CN109545346B - Method and device for unilateral capability evaluation of detection system - Google Patents
Method and device for unilateral capability evaluation of detection system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109545346B CN109545346B CN201811347492.6A CN201811347492A CN109545346B CN 109545346 B CN109545346 B CN 109545346B CN 201811347492 A CN201811347492 A CN 201811347492A CN 109545346 B CN109545346 B CN 109545346B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- standard
- sided
- capability
- detection system
- index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 250
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 34
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000003759 clinical diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- RNAMYOYQYRYFQY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(4,4-difluoropiperidin-1-yl)-6-methoxy-n-(1-propan-2-ylpiperidin-4-yl)-7-(3-pyrrolidin-1-ylpropoxy)quinazolin-4-amine Chemical compound N1=C(N2CCC(F)(F)CC2)N=C2C=C(OCCCN3CCCC3)C(OC)=CC2=C1NC1CCN(C(C)C)CC1 RNAMYOYQYRYFQY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000010887 Aglaia odorata Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000000595 Aglaia odorata Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012742 biochemical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001175 cerebrospinal fluid Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002124 endocrine Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004020 luminiscence type Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003340 mental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H40/00—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices
- G16H40/20—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
本发明实施例公开的检测系统的单侧能力评估方法，通过响应于对预设的检验项目对应的若干检测系统的单侧能力评估指令，获取每一所述检测系统的本地单侧能力指数；根据每一所述检测系统的本地单侧能力指数进行标准化处理，获取对应的标准单侧能力指数；将每一所述检测系统的标准单侧能力指数由大到小进行排列，获取前20％的标准单侧能力指数；根据每一所述检测系统的标准单侧能力指数以及所述前20％的标准单侧能力指数评估所述检验项目对应的检测系统的单侧能力，则上层管理人员能通过标准化的单侧能力指数进行多个检测系统的比对,且通过具有代表性的前20％的标准单侧能力指数可快速获知该项目下所有检测设备的质量，方便快捷，实用性强。
The unilateral capability evaluation method of the detection system disclosed in the embodiment of the present invention obtains the local unilateral capability index of each detection system in response to the unilateral capability evaluation instructions of several detection systems corresponding to the preset inspection items; Standardize the local one-sided capability index of each detection system to obtain the corresponding standard one-sided capability index; rank the standard one-sided capability index of each detection system from large to small to obtain the top 20% According to the standard one-sided capability index of each testing system and the standard one-sided capability index of the top 20%, the one-sided capability of the inspection system corresponding to the inspection item is evaluated, and the upper management personnel The standardized unilateral ability index can be used to compare multiple detection systems, and the quality of all testing equipment under the project can be quickly known through the representative top 20% standard unilateral ability index, which is convenient, fast and practical. .
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of intelligent medical treatment, in particular to a unilateral capability assessment method and a unilateral capability assessment device of a detection system.
Background
For clinical diagnosis, clinical examination has important reference significance for medical practitioners, is a common examination means in hospital clinical laboratory, and generally takes human blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid and the like as samples, and provides basis for clinical diagnosis by examining the content of various biochemical components in the samples. The detection equipment for clinical examination is an instrument for carrying out automatic operation on sampling, reagent adding, interferent removing, mixing, automatic detection and the like in the biochemical analysis process, and the detection equipment needs to continuously detect and evaluate in the using process to ensure the normal work of the detection equipment so as to enable the medical equipment to better exert advantages, so that the daily evaluation of the medical equipment is indispensable. For the existing medical detection equipment, only a single detection system is subjected to quality evaluation, certain reference significance is lacked, and for high-level management personnel, the overall quality conditions of a plurality of detection systems under the same inspection project cannot be mastered, so that an effective and global improvement plan cannot be formulated.
In addition, the quality evaluation of the existing detection equipment is generally performed manually after collecting evaluation data by medical staff. Besides wasting the physical and mental investment of professionals, the quality of the manual evaluation detection equipment has the defect of easy error.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for evaluating the unilateral capability of a detection system, which can effectively solve the problem that the quality evaluation of the existing detection equipment lacks global evaluation, can realize automatic quality evaluation, and provide powerful reference for upper-layer managers, thereby making an effective global improvement plan.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating a single-side capability of a detection system, including:
responding to single-side capability evaluation instructions of a plurality of detection systems corresponding to a preset inspection item, and acquiring a local single-side capability index of each detection system;
carrying out standardization processing according to the local unilateral capability index of each detection system to obtain a corresponding standard unilateral capability index;
arranging the standard single-side capability indexes of each detection system from large to small to obtain the standard single-side capability index of the first 20 percent;
and evaluating the single-side capacity of the detection system corresponding to the inspection item according to the standard single-side capacity index of each detection system and the standard single-side capacity index of the first 20 percent.
Compared with the prior art, the method for evaluating the unilateral capability of the detection system disclosed by the embodiment of the invention has the advantages that the local unilateral capability index of each detection system is obtained by responding to unilateral capability evaluation instructions of a plurality of detection systems corresponding to a preset inspection item; carrying out standardization processing according to the local unilateral capability index of each detection system to obtain a corresponding standard unilateral capability index; arranging the standard single-side capability indexes of each detection system from large to small to obtain the standard single-side capability index of the first 20 percent; according to each detection system's standard unilateral ability index and first 20% standard unilateral ability index aassessment the detection system's that the inspection item corresponds unilateral ability, then upper management personnel can not only obtain single detection system's quality assessment condition, can also carry out a plurality of detection system's comparison through standardized unilateral ability index, avoid local unilateral ability index standard non-uniform and can't carry out mutual comparison and statistical analysis, thereby can't provide global quality assessment result for upper management personnel, and can learn the quality of all check out test set under this item fast through representative first 20% standard unilateral ability index, and is convenient and fast, and the practicality is strong.
As an improvement of the above-mentioned scheme, the step of performing normalization processing according to the local one-sided capability index of each detection system to obtain the corresponding standard one-sided capability index specifically includes:
and acquiring a first ratio of the standard maximum allowable error and the local maximum allowable error, and multiplying the local single-side capacity index by the first ratio to generate the standard single-side capacity index.
As an improvement of the above scheme, the local maximum allowable error includes a local absolute value error and a local percentage error, and the standard maximum allowable error includes a standard absolute value error and a standard percentage error;
the step of performing standardization processing according to the local unilateral capability index of each detection system to obtain a corresponding standard unilateral capability index specifically comprises the following steps:
if the detection result of the detection system is smaller than a preset first threshold value, acquiring a second ratio of the standard absolute value error to the local absolute value error, and multiplying the local one-sided capability index by the second ratio to generate the standard one-sided capability index;
and if the detection result of the detection system is greater than or equal to the first threshold and smaller than a preset second threshold, acquiring a third ratio of the standard percentage error to the local percentage error, and multiplying the local one-side capacity index by the third ratio to generate the standard one-side capacity index.
As an improvement of the above solution, the local one-sided capability index is generated by:
responding to a single-side capacity evaluation instruction of any detection system, and acquiring a preset maximum allowable error, a preset frame mean value, and an average value and a standard deviation of n detection results of the detection system on a sample; wherein the n inspection results are the n inspection results closest to the current moment, and n is more than or equal to 2;
calculating an original unilateral capacity index of the detection system according to the maximum allowable error, the frame mean, the average value and the standard deviation;
and taking the minimum value of all original unilateral capacity indexes of the detection system in a preset time period as the local unilateral capacity index of the detection system.
As an improvement of the above scheme, the calculating an original unilateral capability index of the detection system according to the maximum allowable error, the frame mean, the average value, and the standard deviation specifically includes:
if the current test result of the test system on the sample is smaller than the first threshold value, calculating the original unilateral capability index of the test system according to the local absolute value error, the frame mean value, the average value and the standard deviation;
and if the test result of the current detection system on the sample is greater than or equal to the first threshold and less than the second threshold, calculating the original unilateral capacity index of the detection system according to the local percentage error, the frame mean, the average value and the standard deviation.
As an improvement of the above scheme, the calculating an original single-side capability index of the detection system according to the maximum allowable error, a preset frame mean, a preset mean, and a preset standard deviation specifically includes:
calculating a one-sided capability index for the detection system according to the following formula:
Cpk1＝(AVG1+E1-AVG2)/(3*SD)
Cpk2＝(AVG2-(AVG1-E1)/(3*SD)
Cpk＝min(|Cpk1|,|Cpk2|)
wherein Cpk is a unilateral capability index of the detection system, Cpk1 is a right-side capability index of the detection system, and Cpk2 is a left-side capability index of the detection system; AVG1 is the frame mean, AVG2 is the mean, E1 is the absolute value error, SD is the standard deviation;
the step of calculating the original unilateral capability index of the detection system according to the percentage error specifically comprises the following steps:
calculating a one-sided capability index for the detection system according to the following formula:
Cpk1＝(AVG1+AVG1*E2-AVG2)/(3*SD)
Cpk2＝(AVG2-(AVG1-AVG1*E2)/(3*SD)
Cpk＝min(|Cpk1|,|Cpk2|)
wherein Cpk is a unilateral capability index of the detection system, Cpk1 is a right-side capability index of the detection system, and Cpk2 is a left-side capability index of the detection system; AVG1 is the frame mean, AVG2 is the mean, E2 is the percent error, and SD is the standard deviation.
As an improvement of the above, the method further comprises the steps of:
taking the minimum value of all original unilateral capability indexes of the detection system in a preset time period as a local unilateral capability index of the detection system:
acquiring the actual date of the current time point at a preset time point;
when the actual date is consistent with a preset date value, acquiring all original unilateral capacity indexes in a preset time period;
and taking the minimum value of all the original unilateral capacity indexes in the time period as the local unilateral capacity index of the detection system.
As an improvement of the above, the method further comprises:
when the standard single-side capacity index is in a preset first range, dividing the standard single-side capacity index into a first grade;
when the standard single-side capacity index is in a preset second range, dividing the standard single-side capacity index into a second grade;
when the standard single-side capacity index is within a preset third range, dividing the standard single-side capacity index into a third grade;
and when the standard unilateral capacity index is within a preset fourth range, dividing the standard unilateral capacity index into a fourth grade.
As a modification of the above, the first range is an interval less than 1; the second range is an interval of greater than or equal to 1 and less than 1.33; the third range is an interval of greater than or equal to 1.33 and less than 2; the fourth range is an interval greater than 2 or equal to 2.
As an improvement of the scheme, in response to a single-side capability viewing instruction for any detection device, the standard single-side capability index and the corresponding grade of the detection device are displayed, and the standard single-side capability index and the corresponding grade of the top 20% of the corresponding items are displayed.
As an improvement of the above solution, the evaluating the single-side capability of the detection system corresponding to the inspection item according to the standard single-side capability index of each detection system and the standard single-side capability index of the top 20% specifically includes:
when the standard single-side capacity index of the detection equipment corresponds to a first grade or a second grade and a third grade and a fourth grade corresponding to the first 20% of standard single-side capacity, sending out a prompt needing individual improvement;
when the standard single-side capacity index of the detection equipment corresponds to a first grade or a second grade and the first 20% of standard single-side capacity corresponds to the first grade or the second grade, sending a prompt needing to be improved together;
and when the standard unilateral capability index of the detection equipment corresponds to the third grade and the fourth grade, sending out an unbiased prompt.
As an improvement of the above, the method further comprises the steps of:
responding to a historical unilateral capability viewing instruction of any detection device, and displaying a plurality of latest N standard unilateral capability indexes and corresponding grades of the detection device; wherein N is more than or equal to 5;
counting the number of X standard single-side capacity indexes belonging to a first grade or a second grade from the last standard single-side capacity index; wherein there are no consecutive s standard unilateral capability indexes belonging to a third or fourth level in the X standard unilateral capability indexes; wherein X is more than or equal to 1, and s is more than or equal to 1.
Another embodiment of the present invention correspondingly provides a single-side capability evaluation device for a detection system, including:
the response module is used for responding to single-side capability evaluation instructions of a plurality of detection systems corresponding to a preset inspection item and acquiring a local single-side capability index of each detection system;
the standardization processing module is used for carrying out standardization processing according to the local one-side capacity index of each detection system to obtain a corresponding standard one-side capacity index;
the arrangement module is used for arranging the standard single-side capability indexes of each detection system from large to small to obtain the standard single-side capability index of the first 20 percent;
and the single-side capacity evaluation module is used for evaluating the single-side capacity of the detection system corresponding to the inspection item according to the standard single-side capacity index of each detection system and the standard single-side capacity index of the top 20 percent.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a single-sided capability evaluation method for a detection system, which includes a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, the single-sided capability evaluation method for a detection system according to any of the above embodiments of the present invention is implemented.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, where the computer-readable storage medium includes a stored computer program, where when the computer program runs, the apparatus where the computer-readable storage medium is located is controlled to execute the method for evaluating the single-side capability of the detection system according to any one of the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating the single-sided capability of a detection system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of the calculation group establishment according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating the establishment of a single-sided capability index evaluation of a detection system for a TSH project according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of an addition detection system for TSH items according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of maximum allowable errors correspondingly adopted by the first threshold and the second threshold according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a comparison of standard one-sided capability indices and ratings provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a comparison of standard one-sided capability indices and ratings provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the single-sided capabilities of any of the test devices provided by one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating the single-sided capabilities of any of the test devices provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating historical single-sided capabilities of any of the test devices provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 11 is a schematic structural diagram of a single-side capability evaluation device of a detection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 12 is a schematic structural diagram of a single-side capability evaluation device of a detection system according to an embodiment of the present invention
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, a schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating a single-side capability of a detection system according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown, including:
s1, responding to single-side capability evaluation instructions of a plurality of detection systems corresponding to a preset inspection item, and acquiring a local single-side capability index of each detection system;
there is a clear scale for the quality of the product, and it is also a problem that the target value deviates too much, in theory. The unilateral index accounts for deviations in target values, primarily to see how much systematic variation is accommodated by the deviated portion.
In step S1, before sending the single-side capability evaluation instructions of several detection systems, the user is required to add a project group (i.e., the calculation group in fig. 2), and only the detection systems in the same calculation group can calculate and compare, for example, if the detection system detects the same project a, the detection system can have instruments in martian, guangzhou, or fertile, the detection systems in these several places are added into one group for comparison. As shown in fig. 3, is a one-sided capability index evaluation of the test items for item TSH. As shown in FIG. 4, a schematic diagram of an added detection system, such as a "Roche" detection device provided by Wuhan laboratories under the TSH project for luminescence but endocrine stations, is shown, with the device number 000001.
S2, carrying out standardization processing according to the local unilateral capability index of each detection system to obtain a corresponding standard unilateral capability index;
for local (e.g., wuhan) quality assessment, local criteria are configured, and therefore, if local one-sided capability indices under different criteria need to be aligned and counted, unified normalization is required. In this step, a first ratio of a standard maximum allowable error to a local maximum allowable error is obtained, and the standard single-side capability index is generated by multiplying the local single-side capability index by the first ratio.
Wherein the local maximum allowed error comprises a local absolute value error and a local percentage error, and the standard maximum allowed error comprises a standard absolute value error and a standard percentage error. Then, the step of performing standardization processing according to the local unilateral capability index of each detection system to obtain a corresponding standard unilateral capability index specifically includes:
if the detection result of the detection system is smaller than a preset first threshold value, acquiring a second ratio of the standard absolute value error to the local absolute value error, and multiplying the local one-sided capability index by the second ratio to generate the standard one-sided capability index;
and if the detection result of the detection system is greater than or equal to the first threshold and smaller than a preset second threshold, acquiring a third ratio of the standard percentage error to the local percentage error, and multiplying the local one-side capacity index by the third ratio to generate the standard one-side capacity index.
For example, when the test result of the detection device is less than 40 (i.e., the first threshold), the local absolute value error is 2, the local one-sided capability index is 0.38, and the standard absolute value error is 5, then the standard one-sided capability index is 5/(2 × 0.38) ═ 0.95.
Preferably, the local one-sided capability index is generated by:
responding to a single-side capacity evaluation instruction of any detection system, and acquiring a preset maximum allowable error, a preset frame mean value, and an average value and a standard deviation of n detection results of the detection system on a sample; wherein the n inspection results are the n inspection results closest to the current moment, and n is more than or equal to 2;
calculating an original unilateral capacity index of the detection system according to the maximum allowable error, the frame mean, the average value and the standard deviation;
and taking the minimum value of all original unilateral capacity indexes of the detection system in a preset time period as the local unilateral capacity index of the detection system.
It will be appreciated that each calculated raw single-sided capability index (e.g., once per day) is stored in memory in turn. When n is 5, then each time the original one-sided capability index is calculated, the standard deviation and mean of the first 5 test results are taken. In addition, n may not be fixed as a constant, but is set as the number of the first test result (i.e. the start of the unsealing use) to the current test result of the sample by the detection system.
Specifically, at a preset time point, acquiring an actual date to which the time point belongs;
when the actual date is consistent with a preset date value, acquiring all original unilateral capacity indexes in a preset time period;
and taking the minimum value of all the original unilateral capacity indexes in the time period as the local unilateral capacity index of the detection system.
For example, 5, 15 and 25 of each month are set, and the local one-side capability index of the detection system is standardized to obtain a standard one-side capability index, where the local one-side capability index corresponding to 15 is the minimum value of all original one-side capability indexes from 5 to 15 of this month, similarly, the local one-side capability index corresponding to 5 is the minimum value of all original one-side capability indexes from 25 to 5 of this month, and the local one-side capability index corresponding to 25 is the minimum value of all original one-side capability indexes from 15 to 25 of this month.
Wherein, the calculating the original single-side capability index of the detection system according to the maximum allowable error, the frame mean, the mean and the standard deviation specifically comprises:
if the current test result of the test system on the sample is smaller than the first threshold value, calculating the original unilateral capability index of the test system according to the local absolute value error, the frame mean value, the average value and the standard deviation; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
calculating a one-sided capability index for the detection system according to the following formula:
Cpk1＝(AVG1+E1-AVG2)/(3*SD)
Cpk2＝(AVG2-(AVG1-E1)/(3*SD)
Cpk＝min(|Cpk1|,|Cpk2|)
wherein Cpk is a unilateral capability index of the detection system, Cpk1 is a right-side capability index of the detection system, and Cpk2 is a left-side capability index of the detection system; AVG1 is the frame mean, AVG2 is the mean, E1 is the absolute value error, SD is the standard deviation;
if the test result of the current detection system on the sample is greater than or equal to the first threshold and smaller than the second threshold, calculating the original unilateral capacity index of the detection system according to the local percentage error, the frame mean, the average value and the standard deviation; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
calculating a one-sided capability index for the detection system according to the following formula:
Cpk1＝(AVG1+AVG1*E2-AVG2)/(3*SD)
Cpk2＝(AVG2-(AVG1-AVG1*E2)/(3*SD)
Cpk＝min(|Cpk1|,|Cpk2|)
wherein Cpk is a unilateral capability index of the detection system, Cpk1 is a right-side capability index of the detection system, and Cpk2 is a left-side capability index of the detection system; AVG1 is the frame mean, AVG2 is the mean, E2 is the percent error, and SD is the standard deviation.
Wherein the frame mean is a preset constant; or, the frame mean is an average of all test results of the test system on the sample in a preset second time period.
For example, as shown in fig. 5, the first threshold is 40, the second threshold is 500, and when the first threshold is less than 40, the local maximum allowable error is in the form of an absolute value, which corresponds to 5; when greater than or equal to 40 and less than 500, the local maximum allowable error is in the form of a percentage, corresponding to 20%.
S3, arranging the standard single-side capability indexes of each detection system from large to small to obtain the standard single-side capability index of the first 20 percent;
in step S3, a method of twenty-eight law is adopted to obtain the reference value of the global quality parameter. Two eight laws, also known as 80/20 law, Pareto's law, also called barrett's law, Juran's law, Critical Ferule, the most labor-saving law of the least important majority law (Trivial ManyRule), imbalance law, represent the meaning that, in any group of things, the most important of them is only a small fraction, about 20%, the remaining 80%, although the majority, is of secondary importance. Therefore, in the invention, the parameters which are beneficial for the management layer to carry out overall quality evaluation can be quickly acquired by introducing the twenty-eight law.
And S4, evaluating the unilateral capacity of the detection system corresponding to the inspection item according to the standard unilateral capacity index of each detection system and the standard unilateral capacity index of the top 20 percent.
In another preferred embodiment, when the standard one-sided capability index is within a preset first range, the standard one-sided capability index is divided into a first grade;
when the standard single-side capacity index is in a preset second range, dividing the standard single-side capacity index into a second grade;
when the standard single-side capacity index is within a preset third range, dividing the standard single-side capacity index into a third grade;
and when the standard unilateral capacity index is within a preset fourth range, dividing the standard unilateral capacity index into a fourth grade.
Wherein the first range is an interval less than 1; the second range is an interval of greater than or equal to 1 and less than 1.33; the third range is an interval of greater than or equal to 1.33 and less than 2; the fourth range is an interval greater than 2 or equal to 2.
Wherein, when the register corresponding to the standard one-sided capability index is displayed, 1, 2, 3 and 4 can be respectively corresponding to a first level, a second level, a third level and a fourth level, as shown in fig. 6. The first level, the second level, the third level and the fourth level may also be respectively corresponded with 0, 2, 4 and 8, as shown in fig. 7. When the standard unilateral capability index corresponds to a first grade, the detection system is indicated to be in a state of deviation to be improved; when the standard unilateral capability index corresponds to a second grade, the detection system is general in deviation; when the standard single-side capability index corresponds to a third grade, the detection system has good deviation; when the standard one-sided capability index corresponds to the fourth level, it indicates that the detection system is excellent in offset. In practical application, the first level can be marked as dark red, the second level can be marked as light red, the third level can be marked as light green, and the fourth level can be marked as dark green, so that a user can more intuitively acquire required information and can quickly acquire a detection system belonging to the first level or the second level, and corresponding improvement measures can be taken.
Preferably, as shown in fig. 8, in response to a one-sided capability viewing instruction for any one of the detection devices, the standard one-sided capability index and the corresponding rating of the detection device are displayed, and the standard one-sided capability index of the top 20% and the corresponding rating under the corresponding item are displayed. For example, 1.1/2.4 under the column "results" in the figure, 1.1 representing the standard one-sided capability index of the test device, 2.4 representing the standard one-sided capability index of the top 20%; 2/4 under the column "IS" in the figure, 2 represents the grade corresponding to the standard one-sided capability index of the detection device, and 4 represents the grade corresponding to the standard one-sided capability index of the first 20%.
In another preferred embodiment, as shown in fig. 9, in response to a single-sided capability viewing instruction for any one of the detection devices, the standard single-sided capability index of the detection device and the corresponding grade are displayed, and the standard single-sided capability index of the detection device is displayed in the ranking (e.g., 0% -25%, 25% -50%, etc.) of the standard capability indexes of all the detection devices. For example, the column "result" in the figure represents the standard single-sided capability index of the detection device, and the column IS represents the grade corresponding to the standard single-sided capability index of the detection device.
In step S4, the evaluating the single-sided capability of the detection system corresponding to the inspection item according to the standard single-sided capability index of each detection system and the standard single-sided capability index of the top 20% is specifically:
when the standard single-side capacity index of the detection equipment corresponds to a first grade or a second grade and a third grade and a fourth grade corresponding to the first 20% of standard single-side capacity, sending out a prompt needing individual improvement;
when the standard single-side capacity index of the detection equipment corresponds to a first grade or a second grade and the first 20% of standard single-side capacity corresponds to the first grade or the second grade, sending a prompt needing to be improved together;
and when the standard unilateral capability index of the detection equipment corresponds to the third grade and the fourth grade, sending out an unbiased prompt.
For example, when the single inspection apparatus and the standard single-side capability of the first 20% correspond to the grade ratios of 1/3, 1/4, 2/3, 2/4 and 3/4, a prompt for individual improvement is issued, so that the overall offset quality of the inspection item corresponding to the item is proved to be better, and the offset quality of the single inspection apparatus needs to be improved; when the grade ratio of the single detection device to the standard single-side capacity of the first 20% is 2/1, 1/1, 1/2 and 2/2, sending a prompt that the common improvement is needed, wherein the prompt shows that the overall offset quality of the detection item corresponding to the item needs to be improved, and the offset quality of the single detection device also needs to be improved; when the grade ratio of the single detection device to the standard single-side capacity of the first 20% is 3/1, 4/1, 3/2, 4/2, 4/3, 3/3 and 4/4, an undistorted prompt is sent out, which indicates that the deviation quality of the single detection device is better, and the overall deviation quality of the detection item corresponding to the item needs to be improved.
Besides the standard steady state index of a single date of a single detection device, the historical standard steady state index of a plurality of dates of the single detection device can be checked, and the method further comprises the following steps:
responding to a historical unilateral capability viewing instruction of any detection device, and displaying a plurality of latest N standard unilateral capability indexes and corresponding grades of the detection device; wherein N is more than or equal to 5;
arranging the N standard single-side capability indexes according to the time sequence, and counting the number of X standard steady-state indexes belonging to a first level or a second level from the last standard steady-state index; wherein there are no consecutive s of the X standard steady-state indices that belong to a third or fourth level; wherein X is more than or equal to 1, and s is more than or equal to 1.
For example, as shown in fig. 10, the "cumulative number of times" is the number of X standard steady-state indexes belonging to the first rank or the second rank. Assuming that s is 3, accumulation is performed from the last standard steady-state index (corresponding to time 2018.4.25), the standard steady-state indexes belonging to the first rank or the second rank are counted, and when there are 3 or more consecutive third ranks or fourth ranks, accumulation is stopped, and the number of times of accumulation is saved.
For the local manager, it can also obtain the number of detection systems at each level and the average of the levels, and can analyze the quality of the detection systems of the local company from multiple dimensions.
Based on the above scheme, upper management personnel can not only obtain the quality assessment condition of a single detection system, can also carry out comparison of a plurality of detection systems through standardized unilateral ability index, avoid local unilateral ability index standard non-unity and can't carry out mutual comparison and statistical analysis, thereby can't provide global quality assessment result for upper management personnel, and can learn the quality of all check out test set that this project corresponds fast through representative first 20% standard unilateral ability index, and is convenient and fast, therefore, the clothes hanger is strong in practicability.
As shown in fig. 11, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a single-side capability evaluation apparatus for a detection system, including:
the response module 101 is configured to respond to a single-side capability evaluation instruction of a plurality of detection systems corresponding to a preset inspection item, and obtain a local single-side capability index of each detection system;
the standardization processing module 102 is configured to perform standardization processing according to the local one-sided capability index of each detection system to obtain a corresponding standard one-sided capability index;
the arrangement module 103 is configured to arrange the standard single-side capability indexes of each detection system from large to small to obtain the standard single-side capability index of the first 20%;
and the single-side capacity evaluation module 104 is used for evaluating the single-side capacity of the detection system corresponding to the inspection item according to the standard single-side capacity index of each detection system and the standard single-side capacity index of the top 20%.
The implementation process and the working principle of the single-side capability evaluation device of the detection system according to the embodiment of the present invention may refer to any description of the single-side capability evaluation method of the detection system, and are not described herein again.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a single-side capability evaluation apparatus of a detection system, including a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, where the processor implements the single-side capability evaluation method of the detection system according to any one of the above embodiments of the present invention when executing the computer program.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, where the computer-readable storage medium includes a stored computer program, where when the computer program runs, the apparatus where the computer-readable storage medium is located is controlled to execute the method for evaluating the single-side capability of the detection system according to any one of the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention.
Fig. 12 is a schematic view of a single-side capability evaluation device of the detection system according to the embodiment of the invention. The unilateral capability evaluation device of the detection system comprises: at least one processor 11, such as a CPU, at least one network interface 14 or other user interface 13, a memory 15, at least one communication bus 12, the communication bus 12 being used to enable connectivity communications between these components. The user interface 13 may optionally include a USB interface, and other standard interfaces, wired interfaces. The network interface 14 may optionally include a Wi-Fi interface as well as other wireless interfaces. The memory 15 may comprise a high-speed RAM memory, and may also include a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), such as at least one disk memory. The memory 15 may optionally comprise at least one memory device located remotely from the aforementioned processor 11.
In some embodiments, memory 15 stores the following elements, executable modules or data structures, or a subset thereof, or an expanded set thereof:
an operating system 151 containing various system programs such as a battery management system and the like for implementing various basic services and processing hardware-based tasks;
and (5) a procedure 152.
Specifically, the processor 11 is configured to call the program 152 stored in the memory 15 to execute the single-side capability evaluation method of the detection system according to the above embodiment, for example, step S11 shown in fig. 1. Alternatively, the processor 11, when executing the computer program, implements the functions of the modules/units in the above-mentioned device embodiments, such as the arrangement module 103.
Illustratively, the computer program may be partitioned into one or more modules/units that are stored in the memory and executed by the processor to implement the invention. The one or more modules/units may be a series of computer program instruction segments capable of performing specific functions, which are used to describe the execution process of the computer program in the single-sided capability evaluation device of the detection system.
The single-sided capability assessment device of the detection system may include, but is not limited to, a processor 11, a memory 15. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the schematic diagram is merely an example of a single-side capability evaluation device of a detection system, and does not constitute a limitation of the single-side capability evaluation device of the detection system, and may include more or less components than those shown, or combine some components, or different components, for example, the single-side capability evaluation device of the detection system may further include an input-output device, a network access device, a bus, etc.
The Processor 11 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), an off-the-shelf Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other Programmable logic device, discrete Gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, etc. The general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like, and the processor 11 is the control center of the single-sided capability assessment apparatus of the detection system, and various interfaces and lines are used to connect the various parts of the single-sided capability assessment apparatus of the entire detection system.
The memory 15 may be used to store the computer programs and/or modules, and the processor 11 implements various functions of the single-sided capability assessment apparatus of the detection system by running or executing the computer programs and/or modules stored in the memory and invoking data stored in the memory. The memory 15 may mainly include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area may store an operating system, an application program required by at least one function (such as a sound playing function, an image playing function, etc.), and the like; the storage data area may store data (such as audio data, a phonebook, etc.) created according to the use of the cellular phone, and the like. Further, the memory 15 may include high speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card), at least one magnetic disk storage device, a Flash memory device, or other volatile solid state storage device.
Wherein, the module/unit integrated with the single-side capability evaluation device of the detection system can be stored in a computer readable storage medium if it is realized in the form of software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product. Based on such understanding, all or part of the flow of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention may also be implemented by a computer program, which may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method embodiments may be implemented. Wherein the computer program comprises computer program code, which may be in the form of source code, object code, an executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, recording medium, usb disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, Read-only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), electrical carrier wave signals, telecommunications signals, software distribution medium, etc. It should be noted that the computer readable medium may contain content that is subject to appropriate increase or decrease as required by legislation and patent practice in jurisdictions, for example, in some jurisdictions, computer readable media does not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunications signals as is required by legislation and patent practice.
While the foregoing is directed to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (13)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811347492.6A CN109545346B (en) | 2018-11-13 | 2018-11-13 | Method and device for unilateral capability evaluation of detection system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811347492.6A CN109545346B (en) | 2018-11-13 | 2018-11-13 | Method and device for unilateral capability evaluation of detection system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109545346A CN109545346A (en) | 2019-03-29 |
| CN109545346B true CN109545346B (en) | 2021-10-19 |
Family
ID=65847177
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811347492.6A Active CN109545346B (en) | 2018-11-13 | 2018-11-13 | Method and device for unilateral capability evaluation of detection system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109545346B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN119324033A (en) * | 2024-12-19 | 2025-01-17 | 江西一脉阳光云数据有限公司 | Medical image capability assessment method, device and computer readable storage medium |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103760814A (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2014-04-30 | 南京航空航天大学 | Multi-kind and small-quantity part production process capability index determining method based on features |
| CN106249146A (en) * | 2016-08-30 | 2016-12-21 | 河南中烟工业有限责任公司洛阳卷烟厂 | The analysis of a kind of cigar mill electric motor operation state and method for early warning |
| CN106845826A (en) * | 2017-01-18 | 2017-06-13 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of cold continuous rolling production line military service quality state appraisal procedure based on PCA Cpk |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5532941A (en) * | 1994-07-08 | 1996-07-02 | Lin; Lawrence I. | Inter-laboratory performance monitoring system |
| US7809170B2 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2010-10-05 | Louisiana Tech University Foundation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for choosing and evaluating sample size for biometric training process |
-
2018
- 2018-11-13 CN CN201811347492.6A patent/CN109545346B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103760814A (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2014-04-30 | 南京航空航天大学 | Multi-kind and small-quantity part production process capability index determining method based on features |
| CN106249146A (en) * | 2016-08-30 | 2016-12-21 | 河南中烟工业有限责任公司洛阳卷烟厂 | The analysis of a kind of cigar mill electric motor operation state and method for early warning |
| CN106845826A (en) * | 2017-01-18 | 2017-06-13 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of cold continuous rolling production line military service quality state appraisal procedure based on PCA Cpk |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 过程能力指数在单个实验室能力验证中的应用;夏琴等;《现代测量与实验室管理》;20051130(第6期);第40-41页 * |
| 面向检测实验室的测量系统分析理论与应用研究;汪洁;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 经济与管理科学辑》;20120315;第6-29页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109545346A (en) | 2019-03-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Howanitz et al. | Continuous wristband monitoring over 2 years decreases identification errors: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks Study | |
| Hawkins | Laboratory turnaround time | |
| Westgard et al. | Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system | |
| Zarbo et al. | Q-Tracks: a College of American Pathologists program of continuous laboratory monitoring and longitudinal performance tracking | |
| Loh et al. | Recommendations for laboratory informatics specifications needed for the application of patient-based real time quality control | |
| CN109598415A (en) | Method for evaluating quality and device, the computer readable storage medium of detection system | |
| US11094403B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for collecting test data from use of a disposable test kit | |
| CN111159043B (en) | Automatic identification method and system for testing risk | |
| CN106339569A (en) | Method and a device for determining abnormality of sample test result | |
| CN111145848A (en) | Method, device, medium and equipment for detecting adverse reaction events in clinical test | |
| CN109684332A (en) | A kind of wide table generating method of data, apparatus and system | |
| CN111080159A (en) | Risk monitoring method and system for quality supervision of clinical trial research center | |
| CN114117053A (en) | Disease classification model training method and device, storage medium and electronic device | |
| WO2015045012A1 (en) | Colony inspection program, colony inspection device, and colony inspection method | |
| Meier et al. | Seven Q-Tracks monitors of laboratory quality drive general performance improvement: experience from the College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks program 1999–2011 | |
| Schifman et al. | Point-of-care glucose critical values: a Q-probes study involving 50 health care facilities and 2349 critical results | |
| Rhoads et al. | A review of the current state of digital plate reading of cultures in clinical microbiology | |
| CN109545346B (en) | Method and device for unilateral capability evaluation of detection system | |
| CN113962507A (en) | Intelligent convenient industry-wide data analysis system and method based on SPC | |
| CN110222459B (en) | Individual height analysis method, system, readable storage medium and terminal | |
| CN104268680A (en) | Case detection process real-time synchronizing system | |
| US10973467B2 (en) | Method and system for automated diagnostics of none-infectious illnesses | |
| Doleck et al. | Assessing the utility of deep learning: Using learner-system interaction data from BioWorld | |
| CN109599173A (en) | The unilateral capability assessment method and device of detection system | |
| CN109036497B (en) | Method and device for analyzing detection result of medical laboratory |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CP02 | Change in the address of a patent holder |
Address after: 510700 No. 10, helix 3 Road, International Biological Island, Huangpu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province Patentee after: GUANGZHOU KINGMED CENTER FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY Address before: 510000, No. 2429, Xingang East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Haizhuqu District Patentee before: GUANGZHOU KINGMED CENTER FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY |
|
| CP02 | Change in the address of a patent holder |