EP0359874B1

EP0359874B1 - A non-oxidative catalytic method of sweetening a sour hydrocarbon fraction

Info

Publication number: EP0359874B1
Application number: EP88308682A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Tamotsu Imai; Jeffrey C. Bricker
Original assignee: UOP LLC
Current assignee: Honeywell UOP LLC
Priority date: 1988-09-20
Filing date: 1988-09-20
Publication date: 1992-06-24
Also published as: EP0359874A1; ATE77639T1; DE3872392D1; DE3872392T2

Abstract

A sour hydrocarbon fraction is sweetened by treating the sour hydrocarbon fraction containing mercaptans with sufficient unsaturated hydrocarbons in the presence of an acid-type catalyst at non-oxidative reaction conditions selected to convert said mercaptans to thioethers. Acid type catalysts which may be used include polymeric sulfonic acid resins, intercalate compounds, solid acid catalysts and acidic inorganic oxide catalysts.

Description

The present invention relates to a unique non-oxidative method of sweetening sour hydrocarbon streams using an unsaturated hydrocarbon and a catalyst together with appropriate thioether producing conditions.
Processes for the treatment of a sour hydrocarbon fraction wherein the fraction is treated by contacting said fraction with an oxidation catalyst in the presence of an oxidizing agent and an alkaline component have become well-known and widely practiced in the petroleum refining industry. Said processes are typically designed to effect the oxidation of offensive mercaptans contained in a sour hydrocarbon fraction with the formation of innocuous disulfides--a process commonly referred to as sweetening. The oxidizing agent is most often air. Gasoline, including natural, straight run and cracked gasolines, is the most frequently treated sour hydrocarbon fraction. Other sour hydrocarbon fractions include the normally gaseous petroleum fractions as well as naphtha, kerosene, jet fuel, fuel oil, lube oil, and the like.
A commonly used continuous process for treating a sour hydrocarbon fraction entails treating the distillate in contact with a metal phthalocyanine catalyst dispersed in an aqueous caustic solution to yield a doctor sweet product. The sour hydrocarbon fraction and the catalyst containing aqueous caustic solution provide a liquid-liquid system wherein mercaptans are converted to disulfides at the interface of the immiscible solutions in the presence of an oxidizing agent--usually air. Sour hydrocarbon fractions containing more-difficult-to-oxidise mercaptans are more effectively treated by contacting with a metal chelate catalyst disposed on a high surface area adsorptive support--usually a metal phthalocyanine on an activated charcoal. The sour fraction is treated by contacting with the supported metal chelate catalyst at oxidation conditions in the presence of an alkaline agent. One such process is described in US-A-2,988,500. The oxidizing agent is most often air admixed with the hydrocarbon fraction to be treated, and the alkaline agent is most often an aqueous caustic solution charged continuously to the process or intermittently as required to maintain the catalyst in the caustic-wetted state.
Heretofore, the practice of catalytically treating mercaptan containing sour hydrocarbon fractions has involved the introduction of alkaline agents, usually sodium hydroxide, into the sour petroleum distillate prior to or during the treating operation. (US-A-3,108,081 and 4,156,641). These patents along with several others which teach improvements of the basic process all deal with an oxidative method of treating mercaptans in a sour hydrocarbon fraction.
US-A-3,894,107 teaches the conversion of heteroatom compounds to higher hydrocarbons over a particular type of aluminosilicate molecular sieve at temperatures of 300°C - 500°C, in the gas phase. Thus, if mercaptans are used in this process, the resultant products would be higher hydrocarbons and H₂S. The formation of H₂S would present a disposal problem. Therefore, because of the H₂S disposal problem and the high temperatures involved, this process is not useful as a hydrocarbon sweetening process.
US-A-3,894,941 discloses a process in which mercaptans in a sour hydrocarbon feed are converted to sulfides by reaction with a tertiary olefin in the presence of a catalyst comprising a Group VIB or Group VIII metal or a semi-crystalline or amorphous silica-alumina support material.
The present invention discloses a non-oxidative method of sweetening a sour hydrocarbon fraction comprising contacting a mercaptan-containing sour hydrocarbon fraction with an acid catalyst of certain types in the presence of an unsaturated hydrocarbon, thereby converting said mercaptans to thioethers. The instant invention has the advantage over the oxidative method of the prior art in that no alkaline agent is involved in the present invention and therefore the problem of disposing of the spent alkaline agent is eliminated. Unlike US-A-3,894,941 the acid catalyst does not require the presence of a Group VIB or Group VIII metal.
It is a broad objective of this invention to present a novel non-oxidative process for treating a sour hydrocarbon fraction. According to the invention a non-oxidative process for sweetening a sour hydrocarbon fraction containing mercaptans comprises contacting said sour hydrocarbon fraction and an unsaturated hydrocarbon with an acid catalyst consisting of an acidic inorganic oxide, a polymeric sulfonic acid resin, an intercalate compound, a boron halide or aluminum halide dispersed on alumina, a natural or synthetic zeolite, or boric acid or sulfuric acid or a phosphoric acid supported on an inorganic oxide support under a non-oxidizing atmosphere, thereby converting said mercaptans to thioethers, and recovering the resulting sweetened hydrocarbon fraction.
In a specific embodiment of this invention the sour hydrocarbon fraction which contains mercaptans and an unsaturated hydrocarbon is continuously contacted with an acidic sulfonic resin.
Figure 1 is a graphical representation of the performance of one of the catalysts whose use characterises the present invention, catalyst A. The amount of residual mercaptan in the hydrocarbon fraction is plotted versus time on stream.
Figure 2 is a graphical comparison of the durability of catalyst A when it is used to treat an acid washed sour hydrocarbon stream versus when it is used to treat an unwashed sour hydrocarbon stream. The conversion of mercaptans to thioethers is plotted versus time on stream.
The reaction of thiols with olefins possessing electron withdrawing functions is known (A.N. Glazer, Annual Rev. Biochem., 39, 108 (1970); W. L. Baker, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol., 34A, 227-236 (1984).
However, this is a stoichiometric reaction which is not useful as a catalytic sweetening agent due to a low reaction rate. This invention describes a catalytic method for converting mercaptans through reaction with unsaturated hydrocarbons in the presence of an acid catalyst and thereby provides a non-oxidative method of sweetening a sour hydrocarbon fraction. The generalized reaction can be written as follows:

where each R is individually selected from hydrogen, an alkyl hydrocarbon, a cycloalkyl hydrocarbon, an aryl hydrocarbon, an alkaryl hydrocarbon and an aralkyl hydrocarbon. If R is any of the hydrocarbons listed above, the hydrocarbon may contain up to about 25 carbon atoms. It is preferable to choose each R such that the unsaturated hydrocarbon contains a tertiary carbon atom. R′SH represents any mercaptan compound where R′ is a hydrocarbon radical containing up to about 25 carbon atoms and is selected from alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, alkaryl, and aralkyl.
The above equation shows that an acid catalyst can catalyze the reaction of mercaptans with an unsaturated hydrocarbon to give thioethers which are acceptable products. Acid catalysts which have been found to be effective in promoting the thioetherification reaction include catalysts consisting of acidic reticular polymeric sulfonic resins, intercalate compounds, solid boric, sulfuric and phosphoric acid catalysts or acidic inorganic oxides. Although both macro- and microreticular polymeric sulfonic acid resins may be used, it is preferred to use macroreticular polymeric sulfonic acid resins. These types of resins are well known in the art and are available commercially.
An intercalate compound is defined as a material which has a layer of cations between the planes of a crystal lattice. Only intercalate compounds which are acidic are contemplated as within the scope of this invention. Examples of acidic intercalate compounds are antimony halides in graphite, aluminum halides in graphite, and zirconium halides in graphite. A preferred intercalate compound is antimony pentafluoride in graphite. Again these compounds are commercially available.
Solid boric, sulfuric and phosphoric acid catalysts have also been found to catalyze the conversion of mercaptans to thioethers. These catalysts are a phosphoric acid or sulfuric acid or boric acid supported on an inorganic oxide support such as silica, alumina, silica-aluminas, kieselguhr or clays. These acid catalysts are usually prepared by reacting the desired liquid acid with the desired support and drying. Examples of another type of catalyst are acidic inorganic oxides. Acidic inorganic oxide catalysts which may be used in this invention may be selected from the group consisting of aluminas and silica-aluminas. Natural and synthetic zeolites such as faujasites, mordenites, L, omega, X and Y zeolites can also be used. Many of these oxides and zeolites can either be synthesized or preferably can be obtained from commercial sources.
Another group of acid catalysts whose use is within the scope of the invention are aluminas or silica-aluminas which have been impregnated with aluminum halides or boron halides. A preferred catalyst of this type is boron trifluoride deposited on alumina.
Regardless of what type of catalyst is employed in the present invention, it is preferred that the catalyst be in particulate form, which particles have an average diameter of less than 4.0 mm. Additionally, it is preferred that the average particle size (average diameter) be in the range of 105 microns to 4.0 mm. If the catalyst particle size is smaller than 105 microns, excessive backpressure is created in the treating zone.
Examples of sour hydrocarbon fractions which can be treated using the process of the present invention include FCC gasoline, kerosene, thermally cracked gasoline, straight-run naphtha, LPG and fuel oil. It is preferred that the sour hydrocarbon fraction contain an unsaturated hydrocarbon. In principle, any unsaturated hydrocarbon may be used and it may be selected from olefins, diolefins, alkynes, etc. However, it is preferable to utilize an unsaturated hydrocarbon which is capable of forming a tertiary carbonium ion in the presence of an acid catalyst. Examples of hydrocarbons which have an unsaturated carbon-carbon bond with one of said unsaturated carbons also being a tertiary carbon atom are isobutylene, 3-methyl-1-butene, 2-methyl-2-butene, 2-methyl-1-butene, 2-methyl-1-pentene, etc.
The concentration of the unsaturated hydrocarbon used to carry out the process of the instant invention can vary considerably. However, a concentration of unsaturated hydrocarbon of at least equal to the molar amount of the mercaptans present in said sour hydrocarbon fraction is necessary to carry out the process with optimum efficiency. In the event that the sour hydrocarbon fraction does not contain an unsaturated hydrocarbon, one can be added to the sour hydrocarbon fraction prior to contact with the fixed bed catalyst. When the unsaturated hydrocarbon is added to the sour hydrocarbon fraction, it is desirable that it be added in a concentration of from at least the molar concentration of the mercaptans in said sour hydrocarbon fraction up to about 20 weight percent of the sour hydrocarbon fraction. The upper limit is imposed more by economic considerations rather than any practical limitations of the process. A recommended concentration range of unsaturated hydrocarbon is 0.01 weight percent to 20 weight percent.
The process of the invention can be carried out by passing the sour hydrocarbon fraction over a fixed bed of the acid catalyst which is installed in a reaction zone. The fixed bed of catalyst can be placed in either a vertical or a horizontal reaction zone. If a vertical reaction zone is chosen, the sour hydrocarbon fraction can be passed upwardly or downwardly through the fixed bed. The methods of supporting beds of solid material in reaction zones are well known and need not be described in detail herein.
The sour hydrocarbon fraction is introduced into the reaction zone by a feed line and the flow can be controlled by means well known in the art. The flow of the hydrocarbon fraction can be controlled to give a contact time in the reaction zone so that the desired conversion of mercaptans to thioethers is achieved. Specifically, contact times equivalent to a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.5 to 10 are effective to achieve a good conversion of mercaptans to thioethers.
Additionally, treatment of the sour hydrocarbon fraction in the reaction zone is generally effected in a temperature range of 25° to 350°C, with a preferred temperature range of 25°C to 200°C. The reaction may be carried out at a pressure of 0.01 to 25 bars (0.01 to 25 atmospheres), with a pressure in the range of 1 to 10 atmospheres being preferred.
Since thioetherification is a non-oxidative reaction, the contact of hydrocarbon fraction with the acid catalyst takes place under a non-oxidative atmosphere. The prevention of contact between oxygen and hydrocarbon under the refinery conditions is easily accomplished using standard operating procedures.
If it is necessary to add an unsaturated hydrocarbon to the reaction zone to effect the thioetherification reaction, the unsaturated hydrocarbon can be added to the sour hydrocarbon fraction at the start of the reaction zone but well before the fixed bed acid catalyst. This will ensure that the unsaturated hydrocarbon is well dispersed in the sour hydrocarbon fraction. It is contemplated that any unreacted unsaturated hydrocarbon could be separated at the reactor outlet and recycled to the inlet of the catalyst bed.
For example, the sweetening of high molecular weight petroleum fractions (kerosene, fuel oil) might be accomplished by addition of excess isobutylene to the hydrocarbon feed over an acid catalyst. The separation and recycle of unreacted isobutylene could be employed to increase sweetening rate and minimize the use of isobutylene.
Alternatively, the entire process can be carried out in a batch process. The pressure conditions, temperature conditions and unsaturated hydrocarbon concentration employed for the flow type process can be used for a batch process. However, the contact time in the reaction zone will depend on the amount of catalyst, the size of the reaction zone, and the amount of sour hydrocarbon in the reaction zone. Based on these considerations, an appropriate conversion of mercaptan to thioether would be accomplished with a contact time in the range of from 0.05 to 2 hours.
In some instances the acid catalyst can be deactivated by basic nitrogen compounds present in the sour hydrocarbon fraction. Thus, in order to minimize catalyst deactivation, it is desirable to treat the sour hydrocarbon fraction to remove the basic nitrogen compounds prior to contacting the sour hydrocarbon fraction with the acid catalyst.
Removal of the basic nitrogen compounds can be accomplished by several methods known in the art, including an acid wash or the use of a guard bed positioned prior to the acid catalyst. Examples of effective guard beds include A-zeolite, Y-zeolite, L-zeolite, mordenite and acidic reticular polymeric resins. If a guard bed technique is employed, it is contemplated that dual guard beds be placed prior to the reactor such that regeneration of one guard bed may be conducted while the alternate guard bed is functioning. In this manner continuous operation of the unit may be achieved. When an acid wash is desired, the sour hydrocarbon fraction can be treated with an aqueous solution of the acid. The concentration of said acid in said aqueous solution is not critical, but is conveniently chosen to be in the range of 0.5 to 30 weight percent. The acid which can be used to treat the sour hydrocarbon fraction may be chosen from the group consisting of hydrochloric, sulfuric, acetic, etc. acid, with hydrochloric acid being preferred.
One method of effecting the acid wash involves introducing a sour hydrocarbon stream into the lower portion of an extraction column. The sour hydrocarbon stream rises upward through contacting plates or trays toward the top of the extractor counter-current to a descending stream of an aqueous acid solution. Upon contact of the aqueous acid solution with the sour hydrocarbon fraction, the basic nitrogen compounds contained in said sour hydrocarbon fraction are extracted into the aqueous acid solution. The sour hydrocarbon fraction continues upward past the point in the upper portion of the column at which the aqueous acid solution is introduced and then is removed. The resultant basic nitrogen compound containing aqueous acid solution is removed from the bottom of the reactor and disposed.
This acid wash treatment is usually done at ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure, although temperatures in the range of 20 to 70°C and pressure in the range of 1.0 to 17.4 bars (1.0 to 17.2 atmospheres) can be used. The rate of flow of the acid solution will be 0.1 times to 3.0 times of the rate of flow of the sour hydrocarbon feed. Carrying out the acid wash under the above conditions will generally result in the removal of 60-95+ weight percent of the basic nitrogen compounds.
In order to more fully illustrate the advantages to be derived from the instant invention, the following examples are provided. It is to be understood that the examples are by way of illustration only.

EXAMPLE I

A macroreticular polymeric sulfonic acid resin was obtained from the Rohm and Haas Co. This resin is sold under the name Amberlite XE-372 and comes in the shape of spheres about 16-50 U.S. mesh size (1.19 mm to 297 micron diameter). The resin was used as received and was designated catalyst A.

EXAMPLE II

A macroreticular polymeric sulfonic acid resin was obtained from the Rohm and Haas Co. This resin is sold under the name Amberlyst 15 and comes in the shape of spheres about 16-50 U.S. mesh size (1.19 mm to 297 micron diameter). The resin was used as received and was designated catalyst B.

EXAMPLE III

A macroreticular polymeric sulfonic acid resin was obtained from the Rohm and Haas Co. This resin is sold under the name Amberlite 252 and comes in the shape of spheres about 16-50 U.S. mesh size (1.19 mm to 297 micron diameter). The resin was used as received and was designated catalyst C.

EXAMPLE IV

An intercalate compound consisting of antimony pentafluoride on graphite was obtained from Alfa Chemical Co. This catalyst was used as received and was designated catalyst D.

EXAMPLE V

A solid phosphoric acid catalyst was prepared by adding kieselguhr powder to an 85% polyphosphoric acid solution and mixing for 3-7 minutes. After formation of a consistent mixture the material was extruded, sized and dried at 380°C. This catalyst was designated catalyst E.

EXAMPLE VI

Catalyst F was prepared by passing BF₃ gas at an hourly space velocity of 700 hr⁻¹ over an anhydrous gamma alumina support for two hours. The catalyst was loaded into the reactor under a nitrogen atmosphere.
The catalysts of Example I to VI were studied in a test designed to evaluate the activity and durability of these catalysts.

The test involved loading a sample of the catalyst (50 cc) to be evaluated into a 0.5¨ by 6.5¨ (12.7 by 165.1 mm) catalyst reaction zone where it was supported by screens. In the standard test method, the reactor zone containing catalyst was purged with nitrogen for a sufficient time to remove all gaseous oxygen from the system. A sour hydrocarbon feedstock having the properties specified in Table 1 and containing approximately 200 weight ppm of mercaptans sulfur was fed under a nitrogen blanket to the catalyst zone in the liquid phase at a rate of 100 cc/hr, equivalent to a LHSV = 2.0 hr⁻¹. The reactor zone inlet temperature was controlled at 30°C and the reactor pressure was one atmosphere. Samples were taken for mercaptan analysis at regular intervals of 1 hour utilizing a nitrogen-purged sampling box. The temperature in the catalyst zone was measured hourly to determine the extent of the exothermic reaction versus time on stream. No addition of olefin was made to the feedstock.

Table 1

SOUR FCC GASOLINE PROPERTIES
Mercaptan Sulfur, wppm	193
Total Sulfur, wt %	0.32
A.P.I. Gravity, 60°F (15.6°C)	56.8
Aromatic content, %	29.0
Olefin content, %	24.9
Paraffin content, %	46.1
End Pt., °C	220°C

Results of the activity test as described in Example VII are presented in Table 2. Table 2

Catalyst I.D. Mercaptan Conversion,Percent

Catalyst A 88

Catalyst B 88

Catalyst C 18

Catalyst D 95

Catalyst E 93

Catalyst F 85
The results presented in the Table show that a variety of acidic catalysts will convert mercaptans to thioethers. Additionally, the data show that the antimony intercalate compound is the preferred catalyst.

EXAMPLE VII

A silica-alumina catalyst was prepared by binding mordenite zeolite in a gamma alumina binder. The mordenite content was 90%. The catalyst was evaluated as previously specified except as follows: 1) sour FCC gasoline containing 192 wppm mercaptan sulfur; 2) liquid hourly space velocity = 5; 3) temp = 50°C; 4) pressure = 18 atm.; 5) 1.6% isobutylene added. The results indicate that the mercaptan content was reduced by 20% through 10 total hours on stream.

EXAMPLE VIII

A new portion of catalyst A was evaluated according to the procedure specified hereinbefore, except for the following: 1) the sour hydrocarbon fraction was an FCC gasoline containing 355 ppm of mercaptans; 2) the liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) was 5; 3) the reactor temperature was 50°C; 4) the pressure was 9.3 bars (9.2 atm.); and 5) 13.6% weight percent of isobutylene added. The evaluation was carried out for forty hours to determine the durability of the catalyst. The result of this evaluation are presented in Figure 1. Figure 1 presents a graph of the amount of mercaptan left in the treated hydrocarbon fraction as a function of time. The results indicate that the catalyst is converting at least 235 ppm (66%) of the mercaptans to thioethers for the duration of the test.

EXAMPLE IX

During the evaluation of particular acid catalysts, it was found that deactivation of the catalyst was occurring. Extensive tests were performed to determine the causes of this deactivation and it was concluded that the acid catalyst can be deactivated by basic nitrogen compounds found in the sour hydrocarbon fraction. It was also discovered that an acid wash could remove most of the basic nitrogen compounds. This example presents durability results of an acid catalyst tested with an FCC gasoline that was given an acid wash and an FCC gasoline that was not given an acid wash.
A portion of an FCC gasoline was given an acid wash as follows. The acid wash of the FCC gasoline was performed batchwise with a 10 weight percent solution of aqueous HCl and an FCC gasoline/H₂O volumetric ratio of 4/1. The acid wash removed 67% of the nitrogen compounds (single-stage extraction) while reducing the thiol content only slightly from 193 wppm to 171 wppm mercaptan sulfur. This acid washed sour hydrocarbon fraction was treated using a new portion of catalyst B and the apparatus described in Example VII. Specifically, the operating conditions for this experiment were: 1) LHSV = 5.0; 2) Reactor temperature = 50°C; 3) pressure = 9.3 bars (9.2 atm.); and 4) 13.6 weight percent of isobutylene added.
A second portion of the same FCC gasoline was treated without an acid wash using a new portion of catalyst, but the same operating conditions as in the above paragraph. The results from both these experiments are presented in Figure 2. Figure 2 presents plots of mercaptan conversion to thioethers versus time on stream. The plots show that acid washing the sour hydrocarbon fraction prior to contacting it with the acid catalyst improves the durability of the catalyst. Thus, an acid wash is a means to improve the durability of the acid catalyst.

Claims

A non-oxidative process for sweetening a sour hydrocarbon fraction containing mercaptans by reacting the mercaptans contained in said sour hydrocarbon fraction with an unsaturated hydrocarbon in the presence of a catalyst under a non-oxidizing atmosphere, thereby converting said mercaptans to thioethers, and recovering the sweetened hydrocarbon fraction, characterized in that the catalyst is an acid catalyst consisting of an acidic inorganic oxide, a polymeric sulfonic acid resin, an intercalate compound, a boron halide or aluminum halide dispersed on alumina, a natural or synthetic zeolite, or boric acid or sulfuric acid or a phosphoric acid supported on an inorganic oxide support.
A process as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that mordenite, L-zeolite, omega-zeolite, X-zeolite, Y-zeolite, boron trifluoride dispersed on alumina or phosphoric acid dispersed on alumina is used as the acid catalyst.
A process as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that antimony pentafluoride on graphite or zirconium halide on graphite is used as the acid catalyst.
A process as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that a macroreticular sulfonic acid resin is used as the acid catalyst.
A process as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that alumina or silica-alumina is used as the acid catalyst.
A process as claimed in any of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the unsaturated hydrocarbon is present as a component of said sour hydrocarbon fraction in an amount at least equal to the molar amount of mercaptans present in said fraction.
A process as claimed in any of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the unsaturated hydrocarbon is added to said sour hydrocarbon fraction in a concentration of from at least the molar amount of the mercaptans in said sour hydrocarbon fraction to about 20 weight percent of the sour hydrocarbon fraction prior to contacting said sour hydrocarbon with said acid catalyst.
A process as claimed in any of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the unsaturated hydrocarbon contains a tertiary carbon atom.
A process as claimed in any of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the reaction is carried out at a temperature in the range of from 25° to 350°C, a pressure in the range of from 0.01 to 25 bars (0.01 to 25 atmospheres) and a LHSV in the range of from 1 to 10.
A process as claimed in any of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that the sour hydrocarbon fraction is treated to remove basic nitrogen compounds prior to contacting with the acid catalyst.