Detailed description of the preferred embodiments
The experimental procedures used in the following examples are all conventional procedures unless otherwise specified. Materials, reagents and the like used in the following examples are commercially available unless otherwise specified. The water used in the following examples was ultrapure water, which was treated with a Milli-Q ultrapure water purification system. All samples in the following examples were not purified prior to use.
The invention is carried out according to the following specific steps:
homogeneous immunoreaction:
preparation of a.30 nm AuNPs
a1 adding 1 mL of 1% chloroauric acid (w/v) into 90 mL of ultrapure water, placing magnetons into a three-necked bottle, mixing uniformly, heating in a water bath under reflux for 5 min,
a2 adding 1.7 mL of 1% sodium citrate reducer, stirring and maintaining reflux for 20 min,
a3, closing the water bath, keeping the stirring of the stirrer, slowly cooling the solution to room temperature, pouring the solution into a 100 mL storage bottle, and fixing the volume to 100 mL;
antibody modification of 30 nm AuNPs
b1 adding 100 μ L of pH 9.0 boric acid buffer solution into 1 mL of AuNPs, adjusting pH to about 8.0-8.4 to make IgG protein near isoelectric point (no self-charge), mixing by vortex,
b2 adding 30 μ g CEA antibody, mixing by vortex, reacting at room temperature (25 deg.C) for 30 min,
b3 adding blocking agent 10% BSA solution 150 uL, blocking at room temperature (25 deg.C) for 30 min,
b4 solution after reaction at 4oCentrifuging at 8000-;
c. immune response
c1 adding 100 μ L10 times diluted AuNPs-CEA antibody biological probe into 500 μ L centrifuge tube, then adding 30 μ L serum sample, finally adding 100 μ L10 times diluted AuNPs-CEA antibody biological probe,
after the c2 solution was vortexed uniformly, it was vortexed at 37oC, incubating for 60 min;
d. sample dilution
d1 sucking 20 μ L of reacted solution, adding into 2 mL centrifuge tube, adding 2 mL ultrapure water, mixing by vortex,
d2 adding 40 μ L of the diluted solution into a 4 mL centrifuge tube, adding 4 mL of ultrapure water, and mixing by vortex;
SP-ICPMS frequency mode determination
e1 the pipette of the ICPMS was inserted into the diluted solution,
e2 setting frequency mode to collect signal of solution at speed of 50 μ s/time for 60 s;
SP-ICPMS Strength Pattern determination
f1 the pipette of the ICPMS was inserted into the diluted solution,
f2 setting an intensity mode to collect signals of the solution, wherein the collection time is 60 s, and the speed is 50 mus/time;
the following description will be further described with reference to the drawings attached to the specification, but the analysis method of the present invention is not limited to the following examples.
Example 1 investigation of whether analyte-induced aggregation of AuNPs probes would lead to a change in SP-ICPMS Signal
To investigate whether the aggregation of AuNPs probe induced by CEA can cause signal change in SP-ICPMS, based on the antigen-antibody reaction of CEA, the real-time signal change of the reaction sample in SP-ICPMS in the presence of different concentrations of CEA by AuNPs probe was investigated. In the experiment, CEA with different concentrations is added into AuNPs probe solution, and the solution after reaction is analyzed by SP-ICPMS through dilution. As can be seen in FIG. 1, the real-time signal appears to be of relatively low intensity and relatively stable and uniform signal in the absence of the CEA sample. With the increasing CEA concentration, the real-time signal has the tendency of increasing intensity, and the number of the signals also has the tendency of decreasing with the aggregation of the AuNPs probe. In the presence of CEA at a concentration of 100 ng/mL, a significant increase in real-time signal and a reduced amount of signal was observed. Therefore, the embodiment fully proves that the antigen-antibody recognition system established by the method can cause the change of SP-ICPMS signals in the presence of CEA, and the two-parameter quantitative detection of CEA can be realized by using the valuable signal changes.
Example 2 feasibility study of two modes in the assay method of the invention
Because the analysis method adopts a double-parameter self-verification mechanism, before the analysis method is applied to homogeneous immunoassay, feasibility analysis needs to be carried out on two modes;
a. feasibility study on frequency mode: in the frequency mode, the frequency information analyzed by the instrument can reflect the number of the AuNPs probe aggregates in the sample. And (3) continuously diluting the newly-prepared AuNPs probe by a certain multiple to obtain probe solutions with a series of concentrations. After dilution by a certain factor, AuNPs probe solutions of different concentrations were analyzed in a frequency mode SP-ICPMS with a scanning time of 60 s and a speed of 50. mu.s/time. The results are shown in FIG. 2, where the concentrations of AuNPs probes were from 0 to 5.11X 105The number of the corresponding SP-ICPMS frequencies is increased correspondingly per mL, and the change is in a linear relation with the change of the concentration of the changed AuNPs, and the correlation coefficient is 0.9991. Therefore, under the condition of CEA, the AuNPs probe can agglomerate to different degrees, and the CEA concentration can be researched through the change of the number of the AuNPs probe agglomerates before and after the reaction;
b. investigation of the feasibility of the intensity pattern: in the intensity mode, the intensity information analyzed by the instrument can reflect the size of the AuNPs probe aggregate in the sample. A series of AuNPs sample solutions with different particle sizes are prepared to simulate AuNPs probe aggregates with different particle sizes, wherein the particle sizes of the AuNPs probe aggregates are 21 nm, 30 nm, 34 nm, 43 nm and 78 nm respectively. After dilution by a certain factor, the concentrations of AuNPs sample solutions of the respective particle sizes were kept equivalent. AuNPs probe solutions of different particle sizes were analyzed in the intensity mode SP-ICPMS with a scan time of 60 s and a speed of 50. mu.s/time. As shown in FIG. 2, the corresponding SP-ICPMS signal intensity increases with the increasing particle size of the AuNPs solution, and the change of the intensity is logarithmically linear with the changed particle size of the AuNPs, and the correlation coefficient is 0.9999. Therefore, the AuNPs probe can agglomerate in different degrees under the condition of CEA, and the CEA concentration can be researched through the change of the particle size of the AuNPs probe agglomerate before and after the reaction.
Example 3 investigation of the linearity of detection of CEA by the assay of the invention
The homogeneous immunoassay of CEA based on SP-ICPMS is explored in the embodiment, and the linearity of two modes in the established two-parameter self-verification mechanism is respectively explored;
a. linearity of frequency pattern versus CEA detection: in the frequency mode, after the sample solution after the reaction is diluted 10000 times, in the SP-ICPMS, the time resolution signal collection is carried out by the frequency mode, the collection time is 60 s, and the collection speed is 50 mus/time. As shown in FIG. 3, a linear relationship of 0.78-100 ng/mL was obtained according to the proportional relationship between the CEA concentration and the frequency response signal, and the linear correlation coefficient was 0.9991. Calculating the detection limit of 0.21 ng/mL by linear regression analysis;
b. linearity of intensity pattern versus CEA detection: in the intensity mode, after the reaction-completed sample solution was diluted 10000 times, time-resolved signal acquisition was performed in the intensity mode at an acquisition time of 60 s and an acquisition rate of 50. mu.s/time in SP-ICPMS. As shown in FIG. 3, a linear relationship of 1.25-100 ng/mL was obtained according to the proportional relationship between the CEA concentration and the intensity response signal, and the linear correlation coefficient was 0.9993. For linear regression analysis, a detection limit of 0.68 ng/mL was calculated.
Example 4 investigation of CEA Selectivity of the assay of the invention, correlation of the two modes
a. Selectivity of the method of the invention to CEA: the method adopts 100 ng/mL as the concentration of CEA sample in the interference experiment, and the adopted interference antigen and the concentration are respectively 1 mug/mL of Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP), 1 mug/mL of human immunoglobulin G (IgG) and 500U/mL of carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA 199). The method also explores the influence of certain salinity conditions on a reaction system, and explores by taking a 10 mg/mL NaCl solution as salinity. According to the experimental steps, CEA and an interfering substance are mixed in sequence, and after complete reaction with an AuNPs probe, a sample is diluted by 10000 times, and the sample is analyzed in a strength mode under SP-ICPMS. The result is shown in fig. 4, except that CEA causes AuNPs probe specific recognition and aggregation, resulting in obvious intensity information change, the rest interfering substances are equivalent to blank signals, and the specificity of the established homogeneous immunization method to CEA and the tolerance to salinity are considerable;
b. the correlation between the two modes in the method of the invention: the method adopts a frequency mode and an intensity mode to detect the CEA concentration in the human serum sample, and the obtained results are calculated according to the linearity obtained by the two modes respectively to obtain the CEA concentration value. Finally, the concentration values obtained from the two modes are compared with each other. As shown in FIG. 4, the CEA concentration in the serum was in the range of 0 to 80 ng/mL, the CEA concentration measured in the frequency mode and the CEA concentration measured in the intensity mode were well matched to each other, and the correlation coefficient between the two modes was 0.9875.
Example 5 investigation of the assay method of the invention detection and spiking recovery of CEA in actual blood samples
a. Collecting serum: the serum adopted in the application of the analysis method is from the seven hospitals in metropolis;
b. blood sample detection: the sample volume of each serum sample was 30 uL, and the CEA content in each serum was determined by ELISA kit (purchased from Shanghai Touchi Biotech Co., Ltd.) before the assay method of the present invention was used. The analytical procedure for the detection was in accordance with the above. The results are shown in FIG. 4, the CEA content measured by SP-ICPMS is in good agreement with the value obtained by ELISA in the CEA detection linear range of the method of the invention, and the correlation coefficient of the two methods is 0.9948;
c. adding a standard and recovering: group 12 serum samples were divided into 2 groups, wherein one group of 6 serum samples were mixed with an equal volume (100. mu.L) of 100 ng/mL CEA standard, and the other group of 6 serum samples were mixed with an equal volume (100. mu.L) of 50 ng/mL CEA standard. The resulting sample solution was investigated according to the above-mentioned research procedure and tested with SP-ICPMS. The results are shown in fig. 5, the established method can obtain the recovery rate of 93-116%, and the analysis method of the invention is proved to have the analysis and detection capability of actual samples.