AU2012201562B2 - Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina - Google Patents
Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2012201562B2 AU2012201562B2 AU2012201562A AU2012201562A AU2012201562B2 AU 2012201562 B2 AU2012201562 B2 AU 2012201562B2 AU 2012201562 A AU2012201562 A AU 2012201562A AU 2012201562 A AU2012201562 A AU 2012201562A AU 2012201562 B2 AU2012201562 B2 AU 2012201562B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- cells
- composition
- rpe
- human
- rpe cells
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 title description 18
- 210000001525 retina Anatomy 0.000 title description 12
- 208000015122 neurodegenerative disease Diseases 0.000 title description 3
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 473
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 201000007737 Retinal degeneration Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000004258 retinal degeneration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 41
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 claims description 39
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 35
- 102000007354 PAX6 Transcription Factor Human genes 0.000 claims description 26
- 101150081664 PAX6 gene Proteins 0.000 claims description 24
- 102100035846 Pigment epithelium-derived factor Human genes 0.000 claims description 23
- 101000670189 Homo sapiens Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase Proteins 0.000 claims description 22
- 108090000102 pigment epithelium-derived factor Proteins 0.000 claims description 21
- 208000002780 macular degeneration Diseases 0.000 claims description 20
- 108050002823 Bestrophin Proteins 0.000 claims description 18
- 102000012304 Bestrophin Human genes 0.000 claims description 18
- 102100028001 Retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 Human genes 0.000 claims description 18
- 208000007014 Retinitis pigmentosa Diseases 0.000 claims description 16
- 101000729271 Homo sapiens Retinoid isomerohydrolase Proteins 0.000 claims description 15
- 102100031176 Retinoid isomerohydrolase Human genes 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 108010037362 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims description 12
- 102000010834 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Human genes 0.000 claims description 12
- 208000017442 Retinal disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 11
- 210000002744 extracellular matrix Anatomy 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 108010010803 Gelatin Proteins 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000008273 gelatin Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 claims description 9
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 claims description 9
- 235000011852 gelatine desserts Nutrition 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000007850 degeneration Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 5
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 108010085895 Laminin Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 102000007547 Laminin Human genes 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000001058 brown pigment Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 102000002260 Alkaline Phosphatase Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108020004774 Alkaline Phosphatase Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010067306 Fibronectins Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000016359 Fibronectins Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000035719 Maculopathy Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 206010038923 Retinopathy Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 201000007790 vitelliform macular dystrophy Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000036443 AIPL1-related retinopathy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000005598 Angioid Streaks Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000016615 Central areolar choroidal dystrophy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000033825 Chorioretinal atrophy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 201000001353 Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000037312 Familial drusen Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000036893 GUCY2D-related dominant retinopathy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000034461 Progressive cone dystrophy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000027073 Stargardt disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 201000008615 cone dystrophy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 201000006754 cone-rod dystrophy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 201000006853 toxic maculopathy Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 101001078886 Homo sapiens Retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 208000004453 Retinal Dysplasia Diseases 0.000 claims 1
- 108060007030 Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010257 thawing Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 210000003583 retinal pigment epithelium Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 194
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 abstract description 12
- 210000001671 embryonic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 11
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 11
- 210000001164 retinal progenitor cell Anatomy 0.000 abstract 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 43
- 210000002242 embryoid body Anatomy 0.000 description 40
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 37
- 108091008695 photoreceptors Proteins 0.000 description 27
- 230000001537 neural effect Effects 0.000 description 25
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 24
- 235000020945 retinal Nutrition 0.000 description 21
- 239000011604 retinal Substances 0.000 description 20
- 230000002207 retinal effect Effects 0.000 description 20
- NCYCYZXNIZJOKI-UHFFFAOYSA-N vitamin A aldehyde Natural products O=CC=C(C)C=CC=C(C)C=CC1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C NCYCYZXNIZJOKI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 20
- 101710101931 Retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 101150087532 mitF gene Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 239000000049 pigment Substances 0.000 description 17
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 17
- 210000002569 neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 15
- 241000282472 Canis lupus familiaris Species 0.000 description 14
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 14
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 101000713575 Homo sapiens Tubulin beta-3 chain Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 102100036790 Tubulin beta-3 chain Human genes 0.000 description 13
- 230000004438 eyesight Effects 0.000 description 13
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 13
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 12
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 12
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 12
- 101100518992 Mus musculus Pax2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 11
- 206010064930 age-related macular degeneration Diseases 0.000 description 11
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 102100024785 Fibroblast growth factor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 10
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N all-trans-retinol Chemical compound OC\C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 210000001127 pigmented epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 102000029816 Collagenase Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 108060005980 Collagenase Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 108090000379 Fibroblast growth factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 229960002424 collagenase Drugs 0.000 description 9
- 108010058237 plasma protein fraction Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 229940002993 plasmanate Drugs 0.000 description 9
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 9
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 13-cis retinol Natural products OCC=C(C)C=CC=C(C)C=CC1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 8
- HJCMDXDYPOUFDY-WHFBIAKZSA-N Ala-Gln Chemical compound C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H](C(O)=O)CCC(N)=O HJCMDXDYPOUFDY-WHFBIAKZSA-N 0.000 description 7
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 7
- 208000018737 Parkinson disease Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 7
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000004115 adherent culture Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 7
- 210000000981 epithelium Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000003753 real-time PCR Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000003757 reverse transcription PCR Methods 0.000 description 7
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 201000004569 Blindness Diseases 0.000 description 6
- -1 RPE-65 Proteins 0.000 description 6
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-BOOMUCAASA-N Vitamin A Natural products OC/C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(\C)/C=C/C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-BOOMUCAASA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 6
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 210000001109 blastomere Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 108010007093 dispase Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 210000002919 epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 210000005157 neural retina Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 6
- 235000019155 vitamin A Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 239000011719 vitamin A Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229940045997 vitamin a Drugs 0.000 description 6
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 5
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 206010029113 Neovascularisation Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 102000008730 Nestin Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108010088225 Nestin Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 206010057249 Phagocytosis Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229940088598 enzyme Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 5
- 210000005055 nestin Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000008782 phagocytosis Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 5
- DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N β‐Mercaptoethanol Chemical compound OCCS DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101100351026 Drosophila melanogaster ey gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 206010058314 Dysplasia Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 241000282326 Felis catus Species 0.000 description 4
- 101000942967 Homo sapiens Leukemia inhibitory factor Proteins 0.000 description 4
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229930040373 Paraformaldehyde Natural products 0.000 description 4
- 239000006180 TBST buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 210000000411 amacrine cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000002459 blastocyst Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000013592 cell lysate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 210000003169 central nervous system Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000032459 dedifferentiation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000011223 gene expression profiling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 4
- 102000046645 human LIF Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013532 laser treatment Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 4
- 210000003061 neural cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000005155 neural progenitor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 229920002866 paraformaldehyde Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 210000000608 photoreceptor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000001316 polygonal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000001082 somatic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 210000001585 trabecular meshwork Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000002103 transcriptional effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 206010003694 Atrophy Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 241000282693 Cercopithecidae Species 0.000 description 3
- 208000003098 Ganglion Cysts Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 206010025421 Macule Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 102100035423 POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 101710126211 POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108090000820 Rhodopsin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 208000005400 Synovial Cyst Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 206010043276 Teratoma Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 206010052779 Transplant rejections Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 229940121369 angiogenesis inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000004037 angiogenesis inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000037444 atrophy Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000001775 bruch membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000002659 cell therapy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004373 eye development Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012091 fetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000003754 fetus Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 3
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N glutamine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000012744 immunostaining Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000002510 keratinocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000002752 melanocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 210000000472 morula Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000000287 oocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000000137 peptide hydrolase inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000006884 regulation of angiogenesis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 108091006106 transcriptional activators Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 230000029663 wound healing Effects 0.000 description 3
- NCYCYZXNIZJOKI-IOUUIBBYSA-N 11-cis-retinal Chemical compound O=C/C=C(\C)/C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C NCYCYZXNIZJOKI-IOUUIBBYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4',6-Diamino-2-phenylindol Chemical compound C1=CC(C(=N)N)=CC=C1C1=CC2=CC=C(C(N)=N)C=C2N1 FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-RRKCRQDMSA-N 5-bromodeoxyuridine Chemical compound C1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C(Br)=C1 WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-RRKCRQDMSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000008157 ELISA kit Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010014970 Ephelides Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241000283074 Equus asinus Species 0.000 description 2
- 108700039887 Essential Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 208000010412 Glaucoma Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 2
- 101001073422 Homo sapiens Pigment epithelium-derived factor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100023967 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 12 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010065086 Keratin-12 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- XUMBMVFBXHLACL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Melanin Chemical compound O=C1C(=O)C(C2=CNC3=C(C(C(=O)C4=C32)=O)C)=C2C4=CNC2=C1C XUMBMVFBXHLACL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 208000003351 Melanosis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102000018697 Membrane Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010052285 Membrane Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000012901 Milli-Q water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 101100350582 Mus musculus Otx2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000000020 Nitrocellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 101710131036 Opsin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100032646 Opsin-5 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710131039 Opsin-5 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 2
- 108010032788 PAX6 Transcription Factor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000012807 PCR reagent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 102000003992 Peroxidases Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102100040826 Photoreceptor disk component PRCD Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710089989 Photoreceptor disk component PRCD Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 208000012641 Pigmentation disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229920001213 Polysorbate 20 Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 241000288906 Primates Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000002158 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229940124158 Protease/peptidase inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 102000018210 Recoverin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010076570 Recoverin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 206010038933 Retinopathy of prematurity Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010038934 Retinopathy proliferative Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102100040756 Rhodopsin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000011579 SCID mouse model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108010017842 Telomerase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002583 angiography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940088710 antibiotic agent Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003542 behavioural effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229960000074 biopharmaceutical Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000006727 cell loss Effects 0.000 description 2
- YRQNKMKHABXEJZ-UVQQGXFZSA-N chembl176323 Chemical compound C1C[C@]2(C)[C@@]3(C)CC(N=C4C[C@]5(C)CCC6[C@]7(C)CC[C@@H]([C@]7(CC[C@]6(C)[C@@]5(C)CC4=N4)C)CCCCCCCC)=C4C[C@]3(C)CCC2[C@]2(C)CC[C@H](CCCCCCCC)[C@]21C YRQNKMKHABXEJZ-UVQQGXFZSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008045 co-localization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004087 cornea Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007418 data mining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003412 degenerative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010494 dissociation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005593 dissociations Effects 0.000 description 2
- VYFYYTLLBUKUHU-UHFFFAOYSA-N dopamine Chemical compound NCCC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 VYFYYTLLBUKUHU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004064 dysfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001493 electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002308 embryonic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000003797 essential amino acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000020776 essential amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- DNJIEGIFACGWOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethyl mercaptane Natural products CCS DNJIEGIFACGWOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000013861 fat-free Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000001943 fluorescence-activated cell sorting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001654 germ layer Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011544 gradient gel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010562 histological examination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000005260 human cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000003834 intracellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011813 knockout mouse model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108010082117 matrigel Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000008099 melanin synthesis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000386 microscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 208000021971 neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229920001220 nitrocellulos Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108040007629 peroxidase activity proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000019612 pigmentation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000010486 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000256 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006785 proliferative vitreoretinopathy Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001172 regenerating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003362 replicative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229960003471 retinol Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 235000020944 retinol Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000011607 retinol Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- DAEPDZWVDSPTHF-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium pyruvate Chemical compound [Na+].CC(=O)C([O-])=O DAEPDZWVDSPTHF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000002269 spontaneous effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003863 superior colliculi Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000001578 tight junction Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000005166 vasculature Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000004393 visual impairment Effects 0.000 description 2
- DPUJVBNLRHXFMP-JEDNCBNOSA-N (2s)-2,6-diaminohexanoic acid;periodic acid Chemical compound OI(=O)(=O)=O.NCCCC[C@H](N)C(O)=O DPUJVBNLRHXFMP-JEDNCBNOSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PQVHMOLNSYFXIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-[2-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-ylamino)pyrimidin-5-yl]-1-[2-oxo-2-(2,4,6,7-tetrahydrotriazolo[4,5-c]pyridin-5-yl)ethyl]pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid Chemical compound C1C(CC2=CC=CC=C12)NC1=NC=C(C=N1)C=1C(=NN(C=1)CC(N1CC2=C(CC1)NN=N2)=O)C(=O)O PQVHMOLNSYFXIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010002091 Anaesthesia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000002237 B-cell of pancreatic islet Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 101150061927 BMP2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000037663 Best vitelliform macular dystrophy Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100022794 Bestrophin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bicarbonate Chemical compound OC([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- BTBUEUYNUDRHOZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Borate Chemical compound [O-]B([O-])[O-] BTBUEUYNUDRHOZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100161935 Caenorhabditis elegans act-4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000252229 Carassius auratus Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000014914 Carrier Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 206010008790 Choroidal rupture Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010022452 Collagen Type I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000012422 Collagen Type I Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 206010048843 Cytomegalovirus chorioretinitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010012689 Diabetic retinopathy Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000012286 ELISA Assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glutaraldehyde Chemical compound O=CCCCC=O SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000288105 Grus Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000007995 HEPES buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000506680 Haemulon melanurum Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000032843 Hemorrhage Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000002563 Histoplasmosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101000903449 Homo sapiens Bestrophin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001052035 Homo sapiens Fibroblast growth factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000835745 Homo sapiens Teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 206010062016 Immunosuppression Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- YQEZLKZALYSWHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ketamine Chemical compound C=1C=CC=C(Cl)C=1C1(NC)CCCCC1=O YQEZLKZALYSWHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WTDRDQBEARUVNC-LURJTMIESA-N L-DOPA Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 WTDRDQBEARUVNC-LURJTMIESA-N 0.000 description 1
- WTDRDQBEARUVNC-UHFFFAOYSA-N L-Dopa Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 WTDRDQBEARUVNC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 201000003533 Leber congenital amaurosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000282553 Macaca Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000282560 Macaca mulatta Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000001344 Macular Edema Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010025415 Macular oedema Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101500028890 Mus musculus Neurotensin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010073286 Pathologic myopia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000035195 Peptidases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091005804 Peptidases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- GOOHAUXETOMSMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propylene oxide Chemical compound CC1CO1 GOOHAUXETOMSMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004365 Protease Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010240 RT-PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 101100247004 Rattus norvegicus Qsox1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700005075 Regulator Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010038848 Retinal detachment Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000014139 Retinal vascular disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- NCYCYZXNIZJOKI-OVSJKPMPSA-N Retinaldehyde Chemical compound O=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C NCYCYZXNIZJOKI-OVSJKPMPSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 102100026404 Teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 201000005485 Toxoplasmosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000004887 Transforming Growth Factor beta Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090001012 Transforming Growth Factor beta Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010045178 Tunnel vision Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000013521 Visual disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- ZHAFUINZIZIXFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N [9-(dimethylamino)-10-methylbenzo[a]phenoxazin-5-ylidene]azanium;chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].O1C2=CC(=[NH2+])C3=CC=CC=C3C2=NC2=C1C=C(N(C)C)C(C)=C2 ZHAFUINZIZIXFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001594 aberrant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012190 activator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000001789 adipocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000735 allogeneic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000037005 anaesthesia Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000964 angiostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004102 animal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000006907 apoptotic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011888 autopsy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003376 axonal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009227 behaviour therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108091008324 binding proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004703 blastocyst inner cell mass Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004204 blood vessel Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 101150067309 bmp4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000036760 body temperature Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000424 bronchial epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000007978 cacodylate buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000004413 cardiac myocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000006143 cell culture medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007248 cellular mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003837 chick embryo Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003161 choroid Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037416 cystogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000001763 cytomegalovirus retinitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940042399 direct acting antivirals protease inhibitors Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960003638 dopamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003981 ectoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001900 endoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003038 endothelium Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000005081 epithelial layer Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035558 fertility Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001061 forehead Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001415 gene therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003958 hematopoietic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002287 horizontal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010166 immunofluorescence Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001506 immunosuppresive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000001153 interneuron Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004153 islets of langerhan Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960003299 ketamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000005229 liver cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000018769 loss of vision Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 231100000864 loss of vision Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000006166 lysate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000010230 macular retinal edema Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010311 mammalian development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008774 maternal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003716 mesoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000002493 microarray Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000110 microvilli Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000663 muscle cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000001178 neural stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004498 neuroglial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002981 neuropathic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100001223 noncarcinogenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000489 osmium tetroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000012285 osmium tetroxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000963 osteoblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008186 parthenogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001776 parthenogenetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002135 phase contrast microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000649 photocoagulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- OXNIZHLAWKMVMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N picric acid Chemical compound OC1=C([N+]([O-])=O)C=C([N+]([O-])=O)C=C1[N+]([O-])=O OXNIZHLAWKMVMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001778 pluripotent stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002980 postoperative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001747 pupil Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003716 rejuvenation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000008458 response to injury Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004264 retinal detachment Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004491 retinal development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000790 retinal pigment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000010581 retinitis pigmentosa 25 Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 150000004492 retinoid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940054269 sodium pyruvate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000007920 subcutaneous administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000946 synaptic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZRKFYGHZFMAOKI-QMGMOQQFSA-N tgfbeta Chemical compound C([C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCSC)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(O)=O)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 ZRKFYGHZFMAOKI-QMGMOQQFSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000017423 tissue regeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229950003937 tolonium Drugs 0.000 description 1
- HNONEKILPDHFOL-UHFFFAOYSA-M tolonium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].C1=C(C)C(N)=CC2=[S+]C3=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C3N=C21 HNONEKILPDHFOL-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 210000003014 totipotent stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007306 turnover Effects 0.000 description 1
- JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N urethane group Chemical group NC(=O)OCC JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000029257 vision disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000004382 visual function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 101150051888 vsx2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- BPICBUSOMSTKRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N xylazine Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC(C)=C1NC1=NCCCS1 BPICBUSOMSTKRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001600 xylazine Drugs 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
This invention relates to methods for improved cell-based therapies for retinal degeneration and for differentiating human embryonic stem cells and human embryo-derived into retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells and other retinal progenitor cells.
Description
AUSTRALIA PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT ORIGINAL Name of Applicant: Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. Actual Inventors: Irina Klimanskaya and Robert Lanza Address for Service is: SHELSTON IP 60 Margaret Street Telephone No: (02) 9777 1111 SYDNEY NSW 2000 Facsimile No. (02) 9241 4666 CCN: 3710000352 Attorney Code: SW Invention Title: Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina Details of Original Application No. 2005325753 dated 20 Jul 2005 The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us: File: 55328AUP01 - 1a Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina The present application is a divisional application of Australian Application No. 2005325753, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. FIELD OF THE INVENTION 5 This invention relates generally to methods for improved cell-based therapies for retinal degeneration and other visual disorders as well as treatment of Parkinson's disease and for differentiating mammalian embryonic stem cells and mammalian embryo-derived cells into retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells and other eye tissue including, but not limited to, rods, cones, bipolar, corneal, neural, iris epithelium, and progenitor cells. 0 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Any discussion of the prior art throughout the specification should in no way be considered as an admission that such prior art is widely known or forms part of common general knowledge in the field. Many parts of the central nervous system (CNS) exhibit laminar organization, and 5 neuropathological processes generally involve more than one of these multiple cellular layers. Diseases of the CNS frequently include neuronal cell loss, and, because of the absence of endogenous repopulation, effective recovery of function following CNS-related disease is either extremely limited or absent. In particular, the common retinal condition known as age related macular degeneration (AMD) results from the loss of photoreceptors together with the 20 retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), with additional variable involvement of internuncial ("relay") neurons of the inner nuclear layer (INL). Restoration of moderate-to-high acuity vision, therefore, requires the functional replacement of some or all of the damaged cellular layers. Anatomically, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a family of inherited retinal degenerations, is a continuing decrease in the number of photoreceptor cells which leads to loss of vision. 25 Although the phenotype is similar across most forms of RP, the underlying cellular mechanisms are diverse and can result from various mutations in many genes. Most involve mutations that alter the expression of photoreceptor-cell-specific genes, with mutations in the rhodopsin gene accounting for approximately 10% of these. In other forms of the disease, the regulatory genes of apoptosis are altered (for example, Bax and Pax2). AMD is a clinical 30 diagnosis encompassing a range of degenerative conditions that likely differ in etiology at the molecular level. All cases of AMD share the feature of photoreceptor cell loss within the central retina. However, this common endpoint appears to be a secondary consequence of earlier abnormalities at the level of the RPE, neovascularization, and underlying Bruch's membrane. The latter may relate to difficulties with photoreceptor membrane turnover, which are as yet poorly understood. Additionally, the retinal 5 pigment epithelium is one of the most important cell types in the eye, as it is crucial to the support of the photoreceptor function. It performs several complex tasks, including phagocytosis of shed outer segments of rods and cones, vitamin A metabolism, synthesis of mucoploysacharides involved in the metabolite exchange in the subretinal space, transport of metabolites, regulation of angiogenesis, absorption 10 of light, enhancement of resolution of images, and the regulation of many other functions in the retina through secreted proteins such as proteases and protease inhibitors. An additional feature present in some cases of AMD is the presence of aberrant blood vessels, which result in a condition known as choroidal 15 neovascularization (CNV). This neovascular ("wet") form of AMD is particularly destructive and seems to result from a loss of proper regulation of angiogenesis. Breaks in Bruch's membrane as a result of RPE dysfunction allows new vessels from the choroidal circulation access to the subretinal space, where they can physically disrupt outer-segment organization and cause vascular leakage or hemorrhage leading 20 to additional photoreceptor loss. CNV can be targeted by laser treatment. Thus, laser treatment for the "wet" form of AMD is in general use in the United States. There are often undesirable side effects, however, and therefore patient dissatisfaction with treatment outcome. This is due to the fact that laser burns, if they occur, are associated with photoreceptor death 25 and with absolute, irreparable blindness within the corresponding part of the visual field. In addition, laser treatment does not fix the underlying predisposition towards developing CNV. Indeed, laser burns have been used as a convenient method for induction of CNV in monkeys (Archer and Gardiner,, 1981). Macular laser treatments for CNV are used much more sparingly in other countries such as the U.K. 30 There is no generally recognized treatment for the more common "dry" form of AMD, in which there is photoreceptor loss overlying irregular patches of RPE atrophy in the macula and associated extracellular material called drusen. Since RPE plays an important role in photoreceptor maintenance, and regulation of angiogenesis, various RPE malfunctions in vivo are associated with 2 vision-altering ailments, such as retinitis pigmentosa, RPE detachment, displasia, atrophy, retinopathy, macular dystrophy or degeneration, including age-related macular degeneration, which can result in photoreceptor damage and blindness. Specifically and in addition to AMD, the variety of other degenerative conditions 5 affecting the macula include, but are not limited to, cone dystrophy, cone-rod dystrophy, malattia leventinese, Doyne honeycomb dystrophy, Sorsby's dystrophy, Stargardt disease, pattern/butterfly dystrophies, Best vitelliform dystrophy, North Carolina dystrophy, central areolar choroidal dystrophy, angioid streaks, and toxic maculopathies. 