EP0192359B1 - Noise cancellation - Google Patents
Noise cancellation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0192359B1 EP0192359B1 EP86300563A EP86300563A EP0192359B1 EP 0192359 B1 EP0192359 B1 EP 0192359B1 EP 86300563 A EP86300563 A EP 86300563A EP 86300563 A EP86300563 A EP 86300563A EP 0192359 B1 EP0192359 B1 EP 0192359B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- noise
- signal
- timing
- value
- further characterised
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000003850 cellular structure Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002592 echocardiography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/02—Details
- H04B3/20—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other
- H04B3/23—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other using a replica of transmitted signal in the time domain, e.g. echo cancellers
- H04B3/232—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other using a replica of transmitted signal in the time domain, e.g. echo cancellers using phase shift, phase roll or frequency offset correction
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/02—Details
- H04B3/20—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other
- H04B3/23—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other using a replica of transmitted signal in the time domain, e.g. echo cancellers
- H04B3/238—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other using a replica of transmitted signal in the time domain, e.g. echo cancellers using initial training sequence
Definitions
- the present invention relates to noise cancellation and in particular echo cancellation for two-wire to four-wire conversion.
- Echo cancellers are known, for example as disclosed in United States Patent No. 4 074 086 of D. D. Falconer, for providing full duplex data transmission over analogue lines.
- the echo canceller consists of a transversal filter having a transversal delay with a plurality of taps providing sampling points with a specific delay for a source signal applied to the input of the delay line.
- the signal samples are each weighted by appropriate weighting coefficients to obtain what are commonly referred to as the tap contributions.
- the tap contributions are summed and said sum is subtracted from an input signal to remove noise present in the input signal which is correlated to the source signal.
- the tap contributions may be derived from a near end (source) signal and then subtracted from an input signal containing both a far end signal and echoes of the near end signal-noise.
- an adaptive up-date loop is provided for up-dating the weighting coefficients.
- adaptation requires a finite time and if the noise present in the input signal undergoes a timing variation, with respect to the cancellation signal, then unsatisfactory cancellation may occur.
- Such variations take place when the sampling phase of an output transmitter or an input receiver is adjusted to provide for example, more accurate sampling.
- the present invention therefore seeks to provide an improved apparatus for providing noise cancellation which mitigates the effect of timing variations.
- noise cancellation apparatus in a system for removing noise from an input signal, comprising a signal processor arranged to receive a noise source signal related to the noise present in the input signal, and to produce a cancellation signal; means for subtractively combining the cancellation signal and the input signal: characterised in that the processor includes means for compensating the cancellation signal in response to timing variations in said noise on receiving an indication that a timing variation has occurred.
- the apparatus of the present invention has the advantage of providing means within the signal processor which compensate for timing variations. This provides, amongst other things, improved precision, speed of operation and flexibility for correcting timing variations caused at different locations, and facilitates integration onto a single chip.
- the apparatus is further characterised in that the processor is a transversal digital filter wherein samples are stored as numerical values.
- the processor is a transversal digital filter wherein samples are stored as numerical values.
- Some or all of the taps may have more than one adapted value for generating a coefficient.
- some or all of the taps have a secondary adapted value which is added to or subtracted from a primary value on receiving an indication of a timing variation.
- Some or all the taps may have a plurality of secondary values which are combined to form the most significant terms of a Taylor approximation to the noise signal.
- timing variations are intentionally introduced to train the secondary values.
- timing variations are introduced continually, while the system is in operation, to adapt the secondary values.
- a noise source signal is sampled at the transmission rate, a plurality of consecutive samples are stored, each of the stored samples is multiplied by a coefficient stored as a respective primary value, the products of said multiplication are combined to provide a noise cancellation signal, and the noise present in the input signal undergoes timing variations: characterised in that a secondary value is stored for some or all of the coefficients, and the secondary value is arranged to be combined with or to replace the primary value when a timing variation occurs.
- coefficients are formed from more than one secondary coefficient when a timing variation occurs, and said secondary values form the most significant terms of a Taylor approximation to the noise signal.
- a full duplex modulator/ demodulator including an echo canceller for cancelling noise in an input signal due to transmission of an output signal, the echo canceller including a transversal digital filter having a plurality of coefficients, wherein said noise undergoes timing variations as the sample phase of the modem is adjusted: characterised in that the coefficients are formed by a first stored value, and some coefficients are formed by a second stored value when a timing variation occurs.
- the secondary values are added to or subtracted from the primary values when a timing variation occurs.
- FIG. 1 An embodiment of the invention is shown in Figure 1 as part of an echo cancellation device providing full duplex data transmission over telephone line.
- the invention has many other applications (for example in decision feed-back equalisation and other cancellation systems) where timing variations produce excessive noise.
- Near-end data is supplied to a terminal 10 and far-end data is received at terminal 11.
- the near-end data is converted to an analogue signal by a digital to analogue converter 12 and said analogue signal is supplied over a two-wire transmission line 14 via a hybrid 15.
- Input signals are received at the hybrid 15 from wire 14 and supplied to a sampling analogue to digital converter 16.
- a first divider 17 and a second divider 18 divide clock pulses generated by a clock 19 to supply timing pulses for the digital to analogue converter 12 and the analogue to digital converter 16. The value by which the clock pulses are divided is variable.
- the hybrid 15 cannot provide complete separation of the output signal from converter 12 and the input signal on line 14 thus a proportion of the output signal is supplied to converter 16. Furthermore the output signal is reflected and thus adds more noise to the input signal. Noise in the input signal due to the transmission of the output signal is cancelled by noise cancellation apparatus consisting of a sampled signal processor (a transversal digital filter) 19, which produces a cancellation signal, and a subtracting circuit 20 which subtractively combines the cancellation signal with the sampled input signal. The resulting digital input signal, with noise removed, provides an error signal to the processor whereby the characteristics of the processor are adapted as described below. The noise in the input signal is related to the data supplied to port 10 therefore this data provides a noise source signal to the processor 19.
- noise cancellation apparatus consisting of a sampled signal processor (a transversal digital filter) 19, which produces a cancellation signal, and a subtracting circuit 20 which subtractively combines the cancellation signal with the sampled input signal.
- the resulting digital input signal with noise removed, provides an error signal to the processor whereby the characteristics of
- the source signal is supplied to a delay line consisting of unit delays 21.
- the signal from port 10 and the signal from each subsequent delay provide a tap 22 to a respective circuit 23.
- Each circuit 23 has a respective primary coefficient storage means 24, and forms the product of the tap value and said primary coefficient during each sample period.
- the outputs from each of the processors 23 are summed by a summer 25 to provide a cancellation signal to subtractor 20.
- a secondary coefficient storage means 26 which compensate the cancellation signal when a timing variation occurs.
- the compensating coefficients may replace their respective first coefficients but preferably they are combined with their first coefficient.
- the structure shown in Figure 1 is a linear adaptive filter but the principle of storing secondary values which compensate for timing variations may be extended to non-linear structures.
- a preferred arrangement for the processor 19 is shown in Figure 3.
- Two unit delay devices 60 and a tap 61 are shown.
- a summer 62 receives a tap contribution on line 63 and other tap contributions on lines 63A.
- the output from the summer 62 provides the cancellation signal to the subtracting circuit 20.
- Each tap 61 supplies a circuit 64 which generates the tap contribution and is of a conventional type.
- a circuit 65 provides compensation for timing variations.
- the processor 19 has many taps but only a selected number have a compensation circuit 65.
- the circuits 64 and-65 will be described with reference to the elements shown in Figure 3 but it should be noted that these elements relate to the function of the circuits and not necessarily to their physical implementation which may take one of many known forms.
- the primary coefficient is stored by a unit delay 70 having a feed-back loop to a summer 71.
- a multiplier 72 forms the product of the tap value and the primary coefficient value to provide a tap contribution on line 63.
- the error signal is multiplied by a value less than unity and supplied to a port 73.
- a multiplier 74 multiplies the error signal by the tap value and the result is then combined with the primary coefficient value at summer 71 to provide an adapted primary coefficient.
- the secondary coefficient is stored by a unit delay 80 and a summer 81.
- An indication of a timing variation occuring to the digital to analogue converter 12 is supplied to a port 82, an indication of a timing variation occurring to the analogue to digital converter 16 is supplied to a port 83 and an indication of a timing variation occurring to converter 16 for training purposes (a training variation) is supplied to a port 84.
- the timing variation shown in Figure 2 is due to the sample phase of converter 16 being retarded by one increment-an indication of this variation is conveyed to port 83 as -1. Similarly the phase may be advanced by +1 or more +2, +3 etc.
- the secondary coefficient value is adapted each time it is brought into use and satisfactory operation is not achieved until it has been used several times. For this reason training variations are introduced to converter 54 either during an, initial training period (while the primary coefficient is training up) or preferably continually throughout the operation of the processor. Training variations do not cause the average sampling phase to shift.
- the secondary coefficient from delay device 80 is scaled by the indication from port 84 by a multiplier 85 and then added to the primary coefficient by a summer 86 and the (now compensated) primary coefficient is supplied to multiplier 72.
- the scaled error signal from multiplier 74 is scaled by the indication from port 84 by a multiplier 87, the output from which is supplied to summer 81 to adapt the secondary coefficient.
- the noise signal N shown in Figure 2 is a function of t such that:
- the processor of Figure 4 generates values of N for specific values of t but a timing variation shifts t by an amount delta t and the cancellation signal produced by the processor shown in Figure 3 is compensated by a linear approximation:
- a second order processor is shown in Figure 4 in which elements performing a similar function to those shown in Figure 3 are given the same reference number followed by a prime.
- a second order compensating coefficient is stored by means of a delay device 100 and a summer 101. The value of the second order coefficient is related to f"(t) at the sampling instants and is multiplied by delta t squared.
- indications of such variations are supplied to port 84' and the output from delay 100 is multiplied by the indication by a multiplier 102 and then added to the output from delay 80' by a summer 103.
- the output from summer 103 is then multiplied by the indication by multiplier 85'.
- the output from delay 100 has therefore been multiplied by the square of the indication.
- a similar procedure is performed for real variations but this is implemented by a multiplier 104 and an adder 105.
- the second compensating coefficient is adapted by taking the outut from multiplier 87 (which adapts the first compensating coefficient) scaling said output linearly by means of a scaling circuit 106, and multiplying the output from the scaling circuit 106 by the indication at port 84' by a multiplier 107.
- the indication value is therefore squared when used for updating the second compensating coefficient.
- the values (e.g. delta t and delta t squared) used for updating the adaptive elements should have mean values of zero, however, this is not possible for squared values.
- the output from multiplier 107 may be used to update a third coefficient.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Cable Transmission Systems, Equalization Of Radio And Reduction Of Echo (AREA)
- Soundproofing, Sound Blocking, And Sound Damping (AREA)
- Transplanting Machines (AREA)
- Inorganic Insulating Materials (AREA)
- Noise Elimination (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to noise cancellation and in particular echo cancellation for two-wire to four-wire conversion.
- Echo cancellers are known, for example as disclosed in United States Patent No. 4 074 086 of D. D. Falconer, for providing full duplex data transmission over analogue lines. The echo canceller consists of a transversal filter having a transversal delay with a plurality of taps providing sampling points with a specific delay for a source signal applied to the input of the delay line. The signal samples are each weighted by appropriate weighting coefficients to obtain what are commonly referred to as the tap contributions.
- In the case of noise cancellation the tap contributions are summed and said sum is subtracted from an input signal to remove noise present in the input signal which is correlated to the source signal. In echo cancellation, provided at the interface between four-wire transmission and two-wire transmission, the tap contributions may be derived from a near end (source) signal and then subtracted from an input signal containing both a far end signal and echoes of the near end signal-noise.
- In order to make the filter adaptive an adaptive up-date loop is provided for up-dating the weighting coefficients. However adaptation requires a finite time and if the noise present in the input signal undergoes a timing variation, with respect to the cancellation signal, then unsatisfactory cancellation may occur. Such variations take place when the sampling phase of an output transmitter or an input receiver is adjusted to provide for example, more accurate sampling.
- A known approach to mitigating the effect of timing variations is disclosed in a European Patent Application of O. A. Horna-publication No. 74 089. In Horna samples of the input signal are interpolated and then sampled again before cancellation so that intermediate values are available when a timing variation occurs.
- The present invention therefore seeks to provide an improved apparatus for providing noise cancellation which mitigates the effect of timing variations.
- According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided noise cancellation apparatus in a system for removing noise from an input signal, comprising a signal processor arranged to receive a noise source signal related to the noise present in the input signal, and to produce a cancellation signal; means for subtractively combining the cancellation signal and the input signal: characterised in that the processor includes means for compensating the cancellation signal in response to timing variations in said noise on receiving an indication that a timing variation has occurred.
- The apparatus of the present invention has the advantage of providing means within the signal processor which compensate for timing variations. This provides, amongst other things, improved precision, speed of operation and flexibility for correcting timing variations caused at different locations, and facilitates integration onto a single chip.
- Preferably the apparatus is further characterised in that the processor is a transversal digital filter wherein samples are stored as numerical values. Some or all of the taps may have more than one adapted value for generating a coefficient. Preferably some or all of the taps have a secondary adapted value which is added to or subtracted from a primary value on receiving an indication of a timing variation. Some or all the taps may have a plurality of secondary values which are combined to form the most significant terms of a Taylor approximation to the noise signal.
- In a preferred embodiment timing variations are intentionally introduced to train the secondary values. Preferably timing variations are introduced continually, while the system is in operation, to adapt the secondary values.
- According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a method of cancelling noise from an input signal by modelling a noise path, wherein a noise source signal is sampled at the transmission rate, a plurality of consecutive samples are stored, each of the stored samples is multiplied by a coefficient stored as a respective primary value, the products of said multiplication are combined to provide a noise cancellation signal, and the noise present in the input signal undergoes timing variations: characterised in that a secondary value is stored for some or all of the coefficients, and the secondary value is arranged to be combined with or to replace the primary value when a timing variation occurs.
- Preferably some of the coefficients are formed from more than one secondary coefficient when a timing variation occurs, and said secondary values form the most significant terms of a Taylor approximation to the noise signal.
- According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a full duplex modulator/ demodulator (modem) including an echo canceller for cancelling noise in an input signal due to transmission of an output signal, the echo canceller including a transversal digital filter having a plurality of coefficients, wherein said noise undergoes timing variations as the sample phase of the modem is adjusted: characterised in that the coefficients are formed by a first stored value, and some coefficients are formed by a second stored value when a timing variation occurs.
- Preferably the secondary values are added to or subtracted from the primary values when a timing variation occurs.
- The invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the drawings in which:
- Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a modem with an echo canceller;
- Figure 2 shows the noise response of the echo canceller of Figure 1;
- Figure 3 shows a preferred embodiment of the echo canceller of Figure 1; and
- Figure 4 shows a second preferred embodiment of the echo canceller of Figure 1.
- An embodiment of the invention is shown in Figure 1 as part of an echo cancellation device providing full duplex data transmission over telephone line. However it should be understood that the invention has many other applications (for example in decision feed-back equalisation and other cancellation systems) where timing variations produce excessive noise.
- Near-end data is supplied to a
terminal 10 and far-end data is received atterminal 11. The near-end data is converted to an analogue signal by a digital toanalogue converter 12 and said analogue signal is supplied over a two-wire transmission line 14 via ahybrid 15. Input signals are received at thehybrid 15 fromwire 14 and supplied to a sampling analogue todigital converter 16. Afirst divider 17 and asecond divider 18 divide clock pulses generated by aclock 19 to supply timing pulses for the digital toanalogue converter 12 and the analogue todigital converter 16. The value by which the clock pulses are divided is variable. - The
hybrid 15 cannot provide complete separation of the output signal fromconverter 12 and the input signal online 14 thus a proportion of the output signal is supplied to converter 16. Furthermore the output signal is reflected and thus adds more noise to the input signal. Noise in the input signal due to the transmission of the output signal is cancelled by noise cancellation apparatus consisting of a sampled signal processor (a transversal digital filter) 19, which produces a cancellation signal, and asubtracting circuit 20 which subtractively combines the cancellation signal with the sampled input signal. The resulting digital input signal, with noise removed, provides an error signal to the processor whereby the characteristics of the processor are adapted as described below. The noise in the input signal is related to the data supplied toport 10 therefore this data provides a noise source signal to theprocessor 19. - The effect of a timing variation at the analogue to
digital converter 16 is shown in Figure 2. An output pulse generated at time to produces an input noise response N which is sampled byconverter 16 at times t1, t2, t3 etc. whence its respective amplitude is N1, N2, N3 etc. Cancellation signals for N1 etc. are produced byprocessor 19 so that the noise is substantially cancelled. If the sampling phase ofconverter 16 is now shifted such that it samples at times t11, t12, t13 etc. the amplitude of the noise signal will be N11, N12, N13 etc., however, theprocessor 19 will still produce cancellation values of N1, N2, N3 etc. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the difference between N2 and N12 (delta N) is quite substantial resulting in unsatisfactory cancellation. - Referring back to Figure 1, the source signal is supplied to a delay line consisting of
unit delays 21. The signal fromport 10 and the signal from each subsequent delay provide atap 22 to arespective circuit 23. Eachcircuit 23 has a respective primary coefficient storage means 24, and forms the product of the tap value and said primary coefficient during each sample period. The outputs from each of theprocessors 23 are summed by asummer 25 to provide a cancellation signal tosubtractor 20. Associated with eachcircuit 23 is a secondary coefficient storage means 26 which compensate the cancellation signal when a timing variation occurs. In the embodiment of Figure 1 the compensating coefficients may replace their respective first coefficients but preferably they are combined with their first coefficient. - The structure shown in Figure 1 is a linear adaptive filter but the principle of storing secondary values which compensate for timing variations may be extended to non-linear structures.
- A preferred arrangement for the
processor 19 is shown in Figure 3. Twounit delay devices 60 and atap 61 are shown. Asummer 62 receives a tap contribution online 63 and other tap contributions onlines 63A. The output from thesummer 62 provides the cancellation signal to the subtractingcircuit 20. Eachtap 61 supplies acircuit 64 which generates the tap contribution and is of a conventional type. In addition acircuit 65 provides compensation for timing variations. Theprocessor 19 has many taps but only a selected number have acompensation circuit 65. - The
circuits 64 and-65 will be described with reference to the elements shown in Figure 3 but it should be noted that these elements relate to the function of the circuits and not necessarily to their physical implementation which may take one of many known forms. The primary coefficient is stored by aunit delay 70 having a feed-back loop to a summer 71. Amultiplier 72 forms the product of the tap value and the primary coefficient value to provide a tap contribution online 63. The error signal is multiplied by a value less than unity and supplied to aport 73. Amultiplier 74 multiplies the error signal by the tap value and the result is then combined with the primary coefficient value at summer 71 to provide an adapted primary coefficient. - The secondary coefficient is stored by a
unit delay 80 and asummer 81. An indication of a timing variation occuring to the digital toanalogue converter 12 is supplied to aport 82, an indication of a timing variation occurring to the analogue todigital converter 16 is supplied to aport 83 and an indication of a timing variation occurring toconverter 16 for training purposes (a training variation) is supplied to aport 84. - The timing variation shown in Figure 2 is due to the sample phase of
converter 16 being retarded by one increment-an indication of this variation is conveyed to port 83 as -1. Similarly the phase may be advanced by +1 or more +2, +3 etc. The secondary coefficient value is adapted each time it is brought into use and satisfactory operation is not achieved until it has been used several times. For this reason training variations are introduced to converter 54 either during an, initial training period (while the primary coefficient is training up) or preferably continually throughout the operation of the processor. Training variations do not cause the average sampling phase to shift. - The secondary coefficient from
delay device 80 is scaled by the indication fromport 84 by amultiplier 85 and then added to the primary coefficient by asummer 86 and the (now compensated) primary coefficient is supplied tomultiplier 72. The scaled error signal frommultiplier 74 is scaled by the indication fromport 84 by amultiplier 87, the output from which is supplied tosummer 81 to adapt the secondary coefficient. - If the sample phase of
converter 16 is adjusted to improve the sampling position then an indication of such a variation is supplied to amultiplier 88 viaport 83. The indication then scales the value stored indelay 80 and supplies it to asummer 89. Thus when the secondary coefficient is used to compensate for real timing variations (implementing multiplier 88) the secondary coefficient is not itself adapted. Howeversummer 89 is within the feed back loop of the primary coefficient so that the primary coefficient is permanently compensated. - When a timing variation occurs to converter 51 the indication is supplied to
multiplier 88 via asummer 90 and adelay device 91.Tap 61 is subsequent ton delays 60 therefore delaydevice 91 is equivalent to n unit delays. An indication of a timing variation occuring at the digital toanalogue converter 12 must be delayed to prevent compensation of signals which have already been supplied to theline 14. -
-
-
- A second order processor is shown in Figure 4 in which elements performing a similar function to those shown in Figure 3 are given the same reference number followed by a prime. A second order compensating coefficient is stored by means of a
delay device 100 and asummer 101. The value of the second order coefficient is related to f"(t) at the sampling instants and is multiplied by delta t squared. - During training variations indications of such variations are supplied to port 84' and the output from
delay 100 is multiplied by the indication by amultiplier 102 and then added to the output from delay 80' by asummer 103. The output fromsummer 103 is then multiplied by the indication by multiplier 85'. The output fromdelay 100 has therefore been multiplied by the square of the indication. A similar procedure is performed for real variations but this is implemented by amultiplier 104 and anadder 105. - The second compensating coefficient is adapted by taking the outut from multiplier 87 (which adapts the first compensating coefficient) scaling said output linearly by means of a
scaling circuit 106, and multiplying the output from thescaling circuit 106 by the indication at port 84' by amultiplier 107. The indication value is therefore squared when used for updating the second compensating coefficient. - For simultaneous adaptation of all the coefficients the values (e.g. delta t and delta t squared) used for updating the adaptive elements should have mean values of zero, however, this is not possible for squared values.
- The output from
multiplier 107 may be used to update a third coefficient. - The design lends itself to a cellular structure allowing any number of coefficients, corresponding to higher order terms of the Taylor expansion (e.g. f"' etc), to be calculated-the circuitry for the third coefficient would be similar to that for the second. However it should be noted that only one odd coefficient and one even coefficient can be adapted simultaneously and independent adaptation periods must be allocated for each pair.
Claims (12)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT86300563T ATE41277T1 (en) | 1985-01-29 | 1986-01-28 | NOISE COMPENSATOR. |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB858502182A GB8502182D0 (en) | 1985-01-29 | 1985-01-29 | Noise cancellation |
GB8502182 | 1985-06-18 | ||
GB8515371 | 1985-06-18 | ||
GB858515371A GB8515371D0 (en) | 1985-01-29 | 1985-06-18 | Adaptive filters |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0192359A1 EP0192359A1 (en) | 1986-08-27 |
EP0192359B1 true EP0192359B1 (en) | 1989-03-08 |
Family
ID=26288727
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP86300563A Expired EP0192359B1 (en) | 1985-01-29 | 1986-01-28 | Noise cancellation |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5113389A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0192359B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH0758923B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE41277T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU589941B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1251269A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3662323D1 (en) |
IE (1) | IE57178B1 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ214905A (en) |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GR861513B (en) * | 1985-06-13 | 1986-10-13 | Siemens Ag | Double cable amplifier fourfold amplifire of a double cable and fourfold circuit with amplifier |
EP0280898A1 (en) * | 1987-02-18 | 1988-09-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Circuit for the suppression of echo signals |
DE3874997T2 (en) * | 1987-07-20 | 1993-03-25 | Nippon Electric Co | Echo compensator. |
JPS6424519A (en) * | 1987-07-20 | 1989-01-26 | Nec Corp | Echo signal removing device |
JPH01123533A (en) * | 1987-11-06 | 1989-05-16 | Nec Corp | Echo removing device |
JPS6424520A (en) * | 1987-07-20 | 1989-01-26 | Nec Corp | Echo signal removing device |
JPH0752859B2 (en) * | 1987-11-06 | 1995-06-05 | 日本電気株式会社 | Echo remover |
JP2810052B2 (en) | 1987-11-18 | 1998-10-15 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Transmission equipment |
ES2038887B1 (en) * | 1991-04-18 | 1995-05-01 | Aplicaciones Electronicas Quas | DIGITAL HYBRID FOR MULTI-CONFERENCE. |
JPH05122106A (en) * | 1991-05-22 | 1993-05-18 | Hitachi Ltd | Semiconductor integrated circuit device |
JP3013613B2 (en) * | 1992-06-29 | 2000-02-28 | ヤマハ株式会社 | Data transceiver |
US5598420A (en) * | 1993-10-08 | 1997-01-28 | Abb Power T&D Company, Inc. | Apparatus and method for generating a power signal for a power system from signals genenrated by a communication device |
US5737433A (en) * | 1996-01-16 | 1998-04-07 | Gardner; William A. | Sound environment control apparatus |
JPH10135875A (en) * | 1996-10-28 | 1998-05-22 | Nec Corp | Echo canceller |
US5784361A (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 1998-07-21 | Coherent Communications Systems Corp. | Bi-directional asynchronous telecommunication audio signal processing |
US6278785B1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2001-08-21 | Acoustic Technologies, Inc. | Echo cancelling process with improved phase control |
NO319467B1 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2005-08-15 | Tandberg Telecom As | System and method for improved subjective stereo sound |
US9077363B2 (en) * | 2013-12-03 | 2015-07-07 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Stochastic encoding in analog to digital conversion |
US10770928B2 (en) * | 2017-06-06 | 2020-09-08 | Apple Inc. | Wireless charging device with multi-tone data receiver |
US10615648B2 (en) * | 2017-12-13 | 2020-04-07 | Apple Inc. | Wireless charging device with multi-tone data receiver and active power supply noise cancellation circuitry |
US10652663B1 (en) | 2019-04-30 | 2020-05-12 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Endpoint device using the precedence effect to improve echo cancellation performance |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1520148A (en) * | 1975-10-09 | 1978-08-02 | Standard Telephones Cables Ltd | Adaptive lattice filter |
US4064379A (en) * | 1976-06-11 | 1977-12-20 | Communications Satellite Corporation | Logarithmic echo canceller |
US4074086A (en) * | 1976-09-07 | 1978-02-14 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Joint adaptive echo canceller and equalizer for two-wire full-duplex data transmission |
US4072830A (en) * | 1976-10-04 | 1978-02-07 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Variable phase shifter for adaptive echo cancellers |
JPS5582551A (en) * | 1978-12-15 | 1980-06-21 | Nec Corp | Echo cancel unit for two line type duplex data communication modem |
NL7902053A (en) * | 1979-03-15 | 1980-09-17 | Philips Nv | ECHO COMPENSATOR FOR HOMOCHRONOUS DATA TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS. |
FR2479617A1 (en) * | 1980-03-26 | 1981-10-02 | Trt Telecom Radio Electr | ECHO CANCELLATOR FOR ECHO SIGNAL WITH VARIABLE PHASE |
JPS6046899B2 (en) * | 1980-09-26 | 1985-10-18 | 日本電気株式会社 | echo canceller |
NL8100650A (en) * | 1981-02-11 | 1982-09-01 | Philips Nv | DEVICE FOR CORRECTING PULSE DISTORTION IN HOMOCHRONOUS DATA TRANSMISSION. |
NL8102225A (en) * | 1981-05-07 | 1982-12-01 | Philips Nv | DEVICE FOR COMPENSATING ECO SIGNALS. |
FR2509552A1 (en) * | 1981-07-09 | 1983-01-14 | Telecommunications Sa | ECHO PHASE COMPENSATION DEVICE AND ITS APPLICATION TO ECHO CANCELLATIONS |
EP0073869B1 (en) * | 1981-09-08 | 1985-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data receiving apparatus with listener echo canceller |
US4411006A (en) * | 1981-09-09 | 1983-10-18 | Communication Satellite Corporation | Digital bit rate synchronizer for digital echo cancellers and similar signal processing devices |
FR2517905B1 (en) * | 1981-12-09 | 1985-11-29 | Telecommunications Sa | INITIALIZATION DEVICE FOR ECHO CANCELER AND ITS APPLICATION TO FAR ECHOES |
US4481622A (en) * | 1982-04-01 | 1984-11-06 | Anderson Jacobson, Inc. | High speed dial-up telephone circuit full duplex data transmission techniques |
FR2528643A1 (en) * | 1982-06-14 | 1983-12-16 | Trt Telecom Radio Electr | METHOD FOR REDUCING THE CONVERGENCE TIME OF AN ECHO CANCER AND DEVICE USED FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD |
FR2534754A1 (en) * | 1982-10-15 | 1984-04-20 | Trt Telecom Radio Electr | RECEIVER FOR A DATA TRANSMITTING MODEM HAVING AN ECHO CANCER AND AN EQUALIZER |
JPS59146231A (en) * | 1983-02-09 | 1984-08-22 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Echo canceller device |
DE3327467A1 (en) * | 1983-07-29 | 1985-02-14 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | METHOD AND CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR COMPENSATING ECHO SIGNALS |
FR2569322B1 (en) * | 1984-08-17 | 1986-12-05 | Trt Telecom Radio Electr | ECHO CANCELER USING DELTA MODULATION |
-
1986
- 1986-01-22 NZ NZ214905A patent/NZ214905A/en unknown
- 1986-01-23 AU AU52669/86A patent/AU589941B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1986-01-28 IE IE234/86A patent/IE57178B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1986-01-28 EP EP86300563A patent/EP0192359B1/en not_active Expired
- 1986-01-28 AT AT86300563T patent/ATE41277T1/en active
- 1986-01-28 DE DE8686300563T patent/DE3662323D1/en not_active Expired
- 1986-01-28 CA CA000500514A patent/CA1251269A/en not_active Expired
- 1986-01-29 JP JP61017681A patent/JPH0758923B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1991
- 1991-03-18 US US07/673,151 patent/US5113389A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NZ214905A (en) | 1988-09-29 |
AU5266986A (en) | 1986-08-07 |
CA1251269A (en) | 1989-03-14 |
JPS61256833A (en) | 1986-11-14 |
AU589941B2 (en) | 1989-10-26 |
ATE41277T1 (en) | 1989-03-15 |
US5113389A (en) | 1992-05-12 |
IE57178B1 (en) | 1992-05-20 |
EP0192359A1 (en) | 1986-08-27 |
JPH0758923B2 (en) | 1995-06-21 |
IE860234L (en) | 1986-07-29 |
DE3662323D1 (en) | 1989-04-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0192359B1 (en) | Noise cancellation | |
US4736414A (en) | Method of and device for the digital cancellation of the echo generated in connections with time-varying characteristics | |
EP0500096B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling coefficients of adaptive filter | |
US5737410A (en) | Method for determining the location of echo in an echo canceller | |
US4007341A (en) | Echo cancelling device | |
US4362909A (en) | Echo canceler with high-pass filter | |
US4751730A (en) | Process and system for improving echo cancellation within a transmission network | |
EP0021317B1 (en) | Adaptive filter with tap coefficient leakage | |
US3922505A (en) | Echo canceller | |
JPS6046899B2 (en) | echo canceller | |
US4334128A (en) | Echo canceler for homochronous data transmission systems | |
JPH0527287B2 (en) | ||
US4972467A (en) | Echo canceller | |
GB2075313A (en) | Echo cancellers | |
US4965823A (en) | Echo canceller | |
US4411006A (en) | Digital bit rate synchronizer for digital echo cancellers and similar signal processing devices | |
US4578543A (en) | Digital echo canceller | |
US6351457B1 (en) | Method of and apparatus for identifying unknown system | |
GB2102255A (en) | Two-wire line for digital communication | |
JP2949989B2 (en) | Echo cancellation device | |
JP2841952B2 (en) | Echo cancellation device | |
JP2556195B2 (en) | Echo canceller | |
JPS5860835A (en) | Echo canceling device | |
JPH05152999A (en) | Echo suppressing device | |
JPH0473649B2 (en) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19861024 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19880630 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 41277 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19890315 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3662323 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19890413 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
ITTA | It: last paid annual fee | ||
EPTA | Lu: last paid annual fee | ||
EAL | Se: european patent in force in sweden |
Ref document number: 86300563.3 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 19951214 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19951229 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 19960101 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19970128 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19970128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19970131 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS P.L.C. Effective date: 19970131 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20011218 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20011219 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20011219 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030129 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030131 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030801 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20030801 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20041209 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20041213 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20041214 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20060127 |