[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0618978A1 - In vitro antibody production - Google Patents

In vitro antibody production

Info

Publication number
EP0618978A1
EP0618978A1 EP93900274A EP93900274A EP0618978A1 EP 0618978 A1 EP0618978 A1 EP 0618978A1 EP 93900274 A EP93900274 A EP 93900274A EP 93900274 A EP93900274 A EP 93900274A EP 0618978 A1 EP0618978 A1 EP 0618978A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cells
antigen
support
immunization
antibodies
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP93900274A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Stephen Paul Bourne
Christopher John Popham
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
IMMUNE SYSTEMS Ltd
Original Assignee
IMMUNE SYSTEMS Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by IMMUNE SYSTEMS Ltd filed Critical IMMUNE SYSTEMS Ltd
Publication of EP0618978A1 publication Critical patent/EP0618978A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies

Definitions

  • This invention relates to in vitro antibody production, and in particular monoclonal antibody production.
  • IgM antibodies are of relatively low affinity and are of limited general application compared to antibodies of the IgG or IgA structural type or class.
  • Human monoclonal antibodies offer the advantage of minimizing the adverse reactions which can result from the administration of foreign (i.e rodent) antibody protein to the human body.
  • routine human monoclonal antibody production is not common because of the dangers and ethical problems of immunizing humans with certain antigens and the difficulty of collecting suitable primed B cells.
  • Recent efforts with human monoclonal antibodies produced by in vivo immunisation have focused on the use of chemical molecular modification to change specificities.
  • vitro immunization include (1) the ability to maintain specific concentrations of antigen during the immunization, (2) the effect of various monokines and lymphokines (cytokines) at various concentrations can be tested, (3) periodic sampling of the same culture is possible during the course of a culture, (4) it is possible to produce antibodies to "self" antigens which are not produced .in vitro due to suppression or tolerance, (5) use of very small quantities (compared to in vivo) of antigen, (6) potential for use of antigens toxic in vivo, (7) short time course with respect to in vivo; (8)enhanced yield of IgA with respect to in vivo immunisation; (9) antigens which are very small, such as some peptides, can be successfully used for immunization; and (10) the undesirable use of laboratory animals can be reduced.
  • cytokines monokines and lymphokines
  • Reading J. Im unological Methods .53. (1982) 261-291 reviews in vitro immunization and describes a method of in vitro immunization in which spleen cells from an unprimed mouse are mixed with thymocyte conditioned medium. Thymocyte conditioned medium contains monokines and lymphokines and other factors. A disadvantage of this technique is that the antibodies produced are predominantly IgM and low affinity IgG. W091/17769 discloses a method of in vitro immunisation using human lymphocytes and essential of autologous accessory cells which are immunized with a specific antigen under specific culture conditions. Relatively large quantities of IgG antibodies with improved affinities are said to be produced by this method. The use of human cells for immunization only,however, is disclosed. In a preferred embodiment the cells to be immunized and the accessory _ells are primed together with the antigen of interest prio,. to immunization proper.
  • WO 89/05308 discloses a method of in vitro immunisation based on the Reading paper referred to above, in which mouse spleen cells, for example, Balb/c- mouse spleen cells, are isolated without separating the B and T lymphocytes, an oligopeptide with a particular sequence or a hapten is immobilized and contacted with the mouse spleen cells, in the presence of Ewing Sarcoma Growth Factor and anti-L3/T4 monoclonal antibodies.
  • mouse spleen cells for example, Balb/c- mouse spleen cells
  • an oligopeptide with a particular sequence or a hapten is immobilized and contacted with the mouse spleen cells, in the presence of Ewing Sarcoma Growth Factor and anti-L3/T4 monoclonal antibodies.
  • PCT/SE89/00486 discloses a method of in vitro immunisation in which a lymphocyte containing cell population is contacted with a lysomotropic agent to remove cells having a negative effect on immunisation and subsequently the lymphocytes are immunized with an antigen in the presence of a polyclonal activator. Increased yield of IgG and antigen-sensitive hybridomae are claimed. According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a method of in vitro immunization of cells with an antigen to produce antibodies against that antigen, the method comprising incubating the cells in vitro with the antigen and support cells which have previously been contacted with the antigen.
  • the cells to be immunized are human cells but cells from other species ,such as mice may also be used.
  • An advantage of non-human systems is that syngeneic support cells can be used.
  • the method of the invention results in the production of as much as 67% IgG (using Keyhole Limpet Haemocyanin as the antigen),but typically about 55% r according to the antigen used.
  • IgA proportions of as high as 16% have been obtained and are typically in the range of 5-15%. It will be appreciated that a person of ordinary skill in the art may be able to obtain higher proportions of IgG or IgA antibodies on the basis of the present disclosure.
  • the support cells express antigen on the cell surface membrane in a form which facilitates presentation of the antigen to the cells to be immunized.
  • Support cells may also secrete cytokines active on the cells to be immunized and contact between the cells may also be important.
  • the method of the invention is simple to operate; is sensitive to nanograms of antigen and can generate responses to weak or conserved antigens within 1 week from priming of support cells , to yield screened hybridoma lines within 3-4 weeks.Even better response times may be obtained by use of extended immunization and/or repeated immunizations.
  • the method of the invention has been used to generate antibodies to snake venom toxin with improved results compared to in vivo techniques.
  • the method of the invention is further advantageous in that it does not require the use of purified adjuvants or polyclonal activators,cytokines or monokines, such as interleukins, required by prior art methods.
  • the support cells are preferably incubated in vitro with the antigen.
  • the support cells will be antigen-presenting cells, preferably macrophages, dendritic cells or other cells of the granulocyte macrophage lineage or derivatives.
  • Other support cells include Glial cells such as astrocytes,microglial cells, orepithelial cells,erythrocytes,B and T lymphocytes, Muller cells, Kupffer cells, fibroblasts, neoplastic cells. Derivatives, such as drug-resistant variants or hybrids of the above cells may also be used as support cells.
  • Such support cells may be manipulated to yield a stable reproducible ,immortal line which is in addition susceptible to selection, agents or treatment such as radiation which may be used to select during the immunization process and/or kill these support cells after complete immunization.
  • a system for cell toxicity may be for example selection of cells deficient in the enzyme hyp ⁇ xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl- transferase (Lloyd Mayer M: Human Hybridoma and Monoclonal antibodies, ed. Engleman et al Plenum Press, New York 1985.)
  • the cells to be immunized may be any cell capable of antibody production and are preferably splenocytes or derivatives, bone marrow-derived or peripheral blood lymphocytes or derivatives. As noted above the cells may be human or other species derived. Thus the method of the invention is not limited to any tissue- specific lymphocyte.
  • the cells to be immunized may be incubated in vitro with the primed support cells in growth factor, preferably thymocyte, conditioned medium.
  • growth factor preferably thymocyte, conditioned medium.
  • the method of the invention produces relatively large quantities of IgA antibodies compared to conventional in vivo immunisation methods.
  • the method of the invention provides a simple process for IgA production.
  • antibodies produced by a method in accordance with the inventio .
  • a kit for the use in a method in accordance with the invention for in vitro immunization of cells with an antigen comprising support cells, and support cell growth medium, and growth medium (immunization medium) for cells to be immunized.
  • the antigen is prepared.
  • a monolayer or suspension of support cells is established and primed with the chosen antigen.
  • a suspension of the cells to be immunized preferably spleen cells (splenocytes)
  • the cells to be immunized are incubated in the immunization medium with the chosen antigen and preprinted support cells. The procedure is summarised on the accompanying flow chart.
  • support cells are prepared (1), grown in a monolayer (2) for about 24 hours.
  • Separately antigen responsive cells eg spleen cells, are prepared (3), suspended (4) and pelleted (5).
  • the medium of the support cells is replaced (6) and antigen is added and the support cells are incubated with the antigen, typically for two days (8) , prior to combing the primed support cells with the antigen responsive cells and optionally adding further antigen (9) .
  • the cells are incubated undisturbed, typically for 3 days (10) prior to use in hybridoma production.
  • the antigen must first be prepared in a suitable form. If the antigen is possibly cytotoxic, a cell toxicity test is advised. The effect of addition of the preparation at the recommended concentration for in vitro immunization (30 ⁇ g in 30 ml) to a healthy culture of myeloma cells is a suitable test.
  • a maximum of 30 ⁇ g of antigen in a volume of 0.3 ml is required for in vitro immunization, with a similar amount required to prime the support cells.
  • Antigen concentrations of as little as lng per ml medium have been successfully used, and the preferred concentrations are in the range 50 ng to 1 ⁇ g per ml in the immunization medium. The optimum concentration varies according to the nature of the antigen.
  • the antigen should ideally be prepared in a sterile form. Working from a sterile lyophilised preparation or a solid, the antigen can be dissolved directly in 0.2 ml of phosphate buffered saline or tissue culture medium in aseptic conditions.
  • the antigen is already in solution, for example if it has been prepared biochemically, then it should be tested for sterility.
  • Working in aseptic conditions 0.2 ml of the antigen solution is added to a vial of sterility test broth. The vial is sealed tightly and shaken to mix and then incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. After this time, solutions which are contaminated will have a cloudy suspension. A clear solution indicates a sterile antigen preparation.
  • a suspension of the antigen is prepared, and pelleted by centrifugation and washed free of growth medium components as necessary.
  • the pellet is resuspended in 1ml of 0.15% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes.
  • PBS phosphate buffered saline
  • the suspension is re-pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in 5ml of a sterile solution of bovine serum albumin in PBS. This blocking step is necessary to prevent other non-specific proteins from binding to the fixed material.
  • the suspension is incubated for 90 minutes at room temperature and pelleted and resuspended in 0.2ml sterile splenocyte medium.
  • Antigens particularly relatively small antigens, or antigens which are immiscible with the cell culture medium, may be bound to a carrier substance or a solid matrix to enhance presentation to support cells.
  • Suitable carriers include molecules such as Bovine Serum Albu_ ⁇ in(BSA) or Keyhole Limpet Haemocyanin (KLH) or macroscopic carriers such as latex beads or nitrocellulose.
  • support cell medium is pipetted into a 25 cm 2 flask.
  • Sterile support cells are obtained and transferred to a laminar flow cabinet.
  • Preferred support cells are from a Balb/c urine macrophage- derived cell line, J774A.1, A.T.C.C accession No TIE-,-.7.
  • a non-renewable source of peritoneal macrophages may be used.
  • the cells are pipetted into the flask. Vented flasks are preferred.
  • the support cell medium Eagle's minimal essential medium, alpha modification with ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 072-01900) and 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 013-06290) is typically used.
  • the flask is capped and placed in an incubator and left undisturbed for 24 hours. Using aseptic technique,- the medium is removed by pipette from the 25 cm 2 flask and discarded. 5ml of fresh support cell medium is gently added to the flask and 20-30 ⁇ g of the sterile antigen is added.
  • Thymocyte conditioned media is prepared in advance as set out below.
  • thymuses typically from 4 x C57 Black 6 and 4 x BALB/c strains of mice in Dulbecco's Modified Minimal Essential Medium (Gibco Life Technologies Cat No. 074-02100 Appendix 2) with the recommended concentration of sodium hydrogen carbonate, (DMEM) + 10% rabbit serum, (Sigma R4505) keeping cell strains separate. Centrifuge and resuspend in DMEM + 2% Rabbit serum + 1% Non-essential amino acid solution (Sigma Cat. No. M7145) and 1% sodium pyruvate (Sigma Cat. No. S8636).
  • DMEM sodium hydrogen carbonate
  • Thymocyte conditioned medium 6 ml fetal calf serum
  • tissue culture medium typically Eagles MEM alpha modificationwithout ribonucleosides, deoxyribonucleosides, (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 072-02000 with NaHC0 3 as per manufacturer's recommendations) or fetal calf serum.
  • tissue culture medium typically Eagles MEM alpha modificationwithout ribonucleosides, deoxyribonucleosides, (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 072-02000 with NaHC0 3 as per manufacturer's recommendations
  • fetal calf serum 8 ml tissue culture medium (typically Eagles MEM alpha modificationwithout ribonucleosides, deoxyribonucleosides, (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 072-02000 with NaHC0 3 as per manufacturer's recommendations) or fetal calf serum.
  • ⁇ mercaptoethanol to final concentration of l ⁇ M, and aliquot into sterile bottles. Freeze at - 20°C.
  • the immunization medium is thawed at room temperature.
  • the spleen is removed from a 10-12 week old mouse (typically balb ⁇ c).
  • the spleen capsule is ruptured and the spleen is teased apart into small pieces, forming a crude suspension. This is then disrupted to form a single cell suspension.
  • the cell suspension is pipetted into a centrifuge tube and spun at 400xg approximately for 5 minutes.
  • the flask of support cells is removed from the incubator to a laminar flow cabinet.
  • the medium is aspirated from the flask.
  • 5ml of fresh support cell medium is used to rinse the support cells.
  • the medium is aspirated from the support cells.
  • the supernatant from the spleen cell pellet is discarded by pipetting, and the pellet is resuspended in 5ml immunization medium and transferred to the flask containing the support cells.
  • the remaining immunization medium is added to the flask.
  • the sterile antigen preparation is added to the flask.
  • the cap of the flask is fully tightened and the flask is placed with its 25 cm 2 growing surface horizontal in the incubator undisturbed for up to five days.
  • Immunization is not recommended to extend beyond 4 days as there is a rapid decline in cell viability due to medium exhaustion and cell fusion efficiency is reduced. After this time the primed splenocyte culture is ready for further processing as required. For preparation of antibody secreting hybridomas by fusion to a myeloma cell line or other form of immortalization is recommended.
  • the method of the invention provides enhanced presentation of antigen via support cells which may also secrete factors active on the cells being immunized resulting in an increased proportion of antibodies of the IgG and/or IgA type or class.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention se rapporte à un procédé d'immunisation in vitro de cellules avec un antigène, de façon à produire des anticorps contre ledit antigène. Le procédé comprend l'incubation des cellules avec l'antigène et avec des cellules de support, lesquelles ont déjà été amorcées par l'antigène avant leur incubation avec les cellules à immuniser.The invention relates to a process for the in vitro immunization of cells with an antigen, so as to produce antibodies against said antigen. The method includes incubating the cells with the antigen and with carrier cells, which have already been primed with the antigen prior to their incubation with the cells to be immunized.

Description

IN VITRO ANTIBODY PRODUCTION
This invention relates to in vitro antibody production, and in particular monoclonal antibody production.
Since the work of Milstein _ Kδhler the priming of rodent B cells with antigens has largely been accomplished by animal immunization. .In vitro immunization, that is to say a tissue culture-based primary system which permits rapid primary activation of antigen-specific cells has hitherto seldom been used because the resulting hybridomas produce antibodies which are predominately of the IgM structural type or class. IgM antibodies are of relatively low affinity and are of limited general application compared to antibodies of the IgG or IgA structural type or class.
Human monoclonal antibodies offer the advantage of minimizing the adverse reactions which can result from the administration of foreign (i.e rodent) antibody protein to the human body. However, routine human monoclonal antibody production is not common because of the dangers and ethical problems of immunizing humans with certain antigens and the difficulty of collecting suitable primed B cells. Recent efforts with human monoclonal antibodies produced by in vivo immunisation have focused on the use of chemical molecular modification to change specificities.
SUBSTITUTESHEET Therefore there is a need for an efficient method for in vitro immunization which results in an increased yield of IgG/IgA antibodies.
Further advantages of jLn, vitro immunization include (1) the ability to maintain specific concentrations of antigen during the immunization, (2) the effect of various monokines and lymphokines (cytokines) at various concentrations can be tested, (3) periodic sampling of the same culture is possible during the course of a culture, (4) it is possible to produce antibodies to "self" antigens which are not produced .in vitro due to suppression or tolerance, (5) use of very small quantities (compared to in vivo) of antigen, (6) potential for use of antigens toxic in vivo, (7) short time course with respect to in vivo; (8)enhanced yield of IgA with respect to in vivo immunisation; (9) antigens which are very small, such as some peptides, can be successfully used for immunization; and (10) the undesirable use of laboratory animals can be reduced.
Reading (J. Im unological Methods .53. (1982) 261-291) reviews in vitro immunization and describes a method of in vitro immunization in which spleen cells from an unprimed mouse are mixed with thymocyte conditioned medium. Thymocyte conditioned medium contains monokines and lymphokines and other factors. A disadvantage of this technique is that the antibodies produced are predominantly IgM and low affinity IgG. W091/17769 discloses a method of in vitro immunisation using human lymphocytes and essential of autologous accessory cells which are immunized with a specific antigen under specific culture conditions. Relatively large quantities of IgG antibodies with improved affinities are said to be produced by this method. The use of human cells for immunization only,however, is disclosed. In a preferred embodiment the cells to be immunized and the accessory _ells are primed together with the antigen of interest prio,. to immunization proper.
WO 89/05308 discloses a method of in vitro immunisation based on the Reading paper referred to above, in which mouse spleen cells, for example, Balb/c- mouse spleen cells, are isolated without separating the B and T lymphocytes, an oligopeptide with a particular sequence or a hapten is immobilized and contacted with the mouse spleen cells, in the presence of Ewing Sarcoma Growth Factor and anti-L3/T4 monoclonal antibodies.
PCT/SE89/00486 discloses a method of in vitro immunisation in which a lymphocyte containing cell population is contacted with a lysomotropic agent to remove cells having a negative effect on immunisation and subsequently the lymphocytes are immunized with an antigen in the presence of a polyclonal activator. Increased yield of IgG and antigen-sensitive hybridomae are claimed. According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a method of in vitro immunization of cells with an antigen to produce antibodies against that antigen, the method comprising incubating the cells in vitro with the antigen and support cells which have previously been contacted with the antigen.
Preferably the cells to be immunized are human cells but cells from other species ,such as mice may also be used. An advantage of non-human systems is that syngeneic support cells can be used.
It has been found that the method of the invention results in the production of as much as 67% IgG (using Keyhole Limpet Haemocyanin as the antigen),but typically about 55% r according to the antigen used. IgA proportions of as high as 16% have been obtained and are typically in the range of 5-15%. It will be appreciated that a person of ordinary skill in the art may be able to obtain higher proportions of IgG or IgA antibodies on the basis of the present disclosure.
Whilst not wishing to be bound by the theory, it is believed that the support cells express antigen on the cell surface membrane in a form which facilitates presentation of the antigen to the cells to be immunized. Support cells may also secrete cytokines active on the cells to be immunized and contact between the cells may also be important. The method of the invention is simple to operate; is sensitive to nanograms of antigen and can generate responses to weak or conserved antigens within 1 week from priming of support cells , to yield screened hybridoma lines within 3-4 weeks.Even better response times may be obtained by use of extended immunization and/or repeated immunizations.
The method of the invention has been used to generate antibodies to snake venom toxin with improved results compared to in vivo techniques.
The method of the invention is further advantageous in that it does not require the use of purified adjuvants or polyclonal activators,cytokines or monokines, such as interleukins, required by prior art methods.
The support cells are preferably incubated in vitro with the antigen. Typically the support cells will be antigen- presenting cells, preferably macrophages, dendritic cells or other cells of the granulocyte macrophage lineage or derivatives. Other support cells include Glial cells such as astrocytes,microglial cells, orepithelial cells,erythrocytes,B and T lymphocytes, Muller cells, Kupffer cells, fibroblasts, neoplastic cells. Derivatives, such as drug-resistant variants or hybrids of the above cells may also be used as support cells. Such support cells may be manipulated to yield a stable reproducible ,immortal line which is in addition susceptible to selection, agents or treatment such as radiation which may be used to select during the immunization process and/or kill these support cells after complete immunization. Such a system for cell toxicity may be for example selection of cells deficient in the enzyme hypαxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl- transferase (Lloyd Mayer M: Human Hybridoma and Monoclonal antibodies, ed. Engleman et al Plenum Press, New York 1985.)
The cells to be immunized may be any cell capable of antibody production and are preferably splenocytes or derivatives, bone marrow-derived or peripheral blood lymphocytes or derivatives. As noted above the cells may be human or other species derived. Thus the method of the invention is not limited to any tissue- specific lymphocyte.
In a murine system the cells to be immunized may be incubated in vitro with the primed support cells in growth factor, preferably thymocyte, conditioned medium.
It has been surprisingly found that the method of the invention produces relatively large quantities of IgA antibodies compared to conventional in vivo immunisation methods. Thus the method of the invention provides a simple process for IgA production.
According to another aspect of the invention there are provided antibodies produced by a method in accordance with the inventio . According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a kit for the use in a method in accordance with the invention for in vitro immunization of cells with an antigen, the kit comprising support cells, and support cell growth medium, and growth medium (immunization medium) for cells to be immunized.
An in, vitro immunization method in accordance with the invention and antibodies produced using the method will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawing which is a flow diagram illustrating the method.
There are typically 4 stages in the in. vitro immunization process. First, the antigen is prepared. Second, a monolayer or suspension of support cells is established and primed with the chosen antigen. Third, a suspension of the cells to be immunized , preferably spleen cells (splenocytes) , is prepared. Fourth, the cells to be immunized are incubated in the immunization medium with the chosen antigen and preprinted support cells. The procedure is summarised on the accompanying flow chart.
As shown in the flow chart, support cells are prepared (1), grown in a monolayer (2) for about 24 hours. Separately antigen responsive cells, eg spleen cells, are prepared (3), suspended (4) and pelleted (5). The medium of the support cells is replaced (6) and antigen is added and the support cells are incubated with the antigen, typically for two days (8) , prior to combing the primed support cells with the antigen responsive cells and optionally adding further antigen (9) .
The cells are incubated undisturbed, typically for 3 days (10) prior to use in hybridoma production.
1) PREPARATION OF ANTIGEN
a. The antigen must first be prepared in a suitable form. If the antigen is possibly cytotoxic, a cell toxicity test is advised. The effect of addition of the preparation at the recommended concentration for in vitro immunization (30 μg in 30 ml) to a healthy culture of myeloma cells is a suitable test.
b. i) Soluble antigens
As a general guide-line, a maximum of 30 μg of antigen in a volume of 0.3 ml is required for in vitro immunization, with a similar amount required to prime the support cells. Antigen concentrations of as little as lng per ml medium have been successfully used, and the preferred concentrations are in the range 50 ng to 1 μg per ml in the immunization medium. The optimum concentration varies according to the nature of the antigen. The antigen should ideally be prepared in a sterile form. Working from a sterile lyophilised preparation or a solid, the antigen can be dissolved directly in 0.2 ml of phosphate buffered saline or tissue culture medium in aseptic conditions.
If the antigen is already in solution, for example if it has been prepared biochemically, then it should be tested for sterility. Working in aseptic conditions, 0.2 ml of the antigen solution is added to a vial of sterility test broth. The vial is sealed tightly and shaken to mix and then incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. After this time, solutions which are contaminated will have a cloudy suspension. A clear solution indicates a sterile antigen preparation.
ii) Complex, surfaceborne antigen systems.
If whole cell preparations such as entire microorganisms, including bacteria or fungi, are used for immunization, the preparations must be treated to ensure they wi?.1 not continue to grow in vitro. This can be achieved by gamma irradiation or fixation.
As a guide for cell based systems, 107 cells will be required for immunization. Irradiation of the preparation to 50 Gy is necessary to prevent in vitro growth.
To fix the cells a suspension of the antigen is prepared, and pelleted by centrifugation and washed free of growth medium components as necessary. The pellet is resuspended in 1ml of 0.15% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. Using aseptic procedure the suspension is re-pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in 5ml of a sterile solution of bovine serum albumin in PBS. This blocking step is necessary to prevent other non-specific proteins from binding to the fixed material. The suspension is incubated for 90 minutes at room temperature and pelleted and resuspended in 0.2ml sterile splenocyte medium.
iii)Antigens, particularly relatively small antigens, or antigens which are immiscible with the cell culture medium, may be bound to a carrier substance or a solid matrix to enhance presentation to support cells. Suitable carriers include molecules such as Bovine Serum Albu_αin(BSA) or Keyhole Limpet Haemocyanin (KLH) or macroscopic carriers such as latex beads or nitrocellulose. 2. ESTABLISHMENT AND PRIMING OF SUPPORT CELLS
Using aseptic technique, 5ml of support cell medium is pipetted into a 25 cm2 flask. Sterile support cells are obtained and transferred to a laminar flow cabinet. Preferred support cells are from a Balb/c urine macrophage- derived cell line, J774A.1, A.T.C.C accession No TIE-,-.7. Alternatively, a non-renewable source of peritoneal macrophages may be used. The cells are pipetted into the flask. Vented flasks are preferred. The support cell medium, Eagle's minimal essential medium, alpha modification with ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 072-01900) and 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 013-06290) is typically used.
The flask is capped and placed in an incubator and left undisturbed for 24 hours. Using aseptic technique,- the medium is removed by pipette from the 25 cm2 flask and discarded. 5ml of fresh support cell medium is gently added to the flask and 20-30 μg of the sterile antigen is added.
3. PREPARATION OF SPLENOCYTES
Thymocyte conditioned media is prepared in advance as set out below.
Homogenise the thymuses typically from 4 x C57 Black 6 and 4 x BALB/c strains of mice in Dulbecco's Modified Minimal Essential Medium (Gibco Life Technologies Cat No. 074-02100 Appendix 2) with the recommended concentration of sodium hydrogen carbonate, (DMEM) + 10% rabbit serum, (Sigma R4505) keeping cell strains separate. Centrifuge and resuspend in DMEM + 2% Rabbit serum + 1% Non-essential amino acid solution (Sigma Cat. No. M7145) and 1% sodium pyruvate (Sigma Cat. No. S8636).
Mix cell strains in 1:1 ratio after counting. Adjust cell numbers to 4.6 x 106 cells /ml and add β Mercapto ethanol (BMe) to a final concentration of 1 μM. Aliquot the cell suspension into 75 cm2 growth area tissue culture flask, 25 ml per flask. Incubate 48 hours undisturbed in an atmosphere of 6% Co2 at a temperature 37.2 °C in a humidified atmosphere.
Collect media and centrifuge out cells. Filter media using 0.2μm pore size membrane (typically Sartorius Minisart unit Cat. No. SM16534K) .
To prepare immunization medium; Mix in ratio
12.5 ml Thymocyte conditioned medium 6 ml fetal calf serum
6 ml Feeder Supplement for Hybridoma.cells (Immune Systems - Cat. No. ISP1/FS)
8 ml tissue culture medium (typically Eagles MEM alpha modificationwithout ribonucleosides, deoxyribonucleosides, (Gibco Life Technologies - Cat. No. 072-02000 with NaHC03 as per manufacturer's recommendations) or fetal calf serum. Add β mercaptoethanol to final concentration of lμM, and aliquot into sterile bottles. Freeze at - 20°C. For use
The immunization medium is thawed at room temperature. The spleen is removed from a 10-12 week old mouse (typically balb\c). The spleen capsule is ruptured and the spleen is teased apart into small pieces, forming a crude suspension. This is then disrupted to form a single cell suspension. The cell suspension is pipetted into a centrifuge tube and spun at 400xg approximately for 5 minutes.
4. IMMUNIZATION
The flask of support cells is removed from the incubator to a laminar flow cabinet. The medium is aspirated from the flask. 5ml of fresh support cell medium is used to rinse the support cells. The medium is aspirated from the support cells. The supernatant from the spleen cell pellet is discarded by pipetting, and the pellet is resuspended in 5ml immunization medium and transferred to the flask containing the support cells. The remaining immunization medium is added to the flask. The sterile antigen preparation is added to the flask. The cap of the flask is fully tightened and the flask is placed with its 25 cm2 growing surface horizontal in the incubator undisturbed for up to five days. Immunization is not recommended to extend beyond 4 days as there is a rapid decline in cell viability due to medium exhaustion and cell fusion efficiency is reduced. After this time the primed splenocyte culture is ready for further processing as required. For preparation of antibody secreting hybridomas by fusion to a myeloma cell line or other form of immortalization is recommended.
The results of in vitro immunizations and subsequent hybridoma production in accordance with the invention compared to a protocol in which pre-primed supplementary support cells are not introduced are set out below.
1. "Comparative Example
Isotype analysis of reactive clones:
Expected Result IgM 75-83%
IgG 17-25%
2. in vitro immunization with use of pre-primed support cells: Isotype analysis of reactive clones:
Typical results
Test No.l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
IgM(%) 45 33 45 47 42 ND 33 29 43
IgG(%) 55 67 55 53 47 ND 66 59 53
IgA(%) ND ND ND ND 10 16 ND 12 3 It wiϊl be seen that the method of the invention provides enhanced presentation of antigen via support cells which may also secrete factors active on the cells being immunized resulting in an increased proportion of antibodies of the IgG and/or IgA type or class.

Claims

CIAIMS
1. A method of in vitro immunization of cells with an antigen to produce antibodies against that antigen, the method comprising incubating the cells with the antigen and support cells in which the support cells have previously been primed with the antigen.
2. A method according to claim 1 in which the cells to be immunized are splenocytes or lymphocytes or derivatives thereof.
3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2 in which the support cells are antigen presenting cells.
4. A method according to claim 3 in which the antigen presenting cells are selected frommacrophages, dendritic cells or other cells of the granulocyte macrophage lineage, Glial cells such as astrocytes, microglial cells, or epithelial cells, erythrocytes, B and T lymphocytes, Muller cells, Kupffer cells, fibroblasts, neoplastic cells; or derivatives thereof.
5. A method according to any preceding claim in which the support cells are primed in vitro with the antigen.
6. A method according to any preceding claim in which the cells to be immunized are incubated with the primed support cells and antigen in immunization medium.
7. A method according to any preceding claim in which of the antibodies produced by the cells more than 50% are IgG antibodies.
8. A method according to any preceding claim in which of the antibodies produced by the cells more than 10% are IgA antibodies.
9. A method according to any preceding claim in which antibodies are produced within 6 days of priming the support cells.
10. Antibodies produced according to a method of any preceding claim.
11. A kit for the use in a method for in vitro immunization of cells with an antigen according to any one of claims 1 to 9, the kit comprising support cells, and support cell growth medium, and growth medium (immunization medium) for cells to be immunized.
EP93900274A 1991-12-09 1992-12-09 In vitro antibody production Withdrawn EP0618978A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9126094 1991-12-09
GB919126094A GB9126094D0 (en) 1991-12-09 1991-12-09 In vitro antibody production
PCT/GB1992/002285 WO1993012247A1 (en) 1991-12-09 1992-12-09 In vitro antibody production

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0618978A1 true EP0618978A1 (en) 1994-10-12

Family

ID=10705922

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP93900274A Withdrawn EP0618978A1 (en) 1991-12-09 1992-12-09 In vitro antibody production

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0618978A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH07503841A (en)
AU (1) AU663144B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2124786A1 (en)
GB (1) GB9126094D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1993012247A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10640563B2 (en) 2016-06-08 2020-05-05 Abbvie Inc. Anti-B7-H3 antibodies and antibody drug conjugates

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011095592A1 (en) 2010-02-05 2011-08-11 Fzmb Gmbh Forschungszentrum Für Medizintechnik Und Biotechnologie In vitro process for the preparation of antibodies of the igg type

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3827145A1 (en) * 1987-12-03 1989-06-15 Biotechnolog Forschung Gmbh MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES, HYBRIDOMA CELL LINES FOR OBTAINING THE ANTIBODIES, METHOD FOR OBTAINING THE ANTIBODIES AND CELL LINES, AND USE OF THE ANTIBODIES
DE3921211C1 (en) * 1989-06-28 1990-11-29 Idt Ag Fuer In Vivo Diagnostik Und Therapie, Zuerich, Ch
JPH05507414A (en) * 1990-05-22 1993-10-28 ザ・リージェンツ・オブ・ザ・ユニバーシティ・オブ・カリフォルニア Method for producing human monoclonal antibodies with high antigen-specific affinity

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9312247A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10640563B2 (en) 2016-06-08 2020-05-05 Abbvie Inc. Anti-B7-H3 antibodies and antibody drug conjugates

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU663144B2 (en) 1995-09-28
JPH07503841A (en) 1995-04-27
CA2124786A1 (en) 1993-06-24
GB9126094D0 (en) 1992-02-12
WO1993012247A1 (en) 1993-06-24
AU3164393A (en) 1993-07-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0014519B1 (en) Cell lines, process for preparing them and process for producing antibodies
US4472500A (en) Rat myeloma cell lines
FI83538C (en) FOERFARANDE FOER PRODUKTION AV EN HYBRIDOMCELLINJE.
US4434230A (en) Human nonsecretory plasmacytoid cell line
FI75362B (en) FOERFARANDE FOER FRAMSTAELLNING AV EN MONOCLONAL ANTIKROPP MOT MAENNISKANS T-CELLER, MEDELST EN NY HYBRIDCELLINJE.
US8765133B2 (en) Method of producing anti-CD166 antibody in ostrich
Borrebaeck In vitro immunization for production of murine and human monoclonal antibodies: present status
Ritts Jr et al. Establishment and characterization of a human non‐secretory plasmacytoid cell line and its hybridization with human B cells
Liedgens et al. Highly efficient purification of the labile plant enzyme 5-aminolevulinate dehydratase (EC 4.2. 1.24) by means of monoclonal antibodies
AU663144B2 (en) In vitro antibody production
EP0157574B1 (en) Antitetanic antibody producing human-human hybridoma and method of producing the same
Malchow et al. Solubilization and partial purification of lymphocyte specific antigens in the chicken
Borrebaeck Development of in vitro immunization in murine and human hybridoma technology
GB2079313A (en) Improvements in or relating to rat myeloma cell lines
GB2145113A (en) Production of human monoclonal antibodies
Docherty et al. Low IgG FBS: applications to monoclonal antibody and vaccine production
SU1527260A1 (en) Strain of hybrid cultivable mus musculus cells as producer of monoclonal antibodies to alpha-thimosine
Todd III et al. Antigenic Markers on Human Monocytes and Macrophages
MITCHELL et al. Strategies of Therapeutic Immunomodulation
JPH05222098A (en) Reagent for classification and identification of candida
JPH0570437B2 (en)
JPH03271235A (en) Anti-candida antibody-secretive hybridoma
JPH07101879A (en) Immunoglobulin preparation and method for producing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19940621

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Withdrawal date: 19960319