[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0984054B1 - Process and apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes - Google Patents

Process and apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0984054B1
EP0984054B1 EP99117256A EP99117256A EP0984054B1 EP 0984054 B1 EP0984054 B1 EP 0984054B1 EP 99117256 A EP99117256 A EP 99117256A EP 99117256 A EP99117256 A EP 99117256A EP 0984054 B1 EP0984054 B1 EP 0984054B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
stream
free
asphaltenes
hydrogen donor
catalyst
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP99117256A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0984054A3 (en
EP0984054A2 (en
Inventor
Robert J. Friday
Philip B. Rettger
Randall S. Goldstein
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ormat Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Ormat Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/146,534 external-priority patent/US6274003B1/en
Application filed by Ormat Industries Ltd filed Critical Ormat Industries Ltd
Publication of EP0984054A2 publication Critical patent/EP0984054A2/en
Publication of EP0984054A3 publication Critical patent/EP0984054A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0984054B1 publication Critical patent/EP0984054B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G67/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only
    • C10G67/16Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural parallel stages only
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G55/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by at least one refining process and at least one cracking process
    • C10G55/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by at least one refining process and at least one cracking process plural serial stages only
    • C10G55/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by at least one refining process and at least one cracking process plural serial stages only including at least one thermal cracking step

Definitions

  • This invention relates to upgrading and desulfurizing heavy hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes, and more particularly, to a method for upgrading and desulfurizing heavy crude oils or fractions thereof.
  • a conventional approach to removing sulfur compounds in distillable fractions of crude oil, or its derivatives, is catalytic hydrogenation in the presence of molecular hydrogen at moderate pressure and temperature. While this approach is cost effective in removing sulfur from distillable oils, problems arise when the feed includes metallic-containing asphaltenes. Specifically, the presence of metallic-containing asphaltenes results in catalyst deactivation by reason of the coking tendency of the asphaltenes, and the accumulation of metals on the catalyst, especially nickel and vanadium compounds commonly found in the asphaltenes.
  • Asphaltenes contained in heavy oils contaminate and spoil the performance of catalysts in fluidized catalytic cracking units. Asphaltenes present in such oils are converted to high yields of coke and gas which burden an operator with high coke burning requirements. While asphalt markets represent a viable way to dispose of asphaltenes because, normally, no sulfur limits are imposed, such markets are limited in size and location, making this alternative frequently unavailable to a refiner.
  • Another alternative available to a refiner or heavy crude user is to dispose of the non-distillable heavy oil fractions as fuel for industrial power generation or as bunker fuel for ships. Disposal of such fractions as fuel is not particularly profitable to a refiner because more valuable distillate oils must be added in order to reduce viscosity sufficiently to allow handling and shipping, and because the presence of high sulfur and metals contaminants lessens the value to users.
  • Refiners frequently use a thermal conversion process, e.g., visbreaking, for reducing the heavy fuel oil yield. This process converts a limited amount of the heavy oil to lower viscosity light oil, but has the disadvantage of using some of the higher valued distillate oils to reduce the viscosity of the heavy oil sufficiently to allow handling and shipping.
  • the asphaltene content of the heavy oil restricts severely the degree of visbreaking conversion possible due to the tendency of the asphaltenes to condense into heavier materials, even coke, and cause instability in the resulting fuel oil.
  • an asphaltene-containing hydrocarbon feed is solvent deasphalted in a deasphalting zone to produce a deasphalted oil (DAO) fraction, and an asphaltene fraction which is catalytically hydrotreated in a hydrotreating zone to produce a reduced asphaltene stream that is fractionated to produce light distillate fractions and a first heavy distillate fraction.
  • DAO deasphalted oil
  • Both the first heavy distillate fraction and the DAO fraction are thermally cracked into a product stream that is then fractionated into light fractions and a second heavy distillate fraction which is routed to the hydrotreating zone.
  • an asphaltene-containing hydrocarbon feed is solvent deasphalted in a deasphalting zone to produce a deasphalted oil (DAO) fraction, and an asphaltene fraction which is catalytically hydrotreated in a hydrotreating zone to produce a reduced asphaltene stream that is fractionated to produce light distillate fractions and a first heavy distillate fraction.
  • the first heavy distillate fraction is routed to the deasphalting zone for deasphalting, and the DAO fraction is thermally cracked into a product stream that is then fractionated into light fractions and a second heavy distillate fraction which is routed to the hydrotreating zone.
  • the preferred ratio of hydrogen donor diluent to deasphalted oil is about 0.25 to 4 parts of hydrogen donor diluent to 1 part of deasphalted oil.
  • the fractionation of the thermally cracked stream includes fractionating a hydrocarbon feed containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes.
  • the feed to the catalytic hydrotreater is asphaltene-free and metal-free; and as a result only moderate pressures are involved in the hydrotreater thereby reducing the cost of the catalytic hydrotreating equipment.
  • the improved feed to the catalytic hydrotreater will result in much longer catalyst life, thus reducing operating costs.
  • the solvent deasphalting process of the present invention removes both asphaltenes in the initial feed and asphaltenes formed as a by-product of the thermal cracking process.
  • the absence of asphaltenes in the DAO input to the thermal cracker permits its operation under more severe conditions thereby maximizing the generation of distillate products.
  • the severity of a thermal cracking process is limited by the level of asphaltenes present in the thermal cracker because too high a level will result in precipitation of asphaltenes in the thermal cracker which fouls the cracker heaters, or precipitation of asphaltenes from the thermal cracker liquid in subsequent storage or transport.
  • An additional advantage of the present invention lies in using thermal, rather than catalytic, conversion of deasphalted oil. This allows the deasphalting process to be operated such that substantially only asphaltenes, and, therefore, very little deasphalted oil fractions are rejected to the asphaltene phase by the solvent deasphalter even though such operation results in deasphalted oil with a metals and Conradson Carbon level which would be unacceptable if the deasphalted oil were used in a catalytic cracker or catalytic hydrocracker. Since the conversion to distillable fractions occurs thermally, the metals and coke forming fractions do not create a significant cost penalty to the operation.
  • Substantially all of the metals in the feed are ultimately rejected into the asphaltene phase through the recycle of non-distilled, unconverted heavy oil to the solvent deasphalting unit.
  • the inclusion of the hydrogen donor distillate with the deasphalted oil applied to the thermal cracker will suppress or substantially eliminate the coke forming fractions from condensing to form additional asphaltenes, thereby adding to the yield of valuable products.
  • the asphaltenes present in the hydrocarbon to be upgraded are removed in the deasphalting step prior to the thermal cracking step.
  • the non-distilled residual fraction of the thermal cracker products which fraction may contain asphaltenes created as a by-product of the thermal cracking
  • any thermal cracker- produced asphaltenes are removed and the deasphalted non-distilled residual fraction from the thermal cracker can be returned to the thermal cracker for further cracking.
  • the removal of asphaltenes from the initial and the recycled feedstocks upstream of the thermal cracker allows for a much-improved level of conversion of non-distilled hydrocarbon into distillates as compared to the prior art.
  • the asphaltenes produced from the invention can be used as fuel by another fuel user.
  • these asphaltenes can be used as fuel in a fluidized bed combustor or high viscosity fuel oil boiler.
  • the asphaltenes can be used as feedstock to a gasifier, or they can be coked to produce lighter liquid fuels and petroleum coke fuel.
  • the syngas produced from the asphaltenes can be used as a source of hydrogen for the hydrotreater.
  • the distillate fuel produced from the asphaltenes optionally may be hydrotreated and then combined with the distillate products that result from the cracking of the deasphalted oil, and the coke can be sold in the solid fuel markets.
  • the distilled fractions from the process which are asphaltene-free and metal-free and have a reduced sulfur content, can be used without further treatment, as a replacement for premium distillate fuels or refinery feedstocks.
  • reference numeral 10A designates a first embodiment of a process according to the present invention for upgrading hydrocarbon feed 11 which typically contains sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes.
  • Apparatus 10A comprises heater 12 for heating feed 11 and producing heated feed 13 that is applied to distillation column 14 which can be operated at near-atmospheric pressure or, by the use of two separate vessels, at an ultimate pressure that is subatmospheric. Fractionation takes place within column 14 producing gas stream 15, one or more distillate streams shown as combined stream 16 which is a substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free, and non-distilled fraction 18 containing sulfur, asphaltenes, and metals.
  • Gas stream 15 can be used as fuel for process heating.
  • a portion of combined stream 16 may be withdrawn as output stream 37, and the balance of combined stream 16 is converted by means 17 to produce hydrogen donor diluent 17A as described below; and non-distilled, or reduced fraction 18 is applied to solvent deasphalting (SDA) unit 19 for processing the non-distilled fraction and producing deasphalted oil (DAO) stream 20 and asphaltene stream 21.
  • SDA unit 19 is conventional in that it utilizes a recoverable light hydrocarbon such as pentane, or hexane, or a combination thereof, for separating fraction 18 into streams 20 and 21.
  • the concentration of metals in DAO stream 20 produced by SDA unit 19 is substantially lower than the concentration of metals in fraction 18 applied to SDA unit 19.
  • Node 22 serves as means to combine hydrogen donor diluent 17A with deasphalted oil stream 20 to form combined stream 23 which is thermally cracked in a cracking furnace or cracking furnace combined with a soaking drum, shown as thermal cracker 24.
  • deasphalted oil stream 20 is combined with the hydrogen donor stream 17A in the ratio of 0.25 to 4 parts of hydrogen donor to 1 part of deasphalted oil.
  • the heat applied to thermal cracker 24 and the residence time of stream 23 therein serve to thermally crack stream 23 into light hydrocarbon distillable parts. Any asphaltenes formed during the thermal cracking of the non-distillable parts are a part of thermally cracked stream 25.
  • input 26 to distillation column 14 serves as means for applying thermally cracked stream 25 to the column.
  • the distillable parts in stream 25 are separated and recovered as a part of gas stream 15 and combined stream 16.
  • feed 11 can be directed to the solvent deasphalting unit 19 instead of column 14 as shown in the drawing.
  • FIG. 1 shows feeding-back thermally cracked stream 25 directly to column 14, it is also possible to mix stream 25 with feed 11 thereby assisting the heating of the feed in preparation for fractionating in column 14.
  • At least a portion of the distillate produced by column 14, namely stream 16 is catalytically hydrotreated in hydrotreater 27 which also receives gaseous hydrogen via line 28.
  • the hydrotreated product in line 29 is then heated in heater 30 and fractionated in distillation column 31 producing gas stream 32, light distillates 33, middle-range distillates 34, and heavy distillates 35.
  • Gas stream 32 can be used, for example, as fuel for process heating; or, hydrogen in the gas stream can be recovered for use in hydrotreater 27.
  • Stream 29 will also contain a significant amount of hydrogen sulfide from the desulfurization process in the hydrotreater. This hydrogen sulfide can be easily removed from the gas fraction using conventional technology for recovery of the sulfur.
  • a portion of the middle distillate fraction 34 which will have a boiling range of approximately 260°C (500°F) to 482°C (900°F), is used as the hydrogen donor diluent for the thermal cracking process and is recycled as stream 17A.
  • the portion of the middle distillate fraction 34 that is not used as the hydrogen donor is withdrawn from the system as stream 36.
  • Streams 32, 33, 35, 36, and 37 can be combined as an upgraded synthetic crude oil for further processing in a refinery, or used as fuel for power generation without further processing.
  • thermal cracker 24 contains a catalyst. When a catalyst is present, thermal cracking is practiced in the presence of this catalyst.
  • the catalyst can reside in the thermal cracker 24 and/or in the heater 12, but is preferably in the form of an oil dispersible slurry carried by the relevant feed stream.
  • the catalyst preferably promotes cracking of the combined stream 23 .
  • the catalyst suppresses the formation of asphaltenes. In the most preferred embodiment it does both.
  • the catalyst is preferably a metal selected from the group consisting of a Groups IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, and VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements, and mixtures thereof.
  • the most preferred catalyst is molybdenum.
  • the catalyst can be employed in its elemental form or in the form of a compound.
  • thermal cracking which occurs in thermal cracker 24, is practiced in the presence of a hydrogen donor such as hydrogen gas or a hydrogen donor diluent stream.
  • hydrogen gas is supplied to the thermal cracker 24 in order to improve performance.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Description

    1. Technical Field
  • This invention relates to upgrading and desulfurizing heavy hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes, and more particularly, to a method for upgrading and desulfurizing heavy crude oils or fractions thereof.
  • 2. Background of the Invention
  • Many types of heavy crude oils contain high concentrations of sulfur compounds, organo-metallic compounds, and heavy, non-distillable fractions called asphaltenes which are insoluble in light paraffins such as n-pentane. Because most petroleum products used for fuel must have a low sulfur content to comply with environmental restrictions, the presence of sulfur compounds in the non-distillable fractions reduces their value to petroleum refiners and increases their cost to users of such fractions as fuel or as raw material for producing other products. In order to increase the saleability of these non-distillable fractions, refiners must resort to various expedients for removing sulfur compounds.
  • A conventional approach to removing sulfur compounds in distillable fractions of crude oil, or its derivatives, is catalytic hydrogenation in the presence of molecular hydrogen at moderate pressure and temperature. While this approach is cost effective in removing sulfur from distillable oils, problems arise when the feed includes metallic-containing asphaltenes. Specifically, the presence of metallic-containing asphaltenes results in catalyst deactivation by reason of the coking tendency of the asphaltenes, and the accumulation of metals on the catalyst, especially nickel and vanadium compounds commonly found in the asphaltenes.
  • Alternative approaches include coking, high-pressure, desulfurization, and fluidized catalytic cracking of non- distillable oils, and production of asphalt for paving and other uses. All of these processes, however, have disadvantages that are intensified by the presence of high concentrations of metals, sulfur and asphaltenes. In the case of coking non-distillable oils, the cost is high and a disposal market for the resulting high sulfur coke must be found. Furthermore, the products produced from the asphaltene portion of the feed to a coker are almost entirely low valued coke and cracked gases. In the case of residual oil desulfurization, the cost of high-pressure equipment, catalyst consumption, and long processing times make this alternative undesirably expensive.
  • Metals contained in heavy oils contaminate and spoil the performance of catalysts in fluidized catalytic cracking units. Asphaltenes present in such oils are converted to high yields of coke and gas which burden an operator with high coke burning requirements. While asphalt markets represent a viable way to dispose of asphaltenes because, normally, no sulfur limits are imposed, such markets are limited in size and location, making this alternative frequently unavailable to a refiner.
  • Another alternative available to a refiner or heavy crude user is to dispose of the non-distillable heavy oil fractions as fuel for industrial power generation or as bunker fuel for ships. Disposal of such fractions as fuel is not particularly profitable to a refiner because more valuable distillate oils must be added in order to reduce viscosity sufficiently to allow handling and shipping, and because the presence of high sulfur and metals contaminants lessens the value to users. Refiners frequently use a thermal conversion process, e.g., visbreaking, for reducing the heavy fuel oil yield. This process converts a limited amount of the heavy oil to lower viscosity light oil, but has the disadvantage of using some of the higher valued distillate oils to reduce the viscosity of the heavy oil sufficiently to allow handling and shipping. Moreover, the asphaltene content of the heavy oil restricts severely the degree of visbreaking conversion possible due to the tendency of the asphaltenes to condense into heavier materials, even coke, and cause instability in the resulting fuel oil.
  • Many proposals thus have been made for dealing with non-distillable fractions of crude oil containing sulfur and metals. And while many are technically viable, they appear to have achieved little or no commercialization due, in large measure, to the high cost of the technology involved. Usually such cost takes the form of increased catalyst contamination by the metals and/or the carbon deposition resulting from the attempted conversion of the asphaltenes fractions.
  • An example of the processes proposed in order to cope with high metals and asphaltenes is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,500,416 . In one embodiment, an asphaltene-containing hydrocarbon feed is solvent deasphalted in a deasphalting zone to produce a deasphalted oil (DAO) fraction, and an asphaltene fraction which is catalytically hydrotreated in a hydrotreating zone to produce a reduced asphaltene stream that is fractionated to produce light distillate fractions and a first heavy distillate fraction. Both the first heavy distillate fraction and the DAO fraction are thermally cracked into a product stream that is then fractionated into light fractions and a second heavy distillate fraction which is routed to the hydrotreating zone.
  • In an alternative embodiment, an asphaltene-containing hydrocarbon feed is solvent deasphalted in a deasphalting zone to produce a deasphalted oil (DAO) fraction, and an asphaltene fraction which is catalytically hydrotreated in a hydrotreating zone to produce a reduced asphaltene stream that is fractionated to produce light distillate fractions and a first heavy distillate fraction. The first heavy distillate fraction is routed to the deasphalting zone for deasphalting, and the DAO fraction is thermally cracked into a product stream that is then fractionated into light fractions and a second heavy distillate fraction which is routed to the hydrotreating zone.
  • In each embodiment in the document US 4300416 , asphaltenes are routed to a hydrotreating zone wherein heavy metals present in the asphaltenes cause a number of problems. Primarily, the presence of the heavy metals in the hydrotreater cause deactivation of the catalyst which increases the cost of operation. In addition, such heavy metals also result in having to employ higher pressures in the hydrotreater which complicates its design and operation and hence its cost. US 4,640,762 is concerned with increasing the production of distillable materials from bitumens and other heavy oils, and provides a process for converting a feedstock comprising a heavy, high-boiling hydrocarbon oil residuum to produce lower-boiling hydrocarbons, comprising:
    • (a) thermally hydrocracking said feedstock with hydrogen donor diluent in a hydrogen donor diluent cracking zone, producing a hydrocracked product stream,
    • (b) fractionating said hydrocracked product stream into at least one distillable fraction and a hydrocracked residuum fraction,
    • (c) contacting said hydrocracked residuum fraction with an extracting solvent to produce a deasphalted oil fraction and an asphaltenes-rich residue,
    • (d) recycling said deasphalted oil fraction as a recycle stock, and
    • (e) thermally hydrocracking said recycle stock in said hydrogen donor diluent cracking zone together with said first residuum fraction.
    It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method of and apparatus for upgrading and desulfurizing heavy hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes, wherein the disadvantages as outlined are reduced or substantially overcome. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with the present invention, there is proposed a process for upgrading a hydrocarbon feed containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes and producing a substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction, said process characterized by:
    • a) applying said hydrocarbon feed as a first stream directly (13) to a distillation column 14 for fractionating it, said distillation column producing a substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction (16), (37) and a non-distilled fraction (18) containing sulfur, asphaltenes, and metals;
    • b) converting (27), (30), (31) at least some of said substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction (16) to a hydrogen donor diluent (17A);
    • c) processing said non-distilled fraction in a solvent deasphalting unit (19) for producing a deasphalted oil stream (20) and an asphaltene stream (21);
    • d) combining (22) said hydrogen donor diluent (17A) with said deasphalted oil stream (20) to form a combined stream;
    • e) thermal cracking (24) said combined stream for forming a thermally cracked stream (25); and
    • f) applying said thermally cracked stream (25) as a second stream to said distillation column (14) such that said thermally cracked stream (25) feed, which is fed to said distillation column (14) is also fractionated in said distillation column (14).
    wherein converting at least some of said substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction to a hydrogen donor diluent includes:
    b1) catalytically hydrogenating at least a portion of said substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction for forming a hydrotreated stream;
    b2) fractionating said hydrotreated stream for forming substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate, and said hydrogen donor diluent.
  • The preferred ratio of hydrogen donor diluent to deasphalted oil is about 0.25 to 4 parts of hydrogen donor diluent to 1 part of deasphalted oil.
  • The fractionation of the thermally cracked stream includes fractionating a hydrocarbon feed containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes.
  • The presence of hydrogen donor diluent during thermal cracking of the deasphalted oil serves to suppress or substantially eliminate the formation of asphaltenes in the thermal cracker. Moreover, in the preferred form of the invention, the feed to the catalytic hydrotreater is asphaltene-free and metal-free; and as a result only moderate pressures are involved in the hydrotreater thereby reducing the cost of the catalytic hydrotreating equipment. In addition, the improved feed to the catalytic hydrotreater will result in much longer catalyst life, thus reducing operating costs.
  • The solvent deasphalting process of the present invention removes both asphaltenes in the initial feed and asphaltenes formed as a by-product of the thermal cracking process. The absence of asphaltenes in the DAO input to the thermal cracker permits its operation under more severe conditions thereby maximizing the generation of distillate products. As is known, the severity of a thermal cracking process is limited by the level of asphaltenes present in the thermal cracker because too high a level will result in precipitation of asphaltenes in the thermal cracker which fouls the cracker heaters, or precipitation of asphaltenes from the thermal cracker liquid in subsequent storage or transport. Since the presence of asphaltenes sets the limit on conversion in a thermal cracker before excessive coking occurs, removal of asphaltenes from the feed to the thermal cracker allows for higher severity operations and higher conversion rates according to the present invention, and thus lower costs. Moreover, the donor diluent present in the input to the thermal cracker suppresses asphaltene production in the thermal cracker, providing an enhanced yield of light products.
  • An additional advantage of the present invention lies in using thermal, rather than catalytic, conversion of deasphalted oil. This allows the deasphalting process to be operated such that substantially only asphaltenes, and, therefore, very little deasphalted oil fractions are rejected to the asphaltene phase by the solvent deasphalter even though such operation results in deasphalted oil with a metals and Conradson Carbon level which would be unacceptable if the deasphalted oil were used in a catalytic cracker or catalytic hydrocracker. Since the conversion to distillable fractions occurs thermally, the metals and coke forming fractions do not create a significant cost penalty to the operation. Substantially all of the metals in the feed are ultimately rejected into the asphaltene phase through the recycle of non-distilled, unconverted heavy oil to the solvent deasphalting unit. The inclusion of the hydrogen donor distillate with the deasphalted oil applied to the thermal cracker will suppress or substantially eliminate the coke forming fractions from condensing to form additional asphaltenes, thereby adding to the yield of valuable products.
  • According to the present invention, the asphaltenes present in the hydrocarbon to be upgraded are removed in the deasphalting step prior to the thermal cracking step. In addition, by recycling to the solvent deasphalting step the non-distilled residual fraction of the thermal cracker products, which fraction may contain asphaltenes created as a by-product of the thermal cracking, any thermal cracker- produced asphaltenes are removed and the deasphalted non-distilled residual fraction from the thermal cracker can be returned to the thermal cracker for further cracking. Thus, according to the present invention, the removal of asphaltenes from the initial and the recycled feedstocks upstream of the thermal cracker allows for a much-improved level of conversion of non-distilled hydrocarbon into distillates as compared to the prior art.
  • According to the present invention the asphaltenes produced from the invention can be used as fuel by another fuel user. For example, these asphaltenes can be used as fuel in a fluidized bed combustor or high viscosity fuel oil boiler. Alternatively, the asphaltenes can be used as feedstock to a gasifier, or they can be coked to produce lighter liquid fuels and petroleum coke fuel. If gasified, the syngas produced from the asphaltenes can be used as a source of hydrogen for the hydrotreater. If coked, the distillate fuel produced from the asphaltenes optionally may be hydrotreated and then combined with the distillate products that result from the cracking of the deasphalted oil, and the coke can be sold in the solid fuel markets.
  • The distilled fractions from the process, which are asphaltene-free and metal-free and have a reduced sulfur content, can be used without further treatment, as a replacement for premium distillate fuels or refinery feedstocks.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Embodiments of the present invention are described by way of example, and with reference to the accompanying drawing wherein:
    • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the present invention for upgrading a hydrocarbon feed containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes wherein the feed is input to a distillation column; and
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Referring now to the drawings, reference numeral 10A designates a first embodiment of a process according to the present invention for upgrading hydrocarbon feed 11 which typically contains sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes. Apparatus 10A comprises heater 12 for heating feed 11 and producing heated feed 13 that is applied to distillation column 14 which can be operated at near-atmospheric pressure or, by the use of two separate vessels, at an ultimate pressure that is subatmospheric. Fractionation takes place within column 14 producing gas stream 15, one or more distillate streams shown as combined stream 16 which is a substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free, and non-distilled fraction 18 containing sulfur, asphaltenes, and metals.
  • Gas stream 15 can be used as fuel for process heating. A portion of combined stream 16 may be withdrawn as output stream 37, and the balance of combined stream 16 is converted by means 17 to produce hydrogen donor diluent 17A as described below; and non-distilled, or reduced fraction 18 is applied to solvent deasphalting (SDA) unit 19 for processing the non-distilled fraction and producing deasphalted oil (DAO) stream 20 and asphaltene stream 21. SDA unit 19 is conventional in that it utilizes a recoverable light hydrocarbon such as pentane, or hexane, or a combination thereof, for separating fraction 18 into streams 20 and 21. The concentration of metals in DAO stream 20 produced by SDA unit 19 is substantially lower than the concentration of metals in fraction 18 applied to SDA unit 19. In addition, the concentration of metals in asphaltene stream 21 is substantially higher than concentration of metals in DAO stream 20. Node 22 serves as means to combine hydrogen donor diluent 17A with deasphalted oil stream 20 to form combined stream 23 which is thermally cracked in a cracking furnace or cracking furnace combined with a soaking drum, shown as thermal cracker 24. Preferably, deasphalted oil stream 20 is combined with the hydrogen donor stream 17A in the ratio of 0.25 to 4 parts of hydrogen donor to 1 part of deasphalted oil. The heat applied to thermal cracker 24 and the residence time of stream 23 therein serve to thermally crack stream 23 into light hydrocarbon distillable parts. Any asphaltenes formed during the thermal cracking of the non-distillable parts are a part of thermally cracked stream 25.
  • Finally, input 26 to distillation column 14 serves as means for applying thermally cracked stream 25 to the column. Within this column, the distillable parts in stream 25 are separated and recovered as a part of gas stream 15 and combined stream 16. In the event that heavy hydrocarbon feed 11 does not contain a significant amount of distillate, feed 11 can be directed to the solvent deasphalting unit 19 instead of column 14 as shown in the drawing.
  • While Fig. 1 shows feeding-back thermally cracked stream 25 directly to column 14, it is also possible to mix stream 25 with feed 11 thereby assisting the heating of the feed in preparation for fractionating in column 14.
  • Preferably, at least a portion of the distillate produced by column 14, namely stream 16, is catalytically hydrotreated in hydrotreater 27 which also receives gaseous hydrogen via line 28. The hydrotreated product in line 29 is then heated in heater 30 and fractionated in distillation column 31 producing gas stream 32, light distillates 33, middle-range distillates 34, and heavy distillates 35.
  • Gas stream 32 can be used, for example, as fuel for process heating; or, hydrogen in the gas stream can be recovered for use in hydrotreater 27. Stream 29 will also contain a significant amount of hydrogen sulfide from the desulfurization process in the hydrotreater. This hydrogen sulfide can be easily removed from the gas fraction using conventional technology for recovery of the sulfur.
  • A portion of the middle distillate fraction 34, which will have a boiling range of approximately 260°C (500°F) to 482°C (900°F), is used as the hydrogen donor diluent for the thermal cracking process and is recycled as stream 17A. The portion of the middle distillate fraction 34 that is not used as the hydrogen donor is withdrawn from the system as stream 36. Streams 32, 33, 35, 36, and 37 can be combined as an upgraded synthetic crude oil for further processing in a refinery, or used as fuel for power generation without further processing.
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, thermal cracker 24 contains a catalyst. When a catalyst is present, thermal cracking is practiced in the presence of this catalyst. The catalyst can reside in the thermal cracker 24 and/or in the heater 12, but is preferably in the form of an oil dispersible slurry carried by the relevant feed stream.
  • The catalyst preferably promotes cracking of the combined stream 23 . In one embodiment the catalyst suppresses the formation of asphaltenes. In the most preferred embodiment it does both. The catalyst is preferably a metal selected from the group consisting of a Groups IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, and VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements, and mixtures thereof. The most preferred catalyst is molybdenum. The catalyst can be employed in its elemental form or in the form of a compound.
  • In another embodiment the thermal cracking, which occurs in thermal cracker 24, is practiced in the presence of a hydrogen donor such as hydrogen gas or a hydrogen donor diluent stream.
  • In an additional embodiment of the present invention hydrogen gas is supplied to the thermal cracker 24 in order to improve performance.
  • It is believed that the advantages and improved results furnished by the method and apparatus of the present in are apparent from the foregoing description of the invention.

Claims (12)

  1. A process for upgrading a hydrocarbon feed containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes and producing a substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction, said process characterized by:
    a) applying said hydrocarbon feed as a first stream directly (13) to a distillation column (14) for fractionating it, said distillation column producing a substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction (16), (37) and a non-distilled fraction (18) containing sulfur, asphaltenes, and metals;
    b) converting (27), (30), (31) at least some of said substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction (16) to a hydrogen donor diluent (17A);
    c) processing said non-distilled fraction in a solvent deasphalting unit (19) for producing a deasphalted oil stream (20) and an asphaltene stream (21);
    d) combining (22) said hydrogen donor diluent (17A) with said deasphalted oil stream (20) to form a combined stream;
    e) thermal cracking (24) said combined stream for forming a thermally cracked stream (25); and
    f) applying said thermally cracked stream (25) as a second stream to said distillation column (14) such that said thermally cracked stream (25) , which is fed to said distillation column (14) is also fractionated in said distillation column (14).
    wherein converting at least some of said substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction to a hydrogen donor diluent includes:
    b1) catalytically hydrogenating at least a portion of said substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate fraction for forming a hydrotreated stream;
    b2) fractionating said hydrotreated stream for forming substantially asphaltene-free, and metal-free distillate, and said hydrogen donor diluent.
  2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said hydrogen donor diluent is combined with said deasphalted oil stream in the ratio of about 0.25 to 4 parts of hydrogen donor diluent to 1 part of deasphalted oil.
  3. A process according to claim 1 including burning at least a portion of said distillate stream for producing power.
  4. A process according to claim 1 wherein the thermal cracking of said combined stream is practiced in the presence of a catalyst.
  5. A process according to claim 4 wherein the catalyst promotes cracking of said combined stream.
  6. A process according to claim 4 wherein the catalyst suppresses the formation of asphaltenes.
  7. A 2 process according to claim 4 wherein the catalyst suppresses the formation of asphaltenes, and wherein the catalyst promotes cracking of said combined stream.
  8. A process according to claim 4 wherein the catalyst is a metal selected from the group consisting of a Groups IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, and VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements, and mixtures thereof.
  9. A process according to claim 4 wherein the catalyst is a molybdenum.
  10. A process of claim 1 wherein the thermal cracking is practiced in the presence of a hydrogen donor.
  11. A process of claim 10 wherein the hydrogen donor is hydrogen gas.
  12. A process of claim 10 wherein the hydrogen donor is a hydrogen donor diluent stream.
EP99117256A 1998-09-03 1999-09-02 Process and apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes Expired - Lifetime EP0984054B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US146534 1988-01-21
US261157 1994-06-17
US09/146,534 US6274003B1 (en) 1998-09-03 1998-09-03 Apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes
US09/261,157 US6183627B1 (en) 1998-09-03 1999-03-03 Process and apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0984054A2 EP0984054A2 (en) 2000-03-08
EP0984054A3 EP0984054A3 (en) 2000-04-05
EP0984054B1 true EP0984054B1 (en) 2011-08-03

Family

ID=26844028

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99117256A Expired - Lifetime EP0984054B1 (en) 1998-09-03 1999-09-02 Process and apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0984054B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1313577C (en)
AU (1) AU5754999A (en)
BR (1) BR9904043A (en)
CA (1) CA2281058C (en)
EA (1) EA001938B1 (en)
EG (1) EG21975A (en)
ID (1) ID23605A (en)
IL (1) IL141696A (en)
MX (1) MXPA01002304A (en)
TR (1) TR199902131A2 (en)
WO (1) WO2000014178A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2182993C (en) * 1994-12-13 2001-08-07 Brian William Davies Fuel oil compositions
US20030129109A1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2003-07-10 Yoram Bronicki Method of and apparatus for processing heavy hydrocarbon feeds description
CN102504862B (en) * 2011-11-18 2014-04-02 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of hydrogen supply thermal cracking method
US20140221709A1 (en) * 2013-02-04 2014-08-07 Lummus Technology Inc. Integration of residue hydrocracking and solvent deasphalting
SG11201606307PA (en) 2014-02-25 2016-08-30 Saudi Basic Ind Corp A process for the preparation of a feedstock for a hydroprocessing unit
CN105733671A (en) * 2014-12-10 2016-07-06 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and system for producing upgraded oil from inferior heavy oil
RU2620795C1 (en) * 2016-03-31 2017-05-29 Публичное акционерное общество "Газпром" Installation of synthetic oil facilities refining
CA2963436C (en) 2017-04-06 2022-09-20 Iftikhar Huq Partial upgrading of bitumen
SG11202104096SA (en) * 2018-11-07 2021-05-28 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc Process for c5+ hydrocarbon conversion

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL7507484A (en) * 1975-06-23 1976-12-27 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS.
NL7510465A (en) * 1975-09-05 1977-03-08 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS.
NL190815C (en) * 1978-07-07 1994-09-01 Shell Int Research Process for the preparation of gas oil.
NL8201119A (en) * 1982-03-18 1983-10-17 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR PREPARING HYDROCARBON OIL DISTILLATES
US4485004A (en) * 1982-09-07 1984-11-27 Gulf Canada Limited Catalytic hydrocracking in the presence of hydrogen donor
CA1222471A (en) * 1985-06-28 1987-06-02 H. John Woods Process for improving the yield of distillables in hydrogen donor diluent cracking
US5192421A (en) * 1991-04-16 1993-03-09 Mobil Oil Corporation Integrated process for whole crude deasphalting and asphaltene upgrading

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TR199902131A3 (en) 2000-04-21
EA001938B1 (en) 2001-10-22
EP0984054A3 (en) 2000-04-05
EG21975A (en) 2002-05-31
EP0984054A2 (en) 2000-03-08
WO2000014178A1 (en) 2000-03-16
CA2281058A1 (en) 2000-03-03
EA199900714A3 (en) 2000-08-28
AU5754999A (en) 2000-03-27
CN1313577C (en) 2007-05-02
WO2000014178A8 (en) 2001-03-08
IL141696A0 (en) 2002-03-10
CA2281058C (en) 2008-08-05
BR9904043A (en) 2000-08-29
ID23605A (en) 2000-05-04
EA199900714A2 (en) 2000-04-24
TR199902131A2 (en) 2000-04-21
IL141696A (en) 2004-07-25
MXPA01002304A (en) 2002-04-24
CN1323339A (en) 2001-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6183627B1 (en) Process and apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes
US7297250B2 (en) Method of and apparatus for processing heavy hydrocarbon feeds
US4686028A (en) Upgrading of high boiling hydrocarbons
US7594990B2 (en) Hydrogen donor solvent production and use in resid hydrocracking processes
US10344225B2 (en) Process to upgrade partially converted vacuum residua
US9687804B2 (en) Conversion of asphaltenic pitch within an ebullated bed residuum hydrocracking process
US20100122934A1 (en) Integrated Solvent Deasphalting and Slurry Hydrocracking Process
US20100122932A1 (en) Integrated Slurry Hydrocracking and Coking Process
EP0984054B1 (en) Process and apparatus for upgrading hydrocarbon feeds containing sulfur, metals, and asphaltenes
CN110023461B (en) Flexible Hydroprocessing of Slurry Hydrocracked Products
EP4613829A1 (en) A process for conversion of hydrocracked pitch

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000929

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AXX Extension fees paid

Free format text: AL PAYMENT 20000929;LT PAYMENT 20000929;LV PAYMENT 20000929;MK PAYMENT 20000929;RO PAYMENT 20000929;SI PAYMENT 20000929

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030220

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 69943609

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20110803

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20110803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111205

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 518938

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20110803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111104

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20120531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110803

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120504

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69943609

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120403

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20111103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120403

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110930

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110902

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111003

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110902