EP1264292B1

EP1264292B1 - Pet resistant pir detector

Info

Publication number: EP1264292B1
Application number: EP01914858A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Steven Lee
Original assignee: Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd
Current assignee: Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd
Priority date: 2000-03-10
Filing date: 2001-03-08
Publication date: 2009-11-11
Anticipated expiration: 2021-03-08
Also published as: DE60140432D1; CA2300644C; EP1264292A1; WO2001067414A1; AU4212901A; BR0109092A; BRPI0109092B1; AU2001242129B2; CA2300644A1

Abstract

A passive infrared sensor uses a modified lens or mirror to vertically elongate the detection zones in regions close to the sensor. This vertical elongation reduces the signal produced by a small pet, such as a cat, while the greater height of a human intruder produces a larger signal. The sensor advantageously uses a single detector and the same algorithm is used to distinguish human intruders from small pets.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present application relates to passive infrared motion detection sensors and in particular, relates to a sensor which has improved features with respect to false alarms caused by small pets.
Passive infrared detectors focus radiation from an area to be monitored in a particular manner such that movement of a human intruder through the monitored space is detected. A Fresnel focussing arrangement (lens or mirror) focuses infrared radiation emitted by a human or pet target onto a passive infrared detector. To improve the response characteristics of the sensor, the Fresnel lens has multiple lensets and each lenset includes a focussing element defining an infrared beam that collectively covers the protected area. These beams increase in size as an increasing function of proportional to the distance from the detector. This characteristic of the Fresnel lens makes it difficult to distinguish between small pets located in a region close to the detector from a human target located at a substantial distance from the detector. In the closer region to the detector, the beams are quite small, and as such, a small pet will produce a signal similar in level to a person a substantial distance away from the detector.
As can be appreciated, small pets and in particular, cats, have substantial vertical mobility and are not confined to an area adjacent the floor. Some systems have attempted to design a dead or reduced bottom zone in the region close to the sensor in order to reduce problems associated with false alarms, caused by pets. The substantial vertical mobility of cats defeats this type of system.
United States Patent 4,849,635 discloses a single passive infrared detector sensor where substantial gaps are provided between the sensing beams or zones. These zones are spaced such that a small pet must enter a dead zone as they move across the space. In contrast, a human target is much larger and taller and will therefore, produce a signal regardless whether he is standing at a position which at floor lever, is in the dead zone. With this arrangement, a pet produces a pulse signal with a very low component when the pet is in the dead zone, whereas a human target, although producing a pulsed signal, the signal is much more constant and can be easily distinguished from a pet. Unfortunately, with this system, a cat located at a high point in close proximity to the sensor will bridge two active zones much in the manner of a human.
It has also been known to use two different types of sensors to help distinuguish between a human intruder and a pet. In particular, a microwave sensor in combination with a passive infrared sensor has been used. This type of dual technology sensor greatly increases the cost of the system and as such, is not particularly desirable. It has also been proposed to use a two element passive infrared detector and analyze the signal from the two detectors to distinguish between an intruder and a pet. Typically one element receives low radiation and one detector receives high radiation. A small pet does not have the height to trigger both detectors. This system again experiences some difficulties and also has the additional cost of the two element detection.
EP 0209385 A3 discloses a passive infra-red sensor which includes a window in a housing which also houses an infra-red detector. The window defines a plurality of infra-red transmitting strips which are separated by Fresnel lens segments or infra-red opaque strips. The infra-red transmitting strips provide short range sensitivity. The Fresnel lens segments, where provided, give longer range sensitivity.
EP 0361224 A1 discloses an infra-red detector for monitoring a corridor like room. The detector has a plurality of focusing means for the collection of infra-red radiation emitted by an intruder. The field of view of each focusing means is oriented so as to form a continuous field of coverage in the space to be monitored, without gaps or areas of limited sensitivity. Furthermore, the solid angle sub-tended by each focusing means is chosen so that the sum of the energy received from the intruder in the monitored area and focused onto the infra-red sensor by the multiple focusing means is insensitive to and independent of the range of the intruder from the monitoring device.
A better approach for distinguishing between small pets and human intruders is needed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A passive infrared motion sensor for a security system according to the present invention comprises a passive infrared detector, a focussing arrangement in front of the detector for segmented focussing of infrared radiation from an area to be monitored onto the detector, a processing circuitry for analysing the signal from the detector and making a determination whether or not an intruder is present, the focussing arrangement being divided into at least two horizontal tiers comprising a distant tier and a close tier wherein the close tier has a series of horizontally-spaced focussing facets, and wherein each focussing facet has a detection region, and each facet is vertically segmented for vertically elongating and shaping the detection region to allow the processing circuitry to distinguish in the same manner between an intruder and a small pet throughout the area to be monitored.
The focussing arrangement may be a Fresnel focussing arrangement which may be divided into at least two tiers comprising a first tier and a second tier. The first tier focusses radiation from a distant subdivision of the area being monitored and the second tier focusses radiation from a close subdivision of the area being monitored.
The second tier may divide the close subdivision into narrow elongated vertically disposed sensing strips such that a pet in the close subdivision causes the detector to produce a signal less than 80% of the signal used to indicate the presence of an intruder in the close subdivision or the distant subdivision.
The Fresnel focussing arrangement can either be a mirror arrangement or a lens arrangement. Preferrably, a Fresnel lens is used, comprising a number of stacked lensets of a Fresnel lens with the result being an elongation of the area which is capable of receiving radiation focussing the same on the detector. Basically, the lensets stacked one on top of the other, provides a series of vertical focal points in contrast to the prior practice of a single focal point. With this arrangement, what was previously a very small responsive area in close proximity to the sensor has now been elongated or shaped, whereby the radiation from a pet in close proximity is in proportion to the radiation received from a human intruder at a substantial distance from the sensor (i.e., it is substantially smaller in magnitude).
The size of the active area may be elongated and in most cases, narrowed. With this arrangement, a small pet tends to traverse across this area while an intruder still has substantial vertical height, and as such, will trip the system. Thus, the system enlarges the sensing area and decreases the response caused by a small pet.
The Fresnel focussing arrangement may be divided into at least three horizontal tiers comprising an upper distant tier, an intermediate tier and a close tier, with each tier having a series of horizontally spaced focussing facets. Each focussing facet of the close and the intermediate tiers are segmented to vertically elongate and shape a detection region of the facet such that the passive infrared radiation received due to small pet in the detection region is easily distinguished from passive infrared radiation received due to an intruder in the detection region.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawings, wherein:

Figure 1 is a schematic of the passive infrared motion sensor;
Figure 2 is a schematic showing the sensing conditions of a conventional passive infrared sensor;
Figure 3 is a schematic illustrating vertical elongation of the sensing regions being used within a close and intermediate zone;
Figure 4 shows a Fresnel lens arrangement divided into a series of zones and showing the location of the various focal points;
Figure 5 shows a Fresnel lens similar to the lens of Figure 4, however, showing the actual shape of the lens;
Figure 6 illustrates the formation of a segmented facet portions of a Fresnel lens are produced;
Figure 7 illustrates the formation of a modified facet of the Fresnel lens; and
Figure 8 shows the typical signal produced by a human target in the monitored space and by a animal target in a monitored space.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The passive infrared motion sensor 2 comprises a single element detector 4, a Fresnel focussing arrangement 6, and in this case a lens which focusses the infrared radiation 20 from the space being monitored 22 onto the detector. The signal from the single element detector 4 is fed to the signal conditioning and amplification block 3 with the conditioned signal being provided to the microprocessor 10. The microprocessor 10 determines the strength of the signal received at any point in time and based thereon, determines alarm conditions.
The signal that is generated by a small pet is normally significantly lower in amplitude than a human and can be screened by an appropriate algorithm. Unfortunately, as shown in Figure 2, the Fresnel lens arrangement which are used in prior art passive infrared motion sensors have the characteristic that the size of the active area from which radiation is focussed increases as a function of the separation distance from the detector.
As shown in Figure 2, the distant zone 44 has an active area generally indicated as 26 and this area can be sized to allow the radiation from a human to effectively be recognized by the sensor. A small pet 21 in the active area 26 does not produce a signal of sufficient magnitude to indicate an alarm condition. In the intermediate zone 42 the active area 30 is smaller in size as the distance from the detector has decreased. Once again, the pet does not occupy all of the active area 30 and the active area 30 will cover a large portion of a human intruder, and as such, a pet and a human can be distinguished.
In the close area indicated as 40, the active area has substantially decreased as indicated by 34 and a small pet such as a cat, will be of a height of approximately H2 and effectively covers the area 34. Unfortunately, the signal produced by the pet will be of a magnitude similar to the signal produced by a human in area 26. This close region of the sensor is the area where it has been very difficult to distinguish small pets from human intruders at a long distance. It could also be viewed that the pet and the human, due to the limited size of the region 34 produce a similar signal which would not be the case with respect to active area 30 or active area 26.
Figure 3 shows the results of a modified Fresnel lens arrangement where the active areas of the sensor in a region close to the sensor have been vertically elongated and reduced in width. The vertical elongation 50 shows a number of segments 52 which increase in size vertically. With this vertical shaping of the active zone, the lower most segment 52 again is dominated by a small pet when the pet crosses that zone, however, the magnitude of that signal has been reduced and the amount of radiation received by the detector has been reduced by the extent that the zone has been vertically elongated due to the stack of the focussing segments 52. Thus it can be seen that a human intruder, relative to the active zone 60 will produce a signal that is very similar to an intruder passing through the active zone 50 as he approaches the detector. Similarly the signal from the pet in zone 50 will be in proportion and will certainly not exceed the signal produced by a human at 60. This vertical elongation of the active zones close to the sensor is particularly advantageous as the single element detector 4 can be used and a small pet easily distinguished.
This vertical elongation of the active zones close to the sensor can be partially explained with respect to Figure 4. The Fresnel lens arrangement has been divided into four divisions, namely; tier 1 - 60, tier 2 - 62, tier 3 - 64 and the upper region 66. Upper region 66 is a typical Fresnel lens arrangement for monitoring a distant region from the detector. Tiers 1, 2 and 3 are for the area closer to the sensor.
Tier 1 shows the vertical stacked focal points 67 of each lens sublet and in this case, five stacks of focal points 67 are shown. The second tier - 62, again has a modified series of lensets having focal points 69 which are again vertically stacked. These focal points 69 are offset relative to the focal points 67 and cooperate with tier 1 to define the close region. They require a second tier due to the different structures of tier 1 and 2 which will be explained with reference to Figures 6 through 8. Tier 3 also has a series of stacked focal points 71 and these are used for the intermediate region. As previously mentioned, the region 66 is for the distant region and is of a conventional design.
Figure 5 shows a Fresnel lens arrangement divided into regions 61, 63 and 65. Region 61 is produced by slicing of a Fresnel lens facet as shown in Figure 7. The facet B of Figure 7 is essentially vertically sliced as shown in the intermediate drawing. It is then vertically displaced as shown by fact B' of Figure 7. This vertical displacement stack of focal points 67 shown in Figure 4. This approach vertically elongates the active zone and thus shapes the reactive zone in the desired manner to increase the vertical sensitivity and reduce the signal that a small pet will produce if it crosses this active zone.
Tier 63 of Figure 5 is produced in the manner shown in Figure 6. A central portion of facet A of Figure 6 is removed and similar facets are stacked one above the other to produce the facet A' of Figure 6. This is the general structure of the various segments 63. If the portions are small enough, the resulting stack can approach the barrel type lens of Figure 6. It can also be seen in Figure 5 that the segment 63 has four such stacked segments one above the other and there are different portions horizontally across the Fresnel lens.
With this arrangement, the active area close to the sensor has been vertically elongated and is relatively narrow. By increasing the vertical extent of the active area, the signal produced by a small pet is greatly reduced and thus the sensitivity to small pets is greatly reduced. The vertical elongation assures that the taller human intruder will be sensed, therefore, the vertical elongation in the close zone allows decreasing of the signal caused by a small pet, and allows this reduced signal to be distinguished from an intruder at a substantial distance from the sensor.
With this arrangement, a single element detector can be used and the same algorithm is used by the microprocessor to distinguish between humans and small pets easily distinguishes pets. If a cat happens to climb up onto a couch and moves along the back of the couch in close proximity to the sensor, the small pet will still not occupy all of the segmented active zone due to the substantial vertical elongation and as such, the resulting signal is less than that used to distinguish an intruder.
The focussing arrangement vertical elongates the responsive area. This vertical elongation can be achieved through appropriate lens design or mirror design. The Fresnel lens is one convenient approach to achieve this result. A mirror for focussing of the infrared radiation is a cost effective alternative. The mirror can be segmented or of a continuous design to achieve the desired vertical elongation to allow a small pet and a human intruder to be distinguished.
Some PIR motion detectors utilize mirror optics to focus the infrared energy from the protected area. Normally, the mirror focussing arrangement has better efficiency in focussing compared to the Fresnel lens. A curved mirror acts as a concentrator of energy and also creates beam patterns similar to a Fresnel lens. A given mirror surface can be segmented and each segment rotated by small increments to elongate the beam pattern. Another way of achieving a similar result is to modify the curvature of the mirror to widen the beam pattern. The reflection of incident infrared ray is dependent on the angle of incidence. The curvature of the mirror can be designed to create desirable beam width and length at given distances from the detector.
This elongation or shaping technique is also able to distinguish two pets in close proximity to the sensor. Basically, the signal produced by a small pet such as a cat, is less than about 40% of two cats in close proximity to the sensor will only produce a signal at about 80% of the magnitude necessary to indicate an intruder.
This technique of vertical elongation to distinguish between small pets and intruders is particularly helpful in an area immediately below the detector as well as an intermediate area.
The signal 100 of Figure 8 shows the response 102 due to a human intruder in the close zone and response 104 due to a cat in the close zone. The vertical elongation of the active zones has reduced the signal produced by a small pet.
Many beams are used to generally flood the area with vertical height of each beam being much greater than the height of a small pet.
Although various preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described herein in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, that variations may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

A passive infrared motion sensor (2) for a security system, the sensor comprising a passive infrared detector (4), a focussing arrangement (6) in front of the detector for segmented focussing of infrared radiation from an area to be monitored (22) onto the detector (4), and processing circuitry for analysing the signal from the detector and making a determination whether or not an intruder is present, the focussing arrangement being divided into at least two horizontal tiers comprising a distant tier (66) and a close tier (60, 62), wherein the close tier (60, 62) has a series of horizontally-spaced focussing facets, and wherein each focussing facet has a detection region, and each facet is vertically segmented for vertically elongating and shaping the detection region to allow the processing circuitry to distinguish in the same manner between an intruder and a small pet throughout the area to be monitored (22).
A sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of the tiers (66, 60, 62) includes detection regions which are vertically sized such that a small pet in that region remains distinguishable from an intruder by the processing circuitry.
A sensor as claimed in claim 2, wherein each focussing facet of the close tier (60, 62) has been vertically segmented and shifted to define a stack of focal points defining the detection region.
A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the focussing arrangement is a Fresnel focussing arrangement.
A sensor as claimed in claim 4, wherein the Fresnel focussing arrangement is a Fresnel lens.
A sensor as claimed in any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the focussing arrangement is a mirror arrangement.
A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, the focussing arrangement further comprising an intermediate tier (64), wherein the distant tier (66) and the intermediate tier (64) each have a series of horizontally-spaced focussing facets, each focussing facet of the intermediate tier (64) has a detection region, and each facet of the intermediate tier (64) is vertically segmented for vertically elongating and shaping the detection region to allow the processing circuitry to distinguish in the same manner between an intruder and a small pet throughout the area to be monitored.
A sensor as claimed in claim 7, wherein each focussing facet of the intermediate tier (64) is divided horizontally into discrete focussing segments stacked one above the other.
A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the detection region of each facet is of a narrow width and elongated height.
A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the close tier (60, 62) is arranged such that a small pet in the region associated with the close tier (60, 62) causes the detector to produce a signal less than 80% of the signal used to make the determination that an intruder is present.
A sensor as claimed in claim 10, wherein the close tier (60, 62) is arranged such that a small pet in the region associated with the close tier (60, 62) causes the detector to produce a signal less than 40% of the signal used to make the determination that an intruder is present.
A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the close tier (60, 62) is arranged such that two small pets in the region associated with the close tier will fail to cause the detector to produce a signal indicating the presence of an intruder.