- the device 1 according to the invention is intended for the maintenance of a radionavigation equipment 2 of an aircraft A, in particular a civil transport aircraft.
- Said radionavigation equipment 2 may, in particular, be a Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), a VHF omnidirectional beacon ("Very High Frequency"), a GPS positioning system ("Global Positioning”). System ”) or a landing aid of the GLS (“ GPS Landing System ”) type.
- DME Distance Measuring Equipment
- VHF omnidirectional beacon Very High Frequency
- GPS positioning system Global Positioning
- System GPS positioning system
- GPS Landing System GPS Landing System
- said radio navigation equipment 2 of the usual type, which is arranged on board the aircraft A, is capable of receiving data from outside the aircraft A, in particular in the form of electromagnetic waves OE, using for example an antenna 3. It develops from these external data information, for example information or position indications, which it transmits, via links 4 , to user systems 5 of the aircraft A, including guidance systems or display systems.
- said radionavigation equipment 2 is a landing aid device for the GLS aircraft A, which is combined with a positioning system 6.
- This positioning system 6 comprises a set of satellites S1, S2 and / or ground stations P1, P2 which are provided on earth T. These satellites S1, S2 and these ground stations P1, P2 can communicate with each other, and with said equipment of radionavigation 2, using electromagnetic waves OE.
- the maintenance device 1 is associated with said radionavigation equipment 2, as represented generally by a link 1A in phantom in FIG. 1, and as specified below, and is intended to make it possible to reduce the number of cases. , for which said radionavigation equipment 2 must be deposited for verification and possible repair when this equipment 2 is suspected of causing a malfunction on board the aircraft A.
- Said central unit 13 comprises a means 16 and a display screen 17 which is connected by a link 18 to said means 16.
- said means 16 is an information acquisition unit, which receives said first and second lists and displays them on the display screen 17.
- the previous analysis or verification is implemented by a maintenance operator, on reading said two lists which are presented to him on the display screen 17.
- said means 16 is an information processing unit, which automatically implements the preceding analysis or verification, from said two lists received, and which presents the result of this analysis (removal or not).
- radio navigation equipment 2 to a maintenance operator by displaying it on the display screen 17.
- the aforementioned recording of the first and second events is performed during the flight of the aircraft A, and the analysis or verification of said recordings is performed later, after the return of the aircraft A.
- said maintenance device 1 has the advantage of avoiding depositing (and sending for repair) a radio navigation equipment 2, when this equipment 2 could not provide valid information to other systems 5 of the aircraft A, while the origin of the fact that he could not provide this information was not attributable to him, but was attributable to causes outside the aircraft A.
- This device maintenance 1 is therefore very advantageous in terms of duration and cost of maintenance.
- the radio navigation equipment 2 implements a complex function, since it uses external data from a space segment (signals RF radiofrequency transmitted by GPS satellites, for example satellites S1 and S2) and a ground segment (VHF data link transmitted by differential GPS ground stations, for example ground stations P1 and P2).
- a space segment signals RF radiofrequency transmitted by GPS satellites, for example satellites S1 and S2
- a ground segment VHF data link transmitted by differential GPS ground stations, for example ground stations P1 and P2
- the RF signals and the VHF data are grouped in FIG. 1 under the reference OE generally denoting electromagnetic waves.
- said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device 2 do not make it possible to provide an indication of the correct position of the aircraft A.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
Abstract
Description
La présente invention concerne un procédé et un dispositif de maintenance d'un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, en particulier d'un avion de transport.The present invention relates to a method and a device for maintaining a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft.
On sait qu'un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, tel qu'un appareil de mesure de distance de type DME ("Distance Measuring Equipment"), un radiophare omnidirectionnel VHF ("Very High Frequency"), un système de localisation de type GPS ("Global Positioning System") ou un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de type GLS ("GPS Landing System") par exemple, reçoit des données qui sont extérieures à l'aéronef et élabore des informations, notamment des informations relatives à la position de l'aéronef, à partir desdites données extérieures. Il fournit généralement ces informations à d'autres systèmes de l'aéronef, notamment des systèmes de guidage ou d'affichage de la position de l'aéronef. Lorsqu'un dysfonctionnement survient à bord de l'aéronef, dont l'origine est identifiée comme provenant desdites informations qui sont fournies par ledit équipement de radionavigation à d'autres systèmes de l'aéronef, les procédures de maintenance prévoient que ledit équipement de radionavigation doit être déposé et envoyé chez un réparateur pour y être contrôlé et réparé si nécessaire.It is known that aircraft radionavigation equipment, such as a Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), a VHF (Very High Frequency) omnidirectional type GPS ("Global Positioning System") or landing aid device type GLS ("GPS Landing System"), for example, receives data that is external to the aircraft and develops information, including information relating to the position of the aircraft, from said external data. It generally provides this information to other systems of the aircraft, including systems for guiding or displaying the position of the aircraft. When a malfunction occurs on board the aircraft, the origin of which is identified as originating from the said information supplied by the said radionavigation equipment to other systems of the aircraft, the maintenance procedures provide that the said radionavigation equipment must be deposited and sent to a repairer to be checked and repaired if necessary.
Or, les informations fournies par l'équipement de radionavigation peuvent être erronées, non seulement en raison d'une défaillance dudit équipement de radionavigation, mais également en raison d'un problème relatif auxdites données extérieures reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation. Dans ce dernier cas, les procédures de maintenance usuelles s'avèrent inutilement longues et coûteuses, puisque l'équipement de radionavigation est déposé et envoyé en réparation, alors qu'il n'est pas en panne, puisque ledit dysfonctionnement survenu à bord de l'aéronef est dû auxdites données extérieures à l'aéronef.However, the information provided by the radionavigation equipment may be erroneous, not only because of a failure of said radionavigation equipment, but also because of a problem relating to said external data received by said radionavigation equipment. In the latter case, the usual maintenance procedures are unnecessarily long and costly, since the radionavigation equipment is deposited and sent for repair, while it is not failure, since said malfunction occurred on board the aircraft is due to said data outside the aircraft.
La présente invention a pour objet de remédier à ces inconvénients. Elle concerne un procédé de maintenance d'un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, permettant de réduire le nombre de cas, pour lesquels ledit équipement de radionavigation doit être déposé pour vérification et réparation éventuelle lorsque cet équipement est suspecté d'être à l'origine d'un dysfonctionnement intervenu à bord de l'aéronef.The present invention aims to overcome these disadvantages. It relates to a method of maintenance of a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, making it possible to reduce the number of cases, for which said radionavigation equipment must be deposited for verification and possible repair when this equipment is suspected of being at the expense of cause of a malfunction on board the aircraft.
Le Document US 6 115 656 décrit un dispositif selon le préambule de la revendication 6.Document US 6,115,656 describes a device according to the preamble of
A cet effet, ledit procédé est remarquable, selon l'invention, en ce que :
- a) on enregistre dans une première liste, le cas échéant, des premiers évènements relatifs à des données extérieures à l'aéronef, reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation ;
- b) on enregistre dans une seconde liste, le cas échéant, des seconds évènements relatifs à des dysfonctionnements intervenant à bord de l'aéronef ;
- c) on vérifie si ladite seconde liste comporte au moins un second événement relatif à un dysfonctionnement, et :
- c1) si ladite seconde liste ne comporte aucun second évènement, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation ; et
- c2) si ladite seconde liste comporte au moins un second évènement relatif à un dysfonctionnement, on analyse tous les seconds évènements de ladite seconde liste, et :
- α) si aucun desdits seconds évènements n'est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation ; et
- β) si au moins l'un desdits seconds évènements est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation, on analyse tous les premiers évènements de ladite première liste, et :
- β1) si lesdits premiers évènements permettent de prouver que les différents dysfonctionnements sont dus à des problèmes relatifs auxdites données extérieures à l'aéronef, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation ;
- β2) sinon, on dépose ledit équipement de radionavigation.
- a) where appropriate, first events relating to data external to the aircraft received by said radionavigation equipment are recorded in a first list;
- b) recording in a second list, if necessary, second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft;
- c) checking whether said second list includes at least one second event relating to a malfunction, and
- c1) if said second list does not include any second event, said radionavigation equipment is not deposited; and
- c2) if said second list includes at least one second event relating to a malfunction, analyzing all the second events of said second list, and:
- α) if none of said second events is relative to said radionavigation equipment, said radionavigation equipment is not deposited; and
- β) if at least one of said second events is relative to said radionavigation equipment, all the first events of said first list are analyzed, and:
- β1) if said first events make it possible to prove that the various malfunctions are due to problems relating to said data external to the aircraft, said radionavigation equipment is not deposited;
- β2) otherwise, said radionavigation equipment is deposited.
Ainsi, grâce à l'invention, on dépose ledit équipement de radionavigation pour l'envoyer en réparation, uniquement si lesdits premiers évènements enregistrés ne permettent pas de prouver que ledit dysfonctionnement est dû à un problème relatif aux données extérieures à l'aéronef reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation, ce qui permet bien entendu de réduire considérablement le nombre de déposes inutiles, et donc, de diminuer le coût et la durée de maintenance.Thus, thanks to the invention, said radionavigation equipment is deposited to send it for repair, only if said first recorded events can not prove that said malfunction is due to a problem relating to data outside the aircraft received by said radionavigation equipment, which of course allows to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary deposits, and therefore reduce the cost and maintenance time.
De préférence, on met en oeuvre lesdites étapes a) et b) pendant le vol de l'aéronef, et ladite étape c) à la fin dudit vol, après le retour au sol de l'aéronef.Preferably, it implements said steps a) and b) during the flight of the aircraft, and said step c) at the end of said flight, after the return to the ground of the aircraft.
En outre, de façon avantageuse, on enregistre lesdits premiers évènements sur un support d'enregistrement dudit équipement de radionavigation, et on enregistre lesdits seconds évènements sur un support d'enregistrement d'un système de l'aéronef, qui reçoit des informations dudit équipement de radionavigation.In addition, these first events are advantageously recorded on a recording medium of said radionavigation equipment, and said second events are recorded on a recording medium of a system of the aircraft, which receives information from said equipment. radionavigation.
Dans un mode de réalisation particulier, ledit équipement de radionavigation est un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de l'aéronef combiné à un système de positionnement par satellites, et lesdits premiers évènements enregistrés représentent les situations, pour lesquelles les données extérieures reçues par ledit dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage ne permettent pas de fournir une indication de position correcte de l'aéronef.In a particular embodiment, said radionavigation equipment is a landing aid device of the aircraft combined with a satellite positioning system, and said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device does not provide an indication of correct position of the aircraft.
Dans ce cas, de préférence, lesdits premiers évènements représentent au moins les situations suivantes :
- le nombre de satellites, desquels l'équipement de radionavigation reçoit des données, est insuffisant pour calculer une position de l'aéronef ;
- le niveau des signaux radiofréquence reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation est inférieur à une valeur prédéterminée ;
- il existe des anomalies dans des messages de navigation transmis par un satellite dudit système de positionnement ;
- un satellite dudit système de positionnement est exclu par une station sol dudit système de positionnement ;
- des corrections fournies par une station sol dudit système de positionnement, sont trop anciennes pour un satellite dudit système de positionnement ;
- une station sol dudit système de positionnement, n'est pas opérationnelle ;
- il existe un problème d'intégrité de données fournies par une station sol dudit système de positionnement ;
- il existe une perte d'un signal reçu d'une station sol dudit système de positionnement ;
- il existe une erreur de transmission d'un signal reçu d'une station sol dudit système de positionnement ; et
- il existe une perte d'un niveau de protection prédéterminé.
- the number of satellites, from which the radionavigation equipment receives data, is insufficient to calculate a position of the aircraft;
- the level of the radiofrequency signals received by said radionavigation equipment is less than a predetermined value;
- there are anomalies in navigation messages transmitted by a satellite of said positioning system;
- a satellite of said positioning system is excluded by a ground station of said positioning system;
- corrections provided by a ground station of said positioning system are too old for a satellite of said positioning system;
- a ground station of said positioning system is not operational;
- there is a data integrity problem provided by a ground station of said positioning system;
- there is a loss of a signal received from a ground station of said positioning system;
- there is a transmission error of a signal received from a ground station of said positioning system; and
- there is a loss of a predetermined level of protection.
La présente invention concerne également un dispositif de maintenance d'un aéronef.The present invention also relates to an aircraft maintenance device.
Selon l'invention, ledit dispositif est remarquable en ce qu'il comporte :
- un premier moyen d'enregistrement pour enregistrer sur un premier support d'enregistrement des premiers évènements relatifs à des données extérieures à l'aéronef, reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation;
- un second moyen d'enregistrement pour enregistrer sur un second support d'enregistrement des seconds évènements relatifs à des dysfonctionnements intervenant à bord de l'aéronef; et
- des moyens pour permettre l'analyse desdits premiers et seconds évènements enregistrés sur lesdits premiers et seconds supports d'enregistrement, afin de déterminer si ledit équipement de radionavigation doit être déposé ou non.
- first recording means for recording on a first recording medium first events relating to data external to the aircraft, received by said radionavigation equipment;
- second recording means for recording on a second recording medium second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft; and
- means for enabling analysis of said first and second events recorded on said first and second recording media to determine whether or not said radionavigation equipment is to be deposited.
Dans un mode de réalisation particulier:
- ledit premier moyen d'enregistrement est un moyen d'enregistrement dudit équipement de radionavigation ; et/ou
- ledit second moyen d'enregistrement est un moyen d'enregistrement d'un système de l'aéronef, qui reçoit des informations dudit équipement de radionavigation.
- said first recording means is a recording means of said radionavigation equipment; and or
- said second recording means is a recording means of a system of the aircraft, which receives information from said radionavigation equipment.
Les figures du dessin annexé feront bien comprendre comment l'invention peut être réalisée. Sur ces figures, des références identiques désignent des éléments semblables.The figures of the appended drawing will make it clear how the invention can be realized. In these figures, identical references designate similar elements.
La figure 1 illustre schématiquement un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, auquel on applique un dispositif de maintenance conforme à l'invention.Figure 1 schematically illustrates a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, which is applied a maintenance device according to the invention.
La figure 2 est le schéma synoptique d'un dispositif de maintenance conforme à l'invention.Figure 2 is a block diagram of a maintenance device according to the invention.
Le dispositif 1 conforme à l'invention est destiné à la maintenance d'un équipement de radionavigation 2 d'un aéronef A, notamment d'un avion de transport civil.The
Ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 peut, notamment, être un appareil de mesure de distance de type DME ("Distance Measuring Equipment"), un radiophare omnidirectionnel VHF ("Very High Frequency"), un système de localisation de type GPS ("Global Positioning System") ou un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de type GLS ("GPS Landing System").Said
Comme on peut le voir sur la figure 1, ledit équipement de radionavigation 2, de type usuel, qui est agencé à bord de l'aéronef A, est susceptible de recevoir des données de l'extérieur de l'aéronef A, notamment sous forme d'ondes électromagnétiques OE, à l'aide par exemple d'une antenne 3. Il élabore à partir de ces données extérieures des informations, par exemple des informations ou indications de position, qu'il transmet, par l'intermédiaire de liaisons 4, à des systèmes utilisateurs 5 de l'aéronef A, notamment des systèmes de guidage ou des systèmes d'affichage.As can be seen in FIG. 1, said
Dans un mode de réalisation préféré, ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 est un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de l'aéronef A de type GLS, qui est combiné à un système de positionnement 6.In a preferred embodiment, said
Ce système de positionnement 6 comporte un ensemble de satellites S1, S2 et/ou de stations sol P1, P2 qui sont prévues sur terre T. Ces satellites S1, S2 et ces stations sol P1, P2 peuvent communiquer entre eux, et avec ledit équipement de radionavigation 2, à l'aide d'ondes électromagnétiques OE.This
Le dispositif de maintenance 1 est associé audit équipement de radionavigation 2, comme représenté de façon générale par une liaison 1 A en traits mixtes sur la figure 1, et comme précisé ci-dessous, et a pour but de permettre de réduire le nombre de cas, pour lesquels ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 doit être déposé pour vérification et réparation éventuelle lorsque cet équipement 2 est suspecté d'être à l'origine d'un dysfonctionnement intervenu à bord de l'aéronef A.The
Pour ce faire, ledit dispositif 1 comporte, comme représenté sur la figure 2 :
- un moyen d'enregistrement usuel 7 pour enregistrer sur
un support d'enregistrement 8, comme illustré par uneliaison 9 en traits mixtes, dans une première liste, des premiers évènements relatifs à des données extérieures à l'aéronef A, reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 ; - un moyen d'enregistrement usuel 10 pour enregistrer sur
un support d'enregistrement 11, comme illustré par uneliaison 12 en traits mixtes, dans une seconde liste, des seconds évènements relatifs à des dysfonctionnements intervenant à bord de l'aéronef A ; et - une unité centrale 13 qui est reliée par des
liaisons 14 et 15 respectivement auxdits supportsd'enregistrement 8et 11, pour permettre l'analyse desdits premiers et seconds évènements enregistrés sur lesdits supports d'enregistrement 8et 11, afin de déterminer si ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 doit être déposé ou non.
- a usual recording means 7 for recording on a
recording medium 8, as illustrated by alink 9 in phantom, in a first list, first events relating to data outside the aircraft A, received by saidequipment radionavigation 2; - conventional recording means 10 for recording on a
recording medium 11, as illustrated by a dashed line linkage, in a second list, second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft A; and - a
central unit 13 which is connected by 14 and 15 respectively to saidlinks 8 and 11, to allow the analysis of said first and second events recorded on saidrecording media 8 and 11, to determine whether saidrecording media equipment radionavigation 2 must be filed or not.
Pour ce faire, selon l'invention, on vérifie si ladite seconde liste comporte au moins un second évènement, et :
- si ladite seconde liste ne comporte aucun second évènement, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 ; et
- si elle comporte au moins un second évènement relatif à un dysfonctionnement, on analyse tous les seconds évènements de ladite seconde liste, et :
- α) si aucun desdits seconds évènements n'est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation 2, on ne dépose pas cet équipement de radionavigation 2 ; et
- β) si au moins l'un desdits seconds évènements est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation 2, on analyse tous les premiers évènements de ladite première liste, et :
- β1) si lesdits premiers évènements permettent de prouver que le ou les dysfonctionnements qui sont intervenus à bord de l'aéronef A, sont dus à des problèmes relatifs auxdites données extérieures à l'aéronef A, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 ;
- β2) sinon (si une telle preuve n'est pas possible), on dépose ledit équipement de radionavigation 2.
- if said second list does not include any second event, said
radionavigation equipment 2 is not deposited; and - if it comprises at least one second event relating to a malfunction, analyzing all the second events of said second list, and:
- α) if none of said second events is relative to said
radionavigation equipment 2, thisradionavigation equipment 2 is not deposited; and - β) if at least one of said second events is relative to said
radionavigation equipment 2, all the first events of said first list are analyzed, and:- β1) if said first events make it possible to prove that the malfunction (s) that occurred on board the aircraft A, are due to problems relating to said data outside the aircraft A, it does not deposit said
radionavigation equipment 2; - β2) otherwise (if such proof is not possible), said
radionavigation equipment 2 is deposited.
- β1) if said first events make it possible to prove that the malfunction (s) that occurred on board the aircraft A, are due to problems relating to said data outside the aircraft A, it does not deposit said
- α) if none of said second events is relative to said
Ladite unité centrale 13 comporte un moyen 16 et un écran d'affichage 17 qui est relié par une liaison 18 audit moyen 16.Said
Dans un premier mode de réalisation, ledit moyen 16 est une unité d'acquisition d'informations, qui reçoit lesdites premières et secondes listes et les affiche sur l'écran d'affichage 17. Dans ce cas, l'analyse ou vérification précédente est mise en oeuvre par un opérateur de maintenance, à la lecture desdites deux listes qui lui sont présentées sur l'écran d'affichage 17.In a first embodiment, said means 16 is an information acquisition unit, which receives said first and second lists and displays them on the
Dans un second mode de réalisation, ledit moyen 16 est une unité de traitement d'informations, qui met en oeuvre automatiquement l'analyse ou vérification précédente, à partir desdites deux listes reçues, et qui présente le résultat de cette analyse (dépose ou non de l'équipement de radionavigation 2) à un opérateur de maintenance en l'affichant sur l'écran d'affichage 17.In a second embodiment, said means 16 is an information processing unit, which automatically implements the preceding analysis or verification, from said two lists received, and which presents the result of this analysis (removal or not). radio navigation equipment 2) to a maintenance operator by displaying it on the
De préférence, l'enregistrement précité des premiers et des seconds évènements est réalisé pendant le vol de l'aéronef A, et l'analyse ou vérification desdits enregistrements est réalisée ultérieurement, après le retour au sol de cet aéronef A.Preferably, the aforementioned recording of the first and second events is performed during the flight of the aircraft A, and the analysis or verification of said recordings is performed later, after the return of the aircraft A.
Grâce à l'invention, ledit dispositif de maintenance 1 présente l'avantage d'éviter de déposer (et d'envoyer en réparation) un équipement de radionavigation 2, lorsque cet équipement 2 n'a pas pu fournir des informations valides à d'autres systèmes 5 de l'aéronef A, alors que l'origine du fait qu'il n'a pas pu fournir ces informations ne lui était pas imputable, mais était imputable à des causes extérieures à l'aéronef A. Ce dispositif de maintenance 1 est donc très avantageux en termes de durée et de coût de maintenance.Thanks to the invention, said
Dans le mode de réalisation préféré précité relatif à un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de type GLS, l'équipement de radionavigation 2 met en oeuvre une fonction complexe, puisqu'il utilise des données extérieures provenant d'un segment spatial (signaux radiofréquence RF transmis par des satellites GPS, par exemple les satellites S1 et S2) et d'un segment sol (liaison de données VHF transmise par des stations sol GPS différentiel, par exemple les stations sol P1 et P2).In the aforementioned preferred embodiment relating to a GLS landing aid device, the
Les signaux RF et les données VHF sont regroupées, sur la figure 1, sous la référence OE désignant de façon générale des ondes électromagnétiques.The RF signals and the VHF data are grouped in FIG. 1 under the reference OE generally denoting electromagnetic waves.
Dans ce cas, lesdits premiers évènements enregistrés représentent les situations, pour lesquelles les données extérieures reçues par ledit dispositif 2 d'aide à l'atterrissage ne permettent pas de fournir une indication de position correcte de l'aéronef A.In this case, said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said
Ces premiers évènements sont, notamment, les suivants :
- nombre de satellites "GPS" S1 et S2 (desquels l'équipement de radionavigation 2 reçoit des données) insuffisant pour calculer une position de l'aéronef A :
- ■ niveau des signaux radiofréquence (reçus d'un satellite S1, S2) inférieur à une valeur en deçà de laquelle l'équipement de radionavigation 2 ne peut pas exploiter lesdits signaux ;
- ■ anomalies dans les messages de navigation transmis par un satellite S1, S2 ;
- ■ satellite S1, S2 exclu par une station sol P1, P2 (lorsque la station sol P1, P2 détermine que les données reçues de ce satellite S1, S2 ne sont pas fiables) ;
- ■ corrections fournies par une station sol P1, P2 trop anciennes pour un satellite S1, S2 ;
- informations relatives à une station sol P1, P2 :
- ■ station sol P1, P2 non opérationnelle (station en maintenance, invalidation de l'approche) ;
- ■ problème d'intégrité des données fournies par la station sol P1, P2 ;
- perte du signal reçu d'une station sol P1, P2 (niveau du signal reçu inférieur à une valeur prédéterminée ou anomalie radiofréquence) ;
- erreur de transmission du signal reçu d'une station sol (P1, P2) ; et
- perte des niveaux de protection : l'équipement GLS calcule une "sphère de confiance" autour de la position GLS calculée. Si le rayon de cette sphère de confiance dépasse un seuil (appelé "alarme limite"), les informations fournies par l'équipement GLS à des systèmes 5 de l'aéronef A sont invalidées. La valeur de ce seuil peut être envoyée à l'aéronef A par une station sol P1, P2. Elle peut également être une valeur prédéterminée.
- number of "GPS" satellites S1 and S2 (from which the
radionavigation equipment 2 receives data) insufficient to calculate a position of the aircraft A:- ■ level of radiofrequency signals (received from a satellite S1, S2) less than a value below which the
radionavigation equipment 2 can not operate said signals; - ■ anomalies in the navigation messages transmitted by a satellite S1, S2;
- ■ satellite S1, S2 excluded by a ground station P1, P2 (when the ground station P1, P2 determines that the data received from this satellite S1, S2 are unreliable);
- ■ corrections provided by a ground station P1, P2 too old for a satellite S1, S2;
- ■ level of radiofrequency signals (received from a satellite S1, S2) less than a value below which the
- information relating to a ground station P1, P2:
- ■ ground station P1, P2 not operational (station in maintenance, invalidation of the approach);
- ■ data integrity issue provided by ground station P1, P2;
- loss of the signal received from a ground station P1, P2 (received signal level less than a predetermined value or radiofrequency anomaly);
- transmission error of the signal received from a ground station (P1, P2); and
- loss of protection levels: the GLS device calculates a "confidence sphere" around the calculated GLS position. If the radius of this sphere of confidence exceeds a threshold (called "limit alarm"), the information provided by the GLS equipment to
systems 5 of the aircraft A are invalidated. The value of this threshold can be sent to the aircraft A by a ground station P1, P2. It can also be a predetermined value.
Claims (10)
- A maintenance process for a radionavigation installation (2) of an aircraft (A), according to which in a step b) second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft (A) are recorded in a second list, as appropriate,
characterized in that, moreover:a) first events relating to data external to the aircraft (A), received by said radionavigation installation (2), are recorded in a first list, as appropriate;c) a check is carried out to verify whether said second list comprises at least one second event relating to a malfunction, and:c1) if said second list comprises no second event, said radionavigation installation (2) is not disassembled; andc2) if said second list comprises at least one second event relating to a malfunction, then all the second events of said second list are analyzed, and:α) if none of said second events relates to said radionavigation installation (2), then said radionavigation installation (2) is not disassembled; andβ) if at least one of said second events relates to said radionavigation installation (2), then all the first events of said first list are analyzed, and:β1) if said first events make it possible to prove that the various malfunctions are due to problems relating to said data external to the aircraft (A), then said radionavigation installation (2) is not disassembled;β2) otherwise, said radionavigation installation (2) is disassembled. - The process as claimed in claim 1,
characterized in that said steps a) and b) are implemented during the flight of the aircraft (A) and said step c) is implemented at the end of said flight, after the aircraft (A) has returned to the ground. - The process as claimed in one of claims 1 and 2,
characterized in that said first events are recorded on a recording medium (8) of said radionavigation installation (2), and wherein said second events are recorded on a recording medium (11) of a system (5) of the aircraft (A), which receives information from said radionavigation installation (2). - The process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims,
characterized in that said radionavigation installation (2) is a landing aid device of the aircraft (A) combined with a positioning system (6) based on satellites (S1, S2) and wherein said first events recorded represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device (2) do not make it possible to supply a correct position indication of the aircraft (A). - The process as claimed in claim 4,
characterized in that said first events represent at least the following situations:- the number of satellites (S1, S2), from which the radionavigation installation (2) receives data, is insufficient to compute a position of the aircraft (A);- the level of the radiofrequency signals received by said radionavigation installation (2) is below a predetermined value;- anomalies exist in navigation messages transmitted by a satellite (S1, S2) of said positioning system (6) ;- a satellite (S1, S2) of said positioning system (6) is excluded by a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6);- corrections supplied by a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6) are too old for a satellite (S1, S2) of said positioning system (6);- a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6) is not operational;- there exists a problem with the integrity of data supplied by a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6);- there exists a loss of a signal received from a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6) ;- there exists an error of transmission of a signal received from a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6); and- there exists a loss of a predetermined level of protection. - A maintenance device for a radionavigation installation (2) of an aircraft (A), said device including:- a second means of recording (10) for recording on a second recording medium (11) second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft (A); and- a central unit (13) for making it possible to analyze recorded events so as to aid to determine whether said radionavigation installation (2) should or should not be disassembled,characterized in that it moreover comprises a first means of recording (7) for recording on a first recording medium (8) first events relating to data external to the aircraft (A), received by said radionavigation installation (2), and in that said central unit (13) is formed to receive said first and second events recorded in said first and second recording media (8,11) and to make it possible to analyze said first and second events so as to aid to determine whether said radionavigation installation (2) should or should not be disassembled.
- The device as claimed in claim 6,
characterized in that said first means of recording (8) is a means of recording of said radionavigation installation (2). - The device as claimed in one of claims 6 and 7,
characterized in that said second means of recording (11) is a means of recording of a system (5) of the aircraft (A), which receives information from said radionavigation installation (2). - An aircraft,
characterized in that it comprises a device (1) such as that as specified under any one of claims 6 to 8. - An aircraft,
characterized in that it comprises a device (1) able to implement the process specified under any one of claims 1 to 5.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0310497 | 2003-09-05 | ||
FR0310497A FR2859556B1 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2003-09-05 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE OF A RADIONAVIGATION EQUIPMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1512628A1 EP1512628A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 |
EP1512628B1 true EP1512628B1 (en) | 2006-09-27 |
Family
ID=34130754
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04291980A Expired - Lifetime EP1512628B1 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2004-08-03 | Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7519456B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1512628B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE340736T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2478779C (en) |
DE (1) | DE602004002535T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2271806T3 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2859556B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2859556B1 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-11-11 | Airbus France | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE OF A RADIONAVIGATION EQUIPMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT |
FR2914803B1 (en) * | 2007-04-06 | 2009-09-18 | Airbus Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE IN AN AIRCRAFT |
FR2925595B1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2014-06-13 | Snecma Services | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CHARACTERIZING AND COUNTING A THRESHOLD EXCEEDS BY AN OPERATING PARAMETER OF AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE |
Family Cites Families (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4729102A (en) * | 1984-10-24 | 1988-03-01 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Aircraft data acquisition and recording system |
US4943919A (en) * | 1988-10-17 | 1990-07-24 | The Boeing Company | Central maintenance computer system and fault data handling method |
US5216611A (en) * | 1991-02-08 | 1993-06-01 | Rockwell International Corporation | Integrated enroute and approach guidance system for aircraft |
CA2072169A1 (en) * | 1991-06-24 | 1992-12-25 | Lih-Juan L. Danielson | In-band/out-of-band alert delivery system |
US5561686A (en) * | 1991-08-23 | 1996-10-01 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Radio information communication system using multi-carrier spread spectrum transmission system |
US5957995A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-09-28 | Trimble Navigation | Radio navigation emulating GPS system |
US5890079A (en) * | 1996-12-17 | 1999-03-30 | Levine; Seymour | Remote aircraft flight recorder and advisory system |
US6324592B1 (en) * | 1997-02-25 | 2001-11-27 | Keystone Aerospace | Apparatus and method for a mobile computer architecture and input/output management system |
US6115656A (en) * | 1997-06-17 | 2000-09-05 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Fault recording and reporting method |
US6115654A (en) * | 1997-12-23 | 2000-09-05 | Simmonds Precision Products, Inc. | Universal sensor interface system and method |
US6313786B1 (en) * | 1998-07-02 | 2001-11-06 | Snaptrack, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measurement processing of satellite positioning system (SPS) signals |
DE19839193A1 (en) * | 1998-08-28 | 2000-03-02 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Device for controlling and monitoring a vehicle |
WO2001001366A2 (en) * | 1999-06-25 | 2001-01-04 | Telemonitor, Inc. | Smart remote monitoring system and method |
DE10007218B4 (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2009-11-26 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for event interpretation and issuing of operating instructions in motor vehicles |
US6598179B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2003-07-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Table-based error log analysis |
SE518104C2 (en) * | 2000-06-13 | 2002-08-27 | Saab Ab | Software maintenance system and method |
US6693558B2 (en) * | 2001-06-18 | 2004-02-17 | Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. | Aircraft flat panel display system |
DE10153151A1 (en) * | 2001-10-27 | 2003-05-15 | Airbus Gmbh | Diagnostic system and diagnostic procedures to support aircraft maintenance |
FR2859556B1 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-11-11 | Airbus France | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE OF A RADIONAVIGATION EQUIPMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT |
US7149612B2 (en) * | 2004-01-05 | 2006-12-12 | Arinc Incorporated | System and method for monitoring and reporting aircraft quick access recorder data |
FR2875901B1 (en) * | 2004-09-28 | 2006-12-08 | Eurocopter France | ONBOARD SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTING AN AIR ROAD |
-
2003
- 2003-09-05 FR FR0310497A patent/FR2859556B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-08-03 EP EP04291980A patent/EP1512628B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-08-03 DE DE602004002535T patent/DE602004002535T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-08-03 ES ES04291980T patent/ES2271806T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-08-03 AT AT04291980T patent/ATE340736T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-08-09 CA CA2478779A patent/CA2478779C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-09-03 US US10/933,500 patent/US7519456B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2478779A1 (en) | 2005-03-05 |
ATE340736T1 (en) | 2006-10-15 |
DE602004002535T2 (en) | 2007-09-06 |
DE602004002535D1 (en) | 2006-11-09 |
US20060293803A1 (en) | 2006-12-28 |
CA2478779C (en) | 2014-06-03 |
FR2859556B1 (en) | 2005-11-11 |
FR2859556A1 (en) | 2005-03-11 |
US7519456B2 (en) | 2009-04-14 |
ES2271806T3 (en) | 2007-04-16 |
EP1512628A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2693232B1 (en) | Method for monitoring the integrity of radio-navigation stations in a satellite augmentation system | |
JP3281015B2 (en) | Aircraft position monitoring system | |
EP1989510B1 (en) | Hybrid positioning method and device | |
EP0780746B1 (en) | Monitoring system for a complex system, especially for an aircraft | |
EP1992958B1 (en) | Method and system for satellite positioning | |
FR3030057A1 (en) | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VALIDATION OF SATELLITE GEOLOCATION | |
FR3010542A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTOMATICALLY MONITORING A FLIGHT TRACK OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE OPERATION REQUIRED. | |
EP2386875A1 (en) | Verteiltes Entfernungsmesssystem für die Lokalisierung eines geostationären Satelliten | |
WO2007010116A1 (en) | Method and device for determining the ground position of a mobile object, in particular an aircraft on an airport | |
WO2005086113A1 (en) | Automatic method for transmitting monitoring alarms from an aircraft to the ground | |
EP1083442A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for motor vehicle radar alignment | |
EP2998765A1 (en) | System for excluding a failure of a satellite in a gnss system | |
EP1460504A1 (en) | System for piloting an aircraft, at least for piloting the aircraft during a non precision approach to landing | |
EP2765390B1 (en) | System and method for assisting with the navigation of an aircraft | |
EP1512628B1 (en) | Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft | |
EP1577644A1 (en) | Method for real-time guidance of a terrestrial vehicle equipped with an off-board navigation system | |
CA2615749A1 (en) | Device for assisting ground navigation of an aircraft on an airport | |
FR3054394B1 (en) | DEVICE FOR TRANSFERRING INFORMATION FROM AN AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FROM AN AIRCRAFT TO AN INDEPENDENT COMPUTER | |
FR3066612A1 (en) | SYSTEM FOR INCREASING A SATELLITE POSITIONING SYSTEM AND AUTONOMOUS INTEGRATED AUTONOMOUS MONITORING RECEIVER | |
FR2823857A1 (en) | METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF A TRANSMITTER BEACON | |
EP0899578B1 (en) | Method of localising the position of a fixed terminal employing a constellation of satellites | |
FR2966252A1 (en) | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INCREASING THE AVAILABILITY OF A SATELLITE GEOLOCATION SYSTEM | |
FR2922641A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECALING THE POSITION OF AN AIRCRAFT. | |
EP3106896B1 (en) | Space based or aeronautical augmentation system with simplified management of its navigation messages | |
FR2934364A1 (en) | Embarked satellite navigation system initializing method for airplane, involves receiving complementary data signal emitted by ground base, by satellite navigation system to determine aircraft position in combination with satellite signal |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL HR LT LV MK |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20050407 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20060927 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602004002535 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20061109 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061227 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061227 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070313 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2271806 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20070628 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE Effective date: 20070831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061228 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070831 |
|
PGRI | Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Effective date: 20081001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080831 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070803 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070328 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060927 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20090813 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20110721 AND 20110727 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CJ Effective date: 20110916 Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CD Owner name: AIRBUS HOLDING, FR Effective date: 20110916 Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CA Effective date: 20110916 Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP Owner name: AIRBUS HOLDING, FR Effective date: 20110913 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: PC2A Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS Effective date: 20120308 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602004002535 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602004002535 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS, FR Free format text: FORMER OWNER: AIRBUS FRANCE, TOULOUSE, FR Effective date: 20120326 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602004002535 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE Effective date: 20120326 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602004002535 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: ANWALTSKANZLEI MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE Effective date: 20120326 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100804 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20130829 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20130830 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140803 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20160104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140804 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20190822 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20190822 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20190821 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602004002535 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20200803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200831 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210302 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200803 |