Unmanned aerial vehicle dynamics modeling method considering icing influence
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of unmanned aerial vehicles, in particular to an unmanned aerial vehicle dynamics modeling method considering icing influence.
Background
The icing of the unmanned aerial vehicle is an icing phenomenon caused on the unmanned aerial vehicle due to the influence of environmental conditions, wherein obvious moisture and proper environmental temperature or environment below zero are main key factors causing the icing phenomenon. When the ice accretion phenomenon occurs, the overall mass of the unmanned aerial vehicle is increased, the aerodynamic shape of the unmanned aerial vehicle, particularly the wing surface, is changed, the aerodynamic characteristics are further changed, the changes caused by the ice accretion are often unfavorable for the unmanned aerial vehicle, and the performance of the unmanned aerial vehicle system for performing all-weather flight tasks during long-term navigation is seriously affected. When the ice accretion happens, if the ice accretion happens, the flight performance of the unmanned aerial vehicle is deteriorated slightly to reduce the flight quality, and the crash accident of the unmanned aerial vehicle can happen seriously to cause serious loss.
The long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicle flies in all weather, the ice accumulation phenomenon is easy to occur, and the all weather flight performance of the unmanned aerial vehicle is seriously deteriorated due to the weather condition which must be overcome. The influence on the all-weather flight capability of the unmanned aerial vehicle after ice accretion is researched, and the improvement of the flight performance of the unmanned aerial vehicle in long voyage under the ice accretion condition have important and profound significance for the development of the unmanned aerial vehicle.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a flight dynamics modeling method considering icing influence, which characterizes icing severity by increment of a resistance coefficient, establishes an icing model according to the icing severity, calculates pneumatic parameters after icing, brings the parameters into a balance equation of an unmanned aerial vehicle, considers the pneumatic parameter change caused by icing on the basis of conventional unmanned aerial vehicle dynamics, and establishes a flight dynamics model of the unmanned aerial vehicle under the icing condition.
In order to realize the purpose, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
an unmanned aerial vehicle dynamics modeling method considering icing conditions comprises the following steps:
step 1, describing icing severity by increment of an icing resistance coefficient, and calculating to obtain a parameter representing the icing severity;
step 2, calculating influence parameters of icing on pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle by a computational fluid mechanics method;
step 3, calculating pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle after icing by combining parameters of icing severity and pneumatic parameters before icing;
and 4, substituting the aerodynamic parameters after icing into an initial balance equation of the unmanned aerial vehicle to obtain an unmanned aerial vehicle flight dynamics model influenced by icing.
Further, step 1 specifically comprises: describing the icing severity degree by the increment of the frozen resistance coefficient, and calculating to obtain a parameter eta representing the icing severity degree;
the increase in drag coefficient may be calculated by the following equation:
ΔCD=Z1Acβg(f)
in the formula, Z1Is a constant; a. thecIs the airfoil water droplet accumulation factor; beta is the water drop collection rate; f is the freezing coefficient.
Airfoil water droplet accumulation factor AcThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
wherein LWC represents the liquid water content of air; v is the flight speed of the unmanned aerial vehicle; t is the ice accumulation time; rhoiDensity of ice accretion; c is the chord length.
The icing severity parameter η is expressed as:
ΔCD(ac)the increment of the resistance coefficient calculated under the actual flight condition; delta CD(ref)Is the drag coefficient increment calculated by the NACA0012 airfoil.
Further, step 2 specifically comprises: calculating influence parameters of icing on pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle by a computational fluid mechanics method;
kCAfor the unmanned aerial vehicle icing factor constant, k is the aerodynamic derivative for different valuesCAThe difference is calculated by a computational fluid dynamics method.
Further, step 3 specifically comprises: according to the icing severity parameter and the icing influence parameter on the pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle, an icing model is established, and the pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle after icing are calculated:
the post-icing aerodynamic derivative can be calculated by the following formula:
C(A)iced=(1.0+ηkCA)C(A)
C(A)icedthe pneumatic parameters after icing; c(A)Is a pneumatic parameter before icing; k is a radical ofCAFor the unmanned aerial vehicle icing factor constant, k is the aerodynamic derivative for different valuesCADifferent.
Further, step 4 specifically includes: and (4) bringing the aerodynamic parameters after icing into an initial balance equation of the unmanned aerial vehicle to obtain an unmanned aerial vehicle flight dynamics model influenced by icing.
V and alpha, theta and q are respectively the incoming flow speed, the angle of attack, the pitch angle and the pitch angle rate of the unmanned aerial vehicle. F
x、F
z、M
YRepresenting the resultant moment of aerodynamic force, thrust force, and gravity.
The dynamic pressure of the unmanned aerial vehicle is S represents the reference area of the wing;
is a pneumatic chord length; t is
x、T
z、T
mThe components of the thrust in the x axis, the z axis and the pitching moment of the body coordinate system; c
x(A)iced、C
z(A)iced、C
m(A)icedRespectively, are the pneumatic parameters of the frozen unmanned aerial vehicle.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the advantages that:
the influence of icing on the pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle is considered, the flight performance condition of the unmanned aerial vehicle can be effectively obtained, and therefore a guiding idea is provided for relevant design, and all-weather flight capacity of the unmanned aerial vehicle is improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for modeling dynamics of an unmanned aerial vehicle according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a pitch angle response curve diagram after elevator step input under different icing degrees according to the embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a graph of the speed response of the coordinate system axis of the body after the step input of the elevator for different icing levels according to the embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings by way of examples.
As shown in fig. 1, a method for modeling dynamics of an unmanned aerial vehicle considering icing conditions includes the following steps:
step 1, describing icing severity by increment of an icing resistance coefficient, and calculating to obtain a parameter representing the icing severity;
step 2, calculating influence parameters of icing on pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle by a computational fluid mechanics method;
step 3, calculating pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle after icing by combining parameters of icing severity and pneumatic parameters before icing;
and 4, substituting the aerodynamic parameters after icing into an initial balance equation of the unmanned aerial vehicle to obtain an unmanned aerial vehicle flight dynamics model influenced by icing.
The step 1 specifically comprises the following steps: describing the icing severity degree by the increment of the frozen resistance coefficient, and calculating to obtain a parameter eta representing the icing severity degree;
the increase in drag coefficient may be calculated by the following equation:
ΔCD=Z1Acβg(f)
in the formula, Z1Is a constant; a. thecIs the airfoil water droplet accumulation factor; beta is the water drop collection rate; f is the freezing coefficient.
Airfoil water droplet accumulation factor AcThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
wherein LWC represents the liquid water content of air; v is the flight speed of the unmanned aerial vehicle; t is the ice accumulation time; rhoiDensity of ice accretion; c is the chord length.
The icing severity parameter η is expressed as:
ΔCD(ac)for drag coefficients calculated under actual flight conditionsIncrement; delta CD(ref)Is the drag coefficient increment calculated by the NACA0012 airfoil.
The step 2 specifically comprises the following steps: calculating influence parameters of icing on pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle by a computational fluid mechanics method;
kCAfor the unmanned aerial vehicle icing factor constant, k is the aerodynamic derivative for different valuesCAThe difference is calculated by a computational fluid dynamics method.
The step 3 specifically comprises the following steps: according to the icing severity parameter and the icing influence parameter on the pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle, an icing model is established, and the pneumatic parameters of the unmanned aerial vehicle after icing are calculated:
the post-icing aerodynamic derivative can be calculated by the following formula:
C(A)iced=(1.0+ηkCA)C(A)
C(A)icedthe pneumatic parameters after icing; c(A)Is a pneumatic parameter before icing; k is a radical ofCAFor the unmanned aerial vehicle icing factor constant, k is the aerodynamic derivative for different valuesCADifferent.
The step 4 specifically comprises the following steps: and (4) bringing the aerodynamic parameters after icing into an initial balance equation of the unmanned aerial vehicle to obtain an unmanned aerial vehicle flight dynamics model influenced by icing.
V and alpha, theta and q are respectively the incoming flow speed, the angle of attack, the pitch angle and the pitch angle rate of the unmanned aerial vehicle. F
x、F
z、M
YRepresenting the resultant moment of aerodynamic force, thrust force, and gravity.
The dynamic pressure of the unmanned aerial vehicle is S represents the reference area of the wing;
is a pneumatic chord length; t is
x、T
z、T
mThe components of the thrust in the x axis, the z axis and the pitching moment of the body coordinate system; c
x(A)iced、C
z(A)iced、C
m(A)icedRespectively, are the pneumatic parameters of the frozen unmanned aerial vehicle.
In the embodiment, the dynamic modeling is performed on the unmanned aerial vehicle under the condition that the influence of icing is considered for a certain unmanned aerial vehicle. Three icing severity conditions with icing severity parameter η of 0.214, η of 0.568 and η of 0.8 are adopted. And under a small disturbance linear model, considering unit step response of an elevator, and analyzing the influence of icing on the longitudinal flight performance of the airplane. Trim status under ice conditions, as shown in table 1. The ice accumulation of the airplane can obviously reduce the lift coefficient of the wings, so that the airplane can not realize normal horizontal flight movement, and if the airplane needs to realize equal-height flight, the incidence angle of the airplane needs to be increased by controlling the drift angle of the control surface of the elevator, and the lift is improved. The more severe the icing, the greater the impact on the aircraft. Fig. 2 and 3 show the response curves of pitch angle and speed along the axis of the body coordinate system after a step input of the elevator for different icing severity, respectively. The icing has a large influence on the control surface of the elevator, so that the control response is slowed down, the wing profile of the control surface is changed after the icing, the thickness is increased, and the adverse effect phenomenon can occur in severe cases.
TABLE 1 Balancing parameters
It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the examples described herein are intended to assist the reader in understanding the manner in which the invention is practiced, and it is to be understood that the scope of the invention is not limited to such specifically recited statements and examples. Those skilled in the art can make various other specific changes and combinations based on the teachings of the present invention without departing from the spirit of the invention, and these changes and combinations are within the scope of the invention.