EP0683246A1 - Cleaning and passivation treatment for metals - Google Patents
Cleaning and passivation treatment for metals Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0683246A1 EP0683246A1 EP95301519A EP95301519A EP0683246A1 EP 0683246 A1 EP0683246 A1 EP 0683246A1 EP 95301519 A EP95301519 A EP 95301519A EP 95301519 A EP95301519 A EP 95301519A EP 0683246 A1 EP0683246 A1 EP 0683246A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- ion
- molybdate
- treatment solution
- borate ion
- imidazoline
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F11/00—Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
- C23F11/08—Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23G—CLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
- C23G1/00—Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
- C23G1/24—Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with neutral solutions
Definitions
- the present invention relates to cleaning and passivating treatments for metals. More particularly, the present invention relates to cleaning and passivating treatments for metals which are essentially free of amines, alkanolamines, and phosphates.
- the aqueous treatments of the present invention comprise amphoteric surfactants which were found to provide an excellent passivating film on ferrous surfaces.
- the amphoteric surfactants of the present invention are caprylic acid derivatives of imidazoline compounds.
- In process cleaners are employed in the metal treatment industry to clean and passivate a metal surface. These types of aqueous cleaners are typically based on organic rust-proofing or passivating agents such as combinations of alkanolamines and fatty acids, surfactants, anti-foam agents and/or phosphonates and possibly biocides and builders. In order to passivate a metal surface to prevent rusting during process breaks and storage, appropriate additives are used. Cleaning and passivating agents which inhibit the corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces contain for example alkali nitrites, alkanolamines, soaps and benzoates.
- Clean and passivate treatments are typically employed in applications which require good cleaning and temporary metal passivation. Treated parts may need to remain rust-free, while exposed in the manufacturing plant for from several hours up to 30 days. In order to maintain their rust prevention ability, these cleaners are not rinsed.
- Current commercial cleaners typically employ alkanolamines such as monoethanolamine, diethanolamine or triethanolamine as a passivating agent for ferrous surfaces. The alkanolamine component inhibits flash rusting of ferrous iron parts during line stops or storage.
- Typical cleaners also will include surfactants such as glycol ether compounds and phosphonate compounds which aid in cleaning of the parts.
- U.S. Patent No. 4,578,208 which issued to Geke et al. discloses a cleaning and/or passivating composition and process which employs a phosphoric acid ester, an alkanolamine and a surfactant and optionally builders, non-ferrous metal inhibitors and biocides.
- the present inventors discovered that a specific class of amphoteric surfactants provides excellent passivation of ferrous metals when substituted for alkanolamines.
- the use of amphoteric surfactants in accordance with the present invention obviates the need for amines, alkanolamines, phosphates and other currently environmentally undesirable materials in clean and passivate formulations.
- the inventors found that caprylic acid derivatives of imidazoline compounds provide efficacious passivation of ferrous metal surfaces.
- the treatment solution of the present invention is substantially free of amines, alkanolamines, and phosphates. By substantially free, it is meant that these materials are not intentionally added as active components of the treatment solution.
- the preferred treatment solution also includes small quantities of a borate ion and sodium molybdate. These compounds were found to allow reductions in the concentration of the amphoteric surfactant component without adversely affecting efficacy.
- a defoamer such as a nonionic surfactant may be desirable in spray applications.
- the present inventors discovered a clean and passivate treatment formulation for use in treating ferrous metal surfaces which is substantially free of amines, alkanolamines, and phosphates.
- the clean and passivate formulation of the present invention is an aqueous solution of a caprylic acid derivative of an imidazoline.
- the formulation preferably also includes a borate ion, sodium molybdate and a nonionic surfactant defoamer.
- the inventors found that aqueous solutions of caprylic acid derivatives of an imidazoline provide effective rust protection.
- amphoteric surfactants were used in combination with a borate ion and sodium molybdate significantly lower concentrations of the amphoteric surfactant could be employed with good rust inhibition results.
- the borate ion may be provided by a borate salt or by boric acid.
- the formulation of the present invention includes amphoteric surfactants which are caprylic acid derivatives of an imidazoline compound.
- the surfactants are present in the treatment solution at concentrations of from about 0.05% up to about 5% by weight.
- amphoteric surfactants include Monateric Cy-Na 50%, a sodium salt of 2-caprylic-1 (ethyl beta oxypropanoic acid) imidazoline; Monateric LF-100, a C5 ⁇ 9 methyl alkyl imidazoline; Monateric LF-Na 50, a sodium salt of LF-100 but 50% active; Monateric CYA-50, a capryl ampho-propionate; Monateric 1000, a capryl amphopropionate; and Miranol JAS concentrate which is a carboxylate derivative of capryl imidazoline.
- Miranol is a trademark of Rhone-Poulenc and Monateric is a trademark of Mona Industries.
- Amphopropionate is another name for imidazoline.
- the preferred treatment concentration is about 5% by weight.
- a caprylic acid derivative of an imidazoline is employed in the preferred combination which includes a borate ion (such as sodium metaborate octahydrate) and a molybdate ion (such as sodium molybdate)
- the concentration of the surfactant can be decreased to about 0.1 to 0.3% by weight.
- the preferred concentration of sodium molybdate is from about 0.1 to 0.5% by weight.
- the preferred concentration of sodium metaborate octahydrate is from about 0.1 to 0.5% by weight.
- the ratio of imidazoline to borate ion is from about 1:0.4 to 1.5 and the ratio of molybdate ion to imidazoline and borate ion is more than about 1:4
- the clean and passivate formulation of the present invention is typically supplied in two concentrate packages which are diluted and mixed prior to application.
- the first comprises the caprylic derivative of imidazoline compound; sodium molybdate and sodium metaborate octahydrate in deionized water.
- the second package comprises a nonionic surfactant defoaming agent.
- Efficacy of the treatment solution of the present invention was evaluated in a chip test evaluation.
- the test involved placing 4 g of cast iron chips on a filter paper in a plastic weighing dish, adding 50 ml of the test solution, allowing the solution to stand for 24 hours.
- the filter paper is rinsed with tap water and examined for rust spots. Refer to ASTM D4627-92.
- compositions and methods of the present invention are demonstrated by the following examples which are provided as illustrative and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
- amphoteric surfactants which are imidazoline compounds were tested in the above manner. Table I summarizes the results.
- Table II shows that efficacious results are obtained at a relatively low treatment concentration with the preferred combination of the present invention.
- Example 3 The presence of Macol LF 110 in the composition of Example 3 is included to inhibit foaming tendencies of the imidazoline surfactant. The presence of the defoamer does not effect the passivating activity of the imidazoline surfactant.
- Table IV summarizes chip testing as described above of a treatment in accordance with the present invention with and without a nonionic polyoxyalkylated aliphatic ether defoamer (Macol LF 110 available from PPG Industries, Inc.). TABLE IV Composition (grams/100 grams) Chip Test Monateric LF Na-50 NaBO2.8H20 Sodium Molybdate Water Macol LF 110 1. 0.075 0.37 0.075 99.48 ----- no rust spots 2. 0.075 0.37 0.075 99.44 0.04 no rust spots 3. 0.10 0.50 0.10 99.30 ----- no rust spots 4. 0.10 0.50 0.10 99.26 0.04 no rust spots
- the treatment solution of the present invention is preferably supplied as a concentrate which is diluted with deionized water to form a working bath.
- a preferred concentrate comprises 12.5% sodium metaborate octahydrate, 2.5% sodium molybdate, 5.0% Monateric LF-Na 50 and 80% deionized water.
- the Macol LF 110 defoamer is supplied separately.
- a 4% v/v dilution of the preferred concentrate with 0.04% v/v of Macol LF 110 results in the treatment solution described in Example 3. This preferred treatment solution has been found to be effective when diluted with DI, soft or hard water.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
- Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
- Cleaning And De-Greasing Of Metallic Materials By Chemical Methods (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to cleaning and passivating treatments for metals. More particularly, the present invention relates to cleaning and passivating treatments for metals which are essentially free of amines, alkanolamines, and phosphates. The aqueous treatments of the present invention comprise amphoteric surfactants which were found to provide an excellent passivating film on ferrous surfaces. The amphoteric surfactants of the present invention are caprylic acid derivatives of imidazoline compounds.
- "In process" cleaners are employed in the metal treatment industry to clean and passivate a metal surface. These types of aqueous cleaners are typically based on organic rust-proofing or passivating agents such as combinations of alkanolamines and fatty acids, surfactants, anti-foam agents and/or phosphonates and possibly biocides and builders. In order to passivate a metal surface to prevent rusting during process breaks and storage, appropriate additives are used. Cleaning and passivating agents which inhibit the corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces contain for example alkali nitrites, alkanolamines, soaps and benzoates.
- Clean and passivate treatments are typically employed in applications which require good cleaning and temporary metal passivation. Treated parts may need to remain rust-free, while exposed in the manufacturing plant for from several hours up to 30 days. In order to maintain their rust prevention ability, these cleaners are not rinsed. Current commercial cleaners typically employ alkanolamines such as monoethanolamine, diethanolamine or triethanolamine as a passivating agent for ferrous surfaces. The alkanolamine component inhibits flash rusting of ferrous iron parts during line stops or storage. Typical cleaners also will include surfactants such as glycol ether compounds and phosphonate compounds which aid in cleaning of the parts. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,578,208 which issued to Geke et al. discloses a cleaning and/or passivating composition and process which employs a phosphoric acid ester, an alkanolamine and a surfactant and optionally builders, non-ferrous metal inhibitors and biocides.
- Currently, environmental objections are being raised concerning the use of alkanolamines, phosphates and glycol ethers as raw materials for industrial processes.
- The present inventors discovered that a specific class of amphoteric surfactants provides excellent passivation of ferrous metals when substituted for alkanolamines. The use of amphoteric surfactants in accordance with the present invention obviates the need for amines, alkanolamines, phosphates and other currently environmentally undesirable materials in clean and passivate formulations. The inventors found that caprylic acid derivatives of imidazoline compounds provide efficacious passivation of ferrous metal surfaces. The treatment solution of the present invention is substantially free of amines, alkanolamines, and phosphates. By substantially free, it is meant that these materials are not intentionally added as active components of the treatment solution. The preferred treatment solution also includes small quantities of a borate ion and sodium molybdate. These compounds were found to allow reductions in the concentration of the amphoteric surfactant component without adversely affecting efficacy. In addition, a defoamer such as a nonionic surfactant may be desirable in spray applications.
- The present inventors discovered a clean and passivate treatment formulation for use in treating ferrous metal surfaces which is substantially free of amines, alkanolamines, and phosphates. The clean and passivate formulation of the present invention is an aqueous solution of a caprylic acid derivative of an imidazoline. The formulation preferably also includes a borate ion, sodium molybdate and a nonionic surfactant defoamer. The inventors found that aqueous solutions of caprylic acid derivatives of an imidazoline provide effective rust protection. It was further discovered that when such amphoteric surfactants were used in combination with a borate ion and sodium molybdate significantly lower concentrations of the amphoteric surfactant could be employed with good rust inhibition results. The borate ion may be provided by a borate salt or by boric acid.
- The formulation of the present invention includes amphoteric surfactants which are caprylic acid derivatives of an imidazoline compound. The surfactants are present in the treatment solution at concentrations of from about 0.05% up to about 5% by weight. Examples of commercially available amphoteric surfactants include Monateric Cy-Na 50%, a sodium salt of 2-caprylic-1 (ethyl beta oxypropanoic acid) imidazoline; Monateric LF-100, a C₅₋₉ methyl alkyl imidazoline; Monateric LF-Na 50, a sodium salt of LF-100 but 50% active; Monateric CYA-50, a capryl ampho-propionate; Monateric 1000, a capryl amphopropionate; and Miranol JAS concentrate which is a carboxylate derivative of capryl imidazoline. Miranol is a trademark of Rhone-Poulenc and Monateric is a trademark of Mona Industries. Amphopropionate is another name for imidazoline.
- When a caprylic acid derivative of an imidazoline is used alone, the preferred treatment concentration is about 5% by weight. When a caprylic acid derivative of an imidazoline is employed in the preferred combination which includes a borate ion (such as sodium metaborate octahydrate) and a molybdate ion (such as sodium molybdate), the concentration of the surfactant can be decreased to about 0.1 to 0.3% by weight. The preferred concentration of sodium molybdate is from about 0.1 to 0.5% by weight. The preferred concentration of sodium metaborate octahydrate is from about 0.1 to 0.5% by weight. The ratio of imidazoline to borate ion is from about 1:0.4 to 1.5 and the ratio of molybdate ion to imidazoline and borate ion is more than about 1:4
- The clean and passivate formulation of the present invention is typically supplied in two concentrate packages which are diluted and mixed prior to application. The first comprises the caprylic derivative of imidazoline compound; sodium molybdate and sodium metaborate octahydrate in deionized water. The second package comprises a nonionic surfactant defoaming agent.
- Efficacy of the treatment solution of the present invention was evaluated in a chip test evaluation. The test involved placing 4 g of cast iron chips on a filter paper in a plastic weighing dish, adding 50 ml of the test solution, allowing the solution to stand for 24 hours. The filter paper is rinsed with tap water and examined for rust spots. Refer to ASTM D4627-92.
- The effectiveness of the composition and method of the present invention is demonstrated by the following examples which are provided as illustrative and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
-
- The data in Table I shows that amphoteric surfactants which are caprylic acid derivatives of an imidazoline will provide chip protection while a C12-C14 fatty acid derivative of an imidazoline (Monateric CEM-38) does not provide such protection.
-
- The data in Table II shows that efficacious results are obtained at a relatively low treatment concentration with the preferred combination of the present invention.
- Monateric LF-Na 50 was tested in a treatment solution including sodium metaborate octahydrate, sodium molybdate and Macol LF 110 (a nonionic polyoxyalkylated aliphatic ether available from PPG Industries, Inc. which was added as a defoamer). The addition of the borate and molybdate was found to allow excellent passivation, i.e., no chip rusting, in the above described chip test with a relatively low concentration of amphoteric surfactant. The treatment solution tested is set out in Table III in weight percent.
TABLE III Sodium meta borate octahydrate 0.5% Sodium molybdate 0.1% Monateric LF-Na-50 0.1% as 100% actives Macol LF 110 0.04% - The presence of Macol LF 110 in the composition of Example 3 is included to inhibit foaming tendencies of the imidazoline surfactant. The presence of the defoamer does not effect the passivating activity of the imidazoline surfactant. Table IV summarizes chip testing as described above of a treatment in accordance with the present invention with and without a nonionic polyoxyalkylated aliphatic ether defoamer (Macol LF 110 available from PPG Industries, Inc.).
TABLE IV Composition (grams/100 grams) Chip Test Monateric LF Na-50 NaBO2.8H20 Sodium Molybdate Water Macol LF 110 1. 0.075 0.37 0.075 99.48 ----- no rust spots 2. 0.075 0.37 0.075 99.44 0.04 no rust spots 3. 0.10 0.50 0.10 99.30 ----- no rust spots 4. 0.10 0.50 0.10 99.26 0.04 no rust spots - For economies of shipping and handling, the treatment solution of the present invention is preferably supplied as a concentrate which is diluted with deionized water to form a working bath. A preferred concentrate comprises 12.5% sodium metaborate octahydrate, 2.5% sodium molybdate, 5.0% Monateric LF-Na 50 and 80% deionized water. The Macol LF 110 defoamer is supplied separately. A 4% v/v dilution of the preferred concentrate with 0.04% v/v of Macol LF 110 results in the treatment solution described in Example 3. This preferred treatment solution has been found to be effective when diluted with DI, soft or hard water.
- While the present invention has been described with respect to particular embodiments thereof, it is apparent that numerous other forms and modifications of this invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art. The appended claims and this invention generally should be construed to cover all such obvious forms and modifications which are within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Claims (8)
- A cleaning and passivating treatment solution for ferrous metal surface comprising an essentially amine; alkanol amine and phosphate free aqueous solution of (a) from about 0.05 to 5.0% by weight of a caprylic acid derivative of imidazoline amphoteric surfactant, (b) a borate ion and (c) a molybdate ion wherein the ratio of imidazoline amphoteric surfactant to borate ion is from about 1:0.4 to 1:5 and the ratio of sodium molybdate to imidazoline amphoteric surfactant and borate ion is more than about 1:4.
- A treatment solution as claimed in claim 1, wherein said borate ion is provided by sodium metaborate octahydrate.
- A treatment solution as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein said molybdate ion is provided by sodium molybdate.
- A treatment solution as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein said treatment solution further includes a nonionic surfactant defoaming agent.
- A method of cleaning and passivating a ferrous metal surface comprising contacting the ferrous metal surface with an aqueous treatment solution comprising (a) from about 0.05 to 5.0% by weight of a caprylic acid derivative of imidazoline amphoteric surfactant, (b) a borate ion, and (c) a molybdate ion wherein the ratio of imidazoline amphoteric surfactant to borate ion is from about 1:0.4 to 1:5 and the ratio of sodium molybdate to imidazoline amphoteric surfactant and borate ion is more than about 1:4.
- A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein said borate ion is provided by sodium metaborate octahydrate.
- A method as claimed in claim 5 or 6, wherein said molybdate ion is provided by sodium molybdate.
- A method as claimed in any of claims 5 to 7, wherein said treatment solution further includes a nonionic surfactant defoaming agent.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US24655094A | 1994-05-20 | 1994-05-20 | |
US246550 | 1994-05-20 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0683246A1 true EP0683246A1 (en) | 1995-11-22 |
EP0683246B1 EP0683246B1 (en) | 2000-07-19 |
Family
ID=22931164
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP95301519A Expired - Lifetime EP0683246B1 (en) | 1994-05-20 | 1995-03-08 | Cleaning and passivation treatment for metals |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0683246B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE194858T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2143471A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69518036T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2148433T3 (en) |
PT (1) | PT683246E (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102797004A (en) * | 2012-08-23 | 2012-11-28 | 李征 | Environmentally-friendly non-ferrous metal surface treating agent and preparation method thereof |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1133385A (en) * | 1966-03-18 | 1968-11-13 | Fuji Iron & Steel Company Ltd | Storage of corrodible metals |
US4450088A (en) * | 1983-05-19 | 1984-05-22 | Basf Wyandotte Corporation | Corrosion inhibited alcohol compositions |
EP0124851A2 (en) * | 1983-05-07 | 1984-11-14 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien | Composition and process for metal cleaning and passivation by spraying |
EP0229440A1 (en) * | 1985-12-27 | 1987-07-22 | Texaco Development Corporation | Monobasic-dibasic acid/salt antifreeze corrosion inhibitor |
EP0328872A1 (en) * | 1988-02-22 | 1989-08-23 | Pacific Gas and Electric Company | Corrosion inhibition of closed cooling water auxiliary system for nuclear power plants |
EP0552988A1 (en) * | 1992-01-21 | 1993-07-28 | BP Chemicals Limited | Antifreeze composition |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4759847A (en) * | 1983-12-05 | 1988-07-26 | Medbury Seward J | Filter for the sorption of a petroleum product from a liquid |
-
1995
- 1995-02-27 CA CA002143471A patent/CA2143471A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1995-03-08 AT AT95301519T patent/ATE194858T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1995-03-08 PT PT95301519T patent/PT683246E/en unknown
- 1995-03-08 EP EP95301519A patent/EP0683246B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-03-08 DE DE69518036T patent/DE69518036T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-03-08 ES ES95301519T patent/ES2148433T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1133385A (en) * | 1966-03-18 | 1968-11-13 | Fuji Iron & Steel Company Ltd | Storage of corrodible metals |
EP0124851A2 (en) * | 1983-05-07 | 1984-11-14 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien | Composition and process for metal cleaning and passivation by spraying |
US4578208A (en) * | 1983-05-07 | 1986-03-25 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien | Compositions and processes for cleaning and passivating metals |
US4450088A (en) * | 1983-05-19 | 1984-05-22 | Basf Wyandotte Corporation | Corrosion inhibited alcohol compositions |
EP0229440A1 (en) * | 1985-12-27 | 1987-07-22 | Texaco Development Corporation | Monobasic-dibasic acid/salt antifreeze corrosion inhibitor |
EP0328872A1 (en) * | 1988-02-22 | 1989-08-23 | Pacific Gas and Electric Company | Corrosion inhibition of closed cooling water auxiliary system for nuclear power plants |
EP0552988A1 (en) * | 1992-01-21 | 1993-07-28 | BP Chemicals Limited | Antifreeze composition |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102797004A (en) * | 2012-08-23 | 2012-11-28 | 李征 | Environmentally-friendly non-ferrous metal surface treating agent and preparation method thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
PT683246E (en) | 2000-11-30 |
ATE194858T1 (en) | 2000-08-15 |
CA2143471A1 (en) | 1995-11-21 |
EP0683246B1 (en) | 2000-07-19 |
DE69518036T2 (en) | 2001-03-22 |
DE69518036D1 (en) | 2000-08-24 |
ES2148433T3 (en) | 2000-10-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4113498A (en) | Corrosion inhibitor for metal surfaces | |
CA1118660A (en) | Process of cleaning metals by the spray method | |
EP0643127B1 (en) | Processes and compositions for improving the mobility of aluminium cans when conveyed by automatic conveying equipment | |
EP0533803B1 (en) | Acidic liquid composition and process for cleaning aluminum | |
US4578208A (en) | Compositions and processes for cleaning and passivating metals | |
CN107904611B (en) | It prevents from being superimposed environmental protection, low-residual cleaning anti-rust agent of rust of looking unfamiliar and preparation method thereof | |
US4174290A (en) | Metal oxide remover containing a strong mineral acid, citric acid and a basic ammonia derivative | |
US4437898A (en) | Method and agent for passivating iron and steel surfaces | |
CN115161648B (en) | Ultrahigh-pressure aluminum part cleaning agent and preparation method and application thereof | |
EP0180561A1 (en) | A method for mechanically working cobalt-containing metal, and a concentrate suitable, after dilution with water, for use in said method | |
US5668096A (en) | Cleaning and passivating treatment for metals | |
EP0376367A1 (en) | Aqueous cleaning agent for metal surfaces | |
CN110564522A (en) | Phosphorus-free cleaning agent | |
NZ204711A (en) | Compositions for protecting metal surfaces against corrosion containing carboxylic acids | |
EP0683246B1 (en) | Cleaning and passivation treatment for metals | |
US5468412A (en) | Low foaming aqueous cleaning and passivating treatment for metals | |
EP1115817B1 (en) | Mechanical working in the presence of a metal containing copper or aluminium | |
US4940493A (en) | Aluminum cleaning composition and process | |
JP2838115B2 (en) | Rust prevention composition for metal | |
EP1115816B1 (en) | A method for mechanical working in the presence of a cobalt-containing metal | |
US6524396B1 (en) | Agent and method for machining metal and for cleaning metal or anticorrosion treatment | |
US5494594A (en) | Metal surface treatments | |
US6458320B1 (en) | Galvanized metal corrosion inhibitor | |
JPS61117288A (en) | Corrosion inhibitor for iron and iron alloy | |
US4941925A (en) | Cleaner for high pressure cleaning of ferrous and non-ferrous material |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE DE ES FR GB IE IT NL PT |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19960305 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19960418 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: BETZDEARBORN EUROPE, INC. |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE DE ES FR GB IE IT NL PT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20000719 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20000719 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 194858 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 20000815 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69518036 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20000824 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2148433 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20000817 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20010308 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20030221 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20030228 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20030305 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20030310 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20030331 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20030408 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040308 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040331 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *BETZDEARBORN EUROPE INC. Effective date: 20040331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041015 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: MM4A Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES Effective date: 20040930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20050308 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20040309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040308 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230521 |