[go: up one dir, main page]

AU657959B2 - Spectral maxima sound processor - Google Patents

Spectral maxima sound processor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU657959B2
AU657959B2 AU17065/92A AU1706592A AU657959B2 AU 657959 B2 AU657959 B2 AU 657959B2 AU 17065/92 A AU17065/92 A AU 17065/92A AU 1706592 A AU1706592 A AU 1706592A AU 657959 B2 AU657959 B2 AU 657959B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
channels
amplitude
signals
sound
amplitude signals
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU17065/92A
Other versions
AU1706592A (en
Inventor
Hugh J. Mcdermott
Andrew E. Vandali
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Melbourne
Original Assignee
University of Melbourne
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Melbourne filed Critical University of Melbourne
Publication of AU1706592A publication Critical patent/AU1706592A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU657959B2 publication Critical patent/AU657959B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Prostheses (AREA)
  • Electrophonic Musical Instruments (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Description

AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 P/00/011 201610 I Regulation 3.2(2) 6579595
ORIGINAL
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Application Number: Lodged: Invention Title: SPECTRAL MA~XIMA SOUND PROCESSOR
S
S. S S S The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to u SPECTRAL MAXIMA SOUND PROCESSOR FIELD OF INVENTION The present invention relates to a method of processing received acoustic data, particularly but not exclusively for stimulating via implanted electrode arrays.
BACKROUND
The general technique of stimulating via implanted electrode arrays is known from various disclosures, such as U.S. patent no. 4532930 to Crosby et al; U.S. patent no. 4207441 to Ricard et al; and U.S. patent no.
4611598 to Hortmann et al. Such techniques generally involve implanting an electrode array into the cochlea to produce a sensation of hearing, connecting the array by direct or indirect means to a stimulation device, and modulating the stimulations in accordance with a signal. This signal is generally produced by i." processing in some fashion the electrical output of a microphone.
15 Many known processing techniques concentrate on utilising models of how the sensation of sound is detected by the brain in response to 000 particular stimuli. Thus, th3 data is processed to some extent with the object of emphasising particular sorts of information in the stimulation of the electrode :array.
20 In a paper by Wilson et. al., Processing Strategies for Cochlear Implants, published in 1988, a processing strategy is disclosed utilising a bank of 4 or 6 bandpass filters, the largest 2 or 4 amplitudes in the defined channels being used as the basis for stimulation. The paper states that using more channels and selecting more channels from the larger set of channels, will improve performance of the processing strategy. There is no discussion of a preferred number of channels, or of how to choose an appropriate number of channels to select, in the case of more than 6 channels being provided by the filter bank SUMMARY OF INVENTION According to the present invention, electrical signals corresponding to received sound signals are processed by filter means to provide a signal corresponding to amplitude in at least 10 analysis channels. A predetermined 2 number of the amplitude signals are then chosen as the basis for stimulation, based on those analysis channels having the greatest amplitude, providing the amplitude in the channel exceeds a predefined level. The predetermined number of channels chosen to modulate stimuli is at least 4, and less than or equal to half the number of analysis channels.
Preferably, the array is stimulated at a constant rate and the stimuli are delivered non-simultaneously.
The prior art technique utilising only 6 analysis channels does not, it is believed, provide sufficient information to enable optimal sound discrimination by the user. Using fewer analysis channels generally results in poorer discrimination between similar sound signals. However, it has been determined by the inventors that there is also an upper limit on the number of channels which should be used as the basis for stimulation. The ability to usefully discriminate sounds is likely to decline also if too many channels are 15 used. The resulting extensive spread of stimulation within the cochlea may diminish the user's ability to discriminate frequency information. Selecting fewer channels produces more localised stimulation, from which users can extract information more easily. For example, if all 10 from 10 channels are used as a basis for stimulation, too much information in relation to each sample, with too little discrimination, is presented to a user.
Stimuli are preferably presented sequentially, and presenting each stimulus takes a finite time, thus the time taken for presenting stimuli corresponding to a given sound sample increases as the number of channels selected (and hence the maximum number of stimuli presented per sample period) increases. Consequently, the number of channels selected according to the present sound processing technique operates to place an upper limit on the rate of stimulation. Higher rates of stimulation are more effective at providing users with information about rapidly changing or brief events in the sound signal. Accordingly, the present invention provides an upper limit cn the number of channels selected, so as to provide a balance between the quantity and resolution of information in the frequency domain, and resolution in the time domain.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS The invention will be described with reference to the accompanying figures, in which: Figure 1 is a block diagram of an illustrative implanted neural stimulation system; and Figure 2 is a block diagram of a sound processing system according to the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONL Referring to Figure 1, this illustrates in overview a system for stimulating an electrode array in accordance with a processed signal.
An electrode array 1, implanted into a cochlea, connects via cable 2 to a receiver stimulator' unit (RSU) 3. The entire implanted system may be of conventional type, such as the "Cochlear Mini-System 22".
1 exra The implanted system receives control signals and power from an 15 external speech processor unit, preferably via a tuned coil RF system 5, 6 as illustrated. However, any alternative connection technique such as percutaneous connection may be employed.
The coil 6 carries a signal modulated by the processor 7 so as to cause the RSU 3 to stimulate the electrodes in the electrode array in the desired 20 sequence, timing and amplitude.
The processor 7 in turn receives electrical analog signals from a microphone 8 worn by the user.
The present invention is concerned with the operation of the processor and particularly the method of processing the incoming electrical ignal.
It is emphasised that while the invention is described in relation to a cochlear implant system, it is also applicable to speech processing in general, hearing aids, voice recognition, speech synthesis and tactile presentation of sound.
Referring to Figure 2, sound received by the microphone 8 produces a corresponding electrical signal. Sensitivity control 21 provides an adjustable attenuation to allow to some extent for the level of ambient sound.
The signal is then pre-amplified and optionally compressed 22, The signal is then processed by a bank 23 of parallel filters tuned to adjacent frequency channels. In a preferred embodiment there are 16 channels with centre frequencies from 250 to 5400 Hz, and the filter bank is a single chip device. Preferably, filter spacing is linear up to 1650 Hz and logarithmic beyond in the case of an analog implementation.
Each channel in the illustrated analog implementation includes a bandpass filter 24n, then a rectifier 25n and low pass filter 26n to provide an estimate of amplitude for each channel. Preferably each low pass filter has a cut-off frequency of about 200 Hz. The output signals from each channel are then digitised.
The digitised outputs are modified by the microprocessor 27 so as to reflect the normal variation of hearing sensitivity with frequency. The set of S: outputs is multiplied by a set of corresponding coefficients so as to result in a i 15 slight increase in system sensitivity at around 400 Hz, a reduction at higher frequencies, and subsequently a gradual increase to a broad peak in sensitivity at about 4 kHz.
The microprocessor then selects the six largest channel amplitudes at intervals of approximately 4ms. It is noted that this would not normally 20 represent six different spectral peaks, as adjacent channels may share energy from a single spectral peak. It will be appreciated that depending upon the corresponding sound signal, there may be fewer than six or no channels stimulated in a given period, if there is no sound, or sound which is very narrow spectrally.
The selected amplitudes are then converted into stimulus current levels. As with known devices, the current levels corresponding to audible threshold and maximum comfortable level for each configuration of electrode stimulation in a particular patient are empirically determined and stored in a memory means 28. The amplitudes are then mapped into the individual stimulus range for each implanted electrode set. An alternative method of converting amplitudes into stimulus levels is to vary pulse widths instead of or as well as current levels. The processor selects the appropriate active electrode for each stimulus pulse according to the frequency of the channel. The data is then encoded 32, and transmitted 33 by RF coil 6.
Microprocessor 27 is also connected to a loudness control 31, which users find convenient to use in association with the sensitivity control 21.
Loudness control 31 essentially allows the current amplitude levels (and/or pulse widths) to be adjusted within a predefined range without affecting system sensitivity to the input signals.
Generally, the 16 most-apical stimulating electrode positions are allocated in tonotopic order to the 16 channels of the filter bank. The channel selection technique ensures that the maximum rate of stimulation on any electrode is 250 Hz.
It is emphasised that the six from sixteen channel system described is merely one arrangement and systems with less or more channels of filtering and with less or more channels selected are encompassed within the invention.
15 Other rates of stimulation and alternative temporal ordering of the stimulus pulses may also provide satisfactory or improved performance.
As an alternative, the invention may be implemented using a digital signal processing (DSP) implementation. Preferably this uses a DSP56001 integrated circuit from Motorola.
20 One digital implementation employs a 128-point radix-2 fast fourier transform (FFT) to provide 65 discrete spectral values linearly spaced from 0 to 5.85 KHz (sampling rate 11.7 KHz). The FFT is computed every 4ms from a 10.9 ms long time series of speech waveform samples. Each successive FFT computation therefore overlaps the previous and subsequent series by 6.9 ms.
Prior to computation of the FFT the time series is windowed by a shaping function to provide the desired spectral and temporal performance for the filter bank. The windowing function consists of a modified Daniell window (flat top with tapered sides in the frequency domain) modified by a Kaiser window (with theta pi). It provides a 180 Hz filter bandwidth at -3 dB points.
Note the FFT spectral sample spacing is 91 Hz, thus every 2nd sample is omitted leaving 32 spectral samples spaced 182 Hz apart. The DC (0 Hz) value is also omitted.
The 32 discrete spectral samples are then reduced to 16 spectral estimates by summation of power in adjacent spectral samples. The resulting 16-channel filter bank is arranged such that the lowest 8 channels have equal bandwidth and are linearly spaced. The highest 8 channels are preferably arranged for an approximately logarithmic increase In filter bandwidth and spacing. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that an exactly logarithmic spacing of channel centre frequencies is not possible in practice in a system utilising FFT in the implementation described. As the available frequencies according to the present embodiment are quantised in units of 91 Hz, it is necessary to compromise the spacings so as to provide approximate logarithmic spacings within the quantisation restrictions of the system. Preferred centre frequencies of the 16 filter channels are: i. 274, 457, 640, 823, 1005, 1188, 1371, 1554, 1828, 2194, 2559, 2925, 3382, 3747, 4296, 5118 Hz.
15 Each of the 16 spectral channels is assigned to a unique stimulating electrode position in a tonotopic arrangement. Six electrodes are stimulated during each analysis period every 4 ms). The six electrodes that are stimulated are selected based on the instantaneous amplitudes of the 16 spectral components. The six largest spectral components In each analysis 20 period are selected, as in the analog version. The amplitudes of the six selected spectral components are transformed using a loudness growth power function *see and are then mapped into the dynamic range of the stimulating electrodes. The six stimuli are ordered from largest to smallest amplitudes and are presented to the implantee in quick succession every 4 ms. It will be appreciated that alternative temporal ordering, for example tonotopic ordering, may be used.
It is also noted that the present invention results in a relatively constant rate of stimulation, contrary to many prior techniques, however experimental evidence suggests that the perception of sound by users using the Inventive speech processor is at least as good as or better than the perception of sound using other processors.
It Is further noted that as no assumptions about re-elved sound being speech are made, the system should provide Improved performance over known techniques for non-speech sounds.
SELECTION OF ASSOCIATED COMPONENTS AND CIRCUIT DESIGN In order to obtain satisfactory results with the invention, attention needs to be paid to the following points.
Microphone characteristics and frequency response will affect the quality of signal input to the processor, and some variation of the equalisation technique described above may improve performance.
Attention should also be paid to RF interference between the microphone and the transmitter coil when these are mounted on a common headset. This coupling produces components in the audio range. Signal to noise ratio may be improved by including a suitable preamplifier gain at the headset or microphone end of the cable.
It is also necessary to ensure that power supply is properly 15 regulated to avoid ripple and noise.
It will be appreciated that other implementations and variations are possible within the spirit and scope of the invention.
4**e *co ooo

Claims (7)

1. A sound processing device for an auditory prosthesis, comprising: in combination:m means for receiving an electrical signal representing a sound signal; filter means for providing amplitude signals corresponding to the amplitude of said sound signal in each of a number of spaced frequency analysis channels, said number of analysis channels being at least means for selocting up to a predetermined number of the amplitude signals according to the ones of said amplitude signals having the greatest magnitude, said amplitude signals being selected only if the amplitude In the respective analysis channel exceeds a predetermined level, said predetermined number being at least 4, but less than or equal to half the number of analysis channels; and means for producing a plurality of output signals, each output signal corresponding to one of said selected amplitude signals and hence to one of said frequency channels.
2. A device according to claim 1, wherein said frequency channels are linearly spaced up to about 1650 Hz and approximately logarithmically spaced thereafter. to*
3. A device according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said number of channels is 16, and said predetermined number Is 6.
4, A sound processing device for producing stimulus signals for an electrode array of an auditory prosthesis, comprising: means for receiving an electrical signal representing a sound signal; filter means for providing amplitude signals corresponding to the amplitude of said sound signal in at least 10 spaced frequency channels; means for selecting a predetermined number of the amplitude signals according to the ones of said amplitude signals having the greatest magnitude, said predetermined number being at least 4, but less than or equal to half the number of channels; memory means for storing individual stimulus current response characteristics; means for mapping said selected amplitude signals into the stored current response characteristics and generating a corresponding current signal; and means for communicating said corresponding current signals to an electrode array such that electrodes in a location corresponding to a frequency channel are stimulated with the corresponding current signal.
A device according to claim 4, further comprising normalizing means for modifying said amplitude signals prior to said means for selecting, such that the amplitude signals are multiplied by a set of coefficients corresponding to the variation of hearing sensitivity with frequency.
6. A device according to claim 4 or claim 5, wherein said number of channels is 16, and said predetermined number is 6.
7. A device according to claim 4, wherein said current signals comprise a plurality of sets of stimuli presented temporally from largest to i smallest amplitude. ABSTRACT An improved sound processor is disclosed, with particular application to stimulation of implanted electrode arrays, such as cochlear implants. The processor channelizes received sound signals into at least ten analysis channels to produce amplitude signals for each channel. A predefined number of channels with the largest amplitude are used to modulate stimuli for the implanted array. The predefined number is at least four, and less than or equal to half the number of analysis channels. 6 *5o* *o S o S o
AU17065/92A 1991-07-02 1992-05-21 Spectral maxima sound processor Ceased AU657959B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP16180291A JPH06214597A (en) 1991-07-02 1991-07-02 Sound processor
JP3-161802 1991-07-02

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU1706592A AU1706592A (en) 1993-01-07
AU657959B2 true AU657959B2 (en) 1995-03-30

Family

ID=15742195

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU17065/92A Ceased AU657959B2 (en) 1991-07-02 1992-05-21 Spectral maxima sound processor

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH06214597A (en)
AU (1) AU657959B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2054428C (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001031632A1 (en) 1999-10-26 2001-05-03 The University Of Melbourne Emphasis of short-duration transient speech features
WO2010088722A1 (en) 2009-02-03 2010-08-12 Hearworks Pty Limited Enhianced envelope encoded tone, sound procrssor and system
US7787956B2 (en) 2002-05-27 2010-08-31 The Bionic Ear Institute Generation of electrical stimuli for application to a cochlea

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AUPQ261299A0 (en) * 1999-09-02 1999-09-23 Bionic Ear Institute, The Improved sound processor for cochlear implants
AUPQ952700A0 (en) * 2000-08-21 2000-09-14 University Of Melbourne, The Sound-processing strategy for cochlear implants
AUPS259002A0 (en) * 2002-05-27 2002-06-13 Bionic Ear Institute, The Generation of electrical stimuli for application to a cochlea
JP5032122B2 (en) * 2003-12-10 2012-09-26 ザ バイオニック イヤ インスティテュート Delayed stimulation in auditory prostheses
US7779153B2 (en) 2005-10-27 2010-08-17 Cochlear Limited Automated collection of operational data from distributed medical devices

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4390756A (en) * 1980-01-30 1983-06-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for generating electrocutaneous stimulation patterns for the transmission of acoustic information
US4611598A (en) * 1984-05-30 1986-09-16 Hortmann Gmbh Multi-frequency transmission system for implanted hearing aids
US5095904A (en) * 1989-09-08 1992-03-17 Cochlear Pty. Ltd. Multi-peak speech procession

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4390756A (en) * 1980-01-30 1983-06-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for generating electrocutaneous stimulation patterns for the transmission of acoustic information
US4611598A (en) * 1984-05-30 1986-09-16 Hortmann Gmbh Multi-frequency transmission system for implanted hearing aids
US5095904A (en) * 1989-09-08 1992-03-17 Cochlear Pty. Ltd. Multi-peak speech procession

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001031632A1 (en) 1999-10-26 2001-05-03 The University Of Melbourne Emphasis of short-duration transient speech features
US7787956B2 (en) 2002-05-27 2010-08-31 The Bionic Ear Institute Generation of electrical stimuli for application to a cochlea
WO2010088722A1 (en) 2009-02-03 2010-08-12 Hearworks Pty Limited Enhianced envelope encoded tone, sound procrssor and system
EP3975587A1 (en) 2009-02-03 2022-03-30 Cochlear Limited Enhanced envelope encoded tone sound processor and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH06214597A (en) 1994-08-05
CA2054428A1 (en) 1993-01-03
CA2054428C (en) 1997-11-18
AU1706592A (en) 1993-01-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5597380A (en) Spectral maxima sound processor
US8121698B2 (en) Outer hair cell stimulation model for the use by an intra-cochlear implant
US8135152B2 (en) Method and apparatus for envelope detection and enhancement of pitch cue of audio signals
US9393414B2 (en) Inner hair cell stimulation model for use by a cochlear implant system
EP2476267B1 (en) Reducing an effect of ambient noise within an auditory prosthesis system
US7082332B2 (en) Sound processor for a cochlear implant
US4617913A (en) Artificial hearing device and method
EP2310086B1 (en) Tonality-based optimization of sound sensation for a cochlear implant patient
EP2482923B1 (en) Systems for representing different spectral components of an audio signal presented to a cochlear implant patient
US7010354B1 (en) Sound processor for cochlear implants
US7647119B1 (en) Distributed compression amplitude mapping for a cochlear stimulation system
AU657959B2 (en) Spectral maxima sound processor
US8065016B2 (en) Delayed stimulation in auditory prostheses
AU2014321433B2 (en) Dynamic stimulation channel selection
US20070239227A1 (en) Frequency modulated stimulation strategy for cochlear implant system
CN102525734A (en) Electronic cochlea virtual channel signal processing system based on peak value selection and method
CN114073818A (en) Cochlear implant system with optimized frame coding
AU2004242512B2 (en) Combined stimulation for auditory prosthesis