CA2318641A1 - Artificial cornea - Google Patents
Artificial cornea Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2318641A1 CA2318641A1 CA002318641A CA2318641A CA2318641A1 CA 2318641 A1 CA2318641 A1 CA 2318641A1 CA 002318641 A CA002318641 A CA 002318641A CA 2318641 A CA2318641 A CA 2318641A CA 2318641 A1 CA2318641 A1 CA 2318641A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- cornea
- cells
- membrane
- artificial
- bowman
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 210000004087 cornea Anatomy 0.000 title claims abstract description 242
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 186
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 67
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000002491 angiogenic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 210000005260 human cell Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 210000000981 epithelium Anatomy 0.000 claims description 42
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 42
- 210000004045 bowman membrane Anatomy 0.000 claims description 35
- 210000003038 endothelium Anatomy 0.000 claims description 28
- 210000002555 descemet membrane Anatomy 0.000 claims description 27
- 210000003786 sclera Anatomy 0.000 claims description 24
- 210000002889 endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 20
- 102000012422 Collagen Type I Human genes 0.000 claims description 13
- 108010022452 Collagen Type I Proteins 0.000 claims description 13
- SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glutaraldehyde Chemical compound O=CCCCC=O SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 229940124158 Protease/peptidase inhibitor Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000137 peptide hydrolase inhibitor Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004017 serum-free culture medium Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229940123457 Free radical scavenger Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002516 radical scavenger Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000003606 umbilical vein Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 abstract description 12
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 abstract description 11
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000010874 in vitro model Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000033115 angiogenesis Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000008733 trauma Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 68
- 210000002919 epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 39
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 description 32
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 description 32
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 description 32
- 239000012679 serum free medium Substances 0.000 description 27
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 26
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 25
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 24
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 23
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 22
- 210000001508 eye Anatomy 0.000 description 20
- 230000003511 endothelial effect Effects 0.000 description 19
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 19
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 19
- LPEPZBJOKDYZAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N flufenamic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1NC1=CC=CC(C(F)(F)F)=C1 LPEPZBJOKDYZAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 18
- 229960004369 flufenamic acid Drugs 0.000 description 18
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 18
- DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium laurylsulphate Chemical compound [Na+].CCCCCCCCCCCCOS([O-])(=O)=O DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 17
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 16
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 16
- 229920001223 polyethylene glycol Polymers 0.000 description 16
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 15
- 229920001287 Chondroitin sulfate Polymers 0.000 description 15
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000002202 Polyethylene glycol Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 15
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 13
- 230000029663 wound healing Effects 0.000 description 12
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 11
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 239000012091 fetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 10
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 108091006146 Channels Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 9
- 102000009123 Fibrin Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 108010073385 Fibrin Proteins 0.000 description 8
- BWGVNKXGVNDBDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fibrin monomer Chemical compound CNC(=O)CNC(=O)CN BWGVNKXGVNDBDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 206010052428 Wound Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 229950003499 fibrin Drugs 0.000 description 8
- CBXCPBUEXACCNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetraethylammonium Chemical compound CC[N+](CC)(CC)CC CBXCPBUEXACCNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 102000003974 Fibroblast growth factor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 108090000379 Fibroblast growth factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 7
- CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N Gentamicin Chemical compound O1[C@H](C(C)NC)CC[C@@H](N)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](NC)[C@@](C)(O)CO2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N 0.000 description 7
- 229930182566 Gentamicin Natural products 0.000 description 7
- 239000007995 HEPES buffer Substances 0.000 description 7
- 206010030113 Oedema Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 238000002679 ablation Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229960002518 gentamicin Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000002500 effect on skin Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000005081 epithelial layer Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229920000669 heparin Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229960000342 retinol acetate Drugs 0.000 description 6
- QGNJRVVDBSJHIZ-QHLGVNSISA-N retinyl acetate Chemical compound CC(=O)OC\C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C QGNJRVVDBSJHIZ-QHLGVNSISA-N 0.000 description 6
- 235000019173 retinyl acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 239000011770 retinyl acetate Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000003757 reverse transcription PCR Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000013517 stratification Methods 0.000 description 6
- 108010039627 Aprotinin Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 108010049003 Fibrinogen Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102000008946 Fibrinogen Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 102000016359 Fibronectins Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108010067306 Fibronectins Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 238000003917 TEM image Methods 0.000 description 5
- APKFDSVGJQXUKY-INPOYWNPSA-N amphotericin B Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@H]1/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](C)OC(=O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)C[C@](O)(C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(O)=O)O[C@H]2C1 APKFDSVGJQXUKY-INPOYWNPSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229960004405 aprotinin Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229940012952 fibrinogen Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 230000035876 healing Effects 0.000 description 5
- ZPNFWUPYTFPOJU-LPYSRVMUSA-N iniprol Chemical compound C([C@H]1C(=O)NCC(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@H]2CSSC[C@H]3C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@H](C(N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=4C=CC(O)=CC=4)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=4C=CC=CC=4)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=4C=CC(O)=CC=4)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CSSC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCCN)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=4C=CC=CC=4)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCCN)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC2=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCSC)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CSSC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC=2C=CC=CC=2)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]2N(CCC2)C(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N2[C@@H](CCC2)C(=O)N2[C@@H](CCC2)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)NCC(=O)N2[C@@H](CCC2)C(=O)N3)C(=O)NCC(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=2C=CC=CC=2)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N1)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)O)[C@@H](C)CC)=O)[C@@H](C)CC)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 ZPNFWUPYTFPOJU-LPYSRVMUSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000007794 irritation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 5
- LPMXVESGRSUGHW-HBYQJFLCSA-N ouabain Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1C[C@@]2(O)CC[C@H]3[C@@]4(O)CC[C@H](C=5COC(=O)C=5)[C@@]4(C)C[C@@H](O)[C@@H]3[C@@]2(CO)[C@H](O)C1 LPMXVESGRSUGHW-HBYQJFLCSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 5
- 210000002536 stromal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- LPMXVESGRSUGHW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acolongiflorosid K Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(C)OC1OC1CC2(O)CCC3C4(O)CCC(C=5COC(=O)C=5)C4(C)CC(O)C3C2(CO)C(O)C1 LPMXVESGRSUGHW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- APKFDSVGJQXUKY-KKGHZKTASA-N Amphotericin-B Natural products O[C@H]1[C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@H]1C=CC=CC=CC=CC=CC=CC=C[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](C)OC(=O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)C[C@](O)(C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(O)=O)O[C@H]2C1 APKFDSVGJQXUKY-KKGHZKTASA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229920002307 Dextran Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 108010010803 Gelatin Proteins 0.000 description 4
- DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycine Chemical compound NCC(O)=O DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 108010043121 Green Fluorescent Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000004144 Green Fluorescent Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Heparin Chemical compound OC1C(NC(=O)C)C(O)OC(COS(O)(=O)=O)C1OC1C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(O)C(OC2C(C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(OC3C(C(O)C(O)C(O3)C(O)=O)OS(O)(=O)=O)C(CO)O2)NS(O)(=O)=O)C(C(O)=O)O1 HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 101001050288 Homo sapiens Transcription factor Jun Proteins 0.000 description 4
- LPMXVESGRSUGHW-GHYGWZAOSA-N Ouabain Natural products O([C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](C)O1)[C@H]1C[C@@H](O)[C@@]2(CO)[C@@](O)(C1)CC[C@H]1[C@]3(O)[C@@](C)([C@H](C4=CC(=O)OC4)CC3)C[C@@H](O)[C@H]21 LPMXVESGRSUGHW-GHYGWZAOSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 102000016611 Proteoglycans Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010067787 Proteoglycans Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108010071563 Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000007568 Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 244000166550 Strophanthus gratus Species 0.000 description 4
- 102100023132 Transcription factor Jun Human genes 0.000 description 4
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N all-trans-retinol Chemical compound OC\C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229960003942 amphotericin b Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 229960000686 benzalkonium chloride Drugs 0.000 description 4
- CADWTSSKOVRVJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzyl(dimethyl)azanium;chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].C[NH+](C)CC1=CC=CC=C1 CADWTSSKOVRVJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 4
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000008273 gelatin Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 235000011852 gelatine desserts Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 102000006602 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108020004445 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 239000005090 green fluorescent protein Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229960002897 heparin Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229960003343 ouabain Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052711 selenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011669 selenium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 4
- VBEQCZHXXJYVRD-GACYYNSASA-N uroanthelone Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(O)=O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1NC=NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCSC)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(N)=O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)CC)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 VBEQCZHXXJYVRD-GACYYNSASA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 3
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 13-cis retinol Natural products OCC=C(C)C=CC=C(C)C=CC1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 231100000635 Draize test Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 102000009024 Epidermal Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 101800003838 Epidermal growth factor Proteins 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 3
- 108090001005 Interleukin-6 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000011782 Keratins Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010076876 Keratins Proteins 0.000 description 3
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108010073929 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000005789 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010019530 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940088710 antibiotic agent Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 210000004204 blood vessel Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012136 culture method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940116977 epidermal growth factor Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000004402 high myopia Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000099 in vitro assay Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000000554 iris Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000012402 patch clamp technique Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004626 scanning electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000037390 scarring Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004627 transmission electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000003556 vascular endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- HJCMDXDYPOUFDY-WHFBIAKZSA-N Ala-Gln Chemical compound C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H](C(O)=O)CCC(N)=O HJCMDXDYPOUFDY-WHFBIAKZSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000004506 Blood Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010017384 Blood Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920002567 Chondroitin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 102000000503 Collagen Type II Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010041390 Collagen Type II Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000001187 Collagen Type III Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010069502 Collagen Type III Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000029816 Collagenase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108060005980 Collagenase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 208000006069 Corneal Opacity Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 2
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108700039887 Essential Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000004471 Glycine Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000341655 Human papillomavirus type 16 Species 0.000 description 2
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 108010007622 LDL Lipoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000007330 LDL Lipoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710128836 Large T antigen Proteins 0.000 description 2
- BELBBZDIHDAJOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phenolsulfonephthalein Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=CC=C1C1(C=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C2=CC=CC=C2S(=O)(=O)O1 BELBBZDIHDAJOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- RJKFOVLPORLFTN-LEKSSAKUSA-N Progesterone Chemical compound C1CC2=CC(=O)CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]2[C@@H]1[C@@H]1CC[C@H](C(=O)C)[C@@]1(C)CC2 RJKFOVLPORLFTN-LEKSSAKUSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 102000019197 Superoxide Dismutase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010012715 Superoxide dismutase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010017842 Telomerase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108090000190 Thrombin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 2
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-BOOMUCAASA-N Vitamin A Natural products OC/C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(\C)/C=C/C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-BOOMUCAASA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006427 angiogenic response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003963 antioxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003078 antioxidant effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000006708 antioxidants Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 210000001742 aqueous humor Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 210000003050 axon Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002561 chemical irritant Substances 0.000 description 2
- DLGJWSVWTWEWBJ-HGGSSLSASA-N chondroitin Chemical compound CC(O)=N[C@@H]1[C@H](O)O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1OC1[C@H](O)[C@H](O)C=C(C(O)=O)O1 DLGJWSVWTWEWBJ-HGGSSLSASA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229960002424 collagenase Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 210000000399 corneal endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 231100000269 corneal opacity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 231100000478 corneal permeability Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 238000004132 cross linking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004748 cultured cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- JVXZRNYCRFIEGV-UHFFFAOYSA-M dilC18(3) dye Chemical compound [O-]Cl(=O)(=O)=O.CC1(C)C2=CC=CC=C2N(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)C1=CC=CC1=[N+](CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)C2=CC=CC=C2C1(C)C JVXZRNYCRFIEGV-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000010339 dilation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008753 endothelial function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000871 endothelium corneal Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004438 eyesight Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003328 fibroblastic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- ZFGMDIBRIDKWMY-PASTXAENSA-N heparin Chemical compound CC(O)=N[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](COS(O)(=O)=O)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](C(O)=O)O[C@@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]3[C@@H](OC(O)[C@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)[C@H]3O)C(O)=O)O[C@@H]2O)CS(O)(=O)=O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O ZFGMDIBRIDKWMY-PASTXAENSA-N 0.000 description 2
- JYGXADMDTFJGBT-VWUMJDOOSA-N hydrocortisone Chemical compound O=C1CC[C@]2(C)[C@H]3[C@@H](O)C[C@](C)([C@@](CC4)(O)C(=O)CO)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3CCC2=C1 JYGXADMDTFJGBT-VWUMJDOOSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002085 irritant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 231100000021 irritant Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 238000000608 laser ablation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003470 mitochondria Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000004264 monolayer culture Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000286 mucous membrane, eye irritation or corrosion testing Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000004379 myopia Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000001491 myopia Diseases 0.000 description 2
- PGSADBUBUOPOJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N neutral red Chemical compound Cl.C1=C(C)C(N)=CC2=NC3=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C3N=C21 PGSADBUBUOPOJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000003254 palate Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- KIDHWZJUCRJVML-UHFFFAOYSA-N putrescine Chemical compound NCCCCN KIDHWZJUCRJVML-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 208000014733 refractive error Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 210000003491 skin Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 150000003431 steroids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002435 tendon Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229960004072 thrombin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 241001430294 unidentified retrovirus Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000019155 vitamin A Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000011719 vitamin A Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940045997 vitamin a Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000001993 wax Substances 0.000 description 2
- WCDDVEOXEIYWFB-VXORFPGASA-N (2s,3s,4r,5r,6r)-3-[(2s,3r,5s,6r)-3-acetamido-5-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-4,5,6-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@@H]1C[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](C(O)=O)O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O WCDDVEOXEIYWFB-VXORFPGASA-N 0.000 description 1
- WEEMDRWIKYCTQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,6-dimethoxybenzenecarbothioamide Chemical compound COC1=CC=CC(OC)=C1C(N)=S WEEMDRWIKYCTQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BZTDTCNHAFUJOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-carboxyfluorescein Chemical compound C12=CC=C(O)C=C2OC2=CC(O)=CC=C2C11OC(=O)C2=CC=C(C(=O)O)C=C21 BZTDTCNHAFUJOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108091006112 ATPases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetaminophen Chemical compound CC(=O)NC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000057290 Adenosine Triphosphatases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000002260 Alkaline Phosphatase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004774 Alkaline Phosphatase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229930183010 Amphotericin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- QGGFZZLFKABGNL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Amphotericin A Natural products OC1C(N)C(O)C(C)OC1OC1C=CC=CC=CC=CCCC=CC=CC(C)C(O)C(C)C(C)OC(=O)CC(O)CC(O)CCC(O)C(O)CC(O)CC(O)(CC(O)C2C(O)=O)OC2C1 QGGFZZLFKABGNL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000007992 BES buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010077805 Bacterial Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 241000751025 Carpopeltis cornea Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000002177 Cataract Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108091005462 Cation channels Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010057248 Cell death Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001227713 Chiron Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001340526 Chrysoclista linneella Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000004266 Collagen Type IV Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010042086 Collagen Type IV Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000012432 Collagen Type V Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010022514 Collagen Type V Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000004971 Cross linker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920000045 Dermatan sulfate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- SHIBSTMRCDJXLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Digoxigenin Natural products C1CC(C2C(C3(C)CCC(O)CC3CC2)CC2O)(O)C2(C)C1C1=CC(=O)OC1 SHIBSTMRCDJXLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101150013359 E7 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000010834 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010037362 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229910052688 Gadolinium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 108060003393 Granulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000012981 Hank's balanced salt solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000209 Hexadimethrine bromide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 101001135086 Homo sapiens Leiomodin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000632261 Homo sapiens Semaphorin-3A Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100540311 Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000767631 Human papillomavirus type 16 Protein E7 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010020675 Hypermetropia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000004889 Interleukin-6 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010063738 Interleukins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000015696 Interleukins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920000288 Keratan sulfate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 102100025759 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 3 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010070918 Keratin-3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000019687 Lamb Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102100033519 Leiomodin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000000134 MTT assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000002 MTT assay Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000007757 Media 199 Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010092801 Midkine Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016776 Midkine Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920003171 Poly (ethylene oxide) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005700 Putrescine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010038997 Retroviral infections Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100027974 Semaphorin-3A Human genes 0.000 description 1
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004809 Teflon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920006362 Teflon® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 244000247617 Teramnus labialis var. labialis Species 0.000 description 1
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000013127 Vimentin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010065472 Vimentin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010047531 Visual acuity reduced Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010022164 acetyl-LDL Proteins 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012190 activator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960002648 alanylglutamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000011166 aliquoting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229940009444 amphotericin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940035676 analgesics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000730 antalgic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000692 anti-sense effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000002543 antimycotic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000009310 astigmatism Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052788 barium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N barium atom Chemical compound [Ba] DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002469 basement membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960001716 benzalkonium Drugs 0.000 description 1
- CYDRXTMLKJDRQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzododecinium Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCC[N+](C)(C)CC1=CC=CC=C1 CYDRXTMLKJDRQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001222 biopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- HOQPTLCRWVZIQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-H bis[[2-(5-hydroxy-4,7-dioxo-1,3,2$l^{2}-dioxaplumbepan-5-yl)acetyl]oxy]lead Chemical compound [Pb+2].[Pb+2].[Pb+2].[O-]C(=O)CC(O)(CC([O-])=O)C([O-])=O.[O-]C(=O)CC(O)(CC([O-])=O)C([O-])=O HOQPTLCRWVZIQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- 230000004397 blinking Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940098773 bovine serum albumin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000005252 bulbus oculi Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011148 calcium chloride Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001506 calcium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000389 calcium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011010 calcium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229940097217 cardiac glycoside Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002368 cardiac glycoside Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000845 cartilage Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004709 cell invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008614 cellular interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013043 chemical agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003711 chorioallantoic membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000762 chronic effect Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004624 confocal microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000795 conjunctiva Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000021921 corneal disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000004453 corneal transparency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003431 cross linking reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012228 culture supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002999 depolarising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010012601 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- QONQRTHLHBTMGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N digitoxigenin Natural products CC12CCC(C3(CCC(O)CC3CC3)C)C3C11OC1CC2C1=CC(=O)OC1 QONQRTHLHBTMGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SHIBSTMRCDJXLN-KCZCNTNESA-N digoxigenin Chemical compound C1([C@@H]2[C@@]3([C@@](CC2)(O)[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@]4(C)CC[C@H](O)C[C@H]4CC2)C[C@H]3O)C)=CC(=O)OC1 SHIBSTMRCDJXLN-KCZCNTNESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001873 dinitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000003255 drug test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007159 enucleation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003560 epithelium corneal Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000003797 essential amino acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020776 essential amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013604 expression vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002744 extracellular matrix Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000013213 extrapolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007684 eye toxicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000013373 fibrillar collagen Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108060002894 fibrillar collagen Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013100 final test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012909 foetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- UIWYJDYFSGRHKR-UHFFFAOYSA-N gadolinium atom Chemical compound [Gd] UIWYJDYFSGRHKR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N glutamine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000002308 glutamine derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052736 halogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002367 halogens Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229940106780 human fibrinogen Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940014041 hyaluronate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960000890 hydrocortisone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 201000006318 hyperopia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000004305 hyperopia Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000815 hypotonic solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003365 immunocytochemistry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002055 immunohistochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011532 immunohistochemical staining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003364 immunohistochemistry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007901 in situ hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940047122 interleukins Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003963 intermediate filament Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- KXCLCNHUUKTANI-RBIYJLQWSA-N keratan Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)C[C@@H](COS(O)(=O)=O)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@@H]2[C@H](O[C@@H](O[C@H]3[C@H]([C@@H](COS(O)(=O)=O)O[C@@H](O)[C@@H]3O)O)[C@H](NC(C)=O)[C@H]2O)COS(O)(=O)=O)O[C@H](COS(O)(=O)=O)[C@@H]1O KXCLCNHUUKTANI-RBIYJLQWSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000002510 keratinocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000860 keratorefractive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002430 laser surgery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013532 laser treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004962 mammalian cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000028161 membrane depolarization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- VAOCPAMSLUNLGC-UHFFFAOYSA-N metronidazole Chemical compound CC1=NC=C([N+]([O-])=O)N1CCO VAOCPAMSLUNLGC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000001000 micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004088 microvessel Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000926 neurological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006386 neutralization reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100001254 ocular irritant Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 231100000327 ocular toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108091008819 oncoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000027450 oncoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229940023490 ophthalmic product Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012014 optical coherence tomography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003463 organelle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000011164 ossification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001575 pathological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000144 pharmacologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960003531 phenolsulfonphthalein Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000035479 physiological effects, processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 description 1
- XWIJIXWOZCRYEL-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium;methanesulfonate Chemical compound [K+].CS([O-])(=O)=O XWIJIXWOZCRYEL-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960003387 progesterone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000186 progesterone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005297 pyrex Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229960003471 retinol Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000020944 retinol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011607 retinol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001423 scleral cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007790 scraping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002545 silicone oil Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229930002534 steroid glycoside Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000005127 stratified epithelium Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960002385 streptomycin sulfate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012090 tissue culture technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003325 tomography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000167 toxic agent Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000008791 toxic response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003440 toxic substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H tricalcium bis(phosphate) Chemical compound [Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003954 umbilical cord Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000701161 unidentified adenovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009790 vascular invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005048 vimentin Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004127 vitreous body Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007279 water homeostasis Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/38—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
- A61L27/3804—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by specific cells or progenitors thereof, e.g. fibroblasts, connective tissue cells, kidney cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/3604—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix characterised by the human or animal origin of the biological material, e.g. hair, fascia, fish scales, silk, shellac, pericardium, pleura, renal tissue, amniotic membrane, parenchymal tissue, fetal tissue, muscle tissue, fat tissue, enamel
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/3641—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix characterised by the site of application in the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/3683—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix subjected to a specific treatment prior to implantation, e.g. decellularising, demineralising, grinding, cellular disruption/non-collagenous protein removal, anti-calcification, crosslinking, supercritical fluid extraction, enzyme treatment
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/38—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
- A61L27/3804—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by specific cells or progenitors thereof, e.g. fibroblasts, connective tissue cells, kidney cells
- A61L27/3813—Epithelial cells, e.g. keratinocytes, urothelial cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/38—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
- A61L27/3839—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by the site of application in the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/38—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
- A61L27/3886—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells comprising two or more cell types
- A61L27/3891—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells comprising two or more cell types as distinct cell layers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/0618—Cells of the nervous system
- C12N5/0621—Eye cells, e.g. cornea, iris pigmented cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
- A61K35/12—Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L2430/00—Materials or treatment for tissue regeneration
- A61L2430/16—Materials or treatment for tissue regeneration for reconstruction of eye parts, e.g. intraocular lens, cornea
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2500/00—Specific components of cell culture medium
- C12N2500/05—Inorganic components
- C12N2500/10—Metals; Metal chelators
- C12N2500/20—Transition metals
- C12N2500/24—Iron; Fe chelators; Transferrin
- C12N2500/25—Insulin-transferrin; Insulin-transferrin-selenium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2500/00—Specific components of cell culture medium
- C12N2500/70—Undefined extracts
- C12N2500/80—Undefined extracts from animals
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2500/00—Specific components of cell culture medium
- C12N2500/90—Serum-free medium, which may still contain naturally-sourced components
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/10—Growth factors
- C12N2501/11—Epidermal growth factor [EGF]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/10—Growth factors
- C12N2501/115—Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/30—Hormones
- C12N2501/38—Hormones with nuclear receptors
- C12N2501/385—Hormones with nuclear receptors of the family of the retinoic acid recptor, e.g. RAR, RXR; Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [PPAR]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/30—Hormones
- C12N2501/38—Hormones with nuclear receptors
- C12N2501/39—Steroid hormones
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/30—Hormones
- C12N2501/38—Hormones with nuclear receptors
- C12N2501/39—Steroid hormones
- C12N2501/392—Sexual steroids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2502/00—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by
- C12N2502/28—Vascular endothelial cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2502/00—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by
- C12N2502/99—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by genetically modified cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2503/00—Use of cells in diagnostics
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2510/00—Genetically modified cells
- C12N2510/04—Immortalised cells
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Dermatology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides an in vitro avascular human corneal equivalent that comprises immortalized human cell lines. As these corneal equivalents are in vitro models, they are maintained in an incubator throughout the testing period, thereby eliminating the problems and expense associated with animal care. The corneal equivalent is preferably surrounded by a matrix in which angiogenesis (formation of capillary-like structures) can occur in vitro. This surrounding matrix has the potentioal to play the role of a pseudo-sclera, allowing the in vitro assessment of the cornea's angiogenic reaction to any substance or injury. Furthermore, the model is capable of being produced easily, is physiologically functional and can give predictable and quantifiable results when submitted to various drugs, chemicals and/or physical trauma. Modifications can be made, such as the use of primary donor cells instead of cell lines; and the physical and chemical treatments of the matrix material to make the constructs suitable for use in transplantation.
Description
ARTIFICIAL CORNEA
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention is in the field of tissue engineering and culture systems and is directed primarily towards reconstruction of in vitro cell-based models for use as animal alternatives in irritancy, toxicity and drug efficacy testing.
In particular, the invention relates to an artificial cornea.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Animal tests are used for screening new chemicals, drugs, finished products or their ingredients for potential ocular irritancy. The historic test that is still in widespread use is the Draize rabbit eye irritancy test. The Draize test was developed in 1944 and involves the introduction of 0.1 ml of a test substance into the lower conjunctival sac of albino rabbit eyes (Draize et a1. 1944). Responses of the cornea, conjunctiva and iris are graded using a numerical scoring system. The cornea is scored for opacity that is induced by irritants. The conjuctivum is scored for an angiogenic response (such as redness caused by blood vessel dilation) while the iris gives a neurological response (i.e., contraction or dilation). Of these, an indication of corneal clarity/opacity is the most relied upon indicator for irritancy. Although still regarded as the definitive test available, the Draize test suffers not only from strong resistance from the public, but also because the rabbit eye responds differently to various traumas than does the human eye.
Animal testing is also used in the development of ophthalmic drugs. Again, differential responses between animal models, such as rabbits and humans, are well documented for drugs ranging from analgesics for pain and antibiotics, to steroid and non-steroid preparations that modify wound-healing responses.
Enucleated whole eyeballs from rabbits and cattle have been tested as possible Draize alternatives. Among them are the Bovine Eye Assay which measures corneal opacity/permeability from Merck Sharp and Dome laboratories.
While enucleated rabbit and bovine eyes have shown a capacity to handle and identify severely irritating substances over a wide range of physical forms and solubilities, they are less sensitive for resolving responses to very mild and moderately irritating substances (Burton et a1. 1981; Gautheron et al.
1992). In addition, these are animal derived tissues and therefore have the same accuracy problems and difficulty with extrapolation to humans as the Draize test. Moreover, the very short term viability of these corneas (tests are done on the day of enucleation) will not allow for longer term screening of more chronic effects of the milder test substances.
Organ cultured human corneas can be used for testing.
Richard et al. (1991), Anderson et al. (1993) and Collin et al.
(1995) have successfully organ cultured freshly obtained whole human corneas, allowing for investigations to be carried out on whole corneas. However, organ cultured corneas have a finite lifespan. The longest time recorded is 21 days (Anderson et al. 1993). More importantly, the availability of donors is sporadic and donor corneas are too heterogeneous to be useful as a practical model for drug testing.
Other alternatives that have been developed include the EYTEX'1''' test from In Vitro International (formerly Ropak Laboratories) which is based on the quantification of opacity produced in a synthetic protein matrix on exposure to chemical irritants (Gordon, 1992); the Keratinocyte Neutral Red Uptake Bioassay from Clonetics Corporation based on the methodology of Borenfreund and Puerner (1985), the MTT assay using living skin equivalent from Advanced Tissue Sciences (Osborne et aI. 1995), and the Chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (Bagley et al., 1992). Trans-epithelial permeability assay can also be used as an in vitro assay for predicting ocular irritancy using MDCK
cells (Martin and Stott, 1992). Others use an agar diffusion cytolysis as an alternative screen for the prediction of a corrosive ocular response using rabbit cornea fibroblasts (Galer, 1992).
Results indicate that while it may not be possible to use a single test to classify compounds as to irritation potential, some of the alternative test models may be useful in prioritizing and reducing the number of in vivo irritation tests conducted. However, all of the tests are dependent upon continued rabbit eye testing as definitive tests and also to develop validation databases to aid interpretation of the in vi tro data .
Researchers have been attempting to reconstruct corneas in vitro from cell lines. Individual human corneal epithelial layers have been successfully maintained in culture as a stratified epithelium by Kahn et al. (1993) and Araki-Sasaki et al. (1995). These investigators had used corneal epithelial cell lines that were immortalized using a hybrid SV40-adenovirus. Successful reconstructions of corneas comprising the three main layers have also been recently reported by Minami et al. (1993) and Zieske et aI. (1994).
These corneas were reconstructed from either passaged primary cells from bovine (Minami et al. 1993), or mixed cultures of primary rabbit epithelial and stromal cells and an immortalized mouse endothelial cell line (Zieske et al. 1994).
To date, there have been no reports of successfully reconstructed human corneas based fully on human cell lines while mimicking the physiology of the human cornea and surrounding tissue.
Media used in preparing artificial corneas, or in culturing whole corneas, must be carefully selected to avoid detrimental effects to the desired process. Certain serum proteins will affect wound healing and hence a serum-free medium is desirable to allow optimal control of experimental conditions. Disclosed herein is a serum-free medium that may be used to prepare the cornea of the present invention, as well as for culturing whole corneas.
SU1~ARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an artificial mammalian cornea which comprises:
a) an endothelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) a stromal matrix;
c) an epithelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells; and d) at least one layer selected from Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane.
The present invention also provides a method for preparing an artif icial mammalian cornea which comprises:
a) growing an endothelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the endothelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the endothelium or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
15d) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an epithelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane is present.
The present invention further provides a method for preparing an artificial mammalian cornea which comprises:
25a) growing an epithelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the epithelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the epithelium or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
d) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an endothelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane is present.
The present invention also provides a commercial package which comprises:
a) the cornea as described herein, and 5 b) instructions for its use for testing a substance for ocular irritancy, toxicity or drug efficacy, or transplantation.
The present invention also provides a serum-free culture medium which comprises at least one of each of a protease inhibitor, a growth factor, a substance which mediates the growth factor and a free-radical scavenger, and preferably a substance which prevents cellular contraction, as well as instructions for use of the medium in culturing a cornea, preferably a human cornea, in vitro.
The present invention also provides an artificial sclera which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells.
Gene transfer and tissue culture techniques have been used to construct a cornea from immortalized human cell lines that is analogous to the human cornea in vivo. The corneal equivalent is preferentially surrounded by a sclera capable of mimicking inflammation responses.
Various different gene constructs have been introduced into the immortalized cell lines by transfection and/or retroviral infection to either overexpress, or block expression (antisense constructs) of, gene products in order to mimic different pathological conditions that occur in the cornea.
This allows the development of in vitro corneal disease models for studying drug treatment efficacy.
The model can also be modified to render it suitable for use in transplantation. Also described is a medium that can be used to start and maintain cultures of primary cells and cell lines from cornea and other tissues. The medium is also suitable for the culture of corneas, both artificial and natural, in the absence of serum.
The artificial cornea is preferably surrounded by a matrix in which angiogenesis (formation of capillary-like structures) can occur in vitro. The artificial cornea is physiologically and functionally similar to the human cornea and has the potential to respond to ocular irritants, drugs and injuries.
The surrounding angiogenic material plays the role of pseudo-sclera and thereby provides the ability to assess in vitro the angiogenic reaction to any chemical irritants, drugs or any injuries. The invention extends to a method for making the artificial cornea and a method for using the artificial cornea. Preferably, the corneal or scleral cells used, whether primary or immortalized, are of human origin.
The invention also provides a serum-free medium that has been used to successfully start and maintain the cell lines, as well as the artificial corneas. The medium may also be used in reconstruction of other body tissues that could be used as complementary in vitro models for alternative models to animal testing.
The artificial cornea can also be modified for transplantation by modification of the matrix compounds by physical and chemical treatments, and incorporation of matrix proteins or essential amino acid sequences and/or growth factors. Primary cells can be used until the safety of cells containing viral constructs for transplantation has been determined. In addition, cells from one or more layers may be omitted to allow for the host/patient's cells to repopulate the transplanted matrix material.
HRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention and its preferred embodiments may be better understood with reference to the following drawings.
Figure la and lb show methods of reconstruction of a cornea in vi tro.
Figure 2a shows one method used in reconstruction of the cornea and sclera in vitro.
Figure 2b shows another method of reconstructing the cornea and sclera in vi tro.
Figure 3 shows human cornea obtained from the Eye Bank and a cornea that was reconstructed from cell lines. Both were organs cultured in serum-free medium for one week.
Figure 4 shows sections through a reconstructed cornea compared with an organ-cultured human cornea. Both show well defined epithelial, stromal and endothelial layers. Descemet's membrane is present in both specimens. However, Bowman's layer is not prominent in either specimen as seen in other samples of organ cultured human corneas.
Figure 5 shows a section through a reconstructed human cornea visualized with epilfluorescence by confocalmicroscopy.
The epithelial and endothelial layers are distinct, and keratocytes are present in the collagenous stromal matrix.
Inset: H&E-stained section of the same cornea.
Figure 6 shows a cornea that was reconstructed with cell lines that were transformed. The three main layers are not readily distinguishable and the transformed epithelial cells are seen invading the stromal compartment. This sample demonstrates the importance of obtaining immortalized cell lines that are physiologically similar to low passage primary cells from the human cornea. Inset: H&E-stained section.
Figure 7 shows in situ hybridization, using a probe for alpha2(VIII) collagen, which is found in Descemet's membrane in the cornea and is known to be produced by corneal endothelial cells. Alpha2(VIII) mRNA is produced by this endothelial cell line, as shown by visualization of cell-bound alkaline phosphatase conjugated DIG-antisense riboprobe. The sense control-probe cells remain unlabelled.
Figure 8 shows an~epithelial cell line showing expression of a standard marker, cytokeratin by immunohistochemistry.
Figure 9 shows cytokeratin expression in the epithelium of a human cornea and in a reconstructed cornea.
Figure 10 shows a transmission electron micrograph of the epithelium of a reconstructed cornea after two weeks of culture at an air-liquid interface. Microplicae, a characteristic of corneal epithelial cells are present on the external surface and functional complexes have formed between cells (arrowheads).
Figure 11 shows a transmission electron micrograph of a reconstructed cornea after two weeks of culture at air-liquid interface, showing stromal keratocytes within a largely collagenous matrix. The nuclei (n) are electron lucent, and there are mitochondria (arrowheads) in the cytoplasm, indicating that the cells are healthy.
Figure 12 shows a transmission electron micrograph of the endothelial layer of a reconstructed cornea after two weeks of culture at air-liquid interface. Mitochondria are present' in the cytoplasm as indicated, and functional complexes (arrowheads) have formed between cells.
Figure 13 shows responses of reconstructed corneas to different aqueous test chemicals. Each cornea was exposed centrally to 100 ~1 of the test chemical for 10 min, after which the chemical was washed off with saline and the corneas were re-cultured for a further 3 days. The saline-treated cornea served as the control. Treatment with 10~ SDS and the dilute benzalkonium chloride solution caused wounds to the centre of the cornea as seen in changes of corneal transparency. The wound caused by the 0.01 benzalkonium chloride solution was able to heal but the SDS wound is still unhealed.
Figure 14 shows differences in responses of reconstructed corneas to SDS and 0.01 benzalkonium chloride solution, as visualised by live-dead staining. Live cells are green, while dying or dead cells are orange-red. A. Epithelial cells of dilute benzalkonium chloride treated cornea, showing some dead and dying cells but mostly live cells. B. SDS-treated construct, showing mostly dead and dying cells. C. Stromal cells of the benzalkonium solution-treated cornea are mostly alive, showing little/no penetration of solution into the stromal compartment. D. Stroma of SDS-treated cornea showing orange-red dead or dying cells, indicating penetration of the detergent into the stroma.
Figure 15 shows RT-PCR products showing expression of mRNA
for 8 genes that have been found to be related to corneal functioning, particularly in wound healing. Baseline levels in primary cultures of human corneal cells are compared with the immortalized cell lines that we have established. mRNAs for GAPDH (control housekeeping gene), Coll 1, c-fos, c-jun and bFGF are expressed equally in all the 8 types of cells. IL-la mRNA appears to be expressed at a higher level (or a similar level) in epithelial and stroma cell lines than in the primary cells. IL-6 mRNA may be expressed at a lower level in the endothelial cell line than in the primary endothelial cells.
1 = primary epithelium; 2 - primary stroma; 3 = primary endothelium; 4, 5 = immortalized epithelial lines;
6, 7 = immortalized stromal lines; 8 = immortalized endothelial line.
Figure 16 shows immortalized vascular endothelial cells in fibrin matrix after 7 days of cell culture in serum-free medium. A. In phase contrast, microvessels can be distinctively seen forming a network within the whole thickness of the matrix. Mag. 36x. B. On histological sections, capillary-like vessels can be observed. Mag. 90x.
Figure 17 shows reconstructed human cornea and sclera.
The angiogenic cells of the sclera have been labelled with a fluorescent marker, DiI-conjugated Low Density Lipoprotein (DiI-LDL). Inset: H&E-stained cornea and sclera. f, fibrin matrix with blood vessels; c, cornea. The cornea-sclera junction is indicated by the arrow.
Figure 18 shows higher magnification of the sclera showing Di-I-LDL labelled blood vessels.
Figure 19 is a diagram summarizing the organ culture protocol. A. View of culture dish assembly from the top.
B. View of culture dish assembly from the side. C. Corneas in culture at an air-liquid interface, created by the up and down cycles of the rocker.
Figure 20 shows human corneas cultured for 3 weeks.
A. Epithelium, showing uniformed stratified squamous epithelia (ep) of five layers. The underlying Bowman's membrane (*) is present. The stroma (s) shows no signs of edema. Bar, 60 ~,m. B. Endothelial layer (en) and Descemet's membrane (arrow) were also intact.
Figure 21 are TEM micrographs of the corneal epithelium after 2 weeks in culture. A. Cell showing an electron lucent nucleus (n). B. Cells also retained their functional complexes (arrowheads) and characteristic microplicae (m). Culture artifacts (*) were present but the ultrastructural observations 5 suggested that the cells were still healthy.
Figure 22 is a section through a cornea that was ablated to give a wound of 6 mm in diameter and about 190 ~.m deep (cornea thickness is 500 ~,m) after 10 days in organ culture.
The stroma (s) underlying the ablation in samples with such 10 deep wounds often develops edema (e). However, the epithelium (ep) has grown over the stroma and there is some re-stratification. Bar, 20 ~,m.
Figure 23 are electon micrographs. A. SEM of half a cornea that had been treated with the excimer laser in the central zone. High myopia treatment parameters of 6 mm, -12 D
(about 190 ~m deep) were used. Arrows indicate the treatment boundary. Bar, 2 mm. B. Epithelial cells in the treated central area. Bar, 100 Vim. C. Epithelium in the untreated peripheral area. Bar, 100 ~Cm.
Figure 24 shows wavelength dependence of transparency and non-specular reflection of excised and reconstructed corneas:
Transparency (A) and non-specular reflection (B) of excised animal corneas and reconstructed corneas as a function of wavelength.
Figure 25 shows dosage response of animal and reconstructed corneas: Reconstructed (A), rabbit (B) and porcine (C) corneas were exposed to different chemicals and for different exposure times. Transparency was measured with transparent light.
Figure 26 (a-j) shows relative intensities of RT-PCR bands for SDS-treated and untreated human artificial corneas. Band intensities for the indicated genes were quantitated by a phosphoimager and were divided by the intensity of the corresponding GAPDH band. Corneas were treated with 5~ SDS in medium for 1 or 3 minutes, then washed twice with medium.
Total RNA was extracted at 1 hour after the SDS treatment, and RT-PCR was carried out for specific primers for various genes.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention is in the field of tissue engineering and culture systems and is directed primarily towards reconstruction of in vitro cell-based models for use as animal alternatives in irritancy, toxicity and drug efficacy testing.
In particular, the invention relates to an artificial cornea.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Animal tests are used for screening new chemicals, drugs, finished products or their ingredients for potential ocular irritancy. The historic test that is still in widespread use is the Draize rabbit eye irritancy test. The Draize test was developed in 1944 and involves the introduction of 0.1 ml of a test substance into the lower conjunctival sac of albino rabbit eyes (Draize et a1. 1944). Responses of the cornea, conjunctiva and iris are graded using a numerical scoring system. The cornea is scored for opacity that is induced by irritants. The conjuctivum is scored for an angiogenic response (such as redness caused by blood vessel dilation) while the iris gives a neurological response (i.e., contraction or dilation). Of these, an indication of corneal clarity/opacity is the most relied upon indicator for irritancy. Although still regarded as the definitive test available, the Draize test suffers not only from strong resistance from the public, but also because the rabbit eye responds differently to various traumas than does the human eye.
Animal testing is also used in the development of ophthalmic drugs. Again, differential responses between animal models, such as rabbits and humans, are well documented for drugs ranging from analgesics for pain and antibiotics, to steroid and non-steroid preparations that modify wound-healing responses.
Enucleated whole eyeballs from rabbits and cattle have been tested as possible Draize alternatives. Among them are the Bovine Eye Assay which measures corneal opacity/permeability from Merck Sharp and Dome laboratories.
While enucleated rabbit and bovine eyes have shown a capacity to handle and identify severely irritating substances over a wide range of physical forms and solubilities, they are less sensitive for resolving responses to very mild and moderately irritating substances (Burton et a1. 1981; Gautheron et al.
1992). In addition, these are animal derived tissues and therefore have the same accuracy problems and difficulty with extrapolation to humans as the Draize test. Moreover, the very short term viability of these corneas (tests are done on the day of enucleation) will not allow for longer term screening of more chronic effects of the milder test substances.
Organ cultured human corneas can be used for testing.
Richard et al. (1991), Anderson et al. (1993) and Collin et al.
(1995) have successfully organ cultured freshly obtained whole human corneas, allowing for investigations to be carried out on whole corneas. However, organ cultured corneas have a finite lifespan. The longest time recorded is 21 days (Anderson et al. 1993). More importantly, the availability of donors is sporadic and donor corneas are too heterogeneous to be useful as a practical model for drug testing.
Other alternatives that have been developed include the EYTEX'1''' test from In Vitro International (formerly Ropak Laboratories) which is based on the quantification of opacity produced in a synthetic protein matrix on exposure to chemical irritants (Gordon, 1992); the Keratinocyte Neutral Red Uptake Bioassay from Clonetics Corporation based on the methodology of Borenfreund and Puerner (1985), the MTT assay using living skin equivalent from Advanced Tissue Sciences (Osborne et aI. 1995), and the Chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (Bagley et al., 1992). Trans-epithelial permeability assay can also be used as an in vitro assay for predicting ocular irritancy using MDCK
cells (Martin and Stott, 1992). Others use an agar diffusion cytolysis as an alternative screen for the prediction of a corrosive ocular response using rabbit cornea fibroblasts (Galer, 1992).
Results indicate that while it may not be possible to use a single test to classify compounds as to irritation potential, some of the alternative test models may be useful in prioritizing and reducing the number of in vivo irritation tests conducted. However, all of the tests are dependent upon continued rabbit eye testing as definitive tests and also to develop validation databases to aid interpretation of the in vi tro data .
Researchers have been attempting to reconstruct corneas in vitro from cell lines. Individual human corneal epithelial layers have been successfully maintained in culture as a stratified epithelium by Kahn et al. (1993) and Araki-Sasaki et al. (1995). These investigators had used corneal epithelial cell lines that were immortalized using a hybrid SV40-adenovirus. Successful reconstructions of corneas comprising the three main layers have also been recently reported by Minami et al. (1993) and Zieske et aI. (1994).
These corneas were reconstructed from either passaged primary cells from bovine (Minami et al. 1993), or mixed cultures of primary rabbit epithelial and stromal cells and an immortalized mouse endothelial cell line (Zieske et al. 1994).
To date, there have been no reports of successfully reconstructed human corneas based fully on human cell lines while mimicking the physiology of the human cornea and surrounding tissue.
Media used in preparing artificial corneas, or in culturing whole corneas, must be carefully selected to avoid detrimental effects to the desired process. Certain serum proteins will affect wound healing and hence a serum-free medium is desirable to allow optimal control of experimental conditions. Disclosed herein is a serum-free medium that may be used to prepare the cornea of the present invention, as well as for culturing whole corneas.
SU1~ARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an artificial mammalian cornea which comprises:
a) an endothelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) a stromal matrix;
c) an epithelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells; and d) at least one layer selected from Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane.
The present invention also provides a method for preparing an artif icial mammalian cornea which comprises:
a) growing an endothelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the endothelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the endothelium or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
15d) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an epithelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane is present.
The present invention further provides a method for preparing an artificial mammalian cornea which comprises:
25a) growing an epithelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the epithelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the epithelium or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
d) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an endothelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane is present.
The present invention also provides a commercial package which comprises:
a) the cornea as described herein, and 5 b) instructions for its use for testing a substance for ocular irritancy, toxicity or drug efficacy, or transplantation.
The present invention also provides a serum-free culture medium which comprises at least one of each of a protease inhibitor, a growth factor, a substance which mediates the growth factor and a free-radical scavenger, and preferably a substance which prevents cellular contraction, as well as instructions for use of the medium in culturing a cornea, preferably a human cornea, in vitro.
The present invention also provides an artificial sclera which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells.
Gene transfer and tissue culture techniques have been used to construct a cornea from immortalized human cell lines that is analogous to the human cornea in vivo. The corneal equivalent is preferentially surrounded by a sclera capable of mimicking inflammation responses.
Various different gene constructs have been introduced into the immortalized cell lines by transfection and/or retroviral infection to either overexpress, or block expression (antisense constructs) of, gene products in order to mimic different pathological conditions that occur in the cornea.
This allows the development of in vitro corneal disease models for studying drug treatment efficacy.
The model can also be modified to render it suitable for use in transplantation. Also described is a medium that can be used to start and maintain cultures of primary cells and cell lines from cornea and other tissues. The medium is also suitable for the culture of corneas, both artificial and natural, in the absence of serum.
The artificial cornea is preferably surrounded by a matrix in which angiogenesis (formation of capillary-like structures) can occur in vitro. The artificial cornea is physiologically and functionally similar to the human cornea and has the potential to respond to ocular irritants, drugs and injuries.
The surrounding angiogenic material plays the role of pseudo-sclera and thereby provides the ability to assess in vitro the angiogenic reaction to any chemical irritants, drugs or any injuries. The invention extends to a method for making the artificial cornea and a method for using the artificial cornea. Preferably, the corneal or scleral cells used, whether primary or immortalized, are of human origin.
The invention also provides a serum-free medium that has been used to successfully start and maintain the cell lines, as well as the artificial corneas. The medium may also be used in reconstruction of other body tissues that could be used as complementary in vitro models for alternative models to animal testing.
The artificial cornea can also be modified for transplantation by modification of the matrix compounds by physical and chemical treatments, and incorporation of matrix proteins or essential amino acid sequences and/or growth factors. Primary cells can be used until the safety of cells containing viral constructs for transplantation has been determined. In addition, cells from one or more layers may be omitted to allow for the host/patient's cells to repopulate the transplanted matrix material.
HRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention and its preferred embodiments may be better understood with reference to the following drawings.
Figure la and lb show methods of reconstruction of a cornea in vi tro.
Figure 2a shows one method used in reconstruction of the cornea and sclera in vitro.
Figure 2b shows another method of reconstructing the cornea and sclera in vi tro.
Figure 3 shows human cornea obtained from the Eye Bank and a cornea that was reconstructed from cell lines. Both were organs cultured in serum-free medium for one week.
Figure 4 shows sections through a reconstructed cornea compared with an organ-cultured human cornea. Both show well defined epithelial, stromal and endothelial layers. Descemet's membrane is present in both specimens. However, Bowman's layer is not prominent in either specimen as seen in other samples of organ cultured human corneas.
Figure 5 shows a section through a reconstructed human cornea visualized with epilfluorescence by confocalmicroscopy.
The epithelial and endothelial layers are distinct, and keratocytes are present in the collagenous stromal matrix.
Inset: H&E-stained section of the same cornea.
Figure 6 shows a cornea that was reconstructed with cell lines that were transformed. The three main layers are not readily distinguishable and the transformed epithelial cells are seen invading the stromal compartment. This sample demonstrates the importance of obtaining immortalized cell lines that are physiologically similar to low passage primary cells from the human cornea. Inset: H&E-stained section.
Figure 7 shows in situ hybridization, using a probe for alpha2(VIII) collagen, which is found in Descemet's membrane in the cornea and is known to be produced by corneal endothelial cells. Alpha2(VIII) mRNA is produced by this endothelial cell line, as shown by visualization of cell-bound alkaline phosphatase conjugated DIG-antisense riboprobe. The sense control-probe cells remain unlabelled.
Figure 8 shows an~epithelial cell line showing expression of a standard marker, cytokeratin by immunohistochemistry.
Figure 9 shows cytokeratin expression in the epithelium of a human cornea and in a reconstructed cornea.
Figure 10 shows a transmission electron micrograph of the epithelium of a reconstructed cornea after two weeks of culture at an air-liquid interface. Microplicae, a characteristic of corneal epithelial cells are present on the external surface and functional complexes have formed between cells (arrowheads).
Figure 11 shows a transmission electron micrograph of a reconstructed cornea after two weeks of culture at air-liquid interface, showing stromal keratocytes within a largely collagenous matrix. The nuclei (n) are electron lucent, and there are mitochondria (arrowheads) in the cytoplasm, indicating that the cells are healthy.
Figure 12 shows a transmission electron micrograph of the endothelial layer of a reconstructed cornea after two weeks of culture at air-liquid interface. Mitochondria are present' in the cytoplasm as indicated, and functional complexes (arrowheads) have formed between cells.
Figure 13 shows responses of reconstructed corneas to different aqueous test chemicals. Each cornea was exposed centrally to 100 ~1 of the test chemical for 10 min, after which the chemical was washed off with saline and the corneas were re-cultured for a further 3 days. The saline-treated cornea served as the control. Treatment with 10~ SDS and the dilute benzalkonium chloride solution caused wounds to the centre of the cornea as seen in changes of corneal transparency. The wound caused by the 0.01 benzalkonium chloride solution was able to heal but the SDS wound is still unhealed.
Figure 14 shows differences in responses of reconstructed corneas to SDS and 0.01 benzalkonium chloride solution, as visualised by live-dead staining. Live cells are green, while dying or dead cells are orange-red. A. Epithelial cells of dilute benzalkonium chloride treated cornea, showing some dead and dying cells but mostly live cells. B. SDS-treated construct, showing mostly dead and dying cells. C. Stromal cells of the benzalkonium solution-treated cornea are mostly alive, showing little/no penetration of solution into the stromal compartment. D. Stroma of SDS-treated cornea showing orange-red dead or dying cells, indicating penetration of the detergent into the stroma.
Figure 15 shows RT-PCR products showing expression of mRNA
for 8 genes that have been found to be related to corneal functioning, particularly in wound healing. Baseline levels in primary cultures of human corneal cells are compared with the immortalized cell lines that we have established. mRNAs for GAPDH (control housekeeping gene), Coll 1, c-fos, c-jun and bFGF are expressed equally in all the 8 types of cells. IL-la mRNA appears to be expressed at a higher level (or a similar level) in epithelial and stroma cell lines than in the primary cells. IL-6 mRNA may be expressed at a lower level in the endothelial cell line than in the primary endothelial cells.
1 = primary epithelium; 2 - primary stroma; 3 = primary endothelium; 4, 5 = immortalized epithelial lines;
6, 7 = immortalized stromal lines; 8 = immortalized endothelial line.
Figure 16 shows immortalized vascular endothelial cells in fibrin matrix after 7 days of cell culture in serum-free medium. A. In phase contrast, microvessels can be distinctively seen forming a network within the whole thickness of the matrix. Mag. 36x. B. On histological sections, capillary-like vessels can be observed. Mag. 90x.
Figure 17 shows reconstructed human cornea and sclera.
The angiogenic cells of the sclera have been labelled with a fluorescent marker, DiI-conjugated Low Density Lipoprotein (DiI-LDL). Inset: H&E-stained cornea and sclera. f, fibrin matrix with blood vessels; c, cornea. The cornea-sclera junction is indicated by the arrow.
Figure 18 shows higher magnification of the sclera showing Di-I-LDL labelled blood vessels.
Figure 19 is a diagram summarizing the organ culture protocol. A. View of culture dish assembly from the top.
B. View of culture dish assembly from the side. C. Corneas in culture at an air-liquid interface, created by the up and down cycles of the rocker.
Figure 20 shows human corneas cultured for 3 weeks.
A. Epithelium, showing uniformed stratified squamous epithelia (ep) of five layers. The underlying Bowman's membrane (*) is present. The stroma (s) shows no signs of edema. Bar, 60 ~,m. B. Endothelial layer (en) and Descemet's membrane (arrow) were also intact.
Figure 21 are TEM micrographs of the corneal epithelium after 2 weeks in culture. A. Cell showing an electron lucent nucleus (n). B. Cells also retained their functional complexes (arrowheads) and characteristic microplicae (m). Culture artifacts (*) were present but the ultrastructural observations 5 suggested that the cells were still healthy.
Figure 22 is a section through a cornea that was ablated to give a wound of 6 mm in diameter and about 190 ~.m deep (cornea thickness is 500 ~,m) after 10 days in organ culture.
The stroma (s) underlying the ablation in samples with such 10 deep wounds often develops edema (e). However, the epithelium (ep) has grown over the stroma and there is some re-stratification. Bar, 20 ~,m.
Figure 23 are electon micrographs. A. SEM of half a cornea that had been treated with the excimer laser in the central zone. High myopia treatment parameters of 6 mm, -12 D
(about 190 ~m deep) were used. Arrows indicate the treatment boundary. Bar, 2 mm. B. Epithelial cells in the treated central area. Bar, 100 Vim. C. Epithelium in the untreated peripheral area. Bar, 100 ~Cm.
Figure 24 shows wavelength dependence of transparency and non-specular reflection of excised and reconstructed corneas:
Transparency (A) and non-specular reflection (B) of excised animal corneas and reconstructed corneas as a function of wavelength.
Figure 25 shows dosage response of animal and reconstructed corneas: Reconstructed (A), rabbit (B) and porcine (C) corneas were exposed to different chemicals and for different exposure times. Transparency was measured with transparent light.
Figure 26 (a-j) shows relative intensities of RT-PCR bands for SDS-treated and untreated human artificial corneas. Band intensities for the indicated genes were quantitated by a phosphoimager and were divided by the intensity of the corresponding GAPDH band. Corneas were treated with 5~ SDS in medium for 1 or 3 minutes, then washed twice with medium.
Total RNA was extracted at 1 hour after the SDS treatment, and RT-PCR was carried out for specific primers for various genes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The invention comprises mammalian, preferably human, corneal cell lines, either primary or immortalized, that have been reconstructed to mimic the human cornea in structure, physiological functioning and responses to drugs, chemicals and other compounds. The reconstructed cornea can be constructed on its own or with a surrounding sclera. The latter is preferred when testing of angiogenic responses are required (e.g. in mimicking conditions when vascular invasion of the cornea occurs due to irritation or injury from physical or chemical sources or disease). The reconstructed cornea with/without sclera can be cultivated either in serum-supplemented medium or a serum-free medium such as the one described herein.
Corneal cell liaes Cell lines are produced from each of the main corneal layers: epithelium, stroma and endothelium. The epithelial and endothelial layers are isolated by scraping post-mortem human corneas with a surgical Gill knife. Pieces from each of these layers are placed separately in culture medium containing a 1:1 mixture of Medium 199 (GIBCO, Burlington, Canada): Optisol (Chiron Ophthalmics, Irvine, CA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO), 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS; Becton Dickinson Canada, Mississauga, Canada) and 0.1%
gentamicin (GIBCO). The serum-free medium disclosed herein can also be used, as well as any conventional serum-based or serum-free growth medium.
The pieces are dissociated by pipetting up and down and the cells are left to grow out onto the tissue culture dish.
The stroma, which is scraped clean of residual epithelium and endothelium is cut into pieces and digested with 0.25%
collagenase at 37'C for several hours to loosen the matrix and release stromal keratocytes. The stromal pieces are further broken down by either pipetting or passing through a syringe.
The collagenase is removed by aspiration after centrifugation of the mixture. The dissociated stroma is then plated onto tissue culture dishes and supplemented with the serum-free medium described herein.
The cells take from two days to over a week to settle and multiply. After colonies are present, the medium is aspirated and replaced with Medium 199, 10% FBS and 1% ITS. Colonies of outgrowing cells with the appropriate morphology for the cell type are picked out and expanded. These are then used for producing immortalized cell lines.
Cell lines for reconstruction can be immortalized in a variety of ways. Current methods include, but are not limited to, transfection with viral oncoproteins (Kahn et al., 1993), infection with retrovirus containing HPV E6 and E7 genes (Halbert et al., 1991, 1992) and methods that would reactivate cellular telomerase activity (Bodnar et al., 1998). Cell lines could also include those that contain genes conferring immortality (or transformation) which can be turned "on" and "off" in regulated gene expression systems (eg. Clonetech's Tet-On/Tet-Offer'') . _ Cells used in the present invention were preferably immortalized in two ways. Some primary cells (endothelial, stromal, epithelial) were transfected with a combination of plasmids that contained the SV40 large T antigen, pSV3neo (Southern and Berg, 1982) and the AD5-ElA region (gift from Dr.
Steve Whelan), using standard calcium phosphate transfection, using a BES buffer. After transfection, the cells were returned to their regular medium (M199, 1'0% FBS, 1% ITS) and then passaged just before confluence. Resistance to 6418 was used to select for successful transfectants. For corneal cells, 1 mg/ml 6418 was added to the culture medium until the control cells died.
Corneal epithelial cell lines were exposed to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to characterise the changes in mRNA
expression of early response genes such as c-fos and c-jun, cytokines probably involved with corneal wound healing such as interleukins (IL-la and IL-6), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), and matrix molecules that are elaborated during healing such as collagens types I, III and V.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to examine changes in expression of the above genes in corneal epithelial cell lines compared to primary cells, and in artificial corneas compared to human corneas from the eye bank after exposure to a detergent SDS. The cells were exposed to 0.02 SDS in M199 for 2 minutes. Corneas were treated with 5~ SDS in M199. Controls were dosed with M199 only. RT-PCR
was performed on RNA from cells and corneas obtained at different time points after injury. Semi-quantitative analyses were conducted by introducing the housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal control and by Southern analysis. PCR products were sequenced to confirm their identity.
Results are shown in Figure 26. Baseline levels of the 10 mRNAs examined were established in control epithelial cells and corneas (n > or = 6 for each time point). Expression of c-fos and c-jun was significantly increased within 1 hour of SDS injury in both primary epithelial cells and epithelial cell lines. Expression of c-fos returned to baseline levels by the end of 24 hours, but c-jun expression remained high until day 6 after injury. There was also increased expression in IL-1a, IL-6, collagen I and collagen V mRNA. However, changes in mRNA
expression for bFGF, VEGF, EGF and collagen III were non-significant.
The pattern of changes in gene expression in SDS-treated reconstructed corneas (n=6) was similar to that in monolayers of epithelial cells. However, these changes were more marked in the reconstructed whole corneas than in the epithelial monolayers.
Both cells in monolayer cultures and whole corneas showed changes in gene expression following exposure to SDS. These changes in established cell lines were comparable to those in primary cells. Reconstructed corneas, like human eye bank corneas, also responded to SDS exposure with changes in gene expression.
Other cells (epithelial, stromal, endothelial) were WO 99/37752 PCTlCA99/00057 infected with an amphotropic recombinant retrovirus that contains HPV16 genes E6 and E7 (Halbert et al., 1991, 1992).
The producer cell line PA317LXSN 16E6E7 was obtained from the ATCC. Essentially the corneal cells were infected with serially diluted viral-containing conditioned culture supernatants from the producer cells in the presence of ~.g/ml polybrene (Sigma, St. Louis, M0, USA). After 24 hours of exposure to the virus, the viral supernatant was removed and the cells cultured, passaged once and then immortalized cells 10 were selected for by 6418 resistance.
Other genes have been incorporated into the cell lines.
For example, the gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP), a fluorescent reporter molecule, available in expression vectors (eg. from Clonetech) was incorporated into the cell lines by transfection followed by selection. GFP-producing cell lines can be tracked within the reconstructed cornea in wound healing or other lineage studies.
Electrophysiological screening of cells All three types of cell lines were initially screened for functional morphological criteria. Cells of appropriate morphology were screened for functional electrophysiologic similarities to human cornea cells by use of patch clamp technology to examine ionic currents. The patch clamp technique is disclosed in numerous scientific articles, including Rae (1991) and Watsky (1992), which are incorporated herein by reference. Cells that were similar to corneal cells morphologically and electrophysiologically were screened for expression of the appropriate biochemical markers. Cells that were deemed similar to those of the cornea were then given a final test by performing an initial reconstruction of the cornea only.
Example 1 Cells having the appropriate morphology were screened to compare the electrophysiologic characteristics of the cells to non-transfected cells. In this way, it was verified that the cells were truly immortalized and that the cells were not transformed, that is that they retained the phenotypic characteristics of normal cultured cells. Cells that passed these tests were deemed suitable for inclusion in the artificial cornea of the invention, as long as they passed 5 subsequent immunohistochemical and DNA screens. Cells that did not have the appropriate electrophysiological characteristics were not included in the invention.
Single cells for patch clamp analysis of transfected and non-transfected cells were obtained by washing cultured cells 10 free of culture medium using PBS containing 0.53 mM EDTA and then incubating with Ca+z and Mg'2 free Hanks' balanced salt solution (GIBCO) containing 0.05 trypsin and 0.53 mM EDTA for 2 minutes at 37°C in a 5~ COZ incubator. Loose cells were aspirated into a Pasteur pipette and transferred into a conical 15 tube containing Media 199 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Isolated cells were transferred to an inverted microscope mounted with an external stage, placed into an acrylic chamber filled with Ringer's solution, and allowed to settle and attach to the glass bottom.
Macroscopic currents in single cells were examined using the perforated-patch configuration of the whole-cell patch-clamp technique with amphotericin B as the perforating agent. The composition of the patch pipette in millimolar was 145 potassium methanesulfonate, 2.5 NaCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 5 HEPES, and 250 mg/ml amphotericin B. Patch pipettes were fabricated from KG-12 capillary glass, coated with Sylgard (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and fire polished. Currents were recorded at room temperature using a patch-clamp amplifier operated by Gateway 486DX2 computer (Gateway 2000, Sioux City, SD) loaded with pCLAMP software (Axon 200A, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) for the generation of voltage-clamp protocols. Current recordings were capacity compensated using the amplifier circuitry, sampled between 2 to 5 kHz, filtered between 1 to 2 kHz, and subsequently analyzed with the software program.
Voltage-clamp protocols were repeated at least three times to obtain the average current response to a voltage pulse.
Current voltage (I-V) relationships were corrected for the junction potential generated by the pipette solution and the amphotericin B-induced Donnan potential by subtracting the difference between the reversal potential of tail currents measured in symmetrical K* solutions and the 0 mV potential.
S The following patch-clamp electrophysiologic tests were performed on and compared in both cultured non-transfected cells and cultured transfected (immortalized) cells. In the description that follows, tests performed on human corneal epithelial cells are described as an example of the comparative testing. It is to be understood, however, that the electrophysiological testing may be performed on any cell which is considered for inclusion in the artificial cornea of the invention, which cell is preferably compared electrophysiologically to cells which are normally found in the analogous layer of the natural cornea.
Example l.l. Whole cell current appearance of Nonselective Cation Current Single cells were bathed in NaCl or KC1 based Ringer's solution. Individual cells were held at a resting voltage of 0 mV and then had their membrane potential relative to ground clamped to different voltages from -80 mV to 130 mV in 15 mV
steps, with each step followed by a return to the 0 mV resting voltage. The current produced by the cell at each voltage was measured and plotted over time to produce a graph representative of the steady-state whole-cell nonselective current appearance of the cell. In both NaCl and KC1 Ringer's solution, human corneal epithelial cells typically had a similar outwardly rectifying current which was relatively noisy and showed no inactivation. No tail current was observed in either solution with this protocol. The current was not sensitive to the transmembrane holding voltage, 1 mM external barium or 1 mM external gadolinium.
Example 1.2. Current voltage relationships The current to voltage (I-V) relationship of the steady state current responses produced above was plotted and showed that, for human corneal epithelial cells, the depolarization voltage required for current activation was approximately 50 mV
The invention comprises mammalian, preferably human, corneal cell lines, either primary or immortalized, that have been reconstructed to mimic the human cornea in structure, physiological functioning and responses to drugs, chemicals and other compounds. The reconstructed cornea can be constructed on its own or with a surrounding sclera. The latter is preferred when testing of angiogenic responses are required (e.g. in mimicking conditions when vascular invasion of the cornea occurs due to irritation or injury from physical or chemical sources or disease). The reconstructed cornea with/without sclera can be cultivated either in serum-supplemented medium or a serum-free medium such as the one described herein.
Corneal cell liaes Cell lines are produced from each of the main corneal layers: epithelium, stroma and endothelium. The epithelial and endothelial layers are isolated by scraping post-mortem human corneas with a surgical Gill knife. Pieces from each of these layers are placed separately in culture medium containing a 1:1 mixture of Medium 199 (GIBCO, Burlington, Canada): Optisol (Chiron Ophthalmics, Irvine, CA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO), 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS; Becton Dickinson Canada, Mississauga, Canada) and 0.1%
gentamicin (GIBCO). The serum-free medium disclosed herein can also be used, as well as any conventional serum-based or serum-free growth medium.
The pieces are dissociated by pipetting up and down and the cells are left to grow out onto the tissue culture dish.
The stroma, which is scraped clean of residual epithelium and endothelium is cut into pieces and digested with 0.25%
collagenase at 37'C for several hours to loosen the matrix and release stromal keratocytes. The stromal pieces are further broken down by either pipetting or passing through a syringe.
The collagenase is removed by aspiration after centrifugation of the mixture. The dissociated stroma is then plated onto tissue culture dishes and supplemented with the serum-free medium described herein.
The cells take from two days to over a week to settle and multiply. After colonies are present, the medium is aspirated and replaced with Medium 199, 10% FBS and 1% ITS. Colonies of outgrowing cells with the appropriate morphology for the cell type are picked out and expanded. These are then used for producing immortalized cell lines.
Cell lines for reconstruction can be immortalized in a variety of ways. Current methods include, but are not limited to, transfection with viral oncoproteins (Kahn et al., 1993), infection with retrovirus containing HPV E6 and E7 genes (Halbert et al., 1991, 1992) and methods that would reactivate cellular telomerase activity (Bodnar et al., 1998). Cell lines could also include those that contain genes conferring immortality (or transformation) which can be turned "on" and "off" in regulated gene expression systems (eg. Clonetech's Tet-On/Tet-Offer'') . _ Cells used in the present invention were preferably immortalized in two ways. Some primary cells (endothelial, stromal, epithelial) were transfected with a combination of plasmids that contained the SV40 large T antigen, pSV3neo (Southern and Berg, 1982) and the AD5-ElA region (gift from Dr.
Steve Whelan), using standard calcium phosphate transfection, using a BES buffer. After transfection, the cells were returned to their regular medium (M199, 1'0% FBS, 1% ITS) and then passaged just before confluence. Resistance to 6418 was used to select for successful transfectants. For corneal cells, 1 mg/ml 6418 was added to the culture medium until the control cells died.
Corneal epithelial cell lines were exposed to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to characterise the changes in mRNA
expression of early response genes such as c-fos and c-jun, cytokines probably involved with corneal wound healing such as interleukins (IL-la and IL-6), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), and matrix molecules that are elaborated during healing such as collagens types I, III and V.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to examine changes in expression of the above genes in corneal epithelial cell lines compared to primary cells, and in artificial corneas compared to human corneas from the eye bank after exposure to a detergent SDS. The cells were exposed to 0.02 SDS in M199 for 2 minutes. Corneas were treated with 5~ SDS in M199. Controls were dosed with M199 only. RT-PCR
was performed on RNA from cells and corneas obtained at different time points after injury. Semi-quantitative analyses were conducted by introducing the housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal control and by Southern analysis. PCR products were sequenced to confirm their identity.
Results are shown in Figure 26. Baseline levels of the 10 mRNAs examined were established in control epithelial cells and corneas (n > or = 6 for each time point). Expression of c-fos and c-jun was significantly increased within 1 hour of SDS injury in both primary epithelial cells and epithelial cell lines. Expression of c-fos returned to baseline levels by the end of 24 hours, but c-jun expression remained high until day 6 after injury. There was also increased expression in IL-1a, IL-6, collagen I and collagen V mRNA. However, changes in mRNA
expression for bFGF, VEGF, EGF and collagen III were non-significant.
The pattern of changes in gene expression in SDS-treated reconstructed corneas (n=6) was similar to that in monolayers of epithelial cells. However, these changes were more marked in the reconstructed whole corneas than in the epithelial monolayers.
Both cells in monolayer cultures and whole corneas showed changes in gene expression following exposure to SDS. These changes in established cell lines were comparable to those in primary cells. Reconstructed corneas, like human eye bank corneas, also responded to SDS exposure with changes in gene expression.
Other cells (epithelial, stromal, endothelial) were WO 99/37752 PCTlCA99/00057 infected with an amphotropic recombinant retrovirus that contains HPV16 genes E6 and E7 (Halbert et al., 1991, 1992).
The producer cell line PA317LXSN 16E6E7 was obtained from the ATCC. Essentially the corneal cells were infected with serially diluted viral-containing conditioned culture supernatants from the producer cells in the presence of ~.g/ml polybrene (Sigma, St. Louis, M0, USA). After 24 hours of exposure to the virus, the viral supernatant was removed and the cells cultured, passaged once and then immortalized cells 10 were selected for by 6418 resistance.
Other genes have been incorporated into the cell lines.
For example, the gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP), a fluorescent reporter molecule, available in expression vectors (eg. from Clonetech) was incorporated into the cell lines by transfection followed by selection. GFP-producing cell lines can be tracked within the reconstructed cornea in wound healing or other lineage studies.
Electrophysiological screening of cells All three types of cell lines were initially screened for functional morphological criteria. Cells of appropriate morphology were screened for functional electrophysiologic similarities to human cornea cells by use of patch clamp technology to examine ionic currents. The patch clamp technique is disclosed in numerous scientific articles, including Rae (1991) and Watsky (1992), which are incorporated herein by reference. Cells that were similar to corneal cells morphologically and electrophysiologically were screened for expression of the appropriate biochemical markers. Cells that were deemed similar to those of the cornea were then given a final test by performing an initial reconstruction of the cornea only.
Example 1 Cells having the appropriate morphology were screened to compare the electrophysiologic characteristics of the cells to non-transfected cells. In this way, it was verified that the cells were truly immortalized and that the cells were not transformed, that is that they retained the phenotypic characteristics of normal cultured cells. Cells that passed these tests were deemed suitable for inclusion in the artificial cornea of the invention, as long as they passed 5 subsequent immunohistochemical and DNA screens. Cells that did not have the appropriate electrophysiological characteristics were not included in the invention.
Single cells for patch clamp analysis of transfected and non-transfected cells were obtained by washing cultured cells 10 free of culture medium using PBS containing 0.53 mM EDTA and then incubating with Ca+z and Mg'2 free Hanks' balanced salt solution (GIBCO) containing 0.05 trypsin and 0.53 mM EDTA for 2 minutes at 37°C in a 5~ COZ incubator. Loose cells were aspirated into a Pasteur pipette and transferred into a conical 15 tube containing Media 199 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Isolated cells were transferred to an inverted microscope mounted with an external stage, placed into an acrylic chamber filled with Ringer's solution, and allowed to settle and attach to the glass bottom.
Macroscopic currents in single cells were examined using the perforated-patch configuration of the whole-cell patch-clamp technique with amphotericin B as the perforating agent. The composition of the patch pipette in millimolar was 145 potassium methanesulfonate, 2.5 NaCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 5 HEPES, and 250 mg/ml amphotericin B. Patch pipettes were fabricated from KG-12 capillary glass, coated with Sylgard (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and fire polished. Currents were recorded at room temperature using a patch-clamp amplifier operated by Gateway 486DX2 computer (Gateway 2000, Sioux City, SD) loaded with pCLAMP software (Axon 200A, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) for the generation of voltage-clamp protocols. Current recordings were capacity compensated using the amplifier circuitry, sampled between 2 to 5 kHz, filtered between 1 to 2 kHz, and subsequently analyzed with the software program.
Voltage-clamp protocols were repeated at least three times to obtain the average current response to a voltage pulse.
Current voltage (I-V) relationships were corrected for the junction potential generated by the pipette solution and the amphotericin B-induced Donnan potential by subtracting the difference between the reversal potential of tail currents measured in symmetrical K* solutions and the 0 mV potential.
S The following patch-clamp electrophysiologic tests were performed on and compared in both cultured non-transfected cells and cultured transfected (immortalized) cells. In the description that follows, tests performed on human corneal epithelial cells are described as an example of the comparative testing. It is to be understood, however, that the electrophysiological testing may be performed on any cell which is considered for inclusion in the artificial cornea of the invention, which cell is preferably compared electrophysiologically to cells which are normally found in the analogous layer of the natural cornea.
Example l.l. Whole cell current appearance of Nonselective Cation Current Single cells were bathed in NaCl or KC1 based Ringer's solution. Individual cells were held at a resting voltage of 0 mV and then had their membrane potential relative to ground clamped to different voltages from -80 mV to 130 mV in 15 mV
steps, with each step followed by a return to the 0 mV resting voltage. The current produced by the cell at each voltage was measured and plotted over time to produce a graph representative of the steady-state whole-cell nonselective current appearance of the cell. In both NaCl and KC1 Ringer's solution, human corneal epithelial cells typically had a similar outwardly rectifying current which was relatively noisy and showed no inactivation. No tail current was observed in either solution with this protocol. The current was not sensitive to the transmembrane holding voltage, 1 mM external barium or 1 mM external gadolinium.
Example 1.2. Current voltage relationships The current to voltage (I-V) relationship of the steady state current responses produced above was plotted and showed that, for human corneal epithelial cells, the depolarization voltage required for current activation was approximately 50 mV
and that the I-V relationship for activation of the current was similar whether the cells were bathed in NaCl or Kcl.
Example 1.3. Ion Selectivity of the Current The outward current of the tested cells was activated with S a depolarizing voltage pulse (100 mV) followed by a aeries of voltage steps to generate a family of instantaneous tail current responses. The instantaneous tail I-V relationship was plotted with the current (I) on the y-axis and voltage (V) on the x-axis. From this plot, the membrane potential (Ere") where the outward current reversed to an inward current was determined. The Ere" of a cell is characteristic of the ions that carry a select current in the cell. The noisy outward current of cultured human corneal epithelial cells reversed at approximately -5 mV, indicating the equal involvement of Na+ and K~ ions in carrying current through nonselective cation channels.
Example 1.4. Pharmacological activators The tests of examples 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 were repeated following the addition of 100 ~.M flufenamic acid (FFA) to the NaCl Ringer's bath. In cultured human corneal epithelial cells, addition of FFA elicited a current causing a more than 10-fold increase in the maximum outward current present in the cells not exposed to FFA. The I-V plot showed that the FFA-stimulated current activated at about -60 mV. The FFA
response was reversible and repeatable in the same cell. The addition of 3 rnM tetraethylammonium (TEA) blocked the FFA-activated current and produced an T-V relationship substantially the same as for cells in baths lacking FFA.
Likewise, the addition of 5 mM Ba'2 blocked the FFA-stimulated current.
To determine the ion selectivity of this TEA-sensitive FFA-activated current, cultured human corneal epithelial cells were bathed in NaCl Ringer's solution with 100 ~.M FFA and a family of instantaneous tail currents was generated. The same cells were then bathed in NaCl Ringer's solution with 100 ACM FFA and 3 mM TEA and a second family of instantaneous tail currents was generated. An instantaneous tail I-V plot was obtained by digitally subtracting the instantaneous tail responses determined for the same cell bathed with FFA with and without TEA. The Ere" for the TEA-sensitive FFA-activated current was calculated to be about -80 mV, close to the -86 mV
Erev found for a purely selective K' selective channel. These results, together with the fact that the FFA-activated current was inhibited by K' channel blockers TEA and Ba'Z, demonstrate that the FFA-activated current is carried by K+.
In addition to the above channels, by using patch clamp testing, it has been determined that cultured human corneal epithelial cells may have one or more of the following channels: 1) a second K+ current that is stimulated by FFA and is active only at voltages greater than +10 mV, 2) a rapidly activating inward voltage dependent Na' current that is observed when the transmembrane potential is held at -90 mV and reaches a peak by 1.5 msec and is almost completely inactivated by 16 msec. This current is not observed when the transmembrane potential is held at 0 mV. 3) An inwardly rectifying K" current active at voltages between -40 and -80 mV. 4) A second nonselective cation current with characteristics different than the one described in Examples 1.1 to 1.3.
For purposes of making the artificial cornea of the invention, cells are selected which have electrophysiological characteristics of normal, non-transfected, corneal cells and which do not have electrophysiological characteristics which are not present in normal corneal cells. That is, cells were deemed to be suitable for inclusion in the artificial cornea if they possessed at least one of the channels found in normal, cultured corneal cells. For corneal epithelial cells, it is preferable although not essential that they contain the TEA-sensitive FFA-activated current. Preferably, the selected cell contains more than one of the channels, and most preferably, it contains all the channels found in normal cells.
On the other hand, the presence in transfected cells of a channel not found in the normal, non-transfected cell indicates that the cell has been transformed and that its phenotype is no longer the same as that of a normal cell. Therefore, the active presence of these unnatural channels renders a cell unsuitable for inclusion in the artificial cornea of the invention.
The above description of the patch-clamp technique for determining physiologic similarity to corneal cells is provided as an example. One skilled in the art will understand that the method of assessing physiologic similarity to normal cells is immaterial so long as the method permits the determination of similarity to normal cells and the absence or presence of characteristics which indicate transformation.
Morphological and biochemical markers Epithelial and endothelial cells were initially selected for by their cobblestone morphology at confluence. Stromal keratocytes are characteristically fibroblastic and form whorls at confluence. After this initial screening, cells were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for expressed adenovirus ElA or large T antigen. Cells that expressed these.
proteins were then screened electrophysiologically for similarities to cells that were freshly dissociated from post-mortem corneas and from low passage primary cultures, as described herein. Following the electrophysiological screening, the cells were then screened for expression of the following cell type specific markers. Epithelial cells were stained with the AE5 antibody (ICN) that recognises corneal specific keratin 3, a 64kD protein found in differentiated corneal epithelial cells (Schermer et al. 1986) as previously described (Bockman et al., 1998). Keratocytes were stained for vimentin, an intermediate filament which is used as a marker for fibroblastic cells, using an antibody from Sigma.
Endothelial cells were probed by in situ hybridisation, using run-off RNA transcripts that were labelled with digoxigenin (Griffith, 1997), for expression of alpha2(VIII) collagen, which is produced by the corneal endothelium and is a component of Descemet's membrane.
Reconstruction of the cornea The method used is a modification of the protocol described in Zieske et al. (1994). In the present reconstruction method, the insert used is preferably an 5 open-topped plastic cylinder with a semi-porous membrane base.
More preferably, either a Costar transwell insert that is pre-coated with type I and type III collagen, or a Milllicell-CM {Millipore) culture insert is used. The latter inserts were coated, preferentially by airbrushing, with type I
10 collagen (Collaborative) in 60% ethanol. For the latter, the coated inserts are air dried and washed with medium several times to neutralize the acidity of the collagen preparation.
Corneal endothelial cells in culture were trypsinized, re-suspended in complete Medium 199 (M199 + 10% FBS + 1% ITS +
15 gentamicin) and plated onto the collagen coated insert at a density of 3.0 x 105 cells per ml. The cells were allowed to grow until about 80% confluence.
Descemet's membrane, which in this case was a mixture of type I and IV collagen and fibronectin in collagen medium 20 (comprising M199, HEPES buffer (200 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaOH), FBS
and gentamicin) was then layered on top of the layer of endothelial cells. After this mixture had gelled, the stroma, which is a mixture of type I collagen and 1.5% chondroitin or chondroitin sulphate {other proteoglycans can be substituted to give different consistencies and transparency) in the collagen medium containing 7.5 x 10' keratocytes per ml, was layered on top. 1.3 ml of stroma was placed into each insert. It is preferred that the stromal matrix is crosslinked. A preferred crosslinker is gluteraldehyde. The stroma was then allowed to set in the 37'C incubator for 20 minutes.
Bowman's membrane was then added. This consisted of 150 /cl of neutralized type I collagen with 0.1 mg/ml fibronectin and 0.1 mg/ml laminin per insert that was added on top of the stroma and allowed to set.
Finally, 3.0 x 105 cells per ml epithelial cells were plated on top of the collagen matrix. The culture inserts containing the reconstituted corneas were then cultured until the epithelial cells reached confluence. This usually took one week. Once the reconstruction was completed, the corneas were cultured in serum-free medium. The serum-free medium comprises at least one of each of a protease inhibitor, such as aprotinin; a growth factor, such as EGF or bFGF; a substance which mediates the growth factor, such as a proteoglycan, preferably chondroitin sulphate; a protein such as heparin; and a free radical scavenger, such as superoxide dismutase.
Preferably, the serum-free medium further comprises a cell growth promotor that also prevents cellular contraction, such as retinol acetate. A preferred serum-free medium, as shown in Table 1, was used.
Example 1.3. Ion Selectivity of the Current The outward current of the tested cells was activated with S a depolarizing voltage pulse (100 mV) followed by a aeries of voltage steps to generate a family of instantaneous tail current responses. The instantaneous tail I-V relationship was plotted with the current (I) on the y-axis and voltage (V) on the x-axis. From this plot, the membrane potential (Ere") where the outward current reversed to an inward current was determined. The Ere" of a cell is characteristic of the ions that carry a select current in the cell. The noisy outward current of cultured human corneal epithelial cells reversed at approximately -5 mV, indicating the equal involvement of Na+ and K~ ions in carrying current through nonselective cation channels.
Example 1.4. Pharmacological activators The tests of examples 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 were repeated following the addition of 100 ~.M flufenamic acid (FFA) to the NaCl Ringer's bath. In cultured human corneal epithelial cells, addition of FFA elicited a current causing a more than 10-fold increase in the maximum outward current present in the cells not exposed to FFA. The I-V plot showed that the FFA-stimulated current activated at about -60 mV. The FFA
response was reversible and repeatable in the same cell. The addition of 3 rnM tetraethylammonium (TEA) blocked the FFA-activated current and produced an T-V relationship substantially the same as for cells in baths lacking FFA.
Likewise, the addition of 5 mM Ba'2 blocked the FFA-stimulated current.
To determine the ion selectivity of this TEA-sensitive FFA-activated current, cultured human corneal epithelial cells were bathed in NaCl Ringer's solution with 100 ~.M FFA and a family of instantaneous tail currents was generated. The same cells were then bathed in NaCl Ringer's solution with 100 ACM FFA and 3 mM TEA and a second family of instantaneous tail currents was generated. An instantaneous tail I-V plot was obtained by digitally subtracting the instantaneous tail responses determined for the same cell bathed with FFA with and without TEA. The Ere" for the TEA-sensitive FFA-activated current was calculated to be about -80 mV, close to the -86 mV
Erev found for a purely selective K' selective channel. These results, together with the fact that the FFA-activated current was inhibited by K' channel blockers TEA and Ba'Z, demonstrate that the FFA-activated current is carried by K+.
In addition to the above channels, by using patch clamp testing, it has been determined that cultured human corneal epithelial cells may have one or more of the following channels: 1) a second K+ current that is stimulated by FFA and is active only at voltages greater than +10 mV, 2) a rapidly activating inward voltage dependent Na' current that is observed when the transmembrane potential is held at -90 mV and reaches a peak by 1.5 msec and is almost completely inactivated by 16 msec. This current is not observed when the transmembrane potential is held at 0 mV. 3) An inwardly rectifying K" current active at voltages between -40 and -80 mV. 4) A second nonselective cation current with characteristics different than the one described in Examples 1.1 to 1.3.
For purposes of making the artificial cornea of the invention, cells are selected which have electrophysiological characteristics of normal, non-transfected, corneal cells and which do not have electrophysiological characteristics which are not present in normal corneal cells. That is, cells were deemed to be suitable for inclusion in the artificial cornea if they possessed at least one of the channels found in normal, cultured corneal cells. For corneal epithelial cells, it is preferable although not essential that they contain the TEA-sensitive FFA-activated current. Preferably, the selected cell contains more than one of the channels, and most preferably, it contains all the channels found in normal cells.
On the other hand, the presence in transfected cells of a channel not found in the normal, non-transfected cell indicates that the cell has been transformed and that its phenotype is no longer the same as that of a normal cell. Therefore, the active presence of these unnatural channels renders a cell unsuitable for inclusion in the artificial cornea of the invention.
The above description of the patch-clamp technique for determining physiologic similarity to corneal cells is provided as an example. One skilled in the art will understand that the method of assessing physiologic similarity to normal cells is immaterial so long as the method permits the determination of similarity to normal cells and the absence or presence of characteristics which indicate transformation.
Morphological and biochemical markers Epithelial and endothelial cells were initially selected for by their cobblestone morphology at confluence. Stromal keratocytes are characteristically fibroblastic and form whorls at confluence. After this initial screening, cells were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for expressed adenovirus ElA or large T antigen. Cells that expressed these.
proteins were then screened electrophysiologically for similarities to cells that were freshly dissociated from post-mortem corneas and from low passage primary cultures, as described herein. Following the electrophysiological screening, the cells were then screened for expression of the following cell type specific markers. Epithelial cells were stained with the AE5 antibody (ICN) that recognises corneal specific keratin 3, a 64kD protein found in differentiated corneal epithelial cells (Schermer et al. 1986) as previously described (Bockman et al., 1998). Keratocytes were stained for vimentin, an intermediate filament which is used as a marker for fibroblastic cells, using an antibody from Sigma.
Endothelial cells were probed by in situ hybridisation, using run-off RNA transcripts that were labelled with digoxigenin (Griffith, 1997), for expression of alpha2(VIII) collagen, which is produced by the corneal endothelium and is a component of Descemet's membrane.
Reconstruction of the cornea The method used is a modification of the protocol described in Zieske et al. (1994). In the present reconstruction method, the insert used is preferably an 5 open-topped plastic cylinder with a semi-porous membrane base.
More preferably, either a Costar transwell insert that is pre-coated with type I and type III collagen, or a Milllicell-CM {Millipore) culture insert is used. The latter inserts were coated, preferentially by airbrushing, with type I
10 collagen (Collaborative) in 60% ethanol. For the latter, the coated inserts are air dried and washed with medium several times to neutralize the acidity of the collagen preparation.
Corneal endothelial cells in culture were trypsinized, re-suspended in complete Medium 199 (M199 + 10% FBS + 1% ITS +
15 gentamicin) and plated onto the collagen coated insert at a density of 3.0 x 105 cells per ml. The cells were allowed to grow until about 80% confluence.
Descemet's membrane, which in this case was a mixture of type I and IV collagen and fibronectin in collagen medium 20 (comprising M199, HEPES buffer (200 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaOH), FBS
and gentamicin) was then layered on top of the layer of endothelial cells. After this mixture had gelled, the stroma, which is a mixture of type I collagen and 1.5% chondroitin or chondroitin sulphate {other proteoglycans can be substituted to give different consistencies and transparency) in the collagen medium containing 7.5 x 10' keratocytes per ml, was layered on top. 1.3 ml of stroma was placed into each insert. It is preferred that the stromal matrix is crosslinked. A preferred crosslinker is gluteraldehyde. The stroma was then allowed to set in the 37'C incubator for 20 minutes.
Bowman's membrane was then added. This consisted of 150 /cl of neutralized type I collagen with 0.1 mg/ml fibronectin and 0.1 mg/ml laminin per insert that was added on top of the stroma and allowed to set.
Finally, 3.0 x 105 cells per ml epithelial cells were plated on top of the collagen matrix. The culture inserts containing the reconstituted corneas were then cultured until the epithelial cells reached confluence. This usually took one week. Once the reconstruction was completed, the corneas were cultured in serum-free medium. The serum-free medium comprises at least one of each of a protease inhibitor, such as aprotinin; a growth factor, such as EGF or bFGF; a substance which mediates the growth factor, such as a proteoglycan, preferably chondroitin sulphate; a protein such as heparin; and a free radical scavenger, such as superoxide dismutase.
Preferably, the serum-free medium further comprises a cell growth promotor that also prevents cellular contraction, such as retinol acetate. A preferred serum-free medium, as shown in Table 1, was used.
TABLE 1. Composition of 2X stock for serum-free medium.
For 100m1 Final Conc.
DMEM 94 ml Insulin-transferrin-selenium 2 ml 1~
Dextran 2 g 3 mg/ml Albumax 0.6 g 3 mg/ml Chondroitin Sulphate C 2.7 g (1.350 Sodium heparin 0.018 g Glutamax-1 (or glutamine) 2 ml Gentamicin or antibiotic-antimycotic 200 ~,1 JUST BEFORE USE, ADD:
Aprotinin 0.14 TIU 0.07TIU
Hydrocortisone (4 mM - 1.45 mg/ml, 10 ~,1 200 nM
MW = 362.5) Putrescine (100mM - 16.11 mg/ml, 200 ~1 100 ~,m MW = 161.1) Progesterone (200 ~,M - 0.0629 mg/ml, 20 ~.l 20nM
MW = 314.5) Retinol Acetate, H20 soluble (5 mM - 20.4 mg/ml) 400 ~l 10 nM
EGF ( 10 ~.g/ml ) 2 0 ~.1 1 ng/ml bFGF 50ng/ml SOD (5 mg/ml - 9 mg in 1.8 ml) 50,1 1. Make up 1X DMEM medium.
2. Add dextran, Albumax, ITS, sodium heparin, Glutamax and chondroitin C. If necessary, warm gently to dissolve reagents. Filter sterilize.
3. Just before use, add remaining constituents using filter sterilized 1000X stock solutions. (Keep retinol acetate protected from lfight.) 4. Dilute with 1:1 with 1X DMEM (without anything added).
NB. Modifications of the medium by additioa/removal of components allov~s adaptation for culture of other human and aafaial cells and cell lines.
For 100m1 Final Conc.
DMEM 94 ml Insulin-transferrin-selenium 2 ml 1~
Dextran 2 g 3 mg/ml Albumax 0.6 g 3 mg/ml Chondroitin Sulphate C 2.7 g (1.350 Sodium heparin 0.018 g Glutamax-1 (or glutamine) 2 ml Gentamicin or antibiotic-antimycotic 200 ~,1 JUST BEFORE USE, ADD:
Aprotinin 0.14 TIU 0.07TIU
Hydrocortisone (4 mM - 1.45 mg/ml, 10 ~,1 200 nM
MW = 362.5) Putrescine (100mM - 16.11 mg/ml, 200 ~1 100 ~,m MW = 161.1) Progesterone (200 ~,M - 0.0629 mg/ml, 20 ~.l 20nM
MW = 314.5) Retinol Acetate, H20 soluble (5 mM - 20.4 mg/ml) 400 ~l 10 nM
EGF ( 10 ~.g/ml ) 2 0 ~.1 1 ng/ml bFGF 50ng/ml SOD (5 mg/ml - 9 mg in 1.8 ml) 50,1 1. Make up 1X DMEM medium.
2. Add dextran, Albumax, ITS, sodium heparin, Glutamax and chondroitin C. If necessary, warm gently to dissolve reagents. Filter sterilize.
3. Just before use, add remaining constituents using filter sterilized 1000X stock solutions. (Keep retinol acetate protected from lfight.) 4. Dilute with 1:1 with 1X DMEM (without anything added).
NB. Modifications of the medium by additioa/removal of components allov~s adaptation for culture of other human and aafaial cells and cell lines.
After the epithelial cells attained confluence, the medium on top of the cornea was removed to create an air-liquid interface. Cell lines that were able to form a 5-layered cornea resembling the human cornea were expanded for use in the corneal-sclera reconstructions.
An alternative method used is to coat the insert with a collagen or fibrin matrix and then seed the epithelial cells, followed by the stroma after epithelial confluence and then the endothelium. Bowman's membrane and/or Descemet's membrane are applied after constructing the epithelial layer and stromal layer, respectively. Air-liquid interface is achieved by withdrawing medium from around the insert and allowing the epithelium to stratify, while maintaining the media supply to the construct from within the insert. This method is preferred when culture time is a factor, because epithelial confluence can be achieved in 1 to 3 days, depending on seeding density, instead of 1 week. Stromal and endothelial cell growth occur concurrently with epithelial stratification.
Serum-free Medium The above serum-free medium is also able to sustain whole post-mortem corneas in organ culture for at least three weeks and maintain cells in monolayer cultures.
Whole human corneas are traditionally cultured using a submerged culture method that causes swelling, loss of epithelial stratification and other undesirable artifacts. In 1991, Richard and co-investigators reported the successful mostly artifact-free culture of human corneas at an air-liquid interface. While this method worked well with corneas with large attached scleral rims, it was not giving consistently good results with eye bank corneas and corneas harvested for research that had very little scleral rim. In addition, the quality of the results varied with the skill level of the individual performing the culture. A method was therefore devised for organ culturing whole human corneas based on the Richard air-liquid interface culture conditions that would produce consistently good results thereby eliminating the culture method as a variable in studies of corneal wound healing.
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is a technique whereby the excimer laser is used to correct refractive errors in S eyesight such as myopia, astigmatism and hyperopia by reshaping the front of the cornea. For myopia treatment, the higher the refractive error to be corrected, the deeper the ablation into the cornea. Problems generally arise when the laser ablation extends into the stroma, and in particular, beyond the anterior one-third of the stroma. Scarring, perceived as hazing which obscures vision, is the major complication following PRK with deep ablations into the stroma (Assil and Quantock, 1993). Results to date indicate that deeper stromal ablations of 150-190 ~.m for corrections of -11 to -20 dopters (D) have resulted in scarring, and in some practices, up to an incidence of 47~ (Heitzmann et a1. 1993) .
The high myopes who have very poor vision, however, are the group of patients for whom excimer laser surgery would be of most benefit, as it would potentially greatly improve their quality of life.
Present wound healing studies have therefore been targeted towards understanding and preventing scarring problems during corneal stromal wound healing.
Due to the morphological and physiological differences in the corneas of animals such as rabbits and humans, human corneas were preferably used in the present studies. Because of this, an in vitro organ model was developed for maintaining the experimental corneas that would simulate the in vivo conditions as much as possible.
Human corneas have traditionally been cultured as submerged cultures, according to the procedure developed by Doughman, 1980. In this procedure, the corneas are inverted, with the epithelium at the bottom and the endothelium close to the level of the medium-air interface. However, while cultures remain viable for up to three weeks, stromal edema is often seen. In addition, epithelial thinning has been observed.
In 1991, Richard et a1. reported the successful organ culture of whole human corneas using a method whereby the corneas were maintained at an air-liquid interface for 21 days. Culturing at an air-liquid interface eliminated the 5 problems seen with the submerged cultures. In 1993, the group published the organ culture of human corneas in a serum-free medium containing Vitamin A (retinol), allowing for investigations to be carried out on whole corneas (Andersen et al. 1993).
10 The method described by Richard et al. (1991) and subsequently used in the group's other studies (Andersen et al., 1993, 1996; Colin et al. 1995) has corneas sitting on top of a Telfon ring that is attached to one side of a culture dish with wax. The corneas were stabilized on the Teflon 15 rings by the curvature of the anterior surface of the eye and the 3-4 mm sclera rings left around the cornea. This method worked for corneas that were removed from whole globes but eye bank corneas and those harvested for research often did not have such a wide scleral rim and did not remain on the rings.
20 In addition, results obtained depended upon the skills of the person performing the culture as the entire endothelial surface may not be in contact with medium due to air bubbles that were trapped under the curvature of the cornea during change from the up to down cycles of the rocker used in the 25 protocol.
Therefore, the present method allows whole corneas to be cultured easily with consistently good results. Both a medium with serum and, preferably, a serum-free medium were used to culture whole human corneas for up to four weeks. In the present study, we examined the wound healing of human corneas in vitro, using our culture system. The corneas were subjected to excimer laser treatment that is identical to what was used and is still used in some centres for the correction of high myopia.
Cultureware Materials needed include 100 x 25 mm petri or tissue culture dishes or preferable, square and rectangular dishes such as those manufactured by Nunc (Nalg Nunc International, Naperville, IL). The deeper the dish, the better. We have also used autoclavable plastic rings on "legs" to allow media exchange, to hold the cornea in place (Figure 19A), but this is not necessary for corneas that can be harvested with a seleral rim of at least 3-4 mm.
Organ Culture Medium Both Medium 199 (Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS, Becton-Dickinson) and antibiotics such as 0.1% gentamicin, and a serum-free medium (Table 1) were used. One percent (1%) agar in complete medium, either with or without serum was used to mimic the aqueous humor of the eye in providing nutrients to the cornea as well as to hold the corneas in place throughout the culture period.
Corneas Twelve pairs of human corneas with no corneal pathology removed from globes that were collected within 48 hours post-mortem were organ cultured for 21 days in serum-free medium. An additional six pairs of corneas were cultured in medium containing serum for up to four weeks. The age of the donors ranged from 6 months to 80 years, but the majority were within the 18 to 80 year range.
One cornea from each pair was treated with the VisX Star 2020C excimer laser to create a wound of 6 mm diameter. The ablations performed were at -12.00 D using a single pass algorithm. This was a high myopic treatment that removed the epithelium and stroma to a depth of 180-190 Vim.
Organ Culture Two plastic rings were placed in diagonally opposing corneas of a square culture dish (Figure 19A). If a round dish is used, the rings should be kept apart. Sterile melted wax was used to adhere the rings by the legs to the dishes.
An alternative method used is to coat the insert with a collagen or fibrin matrix and then seed the epithelial cells, followed by the stroma after epithelial confluence and then the endothelium. Bowman's membrane and/or Descemet's membrane are applied after constructing the epithelial layer and stromal layer, respectively. Air-liquid interface is achieved by withdrawing medium from around the insert and allowing the epithelium to stratify, while maintaining the media supply to the construct from within the insert. This method is preferred when culture time is a factor, because epithelial confluence can be achieved in 1 to 3 days, depending on seeding density, instead of 1 week. Stromal and endothelial cell growth occur concurrently with epithelial stratification.
Serum-free Medium The above serum-free medium is also able to sustain whole post-mortem corneas in organ culture for at least three weeks and maintain cells in monolayer cultures.
Whole human corneas are traditionally cultured using a submerged culture method that causes swelling, loss of epithelial stratification and other undesirable artifacts. In 1991, Richard and co-investigators reported the successful mostly artifact-free culture of human corneas at an air-liquid interface. While this method worked well with corneas with large attached scleral rims, it was not giving consistently good results with eye bank corneas and corneas harvested for research that had very little scleral rim. In addition, the quality of the results varied with the skill level of the individual performing the culture. A method was therefore devised for organ culturing whole human corneas based on the Richard air-liquid interface culture conditions that would produce consistently good results thereby eliminating the culture method as a variable in studies of corneal wound healing.
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is a technique whereby the excimer laser is used to correct refractive errors in S eyesight such as myopia, astigmatism and hyperopia by reshaping the front of the cornea. For myopia treatment, the higher the refractive error to be corrected, the deeper the ablation into the cornea. Problems generally arise when the laser ablation extends into the stroma, and in particular, beyond the anterior one-third of the stroma. Scarring, perceived as hazing which obscures vision, is the major complication following PRK with deep ablations into the stroma (Assil and Quantock, 1993). Results to date indicate that deeper stromal ablations of 150-190 ~.m for corrections of -11 to -20 dopters (D) have resulted in scarring, and in some practices, up to an incidence of 47~ (Heitzmann et a1. 1993) .
The high myopes who have very poor vision, however, are the group of patients for whom excimer laser surgery would be of most benefit, as it would potentially greatly improve their quality of life.
Present wound healing studies have therefore been targeted towards understanding and preventing scarring problems during corneal stromal wound healing.
Due to the morphological and physiological differences in the corneas of animals such as rabbits and humans, human corneas were preferably used in the present studies. Because of this, an in vitro organ model was developed for maintaining the experimental corneas that would simulate the in vivo conditions as much as possible.
Human corneas have traditionally been cultured as submerged cultures, according to the procedure developed by Doughman, 1980. In this procedure, the corneas are inverted, with the epithelium at the bottom and the endothelium close to the level of the medium-air interface. However, while cultures remain viable for up to three weeks, stromal edema is often seen. In addition, epithelial thinning has been observed.
In 1991, Richard et a1. reported the successful organ culture of whole human corneas using a method whereby the corneas were maintained at an air-liquid interface for 21 days. Culturing at an air-liquid interface eliminated the 5 problems seen with the submerged cultures. In 1993, the group published the organ culture of human corneas in a serum-free medium containing Vitamin A (retinol), allowing for investigations to be carried out on whole corneas (Andersen et al. 1993).
10 The method described by Richard et al. (1991) and subsequently used in the group's other studies (Andersen et al., 1993, 1996; Colin et al. 1995) has corneas sitting on top of a Telfon ring that is attached to one side of a culture dish with wax. The corneas were stabilized on the Teflon 15 rings by the curvature of the anterior surface of the eye and the 3-4 mm sclera rings left around the cornea. This method worked for corneas that were removed from whole globes but eye bank corneas and those harvested for research often did not have such a wide scleral rim and did not remain on the rings.
20 In addition, results obtained depended upon the skills of the person performing the culture as the entire endothelial surface may not be in contact with medium due to air bubbles that were trapped under the curvature of the cornea during change from the up to down cycles of the rocker used in the 25 protocol.
Therefore, the present method allows whole corneas to be cultured easily with consistently good results. Both a medium with serum and, preferably, a serum-free medium were used to culture whole human corneas for up to four weeks. In the present study, we examined the wound healing of human corneas in vitro, using our culture system. The corneas were subjected to excimer laser treatment that is identical to what was used and is still used in some centres for the correction of high myopia.
Cultureware Materials needed include 100 x 25 mm petri or tissue culture dishes or preferable, square and rectangular dishes such as those manufactured by Nunc (Nalg Nunc International, Naperville, IL). The deeper the dish, the better. We have also used autoclavable plastic rings on "legs" to allow media exchange, to hold the cornea in place (Figure 19A), but this is not necessary for corneas that can be harvested with a seleral rim of at least 3-4 mm.
Organ Culture Medium Both Medium 199 (Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS, Becton-Dickinson) and antibiotics such as 0.1% gentamicin, and a serum-free medium (Table 1) were used. One percent (1%) agar in complete medium, either with or without serum was used to mimic the aqueous humor of the eye in providing nutrients to the cornea as well as to hold the corneas in place throughout the culture period.
Corneas Twelve pairs of human corneas with no corneal pathology removed from globes that were collected within 48 hours post-mortem were organ cultured for 21 days in serum-free medium. An additional six pairs of corneas were cultured in medium containing serum for up to four weeks. The age of the donors ranged from 6 months to 80 years, but the majority were within the 18 to 80 year range.
One cornea from each pair was treated with the VisX Star 2020C excimer laser to create a wound of 6 mm diameter. The ablations performed were at -12.00 D using a single pass algorithm. This was a high myopic treatment that removed the epithelium and stroma to a depth of 180-190 Vim.
Organ Culture Two plastic rings were placed in diagonally opposing corneas of a square culture dish (Figure 19A). If a round dish is used, the rings should be kept apart. Sterile melted wax was used to adhere the rings by the legs to the dishes.
However, as mentioned above, corneas may be without the rings if they have sufficient scleral ring to stabilize them on top of the agar.
About 10 ml of melted liquid agar (a 2% agar w/v agar S mixture in medium only was pre-made and stored in a Pyrex or other boiling resistant glass bottle at 4°C. When needed, the bottle was placed on a hot plate and the agar melted. The hot agar was then diluted with a 2X medium and was poured into each dish, making sure that the legs of the plastic rings were sealed in. Additional agar was pre-poured into the concave wells of depression dishes. These formed convex mounds that were placed within each plastic ring and sealed into place with melted agar. These formed the supports for the curved corneas and should conform to curvature of the cornea. (When rabbit corneas, which have a much greater curvature than human corneas, were organ cultured, we had to double up the mounds to support the cornea).
Medium was added to the culture plates just prior to use.
The pairs of corneas were placed on the agar mounds at either end of the dish, with the endothelial surface resting on the agar (Figure 19B). The dishes were labelled to distinguish between the two corneas. Each dish was then placed on a rocker (Figure 19C) with an angle of 7 to 10° that would rock the dish at 10 cycles per minute (Richard et al. 1991). The amount of media used (8-12 ml) was just enough to cover one cornea at the down cycle. The cultures were maintained in a humidified environment at 37°C with 5% COZ and 95% air. The rocking and intermittent flow of medium over the cornea simulates "blinking".
Coraeal Evaluatioa Corneas were bisected and fixed at times 0, 1, 5, 10 days and 3 weeks after PRK treatment. Half of each cornea was processed for paraffin embedding and H&E-stained for routine light microscopical histopathological examination. The other half was either dehydrated through an alcohol series, critical point-dried and sputter-coated for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and then re-embedded for transmission electron microscopy (TEM); or directly processed for resin-embedding in Spurr's resin and TEM observation. SEM
micrographs were taken on a JEOL JSM 6400 scanning electron microscope. For TEM, the resin-embedded samples were thin sectioned and stained with lead citrate for visualization with a Philips 420 transmission electron microscope..
Human corneas cultured as described showed uniformed stratified squamous epithelia of four to six layers for up to three weeks (Figure 20A). We have found that corneas retrieved within 24 of death had 5-6 layers while the ones retrieved closer to 48 hours showed 4-5 layers. The endothelial layer was also intact (Figure 19B). At four weeks, the epithelial layer was thinner, with only two to four layers. However, TEM micrographs showed that the cells had electron lucent nuclei, organelles, functional complexes and characteristic microplicae (Figure 20). Culture artifacts were present but the ultrastructural observations suggested that the cells were still healthy. The use of an antioxidant, such as superoxide dismutase and a protease inhibitor, such as aprotinin (Table 1) has allowed extension of the culture period of the corneas by about one week (from three to four weeks ) .
Corneas were treated to a depth of about 180 - 190 ~.m, which was over one-third the corneal thickness (cornea is about 500~m in the central zone) showed healing in culture.
SEM showed a smooth ablation surface after the procedure with no epithelial cells. By 5 days post-treatment, however, there was epithelial ingrowth. By 10 days, there was re-stratification (Figure 21). Re-stratification occurred even in samples where the stroma showed edema. Edema within the stroma is frequently observed after deep laser ablations.
At 10 and 21 days post treatment, the epithelial surfaces were showing confluence and the treated areas were indistinguishable from the untreated regions (Figure 22).
These corneas were maintained in serum-free medium.
Organ culture of the human cornea is used in research and, in Europe, as a means of extending the lifespan of the human cornea for transplantation purposes, after the death of the donor. The traditional submerged culture method of maintaining corneas has several drawbacks, such as the thinning of the epithelium, development of edema within the stroma and subsequent swelling. These changes in the cornea makes it difficult to correlate the results of in vitro experimental procedures on the corneas, with the actual in vivo situation due to the distortion of the cornea.
The first reported major breakthrough in the organ culture of human corneas was the work of Richards et al.
(1991). These investigators cultured human corneas at an air-liquid interface. This eliminates the culture artifacts of the submerged culture system.
The use of the air-liquid interface culture system has also shown superior results compared to the submerged culture systems and, in the main, has worked for other organs.
Palates have been successfully cultured from mouse embryos and fused in vitro, and have been found to undergo osteogenesis in the presence of a 50% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide and 45%
nitrogen gas mixture (Griffith and Hay, 1992). Palates grown in submerged systems developed cartilage, presumably due to the lower oxygen content in the medium. Culture artifacts and some swelling were also present.
The present application describes a simple method for obtaining consistent results in the organ culture of whole corneas. A 1% agar-medium gel was used to support the cornea while providing an environment for constant nutrient -metabolic product exchange through the endothelial layer, even when the epithelium is completely exposed to air during an up-cycle on the rocker. The use of the agar support eliminates the possibility of endothelial exposure to air, and mimics the aqueous and vitreous humor of the eye. The serum-free defined medium permits control of experimental conditions. The elimination of serum eliminates the presence of unknown serum proteins such as cytokines that will have effects on wound healing. The various components of the serum-free medium, including an antioxidant and a protease inhibitor, allow the healing of deep wounds to more than one-third the thickness of the cornea (as caused in this study by ablation with the excimer laser). The re-epithelialized surface was S morphologically similar to untreated surfaces.
The use of serum-free medium allows for more complete characterization of the experiemental conditions.
Furthermore, the use of a semi-solid gel support allows constant exchange of nutrients, metabolic products during the 10 entire culture period and hence provides consistently good culture results. The present system was able to maintain the corneas as well as allow for the healing of deep corneal stromal wounds. This model can also be used for the study of the modulation of corneal stromal healing.
15 vascular endothelial cell lines Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were harvested from umbilical cord veins as previously described (Sirois E, et al., Int. J. Artificial Organs 16:609-619, 1993). They were grown on a gelatin-coated dish until 20 confluence in Medium 199 supplemented with 20% FBS, 90 mg/1 of heparin, 2 mM of L-glutamine and 100 ~,g/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (EGGS). Penicillin (100 I.U./ml), streptomycin sulfate (100ug/ml) and amphotericin B (0.25~.g/ml) were present in medium. After the first passage, FBS
25 concentration was reduced to 10% and ECGS to 20 ~,g/ml. Cells were subcultured at a ratio of 1:3 or 1:4 and HUVECs from the 2nd to 4th passages were used in our bioassays. Endothelial cell phenotype was verified by the diI-acetylated low-density lipoprotein (diI-Ac-LDL) uptake and positivity to factor VIII-30 related antigen antibodies by immunocytochemistry. Cultures were incubated in 5% COZ atmosphere at 37°C in saturated humidity. The medium was changed every other day.
For transfection, primary HUVECs were seeded onto uncoated 60 mm tissue culture plates and cultured until 60-70% confluent. They were then immortalized by infection with the HPV16 E6 and E7 genes and selected by 6418 resistance as described above.
The virally transfected HUVECs were tested for functionality by their ability to undergo angiogenesis in a three-dimensional fibrin-containing matrix (Figure 16); and their ability to sequester acetylated low density lipoprotein labelled with 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI-Ac-LDL;
Biomed. Technol. Inc., Stoughton, MA), (Figures 17 and 18).
Immortalized HUVECs can also be maintained in the serum-free medium. Similarities and differences between primary and immortalized HUVECs are summarized in Table 2. As with corneal cell lines, other genes can also be introduced into HUVEC lines. For example, GFP has been introduced by transfection.
About 10 ml of melted liquid agar (a 2% agar w/v agar S mixture in medium only was pre-made and stored in a Pyrex or other boiling resistant glass bottle at 4°C. When needed, the bottle was placed on a hot plate and the agar melted. The hot agar was then diluted with a 2X medium and was poured into each dish, making sure that the legs of the plastic rings were sealed in. Additional agar was pre-poured into the concave wells of depression dishes. These formed convex mounds that were placed within each plastic ring and sealed into place with melted agar. These formed the supports for the curved corneas and should conform to curvature of the cornea. (When rabbit corneas, which have a much greater curvature than human corneas, were organ cultured, we had to double up the mounds to support the cornea).
Medium was added to the culture plates just prior to use.
The pairs of corneas were placed on the agar mounds at either end of the dish, with the endothelial surface resting on the agar (Figure 19B). The dishes were labelled to distinguish between the two corneas. Each dish was then placed on a rocker (Figure 19C) with an angle of 7 to 10° that would rock the dish at 10 cycles per minute (Richard et al. 1991). The amount of media used (8-12 ml) was just enough to cover one cornea at the down cycle. The cultures were maintained in a humidified environment at 37°C with 5% COZ and 95% air. The rocking and intermittent flow of medium over the cornea simulates "blinking".
Coraeal Evaluatioa Corneas were bisected and fixed at times 0, 1, 5, 10 days and 3 weeks after PRK treatment. Half of each cornea was processed for paraffin embedding and H&E-stained for routine light microscopical histopathological examination. The other half was either dehydrated through an alcohol series, critical point-dried and sputter-coated for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and then re-embedded for transmission electron microscopy (TEM); or directly processed for resin-embedding in Spurr's resin and TEM observation. SEM
micrographs were taken on a JEOL JSM 6400 scanning electron microscope. For TEM, the resin-embedded samples were thin sectioned and stained with lead citrate for visualization with a Philips 420 transmission electron microscope..
Human corneas cultured as described showed uniformed stratified squamous epithelia of four to six layers for up to three weeks (Figure 20A). We have found that corneas retrieved within 24 of death had 5-6 layers while the ones retrieved closer to 48 hours showed 4-5 layers. The endothelial layer was also intact (Figure 19B). At four weeks, the epithelial layer was thinner, with only two to four layers. However, TEM micrographs showed that the cells had electron lucent nuclei, organelles, functional complexes and characteristic microplicae (Figure 20). Culture artifacts were present but the ultrastructural observations suggested that the cells were still healthy. The use of an antioxidant, such as superoxide dismutase and a protease inhibitor, such as aprotinin (Table 1) has allowed extension of the culture period of the corneas by about one week (from three to four weeks ) .
Corneas were treated to a depth of about 180 - 190 ~.m, which was over one-third the corneal thickness (cornea is about 500~m in the central zone) showed healing in culture.
SEM showed a smooth ablation surface after the procedure with no epithelial cells. By 5 days post-treatment, however, there was epithelial ingrowth. By 10 days, there was re-stratification (Figure 21). Re-stratification occurred even in samples where the stroma showed edema. Edema within the stroma is frequently observed after deep laser ablations.
At 10 and 21 days post treatment, the epithelial surfaces were showing confluence and the treated areas were indistinguishable from the untreated regions (Figure 22).
These corneas were maintained in serum-free medium.
Organ culture of the human cornea is used in research and, in Europe, as a means of extending the lifespan of the human cornea for transplantation purposes, after the death of the donor. The traditional submerged culture method of maintaining corneas has several drawbacks, such as the thinning of the epithelium, development of edema within the stroma and subsequent swelling. These changes in the cornea makes it difficult to correlate the results of in vitro experimental procedures on the corneas, with the actual in vivo situation due to the distortion of the cornea.
The first reported major breakthrough in the organ culture of human corneas was the work of Richards et al.
(1991). These investigators cultured human corneas at an air-liquid interface. This eliminates the culture artifacts of the submerged culture system.
The use of the air-liquid interface culture system has also shown superior results compared to the submerged culture systems and, in the main, has worked for other organs.
Palates have been successfully cultured from mouse embryos and fused in vitro, and have been found to undergo osteogenesis in the presence of a 50% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide and 45%
nitrogen gas mixture (Griffith and Hay, 1992). Palates grown in submerged systems developed cartilage, presumably due to the lower oxygen content in the medium. Culture artifacts and some swelling were also present.
The present application describes a simple method for obtaining consistent results in the organ culture of whole corneas. A 1% agar-medium gel was used to support the cornea while providing an environment for constant nutrient -metabolic product exchange through the endothelial layer, even when the epithelium is completely exposed to air during an up-cycle on the rocker. The use of the agar support eliminates the possibility of endothelial exposure to air, and mimics the aqueous and vitreous humor of the eye. The serum-free defined medium permits control of experimental conditions. The elimination of serum eliminates the presence of unknown serum proteins such as cytokines that will have effects on wound healing. The various components of the serum-free medium, including an antioxidant and a protease inhibitor, allow the healing of deep wounds to more than one-third the thickness of the cornea (as caused in this study by ablation with the excimer laser). The re-epithelialized surface was S morphologically similar to untreated surfaces.
The use of serum-free medium allows for more complete characterization of the experiemental conditions.
Furthermore, the use of a semi-solid gel support allows constant exchange of nutrients, metabolic products during the 10 entire culture period and hence provides consistently good culture results. The present system was able to maintain the corneas as well as allow for the healing of deep corneal stromal wounds. This model can also be used for the study of the modulation of corneal stromal healing.
15 vascular endothelial cell lines Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were harvested from umbilical cord veins as previously described (Sirois E, et al., Int. J. Artificial Organs 16:609-619, 1993). They were grown on a gelatin-coated dish until 20 confluence in Medium 199 supplemented with 20% FBS, 90 mg/1 of heparin, 2 mM of L-glutamine and 100 ~,g/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (EGGS). Penicillin (100 I.U./ml), streptomycin sulfate (100ug/ml) and amphotericin B (0.25~.g/ml) were present in medium. After the first passage, FBS
25 concentration was reduced to 10% and ECGS to 20 ~,g/ml. Cells were subcultured at a ratio of 1:3 or 1:4 and HUVECs from the 2nd to 4th passages were used in our bioassays. Endothelial cell phenotype was verified by the diI-acetylated low-density lipoprotein (diI-Ac-LDL) uptake and positivity to factor VIII-30 related antigen antibodies by immunocytochemistry. Cultures were incubated in 5% COZ atmosphere at 37°C in saturated humidity. The medium was changed every other day.
For transfection, primary HUVECs were seeded onto uncoated 60 mm tissue culture plates and cultured until 60-70% confluent. They were then immortalized by infection with the HPV16 E6 and E7 genes and selected by 6418 resistance as described above.
The virally transfected HUVECs were tested for functionality by their ability to undergo angiogenesis in a three-dimensional fibrin-containing matrix (Figure 16); and their ability to sequester acetylated low density lipoprotein labelled with 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI-Ac-LDL;
Biomed. Technol. Inc., Stoughton, MA), (Figures 17 and 18).
Immortalized HUVECs can also be maintained in the serum-free medium. Similarities and differences between primary and immortalized HUVECs are summarized in Table 2. As with corneal cell lines, other genes can also be introduced into HUVEC lines. For example, GFP has been introduced by transfection.
v v x x .r., .r., ~ ~ o ~
ai o U rtS cW
m n ri r-1 N N
r-1 r~
~ t -ri -rl O O
e-1 b + + U U ~
U
N 'd 'L3 N
N N
+
N
v O
U U
.~ .~
~ ~ ~ + ~ N
N .t~ t~ - + ~
N N
U ~ tn .u z + + U
,~ U~
,.~
.,i b G i ~ o N jr ~
o ,Sr S-1 S-1 N
Lfl ~-I ~ fa" ~j"
fa .4~ r1 r~
U r-1 r-I
ffl U7 -~ -~ v -., v s~ c~ s~
~ -~
~ ~
r-I U .1 U ~
1 ,i,'' ,.C, U J.
+ + rn rn ~ v ~ ~
r v , - +
d b '~ '~ ~
'~ '~
.u ~ ~ n a . rn b ' ~ ~ ~ -~ ~
~
S 4' x O .('', bl ri -I O ' ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~
z , ~
U
O
O O ~T1 x U
4a N
bl r~ td A ~
. O
'a O U
cd H
N
N
4a O ~ O
~
~ . O
w 4 A t0 U
i~.l td rn w x cd f~ ~ N ~ 1.1 ilk ri O
O ~
N
U1 (d J-1 N
v N U~ E
N ~ W ZT1 .~,' ~r \ w l~
w 'L3 ri Z71 'd UI w ii O
N N ~ N C7 O
O m ~ U W GY.w ~
U v Ea Reconstruction of the coraea and sclera The cornea complete with a surrounding sclera can be reconstructed in a variety of ways, using a range of cellular concentrations. Described below are two methods that have been optimised:
Me thod 1:
(Summarized in Figure 2a) As for the cornea alone, preferably either Costar transwell inserts that are pre-coated with type I and type III
collagen, or collagen-coated Milllicell-CM (Millipore) culture inserts were used. A circular piece of agar or fibrin gel was placed in the centre of the culture insert and HUVECs were seeded at a density of 5 x 104 cells per ml and allowed to grow to confluence, supplemented by culture medium that had 0.09 g/1 heparin, 0.02 mg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS, Becton Dickinson).
Stromal and endothelial samples were simultaneously prepared and timed to have contracted at the same time as the HUVECs reach confluence. Stromal samples comprise keratocytes embedded in a collagen-chondroitin sulphate matrix as described previously. Retinol acetate was added to the stromal matrix to prevent contraction of the gel. Descemet's membrane was laid down on top of the stromal matrix and endothelial cells were seeded onto this membrane at 103 cells/ml. When the HWECs attained confluence, the agar or fibrin gel was removed and the stroma and endothelial compartments were placed in the centre of the dish with the endothelial cells at the bottom.
The sclera, which was a combination of 105 to 10'vascular endothelial cells in a 0.3% to 1% fibrinogen (optimal is 0.3%) (fraction I; type I-S from bovine plasma (human fibrinogen can also be substituted)), 0.2% -1% (optimal is 0.25%) gelatin matrix, polymerized by addition of thrombin (various doses can be used, higher doses give a firmer gel) was then poured around the stroma and allowed to set. Bowman's membrane was then layered on top as described above and finally, epithelial cells were seeded on top of Bowman's membrane.
ai o U rtS cW
m n ri r-1 N N
r-1 r~
~ t -ri -rl O O
e-1 b + + U U ~
U
N 'd 'L3 N
N N
+
N
v O
U U
.~ .~
~ ~ ~ + ~ N
N .t~ t~ - + ~
N N
U ~ tn .u z + + U
,~ U~
,.~
.,i b G i ~ o N jr ~
o ,Sr S-1 S-1 N
Lfl ~-I ~ fa" ~j"
fa .4~ r1 r~
U r-1 r-I
ffl U7 -~ -~ v -., v s~ c~ s~
~ -~
~ ~
r-I U .1 U ~
1 ,i,'' ,.C, U J.
+ + rn rn ~ v ~ ~
r v , - +
d b '~ '~ ~
'~ '~
.u ~ ~ n a . rn b ' ~ ~ ~ -~ ~
~
S 4' x O .('', bl ri -I O ' ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~
z , ~
U
O
O O ~T1 x U
4a N
bl r~ td A ~
. O
'a O U
cd H
N
N
4a O ~ O
~
~ . O
w 4 A t0 U
i~.l td rn w x cd f~ ~ N ~ 1.1 ilk ri O
O ~
N
U1 (d J-1 N
v N U~ E
N ~ W ZT1 .~,' ~r \ w l~
w 'L3 ri Z71 'd UI w ii O
N N ~ N C7 O
O m ~ U W GY.w ~
U v Ea Reconstruction of the coraea and sclera The cornea complete with a surrounding sclera can be reconstructed in a variety of ways, using a range of cellular concentrations. Described below are two methods that have been optimised:
Me thod 1:
(Summarized in Figure 2a) As for the cornea alone, preferably either Costar transwell inserts that are pre-coated with type I and type III
collagen, or collagen-coated Milllicell-CM (Millipore) culture inserts were used. A circular piece of agar or fibrin gel was placed in the centre of the culture insert and HUVECs were seeded at a density of 5 x 104 cells per ml and allowed to grow to confluence, supplemented by culture medium that had 0.09 g/1 heparin, 0.02 mg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS, Becton Dickinson).
Stromal and endothelial samples were simultaneously prepared and timed to have contracted at the same time as the HUVECs reach confluence. Stromal samples comprise keratocytes embedded in a collagen-chondroitin sulphate matrix as described previously. Retinol acetate was added to the stromal matrix to prevent contraction of the gel. Descemet's membrane was laid down on top of the stromal matrix and endothelial cells were seeded onto this membrane at 103 cells/ml. When the HWECs attained confluence, the agar or fibrin gel was removed and the stroma and endothelial compartments were placed in the centre of the dish with the endothelial cells at the bottom.
The sclera, which was a combination of 105 to 10'vascular endothelial cells in a 0.3% to 1% fibrinogen (optimal is 0.3%) (fraction I; type I-S from bovine plasma (human fibrinogen can also be substituted)), 0.2% -1% (optimal is 0.25%) gelatin matrix, polymerized by addition of thrombin (various doses can be used, higher doses give a firmer gel) was then poured around the stroma and allowed to set. Bowman's membrane was then layered on top as described above and finally, epithelial cells were seeded on top of Bowman's membrane.
Method 2:
(Summarized in Figure 2b) Epithelial cells are plated on a collagen coated insert and grown until confluence is achieved. Tnserts can also be coated with 0.3~ fibrinogen to allow for epithelial stratification. A Bowman's membrane is then applied on the epithelial layer. The insert membrane can also be used as a "pseudo-Bowman's membrane" by infiltrating with collagen and seeding the epithelial cells onto the underside of an inverted insert (Figure 2b) and growing the cells until confluence, after which the insert is returned to its regular position.
The stroma which had been fabricated separately as described in "Method One" is placed on top of the epithelial layer and surrounded with HUVEC cells (105 to 10' cells/ml matrix) in the fibrinogen matrix. Descemet's membrane is layered on top of the stroma and HUVEC/fibrinogen matrix. Endothelial cells are then seeded on top. The inside of the insert is then supplemented with medium while the epithelial layer is left to grow at a liquid-air interface. This method reduces the culture time by up to one week (or the time required for the epithelial cells to achieve confluence on top of "Bowman's membrane").
During the assays in matrices, cells were grown in serum (10~) supplemented-medium 199 containing heparin, L-glutamine or modified glutamine such as L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine (GlutaMAXz''', GIBCO) and antibiotics at the same concentration as described above, without ECGS, but with 50 ng/ml of FGF-2. Serum-free medium has also been used.
Recoastructioa Protocol with Epithelium Down Steps are reversed for constructs that have endothelium at the bottom of the insert and epithelium, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is laid down between the stroma and underlying layer (epi or endo) to prevent downward cell invasion).
All components are either purchased sterile or sterilized (eg. with a 0.2 ~.m filter). A base medium, such as M199 or DMEM (no phenol red) with serum or serum-free, is used.
Epithelium Biocoat'I''' (Becton-Dickinson) collagen-coated 30 mm inserts or collagen-coated Falcon or Millipore-CM inserts may be used.
Inserts can also be coated with 0.3~ fibrinogen.
5 Epithelial cells are trypsinised and spun down, followed by resuspension in 0.5 ml of medium. Cells are then counted, e.g. with a haemocytometer.
Inserts are then seeded with about 5 to 7.5x10' cells/insert.
10 The inserts are supplemented with 2 ml of medium inside the insert, as well as on the outside.
Cells are then grown until confluence is reached.
Bowman's Membrane After epithelial cells have reached confluence, the 15 matrix is prepared as follows by mixing together gently but well (avoid forming bubbles) collagen, Type I, bovine dermal (3.3 mg/ml; 6 ml) and collagen buffer, lOX (see below; 0.6 ml). The resulting mixture is neutralised with 1 N NaOH, if needed.
20 Then, 100 ~.1 fibronectin (1mg/ml stock) is added and the resulting solution mixed well. All medium is then aspirated from the epithelium within the insert. The Bowman's membrane is layered on and allow to set. The inserts should not be moved during the setting process.
25 Once the Bowman's membrane has set (or preferably, just before it is completely set), PEG is layered on as follows.
10~ PEG in medium only is added on top of Bowman's membrane.
It is then left to sit for 30 min-1 hour in an incubator to form a thin coating over the Bowman's membrane. The solution 30 is aspirated off completely just before adding the stroma. It has been possible to incorporate the PEG into Bowman's membrane directly, instead of this additional step.
Stroma The following components are mixed together in the stated 35 order, mixing gently but very well at each step:
(Summarized in Figure 2b) Epithelial cells are plated on a collagen coated insert and grown until confluence is achieved. Tnserts can also be coated with 0.3~ fibrinogen to allow for epithelial stratification. A Bowman's membrane is then applied on the epithelial layer. The insert membrane can also be used as a "pseudo-Bowman's membrane" by infiltrating with collagen and seeding the epithelial cells onto the underside of an inverted insert (Figure 2b) and growing the cells until confluence, after which the insert is returned to its regular position.
The stroma which had been fabricated separately as described in "Method One" is placed on top of the epithelial layer and surrounded with HUVEC cells (105 to 10' cells/ml matrix) in the fibrinogen matrix. Descemet's membrane is layered on top of the stroma and HUVEC/fibrinogen matrix. Endothelial cells are then seeded on top. The inside of the insert is then supplemented with medium while the epithelial layer is left to grow at a liquid-air interface. This method reduces the culture time by up to one week (or the time required for the epithelial cells to achieve confluence on top of "Bowman's membrane").
During the assays in matrices, cells were grown in serum (10~) supplemented-medium 199 containing heparin, L-glutamine or modified glutamine such as L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine (GlutaMAXz''', GIBCO) and antibiotics at the same concentration as described above, without ECGS, but with 50 ng/ml of FGF-2. Serum-free medium has also been used.
Recoastructioa Protocol with Epithelium Down Steps are reversed for constructs that have endothelium at the bottom of the insert and epithelium, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is laid down between the stroma and underlying layer (epi or endo) to prevent downward cell invasion).
All components are either purchased sterile or sterilized (eg. with a 0.2 ~.m filter). A base medium, such as M199 or DMEM (no phenol red) with serum or serum-free, is used.
Epithelium Biocoat'I''' (Becton-Dickinson) collagen-coated 30 mm inserts or collagen-coated Falcon or Millipore-CM inserts may be used.
Inserts can also be coated with 0.3~ fibrinogen.
5 Epithelial cells are trypsinised and spun down, followed by resuspension in 0.5 ml of medium. Cells are then counted, e.g. with a haemocytometer.
Inserts are then seeded with about 5 to 7.5x10' cells/insert.
10 The inserts are supplemented with 2 ml of medium inside the insert, as well as on the outside.
Cells are then grown until confluence is reached.
Bowman's Membrane After epithelial cells have reached confluence, the 15 matrix is prepared as follows by mixing together gently but well (avoid forming bubbles) collagen, Type I, bovine dermal (3.3 mg/ml; 6 ml) and collagen buffer, lOX (see below; 0.6 ml). The resulting mixture is neutralised with 1 N NaOH, if needed.
20 Then, 100 ~.1 fibronectin (1mg/ml stock) is added and the resulting solution mixed well. All medium is then aspirated from the epithelium within the insert. The Bowman's membrane is layered on and allow to set. The inserts should not be moved during the setting process.
25 Once the Bowman's membrane has set (or preferably, just before it is completely set), PEG is layered on as follows.
10~ PEG in medium only is added on top of Bowman's membrane.
It is then left to sit for 30 min-1 hour in an incubator to form a thin coating over the Bowman's membrane. The solution 30 is aspirated off completely just before adding the stroma. It has been possible to incorporate the PEG into Bowman's membrane directly, instead of this additional step.
Stroma The following components are mixed together in the stated 35 order, mixing gently but very well at each step:
Type I collagen (bovine dermal, approx. 3 mg/ml; 6 ml), collagen buffer, lOX (see below; 1 ml), chondroitin sulphate C
(20~ in PBS; 520 ~,L) and retinol acetate (5 mM; 12 ~L) .
To the above mixture, 100 ~,L of 1~ glutaraldehyde in 205 dextran in medium (M199 or DMEM) is added and mixed thoroughly. The mixture is then left to cross-link at room temperature for at least 30 min to 1 hour, taking care that it is not allowed to solidify.
Unreacted glutaraldehyde is bound up and rendered 'non-toxic' by adding 450 to 500 ~L of 20~ glycine in medium, mixing thoroughly and letting the mixture react for at least 30 min. at room temperature. The mixture is neutralised with 1 N NaOH if required. Te mixture is then further mixed with 5 to 7.5x10° cells/ml. 1.5.m1 of the resulting solution is added to each insert. The inserts are then returned to the incubator until the collagen sets. If the stroma is prepared towards the end of the working day, it can be left overnight to set in the incubator but make sure there is medium on-the outside of the insert so that the epithelial cells do not dry out and die.
Descemet's Membrane Collagen, Type I, bovine dermal (3.3 mg/ml; 0.8m1) collagen, Type IV (0.5 mg/ml; 100 ~1) and collagen medium, lOX
(see below; 0.4 ml) are mixed together gently but well (avoid forming bubbles), and neutralised with 1 N NaOH, if needed.
Then, 100 ~1 of fibronectin is added (lmg/ml stock) and mixed well.
The resulting solution is added (100-150 ~,1) to each insert and allowed to set. Again, the inserts should not be moved during the setting process. If reconstructions are being prepared with the endothelium at the bottom, PEG can be mixed into the Descemet's membrane or layered on top as with Bowman's membrane.
Endothelium Cells are seeded at a concentration of 5 to 7.5x104 per insert in 2 ml of medium per insert. Medium should be replaced as needed.
Air-Liquid Interface Once the reconstruction is complete, the medium outside the inserts is removed. Since the epithelium is at the bottom of the insert, the cells will be at a air-liquid interface.
The cells would be supplemented by medium on the inside of the insert. About 1-2 ml of medium is used with aprotinin and this is replaced regularly (every day or every other day) .
Collagen Buffer (With Serum):
lOX HEPES (200mM HEPES, 100mM NaOH) 9 ml;
lOX Medium 199 or DMEM 9 ml;
FBS 10 ml; and Gentamicin.
Collagen Buffer (Serum-free) lOX HEPES (200mM HEPES, 100mM NaOH) 9 ml;
lOX Medium 199 or DMEM 9 ml;
Serum-free medium, 2X 10 ml;
Insulin-transferrin-selenium (Collaborative) 0.6 ml;
Bovine serum albumin 0.5 g; and Gentamicin.
Medium Once reconstructions are completed, aprotinin is added to the medium for maintaining the cultures (0.07 TIU).
Alternative Methods For Reconstruction The matrix base of the "stroma" can also be constructed from gelatin (a denatured collagenous material) instead~of collagen I, chondroitin sulphate and other matrix components described above.
The fibrin, gelatin matrix of the "sclera" can also be modified for growing the keratocytes of the stroma. This matrix can replace the collagen-based matrix described above.
The matrix supports can be cross-linked for added stability using cross-linking agents such as glutaraldehyde and polyepoxy compounds. Glutaraldehyde can be used for cross-linking and stabilizing the collagen-based matrices.
For example, the stromal matrix is prepared as follows for six 30 mm tissue culture inserts. Components are preferably mixed in the following order, mixing gently but very well at each step: Type I collagen (bovine dermal, approx. 3 mg/ml; 6 ml), collagen buffer (1 ml), chondroitin sulphate C (20~ in PBS;
520 ~L), retinol acetate (5 mM; 12 ~L).
To the above mixure, 100 ~.L of 1~ glutaraldehyde in 20~
dextran in medium (M199 or DMEM) is added and mixed thoroughly. The mixture is then left to cross-link at room temperature for at least 30 min to 1 hour, taking care that it does not solidify. Unreacted glutaraldehyde is bound up and rendered 'non-toxic' by adding 450 to 500 JCL of 20~ glycine in medium, mixing thoroughly and letting the mixture react for at least 30 min. at room temperature. The mixture is neutralised with NaOH if required. After this, stromal cells are mixed in as described previously and the stroma is formed by aliquoting into inserts.
Other forms of fibrillar collagen such as rat tail tendon type I collagen can be successfully substituted, but the mixture should be neutralised before adding chondroitin sulphate or other proteoglycans to prevent unwanted precipitation of collagen-proteoglycan co-polymers.
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) may also be added on its own or within the matrices for Descemet's and Bowman's membranes.
The purpose of the PEG is to prevent invasion of stromal cells into the adjacent endothelial and epithelial compartments and overgrowing them.
Addition of a PEG layer An aqueous solution of PEG, such as the 2~ PEG in medium (e. g. DMEM) is used to create a thin film either between Descemet's membrane and the stroma, and/or between Bowman's membrane and the stroma. The PEG solution is applied to the 'cornea' for 30 min to 1 hour to allow a coating to form. The rest of the solution is carefully aspirated off before adding the next layer.
Adding PEG to Descemet's and/or Bowman's meanbrane PEG can be incorporated into the matrix. For example in Bowman's membrane, the following mixture can be used: type I
collagen (bovine dermal; 1.5 mL), collagen buffer (500 ~,L), fibronectin (1 mg/ml; 100 ~.L) and 20~ PEG in collagen buffer (100 ~.L), with neutralisation with 1 N NaOH. Other type I
collagens such rat tail tendon can also be substituted, but it has been found that bovine dermal collagen gives the best results.
Other non-biological polymers can also be used instead of, or together with, the natural biopolymers. For example, 0.5~ to 1~ polyvinylpyrollidone (PVP) can be added to the fibrin/thrombin matrix described above in order to strengthen it. Blends and copolymers of naturally occurring extracellular matrix molecules and synthetic monomers (eg.
Polyethylene oxide, activated polyethylene glycols, polyurethanes) can also be substituted for the stroma.
DMEM is used without phenol red indicator, instead of Medium 199 (which comes with indicator) when reconstructing corneas for optical measurements. Also, serum-free medium can be substituted for serum-containing medium for the reconstructions.
Although type I collagen and chondroitin sulphate C are preferred, evidence from the literature would suggest that a heterotypic mixture of type I and type V collagen would produce finer fibrils and hence a more transparent matrix.
Keratan and dermatan sulphates can also be used to substitute for chondroitin sulphate. Chondroitin sulphates A and B, and also hyaluronate in place of chondroitin sulphate C, have been used in successful reconstructions.
Functional Testing Stro~ma~l Matrix behavior Corneal stromal matrix is able to swell by 10 to 20% in thickness, when exposed to hypotonic solutions, e.g. distilled 5 water (Duane's Archives of Ophthalmology). This is due to the high proteoglycan content within the stroma that takes up water. The reconstituted matrix was tested to see if it would behave in a similar manner.
Stromal matrices were reconstituted with glutaraldehyde 10 cross-linking in 12 mm inserts, using 250 ~.1 per insert.
The inserts were conditioned in the chondroitin sulphate-containing serum-free medium. Both matrix and medium have 1.35% chondroitin sulphate (isomolar). The thickness of the stromal matrix in each insert was measured using Optical 15 Coherence Tomography (OCT) , with an instrument from Humphrey Instruments (Div. of Carl Zeiss).
Half of the inserts were removed and placed in distilled water. The controls were retained in the chondroitin sulphate containing medium.
20 After one hour incubation, the thickness of each sample was re-measured by OCT.
Changes were noted. Student's t-test (2-tailed, assuming statistical significance at P < 0.05) was performed to determine whether there were any initial thickness differences 25 between control and experimental samples. T-tests were then performed to determine statistical significance in the samples before after exposure to either medium or distilled water.
Six inserts with matrices were used in each group.
Results 30 There was no significant difference (P=0.277) in thickness between control and experimental matrices.
There was a 0.4% decrease in thickness in control samples that were exposed to medium only. This was not statistically significant (P=0.679).
35 There was an 8% increase in stromal matrix thickness when placed in distilled water. This increase in thickness was statistically significant (P=0.014).
Endothelial Function Ouabain, a cardiac glycoside, inhibits Na/K ATPase, disrupting corneal endothelial functioning. When this is applied to the cornea, the endothelium looses its pumping function, and without this, the cornea will swell (Watsky et al. 1990).
1. Corneas were reconstructed in 30 mm inserts. In this experiment, we have contructed them with the epithelium down.
2. A whole cornea was immersed in DMEM only.
3. At the start of the experiment, medium outside insert was removed and replaced with silicone oil. This essentially seals off, the epithelium. Corneal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (Humphrey Instruments, Carl Zeiss, Inc.). Four readings were taken from each cornea and the average was taken.
4. DMEM within the control insert was replaced with 1 ml of fresh DMEM only. Experimental cornea was treated with 10-4M
ouabain in DMEM.
5. After 2 hours, the corneal thicknesses were measured by OCT.
6. Changes in corneal thickness (if any) was calculated.
Results Preliminary results were obtained with one set of corneas.
Corneas completely immersed in medium will swell due to stromal edema (Richard et al. 1991). When silicon oil was applied to the epithelium, this formed a barrier to water entry via the epithelium (Watsky et al. 1989). In the corneas exposed to DMEM only, there was a decrease in thickness by 11%. This likely reflects the osmoregulation of the cornea by endothelial cells, i.e. excess water was pumped out.
When ouabain was applied, endothelial function was likely disrupted. Hence the cornea swelled by 24%.
Testing of Artificial Corneas The optical properties of fresh animal (bovine and lamb) and artificial corneas was measured as a function of wavelength to demonstrate cross species differences. Significant differences were observed across species (Figures 24) for both transparency and non-specular reflection.
In another experiment, artificial and excised animal (rabbit) corneas were exposed to a variety of chemicals with different degrees of toxicity (Figure 25). Transparency was measured using white light (from a halogen light source). The duration of the exposure to the toxic agent (30 sec to 10 minutes) was also varied to modulate the response of the cornea for each of the chemicals. In this experiment the optical properties were only measured immediately before and after the exposure to the chemical agent. The results demonstrate that a response can be measured in the artificial cornea. Similarity between porcine and human corneas is reflected in the similarity in response of the porcine and artificial corneas. This also suggests the artificial corneas are functioning like human corneas The results also reflect across-species (rabbit vs artificial cornea data) differences in the response.
The artificial cornea of the invention may be used, in the insert in which it is prepared, for testing for reaction to applied substances. Preferably, corneas are reconstructed so that the epithelium is on the bottom of the insert, against the porous membrane and the endothelium is on top. The air-liquid interface is achieved by removing all medium surrounding and under the insert, while keeping medium within the insert. The insert is preferably fitted with a leak-proof cap. This allows the insert to be filled with a liquid or semi-liquid medium and once the cap is put on, the capped insert can be inverted for testing.
Testing can be done by placing a test substance on top of a porous membrane that is previously placed over the epithelium.
The porous membrane mimics the protection normally provided by epithelial tear film.
With this method, other layers of the eye such as iris can be introduced by snapping on other chambers and sealing the whole assembly so that it can be inverted for testing.
Numerous modifications, variations and adaptations may be made to the particular embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. All references disclosed herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
REFERENCES
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
5,374,515 12/1994 Parenteau et al.
5,585,265 12/1996 Kahn et al.
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Anderson, J.A:, Richard, N.R., Rock, M.E. and Binder, P.S. 1993. Requirement for vitamin A in long-term culture of human cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34: 3442-3449.
Araki-Sasaki, K., Ohashi, Y., Sasabe, T., Hayashi, K., Watanabe, H., Tano, Y. and Handa, H.1995. Invest.
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36: 614-621.
Assil, K.K. and Quantock, A.J. 1993. Wound healing in response to keratorefractive surgery. Surv. Ophthalmol.
38: 289-302.
Bagley, D.M., Bruner, L.H., deSilva, O., Cottin, M., O'Brien, K.A.F., Uttley, M. and Walker, A.P. 1992. An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicol. in Vitro 6:
275-284.
Bockman, C., Griffith, C.M., and Watsky, M.A. 1998.
Characterization of whole cell ionic currents~from cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Invest.
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39: 1143-1151.
Borenfreund, E. and Puerner, J.A. 1985. Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol. Lett. 24: 119-124.
Bodnar, A.G., Ouellete, M., Frolkis, M., Holt, S.E., Chiu, C.P., Morin, G.B., Harley, C.B., Shay, J.W., Lichtsteiner, S., and Wright, W.E. 1998. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science 279: 349-352.
Burton, A.B.G., York, M. and Lawrence, R.S. 1981. The in vitro assessment of severe eye irritants. Food Cosmet.
5 Toxicol. 19: 471-480.
Collin, H.B., Anderson, J.A., Richard, N.R. and Binder, P.S. 1995. In vitro model for corneal wound healing:
organ cultured human corneas. Curr. Eye Res. 14: 331-339.
Doughman, D.J. 1980. Prolonged donor cornea preservation 10 in organ culture: long term clinical evaluation. Trans.
Am. Ophthlmol. Soc. LXXCVIII: 624-628.
Draize, J.H., Woodard, G. and Calvery, H.O. 1944.
Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucuous 15 membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82:377-390.
Galer, D.M. 1992. A collaborative approach to the evaluation of alternatives to the eye irritation test using chemical intermediates. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol 28:
T-2.
20 Gautheron, P., Dukic, M., Alix, D. and Sina, J.F. 1992.
Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: An in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 18: 442-449.
Gordon, V.C. 1992. Utilization of biomacromolecular in 25 vitro assay systems in the prediction of in vivo toxic responses. Lens and Eye Toxicity Res. 9: 211-227.
Griffith, C.M. and Hay, E.D. 1992. Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation during palatal fusion: carboxyfluorescein traces cells at light and electron microscopic levels.
Development 116: 1987-1099.
Griffith, M. 1997. Midkine and secondary neurulation.
Teratology 55:213-223.
Halbert C.L., Demers, G.W. and Galloway, D.A. 1991. The S E7 gene of human papillomavirus type 16 is sufficient for immortalization of human epithelial cells. J. Virol. 65:
473-478.
Halbert, C.L., Demers, G.W. and Galloway, D.A. 1992. The E6 and E7 genes of human pappiloma virus type 6 have weak immortalizing activity in human epithelial cells. J.
Virol. 66: 2125-2134.
Heitzmann, J. Binder, P.S., Kassar, B.S., and Nordan, L.T. 1993. The correction of high myopia using the excimer laser. Arch. Ophthalmol. 111: 1627-1634.
1S Kahn, C.R., Young, E., Lee, I.H. and Rhim, J.S. 1993.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34: 1983-1990. Human corneal epithelial primary cultures and cell lines with extended life span: in vitro model for ocular studies.
Martin, K.M. and Stott, C.W. 1992. The trans-epithelial permeability assay as an in vitro assay for predicting ocular irritation of surfactant formulations. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 28: T-1032.
Minami, Y., Sugihara, H. and Oono, S. 1993.
Reconstruction of cornea in three-dimensional collagen 2S gel matrix culture. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 34: 2316-2324.
Osborne, R., Perkins, M.A. and Roberts, D.A. 1995.
Development and intralaboratory evaluation of an in vitro human cell-based test to aid ocular irritancy assessments. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 28: 139-153.
Rae, J.L., Cooper, K.E., Gates, P. and Watsky, M.A. 1991.
Low access perforated patch recordings using amphotericin. Brit. J. Neurosci. Methods 37: 15-26.
S Richard, N.R., Anderson, J.A., Weiss, J.L. and Binder, P.S. 1991. Air/liquid corneal organ culture: a light microscopic study. Current Eye Res. 10: 739-749.
Schermer, A., Galvin, S. and Sun, T.T. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 103: 49-62.
Sirois E., Cote, M.F. and Doillon, C.J. 1993. Growth factors and biological support for endothelial cell lining: in vitro study. Int. J. Artificial Organs 16:609-619 .
Southern, P.J. and Berg, P. 1982. Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promoter. J.
Molec. Appl. Gen. 1: 327-341.
Watsky, M.A., McDermott, M.L. and Edelhauser, H.F. 1989.
In vitro corneal endothelial permeability in rabbit and human: The effects of age, cataract surgery and diabetes.
Exp. Eye Res. 49: 751-767.
Watsky, M.A., McCartney, M.D., McLaughlin, B.J. and Edelhauser, H.F. 1990. Corneal endothelial junctions and the effect of Ouabain. Inv. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 31:
933-941.
Watsky, M.A., Cooper, K.E. and Rae, J.L. 1992. A
transient outwardly rectifying potasium current in the rabbit corneal endothelium. J. Membrane Biol. 128:123-132.
Zieske, J.D., Mason, V.S., Wasson, M.E., Meunier, S.F., Nolte, C.J.M., Fukai, N, Olsen, B.R. and Parenteau, N.L.
1994. Basement membrane assesmbly and differentiation of cultured corneal cells: Importance of culture environment and endothelial cell interaction. Exp. Cell Res. 214:
621-633.
(20~ in PBS; 520 ~,L) and retinol acetate (5 mM; 12 ~L) .
To the above mixture, 100 ~,L of 1~ glutaraldehyde in 205 dextran in medium (M199 or DMEM) is added and mixed thoroughly. The mixture is then left to cross-link at room temperature for at least 30 min to 1 hour, taking care that it is not allowed to solidify.
Unreacted glutaraldehyde is bound up and rendered 'non-toxic' by adding 450 to 500 ~L of 20~ glycine in medium, mixing thoroughly and letting the mixture react for at least 30 min. at room temperature. The mixture is neutralised with 1 N NaOH if required. Te mixture is then further mixed with 5 to 7.5x10° cells/ml. 1.5.m1 of the resulting solution is added to each insert. The inserts are then returned to the incubator until the collagen sets. If the stroma is prepared towards the end of the working day, it can be left overnight to set in the incubator but make sure there is medium on-the outside of the insert so that the epithelial cells do not dry out and die.
Descemet's Membrane Collagen, Type I, bovine dermal (3.3 mg/ml; 0.8m1) collagen, Type IV (0.5 mg/ml; 100 ~1) and collagen medium, lOX
(see below; 0.4 ml) are mixed together gently but well (avoid forming bubbles), and neutralised with 1 N NaOH, if needed.
Then, 100 ~1 of fibronectin is added (lmg/ml stock) and mixed well.
The resulting solution is added (100-150 ~,1) to each insert and allowed to set. Again, the inserts should not be moved during the setting process. If reconstructions are being prepared with the endothelium at the bottom, PEG can be mixed into the Descemet's membrane or layered on top as with Bowman's membrane.
Endothelium Cells are seeded at a concentration of 5 to 7.5x104 per insert in 2 ml of medium per insert. Medium should be replaced as needed.
Air-Liquid Interface Once the reconstruction is complete, the medium outside the inserts is removed. Since the epithelium is at the bottom of the insert, the cells will be at a air-liquid interface.
The cells would be supplemented by medium on the inside of the insert. About 1-2 ml of medium is used with aprotinin and this is replaced regularly (every day or every other day) .
Collagen Buffer (With Serum):
lOX HEPES (200mM HEPES, 100mM NaOH) 9 ml;
lOX Medium 199 or DMEM 9 ml;
FBS 10 ml; and Gentamicin.
Collagen Buffer (Serum-free) lOX HEPES (200mM HEPES, 100mM NaOH) 9 ml;
lOX Medium 199 or DMEM 9 ml;
Serum-free medium, 2X 10 ml;
Insulin-transferrin-selenium (Collaborative) 0.6 ml;
Bovine serum albumin 0.5 g; and Gentamicin.
Medium Once reconstructions are completed, aprotinin is added to the medium for maintaining the cultures (0.07 TIU).
Alternative Methods For Reconstruction The matrix base of the "stroma" can also be constructed from gelatin (a denatured collagenous material) instead~of collagen I, chondroitin sulphate and other matrix components described above.
The fibrin, gelatin matrix of the "sclera" can also be modified for growing the keratocytes of the stroma. This matrix can replace the collagen-based matrix described above.
The matrix supports can be cross-linked for added stability using cross-linking agents such as glutaraldehyde and polyepoxy compounds. Glutaraldehyde can be used for cross-linking and stabilizing the collagen-based matrices.
For example, the stromal matrix is prepared as follows for six 30 mm tissue culture inserts. Components are preferably mixed in the following order, mixing gently but very well at each step: Type I collagen (bovine dermal, approx. 3 mg/ml; 6 ml), collagen buffer (1 ml), chondroitin sulphate C (20~ in PBS;
520 ~L), retinol acetate (5 mM; 12 ~L).
To the above mixure, 100 ~.L of 1~ glutaraldehyde in 20~
dextran in medium (M199 or DMEM) is added and mixed thoroughly. The mixture is then left to cross-link at room temperature for at least 30 min to 1 hour, taking care that it does not solidify. Unreacted glutaraldehyde is bound up and rendered 'non-toxic' by adding 450 to 500 JCL of 20~ glycine in medium, mixing thoroughly and letting the mixture react for at least 30 min. at room temperature. The mixture is neutralised with NaOH if required. After this, stromal cells are mixed in as described previously and the stroma is formed by aliquoting into inserts.
Other forms of fibrillar collagen such as rat tail tendon type I collagen can be successfully substituted, but the mixture should be neutralised before adding chondroitin sulphate or other proteoglycans to prevent unwanted precipitation of collagen-proteoglycan co-polymers.
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) may also be added on its own or within the matrices for Descemet's and Bowman's membranes.
The purpose of the PEG is to prevent invasion of stromal cells into the adjacent endothelial and epithelial compartments and overgrowing them.
Addition of a PEG layer An aqueous solution of PEG, such as the 2~ PEG in medium (e. g. DMEM) is used to create a thin film either between Descemet's membrane and the stroma, and/or between Bowman's membrane and the stroma. The PEG solution is applied to the 'cornea' for 30 min to 1 hour to allow a coating to form. The rest of the solution is carefully aspirated off before adding the next layer.
Adding PEG to Descemet's and/or Bowman's meanbrane PEG can be incorporated into the matrix. For example in Bowman's membrane, the following mixture can be used: type I
collagen (bovine dermal; 1.5 mL), collagen buffer (500 ~,L), fibronectin (1 mg/ml; 100 ~.L) and 20~ PEG in collagen buffer (100 ~.L), with neutralisation with 1 N NaOH. Other type I
collagens such rat tail tendon can also be substituted, but it has been found that bovine dermal collagen gives the best results.
Other non-biological polymers can also be used instead of, or together with, the natural biopolymers. For example, 0.5~ to 1~ polyvinylpyrollidone (PVP) can be added to the fibrin/thrombin matrix described above in order to strengthen it. Blends and copolymers of naturally occurring extracellular matrix molecules and synthetic monomers (eg.
Polyethylene oxide, activated polyethylene glycols, polyurethanes) can also be substituted for the stroma.
DMEM is used without phenol red indicator, instead of Medium 199 (which comes with indicator) when reconstructing corneas for optical measurements. Also, serum-free medium can be substituted for serum-containing medium for the reconstructions.
Although type I collagen and chondroitin sulphate C are preferred, evidence from the literature would suggest that a heterotypic mixture of type I and type V collagen would produce finer fibrils and hence a more transparent matrix.
Keratan and dermatan sulphates can also be used to substitute for chondroitin sulphate. Chondroitin sulphates A and B, and also hyaluronate in place of chondroitin sulphate C, have been used in successful reconstructions.
Functional Testing Stro~ma~l Matrix behavior Corneal stromal matrix is able to swell by 10 to 20% in thickness, when exposed to hypotonic solutions, e.g. distilled 5 water (Duane's Archives of Ophthalmology). This is due to the high proteoglycan content within the stroma that takes up water. The reconstituted matrix was tested to see if it would behave in a similar manner.
Stromal matrices were reconstituted with glutaraldehyde 10 cross-linking in 12 mm inserts, using 250 ~.1 per insert.
The inserts were conditioned in the chondroitin sulphate-containing serum-free medium. Both matrix and medium have 1.35% chondroitin sulphate (isomolar). The thickness of the stromal matrix in each insert was measured using Optical 15 Coherence Tomography (OCT) , with an instrument from Humphrey Instruments (Div. of Carl Zeiss).
Half of the inserts were removed and placed in distilled water. The controls were retained in the chondroitin sulphate containing medium.
20 After one hour incubation, the thickness of each sample was re-measured by OCT.
Changes were noted. Student's t-test (2-tailed, assuming statistical significance at P < 0.05) was performed to determine whether there were any initial thickness differences 25 between control and experimental samples. T-tests were then performed to determine statistical significance in the samples before after exposure to either medium or distilled water.
Six inserts with matrices were used in each group.
Results 30 There was no significant difference (P=0.277) in thickness between control and experimental matrices.
There was a 0.4% decrease in thickness in control samples that were exposed to medium only. This was not statistically significant (P=0.679).
35 There was an 8% increase in stromal matrix thickness when placed in distilled water. This increase in thickness was statistically significant (P=0.014).
Endothelial Function Ouabain, a cardiac glycoside, inhibits Na/K ATPase, disrupting corneal endothelial functioning. When this is applied to the cornea, the endothelium looses its pumping function, and without this, the cornea will swell (Watsky et al. 1990).
1. Corneas were reconstructed in 30 mm inserts. In this experiment, we have contructed them with the epithelium down.
2. A whole cornea was immersed in DMEM only.
3. At the start of the experiment, medium outside insert was removed and replaced with silicone oil. This essentially seals off, the epithelium. Corneal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (Humphrey Instruments, Carl Zeiss, Inc.). Four readings were taken from each cornea and the average was taken.
4. DMEM within the control insert was replaced with 1 ml of fresh DMEM only. Experimental cornea was treated with 10-4M
ouabain in DMEM.
5. After 2 hours, the corneal thicknesses were measured by OCT.
6. Changes in corneal thickness (if any) was calculated.
Results Preliminary results were obtained with one set of corneas.
Corneas completely immersed in medium will swell due to stromal edema (Richard et al. 1991). When silicon oil was applied to the epithelium, this formed a barrier to water entry via the epithelium (Watsky et al. 1989). In the corneas exposed to DMEM only, there was a decrease in thickness by 11%. This likely reflects the osmoregulation of the cornea by endothelial cells, i.e. excess water was pumped out.
When ouabain was applied, endothelial function was likely disrupted. Hence the cornea swelled by 24%.
Testing of Artificial Corneas The optical properties of fresh animal (bovine and lamb) and artificial corneas was measured as a function of wavelength to demonstrate cross species differences. Significant differences were observed across species (Figures 24) for both transparency and non-specular reflection.
In another experiment, artificial and excised animal (rabbit) corneas were exposed to a variety of chemicals with different degrees of toxicity (Figure 25). Transparency was measured using white light (from a halogen light source). The duration of the exposure to the toxic agent (30 sec to 10 minutes) was also varied to modulate the response of the cornea for each of the chemicals. In this experiment the optical properties were only measured immediately before and after the exposure to the chemical agent. The results demonstrate that a response can be measured in the artificial cornea. Similarity between porcine and human corneas is reflected in the similarity in response of the porcine and artificial corneas. This also suggests the artificial corneas are functioning like human corneas The results also reflect across-species (rabbit vs artificial cornea data) differences in the response.
The artificial cornea of the invention may be used, in the insert in which it is prepared, for testing for reaction to applied substances. Preferably, corneas are reconstructed so that the epithelium is on the bottom of the insert, against the porous membrane and the endothelium is on top. The air-liquid interface is achieved by removing all medium surrounding and under the insert, while keeping medium within the insert. The insert is preferably fitted with a leak-proof cap. This allows the insert to be filled with a liquid or semi-liquid medium and once the cap is put on, the capped insert can be inverted for testing.
Testing can be done by placing a test substance on top of a porous membrane that is previously placed over the epithelium.
The porous membrane mimics the protection normally provided by epithelial tear film.
With this method, other layers of the eye such as iris can be introduced by snapping on other chambers and sealing the whole assembly so that it can be inverted for testing.
Numerous modifications, variations and adaptations may be made to the particular embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. All references disclosed herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
REFERENCES
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
5,374,515 12/1994 Parenteau et al.
5,585,265 12/1996 Kahn et al.
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Anderson, J.A:, Richard, N.R., Rock, M.E. and Binder, P.S. 1993. Requirement for vitamin A in long-term culture of human cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34: 3442-3449.
Araki-Sasaki, K., Ohashi, Y., Sasabe, T., Hayashi, K., Watanabe, H., Tano, Y. and Handa, H.1995. Invest.
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36: 614-621.
Assil, K.K. and Quantock, A.J. 1993. Wound healing in response to keratorefractive surgery. Surv. Ophthalmol.
38: 289-302.
Bagley, D.M., Bruner, L.H., deSilva, O., Cottin, M., O'Brien, K.A.F., Uttley, M. and Walker, A.P. 1992. An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicol. in Vitro 6:
275-284.
Bockman, C., Griffith, C.M., and Watsky, M.A. 1998.
Characterization of whole cell ionic currents~from cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Invest.
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39: 1143-1151.
Borenfreund, E. and Puerner, J.A. 1985. Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol. Lett. 24: 119-124.
Bodnar, A.G., Ouellete, M., Frolkis, M., Holt, S.E., Chiu, C.P., Morin, G.B., Harley, C.B., Shay, J.W., Lichtsteiner, S., and Wright, W.E. 1998. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science 279: 349-352.
Burton, A.B.G., York, M. and Lawrence, R.S. 1981. The in vitro assessment of severe eye irritants. Food Cosmet.
5 Toxicol. 19: 471-480.
Collin, H.B., Anderson, J.A., Richard, N.R. and Binder, P.S. 1995. In vitro model for corneal wound healing:
organ cultured human corneas. Curr. Eye Res. 14: 331-339.
Doughman, D.J. 1980. Prolonged donor cornea preservation 10 in organ culture: long term clinical evaluation. Trans.
Am. Ophthlmol. Soc. LXXCVIII: 624-628.
Draize, J.H., Woodard, G. and Calvery, H.O. 1944.
Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucuous 15 membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82:377-390.
Galer, D.M. 1992. A collaborative approach to the evaluation of alternatives to the eye irritation test using chemical intermediates. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol 28:
T-2.
20 Gautheron, P., Dukic, M., Alix, D. and Sina, J.F. 1992.
Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: An in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 18: 442-449.
Gordon, V.C. 1992. Utilization of biomacromolecular in 25 vitro assay systems in the prediction of in vivo toxic responses. Lens and Eye Toxicity Res. 9: 211-227.
Griffith, C.M. and Hay, E.D. 1992. Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation during palatal fusion: carboxyfluorescein traces cells at light and electron microscopic levels.
Development 116: 1987-1099.
Griffith, M. 1997. Midkine and secondary neurulation.
Teratology 55:213-223.
Halbert C.L., Demers, G.W. and Galloway, D.A. 1991. The S E7 gene of human papillomavirus type 16 is sufficient for immortalization of human epithelial cells. J. Virol. 65:
473-478.
Halbert, C.L., Demers, G.W. and Galloway, D.A. 1992. The E6 and E7 genes of human pappiloma virus type 6 have weak immortalizing activity in human epithelial cells. J.
Virol. 66: 2125-2134.
Heitzmann, J. Binder, P.S., Kassar, B.S., and Nordan, L.T. 1993. The correction of high myopia using the excimer laser. Arch. Ophthalmol. 111: 1627-1634.
1S Kahn, C.R., Young, E., Lee, I.H. and Rhim, J.S. 1993.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34: 1983-1990. Human corneal epithelial primary cultures and cell lines with extended life span: in vitro model for ocular studies.
Martin, K.M. and Stott, C.W. 1992. The trans-epithelial permeability assay as an in vitro assay for predicting ocular irritation of surfactant formulations. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 28: T-1032.
Minami, Y., Sugihara, H. and Oono, S. 1993.
Reconstruction of cornea in three-dimensional collagen 2S gel matrix culture. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 34: 2316-2324.
Osborne, R., Perkins, M.A. and Roberts, D.A. 1995.
Development and intralaboratory evaluation of an in vitro human cell-based test to aid ocular irritancy assessments. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 28: 139-153.
Rae, J.L., Cooper, K.E., Gates, P. and Watsky, M.A. 1991.
Low access perforated patch recordings using amphotericin. Brit. J. Neurosci. Methods 37: 15-26.
S Richard, N.R., Anderson, J.A., Weiss, J.L. and Binder, P.S. 1991. Air/liquid corneal organ culture: a light microscopic study. Current Eye Res. 10: 739-749.
Schermer, A., Galvin, S. and Sun, T.T. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 103: 49-62.
Sirois E., Cote, M.F. and Doillon, C.J. 1993. Growth factors and biological support for endothelial cell lining: in vitro study. Int. J. Artificial Organs 16:609-619 .
Southern, P.J. and Berg, P. 1982. Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promoter. J.
Molec. Appl. Gen. 1: 327-341.
Watsky, M.A., McDermott, M.L. and Edelhauser, H.F. 1989.
In vitro corneal endothelial permeability in rabbit and human: The effects of age, cataract surgery and diabetes.
Exp. Eye Res. 49: 751-767.
Watsky, M.A., McCartney, M.D., McLaughlin, B.J. and Edelhauser, H.F. 1990. Corneal endothelial junctions and the effect of Ouabain. Inv. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 31:
933-941.
Watsky, M.A., Cooper, K.E. and Rae, J.L. 1992. A
transient outwardly rectifying potasium current in the rabbit corneal endothelium. J. Membrane Biol. 128:123-132.
Zieske, J.D., Mason, V.S., Wasson, M.E., Meunier, S.F., Nolte, C.J.M., Fukai, N, Olsen, B.R. and Parenteau, N.L.
1994. Basement membrane assesmbly and differentiation of cultured corneal cells: Importance of culture environment and endothelial cell interaction. Exp. Cell Res. 214:
621-633.
Claims (31)
1. An artificial mammalian cornea which comprises:
a) an endothelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) a crosslinked stromal matrix;
c) an epithelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells; and d) at least one layer selected from Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane.
a) an endothelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) a crosslinked stromal matrix;
c) an epithelium comprising primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells; and d) at least one layer selected from Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane.
2. The cornea of claim 1, wherein the stromal matrix comprises primary or immortalized mammalian stroma cells.
3. The cornea of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein at least one of a) through c) comprises immortalized cells.
4. The cornea of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein at least one of a) through c) comprises immortalized human cells.
5. The cornea of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein all of a) through c) comprise immortalized cells.
6. The cornea of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein all of a) through c) comprise immortalized human cells.
7. The cornea of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein Bowman's membrane and Descemet's membrane are present.
8. The cornea of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein Bowman's membrane comprises Type I collagen.
9. The cornea of claim 1 or claim 2 which is free from related eye parts.
10. The cornea of any one of claims 1 to 8, which further comprises an artificial sclera comprising primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells.
11. The cornea of claim 10, wherein the angiogenic cells are human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).
12. The cornea of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the cornea is an artificial human cornea.
13. The cornea of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the epithelium cells are corneal cells.
14. The cornea of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the endothelium cells are corneal cells.
15. The cornea of any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein gluteraldehyde is used to crosslink the stromal matrix.
16. A method for preparing an artificial mammalian cornea which comprises the following steps in the following order:
a) growing an endothelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the endothelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the endothelium or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
d) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an epithelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of steps b) or d) must be present.
a) growing an endothelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the endothelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the endothelium or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
d) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an epithelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of steps b) or d) must be present.
17. A method for preparing an artificial mammalian cornea which comprises the following steps in the following order:
a) growing an epithelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the epithelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the epithelium or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
d) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an endothelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of steps b) or d) must be present.
a) growing an epithelium which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian epithelium cells;
b) optionally layering a Bowman's membrane on the epithelium;
c) forming a stromal matrix on the epithelium or on the Bowman's membrane, if present;
d) optionally layering a Descemet's membrane on the stromal matrix; and e) growing an endothelium, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian endothelium cells, on the stromal matrix or on the Descemet's membrane, if present;
wherein at least one of steps b) or d) must be present.
18. The method of claim 16 or claim 17, which includes:
i) growing an artificial sclera, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells, around a resilient removable plug;
ii) removing the plug and inserting the endothelium, the optional Descemet's membrane and the stromal matrix, wherein the stromal matrix is essentially co-planar with the artificial sclera to receive the optional Bowman's membrane;
iii) optionally layering the Bowman's membrane on the stromal matrix and the artificial sclera;
iv) growing the epithelium on the stromal matrix and sclera or the Bowman's membrane, if present.
i) growing an artificial sclera, which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells, around a resilient removable plug;
ii) removing the plug and inserting the endothelium, the optional Descemet's membrane and the stromal matrix, wherein the stromal matrix is essentially co-planar with the artificial sclera to receive the optional Bowman's membrane;
iii) optionally layering the Bowman's membrane on the stromal matrix and the artificial sclera;
iv) growing the epithelium on the stromal matrix and sclera or the Bowman's membrane, if present.
19. The method of claim 16 or claim 17, which includes, in step c), additionally forming an artificial sclera co-planar with the stromal matrix which artificial sclera comprises primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells.
20. A commercial package which comprises:
a) the cornea of any one of claims 1 to 15, and b) instructions for its use for either testing a substance for ocular irritancy, toxicity or drug efficacy, or transplantation.
a) the cornea of any one of claims 1 to 15, and b) instructions for its use for either testing a substance for ocular irritancy, toxicity or drug efficacy, or transplantation.
21. A serum-free culture medium which comprises:
at least one of each of a protease inhibitor, a growth factor, a substance which mediates the growth factor and a free-radical scavenger.
at least one of each of a protease inhibitor, a growth factor, a substance which mediates the growth factor and a free-radical scavenger.
22. The serum-free culture medium according to claim 21, which further comprises a substance which prevents cellular contraction.
23. Use of the serum-free culture medium according to claim 21 or claim 22, for culturing a cornea in vitro.
24. The use according to claim 23, wherein the cornea is a human cornea.
25. An artificial sclera which comprises primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells.
26. An artificial mammalian cornea which comprises:
a) a stromal matrix;
b) Bowman's membrane; and c) Descemet's membrane.
a) a stromal matrix;
b) Bowman's membrane; and c) Descemet's membrane.
27. The cornea of claim 26, which further comprises an artificial sclera comprising primary or immortalized mammalian angiogenic cells.
28. The cornea of claim 27, wherein the angiogenic cells are human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).
29. The cornea of any one of claims 26 to 28, wherein the cornea is an artificial human cornea.
30. The cornea of any one,of claims 26 to 29, w-herein the stromal matrix is crosslinked.
31. The cornea of claim 30, wherein gluteraldehyde is used to crosslink the stromal matrix.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA002318641A CA2318641A1 (en) | 1998-01-23 | 1999-01-25 | Artificial cornea |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA2,227,827 | 1998-01-23 | ||
CA 2227827 CA2227827A1 (en) | 1998-01-23 | 1998-01-23 | In vitro artificial cornea and sclera |
CA002318641A CA2318641A1 (en) | 1998-01-23 | 1999-01-25 | Artificial cornea |
PCT/CA1999/000057 WO1999037752A1 (en) | 1998-01-23 | 1999-01-25 | Artificial cornea |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2318641A1 true CA2318641A1 (en) | 1999-07-29 |
Family
ID=25679997
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002318641A Abandoned CA2318641A1 (en) | 1998-01-23 | 1999-01-25 | Artificial cornea |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2318641A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2018050927A1 (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2018-03-22 | Immunosearch | Method for evaluating the eye irritation potential of chemical products |
-
1999
- 1999-01-25 CA CA002318641A patent/CA2318641A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2018050927A1 (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2018-03-22 | Immunosearch | Method for evaluating the eye irritation potential of chemical products |
FR3056227A1 (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2018-03-23 | Immunosearch | METHOD OF EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL OF OCULAR IRRITATION OF CHEMICALS |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6645715B1 (en) | Artificial cornea | |
San Choi et al. | Bioengineering endothelialized neo-corneas using donor-derived corneal endothelial cells and decellularized corneal stroma | |
AU703320B2 (en) | In vitro tissue and organ equivalent models | |
CN1080130C (en) | In vitro conea equivalent model | |
Dravida et al. | A biomimetic scaffold for culturing limbal stem cells: a promising alternative for clinical transplantation | |
ABOALCHAMAT et al. | Morphological and functional analysis of immortalized human corneal endothelial cells after transplantation | |
Mimura et al. | Transplantation of corneas reconstructed with cultured adult human corneal endothelial cells in nude rats | |
He et al. | Cutting and decellularization of multiple corneal stromal lamellae for the bioengineering of endothelial grafts | |
JP4834802B2 (en) | Culture layer laminate of human corneal endothelial cells and method for producing the same | |
WO2006116137A2 (en) | Artificial cornea | |
Zhao et al. | Construction of tissue-engineered human corneal endothelium for corneal endothelial regeneration using a crosslinked amniotic membrane scaffold | |
Sugino et al. | A method to enhance cell survival on Bruch's membrane in eyes affected by age and age-related macular degeneration | |
Myung et al. | Bioactive interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels that support corneal epithelial wound healing | |
Zhao et al. | Development of a three-dimensional organ culture model for corneal wound healing and corneal transplantation | |
Murali et al. | Characterisation and validation of the 8-fold quadrant dissected human retinal explant culture model for pre-clinical toxicology investigation | |
CA2318641A1 (en) | Artificial cornea | |
KR100996846B1 (en) | Corneal or conjunctival tissue sheet using non-mucosal epithelial cells | |
Wang et al. | Migration and proliferation of retinal pigment epithelium on extracellular matrix ligands. | |
Figueiredo et al. | Corneal Epithelial Stem Cells: Methods for Ex Vivo Expansion | |
Xie et al. | Fabrication of bioengineered corneal endothelial grafts using an allogeneic cornea-derived matrix | |
Gu et al. | The safety of photochemical tissue bonding for treating damaged corneal epithelium using limbal stem cells pre-cultured on human amniotic membrane | |
Lee et al. | Expression of laminin-5 with amniotic membrane transplantation in excimer laser ablated rat corneas | |
JP5869810B2 (en) | Method for evaluating the load on a living body | |
KR20230124246A (en) | Method of endotheliocyte isolation and culture in cornea | |
Kölln et al. | Tissue-based in vitro and ex vivo models for ocular permeability studies |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |