CN105678387A - Pipeline cleaning safety assessment method for natural gas pipeline crossing structure - Google Patents
Pipeline cleaning safety assessment method for natural gas pipeline crossing structure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105678387A CN105678387A CN201610003263.7A CN201610003263A CN105678387A CN 105678387 A CN105678387 A CN 105678387A CN 201610003263 A CN201610003263 A CN 201610003263A CN 105678387 A CN105678387 A CN 105678387A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- pigging
- displacement
- check
- natural gas
- pipeline
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 110
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 55
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title abstract description 23
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 70
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 241000124815 Barbus barbus Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005514 two-phase flow Effects 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Pipeline Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明属于天然气输送管道的设计与安全保障领域,尤其涉及一种天然气管道跨越结构的清管安全评价方法。The invention belongs to the field of design and safety assurance of natural gas pipelines, and in particular relates to a pigging safety evaluation method for spanning structures of natural gas pipelines.
背景技术Background technique
管道跨越结构是一种将输送管道从天然或人工障碍物上部架空通过的建设工程,我国自上世纪七十年代起开始修建天然气管道跨越结构,至今已有超过30座在役大中型管道跨越结构。天然气管道在新建投产后和正常的运行周期中,都需要进行清管以去除管内杂物和积水,保证其输送能力。然而对于天然气管道跨越结构,其清管时的动态载荷却可能造成极为严重的后果和损失。因为跨越结构的主要承力部件为钢制缆索,对管道属于柔性约束。而清管过程中,清管器推动管内积水形成的局部段塞流,在经过跨越结构上桥时的弯头和起伏地形时,还会发生流态变化,极易使跨越结构产生振动和位移;而管道振动又会影响管内两相流的流动状态,形成两相流条件下的流固耦合振动,进一步加剧跨越结构的振动和位移。例如四川南广河斜拉索管道跨越结构在清管时,管道的最大位移就达到了2m。大幅的位移和振动不仅会造成跨越结构的失稳,还易使其应力超限,从而导致整体结构的破坏。破坏后泄漏的天然气,可能引发火灾和燃爆事故,严重威胁跨越结构周边居民的生命和财产安全。因此,在跨越结构实施清管之前,对清管预案进行安全评估,对于保障跨越结构安全性和清管过程的稳定性是极为必要的。The pipeline spanning structure is a construction project in which the transmission pipeline passes through the upper part of natural or artificial obstacles. my country has started to build natural gas pipeline spanning structures since the 1970s, and there are more than 30 large and medium-sized pipeline spanning structures in service so far. . After the natural gas pipeline is newly built and put into operation and during the normal operation cycle, it needs to be pigged to remove debris and accumulated water in the pipeline to ensure its transmission capacity. However, for natural gas pipeline spanning structures, the dynamic load during pigging may cause extremely serious consequences and losses. Because the main load-bearing parts of the spanning structure are steel cables, it is a flexible constraint on the pipeline. During the pigging process, the local slug flow formed by the pig pushing the accumulated water in the pipe will also change the flow state when passing through the bends and undulating terrain of the upper bridge of the spanning structure, which will easily cause the spanning structure to vibrate and Displacement; and pipeline vibration will affect the flow state of the two-phase flow in the pipeline, forming fluid-solid coupling vibration under the condition of two-phase flow, which will further aggravate the vibration and displacement of the spanning structure. For example, when the spanning structure of the cable-stayed pipeline in Nanguang River, Sichuan Province was pigged, the maximum displacement of the pipeline reached 2m. Substantial displacement and vibration will not only cause the instability of the spanning structure, but also easily cause its stress to exceed the limit, which will lead to the destruction of the overall structure. The leaked natural gas after the destruction may cause fire and explosion accidents, seriously threatening the lives and property safety of residents around the spanning structure. Therefore, it is extremely necessary to conduct a safety assessment of the pigging plan before pigging across the structure to ensure the safety of the spanning structure and the stability of the pigging process.
国内外诸多学者都对清管过程中天然气管道跨越结构的位移和应力计算方法进行了研究,然而并没有形成完整的清管安全评价流程。而天然气管道跨越结构的相关标准,GB50459-2009《油气输送管道跨越工程设计规范》中仅规定了跨越结构在所有承力条件下的许用应力和许用位移,并没有针对清管过程提出专门的安全校核指标和校核流程,也难以对跨越结构的清管安全性进行评估。Many scholars at home and abroad have studied the displacement and stress calculation methods of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline during the pigging process, but a complete pigging safety evaluation process has not been formed. As for the relevant standards for spanning structures of natural gas pipelines, GB50459-2009 "Code for Design of Crossing Projects for Oil and Gas Transmission Pipelines" only stipulates the allowable stress and allowable displacement of spanning structures under all load-bearing conditions, and does not propose special requirements for the pigging process. It is also difficult to evaluate the pigging safety across structures.
综上所述,天然气管道跨越结构在清管过程中的大位移和强振动是其面临的重大安全威胁。然而目前,尚没有形成对天然气管道跨越结构清管过程安全性的评价方法和评价流程,在管道的生产运行中存在缺陷。To sum up, the large displacement and strong vibration of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline during the pigging process are major safety threats it faces. However, at present, there is no evaluation method and evaluation process for the safety of the pigging process of the natural gas pipeline spanning the structure, and there are defects in the production and operation of the pipeline.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明提供了一种天然气管道跨越结构的清管安全评价方法,以解决现有技术中的各种缺陷和不足,本发明采取的技术方案如下:提供一种天然气管道跨越结构的清管安全评价方法,该方法包括以下步骤:The present invention provides a pigging safety evaluation method for a natural gas pipeline crossing structure to solve various defects and deficiencies in the prior art. The technical solution adopted by the present invention is as follows: Provide a pigging safety evaluation for a natural gas pipeline spanning structure method, the method includes the following steps:
步骤一,根据天然气管道跨越结构的设计资料、现场踏勘以及拟定的清管运行方案,收集天然气管道跨越结构的长度、管道用钢的屈服强度,并根据表1收集跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移和应力值;Step 1. According to the design data of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline, site survey and the proposed pigging operation plan, collect the length of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline and the yield strength of the steel used for the pipeline, and collect the spanning structure at different pigging speeds according to Table 1. displacement and stress values;
表1天然气管道跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移和应力值Table 1 Displacement and stress values of natural gas pipeline spanning structure at different pigging speeds
步骤二,根据收集到的基础参数,结合表2计算跨越结构的最大容许位移和最大许用应力,称为该管道跨越结构的位移及应力许用值;Step 2, according to the collected basic parameters, in combination with Table 2, calculate the maximum allowable displacement and maximum allowable stress of the spanning structure, which is called the displacement and stress allowable value of the spanning structure of the pipeline;
表2天然气管道跨越结构的最大容许位移和最大许用应力Table 2 The maximum allowable displacement and maximum allowable stress of the natural gas pipeline spanning structure
步骤三,对比跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移、应力及其许用值,整理形成天然气管道跨越结构清管安全校核表,并根据校核结果决定是否清管以及合理的清管速率,具体实现步骤为:Step 3: Comparing the displacement, stress and allowable value of the crossing structure at different pigging speeds, sorting out and forming the pigging safety checklist for the crossing structure of the natural gas pipeline, and deciding whether to pigge and a reasonable pigging rate based on the check results , the specific implementation steps are:
(1)将不同清管速度下的位移和应力值与许用值进行对比,如果位移值或应力值小于对比的许用值,则称为“安全状态”;如果位移值或应力值大于对比的许用值,则称为“超限状态”,将所有校核结果总结后形成表3;(1) Compare the displacement and stress values at different pigging speeds with the allowable value, if the displacement value or stress value is less than the comparative allowable value, it is called "safe state"; if the displacement value or stress value is greater than the comparison The allowable value is called "over limit state", and all the check results are summarized to form Table 3;
表3天然气管道跨越结构的安全状态校核表Table 3 Checklist of safety status of natural gas pipeline spanning structure
(2)如果在表3中,存在一个清管速度条件下,位移校核、许用强度校核以及极限许用强度校核都为“安全状态”,则称该跨越结构“通过清管安全校核,可以实施清管”;如果在表3中,存在一个清管速度使得位移校核和极限许用强度校核为“安全状态”,但是所有的清管速度下许用强度校核均为“超限状态”,则称该跨越结构“通过清管安全校核,但需谨慎的选择清管速度以保证跨越结构安全”;如果在表3中,所有的清管速度条件下,位移校核、许用强度校核以及极限许用强度校核都为“超限状态”,则称该跨越结构“未能通过清管安全校核,现有条件下不能实施清管”;(2) If in Table 3, under the condition of a pigging speed, the displacement check, the allowable strength check and the limit allowable strength check are all in the "safe state", then the spanning structure is said to be "safe by pigging". check, pigging can be implemented”; if in Table 3, there is a pigging speed that makes the displacement check and the limit allowable strength check a “safe state”, but the allowable strength checks at all pigging speeds are If the crossing structure is "out of limit", it is said that the crossing structure "passes the pigging safety check, but the pigging speed must be carefully selected to ensure the safety of the crossing structure"; if in Table 3, under all pigging speed conditions, the displacement If the check, allowable strength check, and limit allowable strength check are all "over limit", it is said that the spanning structure "failed to pass the pigging safety check, and pigging cannot be carried out under the existing conditions";
(3)如果跨越结构被判定为“通过清管安全校核,可以实施清管”,则可选择位移校核、许用强度校核以及极限许用强度校核都为“安全状态”的清管速度实施清管;如果跨越结构被判定为“通过清管安全校核,但需谨慎的选择清管速度以保证跨越结构安全”,则选择3m/s的清管速度实施清管。(3) If the spanning structure is judged as "passing the pigging safety check, pigging can be carried out", then the pigging can be selected in which the displacement check, allowable strength check and limit allowable strength check are all in a "safe state". The pigging speed shall be carried out at a certain speed; if the crossing structure is judged as "passing the pigging safety check, but the pigging speed must be carefully selected to ensure the safety of the crossing structure", a pigging speed of 3m/s shall be selected for pigging.
本发明提供的天然气管道跨越结构的清管安全评价方法,是基于天然气管道跨越结构的设计参数和清管方案,结合材料力学原理和跨越结构的安全校核标准,研究建立的管道跨越结构的安全清管评价流程新方法。评价流程简单,评价指标清晰,使用评价方法得到的最终结果,能够辅助决策是否对天然气管道跨越结构实施清管,并可确定合理的清管速率,为天然气管道跨越结构的清管安全提供了管治依据。The pigging safety evaluation method of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline provided by the present invention is based on the design parameters and the pigging scheme of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline, combined with the principles of material mechanics and the safety check standard of the spanning structure, and researches and establishes the safety of the spanning structure of the pipeline A new method for pigging evaluation process. The evaluation process is simple, the evaluation index is clear, and the final result obtained by using the evaluation method can assist in decision-making whether to implement pigging on the crossing structure of the natural gas pipeline, and can determine a reasonable pigging rate, which provides guidance for the pigging safety of the crossing structure of the natural gas pipeline. Governance basis.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1天然气管道跨越结构的清管安全评价方法流程图。Fig. 1 Flowchart of pigging safety assessment method for natural gas pipeline spanning structure.
具体实施方式detailed description
为了使本发明的目的、技术方案及优点更加清楚明白,以下结合实施例,对本发明进行进一步详细说明。应当理解,此处所描述的具体实施例仅仅用以解释本发明,并不用于限定本发明。In order to make the object, technical solution and advantages of the present invention more clear, the present invention will be further described in detail below in conjunction with the examples. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described here are only used to explain the present invention, not to limit the present invention.
本发明提供一种天然气管道跨越结构清管过程中最大位移和弯曲应力的计算方法,该方法包括以下步骤:The invention provides a method for calculating the maximum displacement and bending stress in the pigging process of a natural gas pipeline spanning a structure. The method includes the following steps:
步骤一,根据天然气管道跨越结构的设计资料、现场踏勘以及拟定的清管运行方案,收集天然气管道跨越结构的长度、管道用钢的屈服强度、跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移和应力值等基础数据;Step 1. According to the design data of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline, site survey and the proposed pigging operation plan, collect the length of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline, the yield strength of the steel for the pipeline, and the displacement and stress values of the spanning structure at different pigging speeds and other basic data;
步骤二,根据收集到的基础参数,计算跨越结构的最大容许位移和最大许用应力;Step 2, calculate the maximum allowable displacement and maximum allowable stress of the spanning structure according to the collected foundation parameters;
步骤三,对比跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移、应力及其许用值,整理形成天然气管道跨越结构清管安全校核表,并根据校核结果决定是否清管以及合理的清管速率。Step 3: Comparing the displacement, stress and allowable value of the crossing structure at different pigging speeds, sorting out and forming the pigging safety checklist for the crossing structure of the natural gas pipeline, and deciding whether to pigge and a reasonable pigging rate based on the check results .
在步骤一中,需要收集的基础参数包括天然气管道跨越结构的长度、管道用钢的屈服强度,并根据表1收集跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移和应力值;In step 1, the basic parameters that need to be collected include the length of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline and the yield strength of the steel used for the pipeline, and the displacement and stress values of the spanning structure at different pigging speeds are collected according to Table 1;
表1天然气管道跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移和应力值Table 1 Displacement and stress values of natural gas pipeline spanning structure at different pigging speeds
在步骤二中,根据收集到的基础参数,结合表2计算跨越结构的最大容许位移和最大许用应力,称为该管道跨越结构的位移及应力许用值;In step 2, calculate the maximum allowable displacement and maximum allowable stress of the spanning structure according to the collected basic parameters in combination with Table 2, which is called the allowable value of displacement and stress of the spanning structure of the pipeline;
表2天然气管道跨越结构的最大容许位移和最大许用应力Table 2 The maximum allowable displacement and maximum allowable stress of the natural gas pipeline spanning structure
在步骤三中,对比跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移、应力及其许用值,整理形成天然气管道跨越结构清管安全校核表,并根据校核结果决定是否清管以及合理的清管速率,具体实现步骤为:In step 3, compare the displacement, stress and allowable value of the spanning structure at different pigging speeds, sort out and form the pigging safety checklist for the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline, and decide whether to pig and a reasonable cleaning method according to the check results. Tube rate, the specific implementation steps are:
(1)将不同清管速度下的位移和应力值与许用值进行对比,如果位移值或应力值小于对比的许用值,则称为“安全状态”;如果位移值或应力值大于对比的许用值,则称为“超限状态”,将所有校核结果总结后形成表3;(1) Compare the displacement and stress values at different pigging speeds with the allowable value, if the displacement value or stress value is less than the comparative allowable value, it is called "safe state"; if the displacement value or stress value is greater than the comparison The allowable value is called "over limit state", and all the check results are summarized to form Table 3;
表3天然气管道跨越结构的安全状态校核表Table 3 Checklist of safety status of natural gas pipeline spanning structure
(2)如果在表3中,存在一个清管速度条件下,位移校核、许用强度校核以及极限许用强度校核都为“安全状态”,则称该跨越结构“通过清管安全校核,可以实施清管”;如果在表3中,存在一个清管速度使得位移校核和极限许用强度校核为“安全状态”,但是所有的清管速度下许用强度校核均为“超限状态”,则称该跨越结构“通过清管安全校核,但需谨慎的选择清管速度以保证跨越结构安全”;如果在表3中,所有的清管速度条件下,位移校核、许用强度校核以及极限许用强度校核都为“超限状态”,则称该跨越结构“未能通过清管安全校核,现有条件下不能实施清管”;(2) If in Table 3, under the condition of a pigging speed, the displacement check, the allowable strength check and the limit allowable strength check are all in the "safe state", then the spanning structure is said to be "safe by pigging". check, pigging can be implemented”; if in Table 3, there is a pigging speed that makes the displacement check and the limit allowable strength check a “safe state”, but the allowable strength checks at all pigging speeds are If the crossing structure is "out of limit", it is said that the crossing structure "passes the pigging safety check, but the pigging speed must be carefully selected to ensure the safety of the crossing structure"; if in Table 3, under all pigging speed conditions, the displacement If the check, allowable strength check, and limit allowable strength check are all "over limit", it is said that the spanning structure "failed to pass the pigging safety check, and pigging cannot be carried out under the existing conditions";
(3)如果跨越结构被判定为“通过清管安全校核,可以实施清管”,则可选择位移校核、许用强度校核以及极限许用强度校核都为“安全状态”的清管速度实施清管;如果跨越结构被判定为“通过清管安全校核,但需谨慎的选择清管速度以保证跨越结构安全”,则选择3m/s的清管速度实施清管。(3) If the spanning structure is judged as "passing the pigging safety check, pigging can be carried out", then the pigging can be selected in which the displacement check, allowable strength check and limit allowable strength check are all in a "safe state". The pigging speed shall be carried out at a certain speed; if the crossing structure is judged as "passing the pigging safety check, but the pigging speed must be carefully selected to ensure the safety of the crossing structure", a pigging speed of 3m/s shall be selected for pigging.
下面结合具体实例对本发明的应用原理作进一步描述。The application principle of the present invention will be further described below in conjunction with specific examples.
例1:一座天然气悬索跨越结构的长度为320m,其管道用钢的屈服强度为552MPa,试评价该跨越结构清管的安全性。Example 1: The length of a natural gas suspension cable spanning structure is 320m, and the yield strength of the pipeline steel is 552MPa. Try to evaluate the pigging safety of the spanning structure.
第一步:收集到的基础参数包括天然气管道跨越结构的跨长Lp=320m、管道用钢的屈服强度σ=552MPa,不同清管速度下的位移和应力值如表4所示。Step 1: The collected basic parameters include the span length L p of the natural gas pipeline spanning structure = 320m, the yield strength of the pipeline steel σ = 552MPa, and the displacement and stress values at different pigging speeds are shown in Table 4.
表4实例管道跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移和应力值Table 4 Displacement and stress values of the example pipeline spanning structure at different pigging speeds
第二步:根据收集到的基础参数,结合表5计算跨越结构的最大容许位移和最大许用应力,称为该管道跨越结构的位移及应力许用值。Step 2: Calculate the maximum allowable displacement and maximum allowable stress of the spanning structure based on the collected basic parameters in combination with Table 5, which is called the allowable value of displacement and stress of the spanning structure of the pipeline.
表5实例管道跨越结构的最大容许位移和最大许用应力Table 5 The maximum allowable displacement and maximum allowable stress of the spanning structure of the pipe in the example
第三步:对比跨越结构在不同清管速度下的位移、应力及其许用值,整理形成天然气管道跨越结构清管安全校核表,并根据校核结果决定是否清管以及合理的清管速率,具体实现步骤为:Step 3: Comparing the displacement, stress and allowable value of the spanning structure at different pigging speeds, sorting out and forming the pigging safety checklist of the spanning structure of the natural gas pipeline, and deciding whether to pigge and a reasonable pigging according to the check results The specific implementation steps are as follows:
(1)将不同清管速度下的位移和应力值与许用值进行对比,形成如表6所示的跨越结构安全状态校核表;(1) Compare the displacement and stress values at different pigging speeds with the allowable values to form a checklist for the safety state of the spanning structure as shown in Table 6;
表6实例管道跨越结构的安全状态校核表Table 6 The safety status check list of the pipeline spanning structure of the example
(2)根据表6,在所有清管速度下,位移校核和极限许用强度校核均为“安全状态”,但是许用强度校核均为“超限状态”,因此该跨越结构的安全评价结论为:通过清管安全校核,但需谨慎的选择清管速度以保证跨越结构安全;(2) According to Table 6, at all pigging speeds, the displacement check and the limit allowable strength check are both "safe state", but the allowable strength check is "over limit state", so the span structure The conclusion of the safety evaluation is: pass the pigging safety check, but the pigging speed needs to be carefully selected to ensure the safety of the crossing structure;
(3)基于安全评价结论,应选择3m/s的清管速度实施清管。(3) Based on the safety assessment conclusion, a pigging speed of 3m/s should be selected for pigging.
通过以上计算实例可以发现,本发明的评价流程简单,评价指标清晰,可以为天然气管道跨越结构的清管方案做决策。因此,本发明确有其必要性和实用性。From the above calculation example, it can be found that the evaluation process of the present invention is simple, the evaluation index is clear, and it can make a decision for the pigging scheme of the natural gas pipeline crossing structure. Therefore, the present invention clearly has its necessity and practicality.
以上所述仅为本发明的较佳实施例而已,并不用以限制本发明,凡在本发明的精神和原则之内所作的任何修改、等同替换和改进等,均应包含在本发明的保护范围之内。The above descriptions are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent replacements and improvements made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included in the protection of the present invention. within range.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610003263.7A CN105678387A (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2016-01-04 | Pipeline cleaning safety assessment method for natural gas pipeline crossing structure |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610003263.7A CN105678387A (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2016-01-04 | Pipeline cleaning safety assessment method for natural gas pipeline crossing structure |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN105678387A true CN105678387A (en) | 2016-06-15 |
Family
ID=56190388
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610003263.7A Pending CN105678387A (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2016-01-04 | Pipeline cleaning safety assessment method for natural gas pipeline crossing structure |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN105678387A (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110806191A (en) * | 2018-09-29 | 2020-02-18 | 北京科力华安地质灾害监测技术有限公司 | Circumferential weld defect pipeline safety evaluation method based on strain monitoring |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6070285A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 2000-06-06 | Shell E & P Technology Company | Pipe cleaning apparatus for oil or gas pipelines |
CN102156089A (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2011-08-17 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Buried pipeline internal corrosion evaluation method |
CN103810380A (en) * | 2014-01-26 | 2014-05-21 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | Submarine pipeline suspended span security level grading evaluation method and device |
-
2016
- 2016-01-04 CN CN201610003263.7A patent/CN105678387A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6070285A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 2000-06-06 | Shell E & P Technology Company | Pipe cleaning apparatus for oil or gas pipelines |
CN102156089A (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2011-08-17 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Buried pipeline internal corrosion evaluation method |
CN103810380A (en) * | 2014-01-26 | 2014-05-21 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | Submarine pipeline suspended span security level grading evaluation method and device |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
许萍: "《斜拉索管道跨越结构清管动力响应分析》", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库(工程科技Ⅰ辑)》 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110806191A (en) * | 2018-09-29 | 2020-02-18 | 北京科力华安地质灾害监测技术有限公司 | Circumferential weld defect pipeline safety evaluation method based on strain monitoring |
CN110806191B (en) * | 2018-09-29 | 2021-07-13 | 北京科力华安地质灾害监测技术有限公司 | Circumferential weld defect pipeline safety evaluation method based on strain monitoring |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104200319B (en) | Oil-gas Pipeline Construction data supervision method based on pipeline integrity administrative skill | |
CN104537574B (en) | Method for evaluating damage risk of petroleum and natural gas pipeline | |
CN106407545A (en) | Soft soil foundation ditch safety evaluation method based on fuzzy comprehensive judgment method | |
CN103810380B (en) | Submarine pipeline suspended span safe class classification evaluation method and device | |
CN105844423A (en) | Method for assessing immersed tunnel operation phase health state | |
CN108764641B (en) | Oil-gas pipeline body and welding seam defect risk evaluation method | |
CN112765805A (en) | Polyethylene buried pipe risk evaluation method | |
CN112036734A (en) | Tunnel main body structure health state evaluation and maintenance strategy determination method | |
CN113705609A (en) | Method and device for constructing risk judgment model of oil and gas pipeline | |
CN116011232A (en) | A Comprehensive Calculation Method for Seismic Resilience of Urban Water Supply Pipeline Network Considering Water Quality and Water Quantity Index | |
CN104992051A (en) | Method and system for risk level evaluation of fuel gas polyethylene pipeline | |
Wu et al. | Investigation of mechanical behavior of buried DN110 polyethylene pipe with a scratch defect under land subsidence | |
CN105678387A (en) | Pipeline cleaning safety assessment method for natural gas pipeline crossing structure | |
CN113504024B (en) | Safety evaluation method of polyethylene gas pipeline under ground impact of slump demolition by blasting | |
CN105354425A (en) | Displacement calculation method in pipeline cleaning process of natural gas pipeline suspension cable crossing structure | |
CN115829353B (en) | Urban underground pipe network space redundancy analysis method | |
Malppan et al. | Pipe burst risk assessment using transient analysis in surge 2000 | |
CN117217562B (en) | Structural safety evaluation method and system after tunnel water flooding-drainage | |
CN110782149A (en) | A method for evaluating the retrofitting sequence of water supply pipelines in old urban areas | |
CN105354386B (en) | A kind of displacement computational methods in natural gas line suspension cable Oil pipeline pigging process | |
CN110390452A (en) | Risk evaluation method of gas pipe network | |
CN116227910A (en) | Urban gas pipeline leakage risk assessment method | |
Hooda et al. | Suitability of hyperelastic material model for analysis of water distribution system | |
Lin et al. | Current status of inspection and repair of difficult drainage pipelines in China | |
CN111259556B (en) | Safety evaluation method based on shield tunnel segment joint opening amount |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20160615 |
|
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |