CA1247402A - Porous metal abradable seal material - Google Patents
Porous metal abradable seal materialInfo
- Publication number
- CA1247402A CA1247402A CA000470201A CA470201A CA1247402A CA 1247402 A CA1247402 A CA 1247402A CA 000470201 A CA000470201 A CA 000470201A CA 470201 A CA470201 A CA 470201A CA 1247402 A CA1247402 A CA 1247402A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- seal
- percent
- alloy
- density
- metal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 65
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 229910001120 nichrome Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 229910000990 Ni alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 8
- 229910001092 metal group alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229940000425 combination drug Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000601 superalloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910001069 Ti alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 4
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 abstract description 23
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 abstract description 13
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 229920003229 poly(methyl methacrylate) Polymers 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 11
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 235000019589 hardness Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 229920001225 polyester resin Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 239000004645 polyester resin Substances 0.000 description 4
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000007751 thermal spraying Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920005479 Lucite® Polymers 0.000 description 2
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910000767 Tm alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- VNNRSPGTAMTISX-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromium nickel Chemical compound [Cr].[Ni] VNNRSPGTAMTISX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QDOXWKRWXJOMAK-UHFFFAOYSA-N dichromium trioxide Chemical compound O=[Cr]O[Cr]=O QDOXWKRWXJOMAK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- WKBOTKDWSSQWDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Bromine atom Chemical compound [Br] WKBOTKDWSSQWDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000883 Ti6Al4V Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052770 Uranium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003082 abrasive agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- CFQGDIWRTHFZMQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N argon helium Chemical compound [He].[Ar] CFQGDIWRTHFZMQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010953 base metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- GDTBXPJZTBHREO-UHFFFAOYSA-N bromine Substances BrBr GDTBXPJZTBHREO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052794 bromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001739 density measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000856 hastalloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001026 inconel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000007373 indentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052755 nonmetal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002843 nonmetals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004482 other powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013618 particulate matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007750 plasma spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920003210 poly(4-hydroxy benzoic acid) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910010271 silicon carbide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005245 sintering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004580 weight loss Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16J—PISTONS; CYLINDERS; SEALINGS
- F16J15/00—Sealings
- F16J15/44—Free-space packings
- F16J15/445—Free-space packings with means for adjusting the clearance
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C1/00—Making non-ferrous alloys
- C22C1/08—Alloys with open or closed pores
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C4/00—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge
- C23C4/04—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge characterised by the coating material
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C4/00—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge
- C23C4/18—After-treatment
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
- F01D11/00—Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages
- F01D11/08—Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between rotor blade tips and stator
- F01D11/12—Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between rotor blade tips and stator using a rubstrip, e.g. erodible. deformable or resiliently-biased part
- F01D11/122—Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between rotor blade tips and stator using a rubstrip, e.g. erodible. deformable or resiliently-biased part with erodable or abradable material
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Coating By Spraying Or Casting (AREA)
- Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)
- Sealing Using Fluids, Sealing Without Contact, And Removal Of Oil (AREA)
- Sealing Material Composition (AREA)
Abstract
Porous Metal Abradable Seal Material Abstract Porous metal structures are especially useful as abradable seals in axial flow compressors. Care-fully defined oxide content and density provide a superior combination of abradability and particulate erosion resistance. The seals are comprised of 1-30 weight percent oxide and have 27-38 percent of the solid metal density. A preferred seal is made by plasma arc spraying a mixture of 80Ni-20Cr and polymethylmethacrylate powders and then heating the resultant deposit in air to about 315°C to cause the polymer to flee. The nichrome seal will have less than 15 percent oxide and a density of about 2.7 g/cm3, about 32 percent of the solid metal density.
Description
~Z~7~0~
Porous Metal Abradable Seal Material Technical Field The present invention relates to the field of porous metal structures, particularly those useful as abradable seals in turbomachinery.
Background Abradable seals are used in turbomachinery to maintain the closest clearances between spinning blades and the surrounding case structure. They are comprised of materials which are particularly adapted to fragment and disappear when contacted by the blade tips which are spinning at high speeds.
As generally mentioned in U.S. Pats. No. 3,879,831 to Rigney et al and 3,084,064 to Couden et al, abradable seals must have a peculiar combination of properties. On the one hand they must be resistant to erosion from the high velocity gas streams which at times carry fine particulate matter with them. On the other hand, they must be capable of disintegrating when contacted by the tip of a high speed blade, so that the tip of the blade is not substantially de-graded~ This mode of behavior is highly desirable because if the rotating parts and surrounding casing come together too closely at one point around the circumference, it is here in the casing that the wear should take place. When this is not so and when the blade tips wear, then the clearance between the blades and case will be increased all around the circumference, 7~
with the result that the leakage is greatly in-creased beyond that which would occur with a properly functloning abradable seal.
The foregoing is only a simplified description of the properties which abradable seal must have. It must also of course be structurally sound to resis-t failure at points other than where the blade is con-tacting it, it must resist the thermal and vibratory strains imposed on it by its use, it must be readily fabricated in a reproducible and cost effective manner, and so forth. Considerable effort has gone into the development of abradable seals which have the desired combination of properties and the present invention is reflective of that continuing effort.
In the past, abradable materials have been com-prised of heterogeneous combinations of non-metals and metals, as described in the patents mentioned above; or, as porous structures, obtained by use of a fugitive material in the precursor article. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,269,903 to Clingman et al and U.S.
Pat. No. 3,540,884 to Horbury.
The present invention is concerned with the last men-tioned process, and particularly with seals which are used in the compressor part of a gas turbine engine. Typically, compressor blades are made out of titanium, nickel or iron base alloys. Operating temperatures range from a few hundred degrees up to 540C. The abradable seal material is generally applied to a substrate structure, most commonly a circumferential ring attached to the casing. In the 7~0~2 prior art, pressing and sintering and other powder metallurgical techniques have been used together with -thermal spraying to make porous structures. Metals can be sprayed with densities as low as 75-80% by plasma arc spraying them alone, with the correct set of parameters. However, to obtain densities less than this, which are found to be desirable for abradable seals, it is necessary to incorporate a non-metallic material. Most preferably a fugitive material such as a water soluble salt or a volatilizable polymer is sprayed with the metal and removed in a second operation. For instance, an abradable seal structure can be made by spraying a polyester resin and a nichrome metal, generally along the lines taught by Longo et al in V.S. Pat. No.
3,723,165, and then removing the polyester by heating the resultant structure to a temperature of about 540C in air.
However, the metal abradable seals made pre-viously have not exhibited a fully satisfactory set of properties. In some instances, the abradability will be good but the mechanical str ngth, and in par-ticular the erosion resistance, will be inadequate.
When parametric and material changes are made to in-crease the latter property, then the abradabilityis insufficient and excessive blade wear takes place. Because of the complex dynamics of engine operaticns and the high cost of testing materials by running them in an actual engine, the simplified specimen testing which has been employed has not lead ~4~4~3~J
to the easy identification of materials which are good and materials which are inferior.
Disclosure of Invention An object of the invention is to provide as - 5 the abradable portion of a seal component for a turbomachine a material which has a superior combina-tion of abradability and erosion resistance. Another object of the invention is to delineate the configurations of nichrome seal materials which are most advantageous for durability.
The present invention results in an improved abradable seal throush control of the key variables of oxide content and density. Seals in accord with the invention are comprised of high temperature alloys having a relatively low density (high apparent porosity) and a specific maximum oxide content. The oxide content should be maintained below about 30 weight percent, preferably 1-15 percent.. Normally oxidation is a contributor to embrittlement of metals and this would be thought to be good in increasing abradability (which is the ability of a material to easily disintegrate when contacted by another, e.g. a blade tip). While the contrary is found to be true, higher oxygen contents are permissible with lower densities of materials.
However, the density must be maintained above at least about 27% because particulate erosion drastically increases when lower densities are used.
Thus, seals ln accord with the invention will have apparent densities in the range of 27-38%
of the metal which is sprayed and will have an oxide content of less than about 30%, preferably 1-15%.
The apparent density is found by measuring the seal material density compared to the theoretical density of the solid metal and it is influenced by the oxide content. Preferably the seal is 29-32% dense and more preferably it is 30-32~. Another measure of a 10, good seal is the superficial hardness. Nichrome seals will have a Rockwell Z10 hardness of 45-85, typically 60-75.
The seals are preferably made of thermal sprayed coarser powder, with -250 mesh powder pre-ferred over -325 mesh powder because of lower oxide content tendencies. Also, the preferred seals have pores with spherical section shapes since these are associated with seals having lower oxide contents.
Seals of the invention perform substantially better than prior art seals which were not controlled so closely with respect to the combination of density and oxide content. Not only are the new seals durable under erosion but they have very favorable high wear rate characteristics when contacted with a relatively r~tating turbomachinery part.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of preferred embodiments and accompanying drawings.
-5.1-Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 is a graph showing the influence of oxide content and density on abradability, as measured by the tendency of a rubbed seal to glaze.
Figure 2 is a graph showing how the erosion of a seal subjected to a particulate stream is dependent on density.
~Z~7~LO~
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention The best mode of the invention is described in terms of the alloy comprised by weight percent of 80 Ni and 20 Cr. This alloy, called nichrome hereln, is one composition of a general series of known nichrome alloys. These alloys are dominantly nickel and have contained within them chromium and other ele~ents.
Traditionally, they have been preferred alloys for electric resistance heating elements because of cost, high temperature strength and oxidation resistance and formability. The invention will be generally applic-able to other wrought non-hardenable nickel base alloys, including well-known Hastelloy TM alloys(Cabot Corpora-tion) and Inconel TM alloys (Inco Ltd). As indicated below, the invention is also applicable to hardenable nickel alloys, particularly those strengthened by a gamma prime phase. ~ased on related experience the invention will be pertinent to other high temperature and heat resisting alloys based on nickel, iron, cobalt and ~0 mixtures thereof.
In use, an abradable seal for an engine is generally comprised of the porous metal structure with which the invention is concerned and an attached support piece, us~ally made of a superalloy. These are referred to in the references mentioned in the Background. When we refer to an abradable seal herein, we refer to the porous metal part thereof.
.
7~0;~
As indicated above, the invention involves control of the structure and chemical composition of porous metals. Figure 1 shows seal abrading tes-t data which was accumulated for various porous metal seals in the making of the invention, as measured by the presence or absence of glazing. The glazing test is a modeling of the conditions to which an abradable seal is subje~ted when it is used in the compressor section of a gas turbine engine.
In the test several titanium blade shapes, usually six, are mounted radially around the periphery of a disc and rotated at high speeds so that their tip velocity is about 290m/s. The six blade test is contrasted with a single blade test which does not produce identical results insofar as slazins is concerned. Abradable material, generally in a 60 arc shape having about 0.1 m radius is positioned proximite to the rotating tips of blade models and is moved relatively toward the center of blade rotation. The blade models are 1.5 mm thick paddles made of Ti-6Al-4V. The rate and depth of engagement are controlled, with typical parameters being an engagement rate of about 0.05 mm/s and a depth of engagement of about 1 mm, in a room temperature test. The loss of abradable seal material and that from the blade is measured. Of course, the preferred result is that hardly any material is removed from the blade tip and good seals are deemed to be present when the wear of the tip is relatively low, of the order of 0.05 mm or less. Such seals are deemed to have good abradability.
This means that the seal is characterized by tending to easily disintegrate in a friahle mode when it is contacted by a high speed moving part, such as a blade tip. In the absence of such easy disin-tegration behavior, the tip of the blade will be excessively heated and degraded itself.
A correlation has been made over the course of extensive testing experience in that when there is excessive removal of material from blades there is also associated therewith a characteristic appearance in the seal where it has been rubbed by the blade. When the abradability of the seal material is poor, it is round that the surface of the seal is left with a relatively shiny metallic appearance. In contrast, for abradable materials which are good in being sacrificial, the rubbed surface has a dull grayish appearance, more or less similar to the appearance it had prior to the test. lWhen glazing results it evidently is a manifestation of a substantial change in mode of interaction as there tends to be a substantial increase in relative wear. Blade wear up to 0.5 mm might be encountered. Volume Wear Ratio lVWR) is a parameter used by some to measure abradability, being the ra-tio of seal volume removal compared to the volume of blade removal. Here again, only substantial changes are meaningful in significantly distinguishing seals. By example, the 0.05 mm blade wear in our six blade test is about equal to a 7~
VWR of 25~; ratios more than that are good; those less than that, e.g., around 100 are poor. For less meaningful single blade rub tests a good VWR
is greater than 10 while a poor VWR is less than 10.) The basic purpose of the seal is to circum-scribe a rotor of many blades and to prevent the passage of gases around the tip ends. Only under transients and atypical operation do the blade tips contact the seal. Thus, a prime requisite of seals is that they have adequate mechanical strength and resistance to particulate erosion, e.gO, sand particles carried in the air. Thus, there is a second test which is utilized to evaluate the per-lS formance of abradable seal materials. This iscomprised of an erosion test in which the abradable seal material is impacted by a sandblast, or air stream carrying abrasive particulates. The relative performance of materials is ranked in this test, based on the amount of material which is removed from the surface of an abradable material per unit volume of abrasive material impacted on the surface. Typical standard conditions comprise impacting the seal at a 15-20 angle with -250 Tyler Sieve Series mesh alumina grit carried in a 240 m/s velocity stream of 650C air.
Figures 1 and 2 respectively show representative data from the abradability test and the erosion test. In Figure 1, data from tests conducted as described above show that the combinations of density and oxide content to the left of the solid curved line are representative of good abradable materials while those to the right, at higher density and higher oxide content, are less good in that they 5 have glazed. Referring to Figure 2, it is seen that there is a tendency towards greatly increased erosion as the density is clecreased. Thus there are conflicting tendencies insofar as density is concerned. Low density permits more latitude in oxide content but produces less erosion resistance.
As a corollary, it is necessary to hold oxide contents beneath certain maximum levels if good abradability is to be obtained. (There has been no significant effect observed for oxide content on erosion resistance.) From the data in the Figures it is seen that the density is preferably less than about 38~ and more than about 27~ and the preferred density is in the range of 29-34%. In practice we most prefer 30-32~. Densities greater than 38% will give good erosion resistance, they also mean that the oxide content must be maintained at a very low level, at less than 10%. While this is feasible and can be done as evidenced by the data, for fine NiCr powder an undesired inert atmosphere processing would be needed to assure it. The oxidation which occurs is a function of the oxide content of the powder~, the process of spraying, and the process of removal. The minimum oxide content of 0.5-1.5 weight percent is a characteristic of commercial powder. There is in-47~(3;2 evitably a strong preference for densities less than 38~.
Also, at very high densiti~s of 60-70% or more, the materlal tends to assume the properties of solid metal and does not abrade properly. The lowest density in the invention is controlled by practical considerations and what is deemed to be the maximum acceptable erosion rate which is a function of the environment anticipated. An erosion rate of about 15 cm3/kg has been deemed to be the maxlmum acceptable for long life commercial engines based on test experience. Thus the density ought to be greater than about 26-27~ based on Figure 2. Also, as a practical matter, more consistent and re-producible seals are made when densities are in thehigher ranges. Because of the break in the curve around 29-30~, values above this level are preferred.
The oxide content is desirably in the 1-15~
range but it may be in the 1-30% range, because of its interrelation with the density, according to the area A in Figure 1. Even higher oxide contents are usable but the resultant close control of density necessitated at the lower end of the useful density range makes this very undesired. The nature of industrial processes, even those closely controlled as are characteristic of the aerospace industry, mean there will be variations from part to part. (It also should be understood that there will be the usual variation of plus or minus of a percent or two applied to the limits herein because of variations 47~
from specimen to specimen and in analytical measurements.) The oxide content for -250 Tyler Sieve Series mesh NiCr powder is lower on average than -325 mesh powder, when the preferred poly-methylmethacrylate is used, as evident from Figure 1. Thus, the coarser powders are preferred in making our invention.
It is surprising that lowering oxygen content improves abradability inasmuch as it generally is thought that oxygen embrittles materials. Our investigation thus far is insufficient to illuminate all the underlying phenomena of the invention.
Certainly, the erosion rate data are understandable insofar as they represent a general trend of in-creasing erosion rate with decreasing density.
We have discovered that there is anotherparameter by which we can characterize the density of those materials which are good for abradable seal use from those which are not good. The superficial hardness of a smooth and cleanly machined seal is measured in a Rockwell machine, on the Rockwell Z10 scale (i.e., using a 19 mm dia ball and a 10 kg load). The degree of indentation is measured in the normal mode of Rockwell testing an~ correlated on an arbitrary relative scale. For nichrome, the hardness of useable gas turbine seals will fall in the range 45-85 and will most preferably be 50-75. Seals made with polymethyl-methacrylate work best at 60-75 while polyester ~ '7~
made seals work best at 50-65. Measuring the hardness is a convenient way of characterizing the material without the tediousness of measuring its density. Of course the hardness is not only a measure of density or porosity but of the intrinsic material strength. The nichrome particles of our plasma sprayed seals have about 240 VHN micro-hardness. Other materials we have sprayed and their hardnesses are NiCrAl-250; NiCrAl~-300;
FeCrAlY-320; CoCrAlY-630. Thus the general principles of our invention as they are elucidated for the superficial hardness of nichrome will be applied to other materials in accord with general principles of materials behavior.
The oxide content which is referred to herein is that which is measured chemically by a digestion technique familiar in conventional chemical analysis. For 80Ni-20Cr nichrome the article being tested is immersed in a solution of methanol and 5 volume percent bromine at a temperature of about 75C
to dissolve all the metallic content. The insoluble residue is weighed and is characterized as oxide, there being no insignificant other insolubles be-lieved present in sprayed nichrome deposits. The density which is referred to herein is an apparent density. By this is meant that the following procedure is used: An abradable specimen is weighed and its volume is determined to produce the specific gravity of the specimen. This is divided by the 74()~
specific gravity of the solid metal alloy, e.g., 80Ni-20Cr, to produce the density number which is used herein. However, it is recognized that to the extent the specimen contains oxide, and to the extent the oxide has a different density from the metal alloy, the density percent is not a true number. In fact, al-though the nichrome oxides have not been fully charac-terized by us and although the oxides are intimately mixed with the metallic content of an abradable struc-ture, the oxides are not believed to have a densitywhich is substantially different from the metal. ~For example, the specific gravity of Nio is 7.45; Ni is 8.9;
Cr2O3 is 5.2; Cr is 7.2; and 80Ni-20Cr is 8.4. Simple calculation will show that oxidized nichrome has a density which is about 90~ of the metal. Thus, even though our density numbers are not true numbers, the errors are relatively small and will not make signifi-cantly in error the density limits by which we define our invention, it being evident from the presentation and scatter of the supporting data that those limits are nominal.
The manner of making our abradable seals is described in detail in Canadian Application No. 470,200 filed on even date herewith by Eaton and Novak, two the inventors herein. To summarize, in the preferred practice of making our seals, plasma arc spraying or other thermal spraying process is used to deposit a mixture of metal and polymer powders.
The polymeris then caused -to flee from the deposit, leaving behind a porous metal structure. Any polymer or other fugitive which achieves the objects of the invention, namely the desired density and oxide content, may be used. However, we have found that a polymer which depolymerizes is preferred. This is contrasted with the older techniques where a higher temperature polymer is used and where it must be removed by oxida-tion. When the polymer is of a type necessitatingheating to a high temperature, the deposit can oxidize unduly. Furthermore, when the polymer is removed by oxidation, we have found that temperatures can exceed those of the nominal furnace temperature to which the specimen is subjected. For instance, if a polyester resin such as polyparaoxybenzoyl (Ekonol TM of the Carborundum Company) is used, the metal-seal temperature will rise to the range of 625C when the furnace temper-ature is nominally 540C. Thus, polyester produces high oxide content in general and seals falling to the right of the line in Figure 1 will be erratic inso-far as glazing or not glazing. Preferably, we use poly-methylmethacrylate, such as Lucite TM grade 4FNC-99 powder (DuPont Company). This material is easily re-moved by heating the metal and polymer deposit to a temperature of about 315C for about 2hr, causing the polymer to convert to the volatile monomer.
In the preferred practice of making nichromeabradable materials, we spray 80-90 weight percent ~'7~
~16-nichrome with 20-10 polymethylmethacrylate. These mixtures, sprayed by plasma arc torch, produce deposits of 35-45 volume percent polymer, preferably 37-43 per-cent. The resultant metal deposits, after the polymer is caused to flee, have densities in the range of 30-50% of the base metal. As a specific example, 86 ni-chrome and 14 Lucite TM polymer are sprayed; (47:53 volume ratio). They do not necessarily deposit with the same efficiency. Weight loss measurement during re-moval of the fugitive polymer shows the deposit was 43volume percent polymer. Thus, the resultant structure is at least 32% void. Density measurement shows a value of 2.7 g/cm3, about 32% of the solid metal (8.4 g/cm3), meaning the apparent porosity is 68%.
This is greater than that provided by the polymer, and the variance is evidently due to the porosity of the metal-polymer deposit which is made by plasma spraying and the presence of oxide. We use plasma arc spraying with a Metco TM Model 7B gun in air with a 50-50 volumeof argon-helium mix-ture at an enthalpy of about 7 kwhr/m3 the powder being injected just downstream of the gun nozzle opening. Other aspects of application are with-in the known conventional practice~
Other thermal spraying techniques may be utilized to obtain the initialdeposit. Naturally, the process should not produce excess oxidation of the de-posit. But when we use the low temperature polymer, there is insignificant additional oxidation during 7~
the polymer removal process and substantial oxidation may be countenanced in the initial deposit. Conversely, high fugitive material removal temperatures can be used, so long as the initial oxidation is low or the material has inherent characteristics so that it does not obtain excessive oxidation. The data in Figure 1 show that it is difficult to obtain the desired result using the high temperature polyester resin which is re~erred to in the above mentioned patent to Longo et al, although such practice can be used if desired.
We obtain a more desirable seal structure when we use a meltable polymer, of which polymethyl-methacryla~e isthe preferred choice. In contrast, the polyester resin we refer to above does not appear to melt during spraying and gives a less open structure, as disclosed in the related application. Another measure of the advantage of the use of the meltable polymer is that the oxidation behavicr of the porous seal material is superior, compared to a virtually identical abradable seal material made with the non-melting polyester material. For instance, in 100 hr exposure to a temperature of 540C, the polyester-made -325 nichrome seal material wlll have an oxide co~tent of about ~0+% whereas the poly-methylmethacrylate-made material will have an oxide content of about 30+%. We do not exactly understand what phenomena underlies this, but we ~ believe it is related to the internal structure of the abradable material. As the photographs show '' `
in our related application, the polymethamethylacrylate material will assume a spherical shape during spraying whereas the non-melting polyester material has an irregular shaped surface. Since the frozen metal droplets presumably conform to the shape of the plastic with which they are in contact, the sur-face area of the abradable material made with the meltable polymer may be lower. Thus, our preferred seals have an internal pore shape which has spherical surface shapes. Since we cleslre to minimize oxide content, it follows that our preferred seals are made by a thermal spray method which provides them with internal pores having spherical surface sections.
Using a meltable polymer provides this result and makes easier the other parts of the manufacturing process.
Typically, the abradable material is sprayed onto a metal alloy substrate having a curved shape, such as IN 718nickel alloy or AISI 410 iron base alloy. The procedures followed to cause the abradable material to adhere to the substrate are those which are conventionally employed in plasma arc spraying, and special substrate treatments may be applied to achieve other objects than those to which the present invention is directed. While we have focused on the performance of seals for the com-pressor section of a gas turbine engine, where the temperatures of use are 650C or less, the principles of our invention will be useful in other parts of such machines, and in other machines.
Although this invention has been shown and de-scribed with respect to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention
Porous Metal Abradable Seal Material Technical Field The present invention relates to the field of porous metal structures, particularly those useful as abradable seals in turbomachinery.
Background Abradable seals are used in turbomachinery to maintain the closest clearances between spinning blades and the surrounding case structure. They are comprised of materials which are particularly adapted to fragment and disappear when contacted by the blade tips which are spinning at high speeds.
As generally mentioned in U.S. Pats. No. 3,879,831 to Rigney et al and 3,084,064 to Couden et al, abradable seals must have a peculiar combination of properties. On the one hand they must be resistant to erosion from the high velocity gas streams which at times carry fine particulate matter with them. On the other hand, they must be capable of disintegrating when contacted by the tip of a high speed blade, so that the tip of the blade is not substantially de-graded~ This mode of behavior is highly desirable because if the rotating parts and surrounding casing come together too closely at one point around the circumference, it is here in the casing that the wear should take place. When this is not so and when the blade tips wear, then the clearance between the blades and case will be increased all around the circumference, 7~
with the result that the leakage is greatly in-creased beyond that which would occur with a properly functloning abradable seal.
The foregoing is only a simplified description of the properties which abradable seal must have. It must also of course be structurally sound to resis-t failure at points other than where the blade is con-tacting it, it must resist the thermal and vibratory strains imposed on it by its use, it must be readily fabricated in a reproducible and cost effective manner, and so forth. Considerable effort has gone into the development of abradable seals which have the desired combination of properties and the present invention is reflective of that continuing effort.
In the past, abradable materials have been com-prised of heterogeneous combinations of non-metals and metals, as described in the patents mentioned above; or, as porous structures, obtained by use of a fugitive material in the precursor article. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,269,903 to Clingman et al and U.S.
Pat. No. 3,540,884 to Horbury.
The present invention is concerned with the last men-tioned process, and particularly with seals which are used in the compressor part of a gas turbine engine. Typically, compressor blades are made out of titanium, nickel or iron base alloys. Operating temperatures range from a few hundred degrees up to 540C. The abradable seal material is generally applied to a substrate structure, most commonly a circumferential ring attached to the casing. In the 7~0~2 prior art, pressing and sintering and other powder metallurgical techniques have been used together with -thermal spraying to make porous structures. Metals can be sprayed with densities as low as 75-80% by plasma arc spraying them alone, with the correct set of parameters. However, to obtain densities less than this, which are found to be desirable for abradable seals, it is necessary to incorporate a non-metallic material. Most preferably a fugitive material such as a water soluble salt or a volatilizable polymer is sprayed with the metal and removed in a second operation. For instance, an abradable seal structure can be made by spraying a polyester resin and a nichrome metal, generally along the lines taught by Longo et al in V.S. Pat. No.
3,723,165, and then removing the polyester by heating the resultant structure to a temperature of about 540C in air.
However, the metal abradable seals made pre-viously have not exhibited a fully satisfactory set of properties. In some instances, the abradability will be good but the mechanical str ngth, and in par-ticular the erosion resistance, will be inadequate.
When parametric and material changes are made to in-crease the latter property, then the abradabilityis insufficient and excessive blade wear takes place. Because of the complex dynamics of engine operaticns and the high cost of testing materials by running them in an actual engine, the simplified specimen testing which has been employed has not lead ~4~4~3~J
to the easy identification of materials which are good and materials which are inferior.
Disclosure of Invention An object of the invention is to provide as - 5 the abradable portion of a seal component for a turbomachine a material which has a superior combina-tion of abradability and erosion resistance. Another object of the invention is to delineate the configurations of nichrome seal materials which are most advantageous for durability.
The present invention results in an improved abradable seal throush control of the key variables of oxide content and density. Seals in accord with the invention are comprised of high temperature alloys having a relatively low density (high apparent porosity) and a specific maximum oxide content. The oxide content should be maintained below about 30 weight percent, preferably 1-15 percent.. Normally oxidation is a contributor to embrittlement of metals and this would be thought to be good in increasing abradability (which is the ability of a material to easily disintegrate when contacted by another, e.g. a blade tip). While the contrary is found to be true, higher oxygen contents are permissible with lower densities of materials.
However, the density must be maintained above at least about 27% because particulate erosion drastically increases when lower densities are used.
Thus, seals ln accord with the invention will have apparent densities in the range of 27-38%
of the metal which is sprayed and will have an oxide content of less than about 30%, preferably 1-15%.
The apparent density is found by measuring the seal material density compared to the theoretical density of the solid metal and it is influenced by the oxide content. Preferably the seal is 29-32% dense and more preferably it is 30-32~. Another measure of a 10, good seal is the superficial hardness. Nichrome seals will have a Rockwell Z10 hardness of 45-85, typically 60-75.
The seals are preferably made of thermal sprayed coarser powder, with -250 mesh powder pre-ferred over -325 mesh powder because of lower oxide content tendencies. Also, the preferred seals have pores with spherical section shapes since these are associated with seals having lower oxide contents.
Seals of the invention perform substantially better than prior art seals which were not controlled so closely with respect to the combination of density and oxide content. Not only are the new seals durable under erosion but they have very favorable high wear rate characteristics when contacted with a relatively r~tating turbomachinery part.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of preferred embodiments and accompanying drawings.
-5.1-Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 is a graph showing the influence of oxide content and density on abradability, as measured by the tendency of a rubbed seal to glaze.
Figure 2 is a graph showing how the erosion of a seal subjected to a particulate stream is dependent on density.
~Z~7~LO~
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention The best mode of the invention is described in terms of the alloy comprised by weight percent of 80 Ni and 20 Cr. This alloy, called nichrome hereln, is one composition of a general series of known nichrome alloys. These alloys are dominantly nickel and have contained within them chromium and other ele~ents.
Traditionally, they have been preferred alloys for electric resistance heating elements because of cost, high temperature strength and oxidation resistance and formability. The invention will be generally applic-able to other wrought non-hardenable nickel base alloys, including well-known Hastelloy TM alloys(Cabot Corpora-tion) and Inconel TM alloys (Inco Ltd). As indicated below, the invention is also applicable to hardenable nickel alloys, particularly those strengthened by a gamma prime phase. ~ased on related experience the invention will be pertinent to other high temperature and heat resisting alloys based on nickel, iron, cobalt and ~0 mixtures thereof.
In use, an abradable seal for an engine is generally comprised of the porous metal structure with which the invention is concerned and an attached support piece, us~ally made of a superalloy. These are referred to in the references mentioned in the Background. When we refer to an abradable seal herein, we refer to the porous metal part thereof.
.
7~0;~
As indicated above, the invention involves control of the structure and chemical composition of porous metals. Figure 1 shows seal abrading tes-t data which was accumulated for various porous metal seals in the making of the invention, as measured by the presence or absence of glazing. The glazing test is a modeling of the conditions to which an abradable seal is subje~ted when it is used in the compressor section of a gas turbine engine.
In the test several titanium blade shapes, usually six, are mounted radially around the periphery of a disc and rotated at high speeds so that their tip velocity is about 290m/s. The six blade test is contrasted with a single blade test which does not produce identical results insofar as slazins is concerned. Abradable material, generally in a 60 arc shape having about 0.1 m radius is positioned proximite to the rotating tips of blade models and is moved relatively toward the center of blade rotation. The blade models are 1.5 mm thick paddles made of Ti-6Al-4V. The rate and depth of engagement are controlled, with typical parameters being an engagement rate of about 0.05 mm/s and a depth of engagement of about 1 mm, in a room temperature test. The loss of abradable seal material and that from the blade is measured. Of course, the preferred result is that hardly any material is removed from the blade tip and good seals are deemed to be present when the wear of the tip is relatively low, of the order of 0.05 mm or less. Such seals are deemed to have good abradability.
This means that the seal is characterized by tending to easily disintegrate in a friahle mode when it is contacted by a high speed moving part, such as a blade tip. In the absence of such easy disin-tegration behavior, the tip of the blade will be excessively heated and degraded itself.
A correlation has been made over the course of extensive testing experience in that when there is excessive removal of material from blades there is also associated therewith a characteristic appearance in the seal where it has been rubbed by the blade. When the abradability of the seal material is poor, it is round that the surface of the seal is left with a relatively shiny metallic appearance. In contrast, for abradable materials which are good in being sacrificial, the rubbed surface has a dull grayish appearance, more or less similar to the appearance it had prior to the test. lWhen glazing results it evidently is a manifestation of a substantial change in mode of interaction as there tends to be a substantial increase in relative wear. Blade wear up to 0.5 mm might be encountered. Volume Wear Ratio lVWR) is a parameter used by some to measure abradability, being the ra-tio of seal volume removal compared to the volume of blade removal. Here again, only substantial changes are meaningful in significantly distinguishing seals. By example, the 0.05 mm blade wear in our six blade test is about equal to a 7~
VWR of 25~; ratios more than that are good; those less than that, e.g., around 100 are poor. For less meaningful single blade rub tests a good VWR
is greater than 10 while a poor VWR is less than 10.) The basic purpose of the seal is to circum-scribe a rotor of many blades and to prevent the passage of gases around the tip ends. Only under transients and atypical operation do the blade tips contact the seal. Thus, a prime requisite of seals is that they have adequate mechanical strength and resistance to particulate erosion, e.gO, sand particles carried in the air. Thus, there is a second test which is utilized to evaluate the per-lS formance of abradable seal materials. This iscomprised of an erosion test in which the abradable seal material is impacted by a sandblast, or air stream carrying abrasive particulates. The relative performance of materials is ranked in this test, based on the amount of material which is removed from the surface of an abradable material per unit volume of abrasive material impacted on the surface. Typical standard conditions comprise impacting the seal at a 15-20 angle with -250 Tyler Sieve Series mesh alumina grit carried in a 240 m/s velocity stream of 650C air.
Figures 1 and 2 respectively show representative data from the abradability test and the erosion test. In Figure 1, data from tests conducted as described above show that the combinations of density and oxide content to the left of the solid curved line are representative of good abradable materials while those to the right, at higher density and higher oxide content, are less good in that they 5 have glazed. Referring to Figure 2, it is seen that there is a tendency towards greatly increased erosion as the density is clecreased. Thus there are conflicting tendencies insofar as density is concerned. Low density permits more latitude in oxide content but produces less erosion resistance.
As a corollary, it is necessary to hold oxide contents beneath certain maximum levels if good abradability is to be obtained. (There has been no significant effect observed for oxide content on erosion resistance.) From the data in the Figures it is seen that the density is preferably less than about 38~ and more than about 27~ and the preferred density is in the range of 29-34%. In practice we most prefer 30-32~. Densities greater than 38% will give good erosion resistance, they also mean that the oxide content must be maintained at a very low level, at less than 10%. While this is feasible and can be done as evidenced by the data, for fine NiCr powder an undesired inert atmosphere processing would be needed to assure it. The oxidation which occurs is a function of the oxide content of the powder~, the process of spraying, and the process of removal. The minimum oxide content of 0.5-1.5 weight percent is a characteristic of commercial powder. There is in-47~(3;2 evitably a strong preference for densities less than 38~.
Also, at very high densiti~s of 60-70% or more, the materlal tends to assume the properties of solid metal and does not abrade properly. The lowest density in the invention is controlled by practical considerations and what is deemed to be the maximum acceptable erosion rate which is a function of the environment anticipated. An erosion rate of about 15 cm3/kg has been deemed to be the maxlmum acceptable for long life commercial engines based on test experience. Thus the density ought to be greater than about 26-27~ based on Figure 2. Also, as a practical matter, more consistent and re-producible seals are made when densities are in thehigher ranges. Because of the break in the curve around 29-30~, values above this level are preferred.
The oxide content is desirably in the 1-15~
range but it may be in the 1-30% range, because of its interrelation with the density, according to the area A in Figure 1. Even higher oxide contents are usable but the resultant close control of density necessitated at the lower end of the useful density range makes this very undesired. The nature of industrial processes, even those closely controlled as are characteristic of the aerospace industry, mean there will be variations from part to part. (It also should be understood that there will be the usual variation of plus or minus of a percent or two applied to the limits herein because of variations 47~
from specimen to specimen and in analytical measurements.) The oxide content for -250 Tyler Sieve Series mesh NiCr powder is lower on average than -325 mesh powder, when the preferred poly-methylmethacrylate is used, as evident from Figure 1. Thus, the coarser powders are preferred in making our invention.
It is surprising that lowering oxygen content improves abradability inasmuch as it generally is thought that oxygen embrittles materials. Our investigation thus far is insufficient to illuminate all the underlying phenomena of the invention.
Certainly, the erosion rate data are understandable insofar as they represent a general trend of in-creasing erosion rate with decreasing density.
We have discovered that there is anotherparameter by which we can characterize the density of those materials which are good for abradable seal use from those which are not good. The superficial hardness of a smooth and cleanly machined seal is measured in a Rockwell machine, on the Rockwell Z10 scale (i.e., using a 19 mm dia ball and a 10 kg load). The degree of indentation is measured in the normal mode of Rockwell testing an~ correlated on an arbitrary relative scale. For nichrome, the hardness of useable gas turbine seals will fall in the range 45-85 and will most preferably be 50-75. Seals made with polymethyl-methacrylate work best at 60-75 while polyester ~ '7~
made seals work best at 50-65. Measuring the hardness is a convenient way of characterizing the material without the tediousness of measuring its density. Of course the hardness is not only a measure of density or porosity but of the intrinsic material strength. The nichrome particles of our plasma sprayed seals have about 240 VHN micro-hardness. Other materials we have sprayed and their hardnesses are NiCrAl-250; NiCrAl~-300;
FeCrAlY-320; CoCrAlY-630. Thus the general principles of our invention as they are elucidated for the superficial hardness of nichrome will be applied to other materials in accord with general principles of materials behavior.
The oxide content which is referred to herein is that which is measured chemically by a digestion technique familiar in conventional chemical analysis. For 80Ni-20Cr nichrome the article being tested is immersed in a solution of methanol and 5 volume percent bromine at a temperature of about 75C
to dissolve all the metallic content. The insoluble residue is weighed and is characterized as oxide, there being no insignificant other insolubles be-lieved present in sprayed nichrome deposits. The density which is referred to herein is an apparent density. By this is meant that the following procedure is used: An abradable specimen is weighed and its volume is determined to produce the specific gravity of the specimen. This is divided by the 74()~
specific gravity of the solid metal alloy, e.g., 80Ni-20Cr, to produce the density number which is used herein. However, it is recognized that to the extent the specimen contains oxide, and to the extent the oxide has a different density from the metal alloy, the density percent is not a true number. In fact, al-though the nichrome oxides have not been fully charac-terized by us and although the oxides are intimately mixed with the metallic content of an abradable struc-ture, the oxides are not believed to have a densitywhich is substantially different from the metal. ~For example, the specific gravity of Nio is 7.45; Ni is 8.9;
Cr2O3 is 5.2; Cr is 7.2; and 80Ni-20Cr is 8.4. Simple calculation will show that oxidized nichrome has a density which is about 90~ of the metal. Thus, even though our density numbers are not true numbers, the errors are relatively small and will not make signifi-cantly in error the density limits by which we define our invention, it being evident from the presentation and scatter of the supporting data that those limits are nominal.
The manner of making our abradable seals is described in detail in Canadian Application No. 470,200 filed on even date herewith by Eaton and Novak, two the inventors herein. To summarize, in the preferred practice of making our seals, plasma arc spraying or other thermal spraying process is used to deposit a mixture of metal and polymer powders.
The polymeris then caused -to flee from the deposit, leaving behind a porous metal structure. Any polymer or other fugitive which achieves the objects of the invention, namely the desired density and oxide content, may be used. However, we have found that a polymer which depolymerizes is preferred. This is contrasted with the older techniques where a higher temperature polymer is used and where it must be removed by oxida-tion. When the polymer is of a type necessitatingheating to a high temperature, the deposit can oxidize unduly. Furthermore, when the polymer is removed by oxidation, we have found that temperatures can exceed those of the nominal furnace temperature to which the specimen is subjected. For instance, if a polyester resin such as polyparaoxybenzoyl (Ekonol TM of the Carborundum Company) is used, the metal-seal temperature will rise to the range of 625C when the furnace temper-ature is nominally 540C. Thus, polyester produces high oxide content in general and seals falling to the right of the line in Figure 1 will be erratic inso-far as glazing or not glazing. Preferably, we use poly-methylmethacrylate, such as Lucite TM grade 4FNC-99 powder (DuPont Company). This material is easily re-moved by heating the metal and polymer deposit to a temperature of about 315C for about 2hr, causing the polymer to convert to the volatile monomer.
In the preferred practice of making nichromeabradable materials, we spray 80-90 weight percent ~'7~
~16-nichrome with 20-10 polymethylmethacrylate. These mixtures, sprayed by plasma arc torch, produce deposits of 35-45 volume percent polymer, preferably 37-43 per-cent. The resultant metal deposits, after the polymer is caused to flee, have densities in the range of 30-50% of the base metal. As a specific example, 86 ni-chrome and 14 Lucite TM polymer are sprayed; (47:53 volume ratio). They do not necessarily deposit with the same efficiency. Weight loss measurement during re-moval of the fugitive polymer shows the deposit was 43volume percent polymer. Thus, the resultant structure is at least 32% void. Density measurement shows a value of 2.7 g/cm3, about 32% of the solid metal (8.4 g/cm3), meaning the apparent porosity is 68%.
This is greater than that provided by the polymer, and the variance is evidently due to the porosity of the metal-polymer deposit which is made by plasma spraying and the presence of oxide. We use plasma arc spraying with a Metco TM Model 7B gun in air with a 50-50 volumeof argon-helium mix-ture at an enthalpy of about 7 kwhr/m3 the powder being injected just downstream of the gun nozzle opening. Other aspects of application are with-in the known conventional practice~
Other thermal spraying techniques may be utilized to obtain the initialdeposit. Naturally, the process should not produce excess oxidation of the de-posit. But when we use the low temperature polymer, there is insignificant additional oxidation during 7~
the polymer removal process and substantial oxidation may be countenanced in the initial deposit. Conversely, high fugitive material removal temperatures can be used, so long as the initial oxidation is low or the material has inherent characteristics so that it does not obtain excessive oxidation. The data in Figure 1 show that it is difficult to obtain the desired result using the high temperature polyester resin which is re~erred to in the above mentioned patent to Longo et al, although such practice can be used if desired.
We obtain a more desirable seal structure when we use a meltable polymer, of which polymethyl-methacryla~e isthe preferred choice. In contrast, the polyester resin we refer to above does not appear to melt during spraying and gives a less open structure, as disclosed in the related application. Another measure of the advantage of the use of the meltable polymer is that the oxidation behavicr of the porous seal material is superior, compared to a virtually identical abradable seal material made with the non-melting polyester material. For instance, in 100 hr exposure to a temperature of 540C, the polyester-made -325 nichrome seal material wlll have an oxide co~tent of about ~0+% whereas the poly-methylmethacrylate-made material will have an oxide content of about 30+%. We do not exactly understand what phenomena underlies this, but we ~ believe it is related to the internal structure of the abradable material. As the photographs show '' `
in our related application, the polymethamethylacrylate material will assume a spherical shape during spraying whereas the non-melting polyester material has an irregular shaped surface. Since the frozen metal droplets presumably conform to the shape of the plastic with which they are in contact, the sur-face area of the abradable material made with the meltable polymer may be lower. Thus, our preferred seals have an internal pore shape which has spherical surface shapes. Since we cleslre to minimize oxide content, it follows that our preferred seals are made by a thermal spray method which provides them with internal pores having spherical surface sections.
Using a meltable polymer provides this result and makes easier the other parts of the manufacturing process.
Typically, the abradable material is sprayed onto a metal alloy substrate having a curved shape, such as IN 718nickel alloy or AISI 410 iron base alloy. The procedures followed to cause the abradable material to adhere to the substrate are those which are conventionally employed in plasma arc spraying, and special substrate treatments may be applied to achieve other objects than those to which the present invention is directed. While we have focused on the performance of seals for the com-pressor section of a gas turbine engine, where the temperatures of use are 650C or less, the principles of our invention will be useful in other parts of such machines, and in other machines.
Although this invention has been shown and de-scribed with respect to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention
Claims (23)
1. An abradable metallic seal material comprised of porous nickel alloy metal having an apparent density of 27-38 percent and an oxide content of 1-30 weight percent.
2. The material of claim 1 having a density of 28-32 percent.
3. The material of claim 2 having a density of 30-32 percent.
4. The invention of claim 1 characterized by the material shaped as a curved seal and characterized in that glazing does not occur when titanium alloy blade tips rotating with a 290 m/s tip speed engage the seal at a penetration rate of about 0.05 mm/s.
5. The material of claim 4 characterized in that the volume wear of a set of six engaging titanium alloy blade tips is less than 1/250 of the volume wear of the curved seal material when the blades have penetrated about 1 mm into the material.
6. The invention of claim 1 characterized by the nickel alloy metal being a nichrome alloy.
7. The invention of claim 6 characterized by the nickel alloy consisting essentially by weight percent of 80Ni and 20 Cr.
8. The invention of claim 1 characterized by the nickel alloy metal being a nichrome alloy having a density and oxide content falling within region A
of Figure 1.
of Figure 1.
9. The invention of claim 1 characterized by the pores of the nickel alloy metal having spherical shapes.
10. The invention of claim 1 characterized by an oxide content of 1-15 percent.
11. The material of claim 1 produced by plasma arc spraying the nickel metal alloy.
12. The material of claim 11 produced by spraying the nickel metal alloy onto a superalloy substrate so it adheres thereto.
13. A metallic material useful as an abradable seal comprised of a porous metal alloy having an oxide content of 1-30 weight percent and a Rockwell 10Z
superficial hardness number of 45-85.
superficial hardness number of 45-85.
14. The material of claim 13 having a hardness number of 50-75.
15. The invention of claim 13 characterized by the material shaped as a curved seal and characterized in that glazing does not occur when titanium alloy blade tips rotating with a 290 m/s tip speed engage the seal at a penetration rate of about 0.05 mm/s.
16. The material of claim 15 characterized in that the volume wear of a set of six engaging titanium alloy blade tips is less than 1/250 of the volume wear of the curved seal material when the blades have penetrated about 1 mm into the material.
17. The invention of claim 13 characterized by the metal alloy being a nichrome alloy.
18. The invention of claim 17 characterized by the metal alloy consisting essentially by weight per-cent of 80Ni and 20Cr.
19. The invention of claim 13 characterized by the metal alloy being a nichrome alloy having a density and oxide content falling within region A of Figure 1.
20. The invention of claim 13 characterized by the pores of the metal alloy having spherical shapes.
21. The invention of claim 13 characterized by an oxide content of 1-15 percent.
22. The method of obtaining a desired combina-tion of erosion resistance and abradability in a metal abradable seal which comprises controlling both the relative density of the seal in the range 27-38 percent and the oxide content in the range of 1-30 percent.
23. The method of obtaining a desired combination of erosion resistance and abradability in a metal abradable seal which comprises controlling both the relative Rockwell10Z superficial hardness of the seal in the range 27-38 percent and the oxide content in the range of 1-30 percent.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US56554283A | 1983-12-27 | 1983-12-27 | |
US565,542 | 1983-12-27 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1247402A true CA1247402A (en) | 1988-12-28 |
Family
ID=24259084
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000470201A Expired CA1247402A (en) | 1983-12-27 | 1984-12-14 | Porous metal abradable seal material |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPS60169538A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1247402A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3447470A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2152080B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5018573A (en) * | 1989-12-18 | 1991-05-28 | Carrier Corporation | Method for manufacturing a high efficiency heat transfer surface and the surface so manufactured |
FR2669938B1 (en) * | 1990-12-04 | 1993-03-19 | Robinetterie Mecanique Ste Gle | BLINDING DEVICE COMPRISING A DEFORMABLE METAL JOINT, AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF. |
DE19501659C1 (en) * | 1995-01-20 | 1996-05-15 | Daimler Benz Ag | Method for producing component made of metal foam |
SG88799A1 (en) * | 1999-12-17 | 2002-05-21 | United Technologies Corp | Abradable seal having improved properties |
GB2489693B (en) * | 2011-04-04 | 2014-10-01 | Rolls Royce Plc | Abradable liner |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3084064A (en) * | 1959-08-06 | 1963-04-02 | Union Carbide Corp | Abradable metal coatings and process therefor |
US3350178A (en) * | 1963-05-14 | 1967-10-31 | Wall Colmonoy Corp | Sealing device |
US3413136A (en) * | 1965-03-10 | 1968-11-26 | United Aircraft Corp | Abradable coating |
GB1226553A (en) * | 1967-06-27 | 1971-03-31 | ||
US3655447A (en) * | 1969-09-08 | 1972-04-11 | Mallory & Co Inc P R | Means and method for making porous bodies of integral structure |
GB1329256A (en) * | 1970-08-24 | 1973-09-05 | Mallory & Co Inc P R | Porous cadmium bodies |
JPS5127631B1 (en) * | 1971-01-11 | 1976-08-13 | ||
US3723165A (en) * | 1971-10-04 | 1973-03-27 | Metco Inc | Mixed metal and high-temperature plastic flame spray powder and method of flame spraying same |
FR2160358B3 (en) * | 1971-11-15 | 1975-08-29 | United Aircraft Corp | |
US3879831A (en) * | 1971-11-15 | 1975-04-29 | United Aircraft Corp | Nickle base high temperature abradable material |
US3964877A (en) * | 1975-08-22 | 1976-06-22 | General Electric Company | Porous high temperature seal abradable member |
JPS5410239A (en) * | 1977-06-25 | 1979-01-25 | Masayoshi Tagaya | Molten jetting of nickellchromium alloy |
US4269903A (en) * | 1979-09-06 | 1981-05-26 | General Motors Corporation | Abradable ceramic seal and method of making same |
JPS5644122A (en) * | 1979-09-14 | 1981-04-23 | Maruyasu Sangyo Kk | Magnetic recording medium |
US4336276A (en) * | 1980-03-30 | 1982-06-22 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Fully plasma-sprayed compliant backed ceramic turbine seal |
US4433845A (en) * | 1981-09-29 | 1984-02-28 | United Technologies Corporation | Insulated honeycomb seal |
US4566700A (en) * | 1982-08-09 | 1986-01-28 | United Technologies Corporation | Abrasive/abradable gas path seal system |
-
1984
- 1984-12-14 CA CA000470201A patent/CA1247402A/en not_active Expired
- 1984-12-19 GB GB08432052A patent/GB2152080B/en not_active Expired
- 1984-12-27 JP JP28194784A patent/JPS60169538A/en active Pending
- 1984-12-27 DE DE19843447470 patent/DE3447470A1/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB8432052D0 (en) | 1985-01-30 |
GB2152080B (en) | 1987-08-05 |
DE3447470A1 (en) | 1985-07-04 |
JPS60169538A (en) | 1985-09-03 |
GB2152080A (en) | 1985-07-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4664973A (en) | Porous metal abradable seal material | |
EP0187612B1 (en) | Abradable seal having particulate erosion resistance | |
JP3142003B2 (en) | Wearable seal for gas turbine engines formed by plasma spray | |
Borel et al. | The wear mechanisms occurring in abradable seals of gas turbines | |
CA1246111A (en) | Abrasive/abradable gas path seal system | |
US4275124A (en) | Carbon bearing MCrAlY coating | |
US5976695A (en) | Thermally sprayable powder materials having an alloyed metal phase and a solid lubricant ceramic phase and abradable seal assemblies manufactured therefrom | |
US20050129511A1 (en) | Turbine blade tip with optimized abrasive | |
Dorfman et al. | Gas turbines use ‘abradable’coatings for clearance-control seals | |
CA1230017A (en) | Porous metal structures made by thermal spraying fugitive material and metal | |
US4759957A (en) | Porous metal structures made by thermal spraying fugitive material and metal | |
US4275090A (en) | Process for carbon bearing MCrAlY coating | |
GB2033022A (en) | Turbomachinery blade | |
Bolelli et al. | Heat treatment effects on the tribological performance of HVOF sprayed Co-Mo-Cr-Si coatings | |
WO2000017490A2 (en) | Methods for repairing and reclassifying airfoil parts | |
US4937042A (en) | Method for making an abradable article | |
CA1247402A (en) | Porous metal abradable seal material | |
Bozzi et al. | Microabrasive wear behavior of different stellites obtained by laser cladding and casting processes | |
GB2063305A (en) | Carbon Bearing MCrAlY Coatings, Coated Articles and Method for these Coatings | |
US20040112174A1 (en) | Powder material for an abradable seal | |
Lakkannavar et al. | Assessment of the microstructure, adhesion and elevated temperature erosion resistance of plasma-sprayed NiCrAlY/cr3C2/h-bn composite coating | |
EP1001046A1 (en) | High temperature corrosion-resistant and abrasion-resistant coating member, and manufacturing method thereof | |
Dadouche et al. | Experimental evaluation of abradable seal performance at high temperature | |
Young et al. | Accelerated cavitation damage of steels and superalloys in sodium and mercury | |
WO1995021319A1 (en) | Honeycomb abradable seals |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |