CA1095897A - Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material - Google Patents
Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous materialInfo
- Publication number
- CA1095897A CA1095897A CA343,919A CA343919A CA1095897A CA 1095897 A CA1095897 A CA 1095897A CA 343919 A CA343919 A CA 343919A CA 1095897 A CA1095897 A CA 1095897A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- proteinaceous material
- proteinaceous
- fraction
- comminuted
- fractions
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous materials so as to effect separation of the comminuted pro-teinaceous materials into fractions differing in composition is disclosed. The process comprises admixing comminuted pro-teinaceous materials, or fractions derived therefrom, with an separating the proteinaceous material in the admixture into fractions differing in, in particular, protein content. The separation may be effected by for example subjecting the admix-ture, in the form of a slurry, to the influence of centrifugal force. In embodiments, a centrifuge and/or a hydrocyclone may be used. The proteinaceous materials are selected from wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat. Examples of suitable solvents are pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms. A variety of products are obtain-able, including protein-enriched and protein-deficient endo-sperm fractions. The products have a variety of uses in the food industry.
A process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous materials so as to effect separation of the comminuted pro-teinaceous materials into fractions differing in composition is disclosed. The process comprises admixing comminuted pro-teinaceous materials, or fractions derived therefrom, with an separating the proteinaceous material in the admixture into fractions differing in, in particular, protein content. The separation may be effected by for example subjecting the admix-ture, in the form of a slurry, to the influence of centrifugal force. In embodiments, a centrifuge and/or a hydrocyclone may be used. The proteinaceous materials are selected from wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat. Examples of suitable solvents are pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms. A variety of products are obtain-able, including protein-enriched and protein-deficient endo-sperm fractions. The products have a variety of uses in the food industry.
Description
~9~97 ; The present invention relates to a process for the treatment of proteinaceous material so as to effect separation of the comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions differing in composition. In particular, the present invention relates to the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material so as to separate fractions differing in protein content and/or to separate the comminuted proteinaceous material into an endosperm fraction, and "outer coat" fraction and an oil.
As used herein proteinaceous material is defined as wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat. Theouter coat of the cereal grains viz. wheat, rye, barley and tri-ticale is also known as bran, such bran may have endosperm attached thereto, whereas the outer coat of peas, beans and buck-wheat is also known as the seed coat. The endosperm of peas and beans is also known as the cotyledon. For the cereal grains and buckwheat the endosperm may include the germ. The expression "gum" used herein refers in particular to water-soluble gums, if present in the particular proteinaceous material.
The proteinaceous materials are a potential source of a wide variety of useful products. Examples of such products are flour, starch, protein-enriched and protein-depleted prod-ucts, bran, gum and oil, depending on the particular protein-aceous material. Traditional techniques used in the food pro-cessing industry if available, for the treatment of proteinaceous material so as to effect the separation of the proteinaceous material into fractions of differing composition are capable of improvement, for example with respect to energy requirements, potential pollution problems and the taste and/or colour of products. In other instances techniques may not be available for the conversion of the proteinaceous material into commer-cially viable products for example products of increased protein content.
Processes for the separation of a variety of products from comminuted oats are disclosed in Canadian Application No.
; 245,163 of A. Bell, J.R.B. Boocock and R.W. Oughton, filed February 4, 1976 and in Canadian Application No. 254,864 of R.W. Oughton, filed June 15, 1976. A process for isolating protein from a pulverized oil seed using liquid fluorocarbons is disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,869,438 of J.W. Finley et al, which issued March 4, 1975. The density separation of protein and car-bohydrates from wheat flour, soybeans, green peas and dried acid whey using a non-aqueous solvent system is described by J.W. Finley in Journal of Food Science, 41, 882-885 (1976).
Processes for the solvent-extractive milling of maize or corn, wheat, rye and the sorghum grains to remove the bran coat from whole kernels of such grains followed by comminution of the whole milled kernels and for the separation of so-called fibrous, proteinaceous, endosperm and/or starch fractions derived from such grains are disclosed by T.B. Wayne in Canadian Patents 864,538, which issued February 23, 1971, and 905,909 and 905,910, both of which issued July 25, 1972.
A need exists for a process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous materials, so as to effect the sep-aration of fractions of differing composition.
A process for the separation of fractions differing in composition from proteinaceous materials has now been found.
Accordingly the present invention provides a process for the separation of proteinaceous material into at least two fractions, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
: ~095~j?
..
(a) admixing comminuted proteinaceous material with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof; and ~ b) separating the admixture of comminuted protein-aceous material and solvent into at least two fractions, one . fraction having outer coat of the proteinaceous material as a substantial part of the solid component and a second fraction having endosperm as the major solid component, the amount of endosperm separated being at least 5~ of the comminuted protein-aceous material.
The present invention also provides a process for the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into frac~ions differing in composition, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, tri-ticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
(a) admixing comminuted proteinaceous material with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of comminuted : proteinaceous material and solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of cen-trifugal force and thereby separating the comminuted protein-! aceous material in said slurry into at least two ~ractions, said fractions differing in composition~
In addition the present invention provides a processfor the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions differing in composition, the prot~inac20us material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
l~gS897 ta) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, derived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of proteinaceous fraction and organic solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of cen-trifugal force and thereby separating said proteinaceous fraction into at least two fractions, said fractions differing in protein content.
Furthermore the present invention provides a process for the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions differing in composition, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
(a) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, d~rived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) subjecting said admixture to the influence of centrifugal force in a centrifuge and thereby forming a centri-fuge cake of said proteinaceous fraction, and (c) separating said cake in the substantial absence of said solvent into at least two layers, the protein content of at least one of said layers being different from the protein content of at least one of said other layers.
In the process of the present invention the protein-aceous materials that are cereal grains or buckwheat are prefer-ably dehulled, if necessary, prior to comminution. Techniques 109589'7 for dehulling cereal grains and buckwheat are known. In addition peas and beans should be separated from their pods.
The proteinaceous materials are comminuted in order to facili-tate extraction of any oil and to facilitate separation of a subsequently formed admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material and solvent into fractions differing in composition.
The particle size of the comminuted proteinaceous material will depend in particular on the technique to be used to separate the comminuted proteinaceous material in the admixture into fractions and may affect the segregation of protein in the material. For example, if a hydrocyclone is used to separate the proteinaceous material into fractions, the particle size of the comminuted proteinaceous material must be sufficiently small to allow the hydrocyclone to operate smoothly and efficiently and without plugging of the hydrocyclone. Conventional techniques, for example, pinmilling, hammer milling and other shearing techniques would appear to produce an acceptable comminuted proteinaceous material, the preferred techniques depending in particular on the actual separation techniques to be used.
In the process of the present invention the comminuted proteinaceous material is admixed with an organic solvent, especially an organic solvent for any oil that may be in the proteinaceous material. Such admixing facilitates extraction of oil, if present, in the proteinaceous material. The solvents used must be acceptable for use with foodstuffs, e.g. be non-toxic at the levels remaining in the products subsequently pro-duced, not cause the formation of toxic materials in the product and not have a significant deleterious effect on the nutritional value of the product, and must be capable of permitting separa-tion of the fractions. The amount and type of solvent remaining in products offered for sale must be acceptable to the appropriate l~g5~9~
health authorities, as will be understood by those skilled in - the art. Examples of solvents are pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof; as used herein the solvents hexane and heptane include those solvents referred to in the food industry as hexane and heptane. The preferred solvent is hexane. The present invention will generally be described hereinafter with reference to hexane as the solvent.
In the process of the present invention the comminuted proteinaceous material is admixed with the organic solvent e.g.
hexane. Such admixing is preferably carried out with agitation e.g. stirring and may be so as to form a slurry. If oil is present in the proteinaceous material the total period of time during which the comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane are admixed should be such that the desired degree of extraction of any oil from the comminuted proteinaceous material is achieved, the period of time being dependent in part on the actual technique of extraction. Generally a slurry of com-minuted proteinaceous material and hexane will be used.
The separation of the fractions of proteinaceous " material may be carried out by one or more embodiments of the process of the present invention. The preferred embodiment will depend in particular on the particular proteinaceous material and on the desired products.
In one embodiment the admixture of comminuted protein-aceous material and hexane is thoroughly mixed using for example a stirrer. The admixing may then be adjusted to effect separation of fractions of the proteinaceous material. For example if mixing is discontinued one fraction, which contains the outer coat i.e. bran if the proteinaceous material is a cereal grain or buckwheat, tends to settle significantly faster than a second fraction comprised of endosperm. Separation may i~95~g~
be effected by for example decantation. ~hen such a separation is used it is preferable to repeat the separation one or more times, optionally subjecting the outer coat fraction to further comminution to aid in the separation of any endosperm adhered to the outer coat. Alternatively a separation may be effected by sieving the admixture. The mesh size of the sieve will depend primarily on the degree of separation desired.
Preferably a sieve having a fine mesh e.g. 200 or finer, is used. The outer coat fraction will tend to be retained on the sieve and may be used as such or, especially if the outer coat is bran, subjected to further comminution and subsequent further separation into fractions. The endosperm fraction tends to pass through the sieve.
In another embodiment the stirring of the admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane is controlled so that the separation of the co~minuted proteinaceous material into fractions occurs _ situ i.e., a non-uniform distribution of the proteinaceous material occurs in the admixture.
Separation of one fraction from the admixture may be effected by adding additional solvent, preferably in a continuous manner, and removing, preferably simultaneously removing, a fraction of the comminution proteinaceous material in hexane. The fraction separated is preferably a fraction comprised of endosperm. It may be desirable to sieve the fraction being separated so as to remove any oversize particles therefrom.
The fraction not separated from the admixture and~or any oversize particles removed from the fractions being separated may be subjected to further comminution and subsequently further separation.
In a fuxther embodiment the admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane is admixed in the form of a 9~
slurry and then subjected to the influence of centrifugal force.
The means used to subject the slurry to centrifugal force is a centrifugal separator, preferably a centrifugal separator capable of being operated on a continuous or semi-continuous basis. Examples of centrifugal separators are continuous centrifuges, including semi-continuous centrifuges, ana hydro-cyclones.
In order to effect separation of a slurry of comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane into fractions in a hydro-cyclone, the slurry is fed to the hydrocyclone whereupon theslurry is subjected to centrifugal force and fractionation of the comminuted proteinaceous material in the slurry tends to occur. The operation of a hydrocyclone so as to obtain a desired fractionation of the comminuted proteinaceous material in the slurry will depend on a number of process variables, as will be understood by those skilled in the art. Examples of such variables are degree of comminution of the proteinaceous material, the amount of solid material in the slurry, the pressure drop across the hydrocyclone, the ratio of the flows through the so-called "underflow" and "overflow" outlets, the solvent and the like. The operation of the hydrocyclone is adjusted so that a desired fractionation is obtained.
While the present invention has been described herein-before with particular reference to the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions thereof, the present in-vention is not limited thereto. In a preferred embodiment, particularly with respect to the use of centrifugal force, the material which is subjected to separation is a proteinaceous fraction derived from proteinaceous material by means described herein or by other means known in the art. In particular the material subjected to the influence of centrifuga3 force is a proteinaceous fraction that has been obtained by classi-109~i89~
fying an admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material andhexane e.g. by sieving, decanting and the like as described hereinabove.
In general in the embodiments of the present invention, the fractions obtained will comprise at least 5%, and preferably at least 20%, of the comminuted proteinaceous material or of the proteinaceous fraction derived therefrom.
The use of the influence of centrifugal force on proteinaceous fractions derived from comminuted proteinaceous material, rather than on the comminuted material per se, may be advantageGus in that process problems associated with large particles e.g. the clogging of hydrocyclones, may be reduced or avoided. In particular endosperm fractions may be subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a continuous centrifuge or hydrocyclone. Proteinaceous fractions, especially endosperm fractions, may be subjected to single or multiple treatments under the influence of centrifugal forces to produce a variety of products, especially products of varying pxotein content.
In a particular embodiment of the process of the present invention, an endosperm fraction is subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a centrifuge. After separation of the solvent, e.g. hexane, the cake of solid material obtained may be selectively split into fractions of differing protein content. Techniques for the selective splitting of a centrifuge cake into fractions are known. For example a basket centrifuge may be used as the centrifuge and the fractions may be split out of the basket using a knife blade, as is known for basket centrifuges.
In the process of the present invention it is pre-ferred that water not be added to the admixtures of comminuted proteinaceous material, or fractions derived therefrom, and solvent. As exemplified hereinafter, the addition of water _g_ 1~9S897 may actually adversely affect the separation of the fractions~
Although water is preferably not added to the admixtures, it is not necessary to remove water naturally present in the proteinaceous material.
The proteinaceous material in the fractions separated according to the present invention may be separated from the solvent miscella by known techniques e.g. by the use of a cen-trifuge. Any oil in the solvent may also be recovered.
In a preferred embodiment of the process of the present invention the cereal grains, especially wheat, rye and triticale, have a hardness of less than 50. Hardness is defined as the time in seconds to pass 20 g of material through a 28 mesh TYLER screen in a WILEY mill. The measurement of hard-ness is discussed in greater detail in "Wheat Quality Evaluation Part I Accuracy and Precision of Prediction Tests", I.A. de la Roche and D.B. Fowler, Can. J. Plant Sci. 55 241-240, January 1975. The hardness numbers obtained for some cereal grains are given in Table I hereinafter.
The endosperm fraction, which may be referred to as flour, that is separated according to the process of the present invention is essentially free of any oil in the proteinaceous material. The products of the process of the present invention are believed to be useful in the food industry either as such or as a source of other products. For example flour or endo-sperm fractions are capable of being used as such or when enriched with protein as nutritional fortifiers in foods, in cereals, baby foods, cakes and the like; the particular end-use will depend to a significant extent on the particular protein-aceous material from which the fraction is derived. For example fractions derived from barley may be particularly useful in baby foods and those from buckwheat in oriental foods. Fractions * denotes trade mark IO~S897 derived from peas and beans are significantly de-coloured in the process of the present invention and may be particularly useful as nitritional fortifiers. Fractions derived from rye are characterized by the substantial absence of the taste associated with that cereal grain. The process of the present invention is capable of increasing the protein content of in particular low protein wheat thereby rendering such wheat !i useful in end-uses otherwise requiring a wheat of higher natural protein content. Starchy materials i.e. endosperm fractions of low protein content, especially from wheat, may be useful in pastries and in known uses for starches. The oils obtained are useful in a variety of end uses for example as vegetable oils.
The present invention is illustrated by the following examples. In the examples the protein content is Kjeldahl nitrogen content times 6.25.
EXAMPLE I
A proteinaceous material was comminuted, in sequence, on a knife mill and a pin mill to produce a finely ground ; 20 material. 150 g of the finely ground material was admixed in the form of a slurry with 300 g of hexane for 5 minutes. The slurry was then sieved with a 200 mesh TYLER screen. The material retained on the screen was re-admixed with 150 g of hexane for 5 minutes and re-sieved through the 200 mesh screen.
The oversized material thus obtained, i.e. that retained in the screen was dried in a vacuum oven and analyzed for protein.
The undersized material i.e. that passing through the screen in each instance, was combined and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1000 G. The hexane miscella was decanted off and a composite sample of the solid material was analyzed for protein.
The remaining solid material was re-admixed, as a slurry, with 75 g of hexane, poured into a 43 x 123 mm extraction 1~9589~
thimble supported ln a 2~0 ml centri~uge cup and centri~uged at 1000 G for 10 minutes. The hexane ~as decanted off. me thimble ~ras cut open, the depth of the centrifu~e cake obtained was measured and a thin layer was taken ~rom the top, middle and bottom sect~ons of the cake for protein analysis. All protein analysis were carried out on dried samples using a KJel-Foss Auto~atic 16210 protein analyzer.
The oil from the hexane miscella was reco~ered us~n~ a rotary evaporator.
Details o~ the proteinaceous materials used and the results obtained are given in Table I. In each case the colour of the centrifuge cake of undersized ~aterial ~,las white.
109~
.............
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q O a) I~ O ~ CJ tr) o~
0 O C~
,. ~ ~
~ _ u~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ --I C`J ~l ~q O
h ~ ~ ~) ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~l 1~ l~ ~o a~
Q CU~ O ~ O c0 F~ ~ ~D ~ r~ ~1 <~J C~l N ~f ) ~J C l N t 3 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o o ~ ~ o C~ ~ _ u~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ o ~ ~ u~
a),_.............
O O O r-l ~ N ~ ~ C~J O
ct h _~ ~ ~ O ~ C- O
~; ~ ~ a~ r.CJ __ ~Qr-l ~ 0 ~ Cq ~
N
h --`~1r-l ~ N) CJ ~ CO_ CU 0C3 h~ t--:~ ~ ~D 0 O~ ~O O ~ C5~ ~ 0 D ~2 _ ~1 ~1 ~ ~1 _i OC~ O~O ~0 ~1~1 0 0 ~ ~ ~D .. . . .. . . . . . .
o ~2 _ ~1 ~'1r-~~ CU~J N~1~Ir1~I C. C`J C`J
~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ o a~
:~
U~
o ~ *
~ ~ ¢ m ~ ' H )~ Z
Zl r<
P; ~ c~l ~r) ~ 1~ ~ ~ CC C'~ O C~ ~
~ 95897 .
TA9LE I (contlnued) * A ....... ~ield peas (pisum sativum) ..... horse beans (vicia faba) C ...... na~y beans (phaseoulus vulgzris) D ...... bucXwheat (not dehulled) E ...... buckwheat (dehulled) F ...... barley (not dehulled) : G ...... barley (dehulled) ~ ....... rye (puma), hardness = 44.1 I ...... trit~cale (rosner), hardness = 47.8 J ...... Fredrick so~t white winter wheat, hardness = 37.0 E ...... Opal utility spring wheat, hardness = 61.5 L ...... Neepat~ hard red spring wheat, hardness = 55.0 ; ~ ...... Glenlea spring ut~lity wheat, hardness = 66.1 - N ...... Cal-15 sprin~ utility wheat, hardness = 44.8 ' :
:
1~9~89~
EXA~E II
25 g o~ a co~minuted proteinaceous material were admixed with 75 g of hexane in a ~iARI~ * blender ~or 10 minutes.
The admlxture thus obtained was poured into a bea~-er, stirred thoroughly and the liquid fraction containing suspended solids was decanted off, the hea~J non-suspended solids (residue) being retained in the beaker. The liquid ~ractlon was centri-uged at 1000 G for 5 minutes using an extraction th~mble in the centri~uge cup. The thimble was then cut open and composite analytlcal-size samples were taken from the top and bottom of the centrifuge cake obtained. ~fter drying protein analyses were carried out on the top and bottom sæmples ænd on tne residue.
Deta~ls of the proteinaceous ~æterials and the results obtained are gl~en in Table II.
In all cases the hexane mlscella obtained was ~Jello~
in colour and the solid samples were off-white.
TABLE II
Protein Content Proteinaceous of Centrifuged Protein Conten4 Material Samples (~ ?~ es~due (~) Pxotein~
Type Content(~) TopBottom ~orse Beans 26.3 47.621.7 2~.6 Field Peas 27.1 42.026.7 26.3 (~hole) Field Peas 21.7 48.514.7 21.7 (split) EXAMPLE I~
A proteinaceous material ~s coarsel-J ground and then 30- finely ground usin~ a pinmill. A 15 g sa~ple of the co~inuted proteinaceous ma~exial thus obtained was de-oiled with he:ane in a So~hle~ extracvion apparatus for one QOUr. T.h.e de-o~led ~terial was a~iYed ~Jith 15 ~ of hexane ~n a TT.~I~,C- blender * denotes trade ~arli -15-lO9S89~
for 15 minutes, poured into a bea~er and thoroughly stirred.
The liquid fraction, containing suspended solids, ~as de-canted off, the heavy non-suspended solids (residue) being retained in the beaker. ~he liquid fraction W2S centrlfuged at 1000 G for approximately fi~e minutes usin~ an extraction thimble in the centrifuge cup. me thimble was then cut open and composite anal~tical-size samples were taken fro~ the top, middle and bottom sections of the centrifuge ca~e obtained.
- After drying protein analyses ~Jere carried out on the top, 1~ middle and botto~ samples and on the residue.
The abo~e procedure was repeated except that in separate experiments water in an aL~ount equal to a~proximately 30~ or 100~ of the weight of protein and fibre in the co~minuted proteinaceous ~aterial was added to the hexane in the ~rA.~IiiG
blender.
Details of the proteinaceous materials and the results obtained are given in ~able III.
lOg5897 o ~ u~ ~ t-'o ~
. - - . . - . -0 c>
~o~
h C~
P~ O
~ O ~ ~ C~J~i CO
_ O ~ . . - .. ..
C~
o~
O
~ ~ Q~ 0 0 v~ ~1 ~ O ~ ~J rl oc~ ao ~: 'a ~ O N<~ C0 ~ ~ICU CU
L~ C~ ~0 .~3 O ~ ~, * -* *
a~ o ~ ~ ~1 ~1 0 ~ O
~ V & r~
H ¦
o~ 0oo 0oo 0ooc~oo ¢ ~o ~o ~o ~o 3~ ~
~ ~ ~ .
,. s~
o c) a~ '`
t, ~ C~
s~ ~o 01 ~ C) o 4, ~, a) a) ~ ~ o G~ X
o P s~
*
~g~
EXUIPLE IV
The procedure of ~xample I was repeated on na~y be~ns except th~t ~ethanol ~taS used as solvent. The resul~s ~;Tere as follows:
Proteinaceous ~aterial Protein Content (~) 24.8 Crude Oil* Wt. (g) 4.8 OYersized Sam~le Wt. (g) 102 Protein Content ($) 24.8 Composite Sample Protein Content (~) 21.6 Cake Depth (~m) 43 Undersized Sample Protein Content (~) Top 51.4 Middle 12.7 Bottom 18~9 * met,hl~nol-eoluble ~raction E~IE V
e pro~edure of Example I was repeated except tha~
the 150 g of finely ground proteinaceous mater~ai were ædm~;:e8 ln the ~orm o~ a slurry with 300 g o~ hexane in a I~Jh~ G*
blender. me adm~xing in the ~ARING ble~der was carried out ~or 5 m~nutes and the slurr~ ~hus obtalned was subse~u~n~y treated as in Example I.
Deta~s of the proteinaceous mater~als used and the results obtained were as follows:
Protein~ceous ~terial Iype** D J N
Protein Content (%) 1~.4 9.0 16.1 0~1 ~Jt. (g) 3.7 1.9 2.1 O~ersized Sample ~t- (g) 93 ~9 70 Protein Content (~) 10.6 12.4 16.5 Composite Sample D J N
Protein Content (%) 16.9 8.9 15.3 Cake Depth (mm) 46 60 55 Undersized Sample Protein Content (%) Top 39.2 37.9 47.4 Middle 16.4 6.5 10.5 Bottom 7.4 7.4 11.7 ** See Example I
The analyses of the "top" samples of this Example and of Example I indicate the effect of the high speed agitation in the WARING blender on protein content of fractions.
EXAMPLE VI
A sample of proteinaceous material was admixed at ambient temperature with 400 ml of hexane in a vertical glass cylinder measuring 40 cm in height and 6 cm in diameter. The admixture was vigorously agitated for 30 minutes. The agitation was then decreased, thereby causing non-uniform distribution of the proteinaceous material in the hexane, and a major portion , 20 of the hexane solution was siphoned off and sieved with a 325 mesh TYLER screen. Any oversized material retained on the screen was returned to the cylinder.
The above procedure was repeated two times, 400 ml of hexane being added to the cylinder each time.
The oversized material remaining in the cylinder after completion of the above was dried and analysed for protein content. The solutions of undersized material i.e. that passing through the screen on each occasion, were combined and cen-trifuged. The hexane miscella was decanted off and the under-sized material thus obtained was dried and analysed for proteincontent. The hexane was evaporated from the hexane miscella so as to obtain the oil.
1~95~9~
All protein ~nalyses were made using a macro-scale K~eldahl method.
Details of the proteinaceous ~aterials and the results obtained were as follo-.7s:
Run 1 2 3 4 Proteinaceous Material Ty~e* A B C D E
Weight (g) 90.0 94-3 88.1 93.~ 91.8 Protein Content(~ .4 11.1 11.3 12.6 12.9 O~ersized ~aterial**
Weight (g) 71.6 52.2 55.8 64.o 73-3 Protein Content(O15.1 12.7 13.8 13.2 11.3 Undersized ~ateriæl T,~eight (g) 6.2 28.1 27.1 20.1 12.2 Protein Content(~)20.5 10.3 8.6 14.1 13.2 Oil Weight (g) 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.6 1.5 * A ....... Selkirk hard red spring ~rheat B ...... Fredrick soft winter wheat C ...... Tetra Petkus winter ~e D ...... Vanier barley E ...... a hull-less ba.ley ** in all runs the oversized material was Duff in colour ~nd the undersized materi21 Yas ~rhi~e. ~ne o-~ersi~ed ~æterial comprised bran and endosperm.
EXA~IPI2 r~rII
Approximately 3500 g of pin~illed Fredr~c~ winter wheat were admixed, in the form of a sl~rry, with 15.9 litres o~ hexane for 10 minutes at a~bient tempera~ure. The resultan~
adm~xture was sieved using a S',~ECO* Vi~ro Energ~ Separator e~uip~ed with a 325 mesh TYL2R screen. The oversized 2~ter~al (bran) i.e. that retained on the screen, wæs dried ~n a rotary ~acuum drier ænd analyzed ~or protein content.
The undersized materiæl (~10UL~) i.e. that pa~s'ng through the screen, ~as agitated so as to form 3 Sl u~ry and * denotes trade mark 10~97 pumped through a 10 mm DORR-OLIVER DOXIE TYPE A* hydrocyclone at an inlet pressure of 2.8 kg/cm2. The overflow fraction was centrifuged to separate the solid material from the hexane miscella and the solid material obtained is referred to below as "First Overflow Solids". The underflow fraction from the hydrocyclone was passed through the hydrocyclone again at an inlet pressure of 2.8 kg/cm2. The overflow and underflow fractions thus obtained were separately centrifuged to separate the solid material from hexane miscella and the solid materials obtained are referred to below as "Second Overflow Solids" and "Underflow Solids" respectively. All the solids were dried in a rotary vacuum drier and analysed for protein content.
The oil was recovered from the combined hexane miscella All protein anaylses were carried out on a Kjel-Foss Automatic 16210 protein analyzer.
The results obtained were as follows:
Weight Protein Content Colour (g) (%) Starting Material 3500 9.5 First Overflow Solids13.2 43.2 white Second Overflow Solids** 382.3 13.~ white Underflow Solids**955.5 5.1 white Oversized Material1840 12.1 buff Oil 40.7 yellow-green ** The residual oil in the products, as determined by a hot Soxhlet extraction using hexane as solvent, was 0.1~ for the Second Overflow Solids and 0.05~ in the Underflow Solids.
The application is a division of copending Application Serial No. 267 784, filed December 14, 1976.
* denotes trade mark
As used herein proteinaceous material is defined as wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat. Theouter coat of the cereal grains viz. wheat, rye, barley and tri-ticale is also known as bran, such bran may have endosperm attached thereto, whereas the outer coat of peas, beans and buck-wheat is also known as the seed coat. The endosperm of peas and beans is also known as the cotyledon. For the cereal grains and buckwheat the endosperm may include the germ. The expression "gum" used herein refers in particular to water-soluble gums, if present in the particular proteinaceous material.
The proteinaceous materials are a potential source of a wide variety of useful products. Examples of such products are flour, starch, protein-enriched and protein-depleted prod-ucts, bran, gum and oil, depending on the particular protein-aceous material. Traditional techniques used in the food pro-cessing industry if available, for the treatment of proteinaceous material so as to effect the separation of the proteinaceous material into fractions of differing composition are capable of improvement, for example with respect to energy requirements, potential pollution problems and the taste and/or colour of products. In other instances techniques may not be available for the conversion of the proteinaceous material into commer-cially viable products for example products of increased protein content.
Processes for the separation of a variety of products from comminuted oats are disclosed in Canadian Application No.
; 245,163 of A. Bell, J.R.B. Boocock and R.W. Oughton, filed February 4, 1976 and in Canadian Application No. 254,864 of R.W. Oughton, filed June 15, 1976. A process for isolating protein from a pulverized oil seed using liquid fluorocarbons is disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,869,438 of J.W. Finley et al, which issued March 4, 1975. The density separation of protein and car-bohydrates from wheat flour, soybeans, green peas and dried acid whey using a non-aqueous solvent system is described by J.W. Finley in Journal of Food Science, 41, 882-885 (1976).
Processes for the solvent-extractive milling of maize or corn, wheat, rye and the sorghum grains to remove the bran coat from whole kernels of such grains followed by comminution of the whole milled kernels and for the separation of so-called fibrous, proteinaceous, endosperm and/or starch fractions derived from such grains are disclosed by T.B. Wayne in Canadian Patents 864,538, which issued February 23, 1971, and 905,909 and 905,910, both of which issued July 25, 1972.
A need exists for a process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous materials, so as to effect the sep-aration of fractions of differing composition.
A process for the separation of fractions differing in composition from proteinaceous materials has now been found.
Accordingly the present invention provides a process for the separation of proteinaceous material into at least two fractions, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
: ~095~j?
..
(a) admixing comminuted proteinaceous material with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof; and ~ b) separating the admixture of comminuted protein-aceous material and solvent into at least two fractions, one . fraction having outer coat of the proteinaceous material as a substantial part of the solid component and a second fraction having endosperm as the major solid component, the amount of endosperm separated being at least 5~ of the comminuted protein-aceous material.
The present invention also provides a process for the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into frac~ions differing in composition, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, tri-ticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
(a) admixing comminuted proteinaceous material with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of comminuted : proteinaceous material and solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of cen-trifugal force and thereby separating the comminuted protein-! aceous material in said slurry into at least two ~ractions, said fractions differing in composition~
In addition the present invention provides a processfor the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions differing in composition, the prot~inac20us material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
l~gS897 ta) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, derived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of proteinaceous fraction and organic solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of cen-trifugal force and thereby separating said proteinaceous fraction into at least two fractions, said fractions differing in protein content.
Furthermore the present invention provides a process for the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions differing in composition, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
(a) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, d~rived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) subjecting said admixture to the influence of centrifugal force in a centrifuge and thereby forming a centri-fuge cake of said proteinaceous fraction, and (c) separating said cake in the substantial absence of said solvent into at least two layers, the protein content of at least one of said layers being different from the protein content of at least one of said other layers.
In the process of the present invention the protein-aceous materials that are cereal grains or buckwheat are prefer-ably dehulled, if necessary, prior to comminution. Techniques 109589'7 for dehulling cereal grains and buckwheat are known. In addition peas and beans should be separated from their pods.
The proteinaceous materials are comminuted in order to facili-tate extraction of any oil and to facilitate separation of a subsequently formed admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material and solvent into fractions differing in composition.
The particle size of the comminuted proteinaceous material will depend in particular on the technique to be used to separate the comminuted proteinaceous material in the admixture into fractions and may affect the segregation of protein in the material. For example, if a hydrocyclone is used to separate the proteinaceous material into fractions, the particle size of the comminuted proteinaceous material must be sufficiently small to allow the hydrocyclone to operate smoothly and efficiently and without plugging of the hydrocyclone. Conventional techniques, for example, pinmilling, hammer milling and other shearing techniques would appear to produce an acceptable comminuted proteinaceous material, the preferred techniques depending in particular on the actual separation techniques to be used.
In the process of the present invention the comminuted proteinaceous material is admixed with an organic solvent, especially an organic solvent for any oil that may be in the proteinaceous material. Such admixing facilitates extraction of oil, if present, in the proteinaceous material. The solvents used must be acceptable for use with foodstuffs, e.g. be non-toxic at the levels remaining in the products subsequently pro-duced, not cause the formation of toxic materials in the product and not have a significant deleterious effect on the nutritional value of the product, and must be capable of permitting separa-tion of the fractions. The amount and type of solvent remaining in products offered for sale must be acceptable to the appropriate l~g5~9~
health authorities, as will be understood by those skilled in - the art. Examples of solvents are pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof; as used herein the solvents hexane and heptane include those solvents referred to in the food industry as hexane and heptane. The preferred solvent is hexane. The present invention will generally be described hereinafter with reference to hexane as the solvent.
In the process of the present invention the comminuted proteinaceous material is admixed with the organic solvent e.g.
hexane. Such admixing is preferably carried out with agitation e.g. stirring and may be so as to form a slurry. If oil is present in the proteinaceous material the total period of time during which the comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane are admixed should be such that the desired degree of extraction of any oil from the comminuted proteinaceous material is achieved, the period of time being dependent in part on the actual technique of extraction. Generally a slurry of com-minuted proteinaceous material and hexane will be used.
The separation of the fractions of proteinaceous " material may be carried out by one or more embodiments of the process of the present invention. The preferred embodiment will depend in particular on the particular proteinaceous material and on the desired products.
In one embodiment the admixture of comminuted protein-aceous material and hexane is thoroughly mixed using for example a stirrer. The admixing may then be adjusted to effect separation of fractions of the proteinaceous material. For example if mixing is discontinued one fraction, which contains the outer coat i.e. bran if the proteinaceous material is a cereal grain or buckwheat, tends to settle significantly faster than a second fraction comprised of endosperm. Separation may i~95~g~
be effected by for example decantation. ~hen such a separation is used it is preferable to repeat the separation one or more times, optionally subjecting the outer coat fraction to further comminution to aid in the separation of any endosperm adhered to the outer coat. Alternatively a separation may be effected by sieving the admixture. The mesh size of the sieve will depend primarily on the degree of separation desired.
Preferably a sieve having a fine mesh e.g. 200 or finer, is used. The outer coat fraction will tend to be retained on the sieve and may be used as such or, especially if the outer coat is bran, subjected to further comminution and subsequent further separation into fractions. The endosperm fraction tends to pass through the sieve.
In another embodiment the stirring of the admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane is controlled so that the separation of the co~minuted proteinaceous material into fractions occurs _ situ i.e., a non-uniform distribution of the proteinaceous material occurs in the admixture.
Separation of one fraction from the admixture may be effected by adding additional solvent, preferably in a continuous manner, and removing, preferably simultaneously removing, a fraction of the comminution proteinaceous material in hexane. The fraction separated is preferably a fraction comprised of endosperm. It may be desirable to sieve the fraction being separated so as to remove any oversize particles therefrom.
The fraction not separated from the admixture and~or any oversize particles removed from the fractions being separated may be subjected to further comminution and subsequently further separation.
In a fuxther embodiment the admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane is admixed in the form of a 9~
slurry and then subjected to the influence of centrifugal force.
The means used to subject the slurry to centrifugal force is a centrifugal separator, preferably a centrifugal separator capable of being operated on a continuous or semi-continuous basis. Examples of centrifugal separators are continuous centrifuges, including semi-continuous centrifuges, ana hydro-cyclones.
In order to effect separation of a slurry of comminuted proteinaceous material and hexane into fractions in a hydro-cyclone, the slurry is fed to the hydrocyclone whereupon theslurry is subjected to centrifugal force and fractionation of the comminuted proteinaceous material in the slurry tends to occur. The operation of a hydrocyclone so as to obtain a desired fractionation of the comminuted proteinaceous material in the slurry will depend on a number of process variables, as will be understood by those skilled in the art. Examples of such variables are degree of comminution of the proteinaceous material, the amount of solid material in the slurry, the pressure drop across the hydrocyclone, the ratio of the flows through the so-called "underflow" and "overflow" outlets, the solvent and the like. The operation of the hydrocyclone is adjusted so that a desired fractionation is obtained.
While the present invention has been described herein-before with particular reference to the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions thereof, the present in-vention is not limited thereto. In a preferred embodiment, particularly with respect to the use of centrifugal force, the material which is subjected to separation is a proteinaceous fraction derived from proteinaceous material by means described herein or by other means known in the art. In particular the material subjected to the influence of centrifuga3 force is a proteinaceous fraction that has been obtained by classi-109~i89~
fying an admixture of comminuted proteinaceous material andhexane e.g. by sieving, decanting and the like as described hereinabove.
In general in the embodiments of the present invention, the fractions obtained will comprise at least 5%, and preferably at least 20%, of the comminuted proteinaceous material or of the proteinaceous fraction derived therefrom.
The use of the influence of centrifugal force on proteinaceous fractions derived from comminuted proteinaceous material, rather than on the comminuted material per se, may be advantageGus in that process problems associated with large particles e.g. the clogging of hydrocyclones, may be reduced or avoided. In particular endosperm fractions may be subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a continuous centrifuge or hydrocyclone. Proteinaceous fractions, especially endosperm fractions, may be subjected to single or multiple treatments under the influence of centrifugal forces to produce a variety of products, especially products of varying pxotein content.
In a particular embodiment of the process of the present invention, an endosperm fraction is subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a centrifuge. After separation of the solvent, e.g. hexane, the cake of solid material obtained may be selectively split into fractions of differing protein content. Techniques for the selective splitting of a centrifuge cake into fractions are known. For example a basket centrifuge may be used as the centrifuge and the fractions may be split out of the basket using a knife blade, as is known for basket centrifuges.
In the process of the present invention it is pre-ferred that water not be added to the admixtures of comminuted proteinaceous material, or fractions derived therefrom, and solvent. As exemplified hereinafter, the addition of water _g_ 1~9S897 may actually adversely affect the separation of the fractions~
Although water is preferably not added to the admixtures, it is not necessary to remove water naturally present in the proteinaceous material.
The proteinaceous material in the fractions separated according to the present invention may be separated from the solvent miscella by known techniques e.g. by the use of a cen-trifuge. Any oil in the solvent may also be recovered.
In a preferred embodiment of the process of the present invention the cereal grains, especially wheat, rye and triticale, have a hardness of less than 50. Hardness is defined as the time in seconds to pass 20 g of material through a 28 mesh TYLER screen in a WILEY mill. The measurement of hard-ness is discussed in greater detail in "Wheat Quality Evaluation Part I Accuracy and Precision of Prediction Tests", I.A. de la Roche and D.B. Fowler, Can. J. Plant Sci. 55 241-240, January 1975. The hardness numbers obtained for some cereal grains are given in Table I hereinafter.
The endosperm fraction, which may be referred to as flour, that is separated according to the process of the present invention is essentially free of any oil in the proteinaceous material. The products of the process of the present invention are believed to be useful in the food industry either as such or as a source of other products. For example flour or endo-sperm fractions are capable of being used as such or when enriched with protein as nutritional fortifiers in foods, in cereals, baby foods, cakes and the like; the particular end-use will depend to a significant extent on the particular protein-aceous material from which the fraction is derived. For example fractions derived from barley may be particularly useful in baby foods and those from buckwheat in oriental foods. Fractions * denotes trade mark IO~S897 derived from peas and beans are significantly de-coloured in the process of the present invention and may be particularly useful as nitritional fortifiers. Fractions derived from rye are characterized by the substantial absence of the taste associated with that cereal grain. The process of the present invention is capable of increasing the protein content of in particular low protein wheat thereby rendering such wheat !i useful in end-uses otherwise requiring a wheat of higher natural protein content. Starchy materials i.e. endosperm fractions of low protein content, especially from wheat, may be useful in pastries and in known uses for starches. The oils obtained are useful in a variety of end uses for example as vegetable oils.
The present invention is illustrated by the following examples. In the examples the protein content is Kjeldahl nitrogen content times 6.25.
EXAMPLE I
A proteinaceous material was comminuted, in sequence, on a knife mill and a pin mill to produce a finely ground ; 20 material. 150 g of the finely ground material was admixed in the form of a slurry with 300 g of hexane for 5 minutes. The slurry was then sieved with a 200 mesh TYLER screen. The material retained on the screen was re-admixed with 150 g of hexane for 5 minutes and re-sieved through the 200 mesh screen.
The oversized material thus obtained, i.e. that retained in the screen was dried in a vacuum oven and analyzed for protein.
The undersized material i.e. that passing through the screen in each instance, was combined and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1000 G. The hexane miscella was decanted off and a composite sample of the solid material was analyzed for protein.
The remaining solid material was re-admixed, as a slurry, with 75 g of hexane, poured into a 43 x 123 mm extraction 1~9589~
thimble supported ln a 2~0 ml centri~uge cup and centri~uged at 1000 G for 10 minutes. The hexane ~as decanted off. me thimble ~ras cut open, the depth of the centrifu~e cake obtained was measured and a thin layer was taken ~rom the top, middle and bottom sect~ons of the cake for protein analysis. All protein analysis were carried out on dried samples using a KJel-Foss Auto~atic 16210 protein analyzer.
The oil from the hexane miscella was reco~ered us~n~ a rotary evaporator.
Details o~ the proteinaceous materials used and the results obtained are given in Table I. In each case the colour of the centrifuge cake of undersized ~aterial ~,las white.
109~
.............
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q O a) I~ O ~ CJ tr) o~
0 O C~
,. ~ ~
~ _ u~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ --I C`J ~l ~q O
h ~ ~ ~) ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~l 1~ l~ ~o a~
Q CU~ O ~ O c0 F~ ~ ~D ~ r~ ~1 <~J C~l N ~f ) ~J C l N t 3 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o o ~ ~ o C~ ~ _ u~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ o ~ ~ u~
a),_.............
O O O r-l ~ N ~ ~ C~J O
ct h _~ ~ ~ O ~ C- O
~; ~ ~ a~ r.CJ __ ~Qr-l ~ 0 ~ Cq ~
N
h --`~1r-l ~ N) CJ ~ CO_ CU 0C3 h~ t--:~ ~ ~D 0 O~ ~O O ~ C5~ ~ 0 D ~2 _ ~1 ~1 ~ ~1 _i OC~ O~O ~0 ~1~1 0 0 ~ ~ ~D .. . . .. . . . . . .
o ~2 _ ~1 ~'1r-~~ CU~J N~1~Ir1~I C. C`J C`J
~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ o a~
:~
U~
o ~ *
~ ~ ¢ m ~ ' H )~ Z
Zl r<
P; ~ c~l ~r) ~ 1~ ~ ~ CC C'~ O C~ ~
~ 95897 .
TA9LE I (contlnued) * A ....... ~ield peas (pisum sativum) ..... horse beans (vicia faba) C ...... na~y beans (phaseoulus vulgzris) D ...... bucXwheat (not dehulled) E ...... buckwheat (dehulled) F ...... barley (not dehulled) : G ...... barley (dehulled) ~ ....... rye (puma), hardness = 44.1 I ...... trit~cale (rosner), hardness = 47.8 J ...... Fredrick so~t white winter wheat, hardness = 37.0 E ...... Opal utility spring wheat, hardness = 61.5 L ...... Neepat~ hard red spring wheat, hardness = 55.0 ; ~ ...... Glenlea spring ut~lity wheat, hardness = 66.1 - N ...... Cal-15 sprin~ utility wheat, hardness = 44.8 ' :
:
1~9~89~
EXA~E II
25 g o~ a co~minuted proteinaceous material were admixed with 75 g of hexane in a ~iARI~ * blender ~or 10 minutes.
The admlxture thus obtained was poured into a bea~-er, stirred thoroughly and the liquid fraction containing suspended solids was decanted off, the hea~J non-suspended solids (residue) being retained in the beaker. The liquid ~ractlon was centri-uged at 1000 G for 5 minutes using an extraction th~mble in the centri~uge cup. The thimble was then cut open and composite analytlcal-size samples were taken from the top and bottom of the centrifuge cake obtained. ~fter drying protein analyses were carried out on the top and bottom sæmples ænd on tne residue.
Deta~ls of the proteinaceous ~æterials and the results obtained are gl~en in Table II.
In all cases the hexane mlscella obtained was ~Jello~
in colour and the solid samples were off-white.
TABLE II
Protein Content Proteinaceous of Centrifuged Protein Conten4 Material Samples (~ ?~ es~due (~) Pxotein~
Type Content(~) TopBottom ~orse Beans 26.3 47.621.7 2~.6 Field Peas 27.1 42.026.7 26.3 (~hole) Field Peas 21.7 48.514.7 21.7 (split) EXAMPLE I~
A proteinaceous material ~s coarsel-J ground and then 30- finely ground usin~ a pinmill. A 15 g sa~ple of the co~inuted proteinaceous ma~exial thus obtained was de-oiled with he:ane in a So~hle~ extracvion apparatus for one QOUr. T.h.e de-o~led ~terial was a~iYed ~Jith 15 ~ of hexane ~n a TT.~I~,C- blender * denotes trade ~arli -15-lO9S89~
for 15 minutes, poured into a bea~er and thoroughly stirred.
The liquid fraction, containing suspended solids, ~as de-canted off, the heavy non-suspended solids (residue) being retained in the beaker. ~he liquid fraction W2S centrlfuged at 1000 G for approximately fi~e minutes usin~ an extraction thimble in the centrifuge cup. me thimble was then cut open and composite anal~tical-size samples were taken fro~ the top, middle and bottom sections of the centrifuge ca~e obtained.
- After drying protein analyses ~Jere carried out on the top, 1~ middle and botto~ samples and on the residue.
The abo~e procedure was repeated except that in separate experiments water in an aL~ount equal to a~proximately 30~ or 100~ of the weight of protein and fibre in the co~minuted proteinaceous ~aterial was added to the hexane in the ~rA.~IiiG
blender.
Details of the proteinaceous materials and the results obtained are given in ~able III.
lOg5897 o ~ u~ ~ t-'o ~
. - - . . - . -0 c>
~o~
h C~
P~ O
~ O ~ ~ C~J~i CO
_ O ~ . . - .. ..
C~
o~
O
~ ~ Q~ 0 0 v~ ~1 ~ O ~ ~J rl oc~ ao ~: 'a ~ O N<~ C0 ~ ~ICU CU
L~ C~ ~0 .~3 O ~ ~, * -* *
a~ o ~ ~ ~1 ~1 0 ~ O
~ V & r~
H ¦
o~ 0oo 0oo 0ooc~oo ¢ ~o ~o ~o ~o 3~ ~
~ ~ ~ .
,. s~
o c) a~ '`
t, ~ C~
s~ ~o 01 ~ C) o 4, ~, a) a) ~ ~ o G~ X
o P s~
*
~g~
EXUIPLE IV
The procedure of ~xample I was repeated on na~y be~ns except th~t ~ethanol ~taS used as solvent. The resul~s ~;Tere as follows:
Proteinaceous ~aterial Protein Content (~) 24.8 Crude Oil* Wt. (g) 4.8 OYersized Sam~le Wt. (g) 102 Protein Content ($) 24.8 Composite Sample Protein Content (~) 21.6 Cake Depth (~m) 43 Undersized Sample Protein Content (~) Top 51.4 Middle 12.7 Bottom 18~9 * met,hl~nol-eoluble ~raction E~IE V
e pro~edure of Example I was repeated except tha~
the 150 g of finely ground proteinaceous mater~ai were ædm~;:e8 ln the ~orm o~ a slurry with 300 g o~ hexane in a I~Jh~ G*
blender. me adm~xing in the ~ARING ble~der was carried out ~or 5 m~nutes and the slurr~ ~hus obtalned was subse~u~n~y treated as in Example I.
Deta~s of the proteinaceous mater~als used and the results obtained were as follows:
Protein~ceous ~terial Iype** D J N
Protein Content (%) 1~.4 9.0 16.1 0~1 ~Jt. (g) 3.7 1.9 2.1 O~ersized Sample ~t- (g) 93 ~9 70 Protein Content (~) 10.6 12.4 16.5 Composite Sample D J N
Protein Content (%) 16.9 8.9 15.3 Cake Depth (mm) 46 60 55 Undersized Sample Protein Content (%) Top 39.2 37.9 47.4 Middle 16.4 6.5 10.5 Bottom 7.4 7.4 11.7 ** See Example I
The analyses of the "top" samples of this Example and of Example I indicate the effect of the high speed agitation in the WARING blender on protein content of fractions.
EXAMPLE VI
A sample of proteinaceous material was admixed at ambient temperature with 400 ml of hexane in a vertical glass cylinder measuring 40 cm in height and 6 cm in diameter. The admixture was vigorously agitated for 30 minutes. The agitation was then decreased, thereby causing non-uniform distribution of the proteinaceous material in the hexane, and a major portion , 20 of the hexane solution was siphoned off and sieved with a 325 mesh TYLER screen. Any oversized material retained on the screen was returned to the cylinder.
The above procedure was repeated two times, 400 ml of hexane being added to the cylinder each time.
The oversized material remaining in the cylinder after completion of the above was dried and analysed for protein content. The solutions of undersized material i.e. that passing through the screen on each occasion, were combined and cen-trifuged. The hexane miscella was decanted off and the under-sized material thus obtained was dried and analysed for proteincontent. The hexane was evaporated from the hexane miscella so as to obtain the oil.
1~95~9~
All protein ~nalyses were made using a macro-scale K~eldahl method.
Details of the proteinaceous ~aterials and the results obtained were as follo-.7s:
Run 1 2 3 4 Proteinaceous Material Ty~e* A B C D E
Weight (g) 90.0 94-3 88.1 93.~ 91.8 Protein Content(~ .4 11.1 11.3 12.6 12.9 O~ersized ~aterial**
Weight (g) 71.6 52.2 55.8 64.o 73-3 Protein Content(O15.1 12.7 13.8 13.2 11.3 Undersized ~ateriæl T,~eight (g) 6.2 28.1 27.1 20.1 12.2 Protein Content(~)20.5 10.3 8.6 14.1 13.2 Oil Weight (g) 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.6 1.5 * A ....... Selkirk hard red spring ~rheat B ...... Fredrick soft winter wheat C ...... Tetra Petkus winter ~e D ...... Vanier barley E ...... a hull-less ba.ley ** in all runs the oversized material was Duff in colour ~nd the undersized materi21 Yas ~rhi~e. ~ne o-~ersi~ed ~æterial comprised bran and endosperm.
EXA~IPI2 r~rII
Approximately 3500 g of pin~illed Fredr~c~ winter wheat were admixed, in the form of a sl~rry, with 15.9 litres o~ hexane for 10 minutes at a~bient tempera~ure. The resultan~
adm~xture was sieved using a S',~ECO* Vi~ro Energ~ Separator e~uip~ed with a 325 mesh TYL2R screen. The oversized 2~ter~al (bran) i.e. that retained on the screen, wæs dried ~n a rotary ~acuum drier ænd analyzed ~or protein content.
The undersized materiæl (~10UL~) i.e. that pa~s'ng through the screen, ~as agitated so as to form 3 Sl u~ry and * denotes trade mark 10~97 pumped through a 10 mm DORR-OLIVER DOXIE TYPE A* hydrocyclone at an inlet pressure of 2.8 kg/cm2. The overflow fraction was centrifuged to separate the solid material from the hexane miscella and the solid material obtained is referred to below as "First Overflow Solids". The underflow fraction from the hydrocyclone was passed through the hydrocyclone again at an inlet pressure of 2.8 kg/cm2. The overflow and underflow fractions thus obtained were separately centrifuged to separate the solid material from hexane miscella and the solid materials obtained are referred to below as "Second Overflow Solids" and "Underflow Solids" respectively. All the solids were dried in a rotary vacuum drier and analysed for protein content.
The oil was recovered from the combined hexane miscella All protein anaylses were carried out on a Kjel-Foss Automatic 16210 protein analyzer.
The results obtained were as follows:
Weight Protein Content Colour (g) (%) Starting Material 3500 9.5 First Overflow Solids13.2 43.2 white Second Overflow Solids** 382.3 13.~ white Underflow Solids**955.5 5.1 white Oversized Material1840 12.1 buff Oil 40.7 yellow-green ** The residual oil in the products, as determined by a hot Soxhlet extraction using hexane as solvent, was 0.1~ for the Second Overflow Solids and 0.05~ in the Underflow Solids.
The application is a division of copending Application Serial No. 267 784, filed December 14, 1976.
* denotes trade mark
Claims (50)
1. A process for the separation of comminuted pro-teinaceous material into fractions differing in composition, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group con-sisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
(a) admixing comminuted proteinaceous material with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alco-hols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of comminuted proteinaceouc material and solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of cen-trifugal force and thereby separating the comminuted proteina-ceous material in said slurry into at least two fractions, said fractions differing in composition.
(a) admixing comminuted proteinaceous material with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alco-hols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of comminuted proteinaceouc material and solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of cen-trifugal force and thereby separating the comminuted proteina-ceous material in said slurry into at least two fractions, said fractions differing in composition.
2. The process of Claim 1 in which each of said fractions contains at least 5% of the comminuted proteinaceous material.
3. The process of Claim 2 in which essentially all of any oil in the proteinaceous material is extracted by the solvent in steps (a) and (b).
4. The process of Claim 3 in which the proteina-ceous material is essentially free of any hulls thereof.
5. The process of Claim 4 in which one fraction is endosperms said endosperm being essentially free of bran.
6. The process of Claim 5 in which the solvent is selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane and cyclohexane, and mixtures thereof.
7. The process of Claim 6 in which the slurry is subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a hydro-cyclone.
8. The process of Claim 6 in which the slurry is subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a continuous centrifuge.
9. The process of any one of Claim 2, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which each of said fractions contains at least 20% of the comminuted proteinaceous material.
10. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is wheat.
11. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is rye.
12. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is barley.
13. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is triticale.
14. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is peas.
15. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is beans.
16. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is buckwheat.
17. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye and triticale, and said proteinaceous material has a hardness of less than 50.
18. The process of any one of Claim 1, Claim 7 and Claim 8 in which the proteinaceous material is wheat of a hardness of less than 50.
19. A process for the separation of comminuted proteinaceous material into fractions differing in composition, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
(a) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, derived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pen-tane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of proteina-ceous material and solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of centrifugal force and thereby separating said proteinaceous fraction into at least two fractions differing in protein content.
(a) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, derived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said solvent being selected from the group consisting of pen-tane, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) forming a slurry of said admixture of proteina-ceous material and solvent; and (c) subjecting the slurry to the influence of centrifugal force and thereby separating said proteinaceous fraction into at least two fractions differing in protein content.
20. The process of Claim 19 in which the proteina-ceous fraction is comprised of endosperm.
21. The process of Claim 19 in which the proteina-ceous fraction consists of endosperm.
22. The process of Claim 21 in which a slurry of one of said fractions with said organic solvent is subsequently subjected to the influence of centrifugal force to separate said one fractlon tnto at least two additional fractions, said additional fractions differing in protein content.
23. The process of Claim 21 in which the solvent is selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane and cyclohexane, and mixtures thereof, and each of said fractions contain at least 5% of the proteinaceous fraction.
24. The process of Claim 22 in which the solvent is selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane and cyclohexane, and mixtures thereof.
25. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the slurry is subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a hydrocyclone.
26. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the slurry is subjected to the influence of centrifugal force in a continuous centrifuge.
27. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is wheat.
28. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is rye.
29. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is barley.
30. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is triticale.
31. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is peas.
32. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is beans.
33. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is buckwheat.
34. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye and triticale, and said proteinaceous material has a hardness of less than 50.
35. The process of any one of Claim 21, Claim 22 and Claim 24 in which the proteinaceous material is wheat of a hardness of less than 50.
36. A process for the separation of comminuted pro-teinaceous material into fraction differing in composition, the proteinaceous material being selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye, barley, triticale, peas, beans and buckwheat, said process comprising:
(a) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, derived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said organic solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentene, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) subjecting said admixture to the influence of centrifugal force in a centrifuge and thereby forming a centrifuge cake of said proteinaceous fraction; and (c) separating said cake in the substantial absence of said solvent into at least two layers, the protein content of at least one of said layers being different from the protein content of at least one of said other layers.
(a) admixing a proteinaceous fraction, derived from said comminuted proteinaceous material, with an organic solvent, said organic solvent being selected from the group consisting of pentene, hexane, heptane, cyclohexane and alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof;
(b) subjecting said admixture to the influence of centrifugal force in a centrifuge and thereby forming a centrifuge cake of said proteinaceous fraction; and (c) separating said cake in the substantial absence of said solvent into at least two layers, the protein content of at least one of said layers being different from the protein content of at least one of said other layers.
37. The process of Claim 36 in which the proteina-ceous fraction is comprised of endosperm.
38. The process of Claim 37 in which the endosperm is essentially free of outer coat.
39. The process of Claim 38 in which the solvent is selected from the group consisting of pentane, hexane, heptane, and cyclohexane, and mixtures thereof.
40. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which each fraction contains at least 5% of the proteinaceous fraction.
41. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which each fraction contains at least 20% of the proteinaceous fraction.
42. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is wheat.
43. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is rye.
44. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is barley.
45. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is triticale.
46. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is peas.
47. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is beans.
48. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is buckwheat.
49. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is selected from the group consisting of wheat, rye and triticale, and said proteinaceous material has a hardness of less than 50.
50. The process of any one of Claim 36, Claim 38 and Claim 39 in which the proteinaceous material is wheat of a hardness of less than 50.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA343,919A CA1095897A (en) | 1975-12-16 | 1980-01-17 | Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB51498/75 | 1975-12-16 | ||
GB51498/75A GB1552012A (en) | 1975-12-16 | 1975-12-16 | Process for the treatment of comminuted oats |
CA267,783A CA1080700A (en) | 1975-12-16 | 1976-12-14 | Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material |
CA343,919A CA1095897A (en) | 1975-12-16 | 1980-01-17 | Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1095897A true CA1095897A (en) | 1981-02-17 |
Family
ID=27164820
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA343,919A Expired CA1095897A (en) | 1975-12-16 | 1980-01-17 | Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA1095897A (en) |
-
1980
- 1980-01-17 CA CA343,919A patent/CA1095897A/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4154728A (en) | Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material | |
US4211695A (en) | Process for the treatment of comminuted oats | |
EP0013093B2 (en) | Water soluble vegetable protein aggregates, a process for the production thereof and food recipes containing them | |
US5312636A (en) | Process for fractioning crop into industrial raw material | |
US3615655A (en) | Method for preparing high protein cereal grain product | |
US4220287A (en) | Process for the treatment of oats | |
USRE32725E (en) | Water-soluble vegetable protein aggregates | |
US3723407A (en) | Method of preparing vegetable protein concentrates | |
Sosulski et al. | Fractionation of rapeseed meal into hour and hull components | |
US4211801A (en) | Process for the treatment of comminuted oats | |
US4108847A (en) | Method for preparing bland protein enriched products from grain gluten | |
CA1155110A (en) | Recovery of a proteinaceous oat fraction from a dispersion thereof in hydrocarbon solvent | |
US4039696A (en) | Soy lipid-protein concentrate | |
US3615657A (en) | Process for producing cottonseed protein concentrate | |
US4301719A (en) | Separating citrus peel into albedo and flavedo components | |
US4376133A (en) | Agglomeration of proteinaceous solids | |
US4208260A (en) | Treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material under the influence of an electric field | |
US4208259A (en) | Treatment of comminuted oats under the influence of an electric field | |
CA1330077C (en) | Process for fractioning crop into industrial raw material | |
US4151310A (en) | Soybean protein extract | |
CA1095897A (en) | Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material | |
GB1569981A (en) | Process for the treatment of comminuted proteinaceous material | |
CA1089849A (en) | Dehulling of rapeseed or mustard defatted meals | |
CA1087611A (en) | Process for the treatment of comminuted oats | |
Johnston et al. | Process for protein‐starch separation in wheat flour: experiments with a continuous decanter‐type centrifuge |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |