[go: up one dir, main page]

CN112418600A - Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set - Google Patents

Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112418600A
CN112418600A CN202011102922.5A CN202011102922A CN112418600A CN 112418600 A CN112418600 A CN 112418600A CN 202011102922 A CN202011102922 A CN 202011102922A CN 112418600 A CN112418600 A CN 112418600A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
enterprise
indicator
result
dimension
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202011102922.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
周扬眉
张绪航
唐四强
吴磊
滕宇
余婷婷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chongqing Liyan Technology Co ltd
Chongqing Academy of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Chongqing Liyan Technology Co ltd
Chongqing Academy of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chongqing Liyan Technology Co ltd, Chongqing Academy of Science and Technology filed Critical Chongqing Liyan Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202011102922.5A priority Critical patent/CN112418600A/en
Publication of CN112418600A publication Critical patent/CN112418600A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0637Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides an enterprise policy scoring method and system based on an index set, which are characterized by comprising the following steps: s1, index matching of index items is carried out in one dimension according to the enterprise data; s2, after finishing the judgment of all index items of a scoring dimension, calculating the score of the current dimension according to a formula; repeating the steps S1 and S2 to obtain the score of each dimension; and then applying a formula to calculate to obtain the final total enterprise score. The enterprise is effectively evaluated in a quantitative manner, so that the efficiency and convenience of enterprise evaluation are greatly improved, and the enterprise is helped to improve the market competitiveness; meanwhile, the method can meet more complex matching requirements, and solves the problems that one condition needs to be judged according to a plurality of rules, nesting relation exists among the rules and the like.

Description

Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of enterprise evaluation, in particular to an enterprise policy scoring method and system.
Background
With the coming of global information age, the high and new technology industry has gained rapid development in China, and then the evaluation of high and new technology enterprises, especially the growth development guide of the high and new technology enterprises, is also becoming more and more the focus of the theoretical and practical circles.
At present, enterprise policy evaluation of high and new technology enterprises is limited to two modes of training meetings and off-line coaching of coaching institutions, evaluation and analysis modes are simple, service efficiency is low, and the enterprise growth and market competitiveness cannot be really helped.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide an enterprise policy scoring method based on an index set, which is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, index matching of index items is carried out in one dimension according to enterprise data;
s2, after all index items of one scoring dimension are judged, according to the following formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000011
Calculating a current dimension score;
s3, repeating the steps S1 and S2 to obtain the score of each dimension; then apply the formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000012
Obtaining a final enterprise total score;
step S1, index matching of index items is carried out in one dimension according to enterprise data; the method comprises the following steps of judging whether each index item is an index set, and if the index items are the index sets, executing the following steps:
a, independently calculating a judgment result of each rule according to a plurality of preset rules;
b, performing preset logic comparison operation on the judgment result of each rule to obtain an index set result;
the step a of separately calculating the judgment result of each rule according to the preset rules specifically comprises the following steps:
a.1, obtaining an index set N, wherein the index set N comprises the serial number of one or more index items and an index set N result judgment logical formula;
a.2, creating an index set N matching result set for storing matching results;
a.3, acquiring the value of the index from a pre-collected enterprise index library according to the serial number of the index item;
a.4, if the value of the index cannot be obtained from the enterprise index library, directly exiting the loop and not executing the subsequent steps;
a.5, comparing the values of the enterprise indexes which are pre-collected according to the matching rules defined by the current index items to obtain the result of meeting the index item conditions or not meeting the index item conditions, and storing the comparison result into an index set N matching result set;
and A.6, repeating the steps A.3 to A.5 until all index items in the index set are traversed, and outputting an index set N matching result set.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step B of performing a predetermined logic comparison operation on the determination result of each rule to obtain the result of the index set comprises the specific steps of:
b.1, taking out a corresponding comparison result from the index set N matching result set;
b.2, substituting the corresponding comparison result taken out into a preset logic comparison formula for operation to obtain a result of the index set N, wherein when the result of the index set N is true, the enterprise accords with the condition defined by the index set; when the result of the index set N is false, the enterprise is not in accordance with the condition defined by the index set.
Preferably, after the step S3 of deriving the final total score of the enterprise, the method further includes: and associating the index item of the result that the step A.5 does not satisfy the index item condition with the service provider.
Preferably, after the step of associating the index item of the result that the step a.5 does not satisfy the index item condition with the service provider, the method further comprises the step of pushing the associated service provider to the enterprise.
Preferably, at the step of: s1, before index matching of index items is carried out according to the enterprise data in one dimension, the method further comprises the following steps of: reading the source configuration of the index items of the enterprise data, calling all interfaces for acquiring the index items through reflection, taking the acquisition interfaces as grouping conditions, and completing the calling of all the acquisition interfaces to acquire all the index items.
Preferably, at the step of: s1, index matching of index items is carried out according to enterprise data in one dimension, and the method also comprises the following steps: and reading the policy based on an artificial intelligence mode, and generating indexes which need to be reached by the policy index items.
An enterprise policy scoring system based on an index set comprises the following modules:
the method comprises the following steps that 1, index matching of index items is carried out on one dimension according to enterprise data;
module 2, after finishing the judgment of all index items of a grading dimension, according to the following formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000031
Calculating a current dimension score;
the module 3, the module 1 and the module 2 are repeated to obtain the score of each dimensionality; then apply the formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000041
And obtaining the final total score of the enterprise and finally obtaining the enterprise score.
Advantageous effects
By the enterprise evaluation method, the enterprise can be scored according to enterprise data, the enterprise can be determined to accord with the declared policy, indexes which need to be reached by the policy which is not satisfied by the enterprise can be navigated, the enterprise can be effectively quantitatively evaluated, the efficiency and convenience of enterprise evaluation are greatly improved, and the enterprise can be helped to improve market competitiveness;
meanwhile, more complex matching requirements can be met, and the problems that one condition needs to be judged according to a plurality of rules, nesting relations exist among the rules and the like are solved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and other drawings can be obtained by those skilled in the art without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an enterprise policy scoring method based on an index set according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a result interface of an enterprise policy scoring method based on an index set according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of an index set according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
In this embodiment, an enterprise policy scoring method based on an index set is provided, and referring to fig. 1, the enterprise policy scoring method includes:
s1, index matching of index items is carried out in one dimension according to enterprise data;
s2, after all index items of one scoring dimension are judged, according to the following formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000051
Calculating a current dimension score;
n is the total number i of items following the summation symbol is the fourth.
S3, repeating the steps S1 and S2 to obtain the score of each dimension; then apply the formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000052
Obtaining a final enterprise total score;
n is the total number i of items following the summation symbol is the fourth.
In this embodiment, the index items include basic potential energy, innovation capability, enterprise credit, business conditions, enterprise growth, and the like; the basic potential energy comprises independent legal qualification, enterprise employee total number, establishment date and the like; the innovation capacity comprises the amount of intellectual property rights owned by enterprises, the conversion capacity of scientific and technological achievements and the like; the enterprise credit comprises tax credit, the situation of the administrative penalty in the last half year, the situation of the administrative penalty in the current year, the situation of serious violation in the last year, the situation of serious violation in the current year and the like; the operation conditions comprise average increase of business income of the main business in nearly two years, operation profit rate, abnormal operation condition in the last year, abnormal operation condition in the current year and the like; and for enterprise growth path planning, determining which index items are contained according to actual requirements.
In this embodiment, in step S1, index matching of the index items is performed according to the enterprise data in one dimension; the method comprises the following steps of judging whether each index item is an index set, and if the index items are the index sets, executing the following steps:
a, independently calculating a judgment result of each rule according to a plurality of preset rules;
b, performing preset logic comparison operation on the judgment result of each rule to obtain an index set result;
the step a of separately calculating the judgment result of each rule according to the preset rules specifically comprises the following steps:
a.1, obtaining an index set N, wherein the index set N comprises the serial number of one or more index items and an index set N result judgment logical formula;
a.2, creating an index set N matching result set for storing matching results;
a.3, acquiring the value of the index from a pre-collected enterprise index library according to the serial number of the index item;
a.4, if the value of the index cannot be obtained from the enterprise index library, directly exiting the loop and not executing the subsequent steps;
a.5, comparing the values of the enterprise indexes which are pre-collected according to the matching rules defined by the current index items to obtain the result of meeting the index item conditions or not meeting the index item conditions, and storing the comparison result into an index set N matching result set;
and A.6, repeating the steps A.3 to A.5 until all index items in the index set are traversed, and outputting an index set N matching result set.
In this embodiment, the specific step of performing the preset logical comparison operation on the determination result of each rule to obtain the index set result in step B is as follows:
b.1, taking out a corresponding comparison result from the index set N matching result set;
b.2, substituting the corresponding comparison result taken out into a preset logic comparison formula for operation to obtain a result of the index set N, wherein when the result of the index set N is true, the enterprise accords with the condition defined by the index set; when the result of the index set N is false, the enterprise is not in accordance with the condition defined by the index set.
The set of indicators is exemplified below:
one index set comprises a plurality of matching rules, and when a plurality of rules judge the result, the final result is dynamically calculated according to the logical comparison formula of the index set, so that the condition is judged according to the rules; the logical expression in the rule is to specify the AND or-NOT relation between a plurality of rules; the matching rules include a compare operator, a compare operation value, whether necessary, etc. The comparison operators comprise logic operators such as greater than, less than, equal to, unequal to, greater than or equal to, less than or equal to, including, not including, and intervals;
referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of an enterprise scoring result provided in this embodiment; in fig. 2, five dimensions of the enterprise scoring result are shown, respectively: basic potential energy, enterprise growth, operation condition, enterprise credit and innovation capability; it should be understood that the example of fig. 2 only shows five dimensions in one case, which does not limit the present embodiment, and other dimensions may also be used, and may be determined according to actual situations.
Referring to fig. 3, the business revenue of business of a whole, judge whether a condition of an enterprise is met, the index is concentrated to include business revenue of business of year number 2, number 3 business affiliated industry of business of year number, number 5 business of year number 5, the rule is to satisfy the following logical judgment formula (2 and 3) or (4 and 5) and show that meets the business revenue of business of; in fig. 3, the index rule may be configured, for example, the revenue of the last year main business is configured to be greater than or equal to 500 ten thousand;
for another example: the research and development cost sum accounts for the total amount of sales income in the same period, and the rule is that any one of the following is satisfied:
1. when the sales income of the last year is more than or equal to 5000 ten thousand, the research and development cost accounts for more than 5 percent;
2. the research and development cost accounts for more than 4% when the sales income of the last year is 2000-5000 ten thousand;
3. when the sales income in the last year is less than 2000 ten thousand, the research and development cost accounts for more than 3 percent.
In the embodiment, according to the bisection result, all the inconsistent enterprise index items in the judgment are listed for enterprise reference, and the enterprise is guided to improve the enterprise to meet the index conditions; obtaining a final enterprise total score at S3; then also comprises the following steps: and (C) associating the index item of the result of the step (A.5) which does not meet the index item condition with the service provider, establishing a model of the index and service system, and completing the recommendation of the service provider.
In the embodiment, S1, index matching of the index items is performed according to the enterprise data in one dimension; before, still include: and receiving the input enterprise name, judging whether the data of the enterprise is collected or not, and if so, taking the data of the enterprise stored in the local cache database as the acquired enterprise data under the condition that the data of the enterprise is effective.
In this embodiment, after determining whether the data of the enterprise has been collected, the method further includes: and under the condition that the data of the enterprise is not collected or the data of the enterprise is collected and is invalid, calling a relevant interface according to a collection method defined by the index to collect and store the enterprise data. That is, when an enterprise logs in for the first time, enterprise data needs to be collected; when the valid time of the enterprise data cached locally by the enterprise is expired, the enterprise data needs to be collected again. In a specific implementation, before the step 1 of acquiring the enterprise data, the following steps of acquiring the enterprise data are further included: reading the source configuration of the index items of the enterprise data, calling all interfaces for acquiring the index items through reflection, and automatically completing acquisition of all indexes by using all acquisition interfaces as grouping conditions instead of indexes for efficiency reasons.
In the present embodiment, at S1, index matching of index items is performed according to enterprise data in one dimension; in the past, the method also comprises the steps of reading the policy based on an artificial intelligence mode and generating indexes which need to be achieved by policy index items. The artificial intelligence mode comprises a deep neural network model, a convolution neural network model and the like. The policies are read in an artificial intelligence mode, the trouble of manual reading is saved, the efficiency is improved, and the intelligent operation is more intelligent. After the policies are read in an artificial intelligence mode, the policies can be checked by workers, and if places needing to be modified exist, the policies can be modified, so that the accuracy is further improved. The efficiency and the convenience of enterprise evaluation are greatly improved, the enterprise is helped to improve the market competitiveness, and meanwhile, the enterprise can clearly master the current condition of the enterprise, and a solid foundation is laid for subsequent development. Meanwhile, more complex matching requirements can be met, and the problems that one condition needs to be judged according to a plurality of rules, nesting relations exist among the rules and the like are solved.
The invention also provides an enterprise policy scoring system based on the index set, which comprises the following modules:
the method comprises the following steps that 1, index matching of index items is carried out on one dimension according to enterprise data;
module 2, after finishing the judgment of all index items of a grading dimension, according to the following formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000091
Calculating a current dimension score;
the module 3, the module 1 and the module 2 are repeated to obtain the score of each dimensionality; then apply the formula
Figure BDA0002726007600000092
And obtaining the final total score of the enterprise and finally obtaining the enterprise score.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these should also be considered as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (7)

1.一种基于指标集的企业政策评分方法,其特征在于,包括:1. An enterprise policy scoring method based on an indicator set, characterized in that, comprising: S1、在一个维度根据企业数据进行指标项的指标匹配;S1. Carry out index matching of index items according to enterprise data in one dimension; S2、在完成一个评分维度的所有指标项判断后,根据如下公式S2. After completing the judgment of all the index items of a scoring dimension, according to the following formula
Figure FDA0002726007590000011
Figure FDA0002726007590000011
计算出当前维度得分;Calculate the current dimension score; S3、重复步骤S1、S2得到每个维度的得分;然后套用公式S3. Repeat steps S1 and S2 to get the score of each dimension; then apply the formula
Figure FDA0002726007590000012
得出最终企业总分;
Figure FDA0002726007590000012
Obtain the final enterprise total score;
所诉步骤S1、在一个维度根据企业数据进行指标项的指标匹配;包括步骤判断每个指标项是否为指标集,若是指标集则执行以下步骤:The said step S1 is to perform index matching of index items according to enterprise data in one dimension; including the step of judging whether each index item is an index set, and if it is an index set, execute the following steps: 步骤A、根据预设的多条规则单独计算出每条规则的判断结果;Step A, calculate the judgment result of each rule independently according to a plurality of preset rules; 步骤B、将所述每条规则的判断结果进行预设的逻辑比较式运算得到指标集结果;Step B, carrying out a preset logical comparison operation on the judgment result of each rule to obtain an index set result; 所述步骤A、根据预设的多条规则单独计算出每条规则的判断结果的具体步骤为:Described step A, the concrete steps that calculate the judgment result of each rule independently according to preset multiple rules are: A.1获取一条指标集N,其中包括一个或多个指标项的编号,以及指标集N结果判断逻辑式;A.1 Obtain an indicator set N, which includes the number of one or more indicator items, and the result judgment logic formula of the indicator set N; A.2创建用于存放匹配结果的指标集N匹配结果集合;A.2 Create an index set N matching result set for storing matching results; A.3根据所述指标项的编号,从预采集的企业指标库中获取该项指标的值;A.3 Obtain the value of this indicator from the pre-collected enterprise indicator library according to the number of the indicator item; A.4若未能从所述企业指标库中获取该项指标的值,则直接退出循环不执行后续步骤;A.4 If the value of the indicator cannot be obtained from the enterprise indicator library, exit the loop directly without executing the subsequent steps; A.5根据当前指标项定义的匹配规则对预采集的企业指标的值进行对比,得出满足指标项条件还是不满足指标项条件的结果,并将该比较结果存储至指标集N匹配结果集合;A.5 Compare the values of the pre-collected enterprise indicators according to the matching rules defined by the current indicator item, and obtain the result that meets the condition of the indicator item or does not meet the condition of the indicator item, and stores the comparison result in the indicator set N matching result set ; A.6重复步骤A.3至A.5,直至指标集中所有的指标项全部遍历,并输出指标集N匹配结果集合。A.6 Repeat steps A.3 to A.5 until all index items in the index set are traversed, and the index set N matching result set is output.
2.根据权利要求1所述的一种基于指标集的企业政策评分方法,其特征在于,所述步骤B、将所述每条规则的判断结果进行预设的逻辑比较式运算得到指标集结果的具体步骤为:2. a kind of enterprise policy scoring method based on index set according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described step B, the judgment result of described each rule is carried out the logical comparison formula operation preset to obtain index set result The specific steps are: B.1从指标集N匹配结果集合中取出对应的比较结果;B.1 Take out the corresponding comparison result from the index set N matching result set; B.2将取出的对应比较结果带入预设的逻辑比较式运算得到指标集N的结果,其中当指标集N的结果为真时,代表该企业符合这项指标集定义的条件;当指标集N的结果为假时,代表该企业不符合这项指标集定义的条件。B.2 Bring the corresponding comparison result taken out into the preset logical comparison operation to obtain the result of the indicator set N. When the result of the indicator set N is true, it means that the enterprise meets the conditions defined by this indicator set; When the result of set N is false, it means that the enterprise does not meet the conditions defined by this indicator set. 3.根据权利要求1所述的一种基于指标集的企业政策评分方法,其特征在于,在所述S3得出最终企业总分之后,还包括:将步骤A.5不满足指标项条件的结果的指标项和服务提供商相关联。3. a kind of enterprise policy scoring method based on index set according to claim 1, is characterized in that, after described S3 obtains final enterprise total score, also comprises: step A.5 does not satisfy index item condition The resulting indicator items are associated with the service provider. 4.根据权利要求3所述的一种基于指标集的企业政策评分方法,其特征在于,在所述将步骤A.5不满足指标项条件的结果的指标项和服务提供商相关联之后,还包括步骤将所述的关联服务提供商推送给企业。4. A kind of enterprise policy scoring method based on index set according to claim 3, is characterized in that, after described associating the index item of the result that does not satisfy the index item condition in step A.5 with the service provider, Also includes the step of pushing the associated service provider to the enterprise. 5.根据权利要求1所述的一种基于指标集的企业政策评分方法,其特征在于,在所诉步骤:S1、在一个维度根据企业数据进行指标项的指标匹配之前,还包括以下采集企业数据的步骤:读取此企业的数据的指标项来源配置,通过反射调用所有用于采集各指标项的接口,以采集接口为分组条件,通过完成所有的采集接口调用以实现所有指标项的采集。5. A kind of enterprise policy scoring method based on index set according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, in the step: S1, before the index matching of index item is carried out according to enterprise data in one dimension, also comprises the following collection enterprise Data steps: Read the indicator item source configuration of the data of this enterprise, call all the interfaces used to collect each indicator item through reflection, take the collection interface as the grouping condition, and realize the collection of all indicator items by completing all the collection interface calls . 6.根据权利要求1所述的一种基于指标集的企业政策评分方法,其特征在于,在所诉步骤:S1、在一个维度根据企业数据进行指标项的指标匹配,之前还包括步骤:基于人工智能方式对政策进行解读,生成政策指标项需要达到的指标。6. a kind of enterprise policy scoring method based on index set according to claim 1, is characterized in that, in the step: S1, carry out index matching of index item according to enterprise data in one dimension, also comprises the step before: based on The artificial intelligence method interprets the policy and generates the indicators that the policy indicator items need to achieve. 7.一种基于指标集的企业政策评分系统,其特征在于,包括以下模块:7. An enterprise policy scoring system based on an indicator set, characterized in that it comprises the following modules: 模块1、在一个维度根据企业数据进行指标项的指标匹配;Module 1. In one dimension, perform index matching of index items according to enterprise data; 模块2、在完成一个评分维度的所有指标项判断后,根据如下公式Module 2. After completing the judgment of all the index items of a scoring dimension, according to the following formula
Figure FDA0002726007590000031
Figure FDA0002726007590000031
计算出当前维度得分;Calculate the current dimension score; 模块3、重复模块1、模块2得到每个维度的得分;然后套用公式Module 3, repeat Module 1, Module 2 to get the score for each dimension; then apply the formula
Figure FDA0002726007590000032
得出最终企业总分,最终得到企业评分。
Figure FDA0002726007590000032
The final enterprise total score is obtained, and finally the enterprise score is obtained.
CN202011102922.5A 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set Pending CN112418600A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011102922.5A CN112418600A (en) 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011102922.5A CN112418600A (en) 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112418600A true CN112418600A (en) 2021-02-26

Family

ID=74854626

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011102922.5A Pending CN112418600A (en) 2020-10-15 2020-10-15 Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112418600A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114723272A (en) * 2022-04-02 2022-07-08 重庆电信系统集成有限公司 Method and system of enterprise innovation capability evaluation based on artificial intelligence analysis
CN114971413A (en) * 2022-07-04 2022-08-30 东莞先知大数据有限公司 Scientific and technological policy pushing method

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104375998A (en) * 2013-08-13 2015-02-25 王建平 Intelligentized project matching analysis tool and implementation method thereof
CN105373602A (en) * 2015-11-09 2016-03-02 宁波市软件与服务外包产业园管理服务中心 Policy pushing management system
CN109242326A (en) * 2018-09-19 2019-01-18 江苏风云科技服务有限公司 A kind of policy shared system based on big data and artificial intelligence
CN109359818A (en) * 2018-09-20 2019-02-19 重庆誉存大数据科技有限公司 A kind of pair of enterprise carries out the method and six rib star models of risk quantification assessment
CN109872072A (en) * 2019-02-25 2019-06-11 政和科技股份有限公司 A kind of science and technology item automatic duplicate checking method and system
CN110020048A (en) * 2017-10-27 2019-07-16 北京宸信征信有限公司 A kind of business risk evaluation system and method based on open source data
CN110222129A (en) * 2019-06-17 2019-09-10 山东浪潮商用系统有限公司 A kind of credit appraisal algorithm based on relevant database
CN111159630A (en) * 2019-12-31 2020-05-15 科技谷(厦门)信息技术有限公司 Park policy matching and evaluating method based on multi-standard decision model
CN111309759A (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-06-19 重庆强大锐智科技服务有限公司 Enterprise scientific and technological project intelligent matching platform
CN111652524A (en) * 2020-06-11 2020-09-11 中力数创(重庆)科技有限公司 Method and device for intelligently matching policy and guiding improvement path

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104375998A (en) * 2013-08-13 2015-02-25 王建平 Intelligentized project matching analysis tool and implementation method thereof
CN105373602A (en) * 2015-11-09 2016-03-02 宁波市软件与服务外包产业园管理服务中心 Policy pushing management system
CN110020048A (en) * 2017-10-27 2019-07-16 北京宸信征信有限公司 A kind of business risk evaluation system and method based on open source data
CN109242326A (en) * 2018-09-19 2019-01-18 江苏风云科技服务有限公司 A kind of policy shared system based on big data and artificial intelligence
CN109359818A (en) * 2018-09-20 2019-02-19 重庆誉存大数据科技有限公司 A kind of pair of enterprise carries out the method and six rib star models of risk quantification assessment
CN109872072A (en) * 2019-02-25 2019-06-11 政和科技股份有限公司 A kind of science and technology item automatic duplicate checking method and system
CN110222129A (en) * 2019-06-17 2019-09-10 山东浪潮商用系统有限公司 A kind of credit appraisal algorithm based on relevant database
CN111159630A (en) * 2019-12-31 2020-05-15 科技谷(厦门)信息技术有限公司 Park policy matching and evaluating method based on multi-standard decision model
CN111309759A (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-06-19 重庆强大锐智科技服务有限公司 Enterprise scientific and technological project intelligent matching platform
CN111652524A (en) * 2020-06-11 2020-09-11 中力数创(重庆)科技有限公司 Method and device for intelligently matching policy and guiding improvement path

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114723272A (en) * 2022-04-02 2022-07-08 重庆电信系统集成有限公司 Method and system of enterprise innovation capability evaluation based on artificial intelligence analysis
CN114971413A (en) * 2022-07-04 2022-08-30 东莞先知大数据有限公司 Scientific and technological policy pushing method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103426070B (en) Compilation method and device of group combined financial statement
CN110751361B (en) Bank demand entry level management method and system
CN114202239A (en) Engineering cost risk early warning system
CN110544035A (en) internal control detection method, system and computer readable storage medium
CN119149623A (en) Data development method and platform based on multi-source data integration
CN119938943A (en) Method and device for auditing based on large language model
CN119205377A (en) A multi-terminal ecological fund allocation management system for e-commerce enterprises
CN112418600A (en) Enterprise policy scoring method and system based on index set
CN111506876A (en) Data prediction analysis method, system, equipment and readable storage medium
CN114240333A (en) Holographic application center system for electronic accounting archives
CN117273511A (en) Data analysis method and device
CN120256507B (en) A method for automatic process processing of accounting data
CN119444402A (en) Enterprise credit evaluation system and method
Li et al. Financial automatic management system based on artificial intelligence technology
CN112418599B (en) A method and system for enterprise growth path planning based on index set
CN112418601A (en) Policy matching method and system based on index set
Grzeszczak Intelligent Support of Accounting IT Systems in Modern Enterprises
González et al. BPI Challenge: Process Mining Analysis for Business Travel Reimbursement
CN117764536B (en) An innovation and entrepreneurship project auxiliary management system based on artificial intelligence
CN121504161A (en) AI-based enterprise cost control methods, systems, and electronic devices
Silaen Design and Build a Web-Based Accounting Information System to Optimize Financial Management
CN117726468A (en) Financial tax management method, system and application of AI financial tax robot
CN119579124A (en) Personal salary intelligent analysis method, device, computer equipment and readable storage medium based on big data analysis
Groh A mathematic and scientific approach to 21st century in-house litigation
Cristiana et al. The Digitalizationof Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Opportunities and Challenges

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20210226

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication