Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
A first aspect of the present invention provides a method for preparing a Pt-based perovskite-type catalyst, comprising the steps of:
s1 dispersing Pt source and soluble salt containing A, B elements in water, adding complexing agent, mixing and stirring, drying and roasting at high temperature to obtain ABxPt(1-x)O3A perovskite; the element A is at least one of lanthanum (La), praseodymium (Pr) and cerium (Ce), and the soluble salt used by the element A is nitrate, chloride or acetate containing at least one of lanthanum, praseodymium and cerium; the element B is at least one of cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn) and aluminum (Al), and further soluble salt used by the element B is nitrate, chloride or acetate containing at least one of cobalt, manganese and aluminum; the Pt source is at least one of chloroplatinic acid and ammonium chloroplatinate; x is the molar ratio of the B element to the (B + Pt) element, and the range of x is 0.7-0.95, and preferably 0.8; the complexing agent is citric acid. The ratio of the total molar amount of the Pt source and soluble salt containing A, B element to the molar amount of the complexing agent is 1 (0.6-1.2), and preferably 1: 1; furthermore, the dosage ratio of the soluble salt used by the element A to water is (0.3-0.4) mol: 1L. The mixing and stirring time is 30-60 min; the drying temperature is 90-120 ℃, and the drying time is 15-30 h; in the process, a perovskite structure is formed through high-temperature roasting, the high-temperature roasting temperature is 650-1300 ℃, along with the increase of the roasting temperature, the surface Pt content rapidly rises firstly, then slowly falls, the specific surface area gradually falls, and the fact that the higher roasting temperature is beneficial to improving the surface Pt content is shown, but the higher roasting temperature can cause the specific surface to be active on the contraryLow, but not beneficial to the promotion of catalytic activity; preferably 850-1100 ℃, and further 1000 ℃, wherein the range can simultaneously give consideration to higher surface Pt content and higher specific surface area; the high-temperature roasting time is 3-5 h, preferably 4 h.
S2 mixing the above ABxPt(1-x)O3Carrying out acid treatment and reduction on the perovskite to obtain a Pt-based perovskite catalyst; wherein, the acid selected in the acid treatment process is hydrochloric acid or nitric acid, the molar concentration is 3-6 mol/L, and ABxPt(1-x)O3The solid-to-liquid ratio of perovskite to acid is 1 g: (5-10) ml, preferably 1 g: 8ml of the solution; the acid treatment time is 15-120 min, the surface Pt content also shows a trend of rising firstly and then falling along with the increase of the acid treatment time, meanwhile, the acid treatment time can slightly improve a specific table, which indicates that the higher acid treatment time is more beneficial to improving the surface Pt content and the specific surface area, and further improving the catalytic activity, but the excessive acid treatment can cause slight agglomeration, so that the surface Pt content is reduced, preferably, the acid treatment time is 60-120 min, further 90-120 min, and further 90 min; during the reduction, the atmosphere selected was a mixture of nitrogen and hydrogen, further 10% H2+90%N2(ii) a The reduction temperature is 120-180 ℃, further 150 ℃, and the reduction time is 20-40 min, further 30 min.
Compared with the conventional Pt-based perovskite catalyst, the method has the advantages that by selecting a proper roasting temperature and combining acid treatment, Pt atoms can be segregated on the surface of the catalyst, the Pt content exposed on the surface is obviously improved, the utilization rate of Pt is improved, and the catalytic activity of the Pt-based perovskite catalyst is improved.
A second aspect of the present invention provides a Pt-based perovskite-type catalyst obtained by the method for preparing a Pt-based perovskite-type catalyst provided by the first aspect of the present invention.
Example 1
(1) Dissolving 0.1mol of lanthanum nitrate, 0.08mol of cobalt nitrate and 0.02mol of chloroplatinic acid in 300ml of deionized water, adding 0.2mol of citric acid, stirring for 60min, then placing into a 110 ℃ oven for 20h for drying, and then baking at 1000 DEG CFiring for 4h to obtain LaCo0.8Pt0.2O3A perovskite;
(2) mixing LaCo0.8Pt0.2O3Soaking perovskite in 5mol/L nitric acid for 90min (solid-to-liquid ratio is 1 g: 8ml), washing with deionized water, vacuum filtering, drying, and adding 10% H2+90%N2Reducing for 30min at 150 ℃ in atmosphere to obtain Pt/LaCo with Pt particles distributed on the surface0.8Pt0.2O3Perovskite catalyst (LCP-1000-H90 below).
Example 2
(1) Dissolving 0.1mol of lanthanum nitrate, 0.095mol of manganese nitrate and 0.005mol of chloroplatinic acid in 300ml of deionized water, adding 0.12mol of citric acid, stirring for 30min, then placing in a 90 ℃ oven for 30h for drying, and then roasting for 3h at 1000 ℃ to obtain LaMn0.95Pt0.05O3A perovskite;
(2) mixing LaMn0.95Pt0.05O3Soaking perovskite in 6mol/L nitric acid for 90min (solid-to-liquid ratio is 1 g: 5ml), washing with deionized water, vacuum filtering, drying, and adding 10% H2+90%N2Reducing for 40min at 120 ℃ in atmosphere to obtain Pt/LaMn with Pt particles distributed on the surface0.95Pt0.05O3Perovskite catalyst (hereinafter LMP-1000-H90).
Example 3
(1) Dissolving 0.1mol of lanthanum nitrate, 0.07mol of aluminum nitrate and 0.03mol of chloroplatinic acid in 300ml of deionized water, adding 0.24mol of citric acid, stirring for 45min, then placing in a 120 ℃ oven for 15h for drying, and then roasting for 5h at 1000 ℃ to obtain LaAl0.7Pt0.3O3A perovskite;
(2) mixing LaAl0.7Pt0.3O3Soaking in 3mol/L nitric acid for perovskite for 90min (solid-to-liquid ratio is 1 g: 10ml), washing with deionized water, vacuum filtering, drying, and adding 10% H2+90%N2Reducing for 20min at 180 ℃ in the atmosphere to obtain Pt/LaAl with Pt particles distributed on the surface0.7Pt0.3O3Perovskite catalyst (hereinafter LAP-1000-H90).
Example 4
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 4, the calcination temperature is 650 deg.C, and the obtained Pt/LaCo0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter designated LCP-650-H90.
Example 5
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 5, the calcination temperature is 850 deg.C, and the obtained Pt/LaCo0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter LCP-850-H90.
Example 6
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 6, the calcination temperature is 1100 ℃, and the Pt/LaCo obtained0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter designated LCP-1100-H90.
Example 7
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 7, the calcination temperature was 1200 deg.C, and the Pt/LaCo obtained0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter designated LCP-1200-H90.
Example 8
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 8, the calcination temperature is 1300 ℃ and the Pt/LaCo obtained0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter LCP-1300-H90.
Example 9
The only difference compared to example 1 is that in example 9, the acid treatment time was 15min, and the Pt/LaCo obtained0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter designated LCP-1000-H15.
Example 10
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 10, the acid treatment time was 30min, and the obtained Pt/LaCo0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter designated LCP-1000-H30.
Example 11
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 11, the acid treatment time was 60min, and the obtained Pt/LaCo0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter designated LCP-1000-H60.
Example 12
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in example 12, the acid treatment time was 120min, and the obtained Pt/LaCo0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter LCP-1000-H120.
Comparative example 1
The only difference compared with example 1 is that in comparative example 1, Pt/LaCo is obtained without acid treatment and directly reduced after high temperature roasting0.8Pt0.2O3The perovskite catalyst is hereinafter LCP-1000.
Test group 1
The catalysts obtained in examples 1 to 12 and comparative example 1 were subjected to surface atomic ratio analysis and specific surface area analysis, and the results are shown in table 1; wherein, the surface atomic ratio analysis is carried out on Thermo ESCALAB 250, an Al Ka target (1486.6eV) is adopted as a light source, and C1 s-284.8 eV is adopted as an internal standard to correct the charge effect of the surface of the sample; specific surface area was measured on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument by N at 77K2Adsorption test and calculation by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method.
TABLE 1
As can be seen from Table 1, the Pt-based perovskite catalysts obtained in embodiments 1-12 of the present invention have a high surface Pt atomic ratio distribution, which is beneficial to improving the Pt utilization rate, thereby improving the electrochemical performance.
It can be seen from comparison between example 1 and examples 4 to 8 that, as the calcination temperature increases, the surface Pt content increases rapidly and then decreases slowly, and the specific surface area decreases gradually, which indicates that a higher calcination temperature is favorable for increasing the surface Pt content, but an excessively high temperature may cause a significant decrease in the specific surface area, but is unfavorable for increasing the catalytic activity, because the perovskite structure formed by low-temperature calcination is unstable, and the excessive dissolution causes Pt to agglomerate, so that the low-temperature calcination causes the surface Pt content to be lower, and the high-temperature calcination is favorable for increasing the crystallinity, thereby decreasing the specific surface area.
As can be seen from comparison between the example 1 and the examples 9 to 12, the surface Pt content also shows a trend of rising first and then falling along with the increase of the acid treatment time, and meanwhile, the acid treatment time can slightly increase the specific surface table, which shows that the longer acid treatment time is more beneficial to improving the surface Pt content and the specific surface area, so that the catalytic activity is improved, but the slight agglomeration is caused by the excessive acid treatment, so that the surface Pt content is reduced.
Comparative example 1, which was not acid treated, had a lower Pt content on the surface than example 1, probably because the absence of acid treatment did not favor more Pt exposed on the perovskite surface.
Test group 2
TEM tests were performed on the samples of examples 1, 4, 5, 12 and comparative example 1, and the results are shown in FIGS. 2 to 4. Among them, the TEM test was carried out in a transmission electron microscope (JEM-2100) of Japan Electron corporation (JEOL) at an electron acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The preparation method of the sample is as follows: and (3) taking a small amount of sample, ultrasonically dispersing the sample in absolute ethyl alcohol for 10min, taking 1-2 drops of liquid by using a dropper, dropwise adding the liquid on a carbon film, drying and testing.
As can be seen from the comparison of FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, after 90 minutes of acid treatment, the calcined LCP of 650 deg.C (example 4) and 850 deg.C (example 5) has different degrees of Pt agglomeration, which is probably due to the fact that the synthesized LCP has more defect sites on the surface at lower calcination temperature, so that the La and Co are excessively dissolved to collapse the surface structure, and further Pt agglomeration occurs; compared with the LCP surface (figure 1) baked at 1000 ℃, the structure is more stable, and the Pt nano particles are uniformly distributed on the surface of the catalyst after the acid treatment.
As can be seen from FIGS. 2 and 4, the LCP-1000 (comparative example 1) sample calcined at 1000 ℃ has a small amount of Pt nanoparticles with the size of 2-3 nm on the surface, and after 90 minutes of acid treatment (example 1), the Pt nanoparticles are obviously increased, which shows that after high-temperature treatment, a part of Pt in the LCP-1000 sample is segregated to the surface of the catalyst, but most of Pt is still uniformly dispersed in the internal crystal lattice of the perovskite and cannot be fully utilized, and after acid treatment, the segregation degree of Pt to the surface is obviously increased, so that the utilization rate of Pt is improved. When the acid treatment time was extended to 120min (example 12), slight agglomeration of Pt on the catalyst surface resulted.
The above description is only for the preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the technical scope of the present invention are included in the scope of the present invention.