CA2211778A1

CA2211778A1 - Preparation of pregelatinized high amylose starch and debranched starch useful as an excipient for controlled release of active agents

Info

Publication number: CA2211778A1
Application number: CA 2211778
Authority: CA
Inventors: Francois Carriere; Yves Dumoulin
Original assignee: Rougier Inc
Current assignee: 9068-3293 QUEBEC Inc
Priority date: 1997-08-14
Filing date: 1997-08-14
Publication date: 1999-02-14
Also published as: AU8724198A; WO1999009066B1; WO1999009066A1

Abstract

A process is disclosed for the manufacture of an excipient useful for the controlled release of an active agent. In this process, a starting material consisting of starch or high amylose starch is subjected to a gelatinization in an aqueous medium.
When the starting material consists of starch having an amylose content of less than 50% by weight, the gelatinized material is subjected to an enzymatic debranchingtreatment so as to obtain a gelatinized debranched starch having a short amylosechain content of at least 50% by weigh. When the starting material consists of starch having an amylose content of at least 50% by weight or of a high amylose starch having an amylose content up to 80% by weight, the gelatinized material is optionally subjected to an enzymatic debranching treatment so as to obtain a gelatinized debranched starch having a short amylose chain content of 20% to 50%by weight. The so obtained gelatinized and optionally debranched starch is further subjected to a thermal dehydration in order to obtain the requested excipient in form of a powder. Also disclosed is a dosage administration form for the sustained release of one or more active agents in the form of a powder. This form which is preferably a tablet, comprises the active agent(s) in admixture with the above excipient in such an amount as to achieve the requested sustained release.

Description

Preparation of pregelatinized high amylose starch an~ debranched starch useful as an excipient for controlled release of active agents 5 FIELD O~ THI~ INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process for the manufacture of tablet excipients for use in the pharmaceutical industry.
More particularly, it relates to an economical process for the industrial manufacture in an aqueous medium of sustained release excipients comprising an 10 enzymatically debranched starch or a pregelatinized high amylose starch.
The debranched starch and the pregelatinized high amylose starch prepared according to the invention are suitable in the preparation of tablets, pellets, pills and granules. Therefore, the invention further relates to the use of these excipients for the preparation of tablets or other dosage administration forms for sustained release of 15 active agents.

BACKGROUND OF TFIE INVENTION
One of the most pressing problems facing the pharmaceutical industry today is that in the past few years, only a very limited number of new drug products have 20 been approved for marketing by the l~ood and drug administration (FDA). Tlle lack of FDA-approved drugs, the high cost of new drug development, and the expirationof patents for existing dmgs means that many pharmaceutical companies will be faced with a decreasing number of patent-protected drugs from which they may generate revenue. Development of novel methods of delivering these drugs may not25 only expend the patent life of tlle existing dmgs but also minimize the scope and expenditure of testing required for }~DA approval [Controlled-Release Drug Administration: Logic, by Y.W.Chien in Novel Drug Delivery Systems, vol. l 4, chap. l, Marcel Dekker, New York, l 982~.
In this context, many efforts were devoted to the development of new 30 excipients for the controlled release of drugs by various routes of administration. In the recent years, particular emphasis l1as been placed on tl1e oral administration of drugs and, among the multitude of forms in which the drug may be so-dispensed, the compressed tablet form is the one that has been the most frequently employed.
In addition to the active ingredient(s), tablets usually contains several inert substances, referred to as excipients, in sufficient amount to accomplish the desired effect. Excipients are generally classified by their functions and the major types used 5 are fillers or diluents, binders, disintegrants, binder-disintegrants, lubricants and glidants [see for example "Compressed tablets" by B. B. Sheth et al in Pharmaceutical dosage forms, vol. l, chap. 3, p 109- 185,11. A. Lieberman and L.Lachman, Marcel Dekker, New York 1980]. Other specific excipients that are commonly used include colorants, sweeteners, navors and the like.
1 0 Further specific excipients tbat are commonly used in this field consist of "slow release" excipients that are usually made of polymers selected to prolong and sustain the release of actives ingredients [see for example U.S. pat no. 3,087,860;
U.S. pat. no. 2,987,445]. Use of polymers in the area of controlled delivery really began in the 1960's. Colin [Colin D. M., ~ydrophilic matrix sustained release 1 5 systems based on polysacchal ide Carriers, Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 8 (4), l991, 395-421.] have reported that hydrophilic matrices prepared with polysaccharides and their derivatives are polymers of choice as tl1e rate controlling carriers for these systems.
Among the polysaccharidic material, starch is one of the most interesting 20 polymer used in the field. Starch is a natural carbohydrate and is considered to be tl1e most important source of energy in plants. It is composed of two distinct fractions, namely (l ) amylose whicl1 is a non-ramirled rraction containil1g about 4,000 glucose units joint by c~-1,4 links, and (2) amylopectin whicll is a branched fraction composed of about l 00,000 glucose units. Starch is a natural occurring25 diluent but it can also be used as a tahlet disintegral1t agent. Starch Call be modiried through physical, chen1ical or enzymatic processes.
Pregelatini%ed commol1 starch contail1s usually 20 to 30 % w/w oramylo.se. It is produced by gelatinization directly followed by a thermal dehydration process like drum-drying, spray drying or extrusion. It is commonly used in the place of starcl1, 30 as a filler and binder-disintegratillg agent. However, Nakano et al. [Nakano M., Naka~ollo N. and Inotsume N., Preparation and evaluation orsustained release tablets prepared with a-starch, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 35 (l 987) 4346-43501 has already reported that pregelatinized starch may also be used as sustained release hydrogels.
Herman et al. [Herman J. and Remon J. P., Modified starches as hydrophilic matrices for controlled oral delivery. TI. In vitro drug release evaluation of thermally modified starches, Internatiollal Jourllal of Pl1arlIlaceutics, 56 (1989) 65-70] have 5 investigated the effect of many parameters on the sustained release properties of pregelatinized starch. They have concluded that the ratio amylose/amylopectin is the most important factor influencing swelling characteristics and iM l~ilro drug release rate. Tablets made wilh common pregelatinized starch and tested in vilro (25 % of amylose w/w) are reported to splits into two parts resulting in a burst of 10 drug release because of an increase in free surface area. In their article, Herman et al.
have also concluded that pregelatillized higll amylose starch (70% of amylose) do not form a coherent gel layer and do nOt sustain release. Pregelatinized waxy corn starch (100 % of amylopectin w/w and amylose free) is reported to form a gel layer during hydration and to decrease the drug release rate. However, the swollen gel layer of 15 the amylose free starches (amylopectin) are reported to be very weak and the in vivo tablet erosion may considerably accelerate the drug release.
Visavarungroj et al. [Visavarullgro; N., Herman J. and Remon J. r., Cross-linked starch as sustained release agent, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 16, (7), 1091-1108, 1990] have also disclosed that cross-linked waxy 20 starches (amylose free starches) could be used as filler and disintegrant but are not recommended to use as a hydrophilic matrix in a sustained release formulation.
Milojevic et al. [Milojevic S.et al, Amylose, the new perspective in oral drug delivery to the human large intestine, STP Pharma Sciences 5(1) 47-53 (1995)] teach the preparation of coated pellets using a mixture of amylose and ethylcellulose as a 25 coating excipient to suppress drug release over a period of 1 2h. The amy]ose-Ethocel(~) mixture may be used in the formulation of an a-amylase resistant coating for the drug delivery to the human large intestine. In this article, amylose is extracted from starch by sequential aqueo-ls leachillg in hot water and thell is isolated as a complex with the addition of butanol- I . Tllis article also reports that amylose 30 alone is unsatisfactory as a coating material and that the butanol-treated amylose must actually be mixed with at least 60% of ethylcellulose to be efficient.

Modified and/or cross-linked starches are known to be powerful disintegrating agents witll poor bindhlg properties [see U.S. pat. No. 3,622, 677 and U.S. pat no. 4,369,308]. Usually, starch granules are cross-linking to increase their resistance to shear or to prevent gelatinization when heated, thereby permitting5 utili%ation of cross-linked starch granules in applications whicll would destroy granules of unmodified starch. The preparation of modified and/or cross-linked starch is well known in the art and such preparation is described in numerous text books or publications [see for example "Starch derivatives: production and uses" by M. W. Rutellberg and D. Solarek in Starch chemistry and technology, 2nd ed., chap.
10 x, p. 31 1-379, R. L. Whistler, J. N. BeMiller and E. F. Paschall, Academic Press, 1984]. Only a few investigators have reported that cross-linked pregelatinized starch can be used as a sustained release agent. Kost et al. [Kost J. and Shefer S., Cllemically-modified polysaccharides for enzymatically-controlled oral drug delivery, Biomaterials I 1 (1990) 695-698] teach the preparation and use of starch 15 ionically cross-linked starch by calcium chloride for entrapment and controlled release of bioactive molecules. The drug release rate is reported to be greatly affected by a-amylase activity. Van Aerde et al. [Van Aerde P. and Remon J. P."nvitr~ evaluation of modified starches as matrices for sustained release dosage form, International Journal of rharlllace~ltics, 45, 145-152 (1988)] also reports ~hat20 increasing the degree of cross-linking of pregelatinized starch increases the tablet drug release rate.
Mateescu et al. [see U. S. pat. No. 5,456,921 to Labopharm Inc.] teach how to prepare cross-linked amylose useful as a sustained release excipient. The so-prepared cross-linked amylose has a cross-linking degree from 0.1 to 10 % (based on the 25 quantity of epichlorohydrin used to cross-link 100 g of high amylose starch). It is prepared by a water-miscible organic solvent process. In the description of the patent, it is demonstrated that pregelatinized high amylose starch (not cross-linked) is not suitable as a sustained release excipient. In fact, tablets made of 400 mg of pregelatinized high amylose starch containillg 100 mg of theophylline released the 30 totality of the drug in about 1.2 hours only.
Cartilier et al. [see International laid-open patent no. WO94/21236 to ~abophann Inc.] teach that cross-linked amylose having a cross-linking degree of 6 to 30, can be used as a binder and/or disintegrant agent for the preparation of tablets by direct compression. The binding properties of this product are reported to bederlnitively superior to starch. The quality of the binding and the controlled release properties of cross-linked amylose are closely related to the cross-linking degree and 5 to the relative amount of amylose present in the starch used for the manufacture.
Mateescu et al. [see International laid-open patent no. W094/02 l 2 l to Labopharm] also describe the association of oc-amylase in tablets made of cross-linked amylose in view of increasing the dissolution rate of low soluble drugs.
Recently, Dumoulin et al.[see IJ. S. application serial No 08/800,5t8 to 10 Rougier Inc.] have described an economical and industrial aqueous process for the manufacture of a tablet excipient, and in particular, to a slow release excipient mainly composed of cross-linked amylose useful in the preparation of controlled release dosage form by direct compression.
Wai-Chiu [see l~uropean patent EP-~\-449,648 to National Starch] teach how 15 to prepare a tablet binding-disintegrating excipient by enzymatic debranchillg of starch. Tlle starch product obtained is. characterize by a content of at least 20 % of short chain amylose by weight. Short chain amylose as such or modified and /or cross-linked short chain amylose resulting from the enzymatic debranching of starch prior to after chen1ical modification, can be used as a binder-disintegrant in tablets. It 20 is reported that tl1e bindil1g-disintegratil1g properties of SUCIl producls increase Witll the quantity of short amylose chains produced by the hydrolysis of amylopectill . It is reported by Wai-Chiu that pregelatini7ed higl1 amylose starch containing at least 50 % of long chain amylose is also useful as a binder/disintegrant.
Arends-Scl1olte et al. ~see International laid-open patent no. wos6/nss l 5 to 25 Cooperaieve Verkoop-Enproductiev-Erel1iging Van Aardappelmeel En Derivaten Avebe B.A.] teach how to manufacture a tablet excipient from disintegrated starch granules prepared by enzymatic debranching of starch and characteri7.ed by a content of long chain amylose of at least l O % by weight based on the annount of drug. In the description of this laid-open application, it is shown that a tablet manufactured with a 30 starch product contailling 65 % of long chain amylose and 35 % of short chainamylose which has not been dehydrated with ethanol, disintegrates and is therefore not suitable as a sustained release excipient.

Te Wierik et al [Te Wierik G.H.P., Eissens A.C., Besemer A.C. and Lerk C.T~.~ Prepalatioll, chal-acteri7.a~ion and aplllicalion oramylodextrill, melaslahle amylodextrins and metastable amylose, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 10, No. 9, 1993] teach how to prepare amylodextrin by enzymatic hydrolysis of waxy maize 5 starch with Pullulanase. The resulting soluble fraction of amylodextrin is freeze-dried or dehydrated by treatment with organic solvent as ethanol. They also report the successful application of amylodextrin as an excipient in the preparation ofcontrolled release systems. They furtller report that all amylodextrin tablets tested in vi~ro showed fracturing on immersion in the dissolution medium. Te Wierik et al 10 [Te Wierik G.H.P., Van der Veen J., Eissens A.C. and Lerk C.F., Preparation, characterization and application orlinear dextrins. Part VI. General applicability and mechallism of programmed release from amylodextrin tablets, J. Control. Release, 27 (1993) 9-17]. Dissolution profile and release kinetics may be altered by the presence of tablet fracturing and this may lead to a lack of reproducibility of the system.
Te Wierik et al [Te Wierik G.I-I.P., Eissens ~.C.,Bergsma J., ~rends-Scholte A.W., Lerk C.F., A new generation of starcll products as excipient in pharmaceutical tablets. II. I-Iigh surface area retrograded pregelatinized potato starcll products in sustained-release tablets, J. Control. Release, 45 (1997) 25-331 also teach the preparation of new linear short chain starch of high specific surface area possessing 20 sustained release properties. lhe short chain starch is prepared by gelatinization of potato starch followed by a complete degradation of amylopectin USillg a debranching enzyme (Pullulanase) and a controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of amylose chain using a-amylase. The short chain starcll of high specific surface area is obtained following a precipitation (retrogradation), filtration and dehydration by 25 freeze-drying or by substitution of water by alcohol or acetone prior to air drying. It is reported that low surface area linear product obtahled by thermal dehydration(drying at room or elevated reference temperatures or spray drying) do not have sustained release properties and quickly disintegrate.
Te Wierik et al. [Te Wierik G. I l. 1'., l~issens A. C., 13esemer A. C. and l,erk 30 C. F., Preparation, characterization, and pharmaceutical application of linear dextrins. I. Preparation and characterisation of amylodextrin, metastable amylodextrins, and metastable amylose, Pharmaceutical Research, vol 10, no 9, 1993] further teach the pl elJa~ ~lion of metastable amylose useful as sustained release excipient. Metastable amylose is prepared by complexation of amylose V(~) supplied by AVEBE, with 2-methyl-1-butanol followed by a dehydration with ethanol ~Te Wierik G.H.P., Eissens A.C., Bergsma J., Arends-Scholte A.W., Lerk C.F., A new 5 generation of starch products as excipient in pharmaceutical tablets,, J. Colltrol.
Release, 45 (1997) 25-33]. Te Wierik et al also report and insist 011 the fact that pregelatinized high amylose starch do not sustained release and long chain linear amylose (amylose V(~) must be dehydrated USillg an organic solvent (ethanol) to obtain sustained release properties. However, water front penetration into tablets made of metastable amylose has a higher deviation from linear kinetics than intoamylodextrin tablets.
As may be appreciated, none of the starch products briefly disclosed hereinabove display all of the desirable sustained release properties. In fact, due to the high production cost and the complexity of the manufacturing processes, there is a need lor a low cost starcll wllicll is suitable as s-lslairled release excipielll.
Until llOW, the literature has demonstrated that pregelatinized high amylose starch (70 % of amylose w/w) seems not to be suitable as a llydrophilic matrix in a sustained release formulation and tllat debranched starch must be dehydrated using an organic solvent to obtain sustained release properties.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide an economical process for the industrial manufacture in an aqueous medium of pregelatinized higll amylose starch possessing unpredictable sustained release properties.
Another object of the invention is to provide a process for the industrial manufacture by aqueous processing and thermal dehydration, of an enzymatically debranched starch having the same desired sustained release properties as presently obtained by ethanol treatment.
Still another object of the invention is to provide tablets or similar oral dosage forms containillg the so-prepared pregelatinized high amylose starch or debranched starch as a suitable excipient for controlled release of the active agent(s) contained in the tablets.

Gelatinization The process according to the invention for the industrial manufacture of starch products useful as excipient for controlled release of active agents comprises a first step of gelatinization, that is common to all kinds of starting materials.It is known that Micellar crystallites held together by hydrogen bonding between amylopectin and amylose are responsible for the integrity of starch granules.
When aqueous suspension of starch is heated to a certain temperature (gelatinization), the hydrogen bonding weakens and the granules swell until collapsing.
There are numerous methods of gelatini~ation of starch that are known in lhe art, including direct or indirect heating of an aqueous dispersion of starch, chemical treatment USil1g a strong alkali or the combinatiol1 ora mechal1ical and heat treatment.
Pregelatinized starch is known to be soluble in cold water. At first sight, one 15 could argue that gelatinization of starch should not be desirable to obtain a controlled release excipient. However, it has been fo~lnd that the gelatinization of starch is essential to achieve leaching of amylose from granules of starcl1 in view of obtaining release properties.

20 Optional debranching As reported in the prior art, most starch granules contain two types of polymers: amylose (5-75% by weight based on dry substallce) and amylopectin (25-95% by weight based on dry substance). Amylose is essentially a long linear molecule whereas amylopectin is a highly branched molecule. Amylopectin may be 25 debranched by treatment with a debranching enzyme, such as Pullulanase and isoamylase. After such treatment the resulting starch will essentially be composed of long amylose chains and short amylose chains in a ratio depending of the initialamylopectin content and the efficiency of the enzymatic treatment.
In accordance with the invention, the starch product that is being used for the 30 preparation of the excipient, must contain at least 50% by weight of amylose.Tl1erefore, if use is made of high amylose starch (viz. a starch already containing 50% by weight or more of amylose), debranching is optional. I--lowever, if use is made of"common" starch (viz. a starcl~ containing from 20 to 50% by weight of amylose only) or of"waxy" starch, it is necessary to subject the gelatinized starch to a debranching step, in which the amylopectin molecules are hydrolysed with a suitable enzyme, viz. Pullulanase.

Drying The process according to the invention further comprises a drying step whicll must be carried out in order to dry the gelatinized higl1 amylose starch or debranched starch that have been prepared.
Numerous methods are described in the literature for drying gelatinized starch: such as drum-drying or spray drying techniques USil1g spray nozzle or atomisation disc. I~owever, according to the literature, the pregelatinized highamylose starch prepared by the drying method mentioned above is supposedly not to be suitable as a sustained release excipient.
In accordance with the present invention, it has surprisingly been found that gelatinized higl1 amylose or debranched starch prepared in an aqueous medium andthermally dehydrated, are particularly useful and efficient as a sustained release excipient.
Among the numerous aqueous thermal method that can be used, spray drying is the one that is particularly preferred in accordance with the invention.

Optional therm~l tre:~tment As is already disclosed in U.S. application No. 08/800,5 l 8 to Dumoulin et al, if the pregelatinized starcll or the debrancl1ed starch is cooled and kept at a temperature in the range of l to 20~C for transportation or any other reason, the starch product must be thermally treated at a temperature higl1er than l 00~C to obtain the sustained release properties.

Optional wet granulation The particle size of the particles of starches powder obtained by spray drying is smaller than 5011m. Accordingly, it may be useful to subject the so-obtained powder to a granulation in order to enlarge the particle size and obtain uniform particles that will easily flow througl1 a tablet macl1ine hopper and feed frame into tablet dyes. Powder recovered from the spray dryer may be wet formulated in lineusing a fluid bed granulator. Alternatively, such a powder can be granulated in a fluid bed or a V-blender.

Formulation As aforesaid, the dried products that is so obtained can be used as an excipient for the manufacture of controlled release tablets or similar oral dosage forms.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the amylose starch or debranched starch that is so-obtained, can be admixed with small amounts of polymers such as Carhopol(~, Ale~hocel@~ or any similar adjuvant which becomes viscous in the presence of water and may fill the small cracks that are formed in the tablets during dissolution. Such permits to obtain a quasi zero order drug release 15 without profile fluctuation. This addition is particularly useFul and efrlcient ror tablets. ~owever, it is not compulsory for other dosage forms, such as granules.The amount of drug contained in the dosage form may vary within a wide range, depending on the solubility of the drug. It is however preferred that theamount of drug in the form be lower than 60n/o by weight of the total weight of the 20 form.
It is worth mentioning that, in addition to raw starches, chemically cross-linked or substituted pregelatinized starches are also eligible for use as starting materials in the process according to the inventiol1. The cross-linking or substitution of the starch may be realized before or after hydrolysis of amylopectin molecules. If a 25 moderate chemical modification of the starch is carried out prior to the hydrolysis, the debranching enzyme will still recognize and hydrolyse the amylopectin and convert it into short chain amylose.
The invention and its advantages will be better understood upon reading the following non-restrictive detailed description.

.

DETAILI~D DESCRIPTION OF THI~ INVENTION

1. Preparation of gelatinized lligh amylose starch 5 Step (l.a) Starch gelatillizatiol1 by thermol1lechanical lreatmel1t High amylose starch in the form of an aqueous dispersion (l to 20% w/w based on dry weight) is preferably gelatini%ed in a scraped-surface heat exchanger at a temperature range of l l 0 to l 60~ C for 5 to 60 mil1utes depending on tlle amylose content, temperature and quantity introduced.
Step (l .b) Spray drying of the gelatinized high amylose starch The so obtained aqueous gelatinized high amylose starch, at a concentration in the range of 0,5 to l 5% w/w, most preferably in the range of 4 to l 2% w/w, and at a temperature in the range from 20 to 90~C, most preferably from 40 to 70~C, can be 15 spray dried using a spray nozzle or a rotating disc having an inlet temperature in the range of l 75 to 350~C and an outlet temperature in the range of 60 to l 35~C.

2. Preparation of gelatini~ed debr7~nche(l starch 20 Step (2.a) Starch gelatinization prior to the enzymatic treatment Like in the case of the high amylose starch, common starch or waxy starch can be gelatinized thermomechanically as described itl step l.a. I-lowever, it must thereafter be treated with a debranching enzyme.

25 Step (2.b) Hydrolysis of amylopectin molecules using Pullulanase The aqueous solution of gelatinized starch (5 to 20% by weight based on dry substance) can be treated with Promozyne 200 L (Pullulanase) in the range of 0.1 to l 0% (v/g based on weight of the dry substance) at a pH in the r ange of 3.5 to 6 and at temperature in the range of 35 to 65~C for l to 24 hours depending of the 30 amylopectin content and the hydrolysis parameters chosen. The p~-l of the resulting debranched starch may be adjusted in a preferable manner between 6 and 7. The CA 022ll778 l997-08-l4 debranching reaction is ended by heating the starch slurry at a temperature higl1er than 70~C until enzyme inactivation.

Step (2.c) Thermal dehydration of debranched starch According to the literature, debrancl1ed starch must be dehydrated by water substitution with ethanol or acetone in order to obtain sustained release properties.
As aforesaid, in accordance with this invelltion, it has been found that debranched starch prepared in an aqueous medium and dehydrated by a thermal method is also offered as sustained release excipient.
Among the numerous aqueous thermal method described in the literature, debranched starch is preferably dehydrated (dried) by spraying drying an aqueoussolution of debranched starch at a concentration in the range of 0,5 to l 5% w/w, most preferably in the range of 4 to l 2% wlw, at a temperature in the range from 20 to 90~C, most preferably from 40 to 70~C. Such a spray drying can be carried out15 with a spray nozzle or rotating disc having an inlet temperature in the range of 175 to 350~C and an outlet temperature in the range of 60 to l 35~C.

3. Test methods Despite the fact that drug dosage oral forms may be prepared in a multitude 20 of form, tablets obtained by direct compression have been chosen to evaluate and illustrate the sustained release properties of starch products according to the invention.
The sustained release property of the tablets made of starch products were evaluated using the following in vitro dissolution test.
rreparation of the tablets:
Tablets of 400 mg (diameter of 12 mm and thickness of 2.9 mm) containing 20% of acetamil1ophen as model drug, from 5 to 20% of Carl~opol 940(1_~ or from 10 to 20% of hydroxypropyl-metl1yl cellulose (I IPMC) Kl OOM (A~elhocel(~ and from 30 60 to 75% w/w of starch products according of the present invention were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of the drug and excipients in a die havil1g flat-face punclles, using a hydrau]ic press at 2.4 T/cm2.

CA 022ll778 l997-08-l4 In vit~o tablet dissolution Method No. 1: Dissolution in phosl~llate buffer Tablets were placed individually in I L of phospl1ate buffer in accordance with USP 23 p. 1791 (text <711>, 37~C at pH = 7) in a Distelc dissolution apparatus 5 equipped with paddles rotating at 50 rpm. The drug release was monitored spectrophotometrically at 244 nm, recorded and analysed with a T-lewlett Packarddissolution system.

Method No. 2: Dissolution in a solution containing 18nO0 EU of a-amylase Tablets were placed ;ndividually in I L of phosphate buffer containing 18000 ~U of o~-amylase (one enzyme unit releases I mg of maltose into 3 minutes at 20~C
and pH G,9) in accordance with USP 23 p. 1791 (test <711>, 37~C at pl-l = 7) in a Distek dissolution apparatus equipped with paddles rotating, at 50 rpm. Tlle drug release was monitored spectropllotometrically at 244 nm, recorded and analysed with 15 a l-lewlett Packard dissolution system, Example 1 Preparation of gelatinized high amylose starch containing 70% w/w of amylose~ using a thermomechanical gelatini7~tion pretreatment followed bv a sprav drying Gelatiniz~tion High amylose starch containing 70 % w/w of amylose was first gelatinized.
To do so, 266 kg of an aqueous dispersion of 14 % solids w/w (based on the dry starch) was introduced at a rate of I Kg/min in a scraped-surface heat exchanger a 25 temperature in the range of 150 to I G0~C. The gelatinized product was recovered and maintained under agitation at 65~C until the next step.

Spray drying of the gelatinized high amylose starch The gelatinized product recovered from the previous step was diluted to 7%
30 of solids w/w (based on the dry starch) with hot soften potable water. The product was maintained at 50~C llnder agitation and sprayed in a Niro spray dryer model P6.3 CA 022ll778 l997-08-l4 havil1g a water evaporating capacity of 50 Kg/l1, equipped with a atomizer disc, with an inlet temperature of 300 ~C and an outlet temperature of 1 20~C.

EXAMPLE 2: Formulation of tablets with pregelatinized hi~h amylose starch (70% w/w of amylose) and Carhopol~) and with pregelatinized hi~h amylose starch (70% w/w of amylose) and Me~hocel(~

(a) Tablets of 400 mg (diameter of 12 mn and thickness of 2.9 Inm) 10 containing 20% w/w of acetaminophen as a model drug, 60 or 70 % w/w of pregeletani~ed high amylose starch and respectively 20 or l 0 or 5% w/w of Carbopol(~ 940 were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of these ingredients in a hydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. The in vilro dissolution method No. l described hereinabove was used to evaluate the sustained release properties of 15 the so-prepared tablets. The results are presented in Table 1.
(b) Tablets of 400 mg diameter of 12 mm and thickl1ess of 2.9 mm containing 20 % w/w of acetaminophen as model dl ug, 60 or 70 or 75 % of pregelatinized high amylose starch and respectively 20 or l O w/w Methocel~ (~IPMC Kl 00~1) were also prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of the ingredient in a 20 hydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. The in vitro dissolution method No. I describedl1ereinabove was used to evaluate tl1e sustail1ed release properties of tl~e so-prellared tablets. The results are presel1ted in Table l.

TABLII I

'I'ime required to release the following Excipients % of the initial drug Type of starchcontent of the tablet added (expressed In hours) 30% 50% 90%
Example 2a Pregelatinized5% 2.5 8 18 70~/O amyloseCarbopol s~cl~ cll Example 2a Pregelatinized10% 2.5 7 17 70% amyloseCarhopol starch Example 2a Pregelatinized20% 2.5 7 16 70% amyloseCarbopol starch Example 2h Pregelatinized10% IIPMC 3 10 24 70% amylose starch Example 2b Pregelatinized20% HPMC 3 10.5 26 70% amylose starch The dissolution te~t results presented in table I show tl1e unsuspected and the impressive sustained release properties of pregelatinized high amylose containing starch (containing 70 % of amylose).
The tablets containing 5 and 10 % of C'arl~0~ ) 940 that were recovered 15 after the dissolution test (25 hours), were practically unswollen. They were showing small cracks but had excellent mechanical properties (resistant and elastic). These cracks seemed to be filled by tlle viscous polymer added in the tablets formulation, thereby permitting to obtain a quas; zero order drug release without profile fluctuation. As a matter of fact, the addition of S % of Carbopol 940 in the preparation of acetaminopl1en tablets was sufficient to fill the small cracks formed in the tablets. However, tlle addition of more than 5 % of Carhopol(~ slightly increase the drug release rate. In fact, tablets containing 20 % of Ca~boJ701(~) were almost completely eroded at the end of the dissolution (after 16 hollrs or immersion).
Drug release from tablets made of pregelatinized high amylose starch and HPMC KIOOM was even more striking. In fact, the time required to release 90 % ofthe initial acetaminophen tablet content was about 25 hours. ~s reported for tablets 10 containing CaYbopol~, tablets recovered after connpletion of the dissolution test (almost 40 hours) were practically unswollen. They were showing small cracks buthad excellent mechanical properties (resistant and elastic). The addition of at least 10 % of HPMC was sufficient to fill the small cracks of the tablets, thereby permitting to obtain a quasi ~ero order drug release without profile fluctuation. The 15 addition of more thall l O % of l IPMC seemed not to have an important effect on the drug release and mechanical properties of tablets.
This example fully illustrates the sustained release properties of pregelatinized higll amylose starch containing 70 % of amylose, as produced by the aqueous process according to the present h1vention.
Tablets prepared without viscous agent and tested in vil~o still had drug sustained release properties but showed fracturing after a few hours (4 to 8 hours) of immersion in the dissol~ltion medium. Thereby, some fluctuation in the drug release profile was observed. As demonstrated hereinbefore, the addition of a low quantity of viscous agent improves the linearity of the drug release profile. One skilled of the 25 art will know that the beneficial effect of Ca~bopol(~ 940 or E~PMC Kl OOM on the drug release linearity may also be obtained with many other viscous polymers. I le or she wi]l also knows that the amount of viscous agent needed to obtain the beneficial effect will depend on the dosa~e form (tablet, pellet, beds), 011 the nature andquantity of drug and, of course, on the viscous agent used.

EXAMPLI~ 3: Preparation of yelatinized high amylose starch (containin~ 50 % w/w of amylose) usin~ a thermomechanical ~elatilli7~tion pretreatment followed by spray drying Gelatini7~tion T ligh amylose starch containillg 50 % w/w of amylose was Flrst gelatinized.
I o do so, 323 kg of an aqueous dispersion of 7 % solids w/w (based on the dry starcll) was introduced at a rate of I Kg/min hl a scraped-surface heat exchanger a temperature in the range of l 50 to 1 60~C. The gelatinized product was recovered and maintained under agitation at 65~C until the next step.

Spray drying of the gelatinized hi~h amylose starch The gelatinized product recovered from the previous step (7% of solids w/w based on the dry starch) was maintailled at 55~C under agitation and spray-dried in a Niro spray dryer model P6.3 having an inlet temperature of 300~C and an outlet temperature of 1 00~C.

EXAMrLE 4: Formulation of tablets with pre~elatinized high amylose starch (50 % w/w of amylose) and Carhopol@~ and with pregelatinized hi~h amylose starch (50% w/w of amylose! and Methocel(~J

(a) Tablets of 400 mg (diameter 12 mm and thickness of 2.9 mm) containing 80 mg of acetaminophen as model drug, 300 mg of pregelatinized high amylose starch (containing 50 % w/w of amylose) and 20 mg of Carbol~ol(~ 940 were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of these ingredients in ahydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. Tlle in ~ ro dissolution method No. 1 described hereinabove was used to evaluate the sustained release properties of the so-prepared tablets. The results are presented in Table Tl.
(b) Tablets of 400 mg (12 mm diameter and thickness of 2.9 mm) containing 80 mg of acetaminophen as model drug, 280 mg of pregelatinized high amylose starch (containing 50% w/w of amylose) and 40 mg of Me~hocel(~ (I IPMC Kl OOM) CA 022ll778 l997-08-l4 were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of these ingredients in a hydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. The i)? ~ ro dissolution method No. l herein described was used to evaluate the sustained r elease properties of the so-prepared tablet. The results are presented in Table Il.

TABLE Il Time required to release the following Excipients% of the initial drug Type of starch content of the tablet added(expressed in hours) 30% 60% 90%
Example 4aPregelatinized 50%5% 2 6 14 amylose starch Carbopol Example 4bPregelatinized 50%l 0% 1 IPMC 2 7 ] 7 amylose starch The dissolution test results presented in Table Il sho that pregelatinized high amylose starch containing 50% amylose possess also unsuspected sustained releaseproperties. l lowever, the drug release rrom tablets made of ti1ese starch was faster than the one obtained with pregelatinized starch containing 70% of amylose, thereby suggesting that the higher is the amylose content, the better will be the sustained release properties.
The tablets containing 5% of Ca~ bopol(~ and 10% of T IPMC that were recovered after the dissolution test, were practically unswollen. They were showing mucl1 more small cracks but still had good mechanical properties (resistant and elastic). Thus, the addition of C'ur1~opol(f~ or l-IPMC permits to fill the tablets cracks and to obtain a quasi zero order drug release without profile fluctuation.
Drug release from tablets made of pregelatinized starch containing 50 % of amylose and lO ~/0 of HPMC KIOOM was longer than the one obtained from tablets .

containil1g Carbopol(~. In fact, the time required to release 90 % of the initial acetalllinopllen tablet contel1t was about 17 llours.

EXAMPLE 5: Preparation of gelatinized starch contailling about 20 % of amYlose using a thermomechanical gel~tiniz~ion pretreatment followed by a spray drying The purpose of this example is to compare the sustained release properties of starch produced by the process according to this invention and to demonstrate the 1 0 beneficial effect of amylose on such properties.

Gel~tini7~tion Common starch containing about 20 % w/w of amylose was first gelatini%ed.
To do so, 109 kg of an aqueous dispersion of 8 % solids w/w (based on the dry 1 5 starch) was introduced at a rate of I Kg/min in a scraped-surface heat exchal1ger a temperature in the range of 135 to 145~C. The gelatinized common starch was recovered and maintail1ed under agitation at a 60~C until the next step.

Spray dryin~ of the gelatinized common starch The gelatinized common starch recovered rrom the previous step (8 % w/w based on the dry starch) was maintained at a temperature in the range of 50 to 60~C
under agitation and spray dried in a Niro spray dyer model P6.3 having an inlet temperature of 280~C and an outlet temperature of 126~C.

I~XAMPLE 6: Formulation of tablets with pregelatinized common starch and Ca1 bopol~ and with pregelatinized common starch and Melhoce~

(a) Tablets of 400 mg (diameter of 12 mm and thickness of 2.9 mm) containing 20 % of acetaminophen as a model drug, 75 % of pregelatinized common starch and 5 % of Carbopol(~ 940 were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of these ingredients in a hydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. The jM vilro dissolution method No. l desctibed hereinabove was used to evaluate the sustained release properties of the so prepared tablets containing the pregelatinized common starch prepared in example 5. The results are presented in Table III
(b) Tablets of 400 mg (diameter of l 2 mm and thickness of 2.9 mm) 5 contail1ing 20% w/w of acetaminopl1en as a model drug, 70% w/w of coml11on starch and 10% w/w of Met1?ocel(~) of HPMC Kl OOM) were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of these ingredients in a hydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. The in vi~ro dissolution method No. I described hereinabove was used to evaluate the sustained release properties of tl1e so-prepared tablets. The results are 10 presented in Table III.

TABLE III

Time required to release the following Excipients% of the initial drug Type of starch content of the tablet added(expressed in hours) 30% 60% 90%
Example 6aPregelatinized 20%5% 2 6 l l amylose starch Carbopol Example 6bPregelatinized 20%l 0% HPMC 2 7 l 5 amylose starch As it is reported in the prior art, tablets made of gelatinized starch contail1ing 20 about 20 % of amylose and about 80 % of amylopectin are able to provide sustained release. I lowever, as it was the case with pregelatini~ed high amylose starch containing 50 and 70 % of amylose, tablets recovered after the dissolution test, had some cracks. The drug release from tablets made according both formulations using Carbopol(~) or HPMC was faster than the one from tablets made of pregelatinized 25 starch containing 50 and 70 % of amylose. Il1 fact, the time required to release 90 %
of the initial acetaminophen from tablets n1ade of pregelatinized common starch containing 10 % of HPMC was about l S hours as compared to 24 hours witll tablets made of pregelatinized starch containing 70 % of alnylose. Th;s result confirms that the role and quantity of amylose are decisive for achieving proper sustained release properties.

EXAMPLE 7: Preparation of debranched starch followed by spray drying High amylose starch was used as starting material in this example. However, use could also be made of waxy maize starch containing 95 % w/w of amylopectill or of common starch containing from 20 to 50 % of amylose as starting materials.

Gel~tini7.:~tion High amylose starch containing 70 % w/w of amylose was first gelatinized.
To do so, 300 kg of an aqueous dispersion of 15 % solids w/w (based on the dry starch) was introduced at a rate of I Kg/min in a scraped-surface heat exchanger at a temperature in tbe range of 150 to 1 60~C. The gelatinized product was recoveredand maintained under agitation at 70~C until the next step.

I-lydrolysis of amylopectin molecules using Pullulanase l O0 kg of gelatini~ed high amylose starch recovered from the previous step was transfer to a 200 L GO~VEC reactor tank. The temperature of the medium was cooled to 60~C and the pl-T was adjustecl at 5. Promozyme 200 l, (Novo-Nordisk) was added in order to obtain a Pullulanase enzyme concentration of 3 % v/w basedon the dry weight of the gelatinized higll amylose starch. The temperature was adjusted to 55~C and the hydrolysis was carried out for about 20 hours. Then, the reaction medium was diluted with l O0 kg of soften potable water at 60~C and the pH
was adjusted at 6.3. The debranching reaction was ended by heatillg the resulting debranched starch at 90~C for 20 minutes.

Thermal treatment of the debranched starch The slurry of debranched starch recovered from the previous step was thermally treated in a scraped-surface heat exchanger at a temperature in the range of 150 to 160~C. The aqueous heat-treated debranched starch was maintained under agitation at 65~C until its subsequellt dehydlatioll by spray dryillg.

Spray drying of the aqueous suspension of debranched starch The debranched starch recovered from the previous step (containing 7.5 % of solids w/w based on the dry starch) was kept at 65~C under agitation and spray dried in a Niro spray dryer model P6.3 having an inlet temperature of 300~C and an outlet temperature of 1 00~C.

10 EXAMPLE 8: Tablets formulatiol1 with debranched starch and Me~hocel~

(a) Tablets of 400 mg (diameter of 12 mm and thickness of 2.9 mm) containing 20% w/w of acetaminophen as a model drug, 75% w/w of debranched starch and 5% of Carl~opol~ 940 were prepared by direct compression of a mixture15 the powders of these ingrediellt.s in a hydraulic press at 2.4 T/c1112. l~he in vitro dissolution method No.l described hereinabove was used to evaluate the sustainedrelease properties of the tablets prepared with the debranched starch of example 7.
The results are presented in Table TV.
(b) Tablets of 400 mg (diameter of 12 mm and thickness of 2.9 mm) 20 containing 20% w/w of acetaminophen as a model drug, 70% w/w of debranched starch and 10% w/w of A~ethocel'~J HPMC KlOOM) were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of these ingredients in a hydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. The in vilro dissolution method No. 1 described hereinabove was used to evaluate the sustained release properties of the so-prepared tablets. The results are 25 presented in Table IV.

TAI~LE IV

Time required to release the following Excipients% of the initial drug Type of starch content of the tablet added (expressed in hours) 30% 60% 90%
Example 8aPregelatinized 5% 3 9 22 debranched starch Carbopol Example 8bPregelatinized 10% HPMC 4 11 28 debranched starch The dissolution test results presented in table IV sl1ow the unsllspected and striking sustained release properties of debranched starch subjected to thermal 10 dehydration (spray drying). The tablets made of debranched starch containing 5 % of Carbopol(~ or 10 % of HPMC recovered after the dissolution test were practicallyunswollen. They were showing small cracks but still had good mechanical properties (resistant and elastic).
The addition of Carbopol(~) or HPMC permits to fill the tablets cracks and to 15 obtain a quasi zero order drug release without profiles fluctuation. The drug release from tablets made of debranched starch containil1g I-lPMC Kl OOM was longer thanthe one from tablets made with Carbopol~. In fact, the time required to release 90 % of the drug from tablets containing HPMC is very impressive, as it was about 28 hours.
EXAMPLE 9: Comparison of sustained release properties of starches prepared accordin~ to this invention in a dissolution medium containing 18000 UE of alpha-amylase A comparison was made of the drug dissolution profiles of 400 nng tablets containing 80 mg of acetaminophen (20% w/w), 20 mg of Carbopol(~ (5% w/w) and 300 mg (75% w/w) of pregelatinized high amylose starch (prepared as disclosed in example l and containing 70 % of amylose); or 300 mg (75% w/w) of pregelatinized higll amylose statch (prepared as disclosed in exalnple 3 and containing 50 % oramylose); or 300 mg (75% w/w) of pregelatinized common starch (prepared as disclosed irl example 7 and containing about 20 % of amylose);
or 300 mg (75% w/w) of debrancl1ed starch (prepared as disclosed in example 5 and containing about 70 % of long cllain amylose and 30 % o~short cllain amylose).
The tablets were prepared by direct compression of a mixture of powders of these ingredients in a hydraulic press at 2.4 T/cm2. The in v7~ro dissolution method No. 2 described hereinabove was used to evaluate the sustained release properties of the so-prepared tablets. The resistance of the starch product to alpha-amylase is presented in Table V.
TABLE V

Time required to release the follow;ng Excipients% of the initial drug Type of starch content of the tablet added(expressed in hours) 30% 60% goo/0 Prepared as Pregelatinized 20% 5% 2 4.5 7 20in Example 5 amylose starchCarbopol Prepared as Pregelatinized 50% 5% Carbopol 2 5 l l in Example 3 amylose starch Prepared as Pregelatinized5% Carbopol 2 7 17 in Example 1 70% amylose starch 25Prepared as Pregelatinized5% Carbopol 3 9 22 in Example 7 debranched starch Tllis example illustrates the high enzymatic resistance of starches rich in amylose content prepared by the aqueous process according to the invention. Tablets 5 resistance to a-amylase increased when the ratio amylose/amylopectin increased.
Tablets made of pregenatinized 20% amylose starch (common starch) were badly affected by the enzyme and, as a result, the time requested to release 90% of the drug dropped from l l to 7 hours. Tablets made of pregelatinized 50% amylose starch were slightly affected by the enzyme and the time requested to release 90% of the 10 drug dropped from 14 to 1 1 hours. Tablets made of pregelatinized 70% amylosestarcll were practically not affected by the enzyme (from 18 to l 7 hours) and tablets made of debranched starch were the most resistant and were not afFected by a-amylase. This high tablet resistance to enzyme is believed to be related to the property of the amylose chain to retrograde on hydration. The retrograded gel phase 15 limits the subsequent tablet swelling, the drug diffusion and the enzymatic amylolysis. As it is reported in the art, retrograded pregelatinized starch are not attacked by o~-amylase in the gastrointest;nal tract. Thereby, the in vivo drug release will be independent of the fluctuation of the a-amylase in the human intestine.

Of course, numerous modifications could be made to the present invention as disclosed and exemplified hereinabove, without departing from the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A process for the manufacture of an excipient useful for the controlled release of an active agent, comprising the steps of:
a) providing a starting material selected from the group consisting of starch and high amylose starch;
b) subjecting the starting material to a gelatinization in an aqueous medium;
c) when the starting material consists of starch having an amylose content of less than 50% by weight, subjecting said gelatinized material to an enzymatic debranching treatment so as to obtain a gelatinized debranched starch having a short amylose chain content of at least 50% by weight; and when the starting material consists of starch having an amylose content of at least 50% by weight or of a high amylose starch having an amylose content up to 80% by weight, optionally subjecting said gelatinized material to an enzymatic debranching treatment so as to obtain a gelatinized debranched starch having a short amylose chain content of 20% to 50% by weight, and d) subjecting the gelatinized and optionally debranched starch to a thermal dehydration in order to obtain the requested excipient in form of a powder.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein:
in step b), the gelatinization consists of a thermo-mechanical treatment of an aqueous dispersion of the starting material.

3. The process of claim 2, wherein the aqueous dispersion contains from 1 to 20% by weight of the starting material and the thermo-mechanical treatment of this aqueous dispersion is carried out in a scraped-surface heat exchanger at a temperature ranging from 110 to 160°C for 5 to 60 minutes.

4. The process of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein:
in step a), use is made of starch as starting material; and in step c), the enzymatic debranching treatment is carried out with pullulanase at a pH in the range of 3.5 to 6 and a temperature in the range of 35 to 65°C for 1 to 24 hours.

5. The process of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein:
in step d), the thermal dehydration is achieved by spray-drying of the gelatinized and eventually debranched material in the form of a solution that contains from 0.5 to 15% by weight of said material and is at a temperature of 20 to 90°C.

6. The process of claim 5, wherein the spray-drying is carried out with a spray-nozzle or rotating disc having an inlet temperature of 175 to 350°C and an outlet temperature of 60 to 135°C.

7. The process of claim 6, wherein the solution contains from 4 to 12% by weight of the gelatinized and eventually debranched material and is at a temperature of 40 to 70°C.

8. The process of any one of claims 1 to 7, comprising the additional step of:
c') prior to carrying out step d), subjecting the gelatinized and eventually debranched material to a thermal treatment at a temperature higher than 100°C.

9. The process of any one of claims 1 to 8, comprising the additional steps of:
e) subjecting the powder obtained in step d) to a granulation.

10. The process of claim 9, wherein, in step e), the granulation is a wet granulation carried out in a fluid bed or high shear granulator.

11. The process of claim 9, wherein, in step e), the granulation is a dry granulation carried out in a roller compaction apparatus.

12. The process of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein:
in step a), the starting material that is provided is a high amylose starch containing at least 50% by weight of amylose.

13. The process of claim 12, wherein the high amylose starch used as starting material contains 70% by weight of amylose.

14. The process of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein:
in step a), the starting material that is provided is a common or waxy starch.

15. The process of claim 14, wherein said common or waxy starch is cross-linked or substitute.

16. An excipient useful for the controlled release of an active agent, said excipient being in the form of a powder and being obtained by the process of any one of claims 1 to 15.

17. A dosage administration form for the sustained release of at least one active agent in the form of a powder, said form comprising said at least one active agent in admixture with an excipient as claimed in claim 16, said excipient being present in such an amount as to achieve the requested sustained release.

18. The dosage form of claim 17, containing at least 20% by weight of said excipient.

19. The dosage form of claim 17, containing at least 60% by weight of said excipient.

20. The dosage form of claim 17, containing at least 94% by weight of said excipient.

21. The dosage form of claim 18 or 19, further containing up to 40% by weight a polymer that becomes viscous in the presence of water and thus may fill cracks formed in the form during its dissolution.

22. The dosage form of claim 21, wherein said polymer is selected from the group consisting of Carbopol R and Methocel R.

23. The dosage form of claim 22, wherein said polymer is Carbopol R and is present in an amount of about 5% by weight.

24. The dosage form of claim 22, wherein said polymer is Methocel R and is present in an amount of about 10% by weight.

25. The dosage form of any one of claims 17 to 24, which is in the form of a tablet for oral administration.