[go: up one dir, main page]

EP1512628B1 - Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft - Google Patents

Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1512628B1
EP1512628B1 EP04291980A EP04291980A EP1512628B1 EP 1512628 B1 EP1512628 B1 EP 1512628B1 EP 04291980 A EP04291980 A EP 04291980A EP 04291980 A EP04291980 A EP 04291980A EP 1512628 B1 EP1512628 B1 EP 1512628B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
radionavigation
aircraft
installation
events
recording
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP04291980A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1512628A1 (en
Inventor
Dominique Pomies
Gilles Tatham
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations SAS
Original Assignee
Airbus Operations SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Operations SAS filed Critical Airbus Operations SAS
Publication of EP1512628A1 publication Critical patent/EP1512628A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1512628B1 publication Critical patent/EP1512628B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/006Indicating maintenance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/08Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
    • G07C5/0841Registering performance data
    • G07C5/085Registering performance data using electronic data carriers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a device for maintaining a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft.
  • aircraft radionavigation equipment such as a Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), a VHF (Very High Frequency) omnidirectional type GPS ("Global Positioning System”) or landing aid device type GLS ("GPS Landing System”), for example, receives data that is external to the aircraft and develops information, including information relating to the position of the aircraft, from said external data. It generally provides this information to other systems of the aircraft, including systems for guiding or displaying the position of the aircraft.
  • DME Distance Measuring Equipment
  • VHF Very High Frequency
  • GLS landing aid device type
  • the maintenance procedures provide that the said radionavigation equipment must be deposited and sent to a repairer to be checked and repaired if necessary.
  • the information provided by the radionavigation equipment may be erroneous, not only because of a failure of said radionavigation equipment, but also because of a problem relating to said external data received by said radionavigation equipment.
  • the usual maintenance procedures are unnecessarily long and costly, since the radionavigation equipment is deposited and sent for repair, while it is not failure, since said malfunction occurred on board the aircraft is due to said data outside the aircraft.
  • the present invention aims to overcome these disadvantages. It relates to a method of maintenance of a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, making it possible to reduce the number of cases, for which said radionavigation equipment must be deposited for verification and possible repair when this equipment is suspected of being at the expense of cause of a malfunction on board the aircraft.
  • said radionavigation equipment is deposited to send it for repair, only if said first recorded events can not prove that said malfunction is due to a problem relating to data outside the aircraft received by said radionavigation equipment, which of course allows to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary deposits, and therefore reduce the cost and maintenance time.
  • it implements said steps a) and b) during the flight of the aircraft, and said step c) at the end of said flight, after the return to the ground of the aircraft.
  • these first events are advantageously recorded on a recording medium of said radionavigation equipment, and said second events are recorded on a recording medium of a system of the aircraft, which receives information from said equipment. radionavigation.
  • said radionavigation equipment is a landing aid device of the aircraft combined with a satellite positioning system, and said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device does not provide an indication of correct position of the aircraft.
  • the present invention also relates to an aircraft maintenance device.
  • Figure 1 schematically illustrates a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, which is applied a maintenance device according to the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a maintenance device according to the invention.
  • the device 1 according to the invention is intended for the maintenance of a radionavigation equipment 2 of an aircraft A, in particular a civil transport aircraft.
  • Said radionavigation equipment 2 may, in particular, be a Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), a VHF omnidirectional beacon ("Very High Frequency"), a GPS positioning system ("Global Positioning”). System ”) or a landing aid of the GLS (“ GPS Landing System ”) type.
  • DME Distance Measuring Equipment
  • VHF omnidirectional beacon Very High Frequency
  • GPS positioning system Global Positioning
  • System GPS positioning system
  • GPS Landing System GPS Landing System
  • said radio navigation equipment 2 of the usual type, which is arranged on board the aircraft A, is capable of receiving data from outside the aircraft A, in particular in the form of electromagnetic waves OE, using for example an antenna 3. It develops from these external data information, for example information or position indications, which it transmits, via links 4 , to user systems 5 of the aircraft A, including guidance systems or display systems.
  • said radionavigation equipment 2 is a landing aid device for the GLS aircraft A, which is combined with a positioning system 6.
  • This positioning system 6 comprises a set of satellites S1, S2 and / or ground stations P1, P2 which are provided on earth T. These satellites S1, S2 and these ground stations P1, P2 can communicate with each other, and with said equipment of radionavigation 2, using electromagnetic waves OE.
  • the maintenance device 1 is associated with said radionavigation equipment 2, as represented generally by a link 1A in phantom in FIG. 1, and as specified below, and is intended to make it possible to reduce the number of cases. , for which said radionavigation equipment 2 must be deposited for verification and possible repair when this equipment 2 is suspected of causing a malfunction on board the aircraft A.
  • Said central unit 13 comprises a means 16 and a display screen 17 which is connected by a link 18 to said means 16.
  • said means 16 is an information acquisition unit, which receives said first and second lists and displays them on the display screen 17.
  • the previous analysis or verification is implemented by a maintenance operator, on reading said two lists which are presented to him on the display screen 17.
  • said means 16 is an information processing unit, which automatically implements the preceding analysis or verification, from said two lists received, and which presents the result of this analysis (removal or not).
  • radio navigation equipment 2 to a maintenance operator by displaying it on the display screen 17.
  • the aforementioned recording of the first and second events is performed during the flight of the aircraft A, and the analysis or verification of said recordings is performed later, after the return of the aircraft A.
  • said maintenance device 1 has the advantage of avoiding depositing (and sending for repair) a radio navigation equipment 2, when this equipment 2 could not provide valid information to other systems 5 of the aircraft A, while the origin of the fact that he could not provide this information was not attributable to him, but was attributable to causes outside the aircraft A.
  • This device maintenance 1 is therefore very advantageous in terms of duration and cost of maintenance.
  • the radio navigation equipment 2 implements a complex function, since it uses external data from a space segment (signals RF radiofrequency transmitted by GPS satellites, for example satellites S1 and S2) and a ground segment (VHF data link transmitted by differential GPS ground stations, for example ground stations P1 and P2).
  • a space segment signals RF radiofrequency transmitted by GPS satellites, for example satellites S1 and S2
  • a ground segment VHF data link transmitted by differential GPS ground stations, for example ground stations P1 and P2
  • the RF signals and the VHF data are grouped in FIG. 1 under the reference OE generally denoting electromagnetic waves.
  • said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device 2 do not make it possible to provide an indication of the correct position of the aircraft A.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Catching Or Destruction (AREA)

Abstract

The method involves disassembling radio navigation equipment (2) if one list has an event related to dysfunctions occurring on board of an aircraft. Another list having an event related to external data of the aircraft is analyzed if the former event is related to the equipment. The equipment is disassembled only if the event related to the data does not prove that the dysfunctions are due to problems related to the external data. The lists are stored in respective storage mediums. The external data is received by the equipment. An independent claim is also included for an aircraft having a maintenance device of radio navigation equipment.

Description

La présente invention concerne un procédé et un dispositif de maintenance d'un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, en particulier d'un avion de transport.The present invention relates to a method and a device for maintaining a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft.

On sait qu'un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, tel qu'un appareil de mesure de distance de type DME ("Distance Measuring Equipment"), un radiophare omnidirectionnel VHF ("Very High Frequency"), un système de localisation de type GPS ("Global Positioning System") ou un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de type GLS ("GPS Landing System") par exemple, reçoit des données qui sont extérieures à l'aéronef et élabore des informations, notamment des informations relatives à la position de l'aéronef, à partir desdites données extérieures. Il fournit généralement ces informations à d'autres systèmes de l'aéronef, notamment des systèmes de guidage ou d'affichage de la position de l'aéronef. Lorsqu'un dysfonctionnement survient à bord de l'aéronef, dont l'origine est identifiée comme provenant desdites informations qui sont fournies par ledit équipement de radionavigation à d'autres systèmes de l'aéronef, les procédures de maintenance prévoient que ledit équipement de radionavigation doit être déposé et envoyé chez un réparateur pour y être contrôlé et réparé si nécessaire.It is known that aircraft radionavigation equipment, such as a Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), a VHF (Very High Frequency) omnidirectional type GPS ("Global Positioning System") or landing aid device type GLS ("GPS Landing System"), for example, receives data that is external to the aircraft and develops information, including information relating to the position of the aircraft, from said external data. It generally provides this information to other systems of the aircraft, including systems for guiding or displaying the position of the aircraft. When a malfunction occurs on board the aircraft, the origin of which is identified as originating from the said information supplied by the said radionavigation equipment to other systems of the aircraft, the maintenance procedures provide that the said radionavigation equipment must be deposited and sent to a repairer to be checked and repaired if necessary.

Or, les informations fournies par l'équipement de radionavigation peuvent être erronées, non seulement en raison d'une défaillance dudit équipement de radionavigation, mais également en raison d'un problème relatif auxdites données extérieures reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation. Dans ce dernier cas, les procédures de maintenance usuelles s'avèrent inutilement longues et coûteuses, puisque l'équipement de radionavigation est déposé et envoyé en réparation, alors qu'il n'est pas en panne, puisque ledit dysfonctionnement survenu à bord de l'aéronef est dû auxdites données extérieures à l'aéronef.However, the information provided by the radionavigation equipment may be erroneous, not only because of a failure of said radionavigation equipment, but also because of a problem relating to said external data received by said radionavigation equipment. In the latter case, the usual maintenance procedures are unnecessarily long and costly, since the radionavigation equipment is deposited and sent for repair, while it is not failure, since said malfunction occurred on board the aircraft is due to said data outside the aircraft.

La présente invention a pour objet de remédier à ces inconvénients. Elle concerne un procédé de maintenance d'un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, permettant de réduire le nombre de cas, pour lesquels ledit équipement de radionavigation doit être déposé pour vérification et réparation éventuelle lorsque cet équipement est suspecté d'être à l'origine d'un dysfonctionnement intervenu à bord de l'aéronef.The present invention aims to overcome these disadvantages. It relates to a method of maintenance of a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, making it possible to reduce the number of cases, for which said radionavigation equipment must be deposited for verification and possible repair when this equipment is suspected of being at the expense of cause of a malfunction on board the aircraft.

Le Document US 6 115 656 décrit un dispositif selon le préambule de la revendication 6.Document US 6,115,656 describes a device according to the preamble of claim 6.

A cet effet, ledit procédé est remarquable, selon l'invention, en ce que :

  • a) on enregistre dans une première liste, le cas échéant, des premiers évènements relatifs à des données extérieures à l'aéronef, reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation ;
  • b) on enregistre dans une seconde liste, le cas échéant, des seconds évènements relatifs à des dysfonctionnements intervenant à bord de l'aéronef ;
  • c) on vérifie si ladite seconde liste comporte au moins un second événement relatif à un dysfonctionnement, et :
    • c1) si ladite seconde liste ne comporte aucun second évènement, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation ; et
    • c2) si ladite seconde liste comporte au moins un second évènement relatif à un dysfonctionnement, on analyse tous les seconds évènements de ladite seconde liste, et :
      • α) si aucun desdits seconds évènements n'est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation ; et
      • β) si au moins l'un desdits seconds évènements est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation, on analyse tous les premiers évènements de ladite première liste, et :
        • β1) si lesdits premiers évènements permettent de prouver que les différents dysfonctionnements sont dus à des problèmes relatifs auxdites données extérieures à l'aéronef, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation ;
        • β2) sinon, on dépose ledit équipement de radionavigation.
For this purpose, said method is remarkable, according to the invention, in that:
  • a) where appropriate, first events relating to data external to the aircraft received by said radionavigation equipment are recorded in a first list;
  • b) recording in a second list, if necessary, second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft;
  • c) checking whether said second list includes at least one second event relating to a malfunction, and
    • c1) if said second list does not include any second event, said radionavigation equipment is not deposited; and
    • c2) if said second list includes at least one second event relating to a malfunction, analyzing all the second events of said second list, and:
      • α) if none of said second events is relative to said radionavigation equipment, said radionavigation equipment is not deposited; and
      • β) if at least one of said second events is relative to said radionavigation equipment, all the first events of said first list are analyzed, and:
        • β1) if said first events make it possible to prove that the various malfunctions are due to problems relating to said data external to the aircraft, said radionavigation equipment is not deposited;
        • β2) otherwise, said radionavigation equipment is deposited.

Ainsi, grâce à l'invention, on dépose ledit équipement de radionavigation pour l'envoyer en réparation, uniquement si lesdits premiers évènements enregistrés ne permettent pas de prouver que ledit dysfonctionnement est dû à un problème relatif aux données extérieures à l'aéronef reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation, ce qui permet bien entendu de réduire considérablement le nombre de déposes inutiles, et donc, de diminuer le coût et la durée de maintenance.Thus, thanks to the invention, said radionavigation equipment is deposited to send it for repair, only if said first recorded events can not prove that said malfunction is due to a problem relating to data outside the aircraft received by said radionavigation equipment, which of course allows to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary deposits, and therefore reduce the cost and maintenance time.

De préférence, on met en oeuvre lesdites étapes a) et b) pendant le vol de l'aéronef, et ladite étape c) à la fin dudit vol, après le retour au sol de l'aéronef.Preferably, it implements said steps a) and b) during the flight of the aircraft, and said step c) at the end of said flight, after the return to the ground of the aircraft.

En outre, de façon avantageuse, on enregistre lesdits premiers évènements sur un support d'enregistrement dudit équipement de radionavigation, et on enregistre lesdits seconds évènements sur un support d'enregistrement d'un système de l'aéronef, qui reçoit des informations dudit équipement de radionavigation.In addition, these first events are advantageously recorded on a recording medium of said radionavigation equipment, and said second events are recorded on a recording medium of a system of the aircraft, which receives information from said equipment. radionavigation.

Dans un mode de réalisation particulier, ledit équipement de radionavigation est un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de l'aéronef combiné à un système de positionnement par satellites, et lesdits premiers évènements enregistrés représentent les situations, pour lesquelles les données extérieures reçues par ledit dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage ne permettent pas de fournir une indication de position correcte de l'aéronef.In a particular embodiment, said radionavigation equipment is a landing aid device of the aircraft combined with a satellite positioning system, and said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device does not provide an indication of correct position of the aircraft.

Dans ce cas, de préférence, lesdits premiers évènements représentent au moins les situations suivantes :

  • le nombre de satellites, desquels l'équipement de radionavigation reçoit des données, est insuffisant pour calculer une position de l'aéronef ;
  • le niveau des signaux radiofréquence reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation est inférieur à une valeur prédéterminée ;
  • il existe des anomalies dans des messages de navigation transmis par un satellite dudit système de positionnement ;
  • un satellite dudit système de positionnement est exclu par une station sol dudit système de positionnement ;
  • des corrections fournies par une station sol dudit système de positionnement, sont trop anciennes pour un satellite dudit système de positionnement ;
  • une station sol dudit système de positionnement, n'est pas opérationnelle ;
  • il existe un problème d'intégrité de données fournies par une station sol dudit système de positionnement ;
  • il existe une perte d'un signal reçu d'une station sol dudit système de positionnement ;
  • il existe une erreur de transmission d'un signal reçu d'une station sol dudit système de positionnement ; et
  • il existe une perte d'un niveau de protection prédéterminé.
In this case, preferably, said first events represent at least the following situations:
  • the number of satellites, from which the radionavigation equipment receives data, is insufficient to calculate a position of the aircraft;
  • the level of the radiofrequency signals received by said radionavigation equipment is less than a predetermined value;
  • there are anomalies in navigation messages transmitted by a satellite of said positioning system;
  • a satellite of said positioning system is excluded by a ground station of said positioning system;
  • corrections provided by a ground station of said positioning system are too old for a satellite of said positioning system;
  • a ground station of said positioning system is not operational;
  • there is a data integrity problem provided by a ground station of said positioning system;
  • there is a loss of a signal received from a ground station of said positioning system;
  • there is a transmission error of a signal received from a ground station of said positioning system; and
  • there is a loss of a predetermined level of protection.

La présente invention concerne également un dispositif de maintenance d'un aéronef.The present invention also relates to an aircraft maintenance device.

Selon l'invention, ledit dispositif est remarquable en ce qu'il comporte :

  • un premier moyen d'enregistrement pour enregistrer sur un premier support d'enregistrement des premiers évènements relatifs à des données extérieures à l'aéronef, reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation;
  • un second moyen d'enregistrement pour enregistrer sur un second support d'enregistrement des seconds évènements relatifs à des dysfonctionnements intervenant à bord de l'aéronef; et
  • des moyens pour permettre l'analyse desdits premiers et seconds évènements enregistrés sur lesdits premiers et seconds supports d'enregistrement, afin de déterminer si ledit équipement de radionavigation doit être déposé ou non.
According to the invention, said device is remarkable in that it comprises:
  • first recording means for recording on a first recording medium first events relating to data external to the aircraft, received by said radionavigation equipment;
  • second recording means for recording on a second recording medium second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft; and
  • means for enabling analysis of said first and second events recorded on said first and second recording media to determine whether or not said radionavigation equipment is to be deposited.

Dans un mode de réalisation particulier:

  • ledit premier moyen d'enregistrement est un moyen d'enregistrement dudit équipement de radionavigation ; et/ou
  • ledit second moyen d'enregistrement est un moyen d'enregistrement d'un système de l'aéronef, qui reçoit des informations dudit équipement de radionavigation.
In a particular embodiment:
  • said first recording means is a recording means of said radionavigation equipment; and or
  • said second recording means is a recording means of a system of the aircraft, which receives information from said radionavigation equipment.

Les figures du dessin annexé feront bien comprendre comment l'invention peut être réalisée. Sur ces figures, des références identiques désignent des éléments semblables.The figures of the appended drawing will make it clear how the invention can be realized. In these figures, identical references designate similar elements.

La figure 1 illustre schématiquement un équipement de radionavigation d'un aéronef, auquel on applique un dispositif de maintenance conforme à l'invention.Figure 1 schematically illustrates a radionavigation equipment of an aircraft, which is applied a maintenance device according to the invention.

La figure 2 est le schéma synoptique d'un dispositif de maintenance conforme à l'invention.Figure 2 is a block diagram of a maintenance device according to the invention.

Le dispositif 1 conforme à l'invention est destiné à la maintenance d'un équipement de radionavigation 2 d'un aéronef A, notamment d'un avion de transport civil.The device 1 according to the invention is intended for the maintenance of a radionavigation equipment 2 of an aircraft A, in particular a civil transport aircraft.

Ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 peut, notamment, être un appareil de mesure de distance de type DME ("Distance Measuring Equipment"), un radiophare omnidirectionnel VHF ("Very High Frequency"), un système de localisation de type GPS ("Global Positioning System") ou un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de type GLS ("GPS Landing System").Said radionavigation equipment 2 may, in particular, be a Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), a VHF omnidirectional beacon ("Very High Frequency"), a GPS positioning system ("Global Positioning"). System ") or a landing aid of the GLS (" GPS Landing System ") type.

Comme on peut le voir sur la figure 1, ledit équipement de radionavigation 2, de type usuel, qui est agencé à bord de l'aéronef A, est susceptible de recevoir des données de l'extérieur de l'aéronef A, notamment sous forme d'ondes électromagnétiques OE, à l'aide par exemple d'une antenne 3. Il élabore à partir de ces données extérieures des informations, par exemple des informations ou indications de position, qu'il transmet, par l'intermédiaire de liaisons 4, à des systèmes utilisateurs 5 de l'aéronef A, notamment des systèmes de guidage ou des systèmes d'affichage.As can be seen in FIG. 1, said radio navigation equipment 2, of the usual type, which is arranged on board the aircraft A, is capable of receiving data from outside the aircraft A, in particular in the form of electromagnetic waves OE, using for example an antenna 3. It develops from these external data information, for example information or position indications, which it transmits, via links 4 , to user systems 5 of the aircraft A, including guidance systems or display systems.

Dans un mode de réalisation préféré, ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 est un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de l'aéronef A de type GLS, qui est combiné à un système de positionnement 6.In a preferred embodiment, said radionavigation equipment 2 is a landing aid device for the GLS aircraft A, which is combined with a positioning system 6.

Ce système de positionnement 6 comporte un ensemble de satellites S1, S2 et/ou de stations sol P1, P2 qui sont prévues sur terre T. Ces satellites S1, S2 et ces stations sol P1, P2 peuvent communiquer entre eux, et avec ledit équipement de radionavigation 2, à l'aide d'ondes électromagnétiques OE.This positioning system 6 comprises a set of satellites S1, S2 and / or ground stations P1, P2 which are provided on earth T. These satellites S1, S2 and these ground stations P1, P2 can communicate with each other, and with said equipment of radionavigation 2, using electromagnetic waves OE.

Le dispositif de maintenance 1 est associé audit équipement de radionavigation 2, comme représenté de façon générale par une liaison 1 A en traits mixtes sur la figure 1, et comme précisé ci-dessous, et a pour but de permettre de réduire le nombre de cas, pour lesquels ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 doit être déposé pour vérification et réparation éventuelle lorsque cet équipement 2 est suspecté d'être à l'origine d'un dysfonctionnement intervenu à bord de l'aéronef A.The maintenance device 1 is associated with said radionavigation equipment 2, as represented generally by a link 1A in phantom in FIG. 1, and as specified below, and is intended to make it possible to reduce the number of cases. , for which said radionavigation equipment 2 must be deposited for verification and possible repair when this equipment 2 is suspected of causing a malfunction on board the aircraft A.

Pour ce faire, ledit dispositif 1 comporte, comme représenté sur la figure 2 :

  • un moyen d'enregistrement usuel 7 pour enregistrer sur un support d'enregistrement 8, comme illustré par une liaison 9 en traits mixtes, dans une première liste, des premiers évènements relatifs à des données extérieures à l'aéronef A, reçues par ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 ;
  • un moyen d'enregistrement usuel 10 pour enregistrer sur un support d'enregistrement 11, comme illustré par une liaison 12 en traits mixtes, dans une seconde liste, des seconds évènements relatifs à des dysfonctionnements intervenant à bord de l'aéronef A ; et
  • une unité centrale 13 qui est reliée par des liaisons 14 et 15 respectivement auxdits supports d'enregistrement 8 et 11, pour permettre l'analyse desdits premiers et seconds évènements enregistrés sur lesdits supports d'enregistrement 8 et 11, afin de déterminer si ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 doit être déposé ou non.
To do this, said device 1 comprises, as represented in FIG. 2:
  • a usual recording means 7 for recording on a recording medium 8, as illustrated by a link 9 in phantom, in a first list, first events relating to data outside the aircraft A, received by said equipment radionavigation 2;
  • conventional recording means 10 for recording on a recording medium 11, as illustrated by a dashed line linkage, in a second list, second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft A; and
  • a central unit 13 which is connected by links 14 and 15 respectively to said recording media 8 and 11, to allow the analysis of said first and second events recorded on said recording media 8 and 11, to determine whether said equipment radionavigation 2 must be filed or not.

Pour ce faire, selon l'invention, on vérifie si ladite seconde liste comporte au moins un second évènement, et :

  • si ladite seconde liste ne comporte aucun second évènement, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 ; et
  • si elle comporte au moins un second évènement relatif à un dysfonctionnement, on analyse tous les seconds évènements de ladite seconde liste, et :
    • α) si aucun desdits seconds évènements n'est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation 2, on ne dépose pas cet équipement de radionavigation 2 ; et
    • β) si au moins l'un desdits seconds évènements est relatif audit équipement de radionavigation 2, on analyse tous les premiers évènements de ladite première liste, et :
      • β1) si lesdits premiers évènements permettent de prouver que le ou les dysfonctionnements qui sont intervenus à bord de l'aéronef A, sont dus à des problèmes relatifs auxdites données extérieures à l'aéronef A, on ne dépose pas ledit équipement de radionavigation 2 ;
      • β2) sinon (si une telle preuve n'est pas possible), on dépose ledit équipement de radionavigation 2.
To do this, according to the invention, it is checked whether said second list comprises at least one second event, and:
  • if said second list does not include any second event, said radionavigation equipment 2 is not deposited; and
  • if it comprises at least one second event relating to a malfunction, analyzing all the second events of said second list, and:
    • α) if none of said second events is relative to said radionavigation equipment 2, this radionavigation equipment 2 is not deposited; and
    • β) if at least one of said second events is relative to said radionavigation equipment 2, all the first events of said first list are analyzed, and:
      • β1) if said first events make it possible to prove that the malfunction (s) that occurred on board the aircraft A, are due to problems relating to said data outside the aircraft A, it does not deposit said radionavigation equipment 2;
      • β2) otherwise (if such proof is not possible), said radionavigation equipment 2 is deposited.

Ladite unité centrale 13 comporte un moyen 16 et un écran d'affichage 17 qui est relié par une liaison 18 audit moyen 16.Said central unit 13 comprises a means 16 and a display screen 17 which is connected by a link 18 to said means 16.

Dans un premier mode de réalisation, ledit moyen 16 est une unité d'acquisition d'informations, qui reçoit lesdites premières et secondes listes et les affiche sur l'écran d'affichage 17. Dans ce cas, l'analyse ou vérification précédente est mise en oeuvre par un opérateur de maintenance, à la lecture desdites deux listes qui lui sont présentées sur l'écran d'affichage 17.In a first embodiment, said means 16 is an information acquisition unit, which receives said first and second lists and displays them on the display screen 17. In this case, the previous analysis or verification is implemented by a maintenance operator, on reading said two lists which are presented to him on the display screen 17.

Dans un second mode de réalisation, ledit moyen 16 est une unité de traitement d'informations, qui met en oeuvre automatiquement l'analyse ou vérification précédente, à partir desdites deux listes reçues, et qui présente le résultat de cette analyse (dépose ou non de l'équipement de radionavigation 2) à un opérateur de maintenance en l'affichant sur l'écran d'affichage 17.In a second embodiment, said means 16 is an information processing unit, which automatically implements the preceding analysis or verification, from said two lists received, and which presents the result of this analysis (removal or not). radio navigation equipment 2) to a maintenance operator by displaying it on the display screen 17.

De préférence, l'enregistrement précité des premiers et des seconds évènements est réalisé pendant le vol de l'aéronef A, et l'analyse ou vérification desdits enregistrements est réalisée ultérieurement, après le retour au sol de cet aéronef A.Preferably, the aforementioned recording of the first and second events is performed during the flight of the aircraft A, and the analysis or verification of said recordings is performed later, after the return of the aircraft A.

Grâce à l'invention, ledit dispositif de maintenance 1 présente l'avantage d'éviter de déposer (et d'envoyer en réparation) un équipement de radionavigation 2, lorsque cet équipement 2 n'a pas pu fournir des informations valides à d'autres systèmes 5 de l'aéronef A, alors que l'origine du fait qu'il n'a pas pu fournir ces informations ne lui était pas imputable, mais était imputable à des causes extérieures à l'aéronef A. Ce dispositif de maintenance 1 est donc très avantageux en termes de durée et de coût de maintenance.Thanks to the invention, said maintenance device 1 has the advantage of avoiding depositing (and sending for repair) a radio navigation equipment 2, when this equipment 2 could not provide valid information to other systems 5 of the aircraft A, while the origin of the fact that he could not provide this information was not attributable to him, but was attributable to causes outside the aircraft A. This device maintenance 1 is therefore very advantageous in terms of duration and cost of maintenance.

Dans le mode de réalisation préféré précité relatif à un dispositif d'aide à l'atterrissage de type GLS, l'équipement de radionavigation 2 met en oeuvre une fonction complexe, puisqu'il utilise des données extérieures provenant d'un segment spatial (signaux radiofréquence RF transmis par des satellites GPS, par exemple les satellites S1 et S2) et d'un segment sol (liaison de données VHF transmise par des stations sol GPS différentiel, par exemple les stations sol P1 et P2).In the aforementioned preferred embodiment relating to a GLS landing aid device, the radio navigation equipment 2 implements a complex function, since it uses external data from a space segment (signals RF radiofrequency transmitted by GPS satellites, for example satellites S1 and S2) and a ground segment (VHF data link transmitted by differential GPS ground stations, for example ground stations P1 and P2).

Les signaux RF et les données VHF sont regroupées, sur la figure 1, sous la référence OE désignant de façon générale des ondes électromagnétiques.The RF signals and the VHF data are grouped in FIG. 1 under the reference OE generally denoting electromagnetic waves.

Dans ce cas, lesdits premiers évènements enregistrés représentent les situations, pour lesquelles les données extérieures reçues par ledit dispositif 2 d'aide à l'atterrissage ne permettent pas de fournir une indication de position correcte de l'aéronef A.In this case, said first recorded events represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device 2 do not make it possible to provide an indication of the correct position of the aircraft A.

Ces premiers évènements sont, notamment, les suivants :

  • nombre de satellites "GPS" S1 et S2 (desquels l'équipement de radionavigation 2 reçoit des données) insuffisant pour calculer une position de l'aéronef A :
    • ■ niveau des signaux radiofréquence (reçus d'un satellite S1, S2) inférieur à une valeur en deçà de laquelle l'équipement de radionavigation 2 ne peut pas exploiter lesdits signaux ;
    • ■ anomalies dans les messages de navigation transmis par un satellite S1, S2 ;
    • ■ satellite S1, S2 exclu par une station sol P1, P2 (lorsque la station sol P1, P2 détermine que les données reçues de ce satellite S1, S2 ne sont pas fiables) ;
    • ■ corrections fournies par une station sol P1, P2 trop anciennes pour un satellite S1, S2 ;
  • informations relatives à une station sol P1, P2 :
    • ■ station sol P1, P2 non opérationnelle (station en maintenance, invalidation de l'approche) ;
    • ■ problème d'intégrité des données fournies par la station sol P1, P2 ;
  • perte du signal reçu d'une station sol P1, P2 (niveau du signal reçu inférieur à une valeur prédéterminée ou anomalie radiofréquence) ;
  • erreur de transmission du signal reçu d'une station sol (P1, P2) ; et
  • perte des niveaux de protection : l'équipement GLS calcule une "sphère de confiance" autour de la position GLS calculée. Si le rayon de cette sphère de confiance dépasse un seuil (appelé "alarme limite"), les informations fournies par l'équipement GLS à des systèmes 5 de l'aéronef A sont invalidées. La valeur de ce seuil peut être envoyée à l'aéronef A par une station sol P1, P2. Elle peut également être une valeur prédéterminée.
These first events are, in particular, the following:
  • number of "GPS" satellites S1 and S2 (from which the radionavigation equipment 2 receives data) insufficient to calculate a position of the aircraft A:
    • ■ level of radiofrequency signals (received from a satellite S1, S2) less than a value below which the radionavigation equipment 2 can not operate said signals;
    • ■ anomalies in the navigation messages transmitted by a satellite S1, S2;
    • ■ satellite S1, S2 excluded by a ground station P1, P2 (when the ground station P1, P2 determines that the data received from this satellite S1, S2 are unreliable);
    • ■ corrections provided by a ground station P1, P2 too old for a satellite S1, S2;
  • information relating to a ground station P1, P2:
    • ■ ground station P1, P2 not operational (station in maintenance, invalidation of the approach);
    • ■ data integrity issue provided by ground station P1, P2;
  • loss of the signal received from a ground station P1, P2 (received signal level less than a predetermined value or radiofrequency anomaly);
  • transmission error of the signal received from a ground station (P1, P2); and
  • loss of protection levels: the GLS device calculates a "confidence sphere" around the calculated GLS position. If the radius of this sphere of confidence exceeds a threshold (called "limit alarm"), the information provided by the GLS equipment to systems 5 of the aircraft A are invalidated. The value of this threshold can be sent to the aircraft A by a ground station P1, P2. It can also be a predetermined value.

Claims (10)

  1. A maintenance process for a radionavigation installation (2) of an aircraft (A), according to which in a step b) second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft (A) are recorded in a second list, as appropriate,
    characterized in that, moreover:
    a) first events relating to data external to the aircraft (A), received by said radionavigation installation (2), are recorded in a first list, as appropriate;
    c) a check is carried out to verify whether said second list comprises at least one second event relating to a malfunction, and:
    c1) if said second list comprises no second event, said radionavigation installation (2) is not disassembled; and
    c2) if said second list comprises at least one second event relating to a malfunction, then all the second events of said second list are analyzed, and:
    α) if none of said second events relates to said radionavigation installation (2), then said radionavigation installation (2) is not disassembled; and
    β) if at least one of said second events relates to said radionavigation installation (2), then all the first events of said first list are analyzed, and:
    β1) if said first events make it possible to prove that the various malfunctions are due to problems relating to said data external to the aircraft (A), then said radionavigation installation (2) is not disassembled;
    β2) otherwise, said radionavigation installation (2) is disassembled.
  2. The process as claimed in claim 1,
    characterized in that said steps a) and b) are implemented during the flight of the aircraft (A) and said step c) is implemented at the end of said flight, after the aircraft (A) has returned to the ground.
  3. The process as claimed in one of claims 1 and 2,
    characterized in that said first events are recorded on a recording medium (8) of said radionavigation installation (2), and wherein said second events are recorded on a recording medium (11) of a system (5) of the aircraft (A), which receives information from said radionavigation installation (2).
  4. The process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims,
    characterized in that said radionavigation installation (2) is a landing aid device of the aircraft (A) combined with a positioning system (6) based on satellites (S1, S2) and wherein said first events recorded represent the situations for which the external data received by said landing aid device (2) do not make it possible to supply a correct position indication of the aircraft (A).
  5. The process as claimed in claim 4,
    characterized in that said first events represent at least the following situations:
    - the number of satellites (S1, S2), from which the radionavigation installation (2) receives data, is insufficient to compute a position of the aircraft (A);
    - the level of the radiofrequency signals received by said radionavigation installation (2) is below a predetermined value;
    - anomalies exist in navigation messages transmitted by a satellite (S1, S2) of said positioning system (6) ;
    - a satellite (S1, S2) of said positioning system (6) is excluded by a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6);
    - corrections supplied by a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6) are too old for a satellite (S1, S2) of said positioning system (6);
    - a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6) is not operational;
    - there exists a problem with the integrity of data supplied by a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6);
    - there exists a loss of a signal received from a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6) ;
    - there exists an error of transmission of a signal received from a ground station (P1, P2) of said positioning system (6); and
    - there exists a loss of a predetermined level of protection.
  6. A maintenance device for a radionavigation installation (2) of an aircraft (A), said device including:
    - a second means of recording (10) for recording on a second recording medium (11) second events relating to malfunctions occurring on board the aircraft (A); and
    - a central unit (13) for making it possible to analyze recorded events so as to aid to determine whether said radionavigation installation (2) should or should not be disassembled,
    characterized in that it moreover comprises a first means of recording (7) for recording on a first recording medium (8) first events relating to data external to the aircraft (A), received by said radionavigation installation (2), and in that said central unit (13) is formed to receive said first and second events recorded in said first and second recording media (8,11) and to make it possible to analyze said first and second events so as to aid to determine whether said radionavigation installation (2) should or should not be disassembled.
  7. The device as claimed in claim 6,
    characterized in that said first means of recording (8) is a means of recording of said radionavigation installation (2).
  8. The device as claimed in one of claims 6 and 7,
    characterized in that said second means of recording (11) is a means of recording of a system (5) of the aircraft (A), which receives information from said radionavigation installation (2).
  9. An aircraft,
    characterized in that it comprises a device (1) such as that as specified under any one of claims 6 to 8.
  10. An aircraft,
    characterized in that it comprises a device (1) able to implement the process specified under any one of claims 1 to 5.
EP04291980A 2003-09-05 2004-08-03 Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft Expired - Lifetime EP1512628B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0310497 2003-09-05
FR0310497A FR2859556B1 (en) 2003-09-05 2003-09-05 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE OF A RADIONAVIGATION EQUIPMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1512628A1 EP1512628A1 (en) 2005-03-09
EP1512628B1 true EP1512628B1 (en) 2006-09-27

Family

ID=34130754

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04291980A Expired - Lifetime EP1512628B1 (en) 2003-09-05 2004-08-03 Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US7519456B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1512628B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE340736T1 (en)
CA (1) CA2478779C (en)
DE (1) DE602004002535T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2271806T3 (en)
FR (1) FR2859556B1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2859556B1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2005-11-11 Airbus France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE OF A RADIONAVIGATION EQUIPMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT
FR2914803B1 (en) * 2007-04-06 2009-09-18 Airbus Sas METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE IN AN AIRCRAFT
FR2925595B1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2014-06-13 Snecma Services METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CHARACTERIZING AND COUNTING A THRESHOLD EXCEEDS BY AN OPERATING PARAMETER OF AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4729102A (en) * 1984-10-24 1988-03-01 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Aircraft data acquisition and recording system
US4943919A (en) * 1988-10-17 1990-07-24 The Boeing Company Central maintenance computer system and fault data handling method
US5216611A (en) * 1991-02-08 1993-06-01 Rockwell International Corporation Integrated enroute and approach guidance system for aircraft
CA2072169A1 (en) * 1991-06-24 1992-12-25 Lih-Juan L. Danielson In-band/out-of-band alert delivery system
US5561686A (en) * 1991-08-23 1996-10-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Radio information communication system using multi-carrier spread spectrum transmission system
US5957995A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-09-28 Trimble Navigation Radio navigation emulating GPS system
US5890079A (en) * 1996-12-17 1999-03-30 Levine; Seymour Remote aircraft flight recorder and advisory system
US6324592B1 (en) * 1997-02-25 2001-11-27 Keystone Aerospace Apparatus and method for a mobile computer architecture and input/output management system
US6115656A (en) * 1997-06-17 2000-09-05 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Fault recording and reporting method
US6115654A (en) * 1997-12-23 2000-09-05 Simmonds Precision Products, Inc. Universal sensor interface system and method
US6313786B1 (en) * 1998-07-02 2001-11-06 Snaptrack, Inc. Method and apparatus for measurement processing of satellite positioning system (SPS) signals
DE19839193A1 (en) * 1998-08-28 2000-03-02 Bosch Gmbh Robert Device for controlling and monitoring a vehicle
WO2001001366A2 (en) * 1999-06-25 2001-01-04 Telemonitor, Inc. Smart remote monitoring system and method
DE10007218B4 (en) * 2000-02-17 2009-11-26 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for event interpretation and issuing of operating instructions in motor vehicles
US6598179B1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2003-07-22 International Business Machines Corporation Table-based error log analysis
SE518104C2 (en) * 2000-06-13 2002-08-27 Saab Ab Software maintenance system and method
US6693558B2 (en) * 2001-06-18 2004-02-17 Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. Aircraft flat panel display system
DE10153151A1 (en) * 2001-10-27 2003-05-15 Airbus Gmbh Diagnostic system and diagnostic procedures to support aircraft maintenance
FR2859556B1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2005-11-11 Airbus France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAINTENANCE OF A RADIONAVIGATION EQUIPMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT
US7149612B2 (en) * 2004-01-05 2006-12-12 Arinc Incorporated System and method for monitoring and reporting aircraft quick access recorder data
FR2875901B1 (en) * 2004-09-28 2006-12-08 Eurocopter France ONBOARD SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTING AN AIR ROAD

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2478779A1 (en) 2005-03-05
ATE340736T1 (en) 2006-10-15
DE602004002535T2 (en) 2007-09-06
DE602004002535D1 (en) 2006-11-09
US20060293803A1 (en) 2006-12-28
CA2478779C (en) 2014-06-03
FR2859556B1 (en) 2005-11-11
FR2859556A1 (en) 2005-03-11
US7519456B2 (en) 2009-04-14
ES2271806T3 (en) 2007-04-16
EP1512628A1 (en) 2005-03-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2693232B1 (en) Method for monitoring the integrity of radio-navigation stations in a satellite augmentation system
JP3281015B2 (en) Aircraft position monitoring system
EP1989510B1 (en) Hybrid positioning method and device
EP0780746B1 (en) Monitoring system for a complex system, especially for an aircraft
EP1992958B1 (en) Method and system for satellite positioning
FR3030057A1 (en) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VALIDATION OF SATELLITE GEOLOCATION
FR3010542A1 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTOMATICALLY MONITORING A FLIGHT TRACK OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE OPERATION REQUIRED.
EP2386875A1 (en) Verteiltes Entfernungsmesssystem für die Lokalisierung eines geostationären Satelliten
WO2007010116A1 (en) Method and device for determining the ground position of a mobile object, in particular an aircraft on an airport
WO2005086113A1 (en) Automatic method for transmitting monitoring alarms from an aircraft to the ground
EP1083442A1 (en) Method and apparatus for motor vehicle radar alignment
EP2998765A1 (en) System for excluding a failure of a satellite in a gnss system
EP1460504A1 (en) System for piloting an aircraft, at least for piloting the aircraft during a non precision approach to landing
EP2765390B1 (en) System and method for assisting with the navigation of an aircraft
EP1512628B1 (en) Method and system for maintenance of radionavigation equipment of an aircraft
EP1577644A1 (en) Method for real-time guidance of a terrestrial vehicle equipped with an off-board navigation system
CA2615749A1 (en) Device for assisting ground navigation of an aircraft on an airport
FR3054394B1 (en) DEVICE FOR TRANSFERRING INFORMATION FROM AN AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FROM AN AIRCRAFT TO AN INDEPENDENT COMPUTER
FR3066612A1 (en) SYSTEM FOR INCREASING A SATELLITE POSITIONING SYSTEM AND AUTONOMOUS INTEGRATED AUTONOMOUS MONITORING RECEIVER
FR2823857A1 (en) METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF A TRANSMITTER BEACON
EP0899578B1 (en) Method of localising the position of a fixed terminal employing a constellation of satellites
FR2966252A1 (en) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INCREASING THE AVAILABILITY OF A SATELLITE GEOLOCATION SYSTEM
FR2922641A1 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECALING THE POSITION OF AN AIRCRAFT.
EP3106896B1 (en) Space based or aeronautical augmentation system with simplified management of its navigation messages
FR2934364A1 (en) Embarked satellite navigation system initializing method for airplane, involves receiving complementary data signal emitted by ground base, by satellite navigation system to determine aircraft position in combination with satellite signal

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL HR LT LV MK

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050407

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20060927

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602004002535

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20061109

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061227

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2271806

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070628

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE

Effective date: 20070831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061228

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070831

PGRI Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Effective date: 20081001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070803

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070328

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060927

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20090813

Year of fee payment: 6

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20110721 AND 20110727

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CJ

Effective date: 20110916

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: AIRBUS HOLDING, FR

Effective date: 20110916

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20110916

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: AIRBUS HOLDING, FR

Effective date: 20110913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS

Effective date: 20120308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602004002535

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602004002535

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS, FR

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: AIRBUS FRANCE, TOULOUSE, FR

Effective date: 20120326

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602004002535

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE

Effective date: 20120326

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602004002535

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: ANWALTSKANZLEI MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE

Effective date: 20120326

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100804

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20130829

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20130830

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140803

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20160104

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190822

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190822

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190821

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602004002535

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200831

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210302

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200803