EP0439244B1 - Nodularising method - Google Patents
Nodularising method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0439244B1 EP0439244B1 EP91300014A EP91300014A EP0439244B1 EP 0439244 B1 EP0439244 B1 EP 0439244B1 EP 91300014 A EP91300014 A EP 91300014A EP 91300014 A EP91300014 A EP 91300014A EP 0439244 B1 EP0439244 B1 EP 0439244B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- stage
- molten metal
- nodularising
- agent
- nodularising agent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21C—PROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
- C21C1/00—Refining of pig-iron; Cast iron
- C21C1/10—Making spheroidal graphite cast-iron
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C33/00—Making ferrous alloys
- C22C33/08—Making cast-iron alloys
- C22C33/10—Making cast-iron alloys including procedures for adding magnesium
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for the production of nodular iron.
- Holding nodular cast iron which, may contain, for example, about 0.03% to 0.08% of magnesium leads to the following difficulties.
- a build up of slag and reaction products can occur especially in the zone adjacent to the filling and pouring spouts and, when fitted, in the inductor channel.
- Relatively large alloy reaction chambers need to be incorporated in the gating system in order to house the nodularising alloy in quantities ranging, for example, from 0.8% to 1.3% of the casting spray weight which results in a reduction in casting yield of some 5% to 7%.
- the casting pouring rates need to be carefully controlled to within relatively narrow pre-determined times so as to ensure consistency of nodularisation.
- FR-A-2 150 329 also describes a process for producing magnesium-treated spheroidal graphite cast iron.
- the method involves a first pretreatment stage whereby magnesium is added to molten cast iron, followed by heating of the molten cast iron in a furnace to a temperature of at least 1480°C. The cast iron is heated at this temperature until sufficient magnesium has been removed so that the treated iron no longer forms spheroidal graphite.
- This pretreatment is then followed by the main magnesium treatment which is also carried out in the acid-lined treatment ladle using the pour-on method in an amount just sufficient to form spheroidal graphite.
- the purpose of the pretreatment stage is to desulphurise and deoxidise the bath and furthermore, the reheating allows the satisfactory cleaning of the base iron.
- the present invention therefore is directed to a method for the production of nodular graphite cast iron in which a required total amount of nodularising agent is introduced into the molten metal to be treated in at least two stages.
- the method comprises at least one treatment stage which takes place prior to the introduction of the molten metal into the mould cavity.
- a first treatment stage a portion of the total amount of nodularising agent is added, as specified in claim 1, to result in molten metal in which only a part of the graphite is in the form of nodules.
- the method further comprises at least one further treatment stage in which the remainder of the total amount of nodularising agent is added.
- the molten metal undergoes the final treatment stage, at least a portion of the graphite is in the form of nodules. Hence, as the molten metal undergoes the final treatment stage, the molten metal is partially nodularised.
- the nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, to the molten metal prior to its entry into the mould cavity and, in a second stage, to the metal within the mould cavity.
- the nodularising agent may be contained in the mould cavity itself or in a chamber associated therewith, prior to introduction of the metal or it may be added to the metal stream during its passage into the mould cavity.
- the method of introducing the nodularising agent at each stage may be any convenient known method of introducing nodularising agents into molten grey cast iron.
- the nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, by the IMCONOD process as described in European Patent No. 0086549 and, in a second stage, by the INMOLD process as described in British Patent No. 1278265.
- the nodularising agent is placed in a container supported in the base of a covered jacket or funnel and which has an aperture at the top of its peripheral walls, and optionally one or more other apertures in its peripheral walls remote from the funnel exit.
- the grey molten metal is poured from via a pouring bush over the nodularising agent held in the container wherein the metal reacts with the nodularising agent and the metal containing the agent is allowed to flow through the apertures in the container into an enclosed space around the additive containers subsequently allowing the molten metal to flow into a pouring ladle arranged beneath the additive container.
- the molten metal may flow in a zig-zag path and during the process contact of the molten metal with the atmosphere is restricted by means of the covered jacket or funnel housing the container.
- the partially nodularised molten metal is subsequently processed, in the second nodularisation step, by a conventional technique such as the INMOLD process.
- the moten metal to be treated is introduced into the mould cavity by way of a conventional pouring system which additionally includes one or more intermediate chambers containing a nodularising agent in an amount sufficient to complete conversion of the graphite to nodular or spheroidal form.
- the intermediate chamber may, for example, be connected directly to a pouring bush by means of which the mould is filled, or it may be connected directly to a sprue used in filling the mould, or to a feeding riser, runner or ingate of the mould or it may be connected to a whirlgate in the gating system.
- the nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, by the "Pourover” or “Overpour” system, a well known technique discussed in the article by Else et al above, and, in, a second stage, by the INMOLD process.
- the nodularising agent may be any known agent, including magnesium-containing and non-magnesium-containing nodularising agents as known in the art.
- the proportion of the nodularising agent which is introduced in the first stage is a matter of choice for the Foundryman and will depend, inter alia, on the particular treatment methods employed, the amount of active component e.g. magnesium contained in the nodulariser, the temperature and sulphur levels of the molten metal.
- a typical range of proportion would be 20%-80%, preferably 60%-70%, referring to a nodulariser containing 4%-6% magnesium. It should be understood however, that the proportion of nodularising agent introduced in the first stage must be sufficient to ensure that a significant degree of partial nodularisation takes place in the first stage.
- partial nodularisation used herein describes a structure consisting of graphite nodules and/or malformed nodules and/or compacted graphite flakes.
- the process according to the invention consists of adding the nodulariser in at least two distinct steps, as compared to conventional methods in which the total amount of the magnesium alloy is added to the metal during one operation.
- the first step of this process is one of partial nodularisation to a significant degree in contradistinction to pre-conditioning where little or no nodularisation takes place because the composition and quantity of additives used for pre-conditioning merely influence nucleation and response to nodularisation.
- the first step in the processing cycle consists of adding a part of the nodulariser to the molten metal held in either a ladle or furnace in order to effect partial nodularisation.
- This metal could optionally be held for an extended time in the partially nodularised condition by adding at intervals further small additions of nodulariser. Alternatively the final stage in the processing cycle could proceed without the holding stage.
- the final stage consists of complete nodularisation of the metal by the further addition of nodulariser/inoculant to the metal stream either within the mould itself, for example by the INMOLD process or added into the metal stream during entry of the metal into the mould cavity.
- Figures 1 and 2 are schematic representations of two embodiments respectively of an apparatus suitable for carrying out the process according to the invention.
- Figure 1 represents a combined pour-over and Inmold system.
- the nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, in the alloy chamber of a ladle 1. Molten metal from a furnace is poured over the nodularising agent contained in the alloy chamber of the ladle 1. In a second stage the partially nodularised molten metal is introduced via the ladle 1 into an Inmold system. Nodularising agent is introduced into a chamber adjoining or associated with the mould cavity.
- Figure 2 represents a combined Imconod and Inmold system.
- the nodularising agent in the first stage of the process, is contained within an additive container housed within a jacket or funnel 2.
- Molten metal from a furnace enters the Imconod system via a pouring bush 3 and the partially nodularised molten metal is collected in a ladle 1 and subsequently enters an Inmold system as in the embodiment illustrated in Figure 1.
- Nodularising/Inoculant addition (Typical) Metal Treatment Wt. (Nominal) 1000 kg Nodulariser Addition (into IMCONOD unit) (Alloy containing 3.5% - 4.2% Mg, 45-50% Si, 0.5-1.25% Ca, 0.5-1.0% Al, and 1.4-1.6% CeMM (Cerium mischmetal) 22 kg 2.2% (Alloy containing 4.5% - 5.0% Mg, 42-47% Si, 1.25-1.75% Ca, 0.5-1.0% Al and 1.5-2.0% CeMM) 18 kg 1.8% Inoculant addition (in Mould) (Typical inoculant composition: 76.0% Si, 3.50%- 5.0% Al, 0.45%-1.0% Ca, Balance Fe). 0.10%-0.15% Final metal composition (Typical) % :- T.C. Si. Mn. S Mg. 3.70 2.8 0.3 0.01 0.03
- the structure and mechanical properties of the nodular cast iron produced by the multiple stage process were measured using samples taken from two flywheel castings.
- the division of the nodularising addition is also advantageous in the holding of metal containing magnesium after the first stage of the nodularisation process.
- An important advantage of the process according to the invention is that it permits the use of a reaction chamber of much simpler design and of an extremely small surface area.
- reaction chamber with a small surface area offers practical and economic advantages to the user in that a relatively small amount of space is taken up on the pattern plate.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Refinement Of Pig-Iron, Manufacture Of Cast Iron, And Steel Manufacture Other Than In Revolving Furnaces (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a method for the production of nodular iron.
- In recent years there has, within the iron foundry industry, been an increase in the use of relatively large molten metal holding and pouring systems. Such systems provide a continuous supply of molten metal to the moulding plant and assist in increasing productivity, reducing costs and improving the consistency of the cast product.
- The use of these holding and pouring furnaces is satisfactory when used for holding and pouring flake graphite cast iron but problems arise in the case of nodular cast iron.
- Holding nodular cast iron which, may contain, for example, about 0.03% to 0.08% of magnesium leads to the following difficulties.
- A build up of slag and reaction products can occur especially in the zone adjacent to the filling and pouring spouts and, when fitted, in the inductor channel.
- A gradual loss of the magnesium and hence nodularity arises, thus necessitating the addition of further quantities of magnesium-containing alloys.
- These difficulties can be largely overcome by introducing the magnesium into the metal after it has left the holding/pouring furnace as is the case with the process described in U.K. Patent No. 1278265 (known as the INMOLD process). For certain applications, the INMOLD process, however, suffers from several disadvantages, namely:
- Relatively large alloy reaction chambers need to be incorporated in the gating system in order to house the nodularising alloy in quantities ranging, for example, from 0.8% to 1.3% of the casting spray weight which results in a reduction in casting yield of some 5% to 7%.
- The relatively large quantity of nodulariser present in the reaction chamber increases the risk of inclusions in the casting thus necessitating the use of elaborately designed gating systems which also result in a lowering of casting yield and corresponding increases in cost.
- The casting pouring rates need to be carefully controlled to within relatively narrow pre-determined times so as to ensure consistency of nodularisation.
- A common problem associated with such a nodularisation method is described in the discussion of the prior art in U.K. Patent No: 1278265 and is that of fading. Fading occurs when after the total amount of nodulariser has been added, some of the nodulariser is oxidised over time causing the iron to revert to its original flake form. U.K. Patent No: 127 8265 refers to the further addition of more magnesium during pouring to restore magnesium loss through fading. However, restoring fading in this manner leads to increased costs of manufacturing and the use of excessive quantities of nodularising agents which can result in the production of dirty castings through the formation of oxides and silicates.
- FR-A-2 150 329 also describes a process for producing magnesium-treated spheroidal graphite cast iron. The method involves a first pretreatment stage whereby magnesium is added to molten cast iron, followed by heating of the molten cast iron in a furnace to a temperature of at least 1480°C. The cast iron is heated at this temperature until sufficient magnesium has been removed so that the treated iron no longer forms spheroidal graphite. This pretreatment is then followed by the main magnesium treatment which is also carried out in the acid-lined treatment ladle using the pour-on method in an amount just sufficient to form spheroidal graphite. The purpose of the pretreatment stage is to desulphurise and deoxidise the bath and furthermore, the reheating allows the satisfactory cleaning of the base iron.
- The present invention therefore is directed to a method for the production of nodular graphite cast iron in which a required total amount of nodularising agent is introduced into the molten metal to be treated in at least two stages. The method comprises at least one treatment stage which takes place prior to the introduction of the molten metal into the mould cavity. In a first treatment stage a portion of the total amount of nodularising agent is added, as specified in
claim 1, to result in molten metal in which only a part of the graphite is in the form of nodules. The method further comprises at least one further treatment stage in which the remainder of the total amount of nodularising agent is added. According to the method of the present invention, as the molten metal undergoes the final treatment stage, at least a portion of the graphite is in the form of nodules. Hence, as the molten metal undergoes the final treatment stage, the molten metal is partially nodularised. - Preferably the nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, to the molten metal prior to its entry into the mould cavity and, in a second stage, to the metal within the mould cavity. In the second stage, the nodularising agent may be contained in the mould cavity itself or in a chamber associated therewith, prior to introduction of the metal or it may be added to the metal stream during its passage into the mould cavity.
- The method of introducing the nodularising agent at each stage may be any convenient known method of introducing nodularising agents into molten grey cast iron.
- For example, any known process, as described in the British Foundryman, F1527, January 1986 pages 18 et seq, in the article by G.E. Else and H.T. Dixon, could be employed.
- In a particular embodiment of the invention the nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, by the IMCONOD process as described in European Patent No. 0086549 and, in a second stage, by the INMOLD process as described in British Patent No. 1278265.
- In the IMCONOD system the nodularising agent is placed in a container supported in the base of a covered jacket or funnel and which has an aperture at the top of its peripheral walls, and optionally one or more other apertures in its peripheral walls remote from the funnel exit. The grey molten metal is poured from via a pouring bush over the nodularising agent held in the container wherein the metal reacts with the nodularising agent and the metal containing the agent is allowed to flow through the apertures in the container into an enclosed space around the additive containers subsequently allowing the molten metal to flow into a pouring ladle arranged beneath the additive container. The molten metal may flow in a zig-zag path and during the process contact of the molten metal with the atmosphere is restricted by means of the covered jacket or funnel housing the container.
- In the present invention the partially nodularised molten metal is subsequently processed, in the second nodularisation step, by a conventional technique such as the INMOLD process.
- In the INMOLD process, the moten metal to be treated is introduced into the mould cavity by way of a conventional pouring system which additionally includes one or more intermediate chambers containing a nodularising agent in an amount sufficient to complete conversion of the graphite to nodular or spheroidal form.
- The intermediate chamber may, for example, be connected directly to a pouring bush by means of which the mould is filled, or it may be connected directly to a sprue used in filling the mould, or to a feeding riser, runner or ingate of the mould or it may be connected to a whirlgate in the gating system.
- In another embodiment the nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, by the "Pourover" or "Overpour" system, a well known technique discussed in the article by Else et al above, and, in, a second stage, by the INMOLD process.
- The nodularising agent may be any known agent, including magnesium-containing and non-magnesium-containing nodularising agents as known in the art. The proportion of the nodularising agent which is introduced in the first stage is a matter of choice for the Foundryman and will depend, inter alia, on the particular treatment methods employed, the amount of active component e.g. magnesium contained in the nodulariser, the temperature and sulphur levels of the molten metal.
- A typical range of proportion would be 20%-80%, preferably 60%-70%, referring to a nodulariser containing 4%-6% magnesium. It should be understood however, that the proportion of nodularising agent introduced in the first stage must be sufficient to ensure that a significant degree of partial nodularisation takes place in the first stage.
- The term "partial nodularisation" used herein describes a structure consisting of graphite nodules and/or malformed nodules and/or compacted graphite flakes.
- The process according to the invention consists of adding the nodulariser in at least two distinct steps, as compared to conventional methods in which the total amount of the magnesium alloy is added to the metal during one operation.
- The first step of this process is one of partial nodularisation to a significant degree in contradistinction to pre-conditioning where little or no nodularisation takes place because the composition and quantity of additives used for pre-conditioning merely influence nucleation and response to nodularisation.
- The first step in the processing cycle consists of adding a part of the nodulariser to the molten metal held in either a ladle or furnace in order to effect partial nodularisation.
- This metal could optionally be held for an extended time in the partially nodularised condition by adding at intervals further small additions of nodulariser. Alternatively the final stage in the processing cycle could proceed without the holding stage.
- The final stage consists of complete nodularisation of the metal by the further addition of nodulariser/inoculant to the metal stream either within the mould itself, for example by the INMOLD process or added into the metal stream during entry of the metal into the mould cavity.
- The invention is illustrated by the accompanying drawings wherein Figures 1 and 2 are schematic representations of two embodiments respectively of an apparatus suitable for carrying out the process according to the invention.
- Figure 1 represents a combined pour-over and Inmold system. The nodularising agent is introduced, in a first stage, in the alloy chamber of a
ladle 1. Molten metal from a furnace is poured over the nodularising agent contained in the alloy chamber of theladle 1. In a second stage the partially nodularised molten metal is introduced via theladle 1 into an Inmold system. Nodularising agent is introduced into a chamber adjoining or associated with the mould cavity. - Figure 2 represents a combined Imconod and Inmold system. In this embodiment, in the first stage of the process, the nodularising agent is contained within an additive container housed within a jacket or
funnel 2. Molten metal from a furnace enters the Imconod system via apouring bush 3 and the partially nodularised molten metal is collected in aladle 1 and subsequently enters an Inmold system as in the embodiment illustrated in Figure 1. - The invention is illustrated by the following Examples which compare the multiple stage process according to the present invention with conventional processes.
-
Nodularising/Inoculant addition (Typical) Metal Treatment Wt. (Nominal) 1000 kg Nodulariser Addition (into IMCONOD unit) (Alloy containing 3.5% - 4.2% Mg, 45-50% Si, 0.5-1.25% Ca, 0.5-1.0% Al, and 1.4-1.6% CeMM (Cerium mischmetal) 22 kg 2.2% (Alloy containing 4.5% - 5.0% Mg, 42-47% Si, 1.25-1.75% Ca, 0.5-1.0% Al and 1.5-2.0% CeMM) 18 kg 1.8% Inoculant addition (in Mould) (Typical inoculant composition: 76.0% Si, 3.50%- 5.0% Al, 0.45%-1.0% Ca, Balance Fe). 0.10%-0.15% Final metal composition (Typical) % :- T.C. Si. Mn. S Mg. 3.70 2.8 0.3 0.01 0.03 -
-
- The structure and mechanical properties of the nodular cast iron produced by the multiple stage process were measured using samples taken from two flywheel castings.
- These samples revealed that the material has a structure typical of nodular cast iron consisting of well formed graphite nodules in a predominantly ferritic matrix and the mechanical properties were found to be exceptionally good, being significantly better than the minimum specified.
Mechanical Properties Minimum Specified Obtained Tensile 500N/mm2 601 N/mm2 592 N/mm2 Elongation 7% 15 15 Hardness 250 max. 197 197 -
-
-
-
Processing Step 1 Pour OverMetal Treatment Wt. 400 kg Nodulariser Addition
(Alloy containing 4.5% - 5.0% Mg. 42-47% Si, 1.25-1.75% Ca, 0.5- 1.0% Al and 1.5-2.0% CeMM)3.2 kg 0.8% Metal composition after Step 1%:- T.C. Si Mn S Mg 3.79 2.09 0.06 0.014 ND ND = Not determined Final metal composition %:- T.C Si Mn S Mg ND ND ND ND 0.029 ND = Not Determined - As in the case with the example from Foundry A, the structure and mechanical properties were measured using samples taken from the castings with the following excellent results for a ferritic nodular cast iron.
Structure Mechanical Properties Well formed graphite nodules in ferritic matrix. Tensile N/mm 2 0.2% Proof Stress N/mm 2 Elongation % 412 257 30 - We have found that the process according to the invention affords several advantages over prior art techniques.
- Introduction of the nodulariser in two or more stages, for example by the combined IMCONOD/INMOLD process exemplified (Foundry A) offers the following significant advantages when:
- a) compared with IMCONOD
Considerable cost savings resulting from the use of less nodulariser, i.e. 1.3% compared to (1. 8-2.2%) without the need for an addition of some 0.15% of mould inoculant. - b) compared with INMOLD
The combined process, whilst using similar amounts of nodulariser when compared to INMOLD, i.e. 1.27% cf 1.37%, offers a definite cost advantage in that the size of the INMOLD reaction chamber is considerably reduced, i.e. from 87 mm. X 63 mm. X 74 mm. high to 45 mm. X 45 mm. X 64mm high. Apart from the obvious reduction in weight leading to an increase in casting yield, the significant reduction in area means that less space is taken up on the pattern plate thus minimising one of the disadvantages of the process. - In addition to the cost saving referred to, the use of relatively small INMOLD reaction chambers and low quantities of alloy in the mould has surprisingly resulted in noticeable improvements in casting cleanliness when compared with the conventional INMOLD process.
- It should also be noted that quality of the nodular cast iron produced by the combined process method has been exceptionally high.
- As also exemplified (Foundry B) we have shown advantages of the present process:
- a) Compared with Pour Over
Significant cost savings resulting from the use of less nodulariser, i.e. 1.15% compared to 2.3%. - b) Compared to INMOLD
The same advantages as reported by Foundry A. In the case of Foundry B the alloy reaction chamber was reduced from 75 mm. X 75mm. X 80 mm. high to 45 mm. X 45mm. X 60 mm. high. - The division of the nodularising addition is also advantageous in the holding of metal containing magnesium after the first stage of the nodularisation process.
- An important advantage of the process according to the invention is that it permits the use of a reaction chamber of much simpler design and of an extremely small surface area.
- The use of a reaction chamber with a small surface area offers practical and economic advantages to the user in that a relatively small amount of space is taken up on the pattern plate.
- We would also expect the volume of the reaction chamber to be less when using the present process thus resulting in another important practical advantage.
- We have found that the small surface area of the reaction chamber and hence the relatively small area of alloy exposed to the metal stream, leads to significant improvements in casting cleanliness.
- With the combined nodular process, problems due to magnesium variations are anticipated and the process leads to improved consistency as compared to conventional techniques.
Claims (9)
- A method for the production of nodular graphite cast iron in which a required total amount of nodularising agent is introduced into the molten metal to be treated in at least two stages, which comprises:-(1) at least one treatment stage which takes place prior to the introduction of the molten metal into the mould cavity and wherein in a first treatment stage a portion of the total amount of nodularising agent is added to result in molten metal in which only a part of the graphite is in the form of nodules, and(2) at least one further treatment stage in which the remainder of the total amount of nodularising agent is added.characterised in that as the molten metal undergoes treatment stage (2) at least a portion of the graphite is in the form of nodules, wherein between 20 to 80% of a nodulariser comprising 4 to 6% magnesium is added during the first treatment stage.
- A method according to claim 1, which further ccmprises a holding stage which takes place after stage (1) and wherein further additions of nodularising agent can be made.
- A method according to any of claims 1 and 2, wherein the nodularising agent is introduced in said first treatment stage, to the molten metal prior to its entry and, in the second stage, to the molten metal within the mould cavity.
- A method according to claim 3, wherein, in the second stage, the nodularising agent may be contained in the mould cavity or in a chamber associated therewith prior to the introduction of the molten metal.
- A method according to claim 3, wherein, in the second stage, the nodularising agent is added to the molten metal stream during its passage in to the mould cavity.
- A method according to any of claims 1 and 2, wherein in the first stage, the nodularising agent is held in a container which is housed within a covered jacket or funnel to restrict contact of the molten metal being treated with the atmosphere, said container having an aperture at the top of its peripheral walls and optionally one or more other apertures in its peripheral walls, wherein molten metal is poured over the nodularising agent held within the container from via a pouring brush which opens directly or indirectly into said container, and the molten metal containing the nodularising agent flows through said aperatures and into a pouring ladle and in the second stage, the metal containing the nodularising agent is introduced into the mould cavity by way of a conventional pouring system which additionally includes one or more intermediate chambers containing the nodularising agent in an amount sufficient to complete the conversion of the graphite to nodular or spheroidal form.
- A method according to any of claims 1 and 2 wherein, in the first stage, the nodularising agent is introduced into the molten metal by the Pourover system and, in the second stage, the metal containing the nodularising agent is introduced into the mould cavity by way of a conventional pouring system which additionally includes one or more intermediate chambers containing the nodularising agent in an amount sufficient to complete the conversion of the graphite to nodular or spheroidal form.
- A method according to any of claims 1 and 2 wherein, the nodularising agent is introduced at the first stage into the molten metal contained in a holding/pouring furnace and in the second stage during the passage of the molten metal into the mould cavity.
- A method according to any of claims 1 and 2 wherein, in the first stage, the nodularising agent is introduced into the molten metal in a holding/pouring furnace and in the second stage, the metal containing the nodularising agent is introduced into the mould cavity by way of a conventional pouring system which additionally includes one or more intermediate chambers containing the nodularising agent in an amount sufficient to complete the conversion of the graphite to nodular or spheroidal form.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB9000899 | 1990-01-16 | ||
GB909000899A GB9000899D0 (en) | 1990-01-16 | 1990-01-16 | Nodularlising method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0439244A1 EP0439244A1 (en) | 1991-07-31 |
EP0439244B1 true EP0439244B1 (en) | 1997-05-02 |
Family
ID=10669338
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP91300014A Expired - Lifetime EP0439244B1 (en) | 1990-01-16 | 1991-01-02 | Nodularising method |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0439244B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69125860T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0439244T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2103772T3 (en) |
GB (1) | GB9000899D0 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0629709A1 (en) * | 1993-05-18 | 1994-12-21 | Grafit-Verwertung Richard Anton Kg | Process and inoculant for the production of cast iron |
CN114074183B (en) * | 2021-11-29 | 2023-04-25 | 国铭铸管股份有限公司 | Method for reducing internal defects of surface of spheroidal graphite cast tube |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2143521B2 (en) * | 1971-08-24 | 1973-11-15 | Gebrueder Sulzer Ag, Winterthur (Schweiz) | Process for the manufacture of nodular graphite-containing cast iron treated with magnesium |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1278265A (en) * | 1968-07-17 | 1972-06-21 | Materials & Methods Ltd | Improved process for the manufacture of nodular cast iron |
RO71368A2 (en) * | 1979-02-16 | 1981-08-30 | Institutul De Cercetaresstiintifica,Inginerie Tehnologica Si Proiectare Pentru Sectoare Calde,Ro | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING VERMICULAR GRAPHITE BRIDGES BY DOUBLE CHANGE |
EP0086549B1 (en) * | 1982-01-20 | 1986-07-30 | The International Meehanite Metal Company Limited | Apparatus and process for the treatment of molten metal |
DE3801917A1 (en) * | 1988-01-23 | 1989-08-03 | Metallgesellschaft Ag | METHOD FOR PRODUCING CAST IRON WITH BALL GRAPHITE |
-
1990
- 1990-01-16 GB GB909000899A patent/GB9000899D0/en active Pending
-
1991
- 1991-01-02 EP EP91300014A patent/EP0439244B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-01-02 ES ES91300014T patent/ES2103772T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-01-02 DE DE1991625860 patent/DE69125860T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1991-01-02 DK DK91300014T patent/DK0439244T3/en active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2143521B2 (en) * | 1971-08-24 | 1973-11-15 | Gebrueder Sulzer Ag, Winterthur (Schweiz) | Process for the manufacture of nodular graphite-containing cast iron treated with magnesium |
GB1359623A (en) * | 1971-08-24 | 1974-07-10 | Sulzer Ag | Process of producing magnesium-treated spheroidal graphite cast iron |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
GIESSEREI, vol.54, november 1967, Düsseldorf DE, K.Reifferscheid: "Verfahren zum Schmelzen von Gusseisenschmelzen", pages 621-624 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB9000899D0 (en) | 1990-03-14 |
DE69125860T2 (en) | 1997-12-04 |
DE69125860D1 (en) | 1997-06-05 |
ES2103772T3 (en) | 1997-10-01 |
EP0439244A1 (en) | 1991-07-31 |
DK0439244T3 (en) | 1997-11-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3703922A (en) | Process for the manufacture of nodular cast iron | |
US4432793A (en) | Ferroalloy for the treatment of cast metals and process | |
HUP0003515A2 (en) | Method of making iron and steel | |
EP0357521A1 (en) | Process for the production of spheroidal graphite cast iron | |
US3851700A (en) | Method of inoculating nodular cast iron | |
US3793000A (en) | Process for preparing killed low carbon steel and continuously casting the same, and the solidified steel shapes thus produced | |
EP0317366B1 (en) | Process for producing nodular cast iron | |
EP0439244B1 (en) | Nodularising method | |
US4451430A (en) | Method of producing copper alloy by melting technique | |
ITMI930305A1 (en) | NODULAR CAST IRON AND PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING NODULAR CAST IRON | |
US4238231A (en) | Apparatus for treatment of molten metal | |
CN101463446B (en) | Low-alloy white cast iron | |
US3762915A (en) | Method for casting gray cast iron composition | |
US4616690A (en) | Process and apparatus for moulding ingots of ferro-alloys by chill casting in a cooled copper mould | |
JP3475607B2 (en) | Prevention of chunky graphite crystallization of spheroidal graphite cast iron. | |
CN114932202B (en) | Casting method of large-tonnage die casting machine template casting | |
KR102379952B1 (en) | System for casting by splitting molten material | |
EP4428259A1 (en) | A method for the modification of primary carbide precipitates in cast iron alloys | |
CN115383062A (en) | Inoculation sheet for precision investment casting and internal inoculation treatment method | |
JPH09111327A (en) | Production of thin ductile casting by addition of bismuth | |
RU2039628C1 (en) | Method of manufacturing semifinished articles for metallurgic conversion | |
SU1435609A1 (en) | Method of producing cast iron with vermicular graphite | |
SU706184A1 (en) | Method of casting ferroalloys | |
US3132936A (en) | Refining of irons and steels | |
SU1275046A1 (en) | Method of inoculating cast iron |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE DK ES FR GB IT NL SE |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: CANNING, HENRY CECIL Inventor name: MANNION, GEOFFREY |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19911001 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19920116 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE DK ES FR GB IT NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69125860 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19970605 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2103772 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19980309 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 19980326 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 19980728 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 19980728 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19980728 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 19980730 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19980731 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990202 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990801 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19990102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19991103 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20010910 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20050102 |