EP1372856A1 - Device and method for canceling sheet material - Google Patents
Device and method for canceling sheet materialInfo
- Publication number
- EP1372856A1 EP1372856A1 EP02716832A EP02716832A EP1372856A1 EP 1372856 A1 EP1372856 A1 EP 1372856A1 EP 02716832 A EP02716832 A EP 02716832A EP 02716832 A EP02716832 A EP 02716832A EP 1372856 A1 EP1372856 A1 EP 1372856A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sheet material
- emerging
- light
- fed
- monitoring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 33
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims description 54
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000012806 monitoring device Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002834 transmittance Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000023077 detection of light stimulus Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001454 recorded image Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241001227717 Phyllopertha horticola Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004080 punching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C18/00—Disintegrating by knives or other cutting or tearing members which chop material into fragments
- B02C18/0007—Disintegrating by knives or other cutting or tearing members which chop material into fragments specially adapted for disintegrating documents
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device for the cancellation, in particular destruction, of sheet material, in particular bank notes, with at least one cancellation device, to which the sheet material to be canceled is fed, in which the sheet material fed is canceled, in particular destroyed, and from which the canceled sheet material emerges , and with at least one control device for monitoring the sheet material emerging or emerging from the cancellation device.
- the invention also relates to a corresponding method for the devaluation, in particular destruction, of sheet material.
- Devices and methods of the generic type are used in particular in banknote processing systems in which machine testing, sorting and, if appropriate, destruction of banknotes takes place.
- Banknotes are individually removed from a stack, checked for authenticity and / or condition, in particular dirt, limpness or damage, according to different criteria, assigned to certain sorting classes depending on the result of this check, and finally fed to corresponding output devices via a transport system. Damaged or heavily soiled banknotes that are unusable for further circulation are sent to a corresponding device for destruction.
- European patent EP 0 374481 B1 discloses a bank note processing system in which the cut sheet material leaving a cutting device is sensed directly behind the cutting device, for example with an optical sensor, an ultrasonic sensor or a sensor based on piezoelectric materials. To improve the reliability of the monitoring, the sensor signal signals are correlated with the signal of a light barrier arranged in front of the cutting device.
- the invention is based on the idea of providing at least one monitoring device for monitoring the sheet material fed to the cancellation device.
- the monitored, fed sheet material is compared with the emerging or emerging sheet material in at least one evaluation device. In this comparison, it is checked in particular whether the sheet material detected by the control device and emerging from the cancellation device is identical to the expectations which are derived from the monitoring of the sheet material supplied. For example, a larger amount of escaping, destroyed sheet material is to be expected for a fed sheet with a large area than for a sheet with a smaller area.
- the monitoring device is preferably arranged in a feed area in front of the validation device, in which the z. B. is checked in a banknote processing system and intended for cancellation sheet material of the cancellation device, and is particularly for tracking the position of the feeder located in the feed area and the cancellation device and / or for recording specific properties of the supplied sheets, for. B. print image, denomination, length, width or multiple prints, trained.
- the control device for monitoring the emerging or emerging sheet material is preferably arranged in an exit area after the cancellation device, in which the canceled sheet material exits the cancellation device.
- the supplied sheets can be detected with greater accuracy than is possible with the use of a light barrier in the feed area known from the prior art.
- the comparison of the supplied sheet material monitored in this way with the exiting sheet material therefore allows a more reliable and precise monitoring of the devaluation process.
- interference with the invention such as. B. congestion or multiple deductions can be reconstructed in the feed area easier and much more accurately.
- any kind of devaluation which by appropriate marking of the sheet material, for. B. by stamping, or a partial, z. B. by punching, or complete destruction, e.g. B. by shredding, the sheet material.
- FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the device according to the invention for monitoring the destruction of banknotes
- 3 shows an illustration of a comparison of the supplied banknotes with the banknotes emerging from the cancellation device in the case of an undisturbed bariknot transport
- 4 shows an illustration of a comparison of the supplied banknotes with the banknotes emerging from the cancellation device in the event of a disturbed banknote transport
- FIG. 5 shows a further embodiment of the invention with a monitoring device consisting of several sensor devices
- FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of the invention with a control device with a light curtain
- a banknote 1 to be destroyed is fed in the feed area 3 by means of a transport system consisting of transport belts 13 and transport rollers 15 in the transport direction 14 to a cancellation device 2.
- the cancellation device 2 is a shredder in which the banknotes 1 to be destroyed are chopped up as they pass between rotating knife rollers 12.
- the destroyed sheet material 11 leaves the cancellation device 2 in the exit area 4 in the form of small snippets.
- Image detection devices 6a and 6b are arranged in the feed area 3 as monitoring devices, which each take pictures of the front and back of banknotes 1 transported to the cancellation device 2 in the feed area 3.
- the image capture devices 6a and 6b are preferably designed for the continuous recording of images of the entire transport process taking place in the feed area 3, including the banknotes 1 to be destroyed.
- a first light barrier 8 is arranged in the feed area 3, which generates information about the presence of banknotes 1 in the feed area 3.
- a control device for monitoring the result of the destruction of the banknotes 1 is arranged in the exit area 4.
- the control device can be, for example, an acoustic, optical or piezoelectric sensor or a second image capture device 7, in particular a camera, for capturing images.
- the signals from the sensor or the images of the second image capture device 7 are fed to an evaluation device 9 and evaluated and / or stored there.
- the mass flow or volume flow of the destroyed banknotes 11 emerging from the cancellation device 2 is preferably determined from the sensor signals or images of the control device.
- the percentage degree of destruction and / or the average shredded size of the escaped or emerging shredded bank note 11 can also be determined from the sensor signals and / or the captured images.
- Data of the captured images can be stored in the evaluation device 9 together with the information captured by the first light barrier 8. If necessary, in particular when a fault occurs in the feed area 3 and / or in the exit area 4, the stored data and information can then be compared with one another in that the time course of the stored information of the first light barrier 8 is related to the recorded time course of the captured images is set to each other. This can be done, for example, with the help of a graphical representation of the data and information.
- the type and the course of the present fault can then be determined or reconstructed, either by means of intelligent software in the evaluation device 9 or by analysis by trained operating personnel. In particular, it can be determined with high reliability which of the banknotes 1 to be destroyed have actually passed through the cancellation device 2 and have left them as snippets 11 in the exit area 4.
- FIG. 1 a side view of the course of a bank note 1 shown in the right part of FIG. 1 is shown.
- the bank note 1 is conveyed to the cancellation device 2 in the feed area 3 by means of a transport system, which is only indicated here by the transport belts 13, and is destroyed there.
- the destroyed sheet material 11 leaves the cancellation device 2 in the form of small chopped snippets.
- the dashed lines in the area of the banknote 1 and in the exit area 4 each indicate the approximate position of the first and second image detection devices 6a and 6b and 7, respectively.
- the image capture devices 6a, 6b and 7 are designed as line cameras. This is done sequentially, ie at successive regular time intervals, a line-shaped section of the object passing the camera, here the banknote 1 or snippet 11, was recorded and then combined to form a complete and continuous image sequence, ie to form a film.
- the dashed lines in the area of the bank note 1 or the snippets 11 indicate the approximate position of the cellular section.
- the image capture devices 6a, 6b and 7 can be designed for capturing two-dimensional images with horizontal and vertical expansion.
- the dashed lines indicate the approximate center of the captured image.
- the monitoring device comprises at least one first light barrier 8 instead of the image detection devices 6a and 6b.
- the information generated by the first light barrier 8 about the presence of banknotes 1 in the feed area 3 is combined with the signals or Images of the evaluation device 9 are supplied, where they are stored and compared with one another if necessary.
- this embodiment shows in the right part an embodiment of the invention in which the image capture devices 6a, 6b and 7, in particular cameras, are designed for capturing two-dimensional images.
- this embodiment has the advantage that events of the entire image section 18a, 18b or 19 recorded in each case are recorded. Cameras that are particularly suitable for this have an image frequency of more than about 100 images per second.
- the captured image sections 18a, 18b and 19 are preferably selected so that also the area immediately before and / or after the cancellation device 2 is detected.
- the course of the cancellation process can also be carried out in the event of transport disruptions in the immediate vicinity of the cancellation device 2, e.g. B. due to rolled or delayed banknotes.
- the information generated by the first light barrier 8 is combined with the images of an evaluation device (not shown) acquired by the image capturing devices 6a, 6b and 7, for example, B. a computer system supplied and stored there if necessary.
- the data of the image capture devices 6a, 6b and 7 in Figures 1 and 2 can be permanently with the addition of time information, for. B. clock signals or derived time values are recorded.
- the recording is done e.g. B. by means of video recording on tape or storage on a digital data carrier, such as. B. a hard drive of the computer system.
- the stored time information can then be used to access the data in the immediate vicinity of the fault.
- the data of the image recording devices 6a, 6b or 7 can be recorded together with counter status information.
- the stored count information can then be used to access the data belonging to a given meter reading.
- the meter reading information NEN z. B. by means of a counting device (not shown) which counts the banknotes 1 fed to the cancellation device 2.
- FIG. 2 In the left part of FIG. 2, analogous to the example explained in FIG. 1, a side view of the course of a bank note 1 shown in the right part of FIG. 2 is shown.
- the dashed lines in the area of the supplied and emerging bank notes 1 and 11 respectively indicate the central position of the image sections 18a and 18b and 19 of the first and second image capturing devices 6a and 6b and 7, respectively.
- FIG. 3 shows a comparison of the supplied banknotes 1 with the banknotes 11 emerging from the cancellation device in the case of an undisturbed transport of banknotes.
- the images 22, 23 and 24 of the banknotes 1 and 11 to be destroyed or destroyed by the image detection devices 6a, 6b and 7 are plotted together with the course of the signal 21 of the first light barrier 8 over time t .
- the real time differences between the positions of the banknotes 1 in the area of the first light barrier 8, the first image capturing devices 6a and 6b and the second image capturing devices 7 have been eliminated, so that events belonging to a banknote 1 are each directly below one another.
- the comparison is the comparison. the data and thus the analysis or reconstruction of faults in the entire devaluation process is particularly simple. can be carried out safely and clearly.
- the images 24 of the destroyed banknotes 11 recorded by the camera 7 also correspond to the expected quantity of snippets generated by the cancellation device, since banknotes 1 with a large area, such as e.g. B. the. Banknote with the value 20, resulting in a larger amount of chips in the exit area 4 of the cancellation device 2 than banknotes 1 with a small area, such as, for example, B. the banknote with the value 5 ..
- FIG. 4 shows the comparison of the supplied banknotes 1 with the banknotes 11 emerging from the cancellation device in the event of a faulty banknote transport.
- the banknote with the value 5 was briefly delayed and only then transported along with the banknote with the value 20. It therefore passes together with the latter through the first light barrier 8 and the cameras 6a and 6b in the feed area 3.
- a correspondingly lengthened light barrier signal 21 is therefore detected. From the image capture Devices 6a and 6b recorded images 23 and 22 can then be easily recognized in the event of a malfunction that this relatively long light barrier signal 21 can be explained with two bank notes which partially overlap.
- the denomination, ie the value, of the banknotes involved in the disturbance can be recognized.
- the images 24 captured by the image capture device 7 are used in the exit area 4 of the destruction device 2.
- the amount of snippets 11 detected in the corresponding time range by means of the recorded images 24 corresponds to the banknotes which partially overlap in length, so that both banknotes 1 can be properly destroyed.
- the subsequently processed banknote with the value 10 shows again the devaluation process to be expected for individual banknotes, which has already been explained in more detail in FIG. 3.
- the event could no longer be unequivocally reconstructed from a single evaluation of the light barrier signal 21, in particular if the bank note 1 with the value 5 had been delayed so that it would have been completely covered by the bank note 1 with the value 20. Without the corresponding image data, it would then not be possible to tell whether the banknote 1 with the value 5 had been stopped or removed in front of the first light barrier 8, or whether it had been destroyed together with the banknote 1 with the value 20
- FIG. 5 shows a further embodiment of the invention.
- Banknotes 1 are fed to the validation device 2 along a transport path 17, as in the example in FIG. 1, by means of a transport system comprising transport belts 13 and transport rollers 15.
- a plurality of sensor devices 16 are arranged along the transport path 17 which Detect the position of a banknote 1 to be destroyed on the transport path 17.
- the sensor devices 16 are designed to track the position of the bank notes 1 passing through the transport path 17.
- the sensor devices 16 can be arranged as closely as possible one behind the other in order to obtain a high spatial resolution and to be able to localize the current position of a bank note 1 on the transport path 17 as precisely as possible at any time.
- Transmission sensors with which the light transmittance of the banknotes 1 can be detected are used as sensor devices 16 for tracking the banknotes 1. From the measured light transmission z. For example, it can be determined what type or value of the banknote it is or whether there is a multiple deduction. Alternatively, simple light barriers can also be used as sensor devices 16 in order to detect the position of the front and rear edges of the bank notes 1.
- At least one of the sensor devices 16 can be designed to detect at least one specific property, for example denomination, print image, dimension or multiple deductions, of the sheet material 1.
- a sensor device 16 can be designed as a simple print image detector, which merely checks whether the sheets transported to the cancellation device 2 have a print image or not. In this way, unauthorized infiltration of unprinted blanks can be easily recognized.
- a control device 7 in particular a camera, is provided, with which the ertungs annoying from Dev ⁇ 2 exiting destroyed banknotes 11 detects the advertising.
- the control device 7 and the outputs of the sensor devices 16 are connected to the evaluation unit 9. For reasons of clarity, only the connections of the two outer sensor devices 16 to the evaluation unit 9 have been shown completely. To simplify the connections of the outputs of all other sensor devices 16 to the evaluation device 9 are indicated by a dashed line.
- the supply of banknotes 1 monitored by the sensor devices 16 and the banknotes 11 monitored by the control device 7 are compared in the evaluation device 9.
- the correlation of the signals of the sensor devices 16 with the images of the control device 7 takes place in analogy to the examples described in FIGS. 3 and 4.
- Another evaluation possibility is to compare the area of the original bank note 1 with the number and dimensions of the snippets 11 and thus to check whether the bank note 1 has been completely destroyed. This calculation is carried out approximately by determining the total area of the snippets 11, which is in a proportional relationship to the area of the banknote 1. Taking into account the known thickness of the banknote 1, a volume flow of the clippings 11 can also be determined on this basis.
- control device 7 can detect the mass flow of the snippets 11 at the exit of the cancellation device 2. This measurement can e.g. be carried out on the basis of a measuring device according to the Coriolis principle. By comparing the expected values based on the supplied mass of banknotes 1 and the measured mass flow of snippets 11, it can be checked whether banknotes 1 have been completely destroyed and at the expected time.
- FIG. 6 shows a further embodiment of the invention.
- a first light barrier 8 is provided as a monitoring device, which monitors the supply of the bank note 1 to be canceled to the cancellation device 2, with which the presence of a bank note 1 in the feed area 3 is detected.
- the transport of the bank note 1 and its cancellation in the cancellation device 2 take place in accordance with the exemplary embodiment described in connection with FIG. 1.
- the canceled banknote 11 emerging from the cancellation device 2 is monitored by means of a control device which comprises a second light barrier 28 arranged in the exit area 4 of the cancellation device 2.
- the light from the second light barrier 28 forms a light curtain, which essentially consists of light beams running in one or more planes.
- the banknote 11 emerging from the cancellation device 2 passes through the light curtain of the second light barrier 28, different light barrier signals being generated depending on the result of the cancellation or destruction. These are - preferably together with the light barrier signals of the first light barrier 8 - fed to the evaluation device 9 for storage and / or evaluation.
- FIG. 7a shows the basic structure and the mode of operation of the second light barrier 28 shown in FIG. 6 in a schematic view in viewing direction B with the banknote 11 not destroyed or destroyed (left or right part of the picture).
- the light barrier 28 has a linear light source 30, for example a row of light-emitting diodes which is as homogeneous as possible.
- the light source 30 generates a laser beam fanned out by means of an optical device which, for example, comprises a cylindrical scattering lens.
- the rays of the light 32 emitted by the light source 30 form at least one plane 29, ie a light curtain, and are detected by a linear light receiver 31.
- the light receiver 31 is preferably designed for integral, ie not spatially resolved, detection of the light striking it.
- the light source 30 and the light receiver 31 are preferably attached at one end to a common rod-shaped holder (not shown), so that a U-shaped profile is created. Such light barrier arrangements are therefore also called fork light barriers.
- light source 30 and / or light receiver 31 can be attached directly to the validation device 2 independently of one another.
- the light 32 can have spectral components in the visible and / or invisible spectral range and can be monochromatic or broadband.
- the linear light source 30 or the linear light receiver 31 are arranged such that the light beams 32 run essentially parallel to the plane of an emerging bank note 11. In the example shown, this is achieved in that the light source 30 and the light receiver 31 are aligned perpendicular to the plane of the emerging bank note 11.
- an undissolved banknote 11 moves through the light curtain 29, only a small part of the light rays 32 being reflected or weakened by the banknote 11.
- the snippet cloud of a destroyed banknote 11 moves through the light curtain 29, so that more light rays 32 are reflected or weakened.
- the amount of light detected by the light receiver 31 is correspondingly lower in comparison to, for example, the left part of the image.
- Limit values for the signal reduction of the light barrier signal 28 are preferably specified for evaluation. A simple comparison of the measured signal reduction with the limit value then provides information as to whether the bank note 11 has been properly or only partially or not destroyed. In the latter case, for example, processing can be stopped immediately.
- FIG. 8a shows a modification of the embodiment shown in FIG. 7a.
- the line-shaped light source 30 or the line-shaped light receiver 31 are arranged such that the light beams 32 run essentially perpendicular to the plane of an emerging bank note 11. In this example, this is achieved in that the linear light source 30 and the linear light receiver 31 are aligned essentially parallel to the plane of the emerging bank note 11.
- an undissected bank note 11 passes the light curtain 29.
- a large part of the light rays 32 is reflected by the bank note 11 or at least significantly weakened.
- the snippet cloud of a destroyed banknote 11 passes through the light curtain 29, the light rays 32 being less strongly reflected or weakened in comparison to the non-destroyed banknote 11 (left part of the image). Consequently, the amount of light detected by the light receiver 31 is larger than in the example of the left part of the image. This relationship can be seen from the temporal course of the respective light barrier signals in FIG.
- the signal 35 of the light barrier 28 obtained with the banknote 11 not destroyed shows a greater signal reduction in relation to the time period ⁇ t in which the banknote 11 passes the light barrier 28
- Output signal 34 without a banknote than is the case with signal 36 received from the snippet cloud when banknote 11 is destroyed. In this way, the result of the devaluation process can be concluded from the respectively obtained light barrier signal 35 or 36 of the light barrier 28.
- the light barrier 8 and / or the image capturing devices 6a and 6b takes place analogously to the examples described in connection with FIGS. 3 and 4.
- the use of the light barrier 28 with a light curtain achieves particularly simple and reliable monitoring of the sheet material 11 emerging from the cancellation device 2.
- the light barrier 28 with light curtain described above is also suitable as a monitoring device in the feed area 3 in order to achieve simple and reliable monitoring of the sheet material 1 being fed there as well.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
- Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
- Crushing And Pulverization Processes (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
- Radiography Using Non-Light Waves (AREA)
- Registering, Tensioning, Guiding Webs, And Rollers Therefor (AREA)
- Folding Of Thin Sheet-Like Materials, Special Discharging Devices, And Others (AREA)
- Cash Registers Or Receiving Machines (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10111907A DE10111907A1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2001-03-13 | Device and method for the cancellation of sheet material |
DE10111907 | 2001-03-13 | ||
PCT/EP2002/002661 WO2002072270A1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2002-03-11 | Device and method for canceling sheet material |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1372856A1 true EP1372856A1 (en) | 2004-01-02 |
EP1372856B1 EP1372856B1 (en) | 2005-12-07 |
Family
ID=7677200
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02716832A Expired - Lifetime EP1372856B1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2002-03-11 | Device and method for canceling sheet material |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7661617B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1372856B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100340346C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE311938T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE10111907A1 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1062280A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2298436C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002072270A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10050486A1 (en) * | 2000-10-12 | 2002-04-18 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Device for processing and monitoring production of banknotes with means for recording both banknote identity and associated processing method |
US6978954B2 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2005-12-27 | Fellowes, Inc. | Detector for a shredder |
NL1023224C2 (en) * | 2003-04-18 | 2004-10-19 | Syntech Holdings Bv | Equipment and method are for secure disintegration of banknotes and involve electronic data simply available to an authorized person for use |
US8672247B2 (en) * | 2005-07-11 | 2014-03-18 | Fellowes, Inc. | Shredder with thickness detector |
JP2007206879A (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-16 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Disposal device, disposal system, and disposal method |
JP4984554B2 (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2012-07-25 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Disposal processing device, disposal processing information management system, and disposal processing method |
JP2007206822A (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-16 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Document management system, document disposal management system, document management method, and document disposal management method |
DE102006036136A1 (en) * | 2006-07-28 | 2008-01-31 | Martin Yale International Gmbh | Paper shredder i.e. document annihilator, for cutting e.g. paper, has thickness measuring device arranged in area of inlet for measuring thickness of flat material and designed in contactless working manner as capacitive measuring device |
DE102006042186A1 (en) * | 2006-09-08 | 2008-03-27 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Procedure for the destruction of banknotes |
US10115259B2 (en) * | 2012-06-15 | 2018-10-30 | Ncr Corporation | Item validation |
JP2015095154A (en) * | 2013-11-13 | 2015-05-18 | 株式会社東芝 | Paper processing apparatus |
CN106216038B (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2018-05-15 | 福建巨昂电子科技有限公司 | One kind sensing paper cutter |
EP3413014B1 (en) * | 2017-06-08 | 2023-07-19 | Stephan Brauss | Device and method for detecting and measuring objects |
DE102017121248B4 (en) * | 2017-09-13 | 2024-11-28 | Leitz Acco Brands Gmbh & Co Kg | document shredder |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US661910A (en) * | 1900-09-27 | 1900-11-13 | Frederic Lionel Graham | Nib-ejecting penholder. |
SU389399A1 (en) | 1971-08-05 | 1973-07-05 | Филиал ордена Ленина физико технического института А. Ф. Иоффе | LINEAR DISPLACEMENT SENSOR |
GB8722063D0 (en) | 1987-09-18 | 1987-10-28 | De La Rue Syst | Shredding sheets |
US4991008A (en) * | 1988-12-01 | 1991-02-05 | Intec Video Systems, Inc. | Automatic transaction surveillance system |
DE3843602A1 (en) * | 1988-12-23 | 1990-07-05 | Gao Ges Automation Org | PROCEDURE OR DEVICE FOR AUTOMATICALLY MONITORING THE DESTRUCTION OF THIN LEAF |
JPH0568907A (en) | 1991-03-13 | 1993-03-23 | Riso Kagaku Corp | Paper sheet data disposal treatment apparatus |
JPH0583499A (en) | 1991-03-13 | 1993-04-02 | Riso Kagaku Corp | Paper sheet information scrapping/processing device |
FR2681429B1 (en) * | 1991-09-13 | 1995-05-24 | Thomson Csf | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR INSPECTING GLASS. |
US5430664A (en) | 1992-07-14 | 1995-07-04 | Technitrol, Inc. | Document counting and batching apparatus with counterfeit detection |
DE9401074U1 (en) * | 1994-01-22 | 1995-06-14 | Eba Maschinenfabrik Adolf Ehinger GmbH, 72336 Balingen | Document shredder with a control |
DE4413079A1 (en) * | 1994-04-15 | 1995-10-19 | Schleicher & Co Int | Switching device for switching a cutting mechanism drive of a shredding document shredder |
US6661910B2 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2003-12-09 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Network for transporting and processing images in real time |
US6198537B1 (en) | 1997-07-11 | 2001-03-06 | Philip Morris Incorporated | Optical inspection system for the manufacture of banded cigarette paper |
US6351552B1 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2002-02-26 | Recot, Inc. | Predestruction note image audit |
DE102005055682A1 (en) * | 2005-11-22 | 2007-05-24 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Banknote `s authenticity testing device for e.g. banknote processing machine, has control device analyzing sensor arrangement data, where design and operation of arrangement and device enables complicated interference at marking substance |
-
2001
- 2001-03-13 DE DE10111907A patent/DE10111907A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2002
- 2002-03-11 US US10/471,622 patent/US7661617B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-11 AT AT02716832T patent/ATE311938T1/en active
- 2002-03-11 DE DE50205192T patent/DE50205192D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-11 CN CNB028062922A patent/CN100340346C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-11 RU RU2003129067/03A patent/RU2298436C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-03-11 WO PCT/EP2002/002661 patent/WO2002072270A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-03-11 EP EP02716832A patent/EP1372856B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-07-20 HK HK04105300A patent/HK1062280A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2010
- 2010-01-15 US US12/688,388 patent/US8002210B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO02072270A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1372856B1 (en) | 2005-12-07 |
RU2003129067A (en) | 2005-04-10 |
US7661617B2 (en) | 2010-02-16 |
HK1062280A1 (en) | 2004-10-29 |
DE50205192D1 (en) | 2006-01-12 |
CN100340346C (en) | 2007-10-03 |
RU2298436C2 (en) | 2007-05-10 |
CN1496283A (en) | 2004-05-12 |
ATE311938T1 (en) | 2005-12-15 |
US8002210B2 (en) | 2011-08-23 |
US20100116918A1 (en) | 2010-05-13 |
DE10111907A1 (en) | 2002-10-31 |
WO2002072270A1 (en) | 2002-09-19 |
US20040112998A1 (en) | 2004-06-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE3587836T2 (en) | Method and device for validating means of payment. | |
EP0374481B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for automatically monitoring the destruction of thin sheets | |
DE2824849C2 (en) | Method and device for determining the condition and / or the authenticity of sheet material | |
DE2446280C3 (en) | Sorting device for thin sheet material | |
EP1372856B1 (en) | Device and method for canceling sheet material | |
EP1810251B1 (en) | Method and device for processing banknotes | |
DE3417218A1 (en) | DOCUMENT EVALUATION DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR BANKNOTE TEST DEVICE | |
EP2619735B1 (en) | Method for monitoring the transport of bank notes | |
WO2004055740A2 (en) | Method and device for the checking of banknotes | |
EP2229329A1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring the separation of sheet product | |
DE102010004580A1 (en) | Device e.g. recycling automated teller machine, for handling value notes, has sensor for determining non-transportation of value notes along transportation path and activating propulsion of two transport elements | |
EP2765559A1 (en) | Coin sorting apparatus | |
EP1953685B1 (en) | Device for counting printing products in a layer transport flow | |
EP1927086B1 (en) | Method and device for testing valuable documents | |
EP2393065A2 (en) | Method and device for checking whether a surface of an object includes a valuable document | |
DE10137390B4 (en) | Method and device for the separation of sheet material | |
DE102010055700A1 (en) | Device for measuring length of sheet material e.g. banknote, has evaluation device that is adapted to evaluate the sensed signal output by line sensor | |
EP4295333B1 (en) | Sensor for verifying the luminescence of value documents | |
EP3134878B1 (en) | Method of checking a value document | |
EP4295332B1 (en) | Sensor for verifying value documents | |
DE102020114980B4 (en) | DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR INSPECTING AT LEAST ONE DIFFACTIVE OPTICAL ELEMENT OF A DOCUMENT | |
DE102010033993A1 (en) | Device for monitoring transportation of banknote along transportation path in banknote processing machine, has control device determining item presence if transducer does not detect ultrasound or detected ultrasound comprises smaller time | |
WO2018086738A1 (en) | Device and method for classifying value documents, in particular bank notes, and value document processing system | |
DE102005008747A1 (en) | Bank note collecting method, involves monitoring entire width of transportation system that is provided for transportation of bank note at one of positions for determination of front and back edges of bank note | |
EP2783354B1 (en) | Method for monitoring transport processes for conveying banknotes in a self-service terminal |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20031013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20041029 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20051207 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051207 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051207 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051207 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL & PARTNER AG Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20051207 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50205192 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20060112 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060307 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060307 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060307 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060318 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060331 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060331 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060508 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060908 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20060331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070126 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051207 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051207 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051207 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20130318 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20140324 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 50205192 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 311938 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140311 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 50205192 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GMBH, 81677 MUENCHEN, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20180118 AND 20180124 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20200331 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20210324 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 50205192 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20220310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20220310 |