AU769873B2 - Stabilized turf for athletic field - Google Patents
Stabilized turf for athletic field Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU769873B2 AU769873B2 AU97308/01A AU9730801A AU769873B2 AU 769873 B2 AU769873 B2 AU 769873B2 AU 97308/01 A AU97308/01 A AU 97308/01A AU 9730801 A AU9730801 A AU 9730801A AU 769873 B2 AU769873 B2 AU 769873B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- backing
- layer
- fibers
- turf
- growth media
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01C—CONSTRUCTION OF, OR SURFACES FOR, ROADS, SPORTS GROUNDS, OR THE LIKE; MACHINES OR AUXILIARY TOOLS FOR CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR
- E01C13/00—Pavings or foundations specially adapted for playgrounds or sports grounds; Drainage, irrigation or heating of sports grounds
- E01C13/08—Surfaces simulating grass ; Grass-grown sports grounds
- E01C2013/086—Combination of synthetic and natural grass
Landscapes
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
Description
S&F Ref: 489272D1
AUSTRALIA
PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT
ORIGINAL
a Name and Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: Technology Licensing Corp.
5055 Wooster Road Cincinnati Ohio 45226 United States of America Joseph E. Motz, Mark A. Heinlein, Steve Linville Spruson Ferguson St Martins Tower,Level 31 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 (CCN 3710000177) Stabilized Turf for Athletic Field a The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- ,c c 5845c STABILIZED TURF FOR ATHLETIC FIELD FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a natural turf for athletic fields, and more particularly to a natural turf which is stabilized via fibers and a growth media such as sand.
5 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Since Robey U.S. Patent No. 4,023,506, it has been known that a flat layer of artificial fibers disposed below the ground can be used to enhance the stability of a natural turf 0000* located thereabove, by providing enhanced holding power for the root system of the natural grass.
Thereafter, U.S. Patent Nos. 4,044,179 and 4,337,283, issued to Haas, Jr., disclosed a surface 10 comprising an artificial composite having a horizontal backing and upright fibers, with sand filled in to provide lateral support for the fibers. The primary purpose of the inventions disclosed in these Haas patents was to provide a stable, maintenance free surface for a variety of uses, such as a landing area for golf ball driving ranges, or even golf courses.
European patent application EP 0 403 008 Al discloses a combination of natural grass and artificial fibers which extend upwardly from a horizontally disposed artificial backing to stabilize the natural grass. The roots of the natural grass extend downwardly through the backing, the grass extends upwardly above the fibers, and the artificial fibers are supported -2laterally by a fill layer, such as sand. U.S. Patt Nos. 5,489,317 and 5,586,408, issued to Berg-vin. disclose and claim a structure similar to these prior disclosures, but with the specific feature of the sand fill layer terminating at the same vertical level as the tops of the artificial fibers. This results in an above-ground playing surface which is entirely natural grass, because the fibers do not extend above the sand. As indicated in the Bergevin patents and in the prosecution histories thereof; a relatively thick layer of sand is necessary to fill the fibers to their upper ends, to uniformly hold down the horizontal backing, and also to initiate natural plant growth at a vertical level which is very near to the top ends of the artificial fibers.
Such a substantial sand fill layer atop the horizontal layer and surrounding the 10 artificial fibers forms a tight, uniformly compacted playing surface of natural grass. However, because of the height of the sand, to the tops of the fibers, the ground surface tends to become slick and hard once the natural turf begins to wear. The reason for this problem requires a discussion of the importance of turf management practices. It is a commonly understood turf management practice to apply periodic layers of "topdressing," usually sand, on a natural turf athletic surface, such as a ball field or golf course putting green or tee. The periodically applied layers of topdressing provide stability and some degree of firmness to the ground, but more impotantly they create and help maintain an environment conducive to healthy plant growth and rapid recovery from use.
Most well kept athletic surfaces for sport purposes are maintained in such a way that the grass clippings are collected, rather than simply allowed to disperse on the surface.
However, with natural grass plans, particularly under the intense maintenance regimes common for professional and collegiate facilities, even if clippings are collected there is still considerable production and decomposition of plant and root matter which can quickly build up and form a thatch layer. This decomposing plant matter will eventually form a thick organic layer if not managed. Agronomically, this organic layer has severe negative effects on drainage and -3movement of nutrients and pesticides into the root system. From an athletic playability standpoint, footing, surface speed, wear tolerance, ball roll and bounce, can be adversely affected. The organic layer can result in a condition known in the industry as "black layer," whereby the organic matter becomes anaerobic due to poor drainage and a loss of capacity for gas exchange. This condition can severely limit root growth and overall plant health.
It is well recognized that the periodic application of"topdressing," a layer of growth media, usually sand or sand based, with a thickness in the range of about 0.125-0.25 inches), helps to prevent the forming of an organic layer of this type. Topdressing also ameliorates these harmful conditions if such a layer should begin to develop. Topdressing is 10 typically applied 1-3 times per year. The number of applications depends to some extent on the availability of the field. The surface cannot be used immediately after topdressing because topdressing creates a loose layer on the playing surface, which adversely affects footing in the short term. With respect to the furf disclosed in the Bergevin patents, the application of the first layer oftopdressing would immediately result in completely burying the upright artificial fibers, so that the fibers would be diminished in their ability to perform the intended purpose of providing lateral stability for the turf. Thus, the owner of the field must choose between the lesser of two evils, completely burying the stabilizing fibers with the first application of topdressing or risking the possibility that an adverse "black layer" may eventually form at the ground surface. It is applicant's understanding that the written turf management guidelines for the Berevin turfproduct specifically emphasize that topdressing should not be applied to the turf because it would negate the beneficial aspects of the product. Stated another way, this product forces the owner of an athletic field to disregard the well known turf maintenance practice of applying topdressing. Thus, the wear of the turf eventually causes slickness, but one of the normal turf management steps for ameliorating this condition is discouraged.
-4- Another commonly recommended and practiced turf management strategy involves aerating a natural turf. As with applying topdressing, aerating is periodically performed to decrease the build-up of organic matter on the surface, decrease compaction, keep the surface well drained and to maintain a vigorous natural turf canopy. Typically, aerating is done with the same frequency or in conjunction with topdressing, due to scheduling, although additional aerations without topdressing may provide further agronomic benefits. But again, the frequency depends on field availability and scheduling. Aerating is usually done by inserting and removing into the turf hollow tines which are 0.375-0.75 inches in width. In order to penetrate an entire thatch layer and the uppermost root zone area of the natural turf it is typically necessary to aerate to a depth of three inches or greater.
Unfortunately, with the various prior art natural grass/artificial fiber turfs described above, it can become difficult to aerate down to the desired depth because of the structural density of the horizontal backing which holds the artificial fibers. This is particularly true if aerating is done with hollow aerating tines, which are preferred over solid pointed tines.
Also, if aerated too many times, the backing would no longer be able to achieve its stated purpose of holding the fibers. With the product constructed in accordance with the Bergevin patents, the management guidelines recognize this problem, and the turf management manual states that aeration should not be implemented. Thus, while this structure initially provides increased stability for the natural turf surface, the horizontal backing hinders the performance of one of the most basic turf management practices, namely aerating with hollow tines. The athletic field owner is again forced to disregard an advantageous turf management principle.
The horizontal backing can also act as a flow barrier between the layers of growth media located above and below. This can adversely affect drainage or subirrigation of the field. This concern arises particularly with respect to subsurface drainage, irrigation and heating systems, and controls therefor, as disclosed in applicant's PCT Application Nos.
PCT/US95/1 1891 and PCTIUS96/02207. In essence, the horizontal backing and/or the organic suface layer can create a "perched water table" above the underlying growth media, a condition which is readily understood by those skilled in the art. By creating a perched water table at the top of the root zone, downward movement of ixater and nutrients and upward movement of water by capillary action ("wicking') during sub-irrigation and the natural phenomenon of evapotranspiration are significantly inhibited. In essence, the subsurface materials above the backing are isolated from those below it.
Thus, the relatively recent developments in combining artificial fibers with natural grass plants have produced only limnited advances in achieving a stabilized natural turf athletic field, particularly but not exclusively for natural turfs which are constructed of soils high mn sand content. The relatively slow market acceptance of these stabilized turfs to date indicates that there is room for improvement, primarily from an agronomic standpoint.
A stabilized nafural turf may be initially growvn on a sod finn, on top of a plastic layer, until it is ready to be cut and then transported to the ultimate site where it is to be used.
Since the transporter will typically pay transportation costs which are directly proportional to the weight of the material being transported, it is desirable to minimize the overall weight of the components which make up the stabilized athletic turf gronm at the sod farm. Large layers of sand atop the horizontal backing are counter-productive in this regard.
6 It is thus desirable to improve upon the stability of a natural turf, particularly for athletic fields, while at the same time allowing the natural turf to be compatible with readily accepted turf management practices such as aeration and topdressing.
It is also desirable to achieve a stable natural turf with minimal organic residue at the surface thereof and improved drainage capability.
It is also desirable to achieve a stable natural turf which is more compatible with state of the art subsurface control systems for drainage and irrigation.
It is also desirable to achieve a stabilized natural turf wherein the stabilizing fibers do not become buried with the first application of topdressing.
It is also desirable to achieve a stabilized natural turf which is more efficiently harvested at a sod farm without waste, and then economically and conveniently transported from the sod farm to another site, such as a stadium.
It is the object of the present invention to substantially overcome or at least ameliorate one or more of the prior art disadvantages or achieve at least one of the above desires.
Summary of the Invention In one aspect, the present invention provides a natural turf surface suitable for athletics comprising: a compacted subsoil; a first layer of growth media located above the subsoil; a mat supported on the first layer, the mat including a substantially biodegradable root permeable backing oriented horizontally and a plurality of substantially vertical artificial fibers held by the backing; second layer of growth media located on the mat; natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending downwardly through the second layer and the mat and into the first layer and the crowns extending above the horizontal backing; and the backing including a decomposition affecting agent so that at least some of the backing biodegrades within a predetermined time period, thereby to facilitate hollow tine aeration of the natural turf down to the depth of the first layer and to promote dispersion of the fibers within a stabilization zone having a greater vertical dimension than the second layer.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a stabilizer for stabilizing the subsurface of a natural turf surface, made according to the process comprising: [R:\LIBLL] 12255.doc:vjp creating a fabric backing of substantially biodegradable material, the backing being of sufficient porosity to permit downward growth therethrough of the roots of natural grass plants; treating at least one surface of the backing with a decomposition affecting agent S to affect decomposition of the backing within a predetermined time period; and securing artificial fibers to the backing, at a predetermined density, thereby to stabilize the natural grass plants.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of preparing and maintaining a stabilized natural turf, comprising: preparing a subsurface; placing a first layer of growth media on the prepared subsurface; placing a mat on the first layer, the mat having a substantially biodegradable fabric backing and a plurality of upwardly extending artificial fibers held thereto; laying a second layer of growth media on the mat, so that the top of the second layer resides below the upper ends of the artificial fibers; growing natural grass plants in the second layer, with roots thereof extending downwardly through the mat and into the first layer resulting in a stabilized turf; and aerating the stabilized turf with hollow tines down to the first layer after at least some of the backing has begun to biodegrade, thereby to facilitate dispersion of the fibers within the first and second layers of growth media.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of making a field suitable for athletics comprising: growing a surface of natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending downwardly into an upper layer of growth media and a lower layer of growth media, the upper and lower layers of growth media being separated by a mat having a substantially biodegradable backing oriented horizontally and a plurality of substantially vertical artificial fibers held by the backing; and aerating the surface down to the lower layer of growth media with hollow tines after the backing has begun to biodegrade, whereby the aerating vertically disperses and reorients the artificial fibers throughout the upper and lower layers of growth media, thereby to increase the stabilized zone for the roots of the natural grass plants.
In another aspect, the present invention provides method of making a field suitable for athletics comprising: [R:\L1BLLj12255.doc:vjp growing a surface of natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending downwardly into an upper layer of growth media and a lower layer of growth media, the upper and lower layers of growth media being separated by a mat having a water permeable and root permeable backing oriented horizontally and a plurality of substantially vertical artificial fibers held by the backing, the backing having a construction, density and composition selected to optimize water and root permeability therethrough; and aerating the surface down to the lower layer of growth media with hollow tines after a predetermined time period, thereby to reduce the buildup of organic residue above 1o the backing and to increase the root permeability of the backing.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a stabilized natural turf comprising: a bottom support surface; a lower layer of growth media located above the support surface; 15 a mat supported on the lower layer, the mat having a backing oriented horizontally and fibers extending generally upwardly therefrom, the backing including a first degradable primary and a second non-degradable primary which is initially more permeable than the first primary, the first primary being selected to have a composition, weight and density to sufficiently degrade so as to eventually become more permeable, over time, than the second primary; an upper layer of growth media located above the mat; and natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending S.downwardly through the upper layer and through the backing and into the lower layer, and the crowns located above the backing, the tops of the grass plants and the fibers extending above the upper layer.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a stabilizer for a stabilized natural turf, made according to the process comprising: creating a backing, the backing including a first woven primary and a second primary, the two primaries together being sufficiently root permeable to permit passage therethrough by roots of natural grass plants; and tufting a plurality of fibers to the two primaries, the fibers adapted to extend generally upwardly when the two primaries are oriented horizontally on a foundation.
The preferred embodiment utilizes in conjunction with natural grass plants, an improved stabilizing mat having non-biodegradable fibers secured to a substantially biodegradable backing. When the backing is disposed horizontally, the fibers are [R:\LIBLL] 12255.doc:vjp generally upright. A stabilizing upper layer of growth media, such as sand, supports the bottom portions of the generally upright fibers. The upper portions of the fibers extend above the upper layer of growth media.
Thus, the backing is only temporary, because it eventually goes away. The Ssubstantial biodegrading, decomposing, of the backing promotes drainage and subirrigation, by eliminating any barrier effects. As the backing substantially decomposes and the grass plants mature, aeration will cause the upright fibers to vertically disperse somewhat, thereby increasing the vertical dimension of the stabilized ground beyond the vertical dimension of the individual fibers. This occurs as a result of the interaction of the 1o aerating tines and the fibers. Because the fibers initially extend well above the upper layer, the stabilized turf of this invention can be topdressed without burying the fibers on the first application of topdressing, or even within the first few applications. The biodegrading of the backing makes it easy for the hollow aeration tines to move vertically therethrough to allow aeration of the natural turf down to optimal depths, to promote healthy maturation of the natural grass plants. Because the stabilized turf of the preferred embodiment of this •o *.oo* o* *o* [R:\LIBLL] 12255.doc:vjp invention can be aerated and topdressed when needed, the turf has excellent drainage capabilities with minimal opportunity of "black layer" formation.
Additionally, the invention contemplates treating the biodegradable backing so as to accelerate or decelerate the biodegrading process, as desired. Normally, an untreated homogenous woven backing of jute, for instance, will decompose completely within about one year or so, but it will lose its structural integrity much sooner than that, within several months. These time periods to some extent depend on the climate, temperature and wetness.
The substantial decomposition time period should be determined and correlated to the time it takes for stable root growth for the natural grass plants. Stated another way, once a suitable grow in period is determined for the natural grass plants for the athletic field in question, the backing can be made and/or treated to substantially biodegrade within about that same time o period.
Once the backkg has substantially decomposed, there is no longer any hindrance to normal drainage or even vacuum-assisted drainage, a type of drainage which is common with 15 some of the more sophisticated state of the art control systems for athletic fields around the
C
I: world. Also, the non-biodegradable fibers are able to reorient from generally upright positions and even to migrate vertically in response to aeration of the turf. As a result, the fibers become distributed over a stabilizing band which is greater in vertical dimension than the fibers themselves. Despite decomposition of the backing, the non-biodegradable fibers continue to provide stabilized support for the natural grass plants, because their performance of that function does not require the continued presence of the backing. Moreover, this vertical redistribution of the fibers minimizes the possibility that subsequent applications oftopdressing will eventually bury all of the fibers.
According to a first preferred embodiment of the invention, the mat comprises non-biodegradable artificial fibers made of polypropylene secured in upright orientation to a -9comprises natural grass plants and upright fibers, with the tops of the fibers generally located below the tops of the-natural grass plants. The location of the fibers above the top of the upper layer of growth media helps to maintain good footing and minimum slickness of the playing surface as the natural grass plants decompose.
The use of an upper fill layer which resides below the upper ends of the artificial fibers also allows the application of topdressing to the natural turf surface. Because the topdressing layers usually have a vertical dimension of about 0.125 to 0.25 inches, and because some settling may occur after the application of topdressing, none of the first few applications of topdressing will bury the fibers. By allowing this turf management practice of periodically 10 applying topdressing, this invention helps to eliminate or at least to significantly reduce the S* undesired build up of homogenous organic residue at the surface. Thus, the playing surface of the stabilized turf does not become slick or slippery as the natural turf begins to wear. Also, because the fibers still extend above the ground surface even after several applications of **topdressing, they continue to provide some degree of added surface friction to the ground. This helps to assure continued sure footing on the playing surface, and athletic play on the field can be resumed relatively soon after applying topdressing.
Advantageously, the substantially biodegradable backing absorbs and holds moisture and soluble nutrients, unlike the artificial non-biodegradable backing materials of prior art stabilized turfs. This moisture and nutrient holding capability is particularly beneficial in the turf establishment period. If desired, a fertilizing agent can also be incorporated into the backing, to further assist natural plant growth. Also, once moisture-laden, the backing becomes heavier and less likely to slide laterally relative to the underlying layers. Applicant believes this feature to be particularly true for a woven jute backing. This also helps to minimize the possibility of differential shift of different sections of a turf athletic field.
-8homogenous horizontal backing woven out of jute. The preferred manner of securement is by tufting. The backing is "finished" on both sides by applying a secondary coating thereto in liquid form, such as an acrylic latex suspended in a dispersing agent such as water. The first finishing step occurs on the upper surface of the backing before securement of the non-biodegradable fibers, while the second finishing step, the backside application, occurs after fiber securement. These secondary backings, as known in the carpet backing industry, help to secure the fibers to this backing. In affect, they serve as temporary stabilizing agents. They are temporary because they decompose several weeks after the mat has been underground. To some extent, and depending on the material, the stabilizing agent may affect decomposition.
Additionally, a decomposition agent, specifically an anti-microbial such as zinc omadine, may also be included in the liquid dispersion in an effective amount to slow the rate of degradation of the woven portion of the backing.
If grown in at a field site, the mat, the backing with the fibers secured generally upright thereto, is laid upon a lower fill layer of growth media, such as sand, then an upper fill layer is applied thereto. Preferably, the upper fill layer of growth media extends only about halfway to two thirds of the way up the fibers. Thereafter, the upper fill layer is seeded, sprigged or in some cases, covered with a sod which has been pressure washed, or any other form of turfing. After the grow in period, natural grass plants extend upwardly above the upward layer, alongside and eventually above the tops of the upright fibers, with roots that extend downwardly through the backing and into the lower layer of growth media. If the stabilized turf is grown at a remote site such as a sod farm, then there is no lower layer of sand used at the sod farm. The mat is placed directly on a sheet of plastic. Everything above remains the same.
Because the total material transported to the installation site includes only a relatively thin upper layer of growth media, this invention minimizes the vertical dimension and the overall weight of the turf to be transported. Since the upright fibers extend above the sand, the playing surface 10 The substantially biodegradable backing also provides important advantages in both turf stability and economics for turf grown at a sod farm. Specifically, the backings of adjacent sections can be secured, sewn or stapled, together to provide a seamless turf. This securement together of adjacent backing sections is particularly advantageous prior to transport from a turf farm to a site, particularly for end to end seams of rolled turf sections residing in a single row. As the turf is rolled up along the row, it may tend to separate or tear along the transverse seam. Securement of the transverse end to end seams eliminates this problem.
As an alternative to the above-described embodiment, the backing can be supplemented with a synthetic material, such as polypropylene, and woven therein to provid e reinforcement and added strength, and to slow the overall decomposition rate, so that substantial degradation is delayed. This reinforcement may comprise the longitudinal or the transverse fibers of the backing.
As yet another embodiment of the invention, the backing may be reinforced with a layer of relatively lightweight mesh, having open cells or a relatively high degree of openness, see* thereby to form a non-biodegradable layer of the backing. It is believed that a composite backing.
having a first "primary" layer of woven jute reinforced with a second "primary" layer of mesh would not necessarily need to be treated with a decomposition agent to decelerate substantial biodegrading nor a stabilizing agent to assist in temporarily holding the fibers. Alternatively, at least one of the above-described finishing applications could be omitted.
The reinforcement layer of mesh aids in laterally stabilizing the turf after the biodegradable backing has substantially decomposed. Nevertheless, this mesh layer is of such a light weight and such an open cell construction as to permit vertical flow therethrough of water and nutrients and also to permit relatively easy aeration therethrough with hollow tines. Even if such an aerating tine should contact the mesh, the mesh is sufficiently thin so as to be frangible, or breakable under such a force.
-11 I- With this embodiment, the non-degradable mesh layer and the biodegradable layer of the backing, the two-"primary" backings, are simultaneously run through a tufting machine, which tufts the non-biodegradable fibers thereto. Thus, with this construction the horizontal portion of the nat is substantially biodegradable, but not completely biodegradable.
These and other features of the invention will be more readily understood in view of the following detailed description and the drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING Figure 1 is a cross-sectional view of a stabilized natural turf in accordance with a first preferred embodiment of the invention.
Figure 2 is a cross-sectional view of the stabilized turf shown in Fig. 1, but after the backing 22 has substantially biodegraded and the stabilized turf has subsequently been aerated.
Figure 3 is a perspective view of a tur stabilizing mat constructed in accordance 15 with another preferred embodiment of the invention.
Figure 4 is a side view of the mat shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 5 is a plan view which schematically shows parallel rows of the stabilized turf of the invention during growth at a sod farm.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING Figure 1 shows, in cross-section, a stabilized natural turf surface or stabilized turf 10 in accordance with a first preferred embodiment of the invention. In the context of this application, the terms stabilized natural turf surface and stabilized turf are used interchangeably.
When in place, the surface 10 includes a compacted subsurface 12, which is typically graded to a desired level with a desired degree of uniformity. If desired, a barrier 14 may' reside on the subsurface 12, the barrier 14 supporting one or more drainage components 15 for draining, 12 subirrigating or heating the surface 10, as disclosed in applicant's PCT Patent Application Serial Nos. PCT/US95/l 1891* and PCT/US96/02207, which are expressly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Alternatively, the natural turf surface 10 may be installed over sand or soil fields which may or may not have a prepared or comnpacted subsurfatce and installed drainage or irrigation components.
Typically, a lower fill layer 16 of growth media, such as sand, soil or the like, resides above the subsurface 12, at a depth which varies depending upon thie application.
Typically, sand sports fields are constru cted with about 6-12 inches of fill layer 16 A *.0 stabilizing mat 18 rests on the lower layer 16. The mat 18 has generally upright fibers 20 which extend generally upwardly from a horizontally disposed backing 22. These fibers 20 are nonbiodegradable and preferably have a length dimension above the backing 22 which is in the range of about 1-2 inches, although the length could be lesser or greater, and a target denier in the range of about 7,600-10,000. Typically the fibers 20 are made from a tape which is fibrillated, and then spun into a thread at a rate of 3/4 twistfmch, although those skilled in the art readily understand that this is only one of several methods of manufacturing the non-biodegradable fibers 20. The fibers 20 may be made of synthetic material, such as polypropylene, polyethylene, nylon, polyester, or they could even be made of a natural matrial which is either inherently nonbiodegradable or treated so as to be non-biodegradable. The fibers 20 are secured to the backing 22 preferably at a density of 11.5 stitches per 3 inch section and a stitch gauge of 3/8" to 5/8".
This is preferably done by tufting the fibers 20 to the backing 22 in a zig zag pattern.
The backing 22 is substantially biodegradable, so that it will substantially decompose within a predetermined time period. Applicant has found that woven jute is a suitable material for the backing 22. This is similar to what was previously done with respect to the manufacture of primary backings for carpet, before the standardized use of synthetic materials for that purpose. However, whereas the jute backing of carpet represented a disadvantage, 13because the jute was susceptible to moisture retention if the carpet became wet, in this application the jute backing 22 provides an agronomic advantage in that the moisture retention promotes growth of the natural grass plants 26. The natural jute backing 22 preferably has a weave density of 15 threads by 13 threads per square inch, resulting in a weight of approximately 9 oz.
per square yard and a sheet width in the range of 12-15 feet. Such a backing 22, as shown in Fig. 1, is completely biodegradable over a sufficient period of time. However, as described above, "complete" decomposition is not necessary, only decomposition such that the backing 22 has little or no remaining horizontal structural integrity. At this point, water flow is unimpeded and the fibers 20 are free'to migrate vertically in response to contact with aerating tines.
10 With the backing 22 of jute as described immediately above, it is believed that complete decomposition will occur within about 8-12 months. However, the horizontal structural integrity will severely diminish within as few as two months, particularly in warmer and wetter *climates such as Florida. Onre that occurs, the backing 22 has "substantially biodegraded." For the embodiment of Fig. 1, the stabilized turf 10 can be aerated at any time 15 it makes agronomic sense to do so. It is not necessary for the backing 22 to completely decompose in order for the aerating tines to pass therethrough and extend therebelow. In the context of this application, the phrase "substantially biodegradable" refers to something which is sufficiently biodegradable, within a given time period, to lose all or most of its horizontal structural integrity. At that point, water and nutrients flow readily in a vertical direction through the space previously occupied by the backing 22. With the backing 22 substantially biodegraded, there is no impeding effect at all on the aerating tines, and these tines cause vertical movement of the fibers Other substantially biodegradable materials such as cotton, flax, hemp, cycel, burlap (sometimes called jute) or the like could also be used for the backing 22. Even more recent man-made biodegradable materials could also be used. Applicant believes that such 14materials currently exist and are used in the diaper making industry. According to the first embodiment, the backing 22 is woven, with transversely and longitudinally extending strands of the same material, such as jute, so that the backing 22 is homogenous. The backing 22 could also be stitched or knitted. The fibers 20 are held to the backing 22 by stitching, tufting, preferably in a zig-zag pattern.
With this embodiment, two secondary backings help to temporarily hold the fibers 20 to the backing 22. One secondary backing is applied prior to tufting the fibers 20 to the jute backing 22, and the second secondary backing is applied thereafter. Each of these secondary backings is applied by using a liquid-coating "finishing" technique recognized in the 10 carpet-making industry. The possible materials for the secondary backing include but are not limited to acrylic latex, starch, calcium carbonate and urea, applied in a dispersing agent and then heated to achieve a desired coating. The amount of coating is usually quantified in dry weight per unit area. According to the first embodiment, acrylic latex was used to produce a dry weight on the primary of about 1.5-4.0 ounces per square yard, with a dry weight of 3 ounces per square i 15 yard being preferable. These secondary backing materials are all considered biodegradable.
Within a period of weeks, they will decompose due to subsurface conditions. Their primary Q..i function is to temporarily assist in holding the fibers 20 during handling and installation. In essence, these materials serve as agents for temporary securement of the fibers. Yet, to some extent they may have an effect on biodegradation time, because they provide a protective coating for the backing 22. Applicants believe that a coating of acrylic latex of this type will extend, or decelerate, substantial biodegrading to about 5-8 months, but that again depends on other factors.
Also, a decomposition agent, specifically zinc omadine, an anti-microbial, was included in the liquid dispersion in a range of about 0-10 parts per million to decelerate decomposition of the backing 22. Applicant used zinc omadine 48% FPS, provided by Olin under product code CPE00306#, in a quantity of about 4 parts per million. If desired, a natural grass growth agent such as a fertilizer or a pesticide may also be included in the liquid dispersion.
Some of the above-identified stabilizing agents also can serve as growth agents, such as calcium carbonate.
The decomposition agent is used because in most climates substantial biodegrading occurs too soon, within two to three months. This usually will not be long enough for sufficient maturation of the root system. Thus, for the woven jute backing 22 according to the first embodiment, the treatment with a specific decomposition agent, such as zinc omadine, causes substantial biodegrading to be delayed up to several years if desired. The amount of the decomposition agent, the type of decomposition agent and the manner of 10 application will depend upon the climate and wetness at the site, the soil conditions at the site, the density and material of the backing 22, the other agents used on the backing 22, and how soon the field needs to be ready for play, among other things. There may be other instances where it is desirable to accelerate dec6mposition. Again, this will depend on the conditions identified above, such as the material and density of the backing 22, and the climate. Other than treating the backing 22, another possible method of accelerating the decomposition rate would be to inoculate, prior to placement of the mat 18, the backing 22 or the fill layer 16 with biological agents which use cellulose from the jute backing 22 for energy.
The prior art Bergevin patents disclose the general concept of a secondary backing, a coating such as latex, on a primary backing which is non-biodegradable, wherein the secondary backing helps to hold the artificial fibers to the backing for about 1-3 weeks but biodegrades thereafter. However, this is the only disclosed backing material which biodegrades.
The primary remains intact over time. In contrast, this invention represents an improvement because the backing 22, which in this case is of homogenous woven jute transversely (weft) and longitudinally (warp) extending biodegradable fibers, substantially biodegrades within a predetermined time period. Once substantially biodegraded, the backing 22 is no hindrance to 16 water or nutrient flow, it does not create any barrier effect, and it also promotes aeration.
The substantial biodegradation is selectively controlled, preferably via the decomposition agent, so that the horizontal structural integrity of the nut 18 remains intact during the important growin period.
An upper fill layer 24 is located above the stabilizing mat 18. Again, as with the low layer 16, the upper layer 24 of growth media may be of sand, or any other particulate material which -promotes plant growth and provides stabilization and cushion, such as diatomaceous material, calcined clay, crunmbed rubber or other organic or inorganic additives.
The upper layer 24 resides within and surrounds the fibers 20 of thle stabilizing mat 18, to 10 laterally support the fibers 20 in a generally upright position and to provide stabilization for the turfsurface 10. Preferably, the upper layer 24 extends about halfway to two-thirds of the way up the vertical lengths of the fibers 20, to allow sufficient room for initial appliction of topdressing, and to reduce the overall weight, which is particularly advantageous in the case of sod firm production. In the first preferred embodiment, the layer 24 preferably resides at least 1 5 ab o uit 0 .5 0 b e lo w t e op of h e fi b e rs 2 0 wit th fi b e rs 2 0 e xte n di ng a b o u t 1 .5 a o v th e backing 22.
Natural grass plants 26 extend upwardly through the upper layer, with the tops 28 of the grass plants 26 extending above the fibers 20. The natural plants 26 also extend downwmardly through the backing 22 and into the lower layer 16. Thus, the tops 28 of the grass plants 26 are above the tops of the fibers 20, and the crowns of the grass plants 26 reside within the upper layer 24, while the roots 30 extend through the backing 22 and terminate in the lower layer 16. The playing surface, the material residing above the upper layer 24 of growth media, comprises both natural grass 26 and non-biodegradable fibers 20. The upper layer 24 and/or the lower layer 16 may be inoculated -with microbes to establish a beneficial population of micro-.organisms, since sand is typically sterile, prior to sodding the upper layer 24 with grass -17plants 26. In a sense, these microbes could be considered a decomposition agent and a growth agent, because depending on their composition and distribution, they could accelerate biodegrading of the backing 22 and also promote growth of the grass 26. To that extent, these effects need to be taken into account in determining the time period for substantial biodegrading.
The grass plants 26 can be generated by seeding, sprigging or even laying down sod which has been jet washed to remove undesired soil and particulate.
It is anticipated that exposing approximately the upper portions of the fibers above the upper layer 24 will result in the "ballooning" of the tips of the fibers 20. Ballooning, as will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, results when the exposed tips of the 10 fibers 20 fray and/or fluff which is beneficial to the turf system 10 because it will promote fibrillation and movement of the fibers 20 throughout the depth of the turf 10 in response to normal wear, aeration and/or other standard turf maintenance procedures. It also provides a less slick playing surface in the event natural turf is worn away.
Fig. 2 shows the backing 22 after substantial biodegradation has occurred, and 15 after topdressing 24a has been applied. In contrast to Fig. 1, where the fibers 22 occupied only a vertical band which corresponded to upper layer 24, Fig. 2 shows the fibers 20 vertically distributed within a vertical band 20a. This band 20a is greater in vertical dimension than the fibers 20 themselves, because the fibers 20 have migrated vertically. This migration occurs in response to movement of the aerating tines downwardly through the turf 10 during aeration. This migration effectively produces this subsurface stabilizing band 20a. Thus, aerating of the turf not only produces the commonly known agronomic benefits, it also assures continued stabilization of the turf 10 long after installation, by continuing to redistribute the fibers These advantages are possible only because the backing 22 is substantially biodegradable within a predetermined time period.
19 A stand count of 5 x 5 refers to a mesh with 25 cells per square inch, in 5 rows and 5 columns.
Applicant believes that a strand count as low as 2 x 2 -would also work, but that a strand counmt with larger openings would possibly cause problems with aeration tines due to thickness of material.
To make a mat 118 which has a composite backing 122 of a firs layer 122b of homogenous woven biodegradable material and a second layer 122a of non-biodegradable mesh, the layers 122a and 122b are simultaneously run through a tufting machine to secure the nonbiodegradable fibers 120 thereto. Thus, other thani the tufted fibers 120, there is nothing holding the layers 122a and 122b together. The fibers 120 are tufted in a predetermined density, by stitching with a 5/8" gauge, in an acute zig zag pattern to maximize the amount of material on 9:::*the underside of the backing 122. This manner of fiber securement provides additional initial horizontal strength--for the mat 118 and increases the ability of the turf 10 to vertically redistribute the fibers 120 through the rootzone during aeration (Fig. With this reinforcement layer 122a, it may not be necessary to trea the backing 122 with a decomposition or a stabilizing agent because of the added lateral stability provided by the mesh. Thus, the need to apply one or more secondary coatings in finishing steps may be eliminated. On the other hand, it may be desirable to apply one "finishing" treatment on the backside of the mat 118 to include one or more of the following agents: a decomposition agent, a stabilizing agent and a growth agent.
With either mat 18 or mat 118, the benefits of the invention result from the ability to practice standard agronomic maintenance principles for the turf 10, aerating and topdressinz, whenever desired after installation. As noted previously, prior stabilized turfs either did not recommend these practices, or resulted in other disadvantages if these turf maintenance practices were used.
If the stabilized turf 10 is initially grown at a remote site such as a sod farmn, i preferably 12 to 15 feet wide sections of any desired length, the mat 18 (or 118) is rolled out on -18- As noted above, the backing 22 may be woven, knitted or tufted. The backing 22 may also be reinforced for added strength for certain applications. The reinforcement may be done by increasing the thickness of the transverse and/or longitudinal fibers, or by adding a synthetic strand, fiber or filament such a polypropylene. These added strands could be laced into the weave of the backing 22 or perhaps substituted for the transverse or the longitudinal fibers.
However, it is important that the backing 22, even if it is a composite of this type and not homogenous, be substantially biodegradable.
Fig. 3 shows a second preferred embodiment of this invention. A turf 10 made according to this embodiment would be identical to the turf 10 of Figs. 1-2 except that the mat 10 118 is different. More specifically, mat 118 includes a backing 122 with a non-biodegradable open cell web 122a for reinforcement. Stated another way, the backing 122 is a composite which has two "primary" backings, or layers. The first is a completely biodegradable layer 122b, of a material such as jute, and the second is a non-biodegradable layer 122a, such as a synthetic web.
Preferably, the web 122a is made of non-biodegradable polypropylene, to provide some minimal 15 ongoing lateral structural integrity for the mat 118. However, the cells of the web 122a are sufficiently open and the longitudinal and transverse strands are sufficiently thin that the composite backing 122 is still considered substantially biodegradable. This is because there is sufficient openness to allow passage therethrough of water and nutrients and there is no barrier effect created. Also, the fibers 120 are relatively free to migrate in response to contact with aerating tines. The individual strands of the web 122a will break if they happen to be contacted by hollow tines during aeration.
For the mat 118, the composite backing 122 included a layer 122a made from polypropylene, with a strand count of 5 x 5 and a weight of 1.728 ounces per yard. This layer 122a is commercially available from Conwed Plastics of Roseville, Minnesota, and identified as Product No. R07821-002. The "strand count" refers to the number of "cells" per square inch.
a synthetic barrier of some sort, such as plastic. The plastic barrier inhibits root growth into the ground below, thereby eliminating the need to cut the turf 10 at the roots prior to transport. The structure of the turf 10 thereabove remains the same as shown in Fig. 1 except that the grass 26 has not yet grown in and there is no lower layer 16. That is, the upper layer 24 of growth media is filled in around the fibers 20 (or 120), preferably leaving at least about 0.5 inches of the fibers extending thereabove. The upper layer 24 is then seeded, sprigged or planted with power washed sod, or other known turfing method.
Once a sufficient growing time period has passed and there has been sufficient growth of the roots 30 into and through the backing 22 (or 122), the natural turf 10 is ready to 10 be cut longitudinally and rolled in desired lengths for transport to a site for use, such as an athletic stadium. In Fig. 5, the lines 34 show longitudinal seams extending along adjacent rows of sections of turf 10. Reference lines 36 show transverse seams. Reference numerals 10a-10f show the locations of individual sections of turf 10. Sections 10a and 10b are in one row, while sections 10c and 10d and 10e and 10f are in the next two rows, respectively. Sections 10c and 15 10d have been rolled up, while the other sections are shown in place.
The individual sections of the turf 10 may be joined to adjacent sections by securement of the edges of the corresponding backings 22 (or 122). This can be done by sewing with a fabric thread such as jute or a synthetic thread such as polypropylene. It can also be done by stapling the backings 22 together. Thin metal staples typically degrade by rusting within about 8 months. Securing the adjacent sections of turf 10 is beneficial whether the turf 10 is initially installed on-site or grown at a sod farm. For turf 10 grown at a sod farm, it is particularly advantageous along the transverse, or butt joints, of sections residing in a single row.
This is because rolling of the turf 10 for transport to a remote site generates a stretching force on the turf 10. This stretching force can cause separation of the turf 10, particularly along the transverse seams of adjacent sections, for instance along the seam between rolled sections -21and 10d (Fig. Securing the transverse edges together eliminates the risk of the turf 10 pulling apart during rolling.
Securement of adjacent turf sections together also helps at the field site, whether grown in initially or moved thereto from a sod farm. With some prior turfs, including those with artificial backings, it was sometimes necessary to provide a reinforced foundation underlying adjoining turf sections, to minimize differential settling or vertical shifting of one section relative to an adjacent section. On the other hand, when the stabilized turf 10 of this invention is installed on-site at the athletic facility, the stability of the turf 10 is significantly increased because the secured together adjacent sections neither shift relative to one another nor become exposed. The 10 following examples refer to grow-in installations.
fO..
S S* EXAMPLE I According to the first preferred embodiment of this invention, a laser graded surface is covered with a stabilized synthetic, sand-filled mat 18 constructed of 100% 15 polypropylene fibers 20 (10,000 denier, .75 twist, approx. 970g/m 2 stitched (tufted) in a chevron pattern into a woven backing 22 made of natural and biodegradable fibers. The fiber mat 22 has a plain weave, with a fiber count of 15 x 13 count, a face weight of approx. 340g/m 2 and is manufactured in 4.6m widths. It is treated with a stabilizing agent and a decomposition agent, as described previously, to extend the time required for biodegradation once placed in the field and to help secure the fibers 20, as described previously. The backing 22 including this coating has a minimum weight of 408 g/m 2 The polypropylene fibers 20 tufted into the mat 18 extend 38mm above the surface in a vertical orientation. The manufactured mat 18 has a minimum total weight of 1.375kg/m 2 The mat 18 is rolled onto a laser graded sand surface, adjacent rolls abutted and the 22 seams secured together to create a continuous, seamless Itcarpetl across the entire playing surface.
Once installed, the vertically stitched fibers 22 are filled to approximately of their height slightly less than 25 mm) with the same specified sand as was used to create the rootzone. The sand is applied in lifts and broomed into the mat to assure the synthetic fibers remain upright. After all the sand has been spread the surface is planted with top quality, nursery grown hybrid Bermudagrass sprigs, such as GN-1, or similar. The grow-in period begins immediately following completion of the sprigging process and is expected to last about eight weeks, and possibly longer.
EXAMPLE II This example is identical to Example I, except that mat 118 is used instead of mat 18. This means that the badkig 122 includes two primaries, one 122b being biodegradable jute and the other 122a being a polypropylene mesh with a strand count of 5 x 5. The fibers 120 are tufted thereto. Also, the treatment for the backing 118 may differ, because no decomposition agent nor any stabilizing agent for the fibers 120 may be necessary, or at least only one side may need to be coated.
The stabilized natural turf 10 of this invention provides a stable playing surface with a stable base and a completely natural turf look and feel, with the playing surface comprising natural grass 26 and, to some extent, the upper ends of the fibers 20 (or 120).
Eventually, the fibers 20 become buried due to topdressing applications. But by then the backing 22 (or 122) has substantially biodegraded. By then the fibers 20 (or 120) have also vertically migrated and reoriented. These results are produced because common turf management practices, namely topdressing and aeration, can be repeatedly used with this stabilized turf These practices can be used after the initial grow in primarily because of the relative height of -23the upper layer 24 with respect to the fibers 20 and because the backing 22 is substantially biodegradable.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be readily understood by those skilled in the art that variations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, there may well be other materials for making the backing 22 of the mat 18 substantially biodegradable. Moreover, for such other materials, the weave density or the fiber thickness may be subject to variation. Moreover, depending upon the growth environment and the agronomic conditions, the relative thickness of the lower layer, and the upper layer relative to the non-biodegradable fibers may change. These factors may also depend upon the type of grass being used.
We claim:
Claims (20)
1. A natural turf surface suitable for athletics comprising: a compacted subsoil; a first layer of growth media located above the subsoil; a mat supported on the first layer, the mat including a substantially biodegradable root permeable backing oriented horizontally and a plurality of substantially vertical artificial fibers held by the backing; a second layer of growth media located on the mat; natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending downwardly io through the second layer and the mat and into the first layer and the crowns extending above the horizontal backing; and the backing including a decomposition affecting agent so that at least some of the backing biodegrades within a predetermined time period, thereby to facilitate hollow tine aeration of the natural turf down to the depth of the first layer and to promote dispersion Is of the fibers within a stabilization zone having a greater vertical dimension than the second layer.
2. The natural turf surface of claim 1 wherein the backing is woven fabric.
The natural turf surface of claim 1 or 2 wherein the backing is of homogenous composition.
4. A stabilizer for stabilizing the subsurface of a natural turf surface, made according to the process comprising: creating a fabric backing of substantially biodegradable material, the backing being of sufficient porosity to permit downward growth therethrough of the roots of natural grass plants; treating at least one surface of the backing with a decomposition affecting agent to affect decomposition of the backing within a predetermined time period; and securing artificial fibers to the backing, at a predetermined density, thereby to stabilize the natural grass plants.
The stabilizer of claim 4 wherein said creating includes weaving a primary backing and said treating includes applying a secondary to the woven primary backing.
6. A method of preparing and maintaining a stabilized natural turf, comprising: preparing a subsurface; placing a first layer of growth media on the prepared subsurface; [R:\LIBLL] 12255.doc:vjp placing a mat on the first layer, the mat having a substantially biodegradable fabric backing and a plurality of upwardly extending artificial fibers held thereto; laying a second layer of growth media on the mat, so that the top of the Ssecond layer resides below the upper ends of the artificial fibers; growing natural grass plants in the second layer, with roots thereof extending downwardly through the mat and into the first layer resulting in a stabilized turf; and aerating the stabilized turf with hollow tines down to the first layer after 1o at least some of the backing has begun to biodegrade, thereby to facilitate dispersion of the fibers within the first and second layers of growth media.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein at least one of the layers of growth media and/or the backing has been treated with a decomposition affecting agent to cause said biodegrading to occur within a predetermined time period, thereby to facilitate 15 aeration down to the first layer.
8. A method of making a field suitable for athletics comprising: growing a surface of natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending downwardly into an upper layer of growth media and a lower layer of growth media, the upper and lower layers of growth media being separated by a mat having a substantially biodegradable backing oriented horizontally and a plurality of substantially vertical artificial fibers held by the backing; and .:oooi aerating the surface down to the lower layer of growth media with hollow tines S. after the backing has begun to biodegrade, whereby the aerating vertically disperses and reorients the artificial fibers throughout the upper and lower layers of growth media, thereby to increase the stabilized zone for the roots of the natural grass plants.
9. A method of making a field suitable for athletics comprising: growing a surface of natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending downwardly into an upper layer of growth media and a lower layer of growth media, the upper and lower layers of growth media being separated by a mat having a water permeable and root permeable backing oriented horizontally and a plurality of substantially vertical artificial fibers held by the backing, the backing having a construction, density and composition selected to optimize water and root permeability therethrough; and [R:\LIBLL] I 2255.doc:vjp aerating the surface down to the lower layer of growth media with hollow tines after a predetermined time period, thereby to reduce the buildup of organic residue above the backing and to increase the root permeability of the backing.
A stabilized natural turf comprising: a bottom support surface; a lower layer of growth media located above the support surface; a mat supported on the lower layer, the mat having a backing oriented horizontally and fibers extending generally upwardly therefrom, the backing including a first degradable primary and a second non-degradable primary which is initially more 1o permeable than the first primary, the first primary being selected to have a composition, weight and density to sufficiently degrade so as to eventually become more permeable, over time, than the second primary; an upper layer of growth media located above the mat; and natural grass plants having roots and crowns, the roots extending downwardly through the upper layer and through the backing and into the lower layer, and the crowns located above the backing, the tops of the grass plants and the fibers extending above the upper layer.
11. The stabilized natural turf of claim 10 wherein the first primary is substantially biodegradable.
12. The stabilized natural turf of one of claims 10 or 11 wherein the second primary comprises a reinforcing non-biodegradable mesh.
13. The stabilized natural turf of any one of claims 10, 11, or 12 wherein the S fibers are secured to the first and second primaries of the backing by tufting and except for the tufted securement affected by the fibers, the first and second primaries are otherwise unattached.
14. The stabilized natural turf of any one of claims 10 to 13 wherein the backing or the growth media includes a decomposition agent to control the predetermined time period for biodegrading.
A stabilizer for a stabilized natural turf, made according to the process comprising: creating a backing, the backing including a first woven primary and a second primary, the two primaries together being sufficiently root permeable to permit passage therethrough by roots of natural grass plants; and tufting a plurality of fibers to the two primaries, the fibers adapted to extend generally upwardly when the two primaries are oriented horizontally on a foundation. [R:\LIBLL] 12255.doc:vjp 27
16. The stabilizer of claim 15 wherein the first woven primary is substantially biodegradable.
17. The stabilizer of claim 15 and further comprising: applying a secondary to the backing after tufting.
18. The stabilizer of claim 17 wherein the secondary includes at least one of the following: a decomposition agent, a stabilizing agent and a growth agent.
19. The stabilizer of claim 15 wherein the first primary is moisture retaining.
20. The stabilizer of claim 15 wherein the creating occurs by simultaneous feeding both primaries of the backing to a tufting machine and tufting the fibers to the backing. Dated 12 December, 2001 Technology Licensing Corp. 1 Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON *ooooo o* o [R:\LIBLL] 12255.doc:vjp
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU97308/01A AU769873B2 (en) | 1997-06-06 | 2001-12-18 | Stabilized turf for athletic field |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/870541 | 1997-06-06 | ||
AU78092/98A AU738632B2 (en) | 1997-06-06 | 1998-06-08 | Stabilized turf for athletic field |
AU97308/01A AU769873B2 (en) | 1997-06-06 | 2001-12-18 | Stabilized turf for athletic field |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU78092/98A Division AU738632B2 (en) | 1997-06-06 | 1998-06-08 | Stabilized turf for athletic field |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU9730801A AU9730801A (en) | 2002-02-14 |
AU769873B2 true AU769873B2 (en) | 2004-02-05 |
Family
ID=31953419
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU97308/01A Expired AU769873B2 (en) | 1997-06-06 | 2001-12-18 | Stabilized turf for athletic field |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU769873B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102015113210A1 (en) | 2015-08-11 | 2017-02-16 | heiler GmbH & Co. KG | Fiber-reinforced turf layer |
CN115029991A (en) * | 2022-07-07 | 2022-09-09 | 上海天路弹性材料集团股份有限公司 | Artificial turf layer base, artificial turf layer, mixed turf and manufacturing method thereof |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0403008A1 (en) * | 1989-06-12 | 1990-12-19 | Heidemij Realisatie B.V. | Sports field with natural grass and artificial grass and a method for laying same |
US5586408A (en) * | 1992-06-22 | 1996-12-24 | Turf Systems International, Inc. | Surface for sports and other uses |
WO1997007662A1 (en) * | 1995-08-31 | 1997-03-06 | Hans Gilgen | Method of producing greenery matting and greenery matting produced thereby |
-
2001
- 2001-12-18 AU AU97308/01A patent/AU769873B2/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0403008A1 (en) * | 1989-06-12 | 1990-12-19 | Heidemij Realisatie B.V. | Sports field with natural grass and artificial grass and a method for laying same |
US5586408A (en) * | 1992-06-22 | 1996-12-24 | Turf Systems International, Inc. | Surface for sports and other uses |
WO1997007662A1 (en) * | 1995-08-31 | 1997-03-06 | Hans Gilgen | Method of producing greenery matting and greenery matting produced thereby |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU9730801A (en) | 2002-02-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU738632B2 (en) | Stabilized turf for athletic field | |
US6216389B1 (en) | Stabilized natural turf with decomposition agent | |
DE69525831T2 (en) | LAYERING STRUCTURE FOR PLANT BREEDING, LAYERING STRUCTURE FOR NATURAL LAWN, METHOD FOR BREEDING LAWN GRASS AND METHOD FOR LAYING LAWN LAYERING STRUCTURES | |
EP2815028B1 (en) | Mixed turf | |
CA2984721C (en) | Hybrid turf surface and support therefor | |
US12144292B2 (en) | Hybrid grass support structure with stone wool layer | |
EP3114282B1 (en) | Mixed turf | |
AU769873B2 (en) | Stabilized turf for athletic field | |
EP3623530B1 (en) | Hybrid grass support structure with stone wool layer and biodegradable box comprising such structure | |
JPH0833406A (en) | Natural lawn sheet structure | |
JPH08228513A (en) | Plant growing sheet structural body for growing plant such as turf, etc., and natural turf structural body |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
MK14 | Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired |