[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0345936A1 - Method of refining magnetic domains of electrical steels - Google Patents

Method of refining magnetic domains of electrical steels Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0345936A1
EP0345936A1 EP89304300A EP89304300A EP0345936A1 EP 0345936 A1 EP0345936 A1 EP 0345936A1 EP 89304300 A EP89304300 A EP 89304300A EP 89304300 A EP89304300 A EP 89304300A EP 0345936 A1 EP0345936 A1 EP 0345936A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
steel
contaminant
coating
base coating
annealing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP89304300A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0345936B1 (en
Inventor
Stuart Leslie Ames
Jeffrey Michael Breznak
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Allegheny Ludlum Corp
Original Assignee
Allegheny Ludlum Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US07/206,051 external-priority patent/US4904314A/en
Priority claimed from US07/205,711 external-priority patent/US4904313A/en
Application filed by Allegheny Ludlum Corp filed Critical Allegheny Ludlum Corp
Publication of EP0345936A1 publication Critical patent/EP0345936A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0345936B1 publication Critical patent/EP0345936B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F1/00Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties
    • H01F1/01Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials
    • H01F1/03Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity
    • H01F1/12Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials
    • H01F1/14Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials metals or alloys
    • H01F1/147Alloys characterised by their composition
    • H01F1/14766Fe-Si based alloys
    • H01F1/14775Fe-Si based alloys in the form of sheets
    • H01F1/14783Fe-Si based alloys in the form of sheets with insulating coating
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/12Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties
    • C21D8/1294Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties involving a localized treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C10/00Solid state diffusion of only metal elements or silicon into metallic material surfaces
    • C23C10/04Diffusion into selected surface areas, e.g. using masks
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C26/00Coating not provided for in groups C23C2/00 - C23C24/00

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for improving core loss by refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of electrical steels, particularly electrical steel sheet or strip.
  • Grain-oriented silicon steel is conventionally used in electrical applications, such as power transformers, distribution transformers, generators, and the like.
  • the ability of the steel to permit cyclic reversals of the applied magnetic field with only limited energy loss is a most important property. Reductions of this loss, which is termed "core loss”, is desirable.
  • the Goss secondary recrystallization texture (110) [001] in terms of Miller's indices, results in improved magnetic properties, particularly permeability and core loss over nonoriented silicon steels.
  • the Goss texture refers to the body-centered cubic lattice comprising the grain or crystal being oriented in the cube-on-edge position.
  • the texture or grain orientation of this type has a cube edge parallel to the rolling direction and in the plane of rolling, with the (110) plane being in the sheet plane.
  • steels having this orientation are characterized by a relatively high permeability in the rolling direction and a relatively low permeability in a direction at right angles thereto.
  • typical steps include providing a melt having of the order of 2-4.5% silicon, casting the melt, hot rolling, cold rolling the steel to final gauge e.g., of 7 to 14 mils (0.178 to 0.356 mm), typically of 7 or 9 mils (0.178 or 0.229 mm), with an intermediate annealing when two or more cold rollings are used, decarburizing the steel, applying a refractory oxide base coating, such as a magnesium oxide coating, to the steel, and final texture annealing the steel at elevated temperatures in order to produce the desired secondary recrystallization and purification treatment to remove impurities such as nitrogen and sulfur.
  • the development of the cube-on-edge orientation is dependent upon the mechanism of secondary recrystallization wherein during recrystallization, secondary cube-on-edge oriented grains are preferentially grown at the expense of primary grains having a different and undesirable orientation.
  • sheet and “strip” are used interchangeably and mean the same unless otherwise specified.
  • first, regular or conventional grain-oriented silicon steel, and second, high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel are generally characterized by permeabilities of less than 1850 at 10 Oersted (796 A/m) with a core loss of greater than 0.400 watts per pound (WPP) (0.88 watts/kg)at 1.5 Tesla at 60 Hertz for nominally 9-mil (0.229mm) material.
  • WPP watts per pound
  • High permeability grain-oriented silicon steels are characterized by higher permeabilities which may be the result of compositional changes alone or together with process changes.
  • high permeability silicon steels may contain nitrides, sulfides, and/or borides which contribute to the precipitates and inclusions of the inhibition system which contributes to the properties of the final steel product.
  • high permeability silicon steels generally undergo cold reduction operations to final gauge wherein a final heavy cold reduction of the order of greater than 80% is made in order to facilitate the grain orientation. While such higher permeability materials are desirable, such materials tend to produce larger magnetic domains than conventional material. Generally, larger domains are deleterious to core loss.
  • domain size and thereby core loss values of electrical steels may be reduced is if the steel is subjected to any of various practices designed to induce localized strains in the surface of the steel.
  • Such practices may be generally referred to as "domain refining by scribing" and are performed after the final high temperature annealing operation. If the steel is scribed after the final texture annealing, then there is induced a localized stress state in the texture-annealed sheet so that the domain wall spacing is reduced.
  • These disturbances typically are relatively narrow, straight lines, or scribes, generally spaced at regular intervals. The scribe lines are substantially transverse to the rolling direction and typically are applied to only one side of the steel.
  • the method includes imparting a strain to the sheet, forming an intruder on the grain-oriented sheet, the intruder being of a different component or structure than the electrical sheet and doing so either prior to or after straining and thereafter annealing such as in a hydrogen reducing atmosphere to result in imparting the intruders into the steel body.
  • Numerous metals and nonmetals are identified as suitable intruder materials.
  • Japanese Patent Document 61-133321A discloses removing surface coatings from final texture annealed magnetic steel sheet, forming permeable material coating on the sheet and heat treating to form material having components or structure different than those of the steel matrix at intervals which provide heat resistant domain refinement.
  • Japanese Patent Document 61-139-679A discloses a process of coating final texture annealed oriented magnetic steel sheet in the form of linear or spot shapes, at intervals with at least one compound selected from the group of phosphoric acid, phosphates, boric acid, borates, sulfates, nitrates, and silicates, and thereafter baking at 300-1200°C, and forming a penetrated body different from that of the steel to refine the magnetic domains.
  • Japanese Patent Document 61-284529A discloses a method of removing the surface coatings from final texture annealed magnetic steel sheets at intervals, coating one or more of zinc, zinc alloys, and zincated alloy at specific coating weights, coating with one or more of metals having a lower vapor pressure than zinc, forming impregnated bodies different from the steel in composition or in structure at intervals by heat treatment or insulating film coating treatment to refine the magnetic domains.
  • Japanese Patent Document 62-51202 discloses a process for improving the core loss of silicon steel by removing the forsterite film formed after final finish annealing, and adhering different metal, such as copper, nickel, antimony by heating.
  • What is needed is a method for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon steel, having a base coating e.g., of forsterite, thereon, which is heat resistant.
  • the method should be compatible with conventional processing of regular and high permeability silicon steels and should use the thermally insulative coating, e.g., the forsterite base coating, on the sheet to facilitate the domain refinement. Still further, the method should be useful with numerous techniques including conventional methods for removing the base coating in selected patterns
  • the invention provides a method and a semi-finished steel sheet or strip product as defined in the appended claims.
  • a method for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet or strip having an insulation base coating including removing portions of the base coating to expose a line pattern of the underlying silicon steel, and applying a metallic contaminant to the silicon steel.
  • the metallic contaminant may be copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof.
  • the exposed steel is free of thermal and plastic stresses and is not dependent on such stresses to be effectively domain refined.
  • the steel and contaminant thereon are annealed at time and temperature of 1400 °F (760°C) or more in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled amounts of contaminant into the exposed steel to produce lines of permanent pores to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss in substantially stress-free steel.
  • a barrier coating of phosphorus or silicate, or combinations or compounds thereof, is applied to the steel sheet for sealing the base coating prior to applying said metallic contaminant.
  • the method of the present invention relates to a method for refinement of the domain structure of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having relatively large grain sizes by controlled surface chemical contamination.
  • the method takes final textured annealed silicon steel as the starting sheet material, having the electrically and thermally insulating base coating in place, and then by any of numerous techniques, locally removes the coating to expose the bare metal. No plastic strain or stress of any sort needs to be imposed on the metal and thereafter the exposed bare metal is contaminated by other materials on the areas of the exposed metal pattern.
  • the steel is then annealed to diffuse or alloy the contaminant into the iron-silicon steel sheet product.
  • the resulting domain refinement is heat resistant as it survives stress relief annealing.
  • the starting material for the chemical striping process of the present invention is final textured annealed grain-oriented silicon steel having an insulative coating in place.
  • Such an insulative coating can be the conventional base coating, also called forsterite or mill glass coating.
  • the as-­scrubbed final texture annealed grain-oriented silicon steels may be used.
  • Such steels may be of the regular or conventional grain-oriented silicon steels or of high permeability grain-oriented silicon steels.
  • the particular compositions of such steels are not critical to the present invention and they may be conventional compositions.
  • the steel melts initially contained the nominal composition as follows: C N Mn S Si Cu B Fe Steel 1 .030 ⁇ 50ppm .038 .017 3.15 .30 10ppm Bal. Steel 2 .030 50ppm .07 .022 3.15 .22 -- Bal. Steel 3 .038 45ppm .078 .026 3.25 .25 5-6ppm Bal.
  • Steel 1 is a high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel and Steel 2 is a conventional grain-­oriented silicon steel and Steel 3 is a modified conventional grain-oriented silicon steel. As used herein, all compositions are by weight percent, unless otherwise specified.
  • Steels 1, 2 and 3 were produced by casting, hot rolling, normalizing, cold rolling to final gauge with an intermediate annealing when two or more cold rolling stages were used, decarburizing, coating with MgO, and final texture annealing to achieve the desired secondary recrystallization of cube-on-edge orientation.
  • a refractory oxide base coating containing primarily magnesium oxide was applied before final texture annealing at elevated temperature; such annealing caused a reaction at the steel surface to create a forsterite base coating.
  • the steel melts of Steels 1, 2, and 3 initially contained the nominal compositions recited above, after final texture annealing, the C, N and S were reduced to trace levels of less than about 0.001% by weight.
  • the coating it is important that portions of the coating be removed to expose a line or stripe pattern in the underlying silicon steel. How the coating is removed is not critical to the present invention except that the underlying steel need not be subjected to any mechanical, thermal, or other stresses and strains as a result of the coating removal operation. In other words, the exposed steel must be free of any thermal and plastic stresses prior to any subsequent steps of applying the metallic contaminant.
  • An advantage of the present invention is that any of various techniques may be used to remove the selected portions of the base coating. For example, conventional mechanical scribing or laser means may be used to develop a controlled pattern of markings on the strip surface.
  • the line or stripe pattern selected for the removed base coating may be conventional patterns used in prior art scribing techniques.
  • the pattern may comprise removing the coating in generally parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel having a line width and spacing as may be conventional.
  • Other patterns may also be useful, depending on whether the grain-oriented silicon steel is of the cube-on-edge, cube-on-face, or other orientation.
  • the exposed silicon steel would be plated or coated by selected metals and metal alloys.
  • the metals are selected such that they have a diffusion rate slower than iron in silicon steels.
  • the metals and metal alloys suitable for the present invention are referred to as contaminant or diffuser materials.
  • contaminant refers to those certain suitable metal and metal alloys selectively applied to the exposed areas of steel sheet in accordance with this invention. It has been found that various metallic contaminants may be used selected from copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof. The metallic contaminants may be applied as a coating to the silicon steel using various conventional means such as electroless deposition or electrolytic plating.
  • the metallic contaminant can only be applied in the selected line pattern or stripes which conform to the pattern of base coating removal. What is important at this point is that the base glass insulation on the silicon steel facilitates selective deposition of the metallic contaminant in the predetermined or preselected pattern.
  • the silicon steel having the selected portions of base coating removed and having the metallic contaminant applied is thereafter annealed at a time and temperature in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled amounts of contaminant into the exposed steel to produce permanent pores to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss.
  • the annealing has the effect of a diffusion anneal to cause minor alloying of the metallic contaminant with the iron-­silicon steel sheet to effect heat resistant domain refinement.
  • the annealing temperature ranges from about 1400°F (760°C) or more and may range up to 2100°F (1150°C). Preferably, the temperatures range up to 1800°F (982°C) and more preferably, from about 1400 to 1700°F (760 to 927°C).
  • the anneal temperature be at least equal to or greater than the temperature that would normally be used for a stress relief anneal in order that the property effects developed would be stable with respect to any subsequent lower temperature treatment such as a stress relief anneal (SRA).
  • SRA stress relief anneal
  • the time for the anneal may range up to 20 hours and preferably may range from 30 minutes to 5 hours at a temperature sufficient to produce the magnetic domain refining.
  • the diffusion anneal should be higher than a conventional stress relief anneal of about 1425°F (774°C) which may be used by transformer manufacturers following fabrication.
  • Temperatures of the order of up to 1650°F (899°C) are sufficient to effect the heat resistant domain refinement without requiring an additional separator coating to prevent adjacent coil laps from thermally welding together during the annealing. Lower temperature anneals may also be successful.
  • substantially complete homogeneity is a highly desirable condition for soft magnetic materials. It has been found that proper time and temperature develops and stabilizes the permanent pores and further diffuses the contaminants into the steel to provide a substantially homogeneous steel sheet throughout the steel thickness. Generally, annealing at the higher temperatures facilitates homogeneity.
  • the strip may be annealed either in coil form or as a strand anneal of the continuously moving strip following the application of the metallic contaminant.
  • Epstein packs of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having the composition of steel 1 were mechanically scribed in the as-scrubbed condition.
  • the scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip.
  • Each Epstein pack had twelve (12) strips, and each strip was 3 cm wide and had the scribe lines spaced at about 5 mm intervals.
  • a stress relief anneal at 1500°F (816°C) for two hours was performed.
  • the samples were then electrolytically plated with copper using the copper solution described in Table I and subsequently annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for 5 hours in a protective atmosphere to diffuse the metallic contaminant into the silicon steel sheet body. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to initial properties.
  • the magnetic properties were determined in a conventional manner for Epstein packs. TABLE II Epstein Pack Initial As-Scrubbed Mechanically Scribed 2 hr. at 1500°F Stress-Relief Anneal Chemically-Striped (Copper) + 1650°/5 hr.
  • the samples demonstrate a permanent core loss improvement indicating a heat-resistant domain refinement in each sample.
  • Such samples confirm that thermal or plastic deformation of the exposed silicon steel plays no role in heat resistant domain refinement.
  • Figure 1 is a Scanning Electron Microscope photomicrograph of a groove, i.e. the silicon steel exposed through the base coating, filled with copper after plating the sample with copper.
  • Figure 2 is a 150X photograph of an x-ray map showing copper in the line pattern of the silicon steel sample.
  • Single-strip Epstein samples 8 mils (0.2mm) thick by 3 cm wide of the steel composition of Example I were subjected to a chemical pickling in HCl-1% HF acid to remove all of the insulative base coating from the texture annealed strips.
  • a plastic stencil with slits was attached to the steel surface, such that the pattern of slits formed substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip as in Example I.
  • Each sample with the stencil thereon was electroplated with copper as described in Example I, and then annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for 2 hours (with the stencil removed) to diffuse the metallic contaminant into the silicon steel body. Percentages in parentheses indicate changes compared to original properties.
  • Results shown in Table III show considerably improved properties of core loss after the diffusion anneal although the samples at no stage were subjected to a plastic deformation or stress.
  • the improved properties demonstrate unequivocally that plastic deformation plays no role in domain refining by chemical striping in accordance with the present invention.
  • Single strips of a high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel of the steel described in Examples I and II were mechanically scribed or in some cases electrically discharge scribed in the as-scrubbed condition.
  • the scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip.
  • the lines were about 3 mm wide on single strip 8-mil (0.2 mm) Epstein samples and spaced at about 5 mm intervals
  • the samples were then electrolytically plated with various metallic contaminants from the plating solutions listed in Table I. the plating resulted in the grooves in the base coating being at least half filled with the metallic contaminant, as judged under a microscope. After plating, the samples were diffusion annealed as indicated in a substantially hydrogen atmosphere.
  • the steels exhibited improvement in core loss properties at both 1.5 and 1.7 Tesla with little or no loss in permeability. Since the samples were heated at temperature above typical 1425°F (774°C) stress relief annealing, the core loss improvements were permanent with respect to heating at that temperature. In other words, the improvements were "heat proof".
  • Epstein packs were then subjected to a further anneal at 2100°F (1150°C) for 2 hours or 10 hours as indicated. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to initial properties. TABLE V Sample No. Initial Properties Chemically-Striped with 1650°F/5 hr.
  • the metal contaminants chosen will perform as expected if the diffusion rates are slower than the self-diffusion rate of iron in the ferrous base alloy. Furthermore, the slower the rate of the diffusion through iron, the more suitable the metal may be as a contaminant to produce the permanent porosity. For example, copper is of the order of 4 times slower than iron in diffusion through iron. Nickel is of the order of 500 times slower. Such metallic elements having slower diffusion rates in iron should result in the Kirkendall porosity phenomenon and the benefits of the present invention.
  • the use of an additional sealant coating or barrier coating applied to the forsterite before applying the metallic contaminant to the exposed silicon steel stripes results in a striking improvement in consistency and reproduceability to effect heat resistant domain refinement
  • the main purpose of introducing the barrier coating in the process is to seal the pores and cracks in the forsterite coating.
  • Table VI identifies several coatings which are believed to be useful in acting as a barrier coating in accordance with the present invention. The similarity between all of these coatings is that they are all water soluble and cure at relatively low temperatures.
  • these barriers coatings contain phosphorus or silicates, or combinations or compounds thereof as the primary constituent of the coating.
  • the coating primary constituent is a metal phosphate or metal silicate, and more preferably, the coating should be one that when cured sets up essentially as a magnesium phosphate layer.
  • TABLE VI Designation Barrier Coating and Conditions Concentration SC Phosphoric Acid (85%) 202 gm/l Magnesium Oxide 22 gm/l Nalcoag (1050) 318 ml/l Chromic Trioxide 46 gm/l Water Balance Cured: 1000°F (538 o C) - 1 min.(air) CS Sodium Silicate (40-42 Be) 500 ml/l Water Balance Cured: 800°F (427 o C) - 1 min.(air) PS Phosphoric Acid (85%) 120 gm/l Magnesium Oxide 18 gm/l Kasil #1 22 gm/l Ammonium Hydroxide (58%) 21 ml/l Chromic Trioxide .34 gm/l Kunol (2%) 1.0 ml/l Water Balance
  • Tests were performed to demonstrate the effect of the barrier coating on enhancing the heat resistant domain refinement process. All of the samples were obtained from various heats of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge silicon steel having the typical composition of Steel 1. Single strips of Steel 1 were mechanically scribed into the as-scribed condition. The scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip. The lines were about 0.25 mm wide and spaced at about 5 mm intervals. Each sample was then coated with barrier coating "P" from Table VI after the step of removing the base coating. All of the samples were thereafter electroplated with either zinc or copper from the plating solution listed in Table I. The magnetic properties are Epstein single strip results from strips of 30 x 3 cm.
  • Table VII presents data which shows that most of the samples had an attractive improvement in core loss averaging of the order of 10 to 12%.
  • samples from the same batches of material were capable of providing 15-20% improvement in core losses by conventional mechanical scribing techniques.
  • a further advantage of the present invention is that such improvement in core loss may be the result of heat resistant domain refinement.
  • the data of Table VIII show that the domain refining process of the present invention can reduce the core loss in 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge material of Steel 1 by up to 11% when compared to initial properties. The best improvement was obtained with the contaminant copper.
  • the core loss is 7-mil [0.18mm) 1 material of Steel 2 was reduced by about 5° at 1.5T and by 5% at 1.7T.
  • the core loss in 7-mil (0.18mm) material of Steel 3 was reduced by about 7% at 1.5T and by about 4% at 1.7T.
  • the magnetic properties are Epstein single strip results of nominally 8-mil (0.2 mm) strip of 30 x 3 cm. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to original properties.
  • the barrier coating not only seals the pores and cracks in the base coating of the grain-oriented silicon steel, but it also acts synergistically with the major contaminant in the striped area of the steel during and after the diffusion anneal.
  • zinc or nickel-tin as the major contaminant phosphorus was evident in the permanent defect produced in the steel.
  • a further advantage of the method of the present invention is the ability to remove portions of the base coating to expose a pattern of the underlying silicon steel such as in lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction by any conventional or unconventional means provided that the steel exposed through the base coating is free from thermal and plastic stresses.
  • the barrier coating enhances the core loss improvements and the reproduceability of such improvements.
  • An advantage of the present invention is that a semifinished sheet product having a barrier coating and metallic contaminant can be produced for subsequent annealing by the customer before or after fabricating into transformer cores.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Steel Electrode Plates (AREA)
  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
  • Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

A method is provided for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having an insulation base coating thereon by removing portions of the base coating to expose a line pattern of the underlying silicon steel substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel, applying a metallic contaminant to the steel, the exposed steel being free of thermal and plastic stresses, and thereafter annealing the steel and contaminant thereon at time and temperatures of about 1400°F or more in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled amounts of the contaminant into the steel to produce a permanent pore to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduce core loss. A barrier coating may be applied to the base coating to seal the base coating prior to applying the metallic contaminant.

Description

  • This invention relates to a method for improving core loss by refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of electrical steels, particularly electrical steel sheet or strip.
  • Grain-oriented silicon steel is conventionally used in electrical applications, such as power transformers, distribution transformers, generators, and the like. The ability of the steel to permit cyclic reversals of the applied magnetic field with only limited energy loss is a most important property. Reductions of this loss, which is termed "core loss", is desirable.
  • In the manufacture of grain-oriented silicon steel, it is known that the Goss secondary recrystallization texture, (110) [001] in terms of Miller's indices, results in improved magnetic properties, particularly permeability and core loss over nonoriented silicon steels. The Goss texture refers to the body-centered cubic lattice comprising the grain or crystal being oriented in the cube-on-edge position. The texture or grain orientation of this type has a cube edge parallel to the rolling direction and in the plane of rolling, with the (110) plane being in the sheet plane. As is well known, steels having this orientation are characterized by a relatively high permeability in the rolling direction and a relatively low permeability in a direction at right angles thereto.
  • In the manufacture of grain-oriented silicon steel, typical steps include providing a melt having of the order of 2-4.5% silicon, casting the melt, hot rolling, cold rolling the steel to final gauge e.g., of 7 to 14 mils (0.178 to 0.356 mm), typically of 7 or 9 mils (0.178 or 0.229 mm), with an intermediate annealing when two or more cold rollings are used, decarburizing the steel, applying a refractory oxide base coating, such as a magnesium oxide coating, to the steel, and final texture annealing the steel at elevated temperatures in order to produce the desired secondary recrystallization and purification treatment to remove impurities such as nitrogen and sulfur. The development of the cube-on-edge orientation is dependent upon the mechanism of secondary recrystallization wherein during recrystallization, secondary cube-on-edge oriented grains are preferentially grown at the expense of primary grains having a different and undesirable orientation.
  • As used herein, "sheet" and "strip" are used interchangeably and mean the same unless otherwise specified.
  • It is also known that through the efforts of many prior art workers, cube-on-edge grain-oriented silicon steels generally fall into two basic categories: first, regular or conventional grain-oriented silicon steel, and second, high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel. Regular grain-oriented silicon steel is generally characterized by permeabilities of less than 1850 at 10 Oersted (796 A/m) with a core loss of greater than 0.400 watts per pound (WPP) (0.88 watts/kg)at 1.5 Tesla at 60 Hertz for nominally 9-mil (0.229mm) material. High permeability grain-oriented silicon steels are characterized by higher permeabilities which may be the result of compositional changes alone or together with process changes. For example, high permeability silicon steels may contain nitrides, sulfides, and/or borides which contribute to the precipitates and inclusions of the inhibition system which contributes to the properties of the final steel product. Furthermore such high permeability silicon steels generally undergo cold reduction operations to final gauge wherein a final heavy cold reduction of the order of greater than 80% is made in order to facilitate the grain orientation. While such higher permeability materials are desirable, such materials tend to produce larger magnetic domains than conventional material. Generally, larger domains are deleterious to core loss.
  • It is known that one of the ways that domain size and thereby core loss values of electrical steels may be reduced is if the steel is subjected to any of various practices designed to induce localized strains in the surface of the steel. Such practices may be generally referred to as "domain refining by scribing" and are performed after the final high temperature annealing operation. If the steel is scribed after the final texture annealing, then there is induced a localized stress state in the texture-annealed sheet so that the domain wall spacing is reduced. These disturbances typically are relatively narrow, straight lines, or scribes, generally spaced at regular intervals. The scribe lines are substantially transverse to the rolling direction and typically are applied to only one side of the steel.
  • In fabricating these electrical steels into transformers, the steel inevitably suffers some deterioration in core loss quality due to cutting, bending, and construction of cores during fabrication, all of which impart undesirable stresses in the material. During fabrication incident to the production of stacked core transformers and, more particularly, in the power transformers of the United States, the deterioration in core loss quality due to fabrication is not so severe that a stress relief anneal (SRA) is essential to restore usable properties. For such end uses there is a need for a flat, domain-refined silicon steel which need not be subjected to stress relief annealing. In other words, the scribed steel used for this purpose does not have to possess domain refinement which is heat resistant.
  • However, during the fabrication incident to the production of most distribution transformers in the United States, the steel strip is cut and subjected to various bending and shaping operations which produce much more worked stresses in the steel than in the case of power transformers. In such instances, it is necessary and conventional for manufacturers to stress relief anneal (SRA) the product to relieve such stresses. During stress relief annealing, it has been found that the beneficial effect on core loss resulting from some scribing techniques, such as mechanical and thermal scribing, are lost. For such end uses, it is required and desired that the product exhibit heat resistant domain refinement (HRDR) in order to retain the improvements in core loss values resulting from scribing.
  • It has been suggested in prior patent art that contaminants or intruders may be effective in refining the magnetic domain wall spacing or grain-oriented silicon steel. U.S. Patent 3,990,923 - Takashina et al, dated November 9, 1976, discloses that chemical treatment may be used on primary recrystallized silicon steel to control or inhibit the growth of secondary recrystallization grains. British Patent Application 2,167,324A discloses a method of subdividing magnetic domains of grain-oriented silicon steels to survive an (SRA). The method includes imparting a strain to the sheet, forming an intruder on the grain-oriented sheet, the intruder being of a different component or structure than the electrical sheet and doing so either prior to or after straining and thereafter annealing such as in a hydrogen reducing atmosphere to result in imparting the intruders into the steel body. Numerous metals and nonmetals are identified as suitable intruder materials.
  • Japanese Patent Document 61-133321A discloses removing surface coatings from final texture annealed magnetic steel sheet, forming permeable material coating on the sheet and heat treating to form material having components or structure different than those of the steel matrix at intervals which provide heat resistant domain refinement.
  • Japanese Patent Document 61-139-679A discloses a process of coating final texture annealed oriented magnetic steel sheet in the form of linear or spot shapes, at intervals with at least one compound selected from the group of phosphoric acid, phosphates, boric acid, borates, sulfates, nitrates, and silicates, and thereafter baking at 300-1200°C, and forming a penetrated body different from that of the steel to refine the magnetic domains.
  • Japanese Patent Document 61-284529A discloses a method of removing the surface coatings from final texture annealed magnetic steel sheets at intervals, coating one or more of zinc, zinc alloys, and zincated alloy at specific coating weights, coating with one or more of metals having a lower vapor pressure than zinc, forming impregnated bodies different from the steel in composition or in structure at intervals by heat treatment or insulating film coating treatment to refine the magnetic domains.
  • Japanese Patent Document 62-51202 discloses a process for improving the core loss of silicon steel by removing the forsterite film formed after final finish annealing, and adhering different metal, such as copper, nickel, antimony by heating.
  • What is needed is a method for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon steel, having a base coating e.g., of forsterite, thereon, which is heat resistant. The method should be compatible with conventional processing of regular and high permeability silicon steels and should use the thermally insulative coating, e.g., the forsterite base coating, on the sheet to facilitate the domain refinement. Still further, the method should be useful with numerous techniques including conventional methods for removing the base coating in selected patterns
  • The invention provides a method and a semi-finished steel sheet or strip product as defined in the appended claims.
  • Broadly, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet or strip having an insulation base coating, the method including removing portions of the base coating to expose a line pattern of the underlying silicon steel, and applying a metallic contaminant to the silicon steel. The metallic contaminant may be copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof. The exposed steel is free of thermal and plastic stresses and is not dependent on such stresses to be effectively domain refined. Thereafter the steel and contaminant thereon are annealed at time and temperature of 1400 °F (760°C) or more in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled amounts of contaminant into the exposed steel to produce lines of permanent pores to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss in substantially stress-free steel.
  • According to an embodiment of the invention a barrier coating of phosphorus or silicate, or combinations or compounds thereof, is applied to the steel sheet for sealing the base coating prior to applying said metallic contaminant.
  • The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 is a photomicrograph of a copper-filled groove in the silicon steel base coating in accordance with the present invention.
    • Figure 2 is a 150X photograph of an X-ray map of copper of Figure 1.
    • Figure 3 is a 3000X photomicrograph of a silicon steel after diffusion anneal showing porosity in accordance with the present invention.
    • Figure 4 is a 30X photomicrograph illustrating nodules of antimony on a steel surface.
    • Figures 5 and 6 are photomicrographs in cross section on Ni-Sn strip.
    • Figures 7 to 10 are 3000X photographs of X-ray maps of nickel, tin, phosphorus, and iron in the Ni-Sn strip in the steel.
  • Broadly, the method of the present invention relates to a method for refinement of the domain structure of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having relatively large grain sizes by controlled surface chemical contamination. The method takes final textured annealed silicon steel as the starting sheet material, having the electrically and thermally insulating base coating in place, and then by any of numerous techniques, locally removes the coating to expose the bare metal. No plastic strain or stress of any sort needs to be imposed on the metal and thereafter the exposed bare metal is contaminated by other materials on the areas of the exposed metal pattern. The steel is then annealed to diffuse or alloy the contaminant into the iron-silicon steel sheet product. The resulting domain refinement is heat resistant as it survives stress relief annealing.
  • The starting material for the chemical striping process of the present invention is final textured annealed grain-oriented silicon steel having an insulative coating in place. Such an insulative coating can be the conventional base coating, also called forsterite or mill glass coating. Preferably, the as-­scrubbed final texture annealed grain-oriented silicon steels may be used. Such steels may be of the regular or conventional grain-oriented silicon steels or of high permeability grain-oriented silicon steels. The particular compositions of such steels are not critical to the present invention and they may be conventional compositions. As used herein the steel melts initially contained the nominal composition as follows:
    C N Mn S Si Cu B Fe
    Steel 1 .030 <50ppm .038 .017 3.15 .30 10ppm Bal.
    Steel 2 .030 50ppm .07 .022 3.15 .22 -- Bal.
    Steel 3 .038 45ppm .078 .026 3.25 .25 5-6ppm Bal.
  • Steel 1 is a high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel and Steel 2 is a conventional grain-­oriented silicon steel and Steel 3 is a modified conventional grain-oriented silicon steel. As used herein, all compositions are by weight percent, unless otherwise specified.
  • Steels 1, 2 and 3 were produced by casting, hot rolling, normalizing, cold rolling to final gauge with an intermediate annealing when two or more cold rolling stages were used, decarburizing, coating with MgO, and final texture annealing to achieve the desired secondary recrystallization of cube-on-edge orientation. After decarburizing the steel, a refractory oxide base coating containing primarily magnesium oxide was applied before final texture annealing at elevated temperature; such annealing caused a reaction at the steel surface to create a forsterite base coating. Although the steel melts of Steels 1, 2, and 3 initially contained the nominal compositions recited above, after final texture annealing, the C, N and S were reduced to trace levels of less than about 0.001% by weight.
  • In accordance with the present invention, it is important that portions of the coating be removed to expose a line or stripe pattern in the underlying silicon steel. How the coating is removed is not critical to the present invention except that the underlying steel need not be subjected to any mechanical, thermal, or other stresses and strains as a result of the coating removal operation. In other words, the exposed steel must be free of any thermal and plastic stresses prior to any subsequent steps of applying the metallic contaminant. An advantage of the present invention is that any of various techniques may be used to remove the selected portions of the base coating. For example, conventional mechanical scribing or laser means may be used to develop a controlled pattern of markings on the strip surface. The line or stripe pattern selected for the removed base coating may be conventional patterns used in prior art scribing techniques. Preferably, the pattern may comprise removing the coating in generally parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel having a line width and spacing as may be conventional. Other patterns may also be useful, depending on whether the grain-oriented silicon steel is of the cube-on-edge, cube-on-face, or other orientation.
  • In accordance with the present invention, the exposed silicon steel would be plated or coated by selected metals and metal alloys. Preferably the metals are selected such that they have a diffusion rate slower than iron in silicon steels. The metals and metal alloys suitable for the present invention are referred to as contaminant or diffuser materials. As used herein, "contaminant" refers to those certain suitable metal and metal alloys selectively applied to the exposed areas of steel sheet in accordance with this invention. It has been found that various metallic contaminants may be used selected from copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof. The metallic contaminants may be applied as a coating to the silicon steel using various conventional means such as electroless deposition or electrolytic plating. Because of the insulative nature of the base coating, the metallic contaminant can only be applied in the selected line pattern or stripes which conform to the pattern of base coating removal. What is important at this point is that the base glass insulation on the silicon steel facilitates selective deposition of the metallic contaminant in the predetermined or preselected pattern.
  • The silicon steel having the selected portions of base coating removed and having the metallic contaminant applied is thereafter annealed at a time and temperature in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled amounts of contaminant into the exposed steel to produce permanent pores to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss. The annealing has the effect of a diffusion anneal to cause minor alloying of the metallic contaminant with the iron-­silicon steel sheet to effect heat resistant domain refinement. The annealing temperature ranges from about 1400°F (760°C) or more and may range up to 2100°F (1150°C). Preferably, the temperatures range up to 1800°F (982°C) and more preferably, from about 1400 to 1700°F (760 to 927°C).
  • It is desirable that the anneal temperature be at least equal to or greater than the temperature that would normally be used for a stress relief anneal in order that the property effects developed would be stable with respect to any subsequent lower temperature treatment such as a stress relief anneal (SRA). In other words, the improvements in core loss would be the result of heat resistant domain refinement. The time for the anneal may range up to 20 hours and preferably may range from 30 minutes to 5 hours at a temperature sufficient to produce the magnetic domain refining. As a practical consideration, the diffusion anneal should be higher than a conventional stress relief anneal of about 1425°F (774°C) which may be used by transformer manufacturers following fabrication. Temperatures of the order of up to 1650°F (899°C) are sufficient to effect the heat resistant domain refinement without requiring an additional separator coating to prevent adjacent coil laps from thermally welding together during the annealing. Lower temperature anneals may also be successful.
  • As is known, substantially complete homogeneity is a highly desirable condition for soft magnetic materials. It has been found that proper time and temperature develops and stabilizes the permanent pores and further diffuses the contaminants into the steel to provide a substantially homogeneous steel sheet throughout the steel thickness. Generally, annealing at the higher temperatures facilitates homogeneity. For all annealing in accordance with the present invention, the strip may be annealed either in coil form or as a strand anneal of the continuously moving strip following the application of the metallic contaminant.
  • In order to better understand the present invention, the following examples are presented. Unless otherwise stated, the metallic contaminants used in the examples hereof were selected from the plating solutions described in Table I and were electrolytically plated. TABLE I
    Plating Metal Solutions and Conditions
    Tin Stannous Sulfate 80 gm/l
    Sulfuric Acid 52 ml/l
    Ambient Temperature
    Stainless or Tin Anodes
    *.125 A/in² (1.94 A/dm²); 1 min.
    Nickel Nickel Sulfate 328 gm/l
    Nickel Chloride 60 gm/l
    Boric Acid 211 gm/l
    Temperature 130°F
    Nickel Anodes
    *.25 A/in² (3.88 A/dm²); 15-30 secs.
    Copper Copper Cyanide 24 gm/l
    Sodium Cyanide 39 gm/l
    Sodium Hydroxide 39 gm/l
    Ambient Temperature
    Copper Anodes
    *.25 A/in² (3.88 A/dm²); 30-60 secs.
    Zinc Zinc Sulfate 375 gm/l
    Ammonium Chloride 16 gm/l
    Temperature 100°F
    Stainless Anodes
    *.25 A/in² (3.88 A/dm²); 30 secs.
    Ni-Sn Stannous Chloride 53 gm/l
    Nickel Chloride 328 gm/l
    Ammonium Bifluoride 62 gm/l
    Ammonium Hydroxide (to give pH 2.5)
    Temperature 150°F
    Stainless or Nickel Anodes
    *0.2 A/in² (3.1 A/dm²); 1½ mins.
    Antimony Antimony Oxide 60 gm/l
    Hydrofluoric Acid (48%) 120 ml/l
    Beta-napthol 1 eyedrop/l
    Ambient Temperature
    Stainless Anodes
    *.07 A/in² (1.09 A/dm²); 2 mins.
    *Current density pertains to total strip area.
  • Example I
  • Two Epstein packs of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having the composition of steel 1 were mechanically scribed in the as-scrubbed condition. The scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip. Each Epstein pack had twelve (12) strips, and each strip was 3 cm wide and had the scribe lines spaced at about 5 mm intervals. Immediately following the mechanical scribing, a stress relief anneal at 1500°F (816°C) for two hours was performed. The samples were then electrolytically plated with copper using the copper solution described in Table I and subsequently annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for 5 hours in a protective atmosphere to diffuse the metallic contaminant into the silicon steel sheet body. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to initial properties. The magnetic properties were determined in a conventional manner for Epstein packs. TABLE II
    Epstein Pack Initial As-Scrubbed Mechanically Scribed 2 hr. at 1500°F Stress-Relief Anneal Chemically-Striped (Copper) + 1650°/5 hr. Anneal
    Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss
    @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T @1.7T
    (wpp) (wpp (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp)
    B 1935 .417 .561 1932 .359 .489 1935 .416 .559 1933 .388 .525
    (-7%) (-6%)
    C 1938 .416 .556 1935 .356 .481 1937 .410 .551 1936 .391 .529
    (-6%) (-5%)
  • As shown by the data in Table II, the mechanical scribing resulted in some core loss improvement as would be expected, resulting from some plastic deformation damage to the underlying silicon steel. Such improvement was not thermally stable and after the 1500°F (816°C) stress relief anneal the plastic deformation was removed and the properties returned substantially to their initial unscribed values of the base-coated final texture annealed silicon steel. The steel exhibited only the pattern of exposed underlying metal. The chemical striping treatment in accordance with the present invention with copper followed by the diffusion anneal at 1650°F (899°C) shows a significant core loss improvement averaging about 6% and clearly demonstrates the chemical striping of the present invention can be effective independent of any plastic or thermal stress or deformation of the steel. Furthermore, following a subsequent stress relief anneal at 1450°F (788°C) for 2 hours, the samples demonstrate a permanent core loss improvement indicating a heat-resistant domain refinement in each sample. Such samples confirm that thermal or plastic deformation of the exposed silicon steel plays no role in heat resistant domain refinement.
  • Figure 1 is a Scanning Electron Microscope photomicrograph of a groove, i.e. the silicon steel exposed through the base coating, filled with copper after plating the sample with copper. Figure 2 is a 150X photograph of an x-ray map showing copper in the line pattern of the silicon steel sample.
  • Example II
  • Single-strip Epstein samples 8 mils (0.2mm) thick by 3 cm wide of the steel composition of Example I were subjected to a chemical pickling in HCℓ-1% HF acid to remove all of the insulative base coating from the texture annealed strips. A plastic stencil with slits was attached to the steel surface, such that the pattern of slits formed substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip as in Example I. Each sample with the stencil thereon was electroplated with copper as described in Example I, and then annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for 2 hours (with the stencil removed) to diffuse the metallic contaminant into the silicon steel body. Percentages in parentheses indicate changes compared to original properties. The magnetic properties were determined in a conventional manner for single strip tests. TABLE III
    Sample No. Original Properties Chemically-Striped with copper + 2 hr./1650°F anneal
    Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss
    @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T @1.7T
    160/163/9 1912 .437 .544 1913 .385 .525
    (-12%) (-3%)
    160/163/10 1935 .449 .579 1946 .422 .567
    (-6%) (-2%)
    160/163/11 1921 .495 .634 1939 .442 .587
    (-11%) (-8%)
  • Results shown in Table III show considerably improved properties of core loss after the diffusion anneal although the samples at no stage were subjected to a plastic deformation or stress. The improved properties demonstrate unequivocally that plastic deformation plays no role in domain refining by chemical striping in accordance with the present invention.
  • A metallographic examination of various samples in the diffusion-annealed zone showed no extensive attack of the substrate steel by the plated deposit which is consistent with the small amount of contaminant deposited and the relatively low diffusion temperatures used. Structures at high magnification tended to be varied and complicated as is not unusual in diffusion-couple metallurgy. The data suggest that the domain refinement of the present invention is not dependent on development and/or preservation of subtle composition gradients within the chemically striped or treated region. Rather, it appears that the effect is the Kirkendall porosity phenomenon which is well known in diffusion-couple metallurgy. Although there is no intent to be bound by theory, the Kirkendall related mechanism appears to suggest that contaminants of a different chemical nature can be successfully used as chemical stripe contaminants and that the precise chemical character is not as important as the diffusion rate with respect to the iron base material. Furthermore, in keeping with Kirkendall diffusion theory, it appears that lower diffusion temperatures would tend to exaggerate the Kirkendall porosity and that preferably the subsequent annealing should occur within the lower range of 1400 to 1700°F (760 to 927°C).
  • Example III
  • Single strips of a high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel of the steel described in Examples I and II were mechanically scribed or in some cases electrically discharge scribed in the as-scrubbed condition. The scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip. The lines were about 3 mm wide on single strip 8-mil (0.2 mm) Epstein samples and spaced at about 5 mm intervals The samples were then electrolytically plated with various metallic contaminants from the plating solutions listed in Table I. the plating resulted in the grooves in the base coating being at least half filled with the metallic contaminant, as judged under a microscope. After plating, the samples were diffusion annealed as indicated in a substantially hydrogen atmosphere. TABLE IV
    Sample No. Original Properties Chemically-Striped Metal Anneal
    Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss Time Temperature
    @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T @1.7T (hrs) (°F)
    (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp)
    B13 1875 .447 .658 1875 .433 .644 Sn 4 1475
    B15 1911 .448 .649 1910 .406 .590 Sn 4 1475
    B16 1899 .448 .641 1896 .410 .610 Sn 4 1475
    P1-10 1865 .473 .721 1885 .455 .644 Ni 1 1600
    P1-11 1858 .496 .766 1849 .476 .733 Ni 1 1600
    P1-12 1893 .494 .712 1829 .480 .650 Ni 3 1600
    D-3 1909 .434 .610 1902 .398 .593 Sb 6 1650
    D-4 1910 .471 .694 1911 .459 .670 Sb 6 1650
    D-5 1918 .455 .668 1911 .442 .653 Sb 6 1650
    D-6 1914 .424 .674 1911 .439 .631 Sb 6 1650
    K-2 1912 .441 .655 1911 .417 .627 Zn 3.5 1650
    K-3 1908 .416 .568 1907 .389 .564 Zn 3.5 1650
    K-12 1933 .418 .586 1924 .390 .551 Zn 3.5 1650
    K-16 1923 .432 .607 1923 .393 .584 Zn 3.5 1650
    J-18 1916 .394 .534 1914 .380 .519 Ni-Sn 3.5 1650
    K-5 1893 .400 .593 1892 .376 .546 Ni-Sn 3.5 1650
    K-14 1920 .414 .579 1921 .375 .520 Ni-Sn 3.5 1650
    L-7 1914 .423 .613 1914 .396 .546 Ni-Sn 3.5 1650
  • As the data show in Table IV, for the tin, nickel, and antimony contaminants provided by the plating solutions and conditions set forth in Table I, the steels exhibited improvement in core loss properties at both 1.5 and 1.7 Tesla with little or no loss in permeability. Since the samples were heated at temperature above typical 1425°F (774°C) stress relief annealing, the core loss improvements were permanent with respect to heating at that temperature. In other words, the improvements were "heat proof".
  • Example IV
  • Additional samples were tested to measure the thermal stability of the magnetic properties of samples treated in accordance with the present invention. If the magnetic property improvement is a result of Kirkendall porosity, then these improvements should exhibit exceptional stability. All of the samples are 8 or 12 strip Epstein packs. Each strip of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) steel of composition of Example I, was prepared by lightly mechanically scratching through the thin base glass to expose bare steel and was electroplated with the metals shown in Table V with lines about 0.25 mm wide and spaced at about 5 mm intervals. The strips were then stacked and then annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for 5 hours for diffusion. A considerable improvement in core loss properties was evident. The Epstein packs were then subjected to a further anneal at 2100°F (1150°C) for 2 hours or 10 hours as indicated. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to initial properties. TABLE V
    Sample No. Initial Properties Chemically-Striped with 1650°F/5 hr. Anneal After Further Anneal at 2100°F
    Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss
    @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T @1.7T
    (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp)
    Zinc Stripe
    160-6/3 1931 .420 .590 1930 .378 .519 **1912 .369 .508
    (-10%) (-12%) (-12%) (-14%)
    Nickel-Tin Stripe
    160-6/4 1916 .414 .588 1929 .369 .506 **1911 .370 .511
    (-11%) (-14%) (-11%) (-13%)
    Copper Stripe
    160-6/1 1920 .422 .577 1926 .369 .494 **1916 .381 .513
    (-13%) (-14%) (-10%) (-11%)
    W 1926 .435 .584 1918 .393 .530 *1977 .406 .547
    (-10%) (-9%) (-7%) (-6%)
    X 1926 .428 .572 1885 .395 .551 *1923 .414 .551
    (-9%) (-4%) (-3%) (-4%)
    Y 1908 .460 .629 1896 .413 .569 *1909 .425 .583
    (-10%) (-10%) (-8%) (-7%)
    Z 1921 .474 .626 1874 .410 .591 *1915 .417 .562
    (-14%) (-6% (-12%) (-10%)
    **Sample annealed 10 hrs. at 2100°F
    *Sample anneled 2 hrs. at 2100°F
  • The data and results of Table V show that the core loss improvement persisted up to 2100°F (1150°C) which demonstrates the unique and exceptional stability of the domain refining of the present invention. Furthermore, the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) chemical analysis by X-ray showed that the previously chemical striped areas were now of the same composition as the matrix steel. In other words, the high temperature had homogenized the strip and the contaminant was no longer localized but part of the overall residual impurity in the bulk of the sample. The homogeneity and low stress state of the soft magnetic material is a desired result.
  • In view of the discoveries of the present invention, it is believed that the metal contaminants chosen will perform as expected if the diffusion rates are slower than the self-diffusion rate of iron in the ferrous base alloy. Furthermore, the slower the rate of the diffusion through iron, the more suitable the metal may be as a contaminant to produce the permanent porosity. For example, copper is of the order of 4 times slower than iron in diffusion through iron. Nickel is of the order of 500 times slower. Such metallic elements having slower diffusion rates in iron should result in the Kirkendall porosity phenomenon and the benefits of the present invention.
  • Although the metallic contaminants can provide heat resistant domain refinement resulting from domain refinement of unstressed grain-oriented silicon-irons having a good base coating thereon, reproduceability was poor in those cases where the base coating was inadequate. It appears that the naturally-occurring forsterite base coating which results from the final texture annealing sometimes permits spurious plating of the metal contaminant through pores and cracks in the forsterite. Such was evident when nodules of antimony, for example, were found appearing and growing directly out of pores in the forsterite base coating in areas located away from the exposed underlying silicon steel and between the substantially parallel lines as shown in Figure 4.
  • It has been found that, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the use of an additional sealant coating or barrier coating applied to the forsterite before applying the metallic contaminant to the exposed silicon steel stripes results in a striking improvement in consistency and reproduceability to effect heat resistant domain refinement The main purpose of introducing the barrier coating in the process is to seal the pores and cracks in the forsterite coating. Table VI identifies several coatings which are believed to be useful in acting as a barrier coating in accordance with the present invention. The similarity between all of these coatings is that they are all water soluble and cure at relatively low temperatures. Furthermore, these barriers coatings contain phosphorus or silicates, or combinations or compounds thereof as the primary constituent of the coating. Preferably the coating primary constituent is a metal phosphate or metal silicate, and more preferably, the coating should be one that when cured sets up essentially as a magnesium phosphate layer. TABLE VI
    Designation Barrier Coating and Conditions Concentration
    SC Phosphoric Acid (85%) 202 gm/l
    Magnesium Oxide 22 gm/l
    Nalcoag (1050) 318 ml/l
    Chromic Trioxide 46 gm/l
    Water Balance
    Cured: 1000°F (538oC) - 1 min.(air)
    CS Sodium Silicate (40-42 Be) 500 ml/l
    Water Balance
    Cured: 800°F (427oC) - 1 min.(air)
    PS Phosphoric Acid (85%) 120 gm/l
    Magnesium Oxide 18 gm/l
    Kasil #1 22 gm/l
    Ammonium Hydroxide (58%) 21 ml/l
    Chromic Trioxide .34 gm/l
    Dupanol (2%) 1.0 ml/l
    Water Balance
    Cured: 800°F (427oC) - 1 min.(air)
    P Phosphoric Acid (85%) 118 gm/l
    Magnesium Oxide 18 gm/l
    Ammonium Hydroxide (58%) 20 ml/l
    Chromic Trioxide .34 gm/l
    Dupanol (2%) 1.0 ml/l
    Water Balance
    Cured: 800°F (427oC) -1min.(air)
  • In order to better understand the present embodiment the following further examples are presented.
  • Example V
  • Tests were performed to demonstrate the effect of the barrier coating on enhancing the heat resistant domain refinement process. All of the samples were obtained from various heats of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge silicon steel having the typical composition of Steel 1. Single strips of Steel 1 were mechanically scribed into the as-scribed condition. The scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel strip. The lines were about 0.25 mm wide and spaced at about 5 mm intervals. Each sample was then coated with barrier coating "P" from Table VI after the step of removing the base coating. All of the samples were thereafter electroplated with either zinc or copper from the plating solution listed in Table I. The magnetic properties are Epstein single strip results from strips of 30 x 3 cm. After electroplating, all of the samples were subjected to a diffusion annealing step at time and temperature set forth in Table VII. Percentages indicate change in core loss properties compared to original properties. The magnetic properties were determined in a conventional manner for single strip tests. TABLE VII
    Original Properties After 5 hr/1650°F Diffusion Anneal After 10 hr/1650 o F Diffusion Anneal
    Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss Permeability Core Loss
    @10H @1.5T @1.7T @10H @1.5T cf. @1.7T cf. @10H @1.5T cf. @1.7T cf.
    (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) Change (wpp) Change (wpp) Change (wpp) Change
    Contaminant
    G1 1935 .430 .585 Zinc 1940 .386 -10% .523 -11% 1940 .386 -10% .530 - 9%
    G5 1922 .420 .636 1908 .406 - 3% .592 - 7% 1946 .413 - 2% .607 - 5%
    L9 1907 .412 .604 1910 .358 -13% .512 -15% -- -- -- -- --
    G3 1922 .499 .677 Copper 1923 .430 -14% .579 -14% 1924 .463 - 7% .623 - 8%
    G7 1932 .525 .700 1934 .442 -16% .598 -14% 1938 .405 -23% .545 -22%
    F9 1952 .446 .628 1951 .417 - 7% .602 - 4% 1954 .396 -11% .573 - 9%
    K13 1904 .478 .666 1909 .421 -12% .598 -10% -- -- -- -- --
    J2 1938 .473 .625 1932 .391 -17% .536 -14% -- -- -- -- --
    Average Improvement (all strips) -12% -11% -11% -10%
  • When compared with the control samples which were magnetically tested as received before any treatment, Table VII presents data which shows that most of the samples had an attractive improvement in core loss averaging of the order of 10 to 12%. For comparison purposes, samples from the same batches of material were capable of providing 15-20% improvement in core losses by conventional mechanical scribing techniques. A further advantage of the present invention is that such improvement in core loss may be the result of heat resistant domain refinement.
  • Example VI
  • By way of further examples, additional tests were performed to demonstrate the domain refining process on different silicon steels having compositions of Steels 1, 2 and 3 for Epstein test packs. Each sample is prepared in a manner similar to that in the previous Example V, with required modifications to produce the different grain-oriented silicon steels at nominally 7-mil (0.18mm) or 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge, thereafter processed in accordance with the previous example under the experimental conditions described in Table VIII with parallel bands of treated regions about 5 mm apart. The magnetic properties were determined in a conventional manner for Epstein packs.
    Figure imgb0001
  • The data of Table VIII show that the domain refining process of the present invention can reduce the core loss in 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge material of Steel 1 by up to 11% when compared to initial properties. The best improvement was obtained with the contaminant copper. The core loss is 7-mil [0.18mm) 1 material of Steel 2 was reduced by about 5° at 1.5T and by 5% at 1.7T. The core loss in 7-mil (0.18mm) material of Steel 3 was reduced by about 7% at 1.5T and by about 4% at 1.7T.
  • Example VII
  • Further tests were performed to compare the results of domain refining with and without a barrier coating on silicon steel having the composition of Steel 1 for single strip Epsteins. Each sample was prepared in a manner similar to that in Example V. The strips were mechanically scratched to remove the thin base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines transverse to the rolling direction. For those samples so marked, the barrier coating "P" was applied after removing the lines of base coating. All the samples were thereafter electroplated with nickel or nickel-tin as indicated in Table IX from the appropriate plating solution of Table I and subjected to a diffusion anneal at time and temperature of 1 to 5 hours at 1600 to 1650°F (871 to 899°C) in hydrogen. The magnetic properties are Epstein single strip results of nominally 8-mil (0.2 mm) strip of 30 x 3 cm. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to original properties. TABLE IX
    Not Barrier Coated
    Nickel Chemical Stripe
    Sample # Original Properties Chemical Stripe + Diffusion Anneal
    Permeability Core Loss
    µ10H @1.5T @1.7T µ10H @1.5T @1.7T
    (wpp) (wpp) (wpp) (wpp)
    P1-10 1865 .473 .721 1885 .455 .644
    (-4) (-11)
    P1-11 1858 .496 .766 1849 .476 .733
    (-4) (-4)
    P1-12 1893 .494 .712 1879 .480 .650
    (-3) (-9)
    Average 1872 .488 .733 1871 .470 .676
    (-4%) (-8%)
    Nickel-Tin Chemical Stripe
    J-18 1916 .394 .534 1914 .380 .519
    (-4) (-3)
    K-5 1893 .400 .595 1892 .376 .546
    (-6) (-8)
    K-14 1920 .414 .579 1921 .375 .520
    (-9) (-10)
    L-7 1914 .423 .613 1914 .396 .546
    (-6) (-11)
    Average 1911 .408 .580 1910 .383 .533
    (-6%) (-8%)
    Barrier Coated
    Nickel Chemical Stripe
    N-41/5 1917 .470 .646 1867 .398 .555
    (-15) (-14)
    N-41/10 1918 .433 .594 1843 .379 .525
    (-12) (-12)
    N-41/4 1899 .469 .657 1844 .427 .620
    (-9) (-6)
    Average 1911 .457 .632 1851 .401 .567
    (-12%) (-10%)
    Nickel-Tin Chemical Stripe
    G2 1940 .419 .567 1932 .363 .502
    (-13) (-11)
    G6 1936 .489 .665 1936 .428 .574
    (-12) (-14)
    L4 1894 .443 .659 1896 .392 .561
    (-12) (-15)
    L9 1907 .412 .604 1910 .358 .512
    (-13) (-15)
    Average 1919 .441 .624 1919 .385 .537
    (-13%) (-14%)
  • The data of Table IX clearly shows the benefits of the present invention. For comparable samples, the barrier coated samples improved the consistency and reproductibility of the results. All the barrier coated samples had better core loss values than comparable samples which were not so coated. Furthermore, none of the barrier coated samples exhibited any nodules of metallic contaminant on the surface of the sample in areas located away from the exposed pattern line. This finding indicated that the barrier coating had blocked any pores or cracks in the base-glass coating which could have exposed bare metal which would have been plated with the contaminant.
  • In the course of such experiments, it was unexpectedly found that the barrier coating not only seals the pores and cracks in the base coating of the grain-oriented silicon steel, but it also acts synergistically with the major contaminant in the striped area of the steel during and after the diffusion anneal. Particularly, it is noted that with zinc or nickel-tin as the major contaminant, phosphorus was evident in the permanent defect produced in the steel.
  • Metallographic examination of various samples in the diffusion annealed zone showed no extensive attack of the substrate steel by the plated deposit which is consistent with the small amount of contaminant deposited and the relatively low diffusion temperatures employed. Structures at high magnification tended to be varied and complicated as is not usual in diffusion-couple metallurgy. Confirmation of interdiffusion between the steel and the contaminant as well as the steel, the contaminant, and phosphorus is shown in Figures 5 to 10. In Figure 5, a cross section at 375X through the Ni-Sn stripe after a two-hour diffusion anneal at 1650°F (899°C) shows nodules on the surface of the steel. Figure 6 shows the same nodule at 3000X. Figures 7, 8, 9 and 10 clearly display by scanning Electron Microscope X-­ray mapping the intrusion of nickel, tin phosphorus, and iron into the diffusion zone.
  • As was an object of the present invention, a method has been developed for providing heat resistant domain refinement for grain-oriented silicon steels to improve the core loss values. A further advantage of the method of the present invention is the ability to remove portions of the base coating to expose a pattern of the underlying silicon steel such as in lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction by any conventional or unconventional means provided that the steel exposed through the base coating is free from thermal and plastic stresses. The barrier coating enhances the core loss improvements and the reproduceability of such improvements. An advantage of the present invention is that a semifinished sheet product having a barrier coating and metallic contaminant can be produced for subsequent annealing by the customer before or after fabricating into transformer cores.

Claims (19)

1. A method for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet or strip having an insulation base coating thereon, characterized in the method comprising:
removing portions of the base coating to expose a line pattern of the underlying silicon steel;
applying a metallic contaminant to the exposed silicon steel, the metallic contaminant having a diffusion rate lower than iron in the silicon steel, the exposed steel being free of thermal and plastic stresses;
thereafter annealing the steel and contaminant thereon at time and temperature of 1400°F (760°C) or more in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled amounts of contaminant into the exposed steel to produce lines of permanent pores and so effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss of substantially stress-free steel.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the step of annealing the steel and contaminant thereon includes at time and temperatures up to 1800°F (982°C) to produce lines of permanent pores stable up to 2100°F (1149°C).
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the step of annealing the steel and contaminant thereon includes at time and temperature of from 1400 to 1700°F (760° to 927°C) to develop and stabilize the permanent pores.
4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the step of annealing the steel and contaminant thereon includes at time and temperatures up to 2100°F (1149°C) to further diffuse the contaminants into the steel to provide a substantially homogeneous steel sheet throughout the steel thickness.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the step of removing portions of the base coating is performed before applying the metallic contaminant.
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the metallic contaminant is applied at least in the areas of exposed steel.
7. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the metallic contaminant is copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof.
8. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the step of annealing uses a protective atmosphere of hydrogen or nitrogen or mixtures thereof.
9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising, prior to applying said metallic contaminant, applying to the base coated steel a barrier coating having a primary constituent of phosphorus or silicate, or combinations or compounds thereof, for sealing the base coatings.
10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the step of applying the barrier coating is performed followed by the step of removing portions of both the barrier and base coatings and thereafter followed by applying the metallic contaminant.
11. A method according to claim 9, wherein the step of removing portions of the base coating is performed before applying the barrier coating to the base coating and thereafter followed by applying the metallic contaminant to the exposed steel.
12. A method according to claim 9, 10 or 11, wherein the barrier coating is a metal-phosphate-based coating containing at least 25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus in the dried coating.
13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the barrier coating is a magnesia-based coating.
14. A method according to anyone of claims 9 to 13, wherein the step of annealing the steel uses a reducing atmosphere of substantially hydrogen.
15. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the pattern comprises generally parallel lines of exposed steel extending substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel.
16. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the base coating is forsterite.
17. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein prior to the annealing step and after applying the metallic contaminant, the silicon steel is fabricated into an article of manufacture.
18. A semi-finished sheet or strip product of final texture annealed grain-oriented silicon steel, the product comprising:
a forsterite base coating having portions thereof removed in a line pattern on the underlying silicon steel;
a metallic contaminant on the steel at least on the areas of exposed steel, the metallic contaminant being copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof;
the pattern of removed base coating being suitable to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss when the semi-finished sheet product is annealed in a reducing atmosphere to produce along the pattern in the steel lines of permanent pores to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss of a substantially stress-free steel sheet.
19. A semi-finished sheet product according to claim 18, comprising a barrier coating at least on the base coated areas, the barrier coating having a primary constituent of phosphorus or silicate, or combinations or compounds thereof.
EP89304300A 1988-06-10 1989-04-28 Method of refining magnetic domains of electrical steels Expired - Lifetime EP0345936B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US206051 1988-06-10
US07/206,051 US4904314A (en) 1988-06-10 1988-06-10 Method of refining magnetic domains of barrier-coated electrical steels using metallic contaminants
US07/205,711 US4904313A (en) 1988-06-10 1988-06-10 Method of producing stable magnetic domain refinement of electrical steels by metallic contaminants
US205711 1994-03-03

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0345936A1 true EP0345936A1 (en) 1989-12-13
EP0345936B1 EP0345936B1 (en) 1995-08-30

Family

ID=26900692

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89304300A Expired - Lifetime EP0345936B1 (en) 1988-06-10 1989-04-28 Method of refining magnetic domains of electrical steels

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0345936B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH02118023A (en)
BR (1) BR8902713A (en)
DE (1) DE68924000T2 (en)
MX (1) MX166083B (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0869190A1 (en) * 1997-03-26 1998-10-07 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Grain oriented electrical steel sheet having very low iron loss and production for same
GB2533446A (en) * 2014-07-18 2016-06-22 Gm Global Tech Operations Llc Metal sheet and method for its treatment
US10297384B2 (en) 2015-11-10 2019-05-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method for processing a plate workpiece
US10344349B2 (en) 2013-07-24 2019-07-09 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method for treating sheet metal

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3932235A (en) * 1973-07-24 1976-01-13 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Method of improving the core-loss characteristics of cube-on-edge oriented silicon-iron
US3990923A (en) * 1974-04-25 1976-11-09 Nippon Steel Corporation Method of producing grain oriented electromagnetic steel sheet
EP0193324A2 (en) * 1985-02-22 1986-09-03 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Extra-low iron loss grain oriented silicon steel sheets

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1182608B (en) * 1984-10-15 1987-10-05 Nippon Steel Corp ORIENTED GRAIN ELECTRIC STEEL SHEET WITH LOW POWER LOSS AND METHOD FOR ITS MANUFACTURE
JPS61133321A (en) * 1984-11-30 1986-06-20 Nippon Steel Corp Production of ultra-low iron loss grain oriented electrical steel sheet
JPS6319572A (en) * 1986-07-12 1988-01-27 Fujikura Ltd Magnetic sensor

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3932235A (en) * 1973-07-24 1976-01-13 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Method of improving the core-loss characteristics of cube-on-edge oriented silicon-iron
US3990923A (en) * 1974-04-25 1976-11-09 Nippon Steel Corporation Method of producing grain oriented electromagnetic steel sheet
EP0193324A2 (en) * 1985-02-22 1986-09-03 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Extra-low iron loss grain oriented silicon steel sheets

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0869190A1 (en) * 1997-03-26 1998-10-07 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Grain oriented electrical steel sheet having very low iron loss and production for same
US6103022A (en) * 1997-03-26 2000-08-15 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Grain oriented electrical steel sheet having very low iron loss and production process for same
US6364963B1 (en) 1997-03-26 2002-04-02 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Grain oriented electrical steel sheet having very low iron loss and production process for same
US10344349B2 (en) 2013-07-24 2019-07-09 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method for treating sheet metal
GB2533446A (en) * 2014-07-18 2016-06-22 Gm Global Tech Operations Llc Metal sheet and method for its treatment
US10309004B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2019-06-04 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Metal sheet and method for its treatment
US10297384B2 (en) 2015-11-10 2019-05-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method for processing a plate workpiece

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX166083B (en) 1992-12-17
JPH02118023A (en) 1990-05-02
DE68924000D1 (en) 1995-10-05
EP0345936B1 (en) 1995-08-30
DE68924000T2 (en) 1996-03-14
BR8902713A (en) 1990-01-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR970008162B1 (en) Ultra-fast heat treatment of grain oriented electrical steel
EP0331497A2 (en) Method for improving core loss properties of electrical sheet product
US2165027A (en) Process for producing magnetic sheet
US4915750A (en) Method for providing heat resistant domain refinement of electrical steels to reduce core loss
JP7350069B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and its manufacturing method
US4846939A (en) Method for producing a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet having an ultra low watt loss
KR0183408B1 (en) Ultra high magnetic flux density unidirectional electrical steel sheet and materials and manufacturing method
US4904313A (en) Method of producing stable magnetic domain refinement of electrical steels by metallic contaminants
EP0345936B1 (en) Method of refining magnetic domains of electrical steels
US4904314A (en) Method of refining magnetic domains of barrier-coated electrical steels using metallic contaminants
US3345219A (en) Method for producing magnetic sheets of silicon-iron alloys
EP0345937B1 (en) Method of refining magnetic domains of electrical steels
US4964922A (en) Method for domain refinement of oriented silicon steel by low pressure abrasion scribing
US4338144A (en) Method of producing silicon-iron sheet material with annealing atmospheres of nitrogen and hydrogen
CA1110142A (en) Method of producing silicon-iron sheet material with copper as a partial substitute for sulfur, and product
EP0389096A1 (en) Method of domain refinement of oriented silicon steel
US4174235A (en) Product and method of producing silicon-iron sheet material employing antimony
JPH0248615B2 (en)
JPS61284529A (en) Manufacture of grain oriented magnetic steel sheet having extremely low iron loss
JPS6253571B2 (en)
JP7606154B1 (en) Grain-oriented electrical steel sheet
JPH01309922A (en) Manufacturing method of unidirectional electrical steel sheet with low iron loss
JPH0143818B2 (en)
JPH0768581B2 (en) Method for producing grain oriented silicon steel with small amount of added boron
JPS6319573B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900525

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19930201

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68924000

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19951005

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19951130

ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19960318

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19960326

Year of fee payment: 8

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19970326

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980428

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19980428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050428