[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0945044B1 - Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator - Google Patents

Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0945044B1
EP0945044B1 EP96943123A EP96943123A EP0945044B1 EP 0945044 B1 EP0945044 B1 EP 0945044B1 EP 96943123 A EP96943123 A EP 96943123A EP 96943123 A EP96943123 A EP 96943123A EP 0945044 B1 EP0945044 B1 EP 0945044B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
control
integrator
signal
stage
output
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP96943123A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0945044A1 (en
Inventor
Lars Baekgaard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Topholm and Westermann ApS
Original Assignee
Topholm and Westermann ApS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Topholm and Westermann ApS filed Critical Topholm and Westermann ApS
Publication of EP0945044A1 publication Critical patent/EP0945044A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0945044B1 publication Critical patent/EP0945044B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/505Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/502Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using analog signal processing

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a hearing aid, preferably to a programmable hearing aid having at least one microphone, at least one signal processor with at least one channel, an output amplifier and an output transducer, at least one of the channels containing a signal processing circuit with at least one percentile estimator for the continuous determination or calculation of at least one percentile value of the input signal from a continuous analysis and evaluation of the frequency and/or amplitude distribution of the input signal, whereby the percentile value(s) serve either directly or indirectly as control signals for controlling the gain and/or the frequency response of the electronic processing circuit, the percentile estimator consisting essentially of a comparator stage with two inputs and two outputs, the first input being directly or indirectly connected to the input of the hearing aid, its two outputs controlling a first control stage the output signals of which control a first integrator, the output of which, directly or indirectly, conveys a control signal to the signal processing circuit and the second input of the comparator stage.
  • Percentile estimators which may also be used in hearing aids, are known in principle from US-A 4.204.260.
  • the percentile estimators have to work very slowly to achieve an almost constant gain for speech signals. This works very well if one stays in an environment where the level of sound is not varying too much, but the long response times of the system will in some cases not adapt fast enough to changes in environment, resulting in phrases not being heard.
  • a common problem is the situation where the user of the hearing aid is yelling a message to a distant person. This will increase the percentile estimate and hence reduce the gain in the hearing aid. Since the percentile estimator works slowly, the gain stays reduced for a while, and the hearing aid user will not be able to hear the distant person answering, because the resulting output of the hearing aid will be very low, perhaps even below the users hearing threshold level.
  • percentile estimators operating on the present signal in one or more channels may be used for controlling the gain of the electronic signal processors.
  • Such a system is f.i. disclosed in WO 95/15668 of applicant.
  • a percentile estimator structure having at least a second control stage connected to the first control stage, and at least one additional integrator controlled by the second control stage, the output of which is connected to a further input of the second control stage as well as to a multiplier stage, interconnected between the first control stage and the first integrator.
  • the second control stage supplies a rectified and scaled version of the predefined parameters of the first control stage, generating a positive control signal for the second integrator and a forward reset signal to said second integrator for establishing a predefined minimum value of said integrator whenever the output signal of the first control stage changes.
  • Fig. 1 shows a principle circuit diagram of a multi-channel hearing aid with one microphone 1 and preamplifier 2, a band split filter 3 for splitting the signals into a number of channels (here 3 is shown), each having a signal processing circuit 4 consisting of a signal processor 5 and a percentile estimator 6, a register 7 for storing parameters related to the basic hearing aid performance, a summing circuit 8, an output amplifier 9 and a receiver 10.
  • Fig. 2 shows the principle of a traditional percentile estimator 6. Such percentile estimators are known from US-A 4.204.260.
  • the input signal for the specific channel is led into a detector stage 11, which is not essential for the operation of the percentile estimator, but is preferably used. It could include a rectification for determining the envelope of the input signal, and also a logarithmic conversion to obtain the envelope on a dB-scale, which is commonly used in hearing aids.
  • the output signal from the detector 11 is supplied to a comparator 12 with its two inputs connected to the output from the detector 11 and an integrator 14.
  • the result of the comparison is supplied to the control stage 13, which in case of the output of the integrator 14 being greater than the output of the detector 11 holds a predefined negative value at its output, causing a decrease of the value stored in the integrator 14, and in the opposite case holds a predefined positive value at its output, causing an increase of the integrator value.
  • the value present at the output of the integrator 14 will be a percentile estimate of the input signal of the detector 11 and the signal processor 5, the percentile value being dependent on the actual predefined values of the control stage 13.
  • the output of the percentile estimator 6 is used for controlling the signal processor 5.
  • Fig. 3 shows the principle of an improved percentile estimator in accordance with the invention.
  • the traditional percentile estimator is modified with a multiplier 15, with its output supplying the integrator 14 and its inputs connected to the output of the control stage 13 and the output of an integrator 17.
  • the integrator 17 is controlled by a control stage 16 which includes a rectifier 21 and a gain block 22for rectifying and scaling the predefined parameters of the control stage 13 and thereby modifying the timing of the increase and decrease of the integrator 14 and thus the response time of the percentile estimator.
  • the control stage includes a zero-cross detector 23 which provides a reset pulse for the integrator, which then resets to a predefined minimum value whenever the output from the control stage 13 changes, hence whenever the input sound crosses the percentile estimator level.
  • the control stage 16 further may include a comparator 24 for checking if the output of the integrator 17 is less than a predefined maximum allowable value 25, in which case the transmission control 26 passes the output of the gain block 22 on to the integrator 17, and in the opposite case passes a value of zero or less on to the integrator 17 in order to prevent further increase of the integrator output.
  • the effect is an "accelerating" percentile estimator.
  • the short term percentile estimator response time is long, dependent on the minimum value of the integrator 17 and will be dominant when the environment is characterized by a relatively constant sound level, where the input sound level crosses the percentile estimate frequently.
  • the long term response time is relatively short because of the acceleration, and this effect will be of use in cases where the sound level changes, e.g. when communicating with a distant person, as mentioned earlier.
  • Fig. 4 shows an expansion of the improved percentile estimator by another level by adding a multiplier 18 with its output supplying the integrator 17 and its inputs connected to the output of the control stage 16 and the output of an integrator 20, which again is controlled by a control stage 19 similar to control stage 16.
  • the integrationspeeds are time dependent.
  • the upward integration speed is determined by and the downward integration speed is where k 16 and k 19 are the scaling factors in the control stages 16 and 19.
  • the percentile level can be obtained by the same formula as for the traditional percentile estimator, since a constant multiplied to the integration speeds u and d does not change this formula.
  • Fig. 5 shows the function of a 2-level improved 90% percentile estimator with an increase from a minimum odB/sec growing 207.36 dB/sec 2 to a maximum of 57.6 dB/sec and a decrease from a minimum odB/sec growing 2,56 dB/sec 2 to a maximum of 6.4 dB/sec.
  • the function is compared with a traditional 90% percentile estimator with an increase of 14.4dB/sec and a decrease of 1.6dB/sec.
  • the comparison is performed on an actual sound example with a duration of 32 secs.
  • the sound level is stepped down 20dB after approximately 7 secs to simulate a change of sound environment.
  • the improved percentile estimator because of the increasing integration speed,adapts much faster to change in environment than the traditional one, with respect to sound level increases (see the first 2 seconds) as well as sound level decreases (see the signal behaviour around 7 seconds).
  • the improved percentile estimator behaves similar to the traditional one in the time range where the percentile estimation in both cases has become "stationary", i.e. from approximately 20secs to 32secs. This is due to the signal crossing the output of the improved percentile estimator, which generates a frequent reset of the integrator speed, and hereby keeps the response time of the percentile estimator long for this signal.
  • control stages 13 and the scaling factors of control stages 16 and 19 may be preset, may be programmable or may even be program controlled.
  • the register 7 in Fig. 1 should comprise all necessary control parameters for the control of the transfer characteristic of the hearing aid, possibly also for various different programmed or programmable environmental listening situations.

Landscapes

  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Tone Control, Compression And Expansion, Limiting Amplitude (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Electroluminescent Light Sources (AREA)
  • Measuring Pulse, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure Or Blood Flow (AREA)
  • Diaphragms For Electromechanical Transducers (AREA)
  • Measurement And Recording Of Electrical Phenomena And Electrical Characteristics Of The Living Body (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a hearing aid, preferably a programmable hearing aid, having at least one microphone (1), at least one signal processor with at least one channel, an output amplifier (9) and an output transducer (10), at least one of the channels containing a signal processing circuit (4) with at least one percentile estimator (6) for the continuous determination or calculation of at least one percentile value of the input signal from a continuous analysis and evaluation of the frequency and/or amplitude distribution of the input signal, whereby the percentile value(s) serve either directly or indirectly as control signals for controlling the gain and/or the frequency response of the electronic processing circuit, the percentile estimator (6) consisting essentially of a comparator stage (12) with two inputs and two outputs, the first input being directly or indirectly connected to the input of the hearing aid, its two outputs controlling a first control stage (13) the output signals of which control a first integrator (14), the output of which, directly or indirectly, conveys a control signal to the signal processing circuit (5) and the second input of the comparator stage. The invention comprises at least a second control stage (16) connected to the first control stage (13), and at least one additional integrator (17) controlled by the second control stage (16), the output of which is connected to a further input of the second control stage (16) and to a multiplier stage (15) interconnected between the first control stage (13) and the first integrator (14).

Description

    Background of the invention
  • The invention relates to a hearing aid, preferably to a programmable hearing aid having at least one microphone, at least one signal processor with at least one channel, an output amplifier and an output transducer, at least one of the channels containing a signal processing circuit with at least one percentile estimator for the continuous determination or calculation of at least one percentile value of the input signal from a continuous analysis and evaluation of the frequency and/or amplitude distribution of the input signal, whereby the percentile value(s) serve either directly or indirectly as control signals for controlling the gain and/or the frequency response of the electronic processing circuit, the percentile estimator consisting essentially of a comparator stage with two inputs and two outputs, the first input being directly or indirectly connected to the input of the hearing aid, its two outputs controlling a first control stage the output signals of which control a first integrator, the output of which, directly or indirectly, conveys a control signal to the signal processing circuit and the second input of the comparator stage.
  • Percentile estimators which may also be used in hearing aids, are known in principle from US-A 4.204.260.
  • Clinical tests have shown, that the use of correctly fitted hearing aids, i.e. hearing aids with constant gain, independent of signal-levels, in noisy as well as quiet surroundings are superior to hearing aids with an automatic gain control, with respect to speech comprehension. However, while linear hearing aids require the user to adjust the volume control dependent on the actual listening environment, hearing aids with automatic gain control adapt themselves to the environment and thereby clearly improve the ease-of-use.
  • Based on the clinical tests mentioned above, the percentile estimators have to work very slowly to achieve an almost constant gain for speech signals. This works very well if one stays in an environment where the level of sound is not varying too much, but the long response times of the system will in some cases not adapt fast enough to changes in environment, resulting in phrases not being heard.
  • A common problem is the situation where the user of the hearing aid is yelling a message to a distant person. This will increase the percentile estimate and hence reduce the gain in the hearing aid. Since the percentile estimator works slowly, the gain stays reduced for a while, and the hearing aid user will not be able to hear the distant person answering, because the resulting output of the hearing aid will be very low, perhaps even below the users hearing threshold level.
  • On the other hand one could let the percentile estimators work fast, which obviously will make the system adapt faster to changes in environment, but the gain can then not be consi dered constant for the speech signals. The fast gain adjustment of the system will cause "pumping"-effects, which can be very annoying for the user, especially in noisy surroundings, and may result in loss of speech comprehension.
  • In an automatic gain control system for hearing aids, percentile estimators. operating on the present signal in one or more channels may be used for controlling the gain of the electronic signal processors. Such a system is f.i. disclosed in WO 95/15668 of applicant.
  • Summary of the invention
  • It is an object of the present invention to create an improved percentile estimator, particularly for use in hearing aids of the kind referred to above, which makes it possible for the hearing aid to adapt fast to changes in the environment, while maintaining a slow response when operating on continuous signals, e.g. speech signals in a steady environment.
  • This is achieved in a hearing aid as referred to above in accordance with the present invention with a percentile estimator structure having at least a second control stage connected to the first control stage, and at least one additional integrator controlled by the second control stage, the output of which is connected to a further input of the second control stage as well as to a multiplier stage, interconnected between the first control stage and the first integrator.
  • It is of particular importance that the second control stage supplies a rectified and scaled version of the predefined parameters of the first control stage, generating a positive control signal for the second integrator and a forward reset signal to said second integrator for establishing a predefined minimum value of said integrator whenever the output signal of the first control stage changes.
  • Other characteristics of the invention and advantageous further embodiments thereof are subject of the remaining claims.
  • Brief description of the drawings
  • In the drawings
  • Fig. 1
    shows a schematic circuit diagram of a multichannel hearing aid using percentile estimators;
    Fig. 2
    shows a schematic diagram of the principle of a percentile estimator;
    Fig. 3
    shows,schematically, an improved percentile estimator for hearing aids with two levels in accordance with the present invention;
    Fig. 4
    shows, schematically, an improved percentile estimator for hearing aids with three levels in accordance with the invention and
    Fig. 5
    shows a diagram of the operation of a traditional percentile estimator in comparison with the operation of the improved percentile estimator on an actual sound example.
    Detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 1 shows a principle circuit diagram of a multi-channel hearing aid with one microphone 1 and preamplifier 2, a band split filter 3 for splitting the signals into a number of channels (here 3 is shown), each having a signal processing circuit 4 consisting of a signal processor 5 and a percentile estimator 6, a register 7 for storing parameters related to the basic hearing aid performance, a summing circuit 8, an output amplifier 9 and a receiver 10.
  • Fig. 2 shows the principle of a traditional percentile estimator 6. Such percentile estimators are known from US-A 4.204.260.
  • The input signal for the specific channel is led into a detector stage 11, which is not essential for the operation of the percentile estimator, but is preferably used. It could include a rectification for determining the envelope of the input signal, and also a logarithmic conversion to obtain the envelope on a dB-scale, which is commonly used in hearing aids. The output signal from the detector 11 is supplied to a comparator 12 with its two inputs connected to the output from the detector 11 and an integrator 14.
  • The result of the comparison is supplied to the control stage 13, which in case of the output of the integrator 14 being greater than the output of the detector 11 holds a predefined negative value at its output, causing a decrease of the value stored in the integrator 14, and in the opposite case holds a predefined positive value at its output, causing an increase of the integrator value.
  • In this way the value present at the output of the integrator 14 will be a percentile estimate of the input signal of the detector 11 and the signal processor 5, the percentile value being dependent on the actual predefined values of the control stage 13.
  • The output of the percentile estimator 6 is used for controlling the signal processor 5. Clearly, it is possible to include more than one percentile estimator 6 in each channel and let the signal processor be controlled by all of these in combination. In that case,a combination and control logic may be used to combine the output signals of the different percentile estimators.
  • Fig. 3 shows the principle of an improved percentile estimator in accordance with the invention.
  • The traditional percentile estimator is modified with a multiplier 15, with its output supplying the integrator 14 and its inputs connected to the output of the control stage 13 and the output of an integrator 17. The integrator 17 is controlled by a control stage 16 which includes a rectifier 21 and a gain block 22for rectifying and scaling the predefined parameters of the control stage 13 and thereby modifying the timing of the increase and decrease of the integrator 14 and thus the response time of the percentile estimator.
  • The control stage includes a zero-cross detector 23 which provides a reset pulse for the integrator, which then resets to a predefined minimum value whenever the output from the control stage 13 changes, hence whenever the input sound crosses the percentile estimator level.
  • The control stage 16 further may include a comparator 24 for checking if the output of the integrator 17 is less than a predefined maximum allowable value 25, in which case the transmission control 26 passes the output of the gain block 22 on to the integrator 17, and in the opposite case passes a value of zero or less on to the integrator 17 in order to prevent further increase of the integrator output.
  • The effect is an "accelerating" percentile estimator. The short term percentile estimator response time is long, dependent on the minimum value of the integrator 17 and will be dominant when the environment is characterized by a relatively constant sound level, where the input sound level crosses the percentile estimate frequently. The long term response time is relatively short because of the acceleration, and this effect will be of use in cases where the sound level changes, e.g. when communicating with a distant person, as mentioned earlier.
  • Fig. 4 shows an expansion of the improved percentile estimator by another level by adding a multiplier 18 with its output supplying the integrator 17 and its inputs connected to the output of the control stage 16 and the output of an integrator 20, which again is controlled by a control stage 19 similar to control stage 16.
  • Clearly it is possible to expand the number of levels in the improved percentile estimator even more than the three levels shown.
  • For the traditional percentile estimator of Fig. 2 a percentile level of p percent is obtained by the following formula: p = 100 u/(u-d) where
  • u is the upward integration value (positive)
  • d is the downward integration value (negative)
  • Both u and d in the formula above are defined by the predefined values of the control stage 13.
  • In the improved percentile estimator, the integrationspeeds are time dependent. The upward integration speed is determined by
    Figure 00070001
    and the downward integration speed is
    Figure 00070002
    where k16 and k19 are the scaling factors in the control stages 16 and 19.
  • In a "stationary" sound environment, i.e. when the percentile estimate is stable, we have |u| · tu = |d|·td = constant where tu and td are the collective time intervals over this stable time period in which the integrator integrates upwards and downwards, respectively.
  • This simplifies the integration in the formulas above, and yields the following expressions for the integration speeds of the improved percentile estimator: uresult = u·k16·|u|·k19·|u|·tu......tu = u·k16·k19 ...... constant dresult = d · k16·|d|·k19·|d|·td......td = d ·k16 · k19 ...... constant
  • Hence, for stationary environments, even though the integration speeds are time dependent, the percentile level can be obtained by the same formula as for the traditional percentile estimator, since a constant multiplied to the integration speeds u and d does not change this formula.
  • Fig. 5 shows the function of a 2-level improved 90% percentile estimator with an increase from a minimum odB/sec growing 207.36 dB/sec2 to a maximum of 57.6 dB/sec and a decrease from a minimum odB/sec growing 2,56 dB/sec2 to a maximum of 6.4 dB/sec.
  • This is achieved by using a digital implementation with:
  • a 32 kHz sampling frequency
  • an upward integration step of u = 5e - 4 in the control stage 13
  • a downward integration step of d = - 5e - 5 in the control stage 13
  • a scaling factor of k16 = 1 in the control stage 16
  • a predefined minimum value of 0 of the integrator 17
  • a predefined maximum allowable value of 4 of the integrator 17
  • The function is compared with a traditional 90% percentile estimator with an increase of 14.4dB/sec and a decrease of 1.6dB/sec.
  • The comparison is performed on an actual sound example with a duration of 32 secs. The sound level is stepped down 20dB after approximately 7 secs to simulate a change of sound environment.
  • Note that the improved percentile estimator, because of the increasing integration speed,adapts much faster to change in environment than the traditional one, with respect to sound level increases (see the first 2 seconds) as well as sound level decreases (see the signal behaviour around 7 seconds).
  • Still, the improved percentile estimator behaves similar to the traditional one in the time range where the percentile estimation in both cases has become "stationary", i.e. from approximately 20secs to 32secs. This is due to the signal crossing the output of the improved percentile estimator, which generates a frequent reset of the integrator speed, and hereby keeps the response time of the percentile estimator long for this signal.
  • Finally, it may be pointed out that all the parameters of control stages 13 and the scaling factors of control stages 16 and 19 may be preset, may be programmable or may even be program controlled.
  • The steady progress in the design of very highly integrated circuits may lead to an extremely compact design of hearing aids, incorporating not only the improved percentile estimators for one or several channels but also the microprocessor and storage means for the necessary operational tools, such as algorithms .
  • Furthermore it is to be understood that the register 7 in Fig. 1 should comprise all necessary control parameters for the control of the transfer characteristic of the hearing aid, possibly also for various different programmed or programmable environmental listening situations.

Claims (11)

  1. A hearing aid having at least one microphone (1) for providing an input signal, at least one signal processing channel (4) receiving and processing at least a portion of said input signal to produce at least one output signal, an output amplifier (9) for amplifying said at least one output signal, and an output transducer (10) responsive to the amplified output signal, said at least one channel including a signal processing circuit (5) for processing saint input signal portion in accordance with an output, signal from a percentile estimator (6), said percentile estimator including a comparator stage (12) for comparing said input signal portion to an integrated value, a control stage (13) being responsive to an output signal from said comparator stage (12) for providing an integrator control signal representing a value anti a direction of integration in accordance with said comparison, and an integrator (14) responsive to said integrator control signal, providing said integrated value to said comparator stage (12), and, as said output signal to said signal processing circuit (5), characterized by a multiplier stage (15) interconnected between the output of said first mentioned control stage (13) and the input of said integrator (14) for modifying said value of the integrator control signal of said first control stage (13), and by a second control stage (16) responsive to the integrator control signal of said first control stage (13) for controlling a second integrator (17) for providing a modification signal to the multiplier stage (15).
  2. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that the output of the second integrator (17) provides an integrated value signal to a further input of the second control stage (16).
  3. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that the second control stage (16) supplies a rectified and scaled version of predefined control parameters of the first control stage (13), generating a positive control signal for the second integrator (17) and a forward reset signal to said second integrator (17) for establishing a predefined minimum value of said integrator (17) whenever the output signal of the first control stage (13) changes.
  4. Hearing aid in accordance with claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the second control stage (16) contains a zero-cross-detector stage (23) coupled between the input of said control stage (16) and a second input of the second integrator (17), providing the reset signal for said integrator (17) for resetting said integrator to a predefined minimum value, whenever the output of the first control stage (13) changes, hence whenever the input sound of the hearing aid crosses the percentile estimator value.
  5. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that the second control stage (16) additionally comprises a rectifier stage (21), a gain block (22) and a transmission control stage (26) controlling the second integrator (17), for rectifying and scaling the predetermined control parameters of the first control stage (13) for controlling the second integrator (17), the output of which is connected with the input of the second control stage (16) by means of a comparator stage (24) for comparing its output with a predefined maximum allowable value (25) to control the passage of the output of the gain block (22) to the second integrator (17) by means of the transmission control stage (26).
  6. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1, characterized by a third control stage (19) connected to the first control stage (13) for controlling a third integrator (20), and a second multiplier (18) connected between the second control stage (16) and the second integrator (17) and also with the output of the third integrator (20), the output of which is further connected to the third control stage (19) for rectifying and scaling the predetermined control parameters of the first control stage (13), generating a positive control signal for the third integrator (20) and a forward reset signal to said integrator for establishing a predefined minimum value of the integrator (20) whenever the sign of the output signal of the first control stage (13) changes.
  7. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that the values of the predefined parameters and/or the predefined scaling factors of the control stages (13, 16, 19) for the control of the integrators (14, 17, 20) may be preset, programmed or program controlled.
  8. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that the values of the output signals of the control stages (13, 16, 19) may or may not be equal for the positive or negative changes to be effected in the integrators (14, 17, 20).
  9. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that for the purpose of the continuous determination of a signal sequence from the input signal, a detector stage (11) is connected between the input of the hearing aid and the input of the percentile estimator (6) for mathematical processing of the input signal by way of predefined or predefinable algorithms or calculating rules.
  10. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that for the purpose of the continuous determination of the envelope of the input signal, a rectifier is connected between the input of the hearing aid and the input of the percentile estimator (6) as a detector stage (11).
  11. Hearing aid in accordance with claim 1 with at least two channels, characterized in that at least two percentile estimators (6) are connected in parallel in at least two parallel channels covering essentially adjacent-frequency bands and in which the outputs of the integrators of these percentile estimators (6) of the respective channels are connected with the inputs of a combination and control logic, said combination and control logi c being connected in turn to the signal processor (5) of the respective channel via at least one control line.
EP96943123A 1996-12-14 1996-12-14 Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator Expired - Lifetime EP0945044B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002257461A CA2257461C (en) 1996-12-14 1996-12-14 Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator
PCT/EP1996/005623 WO1998027787A1 (en) 1996-12-14 1996-12-14 Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0945044A1 EP0945044A1 (en) 1999-09-29
EP0945044B1 true EP0945044B1 (en) 2000-06-07

Family

ID=25680690

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96943123A Expired - Lifetime EP0945044B1 (en) 1996-12-14 1996-12-14 Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0945044B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3131226B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE193797T1 (en)
AU (1) AU725726B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2257461C (en)
DE (1) DE69608822T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0945044T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1998027787A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU761865B2 (en) 1999-02-05 2003-06-12 Hearworks Pty Ltd Adaptive dynamic range optimisation sound processor
US7366315B2 (en) 1999-02-05 2008-04-29 Hearworks Pty, Limited Adaptive dynamic range optimization sound processor
AU764610B2 (en) * 1999-10-07 2003-08-28 Widex A/S Method and signal processor for intensification of speech signal components in a hearing aid
AU2001246395A1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2001-10-15 Gn Resound A/S A hearing prosthesis with automatic classification of the listening environment
US6862359B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2005-03-01 Gn Resound A/S Hearing prosthesis with automatic classification of the listening environment
DE602006014572D1 (en) 2005-10-14 2010-07-08 Gn Resound As OPTIMIZATION FOR HEARING EQUIPMENT PARAMETERS
CN101310562A (en) * 2005-10-18 2008-11-19 唯听助听器公司 Hearing aid comprising data recorder and operation method therefor
EP2649812B1 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-06-25 Widex A/S Hearing aid and a method of enhancing speech reproduction

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4204260A (en) * 1977-06-14 1980-05-20 Unisearch Limited Recursive percentile estimator
US4823795A (en) * 1987-03-13 1989-04-25 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Signal processor for and an auditory prosthesis having spectral to temporal transformation
US5027410A (en) * 1988-11-10 1991-06-25 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Adaptive, programmable signal processing and filtering for hearing aids
DE4340817A1 (en) * 1993-12-01 1995-06-08 Toepholm & Westermann Circuit arrangement for the automatic control of hearing aids

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69608822D1 (en) 2000-07-13
CA2257461C (en) 2001-04-17
AU725726B2 (en) 2000-10-19
DK0945044T3 (en) 2000-10-16
CA2257461A1 (en) 1998-06-25
ATE193797T1 (en) 2000-06-15
JP2000511367A (en) 2000-08-29
WO1998027787A1 (en) 1998-06-25
DE69608822T2 (en) 2000-11-30
AU1195397A (en) 1998-07-15
JP3131226B2 (en) 2001-01-31
EP0945044A1 (en) 1999-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8045720B2 (en) Method for dynamic determination of time constants, method for level detection, method for compressing an electric audio signal and hearing aid, wherein the method for compression is used
JP2962732B2 (en) Hearing aid signal processing system
US5687241A (en) Circuit arrangement for automatic gain control of hearing aids
US4747143A (en) Speech enhancement system having dynamic gain control
EP0787383B1 (en) Automatic sensitivity control
US4405831A (en) Apparatus for selective noise suppression for hearing aids
US6453041B1 (en) Voice activity detection system and method
US5165017A (en) Automatic gain control circuit in a feed forward configuration
US4475230A (en) Hearing aid
EP0945044B1 (en) Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator
US20230262402A1 (en) Adaptive hearing normalization and correction system with automatic tuning
US6748092B1 (en) Hearing aid with improved percentile estimator
JP2979119B2 (en) Automatic dynamic range control circuit
WO1983002862A1 (en) A method and a device for the damping of transients
JPH0822117B2 (en) Broadcast volume control device in public space
JPH0435144A (en) Telephone system
JPH0773175B2 (en) Automatic gain control device
JPH0632538B2 (en) Howling detector
JPH03186006A (en) Automatic gain controller
JPH03289743A (en) Telephone set
JPH0644724B2 (en) Howling detector
JPS59112710A (en) Voice input level control system
JPS63260210A (en) Automatic gain controller
JPH06175676A (en) Voice detector
GB2029140A (en) Speech processor with automatic gain control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990329

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT CH DE DK GB IT LI NL

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19991028

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT CH DE DK GB IT LI NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 193797

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20000615

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69608822

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20000713

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL & PARTNER AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

EN Fr: translation not filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20061203

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20061213

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20061213

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20061231

Year of fee payment: 11

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20071214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071214

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20080701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071214

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20101210

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20101215

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20101208

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69608822

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: BETTEN & RESCH, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69608822

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: BETTEN & RESCH PATENT- UND RECHTSANWAELTE PART, DE

Effective date: 20120119

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69608822

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE BETTEN & RESCH, DE

Effective date: 20120119

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 69608822

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: WIDEX A/S, DK

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: TOPHOLM & WESTERMANN APS, VAERLOESE, DK

Effective date: 20120119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69608822

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120703

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111231

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111231

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120703

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120102