CN108171385A - A kind of intelligent shared bicycle and public transport are most preferably gone on a journey the planing method of scheme - Google Patents
A kind of intelligent shared bicycle and public transport are most preferably gone on a journey the planing method of scheme Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108171385A CN108171385A CN201810024673.9A CN201810024673A CN108171385A CN 108171385 A CN108171385 A CN 108171385A CN 201810024673 A CN201810024673 A CN 201810024673A CN 108171385 A CN108171385 A CN 108171385A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- travel
- walking
- shared bicycle
- plan
- route
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/40—Business processes related to the transportation industry
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Navigation (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明属于交通规划与智能技术应用技术领域,具体涉及一种智能化共享单车与公共交通最佳出行方案的规划方法。The invention belongs to the technical field of traffic planning and intelligent technology application, and in particular relates to a planning method for an optimal travel scheme of intelligent shared bicycles and public transportation.
背景技术Background technique
公交优先作为我国的一项基本国策,在实践过程中遇到了各种各样的问题,其中,“换乘难”是阻碍公共交通出行的一个主要问题。“换乘难”问题主要表现在换乘耗时长以及换乘方便性差两方面。As a basic national policy of our country, bus priority has encountered various problems in the practice process, among which "difficulty in transferring" is a major problem hindering public transport travel. The problem of "difficult transfer" is mainly manifested in two aspects: long transfer time and poor transfer convenience.
共享单车的出现有利于解决城市交通“最后一公里”出行难题,极大的提高了换乘的便捷程度。从公共汽车以及轨道交通站点到出行始发地的目的地的这一段距离的出行往往由于耗用时长、拥挤程度、出行直达性等问题而导致诸多不便,步行耗时较长,私人自行车的经济安全问题,公共自行车的租赁点固定局限性都会导致出行不便。共享单车因可达性强,安全系数高,绿色环保,使用成本低,灵活度好等优点可以很好的缓解这一出行现象,使换乘便捷度得到极大改善。The emergence of shared bicycles is conducive to solving the "last mile" travel problem of urban traffic, which greatly improves the convenience of transfer. The distance from the bus and rail transit station to the destination of the origin of the trip often causes a lot of inconvenience due to problems such as time-consuming, congestion, and direct travel. It takes a long time to walk, and the economy of private bicycles Safety issues and the fixed limitations of the rental points of public bicycles will cause travel inconvenience. Shared bicycles can alleviate this travel phenomenon due to their strong accessibility, high safety factor, green environmental protection, low cost of use, and good flexibility, which greatly improves the convenience of transfers.
共享单车的出现一方面改良了换乘环境的同时,另一方面,也在一定程度上与公共交通形成了一定的竞争关系,尤其是在中短距离出行中与常规公交的竞争。此外,共享单车也存在很大程度上的低效率利用以及过度滥用的现象,因此,如何合理规划共享单车在城市交通出行体系中的功能定位,如何使共享单车更好的服务于公共交通的发展,如何让共享单车的出现能够更好的解决城市交通层次化出行、搭配等问题应当着眼分析、解决。The emergence of shared bicycles improves the transfer environment on the one hand, and on the other hand, it also forms a certain competition with public transportation to a certain extent, especially the competition with conventional buses in short- and medium-distance travel. In addition, shared bicycles also have a large degree of inefficient utilization and excessive abuse. Therefore, how to reasonably plan the functional positioning of shared bicycles in the urban transportation system and how to make shared bicycles better serve the development of public transportation , How to make the emergence of shared bicycles can better solve the problems of hierarchical travel and collocation of urban traffic should be analyzed and solved.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明公开了一种智能化共享单车与公共交通最佳出行方案的规划方法,通过将共享单车的出行与公共交通出行的有机组合的方式向出行者提供最优出行方案,从而达到共享单车更好的服务于公共交通,并能够使城市不同交通方式层之间的结合更加紧密,有利于城市出行断层现象减少的目的,在此基础上能够更好的服务于城市虚拟交通平台的建设。The invention discloses a planning method for the optimal travel plan of intelligent shared bicycles and public transportation, which provides travelers with the optimal travel plan by organically combining the travel of shared bicycles and public transportation, so as to achieve more efficient sharing of bicycles. Good service for public transportation, and can make the combination of different urban transportation modes more closely, which is conducive to the purpose of reducing the phenomenon of urban travel faults. On this basis, it can better serve the construction of urban virtual transportation platforms.
为解决上述问题,本发明提供的技术方案是这样的:一种智能化共享单车与公共交通最佳出行方案的规划方法,包括以下步骤:In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the technical solution provided by the present invention is as follows: a planning method for the optimal travel plan of intelligent shared bicycles and public transportation, comprising the following steps:
A)使用用户在移动端共享单车App上申请最佳出行方案推荐,向系统发出申请需求;A) The user applies for the recommendation of the best travel plan on the mobile shared bicycle app, and sends an application request to the system;
B)系统在接收到使用用户的最佳出行方案规划申请的消息后,使用者在移动端输入出行的目的地,系统接收,对使用者的定位坐标与出行目的地的定位分析,给出多种出行方案的最佳出行路线;B) After the system receives the user's best travel plan planning application message, the user enters the travel destination on the mobile terminal, the system receives it, analyzes the user's positioning coordinates and travel destination, and gives multiple The best travel route for a travel plan;
C)在系统自动分析多种出行方案的最佳出行路线后,根据出行成本与出行时间,出行费用和出行方式所确定的出行成本函数计算每种出行方案最佳出行路线的出行成本;C) After the system automatically analyzes the optimal travel route of multiple travel schemes, calculate the travel cost of the optimal travel route of each travel scheme according to the travel cost function determined by travel cost and travel time, travel cost and travel mode;
D)系统对不同出行方案的出行成本进行比选,将分析得到的出行成本最小的出行方案的最佳出行路线作为最佳出行方案;D) The system compares and selects the travel costs of different travel plans, and takes the best travel route of the travel plan with the smallest travel cost obtained from the analysis as the best travel plan;
E)系统将分析得到的最佳出行方案发送给使用者的移动端App上,供出行使用者参考。E) The system sends the analyzed optimal travel plan to the user's mobile app for reference by the travel user.
本发明进一步改进,步骤A)具体包括以下步骤:The present invention is further improved, and step A) specifically includes the following steps:
(A1)使用者在移动端打开共享单车应用软件,系统根据使用者坐标位置显示出用户周边500米范围内共享单车聚集地点,并弹出对话窗口“是否使用推荐出行方案”;(A1) The user opens the shared bicycle application software on the mobile terminal, and the system displays the gathering places of shared bicycles within 500 meters around the user according to the user's coordinate position, and pops up a dialogue window "whether to use the recommended travel plan";
(A2)用户选择确定,向系统提出出行方案规划申请;(A2) The user chooses to confirm, and submits an application for travel plan planning to the system;
本发明进一步改进,步骤B)具体包括以下步骤:The present invention is further improved, and step B) specifically includes the following steps:
B1)系统在接收到使用用户的出行方案规划申请的消息后,弹出对话窗口“请输入您的出行目的地”,使用用户可在移动端App中直接输入出行目的地,也可在移动端App中的自带地图中直接选择具体出行目的地在地图位置;B1) After the system receives the message of the user's travel plan planning application, a dialog window "Please enter your travel destination" pops up. The user can directly enter the travel destination in the mobile app, or enter the travel destination in the mobile app. Directly select the specific travel destination in the map location in the built-in map;
B2)系统在接收到使用用户的出行目的地信息后,对使用者的定位坐标与出行目的地的定位分析,给出14种出行方案的最佳出行路线,具体包括步行出行方案、共享单车出行方案、步行+常规公交组合出行方案、共享单车+常规公交组合出行方案、步行+地铁组合出行方案、共享单车+地铁组合出行方案、步行+常规公交+共享单车组合出行方案、共享单车+常规公交+步行组合出行方案、步行+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案、共享单车+地铁+步行组合出行方案、步行+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案、共享单车+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案、步行+常规公交+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案以及共享单车+常规公交+地铁+步行组合出行方案的最佳出行路线。B2) After receiving the user's travel destination information, the system analyzes the user's positioning coordinates and travel destination, and gives the best travel routes for 14 travel plans, including walking travel plans and shared bicycle travel. Combination travel plan of walking + regular bus, combined travel plan of shared bicycle + regular bus, combined travel plan of walking + subway, combined travel plan of shared bicycle + subway, combined travel plan of walking + regular bus + shared bicycle, shared bicycle + regular bus +Walk combined travel plan, walk+subway+shared bicycle combined travel plan, shared bicycle+subway+walk combined travel plan, walk+conventional bus+subway combined travel plan, shared bicycle+conventional bus+subway combined travel plan, walk+conventional The best travel routes for the combined travel scheme of bus + subway + shared bicycle and the combined travel scheme of shared bicycle + regular bus + subway + walking.
其中,B2a)步行方式出行方案的最佳出行路线为从出行始发地到出行目的地之间的最短步行路线;Among them, B2a) the best travel route of the walking mode travel plan is the shortest walking route from the travel origin to the travel destination;
B2b)共享单车出行方案的最佳出行路线为从出行始发地到出行目的地之间的最短骑单车路线;B2b) The best travel route of the shared bicycle travel plan is the shortest cycling route from the travel origin to the travel destination;
B2c)步行+常规公交组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳步行路线与最佳常规公交路线的组合路线;B2c) The best travel route of the walking + conventional bus combination travel plan is the combined route of the best walking route and the best conventional bus route;
其中,所述的最佳步行路线为从出行始发地到距离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点的最短步行路线与离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点到出行目的地之间的最短步行路线的组合;最佳常规公交路线是从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的常规公交路线;Wherein, the best walking route is the shortest walking route from the travel origin to the nearest conventional bus stop from the travel origin and the shortest walking route from the nearest regular bus stop to the travel destination The combination of ; the best regular bus route is the regular bus route from the nearest regular bus stop to the trip origin to the nearest regular bus stop to the travel destination;
B2d)共享单车+常规公交组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳共享单车出行路线与最佳常规公交路线的组合路线;其中,最佳共享单车出行路线应为从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点和离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点到出行目的地之间的最短骑单车路线的组合;最佳常规公交路线是从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的常规公交路线;B2d) The optimal travel route of the shared bicycle + regular bus combination travel plan is the combined route of the best shared bicycle travel route and the best conventional bus route; among them, the best shared bicycle travel route should be from the origin of the trip to the departure point The combination of the shortest cycling route from the regular transit stop closest to the origin and the regular transit stop closest to the trip destination to the travel destination; the best regular transit route is from the regular transit stop closest to the trip origin to Regular bus routes between regular bus stops closest to travel destinations;
B2e)步行+地铁组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳步行路线与最佳地铁路线的组合路线;其中,最佳步行出行路线为从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点和离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短步行路线的组合;最佳地铁路线为离出行始发地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的地铁站点之间的地铁路线;B2e) The best travel route of the walking + subway combined travel plan is the combined route of the best walking route and the best subway route; among them, the best walking travel route is from the travel origin to the nearest subway station from the travel origin Combination with the shortest walking route from the nearest subway station to the travel destination; the best subway route is the subway route from the nearest subway station to the travel origin to the nearest subway station to the travel destination ;
B2f)共享单车+地铁组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳共享单车出行路线与最佳地铁路线的组合路线;其中,最佳共享单车出行路线为从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点和离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短骑单车路线的组合;最佳地铁路线为离出行始发地最近的站点以及离出行目的地最近的站点之间的地铁路线;B2f) The best travel route of the shared bicycle + subway combined travel plan is the combined route of the best shared bicycle travel route and the best subway route; among them, the best shared bicycle travel route is from the origin of the trip to the origin of the departure trip The combination of the nearest subway station and the shortest cycling route between the nearest subway station and the travel destination; the best subway route is between the station closest to the origin of the trip and the station closest to the destination the subway line;
B2g)步行+常规公交+共享单车组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳步行路线、最佳常规公交路线以及最佳共享单车路线的组合路线;B2g) The best travel route of the combined travel plan of walking + conventional bus + shared bicycle is the combined route of the best walking route, the best conventional bus route and the best shared bicycle route;
其中,最佳步行出行路线为从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点的最短步行路线;Among them, the best walking route is the shortest walking route from the origin of the trip to the nearest regular bus stop from the origin of the trip;
最佳常规公交路线是从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的常规公交路线;The best regular bus route is the regular bus route from the nearest regular bus stop to the trip origin to the nearest regular bus stop to the travel destination;
最佳共享单车路线是从离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点到出行目的地之间的最短骑单车路线。The best bike-sharing route is the shortest cycling route from the nearest regular bus stop to the travel destination.
B2h)共享单车+常规公交+步行组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳共享单车路线、最佳常规公交路线以及最佳步行路线的组合路线;B2h) The best travel route of the shared bicycle + conventional bus + walking combination travel plan is the combined route of the best shared bicycle route, the best conventional bus route and the best walking route;
其中,最佳共享单车路线是为从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点的最短骑单车路线;Among them, the best shared bicycle route is the shortest cycling route from the origin of the trip to the nearest regular bus stop from the origin of the trip;
最佳常规公交路线是从与距离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的公交路线;The best regular bus route is the bus route from the nearest regular bus stop to the trip origin to the nearest regular bus stop to the travel destination;
最佳步行路线是从离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点与出行目的地之间的最短步行路线。The best walking route is the shortest walking route from the nearest regular transit stop to the travel destination.
B2i)步行+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳步行路线、最佳地铁路线以及最佳共享单车路线的组合路线;B2i) The best travel route of the walking + subway + shared bicycle combined travel plan is the combined route of the best walking route, the best subway route and the best shared bicycle route;
其中,最佳步行路线是出行从始发地到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点之间的最短步行路线;Among them, the best walking route is the shortest walking route between the origin of the trip and the nearest subway station from the origin of the trip;
最佳地铁路线是离出行始发地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的地铁站点之间的地铁路线;The best subway route is the subway route between the subway station closest to the origin of the trip and the subway station closest to the destination;
最佳共享单车路线是离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短骑单车路线。The best shared bicycle route is the shortest bicycle route between the nearest subway station and the travel destination.
B2j)共享单车+地铁+步行组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳共享单车路线、最佳地铁路线以及最佳步行路线的组合路线;B2j) The best travel route of the shared bicycle + subway + walking combination travel plan is the combined route of the best shared bicycle route, the best subway route and the best walking route;
其中,最佳共享单车路线是从出行始发地到距离出行始发地最近的地铁站点之间的最短路线;Among them, the best shared bicycle route is the shortest route from the origin of the trip to the nearest subway station from the origin of the trip;
最佳地铁路线是距离出行始发地最近的地铁站点以及距离出行目的地最近的地铁站点之间的地铁路线;The optimal subway route is the subway route between the nearest subway station to the travel origin and the nearest subway station to the travel destination;
最佳步行路线是从离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短步行路线。The best walking route is the shortest walking route from the nearest subway station to the travel destination.
B2k)步行+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案的最佳出行路线为最佳步行路线、最佳常规公交路线以及最佳地铁路线的组合路线;B2k) The best travel route of the walking+conventional bus+subway combined travel plan is the combined route of the best walking route, the best conventional bus route and the best subway route;
其中,最佳步行路线是从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的公交或地铁站点之间的最短步行路线和与从离出行目的地最近的公交或地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短步行路线的组合;Among them, the best walking route is the shortest walking route from the origin of the trip to the bus or subway station closest to the origin of the trip, and the shortest walking route from the bus or subway station closest to the destination to the destination. combination of shortest walking routes;
最佳常规公交路线是从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点之间的公交路线,或离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的公交路线;The best regular bus route is the bus route from the nearest regular bus station to the trip origin to the nearest subway station, or the nearest subway station to the trip destination to the nearest regular station Bus routes between bus stops;
最佳地铁路线是离出行始发地最近的地铁站点到距离目的地最近的地铁站点之间的地铁路线;The optimal subway route is the subway route between the subway station closest to the origin of the trip and the nearest subway station to the destination;
B2l)共享单车+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案的最佳出行路线应为最佳共享单车路线、最佳常规公交路线以及最佳地铁路线的组合路线;B2l) The best travel route of the shared bicycle + conventional bus + subway combined travel plan should be the combined route of the best shared bicycle route, the best conventional bus route and the best subway route;
其中,最佳共享单车路线是从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的公交或地铁站点之间的最短骑单车路线和从离出行目的地最近的公交或地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短骑单车路线的组合;Among them, the best shared bicycle route is the shortest cycling route from the origin of the trip to the bus or subway station closest to the origin of the trip, and the shortest route between the bus or subway station closest to the destination of the trip and the destination of the trip The combination of the shortest cycling routes for ;
最佳常规公交路线是从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点之间的公交路线,或从离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的公交路线;The best regular bus route is the bus route from the nearest regular bus station to the trip origin to the nearest subway station, or from the nearest subway station to the trip destination to the nearest Bus routes between regular bus stops;
最佳地铁站点是离出行始发地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的地铁站点之间的地铁路线;The best subway station is the subway line between the subway station closest to the origin of the trip and the nearest subway station to the destination;
B2m)步行+常规公交+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案的最佳出行路线是最佳步行路线,最佳常规公交路线,最佳地铁路线以及最佳共享单车路线的组合出行路线;B2m) The best travel route of the combined travel plan of walking + conventional bus + subway + shared bicycle is the combined travel route of the best walking route, the best conventional bus route, the best subway route and the best shared bicycle route;
其中,最佳步行路线是从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的常规公交或地铁站点之间的最短步行路线;Among them, the best walking route is the shortest walking route from the travel origin to the nearest regular bus or subway station;
最佳常规公交路线是从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点之间的公交路线,或从离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的公交路线;The best regular bus route is the bus route from the nearest regular bus station to the trip origin to the nearest subway station, or from the nearest subway station to the trip destination to the nearest Bus routes between regular bus stops;
最佳地铁路线是离出行始发地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的地铁站点之间的地铁路线;The best subway route is the subway route between the subway station closest to the origin of the trip and the subway station closest to the destination;
最佳共享单车路线是从离目的地最近的公交或地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短骑单车路线。The best shared bicycle route is the shortest bicycle route from the nearest bus or subway station to the travel destination.
B2n)共享单车+常规公交+地铁+步行组合出行方案的最佳出行路线是最佳共享单车路线,最佳常规公交路线,最佳地铁路线以及最佳步行路线的组合出行路线;B2n) The best travel route of the combined travel plan of shared bicycle + conventional bus + subway + walking is the combined travel route of the best shared bicycle route, the best conventional bus route, the best subway route and the best walking route;
其中,最佳共享单车路线是从出行始发地到离出行始发地最近的常规公交或地铁站点之间的最短骑车路线;Among them, the best shared bicycle route is the shortest cycling route from the origin of the trip to the nearest regular bus or subway station;
最佳常规公交路线是从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点之间的公交路线,或从离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点之间的公交路线;The best regular bus route is the bus route from the nearest regular bus station to the trip origin to the nearest subway station, or from the nearest subway station to the trip destination to the nearest Bus routes between regular bus stops;
最佳地铁路线是离出行始发地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的地铁站点之间的地铁路线;The best subway route is the subway route between the subway station closest to the origin of the trip and the subway station closest to the destination;
最佳步行路线是从离出行目的地最近的公交或地铁站点到出行目的地之间的最短步行路线的组合。The best walking route is a combination of the shortest walking routes from the nearest bus or subway station to the travel destination.
其中,上述从某一地点到另一地点的公交路线(如从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点的公交路线,从离出行始发地最近的常规公交站点到离出行始发地最近的地铁站点的公交路线,或从离出行目的地最近的地铁站点到离出行目的地最近的常规公交站点的公交路线)参照现有的优化方法来确定,即公交阻抗大小来确定:Among them, the above-mentioned bus route from a certain place to another place (such as the bus route from the nearest regular bus station to the nearest regular bus station from the travel destination, from the nearest regular bus station to the trip origin The bus route from the bus station to the subway station closest to the origin of the trip, or the bus route from the subway station closest to the travel destination to the regular bus station closest to the travel destination) is determined by referring to the existing optimization method, namely The size of the bus impedance is determined by:
公交阻抗函数指标包含乘客在公共交通线路上出行的时间、费用和方便性三个指标,公交阻抗值由下式决定:The bus impedance function index includes three indicators: the time, cost and convenience of passengers traveling on public transport lines. The bus impedance value is determined by the following formula:
Ri=k1Xi+k2Yi+k3Zi R i =k 1 X i +k 2 Y i +k 3 Z i
式中,Ri是常规公交阻抗值,量纲是时间单位;Xi是时间阻抗,指乘客在车内外消耗的时间,包括路段上正常行驶时间,交叉口延误时间和换乘耗时;Yi是费用阻抗;Zi是心理阻抗,主要指乘客对步行换乘、换乘次数、拥挤程度等的忍受程度。k1,k2,k3是参数,其中k2量纲为min/yuan,时间阻抗由下式计算:In the formula, Ri is the conventional bus impedance value, and the dimension is the time unit; Xi is the time impedance, which refers to the time spent by passengers in and out of the bus, including the normal travel time on the road section, intersection delay time and transfer time; Yi is the cost Impedance; the word Zi is psychological impedance, which mainly refers to the passenger's tolerance to walking transfers, transfer times, and degree of congestion. k1, k2, k3 are parameters, where the dimension of k2 is min/yuan, and the time impedance is calculated by the following formula:
Xi=ωnTni+ωm∑Tmi+ωv∑Tvi+ωw∑Twi X i =ω n T ni +ω m ∑T mi +ω v ∑T vi +ω w ∑T wi
式中,Tni是起点站等待时间;∑Tmi是各路段时间阻抗值和,包括公交车在路段的行驶时间和交叉口延误时间;∑Tvi是公交所经各站点时间阻抗之和;∑Twi各次换乘时间阻抗之和;ω是时间权重。In the formula, Tni is the waiting time at the starting station; ∑T mi is the sum of the time impedance values of each road section, including the travel time of the bus on the road section and the delay time at the intersection; ∑T vi is the sum of the time impedance of each station passed by the bus; ∑ T wi is the sum of the time impedance of each transfer; ω is the time weight.
本发明进一步改进,步骤C)中,系统对对不同出行方案最佳出行路线的出行成本进行计算前,对用户出行距离进行判断,若用户的出行距离小于公众平均最大可接受步行距离时,系统只需对步行或者共享单车出行方案最佳出行路线的出门成本进行计算;若用户的出行距离大于公众平均最大可接受步行距离,小于公众平均最大可接受骑单车距离,系统只需对共享单车最佳出行路线的出门成本进行计算;若用户的出行距离大于公众平均最大可接受骑单车距离,系统对步行出行方案和共享单车出行方案以外的其他出行方案的最佳出行路线的出行成本进行计算。The present invention is further improved. In step C), the system judges the travel distance of the user before calculating the travel cost of the best travel route for different travel plans. If the travel distance of the user is less than the average maximum acceptable walking distance of the public, the system Only need to calculate the travel cost of the best travel route for walking or shared bicycles; The travel cost of the best travel route is calculated; if the user's travel distance is greater than the average maximum acceptable cycling distance of the public, the system calculates the travel cost of the best travel route for other travel plans other than the walking travel plan and the shared bicycle travel plan.
例如,假设公众平均最大可接受步行距离为Akm,那么当系统分析得到的出行距离小于A km时,一般会采用步行出行或共享单车出行,此时系统只需对步行或者共享单车出行方案的出门成本进行计算,省去计算其他出行方案的时间,大大提高系统分析效率。与此类似,假设公众平均最大可接受骑单车距离为B km,当系统分析得到的出行距离大于A km,小于Bkm时,系统只需共享单车出行方案的成本进行计算;当出行距离大于Bkm时,系统省去对单纯步行出行和单纯共享单车出行的计算,只计算其他出行方案的出行成本进行计算便可。For example, assuming that the average maximum acceptable walking distance of the public is A km, then when the travel distance obtained by the system analysis is less than A km, walking or shared bicycle travel is generally used. Calculate the cost, save the time of calculating other travel plans, and greatly improve the efficiency of system analysis. Similarly, assuming that the average maximum acceptable cycling distance of the public is B km, when the travel distance obtained by the system analysis is greater than A km and less than B km, the system only needs to calculate the cost of the shared bicycle travel plan; when the travel distance is greater than B km , the system omits the calculation of pure walking travel and pure shared bicycle travel, and only calculates the travel cost of other travel plans.
所述的出行成本函数为The travel cost function described is
其中,Costi代表第i种出行方案,m代表方案i中第m种出行方式,j代表出行成本的影响因素属性,Amj是第i种出行方案中第m种出行方式的第j种出行影响因素对应的影响系数,xmj是第i种出行方案中的第m种出行方式的第j种出行属性对应的因子数值。Among them, Cost i represents the i-th travel plan, m represents the m-th travel mode in plan i, j represents the attribute of the influencing factors of the travel cost, and A mj is the j-th travel of the m-th travel mode in the i-th travel plan The influence coefficient corresponding to the influencing factor, x mj is the factor value corresponding to the j-th travel attribute of the m-th travel mode in the i-th travel scheme.
其中,Amj、和xmj通过对居民大范围交通出行调查取得,高峰时段和非高峰时段对应的Amj、和xmj值不同。Among them, A mj and x mj are obtained through a large-scale traffic survey of residents, and the values of A mj and x mj corresponding to peak hours and non-peak hours are different.
Costi代表第i种出行方案,其中,设定i=1,Cost1表示步行出行方案,Cost2表示共享单车出行方案,Cost3表示步行+常规公交组合出行方案,Cost4表示共享单车+常规公交组合出行方案,Cost5表示步行+地铁组合出行方案,Cost6表示共享单车+地铁组合出行方案,Cost7表示步行+常规公交+共享单车组合出行方案,Cost8表示共享单车+常规公交+步行组合出行方案,Cost9表示步行+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案,Cost10表示共享单车+地铁+步行组合出行方案,Cost11表示步行+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案,Cost12表示共享单车+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案,Cost13表示步行+常规公交+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案,Cost14表示共享单车+常规公交+地铁+步行组合出行方案。Cost i represents the i-th travel plan, where i=1 is set, Cost 1 represents the walking travel plan, Cost 2 represents the shared bicycle travel plan, Cost 3 represents the combined travel plan of walking + conventional public transport, and Cost 4 represents the shared bicycle + conventional For the combined travel plan of public transport, Cost 5 means the combined travel plan of walking + subway, Cost 6 means the combined travel plan of shared bicycle + subway, Cost 7 means the combined travel plan of walking + conventional bus + shared bicycle, and Cost 8 means the combined travel plan of shared bicycle + regular bus + walking Combined travel plan, Cost 9 represents the combined travel plan of walking + subway + shared bicycle, Cost 10 represents the combined travel plan of shared bicycle + subway + walking, Cost 11 represents the combined travel plan of walking + conventional bus + subway, and Cost 12 represents the combined travel plan of shared bicycle + conventional For the combined travel plan of bus + subway, Cost 13 means the combined travel plan of walking + regular bus + subway + shared bicycle, and Cost 14 means the combined travel plan of shared bicycle + regular bus + subway + walking.
m代表方案i中第m种出行方式,其中,设定m=1,表示步行出行,m=2,表示共享单车出行,m=3,表示常规公交出行,m=4,表示地铁出行;m represents the mth travel mode in scheme i, where m=1 means walking travel, m=2 means shared bicycle travel, m=3 means regular bus travel, m=4 means subway travel;
j代表出行成本的影响因素,其中,设定j=1,表示出行所花费时间,j=2,表示出行费用,j=3表示出行方式;j represents the influencing factors of the travel cost, where j=1 is set to represent the time spent on travel, j=2 represents the travel cost, and j=3 represents the travel mode;
则步行方案的成本核算函数为Then the cost accounting function of the walking scheme is
Cost1=A11x11+A13x13 Cost 1 = A 11 x 11 + A 13 x 13
共享单车出行方案的成本核算函数为The cost calculation function of the shared bicycle travel scheme is
Cost2=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23 Cost 2 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23
共享单车出行方案的成本核算函数为The cost calculation function of the shared bicycle travel scheme is
Cost2=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23 Cost 2 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23
步行+常规公交组合出行方案的成本核算函数为The cost calculation function of the combined travel scheme of walking + regular public transport is
Cost3=A11x11+A13x13+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33 Cost 3 =A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33
共享单车+常规公交组合出行方案的成本核算函数为The cost calculation function of the combined travel scheme of shared bicycles and conventional public transport is
Cost4=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33 Cost 4 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33
步行+地铁组合出行方案的成本核算函数为:The cost calculation function of the walking + subway combined travel scheme is:
Cost5=A11x11+A13x13+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43 Cost 5 =A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43
共享单车+地铁组合出行方案的成本核算函数为:The cost calculation function of the shared bicycle + subway combined travel scheme is:
Cost6=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43 Cost 6 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43
步行+常规公交+共享单车组合出行方案的成本核算函数:The cost calculation function of the combined travel plan of walking + regular bus + shared bicycle:
Cost7=A11x11+A13x13+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33+A21x21+A22x22+A23x23 Cost 7 =A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33 +A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23
共享单车+常规公交+步行组合出行方案成本核算函数Cost calculation function of shared bicycle + conventional bus + walking combined travel plan
Cost8=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33+A11x11+A13x13 Cost 8 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33 +A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13
步行+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案成本核算函数Cost calculation function of combined travel scheme of walking + subway + shared bicycle
Cost9=A11x11+A13x13+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43+A21x21+A22x22+A23x23 Cost 9 =A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43 +A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23
共享单车+地铁+步行组合出行方案成本核算函数Cost calculation function of shared bicycle + subway + walking combination travel plan
Cost10=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43+A11x11+A13x13 Cost 10 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43 +A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13
步行+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案成本核算函数Cost calculation function of combined travel scheme of walking + conventional bus + subway
Cost11=A11x11+A13x13+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43 Cost 11 =A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43
共享单车+常规公交+地铁组合出行方案成本核算函数Cost calculation function of shared bicycle + conventional bus + subway combined travel plan
Cost12=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43 Cost 12 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43
步行+常规公交+地铁+共享单车组合出行方案成本核算函数Cost calculation function of the combined travel scheme of walking + regular bus + subway + shared bicycle
Cost13=A11x11+A13x13+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43+A21x21+A22x22+A23x23 Cost 13 =A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43 +A 21 x 21 + A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23
共享单车+常规公交+地铁+步行组合出行方案成本核算函数Cost calculation function of shared bicycle + conventional bus + subway + walking combination travel plan
Cost14=A21x21+A22x22+A23x23+A31x31+A32x32+A33x33+A41x41+A42x42+A43x43+A11x11+A13x13 Cost 14 =A 21 x 21 +A 22 x 22 +A 23 x 23 +A 31 x 31 +A 32 x 32 +A 33 x 33 +A 41 x 41 +A 42 x 42 +A 43 x 43 +A 11 x 11 +A 13 x 13
上述成本核算函数中,A11为步行出行花费时间影响系数,x11为步行出行花费时间;A13为步行出行方式影响系数,x13为步行出行,取值为1;因步行出行不产生出行费用,因此出行费用成本忽略不计,即A12=0,因此A12x12未在核算函数中表示出来。In the above cost calculation function, A 11 is the influence coefficient of walking travel time, x 11 is the time spent on walking travel; A 13 is the influence coefficient of walking travel mode, x 13 is walking travel, and the value is 1; no travel is generated due to walking travel Therefore, the cost of travel expenses is negligible, that is, A 12 =0, so A 12 x 12 is not represented in the calculation function.
A21为共享单车出行所花费时间影响系数,x21为共享单车出行所花费时间;A22为共享单车出行的出行费用影响系数,x22为共享单车出行的出行费用;A23为共享单车出行的影响系数,x23为共享单车出行,取值为1;A 21 is the influence coefficient of time spent on shared bicycle travel, x 21 is the time spent on shared bicycle travel; A 22 is the influence coefficient of travel cost on shared bicycle travel, x 22 is the travel cost of shared bicycle travel; A 23 is the travel cost of shared bicycle travel The influence coefficient of , x 23 is shared bicycle travel, the value is 1;
A31为公交出行所花费时间影响系数,x31为公交出行所花费时间;A32为公交出行的出行费用影响系数,x32为公交出行的出行费用;A33为公交出行的影响系数,x33为公交出行,取值为1;A 31 is the impact coefficient of time spent on bus travel, x 31 is the time spent on bus travel; A 32 is the impact coefficient of travel costs on bus travel, x 32 is the travel cost of bus travel; A 33 is the impact coefficient on bus travel, x 33 is bus travel, the value is 1;
A41为地铁出行所花费时间影响系数,x41为地铁出行所花费时间;A42为地铁出行的出行费用影响系数,x42为地铁出行的出行费用;A43为地铁出行的影响系数,x43为地铁出行,取值为1;A 41 is the influence coefficient of time spent on subway travel, x 41 is the time spent on subway travel; A 42 is the influence coefficient of travel cost on subway travel, and x 42 is the travel cost of subway travel; A 43 is the influence coefficient on subway travel, x 43 is subway travel, the value is 1;
出行成本核算时,Amj和xmj取值,根据对市居民大范围交通出行调查得出,其中,根据出行时间的不同(分为高峰期时间出行和非高峰时间出行),Amj和xmj取值是不同的。When calculating travel costs, the values of A mj and x mj are obtained from a large-scale traffic travel survey of urban residents. Among them, according to the difference in travel time (divided into peak time travel and off-peak time travel), A mj and x The value of mj is different.
本发明进一步改进,步骤(E)具体包括以下步骤::The present invention is further improved, and step (E) specifically includes the following steps:
(E1)使用出行者采用推荐的最佳出行方案,移动端基于自带的GPS系统开始为出行者导航,直至出行者到达目的地,最佳出行方案导航分析系统自动关闭;(E1) The traveler adopts the recommended best travel plan, and the mobile terminal starts to navigate for the traveler based on the built-in GPS system until the traveler reaches the destination, and the best travel plan navigation analysis system is automatically closed;
(E2)使用出行者放弃采用推荐的最佳出行方案,最佳出行方案导航出行系统关闭。(E2) The traveler gives up using the recommended best travel plan, and the best travel plan navigation travel system is turned off.
有益效果:通过将共享单车的出行与公共交通出行的有机组合的方式向出行者提供最优出行方案,从而达到共享单车更好的服务于公共交通的目的,并能够使城市不同交通方式层之间的结合更加紧密,有利于城市出行断层现象减少的目的,在此基础上能够更好的服务于城市虚拟交通平台的建设。Beneficial effects: Provide travelers with the optimal travel plan through the organic combination of shared bicycle travel and public transportation travel, so as to achieve the purpose of better serving public transportation by shared bicycles, and can make the city's different traffic modes layer The closer combination between them is beneficial to the purpose of reducing the phenomenon of urban travel faults, and on this basis, it can better serve the construction of the urban virtual traffic platform.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为本发明流程图;Fig. 1 is a flowchart of the present invention;
图2为不同出行方案出行成本分析比选流程图;Figure 2 is a flow chart of travel cost analysis and comparison for different travel plans;
图3为案例一的规划图;Figure 3 is the planning diagram of Case 1;
图4为案例二的规划图。Figure 4 is the planning diagram of Case 2.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合附图和具体实施方式,进一步阐明本发明。The present invention will be further explained below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
【实例】已知经过对某市居民大范围交通出行调查及出行心理分析得知,该市居民的最大可接受步行距离为1.5km,公众平均最大可接受骑车距离为3.5km;[Example] It is known that after a large-scale traffic travel survey and travel psychology analysis of residents in a certain city, the maximum acceptable walking distance for residents in this city is 1.5km, and the average maximum acceptable cycling distance for the public is 3.5km;
不同出行方式出行所花费的时间的影响系数分别为:步行:A11=6.5/(10min),共享单车:A21=3/(10min),常规公交:A31=1.2/(10min),地铁:A41=1.0/(10min);The influence coefficients of the time spent in different travel modes are: walking: A 11 = 6.5/(10min), shared bicycle: A 21 = 3/(10min), regular bus: A 31 = 1.2/(10min), subway : A 41 =1.0/(10min);
不同出行方式出行的平均运营速度分别为:高峰时段:步行V1=3.5km/h,共享单车V2=7km/h,常规公交V3=18km/h,地铁V4=35km/h;非高峰时段:步行V1=3.5km/h,共享单车V2=8km/h,常规公交V3=28km/h,地铁V4=35km/h;The average operating speeds of different travel modes are: peak hours: walking V 1 =3.5km/h, shared bicycle V 2 =7km/h, regular bus V 3 =18km/h, subway V 4 =35km/h; Peak hours: walking V 1 =3.5km/h, shared bicycle V 2 =8km/h, regular bus V 3 =28km/h, subway V 4 =35km/h;
不同出行方式出行的出行花费影响系数分别为:高峰时段:步行A21=0,共享单车A22=4,常规公交A32=1.2,地铁A42=1;非高峰时间段,步行A21=0,共享单车A22=3,公交A32=1.8,地铁A42=1.5。The travel cost influence coefficients of different travel modes are: peak hours: walking A 21 = 0, shared bicycles A 22 = 4, regular bus A 32 = 1.2, subway A 42 = 1; non-peak hours, walking A 21 = 0, shared bicycle A 22 =3, bus A 32 =1.8, subway A 42 =1.5.
不同出行方式出行的出行花费分别为:共享单车平均使用费用为0.5元每人次,即x22=0.5,常规公交均价1元每人次,即x32=0.5,地铁均价为0-3km内2元,3-5km内3元,5-10km内4元,超出10km但小于15km的部分,5元,超出15km的部分6元;即所乘地铁在0-3km内,x42=0.5,所乘地铁在3-5km内x42=3,所乘地铁在5-10km内,x42=4,所乘地铁在10-15,x42=0.5;The travel costs of different travel modes are as follows: the average cost of shared bicycles is 0.5 yuan per person, that is, x 22 = 0.5, the average price of conventional buses is 1 yuan per person, that is, x 32 = 0.5, and the average price of the subway is within 0-3km 2 yuan, 3 yuan within 3-5km, 4 yuan within 5-10km, 5 yuan for the part exceeding 10km but less than 15km, 6 yuan for the part exceeding 15km; that is, the subway is within 0-3km, x 42 = 0.5, The subway taken within 3-5km x 42 = 3, the subway taken within 5-10km, x 42 = 4, the subway taken within 10-15, x 42 = 0.5;
不同出行方式的影响系数分别为,高峰时段:步行A13=2,共享单车A23=2.5,常规公交A33=5,地铁A34=2.5;非高峰时段:步行A13=1.5,共享单车A23=1.5,常规公交A23=3,地铁A23=2.5;The influence coefficients of different travel modes are, peak hours: walking A 13 = 2, shared bicycle A 23 = 2.5, regular bus A 33 = 5, subway A 34 = 2.5; off-peak hours: walking A 13 = 1.5, shared bicycle A 23 =1.5, regular bus A 23 =3, subway A 23 =2.5;
结合一下具体案例使用基于GPS导航的共享单车软件内置系统进行最优出行方案规划推荐。Combined with a specific case, use the built-in system of shared bicycle software based on GPS navigation to plan and recommend the optimal travel plan.
(1)已知出行者使用共享单车内置GPS软件得到的出发点所在地以及目的地所在地理位置在移动端App如附图3所示,试分析内置系统的分析过程,并确定最优出行方案。(1) It is known that the starting point location and the destination location obtained by the traveler using the built-in GPS software of the shared bicycle are shown in the mobile App as shown in Figure 3. Try to analyze the analysis process of the built-in system and determine the optimal travel plan.
根据GPS导航,从出行始发地到出行目的地的最短距离是1.2km,小于该市市民的最大步行心理距离1.5km,因此系统默认采用步行或共享单车出行方式,而忽略其他方式及组合出行方式的方案。According to GPS navigation, the shortest distance from the travel origin to the travel destination is 1.2km, which is less than the maximum walking psychological distance of the city’s citizens, which is 1.5km. Therefore, the system defaults to walking or shared bicycle travel, ignoring other methods and combined travel scheme of the way.
系统单独对步行和共享单车的出行成本进行分析,因步行和共享单车出行具有灵活性,无需按照固定路线进行行驶,因此均可直接沿最短路线进行行驶,即最短路即为步行和共享单车出行的最佳出行路线,因此两者出行距离均为1.2km。The system separately analyzes the travel costs of walking and shared bicycles. Because of the flexibility of walking and shared bicycles, there is no need to follow a fixed route, so they can travel directly along the shortest route, that is, the shortest path is walking and shared bicycles. The best travel route, so the travel distance of both is 1.2km.
(a)若出行时间是高峰时段(a) If the travel time is peak hours
对于步行出行,其花费时间x11为:For walking trips, the time spent x 11 is:
则步行出行成本为:Then the walking cost is:
对于共享单车出行,其花费时间x21为:For shared bicycle travel, the time spent x 21 is:
则共享单车出行成本为:Then the cost of shared bicycle travel is:
因此,Cost2小于Cost1,即共享单车的出行成本小于步行出行成本,因此系统向使用者推荐共享单车的出行方案。Therefore, Cost 2 is smaller than Cost 1 , that is, the travel cost of shared bicycles is less than the cost of walking travel, so the system recommends the travel plan of shared bicycles to users.
(b)若出行时间是非高峰时段(b) If the travel time is off-peak hours
对于步行出行,其花费时间x11为:For walking trips, the time spent x 11 is:
则步行出行成本为:Then the walking cost is:
对于共享单车出行,其花费时间x21为:For shared bicycle travel, the time spent x 21 is:
则共享单车出行成本为:Then the cost of shared bicycle travel is:
因此,Cost2小于Cost1,即共享单车的出行成本小于步行出行成本,因此系统向使用者推荐共享单车的出行方案。Therefore, Cost 2 is smaller than Cost 1 , that is, the travel cost of shared bicycles is less than the cost of walking travel, so the system recommends the travel plan of shared bicycles to users.
(2)已知出行者在早上8:30(即高峰时段)时使用共享单车内置GPS软件得到的出发点所在地以及目的地所在地理位置在移动端App中如附图4所示,试分析内置系统的分析过程,并确定最优出行方案。(2) It is known that the starting point location and destination location obtained by the traveler using the built-in GPS software of the shared bicycle at 8:30 in the morning (that is, the rush hour) are shown in Figure 4 in the mobile app, try to analyze the built-in system analysis process and determine the optimal travel plan.
根据GPS导航,从出行始发地到出行目的地的最短距离是2.8km,大于步行出行的最佳心理距离1.5km,因此不考虑步行出行,离出行起点最近的常规公交站点距离为438m,距离最近的地铁站为1.2km,其中,常规公交出行路线长度为2.2km,地铁出行路线长度906米,地铁终到站距离出行终点630m,常规公交终到站540m,则系统分析如下:According to GPS navigation, the shortest distance from the origin of the trip to the destination is 2.8km, which is 1.5km greater than the optimal psychological distance for walking. The nearest subway station is 1.2km, of which, the length of the conventional bus travel route is 2.2km, the length of the subway travel route is 906 meters, the distance between the final station of the subway and the terminal of the trip is 630m, and the final station of the conventional bus is 540m. The system analysis is as follows:
(a)仅共享单车出行:(a) Shared bicycle trips only:
此时,仅使用共享单车的出行,其花费时间为:At this time, the travel time of only using shared bicycles is:
则该方案的出行成本为:Then the travel cost of this scheme is:
(b)步行+常规公交:(b) Walk + regular bus:
此时,使用该方案出行花费时间为:At this time, the travel time using this scheme is:
x3=x11+x31 x 3 =x 11 +x 31
其中,x11为步行花费时间,x31是常规公交出行花费时间:Among them, x 11 is the time spent on walking, and x 31 is the time spent on regular bus travel:
x11=x11a+x11b x 11 =x 11a +x 11b
其中,x11a是从初始点到最近常规公交站点花费的时间,x11b是常规公交终点站到出发目的地花费的时间。Among them, x 11a is the time spent from the initial point to the nearest regular bus stop, and x 11b is the time spent from the regular bus terminal to the departure destination.
x11=9.24+7.5=16.74minx 11 =9.24+7.5=16.74min
则,该方案的出行成本为:Then, the travel cost of this scheme is:
(c)共享单车+常规公交:(c) Shared bicycle + regular bus:
此时,使用该方案出行,其花费时间为:At this time, using this plan to travel, the time spent is:
x4=x21+x31 x 4 =x 21 +x 31
其中,x21为共享单车花费时间,x31是常规公交出行花费时间:Among them, x 21 is the time spent on shared bicycles, and x 31 is the time spent on regular bus travel:
x21=x21a+x21b x 21 =x 21a +x 21b
其中,x21a是从初始点到最近常规公交站点的花费时间,x21b是常规公交终点站到出发目的地的花费时间。Among them, x 21a is the time spent from the initial point to the nearest regular bus stop, and x 21b is the time spent from the regular bus terminal to the departure destination.
x21=3.78+4.62=8.4minx 21 =3.78+4.62=8.4min
则,该方案的出行成本为:Then, the travel cost of this scheme is:
(d)步行+地铁(d) walk + subway
此时,使用该方案出行,其花费时间为:At this time, using this plan to travel, the time spent is:
x5=x11+x41 x 5 =x 11 +x 41
其中,x11为步行花费时间,x41是地铁出行花费时间:Among them, x 11 is the time spent on walking, and x 41 is the time spent on subway travel:
则,该方案的出行成本为:Then, the travel cost of this scheme is:
(e)共享单车+地铁(e) Shared bicycle + subway
此时,使用该方案出行,其花费时间为:At this time, using this plan to travel, the time spent is:
x6=x21+x41 x 6 =x 21 +x 41
其中,x21为共享单车花费时间:Among them, x 21 is the time spent on shared bicycles:
x41是地铁出行花费时间,均与前述相同:x 41 is the subway travel time, which is the same as the above:
则,该方案的出行成本为:Then, the travel cost of this scheme is:
(f)步行+常规公交+共享单车(f) Walking + regular bus + shared bicycle
x7=x11+x31+x21 x 7 =x 11 +x 31 +x 21
其中,x11是步行花费时间,x31是常规公交花费时间,x21为共享单车花费时间。Among them, x 11 is the time spent on walking, x 31 is the time spent on regular public transportation, and x 21 is the time spent on shared bicycles.
同理,计算出该方案的出行成本为Similarly, the travel cost of this scheme is calculated as
(g)共享单车+常规公交+步行(g) Shared bicycle + conventional bus + walking
同理,计算出该方案的出行成本为Similarly, the travel cost of this scheme is calculated as
(h)步行+地铁+共享单车(h) walking + subway + shared bicycle
该方案的出行成本为The travel cost of this scheme is
(i)共享单车+地铁+步行(i) Shared bicycle + subway + walking
该方案的出行成本为The travel cost of this scheme is
则所有出行方案的成本如表1所示:Then the costs of all travel plans are shown in Table 1:
表1不同出行方案出行成本比较Table 1 Comparison of travel costs of different travel plans
综上,全程共享单车出行模式的成本最小,因此,系统向使用者推荐此出行方案。In summary, the cost of the whole journey shared bicycle travel mode is the smallest, therefore, the system recommends this travel plan to users.
应当指出,上述案例仅仅是为清楚地说明所作的举例,并非对实施方式的限定。对所属领域的普通技术人员来说,在上述说明的基础上还可以做出其他不同形式的变化或变动。这里无需也无法对所有的实施方式予以穷举。而由此所引伸出的显而易见的变化或变动仍处于本发明创造的保护范围之中。It should be pointed out that the above-mentioned cases are only examples for clearly explaining, and are not intended to limit the implementation. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other changes or changes in different forms can be made on the basis of the above description. It is not necessary and impossible to exhaustively list all the implementation manners here. And the obvious changes or changes derived therefrom are still within the scope of protection of the present invention.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810024673.9A CN108171385A (en) | 2018-01-10 | 2018-01-10 | A kind of intelligent shared bicycle and public transport are most preferably gone on a journey the planing method of scheme |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810024673.9A CN108171385A (en) | 2018-01-10 | 2018-01-10 | A kind of intelligent shared bicycle and public transport are most preferably gone on a journey the planing method of scheme |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108171385A true CN108171385A (en) | 2018-06-15 |
Family
ID=62518107
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810024673.9A Pending CN108171385A (en) | 2018-01-10 | 2018-01-10 | A kind of intelligent shared bicycle and public transport are most preferably gone on a journey the planing method of scheme |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108171385A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109612488A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-04-12 | 东北大学 | A hybrid travel mode route planning system and method based on big data microservices |
| CN109855644A (en) * | 2019-03-12 | 2019-06-07 | 东莞市美誉信息科技有限公司 | Shared vehicle information guidance method and system based on downtown streets intelligence media |
| CN113551683A (en) * | 2021-07-21 | 2021-10-26 | 上海连尚网络科技有限公司 | Method, apparatus, medium, and program product for generating route information |
| CN115565128A (en) * | 2022-09-23 | 2023-01-03 | 西南交通大学 | A Smart City Governance System |
| CN116127205A (en) * | 2022-11-23 | 2023-05-16 | 东南大学 | Public transport system multi-network fusion comprehensive impedance determination method based on open data |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104864879A (en) * | 2014-02-25 | 2015-08-26 | 高德软件有限公司 | Navigation path planning method and device |
| CN105021185A (en) * | 2015-07-15 | 2015-11-04 | 上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司 | Navigation method and system |
| CN106949899A (en) * | 2017-03-15 | 2017-07-14 | 上海理工大学 | A kind of bicycle transfer public transport combined type Route Generation device and route generation method |
-
2018
- 2018-01-10 CN CN201810024673.9A patent/CN108171385A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104864879A (en) * | 2014-02-25 | 2015-08-26 | 高德软件有限公司 | Navigation path planning method and device |
| CN105021185A (en) * | 2015-07-15 | 2015-11-04 | 上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司 | Navigation method and system |
| CN106949899A (en) * | 2017-03-15 | 2017-07-14 | 上海理工大学 | A kind of bicycle transfer public transport combined type Route Generation device and route generation method |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109612488A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-04-12 | 东北大学 | A hybrid travel mode route planning system and method based on big data microservices |
| CN109612488B (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2022-09-20 | 东北大学 | Big data micro-service-based mixed travel mode path planning system and method |
| CN109855644A (en) * | 2019-03-12 | 2019-06-07 | 东莞市美誉信息科技有限公司 | Shared vehicle information guidance method and system based on downtown streets intelligence media |
| CN113551683A (en) * | 2021-07-21 | 2021-10-26 | 上海连尚网络科技有限公司 | Method, apparatus, medium, and program product for generating route information |
| CN115565128A (en) * | 2022-09-23 | 2023-01-03 | 西南交通大学 | A Smart City Governance System |
| CN116127205A (en) * | 2022-11-23 | 2023-05-16 | 东南大学 | Public transport system multi-network fusion comprehensive impedance determination method based on open data |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10976170B2 (en) | Electric vehicle routing system | |
| CN108171385A (en) | A kind of intelligent shared bicycle and public transport are most preferably gone on a journey the planing method of scheme | |
| CN105865472B (en) | A Vehicle Navigation Method Based on Optimal Fuel Consumption | |
| CN106682812B (en) | Comprehensive system of transport passenger traffic Modal split rate-apart from transfer curve determines method | |
| CN111798039B (en) | Student pick-up auxiliary system | |
| CN107798867B (en) | An equalization method for congested traffic network based on mixed traffic flow of electric vehicles and diesel locomotives | |
| CN104460583B (en) | A kind of electric automobile and user interaction system | |
| CN113724495B (en) | A traffic forecasting method for urban shared travel | |
| CN106651728B (en) | A kind of definite method of comprehensive system of transport passenger traffic mode advantage haul distance | |
| CN107085620A (en) | A method and system for inquiring about connecting travel routes between taxis and subways | |
| CN102637359A (en) | Taxi sharing cluster optimization system based on complex road network and optimization method thereof | |
| CN104680829B (en) | Bus arrival time prediction system and method based on multi-user cooperation | |
| CN113160600B (en) | Vehicle scheduling method for urban microcirculation public transportation system | |
| CN106979788A (en) | The paths planning method and navigation equipment of a kind of electric energy vehicle | |
| CN105844362A (en) | Urban traffic comprehensive travel decision-making model | |
| CN103034906A (en) | Multiplex mode traffic intermodal system based on cloud computing | |
| CN111833153B (en) | Method for recommending flights during purchasing high-speed rail tickets | |
| CN106530680A (en) | Combined service method of bus routes based on express buses | |
| CN118735194A (en) | An integrated matching method for shared autonomous vehicles and rail transit transfers considering carpooling | |
| CN108537362B (en) | Bus transfer method based on bidirectional search and estimation function pruning mode | |
| CN111127076A (en) | A pricing method under taxi sharing model | |
| CN105806355A (en) | Green vehicle path navigation system and method | |
| CN105528890B (en) | A kind of taxi sharing method suitable at Large-sized Communication hinge | |
| CN109584546B (en) | A Determining Method for the Departure Flow Threshold of Express-Conventional Bus Shared Lanes | |
| CN109086915B (en) | A GIS-based method for online car-hailing orders and route planning |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180615 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |