TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a test device which,
as compared to a conventional microplate, makes chemical or
microbiological tests that require multiple reaction items
simpler and more expeditious, and which can be mass-produced
in an industrially advantageous manner.
BACKGROUND ART
A chemical test involving a step of causing a chemical
sample to react with a certain reagent, or a microbiological
test involving a step of incubating a microorganism in a
sample―especially a test that requires treatment of
numerous samples, reaction with various reagents, incubation
in many systems, or like procedures―generally employs a
plastic microplate provided with a plurality of wells
functioning as reaction containers or culture vessels.
In a test employing a microplate of this type,
reactions or incubations of a microorganism are
independently performed in each well of the plate. For
example, in MIC measurement performed by Microbroth dilution
method using a microplate, antimicrobial chemicals having
different concentrations are added to a plurality of wells,
in which the growth of the microorganism of interest is
observed so as to thereby determine the Minimum inhibitory
concentration.
As test devices usable for such a test, there are
commercially sold microplates of a type prepared, for
example, by dispensing a predetermined amount of an
antimicrobial chemical to each well of the microplate and
subsequently drying or freezing for storage. However, these
test devices unavoidably come to be expensive, since the
cost of a microplate itself is considerably high. Therefore,
there exists an increased demand for low-price devices.
Another problem is that, when numerous tests are
conducted through use of a single sample, a predetermined
amount of sample must be placed dropwise in each well,
making operations intricate.
In view of the foregoing, an object of the present
invention is to provide a test device which can be mass-produced
at reduced cost, and, inter alia, which permits
simple and expeditious chemical or microbiological tests for
multiple reaction items.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Under the above-mentioned circumstances, the present
inventors conducted careful studies and found that, through
use of a liquid-absorptive sheet in which the portions other
than the portions corresponding to wells (liquid-absorptive
sections) of a microplate have undergone hydrophobicity
treatment, leakage of test liquid from the liquid-absorptive
sections is prevented, the amount of water absorbed by the
water absorptive sections is made constant, and such
microplates can be mass-produced at reduced cost because
hydrophobicity treatment such as printing is employed for
production. They also found that when the thus-prepared
liquid-absorptive sections are used in combination with a
diffusion section for supplying a test liquid, dropwise
addition of a test liquid to a single point of the diffusion
section enables testing of multiple items. The present
invention was achieved based on these findings.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a sheet-like
test device characterized in that the portions other
than the portions that function as liquid-absorptive
sections of a liquid-absorptive sheet are subjected to a
hydrophobicity treatment so that a plurality of water-absorptive
portions which are caused to react with a test
liquid are formed separately from one another (hereinafter
referred to as a "sheet-like test device of the present
invention").
The present invention also provides a test device
characterized by comprising the aforementioned sheet-like
test device of the present invention and a diffusion section
which maintains contact with at least a portion of each
liquid-absorptive section and supplies a test liquid to the
liquid-absorptive section (hereinafter referred to as a
"test device of the present invention").
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 shows a test device of the present invention
manufactured in accordance with Example 2, wherein numeral 1
indicates liquid-absorptive sections, numeral 2 indicates a
diffusion section, and numeral 3 indicates a test-liquid
supply hole; and
Fig. 2 shows a test device of the present invention
(including its housing).
BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Examples of material for the liquid-absorptive sheet
of the sheet-like test device of the present invention
include rayon fibers, polyester fibers, acrylic fibers,
Vinylon fibers, cotton fibers, glass fibers, and other
fibers made of a synthetic or natural material. Of these,
acrylic non-woven fabric is preferred in view of its high
liquid-absorptive characteristics. The liquid-absorptive
sheet preferably has a liquid absorption value of 0.020
g/cm2 or more, preferably 0.08-0.2 g/cm2.
The liquid absorption value of the present invention
is obtained in accordance with the following procedure,
which is a modification of a method of Crow
et al. (INDA-TEC,
207 (1991)).
1) A piece of sponge (made of polyurethane, 8.5 cm × 14 cm,
thickness 3 cm) which has been caused to sufficiently absorb
water in advance is immersed in a plate containing purified
water; 2) A test piece (1 cm × 1 cm) is placed on the water-soaked
sponge and another piece of sponge having the same size as
the first sponge is placed on the test piece; 3) The plate carrying the sandwiched test piece is placed
together with the plate in a humid box, allowed to stand at
room temperature (20-25°) for five hours, and then the
weight of the sample is measured; and 4) The weight of the sample before absorbing water is
subtracted from the weight of the sample after absorbing
water, to thereby determine the liquid absorption value.
The liquid-absorptive sheet used in the present
invention preferably has a thickness of 300-3000 µm,
particularly preferably 500-2000 µm. When the thickness is
less than 300 µm, a test liquid is not sufficiently retained
in liquid-absorptive sections, and therefore, accurate
measurement cannot be performed due to insufficient reaction.
In contrast, when the thickness is in excess of 3000 µm,
simplicity of the below-mentioned hydrophobicity treatment
will be lost.
The sheet-like test device of the present invention is
obtained through hydrophobicity treatment of the portions
other than the portions that function as liquid-absorptive
sections so that a plurality of liquid-absorptive sections
are formed separately from one another.
The hydrophobicity treatment is preferably conducted
by use of a print method; i.e., by allowing permeation of a
liquid containing as a predominant component a hydrophobic
resin into predetermined portions (other than liquid-absorptive
sections) of a liquid-absorptive sheet and drying.
Examples of the hydrophobic resins used in the present
invention include polyurethane resins, polyacrylic resins,
polyester resins, polyamide resins, polyvinyl chloride
resins, polystyrene resins, fluororesins, and other rubber-modified
products. Any of known resins that are
conventionally used, such as those employed as ink binders,
may be used so long as their water-solubility and moisture-absorptivity
are not excessively high. Solvents which may
be used to dissolve or disperse these hydrophobic resins are
selected from among a variety of organic solvents in
accordance with the hydrophobic resin employed, and examples
thereof include toluene or cyclohexanone. To the liquid
containing a hydrophobic resin (hydrophobic ink) as a
predominant component there may be added, according to needs,
additives such as a colorant; an inorganic or organic
filler; a water repellent such as a fluororesin or silicone;
a surfactant; or a viscosity-modifier.
In order to cause the hydrophobic ink to permeate into
the predetermined portions of a liquid-absorptive sheet,
typical silk screen printing is preferably performed.
Briefly, a hydrophobic ink is preferably applied onto the
predetermined portions of a liquid-absorptive sheet for
permeation and is subsequently subjected to drying. The
hydrophobic ink may be applied once, or preferably several
times, in order to ensure hydrophobicity treatment.
In order to cause the thus-applied hydrophobic ink to
sufficiently permeate into the liquid-absorptive sheet so as
to reach the backside thereof, any the following methods is
preferably performed: (1) a method in which a pressure is
applied to the ink-application surface of the sheet, (2) a
method in which a suction force is applied to the surface
opposite the ink-application surface of the sheet, (3) a
method in which air is blown on the side of the ink-application
surface of the sheet, or (4) a suitable
combination of two or more methods selected from among (1),
(2), and (3).
No particular limitation is imposed on the method (1);
i.e., application of pressure to the ink-application surface
of the sheet. For example, roll-pressing is preferred.
In this method, at least two rolls, e.g., a metal roll
having a mirror-polished surface and a rubber roll, are used
in combination and disposed one on the other. A
hydrophobic-ink-coated, liquid-absorptive sheet is inserted
therebetween so that the ink-application surface contacts
the metal roll. A pressure is continuously applied between
the two rolls while they are rotated.
In this case, the mirror-polished metal roll may be
heated. In the case in which the hydrophobic ink is not
completely dried, application of pressure alone may result
in permeation of the hydrophobic ink to the backside of the
liquid-absorptive sheet without additional heating.
When this method is used, no special metallic die of a
specific shape is needed, and the sheet may be easily
pressed with excellent productivity through regulation of
the rotational speed of the rolls and the distance between
the rolls or nip pressure.
Upon application of pressure, preferably a film which
does not absorb a hydrophobic ink is placed on the ink-application
surface of the liquid-absorptive sheet and an
absorptive material such as paper is preferably placed on
the surface opposite the ink-application surface of the
sheet. By this method, excessive ink that penetrates the
sheet onto the backside thereof under pressure can be
absorbed by the absorptive material, to thereby prevent the
ink from adhering to the rolls or overflowing on the liquid-absorptive
sheet.
As an alternative method for the application of a
pressure onto the ink-application surface of the liquid-absorptive
sheet, there may be employed a planar pressing
method, wherein an unheated or heated sheet which is flat in
its entirety or a sheet patterned in accordance with the
ink-application pattern of the hydrophobic ink is used.
When the planar pressing method is used, if the ink
applied onto the liquid-absorptive sheet is not completely
dried, the pressurizing plate may be at ambient temperature
as in the case of the above-described roll-pressing method.
However, when pressure is applied after the ink has dried,
the pressurizing plate must be heated so as to soften or
melt the hydrophobic ink.
When pressure is applied by use of a patterned
pressurizing plate, needless to say, the pressurizing plate
and the ink-application pattern of the liquid-absorptive
sheet must be pressed after being positioned accurately.
In this case also, upon application of pressure, if
the ink applied onto the liquid-absorptive sheet is not
completely dried, preferably a film which does not absorb a
hydrophobic ink is placed on the ink-application surface of
the liquid-absorptive sheet and an absorptive material such
as paper is placed on the surface opposite the ink-application
surface of the sheet.
In the case in which pressure is applied through use
of a heated planar plate after the applied ink has dried,
preferably the pressurizing planar plate and the pressure-receiving
surface are both subjected to mold-releasing
treatment of heat resistance so that the softened or molten
hydrophobic ink does not adhere to the pressurizing planar
plate and the pressure-receiving surface.
When the method (2); i.e., application of suction
force to the surface opposite the ink-application surface of
the sheet, is used in association with ink application means
adapted to the silk screen printing process, a vacuum-suction
device provided for securing the sheet for printing
to the printer itself may be used as is, and if necessary,
through adjustment of the diameters of the suction holes or
their arrangement pattern, suction force may be applied to
ink simultaneously with printing to thereby cause the ink to
permeate the sheet. When the printer has no vacuum suction
device, a separate but similar suction device may be
provided, with which suction force is applied to ink which
is not yet dry after printing to thereby permeate the sheet
with ink.
In the case of method (3); i.e., a method in which air
is blown on the side of the ink-application surface of the
sheet to thereby apply pressure for permeation of the ink,
ink may be caused to permeate into the sheet by placing the
ink-applied, liquid-absorptive sheet on a wire-net-like
receiving base and by applying air pressure onto the ink-application
surface of the sheet by use of a blower equipped
with a hood.
Furthermore, chambers of existing air-pressure/vacuum
molding machines for forming plastic sheets may also be
utilized. In this case, a separately provided receiving
base in the form of a wire net, instead of a female die for
molding, is attached to the inside of the chamber, and a
liquid-absorptive sheet to which ink has been applied is
placed on the receiving base. Subsequently, the chamber is
closed and air is discharged without the application of
vacuum. Pressure is applied onto the ink-application
surface by the feeding of compressed air, to thereby achieve
permeation of the ink.
When the combination of (2) and (3); i.e., feeding air
on the ink-application side and suction of air on the
opposite side, is employed, there may be used chambers of
existing air-pressure/vacuum molding machines described
above in connection with method (3). In this case also, a
wire net receiving base, which is used instead of a female
die for molding, is attached to the inside of the chamber,
and a liquid-absorptive sheet to which ink has been applied
is placed on the receiving base, followed by closure of the
chamber and simultaneous pressurization by application of
compressed air onto the ink-application surface and suction
by use of vacuum from the opposite side.
In typical air-pressure/vacuum molding machines, a
heating apparatus for heating plastic sheets and a molding
apparatus are disposed in line. However, since the above-described
methods (2) and (3) require no heating, a
pressurized-air or vacuum apparatus alone, which is
manufactured independently, may be connected downstream of a
silk screen printer which may be followed by an optional
drying apparatus if necessary, to thereby sequentially
perform application of ink, permeation of the ink, and
drying of the ink.
No particular limitation is imposed on the shapes and
sizes of liquid-absorptive sections remaining after
hydrophobicity treatment is performed, and they may be
selected according to the amount of a test liquid and the
degree of liquid absorption. Generally, preferable liquid-absorptive
sections are circular or square having, e.g., a
diameter or side length of approximately 0.2-1 cm. In this
case, the amount of the test liquid which is caused to be
absorbed by a single liquid-absorptive section is
approximately 0.025-0.2 ml in general.
No particular limitation is imposed on the number of
such liquid-absorptive sections, and it may arbitrarily be
determined through the volume of a test liquid, the number
of test items, etc.
In order to regulate the volume of liquid absorbed by
the liquid-absorptive sections, a material fixed with a
water-absorptive polymer may be used. Examples of the
water-absorptive polymers include soluble starch; mannan;
agar; sodium alginate; plant-derived polysaccharide (such as
Arabic gum); microbial polysaccharide (such as dextran,
xanthan gum, or Gellan gum); cellulose substances (such as
methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, or other species of
cellulose); polyvinyl alcohol; a polyacrylic acid sodium
salt; and graft copolymers thereof. Examples of techniques
for fixation of these water-absorptive polymers onto the
liquid-absorptive sections include dipping a printed liquid-absorptive
sheet in a liquid obtained by dissolving a water-absorptive
polymer in water, an organic solvent, etc. and
drying; and adding the above water-absorptive polymer liquid
dropwise to liquid-absorptive sections and drying.
The test device of the present invention includes the
aforementioned sheet-like test device and a diffusion
section which maintains contact with at least a portion of
each liquid-absorptive section and supplies a test liquid to
the liquid-absorptive section. The ratio of the liquid
absorption value in the liquid-absorptive sections to that
of the diffusion section (absorption/diffusion) is 2 or more,
preferably 5-15. When the ratio is less than 2, diffusion
of the test liquid into the diffusion section for causing
the absorptive sections to absorb the test liquid may become
difficult.
Example materials of the diffusion section are the
same as the materials listed for the liquid-absorptive sheet,
and cotton non-woven fabric is preferred in view of enhanced
diffusion characteristics and low liquid absorption.
Of these materials, preferred ones are those having a
liquid absorption value of 0.005-0.05 g/cm2, particularly
0.008-0.02 g/cm2, and a liquid diffusion rate, as determined
by time necessary for diffusion of water for an entirety of
a rectangular sheet (1 cm × 10 cm) when its shorter side is
dipped in purified water, of 15 minutes of less,
particularly preferably 30 seconds to 3 minutes.
The diffusion section used in the present invention is
provided to supply a test liquid and diffuse it to the
liquid-absorptive sections. No particular limitation is
imposed on the shape, size, and thickness of the diffusion
section, and they may be selected according to the liquid
absorption value of the test liquid applied to the liquid-absorptive
sections, the number of the liquid-absorptive
sections, etc. In general, the shape of the diffusion
section is preferably sheet-like, and those having a
thickness of approximately 0.05-0.6 mm are preferably used.
The liquid-absorptive sections of the above-described
sheet-like test device are arranged so as to contact the
diffusion section at least partially.
No particular limitation is imposed on the method of
fixation of the liquid-absorptive sections of the sheet-like
test device to the diffusion section. For example, there
may be employed a method in which liquid-absorptive sections
and part of the diffusion section are bonded by use of an
adhesive (e.g., a hydrophilic adhesive or a water-soluble
polymer); a method in which the liquid-absorptive sections
disposed on the diffusion section are partially bonded by
(heat) pressing; a method in which the diffusion section and
the liquid-absorptive sections are joined by seaming; and a
method in which the liquid-absorptive sections are inserted
into cuts provided in the diffusion section.
A more preferable embodiment of the test device of the
present invention is a sheet-like test device having a
plurality of liquid-absorptive sections, and in addition, at
the central location of a plurality of the liquid-absorptive
sections, a test-liquid supply hole, and also having a
diffusion section made of a liquid-diffusive sheet, wherein
the sheet-like test device is arranged such that the test-liquid
supply hole and a plurality of liquid-absorptive
sections are brought into communication with one another on
the diffusion section (See Fig. 1).
Further, the test device of the present invention is
preferably distributed as accommodated in a waterproof
casing. In a particularly preferable embodiment for the
accommodation of the device in a waterproof casing there are
provided a sheet-like test device having a waterproof bottom
part and a cover having holes corresponding to a plurality
of liquid-absorptive sections and a test liquid-supply hole
to possess a plurality of liquid-absorptive sections and a
test liquid-supply hole, wherein the diffusion section is a
liquid-diffusive sheet, and the sheet-like test device
arranged such that the test-liquid supply hole and a
plurality of liquid-absorptive sections are brought into
communication with one another on the diffusion section is
secured to the casing (See Fig. 2). Furthermore, the cover
preferably has an additional outer cover for distribution.
Examples of the water-resistant materials used as the
bottom part and the cover include plastic sheets made of
polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, etc.; and glass.
To conduct a test through use of the sheet-like test
device of the present invention, a test liquid is added
dropwise in a specific amount to each liquid-absorptive
section. The amount of the test liquid is determined
according to the area and liquid absorption value of the
liquid-absorptive sections.
To conduct a test by use of the test device of the
present invention, test liquid may be poured in a specific
amount to only one spot of the diffusion section, and the
test liquid thereby diffuses throughout the diffusion
section and is absorbed by a plurality of liquid-absorptive
sections. In the case of the above-described preferable
embodiment, test liquid may be added dropwise to the liquid-supply
holes provided in the liquid-absorptive sections.
The amount of the test liquid is determined in accordance
with the area, liquid absorption value, etc. of the
diffusion section and the liquid-absorptive sections.
In the present invention, test liquid absorbed by each
of the liquid-absorptive sections reacts with a variety of
reactive reagents. The reactive reagents may be contained
in a test device in advance or added after absorption of the
liquid. They are preferably contained in advance so that
tests may be performed quickly, so long as they do not raise
problems in respect to, for example, stability. No
particular limitation is imposed on the reactive reagents
used in the present invention, and examples include reagents
for measurement of enzyme activity such as coloring
substrates and fluorescent substrates; reagents for
identification of microorganisms, such as sugar, amino acids,
and fatty acids; reagents for measurement of drug
susceptibility of microorganisms against antibiotics, etc.;
and test reagents for antibacterial agents.
These reactive reagents may be fixed through addition
of a solution of the reagent to pre-sterilized liquid-absorptive
sections, and drying under reduced pressure. In
this case, the above-described water-absorptive polymer may
be added to the reactive reagent.
In the above-described manner, reactive reagents of
different species and different concentrations can be fixed
onto a plurality of liquid-absorptive sections of the test
device of the present invention. Therefore, multiple items
of reactions can be tested by a single trial. In this case,
the reactive reagent, e.g., L-alanine-p-nitroanilide or L-proline-β-naphthylamide,
which is a coloring substrate used
for measurement of enzyme activity in a test liquid (such as
suspension of bacteria, body fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, or
emulsified foodstuff), is preferably added in an amount of
0.01-0.5 wt.% based on the amount of the test liquid
absorbed in the liquid-absorptive sections. When a
fluorescent substrate such as 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-galactopyranoside
or L-alanine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin is
used as a reagent, a preferable amount of the reagent is
0.001-0.02 wt.% based on the amount of the test liquid
absorbed in the liquid-absorptive sections.
When sugar, amino acids, fatty acids, or their
intermediate metabolites are used as reagents for
identification of microorganisms, their amounts are
preferably 0.1-5 wt.% based on the amount of the test liquid
absorbed in liquid-absorptive sections. When antibiotics
are used as reagents for measurement of drug susceptibility
of microorganisms, or when antibacterial agents are used for
an antibacterial activity test, their concentrations may be
arbitrarily determined in accordance with the target drugs
and microorganisms of interest.
Moreover, gelling agents may also be added to liquid-absorptive
sections in order to increase the viscosity of an
absorbed test liquid to thereby obtain sufficient gel
strength at the liquid-absorptive sections. Examples of the
gelling agents include natural polymers such as xanthan gum,
carageenan, Gelan gum, Arabic gum, locust beam gum, guar gum,
tragacanth gum, or crystalline cellulose; and synthetic
polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol,
polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polyacrylamide,
polyacrylic acid, hydroxyethyl cellulose, or hydroxypropyl
cellulose.
These gelling agents may be fixed onto the liquid-absorptive
sections in a manner similar to that employed for
fixation of the above-described reagents. In this case,
they are preferably added in an amount of 0.1-1 wt.%
(natural polymer) or 0.05-0.5 wt.% (synthetic polymer) based
on the amount of the test liquid absorbed by the liquid-absorptive
sections.
Furthermore, nutrients such as peptone may be added
with an aim of culturing bacteria contained in the test
liquid, and cations such as alkali metal salts and alkaline
earth metal salts may be added to solutions of reagents so
as to increase the gel strength and reaction sensitivity;
thus, these components may be incorporated in the liquid-absorptive
sections.
In addition, other nutrients, surfactants, and cations
such as alkali metal salts may be added to test liquids.
EXAMPLES
The present invention will next be described in more
detail by way of examples. However, the present invention
should not be construed as being limited to thereto.
Example 1
The entire surface of a liquid-absorptive piece made
of acrylic nonwoven fabric (A-200; Kuraray Trading Co.,
Ltd.) having a thickness of 1000 µm was screen-printed with
an ink shown in Table 1 below and by a print method also
shown in Table 1 below, to thereby obtain a test device
having non-printed circular portions of 7.5 mm diameter.
Test on Sealing Effect by Printing with a Hydrophilic Ink;
The outer periphery (12 mm x 12 mm) of each of the
non-printed portions was cut to make samples for measuring
the liquid-absorption value.
With regard to the control sample, a piece (10 mm x 10
mm) was cut out from a non-printed liquid absorptive piece,
and the liquid-absorption value was measured.
The measurement was performed in accordance with the
method of Crow et al. For the control samples, data were
processed as follows: (Measured amount of liquid absorption)
x {(Surface area of 7.5mm ⊘) / (Area of 10mm x 10mm)}.
The results are shown in Table 1.
No. | Print method | Ink type | Liquid absorption (g/absorptive sections) | Ratio |
1 | F2B1 | Acrylic | 0.105 | 210% |
2 | F3 | Acrylic | 0.056 | 112% |
3 | F3 | Acryl + F | 0.049 | 98% |
4 | F2B1 | Acryl + F | 0.051 | 102% |
5 | F3 | Acryl + Si | 0.043 | 86% |
6 | F2B1 | Acryl + Si | 0.050 | 100% |
7 | F1B1 | Acryl + Si | 0.070 | 140% |
8 | F1 roll press | Acryl + F | 0.050 | 100% |
Control | - | - | 0.050 | 100% |
Ink type
Acrylic resin ...... Sericol 13 medium (Teikoku Ink Co.,
Ltd.)
Solvent ...... Sericol G-002 solvent (Teikoku Ink Co.,
Ltd.)
Fluorine ...... Comb-shaped polymer LFB-4015 (Soken Kagaku
K.K.)
Silicone ...... Comb-shaped polymer LSI-60 (Soken Kagaku
K.K.)
Mixing ratio
Acrylic |
Acrylic resin |
80 parts by weight |
Solvent |
20 parts by weight |
Acryl + Fluorine |
Acrylic resin |
80 parts by weight |
Solvent |
10 parts by weight |
Fluorine |
10 parts by weight |
Acryl + Silicon |
Acrylic resin |
85 parts by weight |
Solvent |
15 parts by weight |
Silicon |
10 parts by weight |
Print Method
Plate ... Number of lines: 70 mesh,
Thickness of resist: 90 µm
Printing (by a known screen print method)
F2B1: Printing was performed consecutively twice from
the front face, and subsequent to drying, once from the back
face.
F2 to F4: Consecutively twice to four times from the
front face.
F1B1: Once from the front face, drying, and once from
the back face.
Roll Press Method
After printing, each liquid-absorptive piece, with its
printed face upward, was sandwiched between an OPP film
placed on the upper side and a wiper placed on the lower
side and roll-pressed, to thereby cause the ink to penetrate.
As a result, preferable print methods could be
selected through measurement of the liquid absorption value.
Print methods identified as Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 in
Table 1 were found to be excellent methods.
Example 2
Liquid-absorptive pieces used in the test: Withe the
exception of twelve 7.5 mm⊘ non-printed portions, the
entirety of the surface of an acrylic nonwoven fabric (A-200
sheet) having a liquid absorption value of 0.114 g/cm2 was
subjected to uniform printing (print method No. 11).
Subsequently, the printed piece was punched to provide a 106
mm x 38 mm rectangular piece, and a 13 mm x 18 mm elliptic
hole was formed in its central portion by punching (Fig. 1).
Development layer: Through use of an adhesive (Coponyl
5404D, Nippon synthetic Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) a PET
film (thickness; 75 µm) was fixed to one side of a cotton
nonwoven fabric (PS-140, Asahi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.)
having a liquid absorption value of 0.008 g/cm2, and the
fabric was then processed into a 15 mm x 110 mm piece by
punching.
Liquid-impermeable base plate and cover: The base plate has
dimensions that permit accommodation of the above-mentioned
liquid-absorptive piece for testing and development layer.
The cover has openings corresponding to the positions of the
non-printed portions and the punched central portion.
Manufacture method: On the base plate were placed the
development layer, the control liquid-absorptive piece, and
the cover, in this order. Then, the control liquid-absorptive
piece and the development layer were secured in
place by the base plate placed above and the cover placed
below. In order to ensure fixture, the base plate and the
cover were fixed to each other with adhesive.
The development layer of the thus-obtained test device
is partially exposed at punched-through portions of the
liquid-absorptive piece. Therefore, when the test liquid is
added dropwise to such exposed portion(s), the test liquid
will reach the liquid-absorptive sections through the
development layer (Fig. 2).
Test Example 2
Through use of the test device obtained in Example 2,
tests were performed according to the following test method.
Also, comparative tests were performed by the microplate
method. The results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
Test method:
Bacterial strain provided for the test:
E.coli ATCC 11775, K.pneumoniae ATCC 13883
Reaction items and preparation method:
1. ALA : L-alanine-p-nitroanilide (product of SIGMA, 6mM
pH 7.0),
2. PNP : p-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (product of
SIGMA, 6mM pH 7.0),
3. PYR : Pyroglutamyl-β-naphthylamide (product of SIGMA,
3mM pH 7.0),
4. GLR : p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucronide (product of SIGMA,
6mM pH 7.0),
5. PHE : p-nitro-L-phenylalanine (product of SIGMA, 4mM pH
7.3),
6. PRO : Proline-β-naphthylamide (product of SIGMA, 3mM
pH 7.0),
7. IND : Tryptophan (product of Wako Pure Chemical
Industries, Ltd., 0.1% pH 7.4),
8. BGL : p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (product of
SIGMA, 6mM pH 6.3),
9. NGL : p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide
(product of SIGMA, 2mM pH 7.0),
10. NIT : KNO3 (product of Wako Pure Chemical Industries,
Ltd., 0.5% pH 7.0)
11. BIP : 5-Bromo-3-indolyl phosphate (product of Wako Pure
Chemical Industries, Ltd., 4mM pH 8.0)
12. XYL : p-nitrophenyl-β-xyloside (product of SIGMA, 6mM
pH 7.0)
For each of the above-mentioned items, a solution was
prepared to have the final substrate concentration shown in
corresponding parenthesis, and contain 0.5% pepteose peptone
(manufactured by DIFCO), 1% casein peptone (manufactured by
MARCOR Development Corp.), and 0.1% xanthan gum
(manufactured by San-Eigen F.F.I. Inc.). Each substrate
solution was sterilized and dispensed directly to a test
device in an amount of 50 µl x number of 7.5 mm⊘ non-printed
circular portions of the test device, and dried
under reduced pressure.
Also, for control, each substrate solution was added
dropwise to the wells of a microplate in an amount of 100 µl
per well, and immobilized likewise.
Culture test method and method for judgment:
Fresh bacteria were cultured in a sheep blood agar
culture media-N "Nissui" (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.)
for one day (18 to 24 hours), and suspended in a 0.1% gellan
gum (manufactured by MERCK) solution to make the turbidity
equivalent to that of a standard nephelometry liquid,
McFarland #0.5. The bacterium suspension (1 ml) was
supplied into each test device through the supply hole open
at the central portion thereof. In order to maintain the
sealing, a cover was put on the test device. The bacterium
suspension immediately diffused and was absorbed in the
circular non-printed sections within 6 minutes. The amount
of absorbed test liquid was 50 µl ± 10 µl.
To each well of the control microplate, the bacterium
suspension was added dropwise in an amount of 100 µl per
well through use of a pipette. After incubation at 37°C for
4 hours, positive(+)/negative(-) was visually determined
from the color developed in each substrate. For test item
Nos. 3, 6, 7, and 10, detection reagents (3, 6: a
cinnamaldehyde reagent (bioMerieux Vitek Inc.), 7: Kovac's
reagent (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), 10: nitrite
detection reagent I and nitrite detection reagent II (Nissui
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.)) were added dropwise in an amount
of 25 to 50 µl, and positive(+)/negative(-) was determined
after a lapse of 5 to 10 minutes.
As is apparent from the above tables, the method using
the test device of the present invention showed results
identical to those shown by the microplate method.
Therefore, through use of the test device of the present
invention in which a predetermined amount of test liquid is
poured into a single supply hole, can be performed simply
and expeditiously a test involving multiple reaction items.
Also, when the test device is overturned, the test liquid is
not spattered since the test liquid is sealed up in the
liquid-absorptive sections, thereby more effectively
securing safety in terms of biohazard as compared to
microplate-type devices.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY:
The test device of the present invention can be mass-produced
in an industrial advantageous manner, since it can
be manufactured through hydrophobicity treatment such as
printing using a hydrophobic ink. Further, if the test
device is additionally provided with a diffusion section,
there is no need to dispense a test liquid to each well as
in the case of conventional microplates. This is because
the test liquid is poured into a single site of the
diffusion section to be absorbed by each liquid-absorptive
section , so that a test is conducted simply and
expeditiously. Moreover, a test is conducted more
expeditiously because a reagent or the like needed for the
test can be contained in the absorptive sections in advance.