10 General retinal diseases that can secondarily affect the macula include retinal detaclunent, pathologic myopia, retinitis pigmentosa, diabetic retinopathy, CMV retinitis, occlusive retinal vascular disease, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), choroidal rupture, ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS), toxoplasmosis, and Leber's congenital amaurosis. None of the above lists is exhaustive. 15 All of the above conditions involve loss of photoreceptors and, therefore, treatment options are few and insufficient. Because of its wound healing abilities, RPE has been extensively studied in application to transplantation therapy. In 2002, one year into the trial, patients were showing a 30-50% improvement. It has been shown in several animal models and in 20 humans (Gouras et al., 2002, Stanga et al., 2002, Binder et al., 2002, Schraermeyer et al., 2001, reviewed by Lund et al., 2001) that RPE transplantation has a good potential of vision restoration. However, even in an immune-privileged site such as the eye, there is a problem with graft rejection, hindering the progress of this approach if allogenic transplantation is used. Although new photoreceptors (PRCs) have been 25 introduced experimentally by transplantation, grafted PRCs show a marked reluctance to link up with surviving neurons of the host retina. Reliance on RPE cells derived from fetal tissue is another problem, as these cells have shown a very low proliferative potential. Emory University researchers performed a trial where they cultured RPE cells from a human eye donor in vitro and transplanted them into six 30 patients with advanced Parkinson's Disease. Although a 30-50% decrease in symptoms was found one year after transplantation, there is a shortage of eye donors, this is not yet FDA approved, and there would still exist a need beyond what could be met by donated eye tissue. 3 -4 Thus far, therapies using ectopic RPE cells have been shown to behave like fibroblasts and have been associated with a number of destructive retinal complications including axonal loss (Villegas-Perez, et al, 1998) and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) with retinal detachment (Cleary and Ryan, 1979). RPE delivered as a loose sheet 5 tends to scroll up. This results in poor effective coverage of photoreceptors as well as a multilayered RPE with incorrect polarity, possibly resulting in cyst formation or macular edema. Delivery of neural retinal grafts to the subretinal (submacular) space of the diseased human eye has been described in Kaplan et al. (1997), Humayun et al. (2000), 10 and del Cerro et al. (2000). A serious problem exists in that the neural retinal grafts typically do not functionally integrate with the host retina. In addition, the absence of an intact RPE monolayer means that RPE dysfunction or disruption of Bruch's membrane has not been rectified. Both are fundamental antecedents of visual loss. Thus, there exists no effective means for reconstituting RPE in any of the current 15 therapies and there remain deficiencies in each, particularly the essential problem of a functional disconnection between the graft and the host retina. Therefore there exists the need for an improved retinal therapy. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 20 According to a first aspect, the present invention provides a composition comprising isolated human RPE cells obtained by in vitro differentiation of human pluripotent cells that express Oct-4, alkaline phosphatase, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-I-60, and TRA-I-8 1. 25 According to a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating an individual in need thereof comprising transplanting or injecting into the eye of said individual a composition of the first aspect. According to a third aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating or preventing a retinal disease or condition, comprising transplanting or injecting a 30 composition of the first aspect into a human patient in need thereof. According to a fourth aspect, the present invention provides use of a composition of the first aspect for the manufacture of a medicament for treating or preventing a - 4a retinal disease or condition, wherein the medicament is adapted for transplantation or injection. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words "comprise", "comprising", and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as 5 opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of "including, but not limited to". The purpose of the present invention is to provide improved methods for the derivation of eye cells including, but not limited to, neural cells, including horizontal cells and amacrine cells, retinal cells such as rods and cones, comeal cells, vascular 10 cells, and RPE and RPE-like cells from stem cells and to provide improved methods and therapies for the treatment of retinal degeneration. In particular, these methods involve the use of RPE and RPE-like cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. One embodiment of the present invention provides an improved method of generating cells for therapy for retinal degeneration using RPE cells, RPE-like cells, the progenitors 15 of these cells or a combination of two or three of any of the preceding derived from mammalian embryonic stem cells in order to treat various conditions including but not limited to retinitis pigmentosa and macular degeneration and associated conditions. The cell types which can be produced using this invention include, but are not limited to, RPE, RPE-like cells, and RPE progenitors. Cells which may also be produced include iris pigmented epithelial (IPE) cells. Vision associated neural cells including intemuncial neurons (e.g. "relay" neurons of the inner nuclear layer (INL)) and amacrine cells (interneurons that interact at the second synaptic level of the vertically direct pathways consisting of the photoreceptor 5 bipolar-ganglion cell chain - they are synaptically active in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and serve to integrate, modulate and interpose a temporal domain to the visual message presented to the ganglion cell) can also be produced using this invention. Additionally, retinal cells, rods, cones, and corneal cells can be produced. In a further embodiment of the present invention, cells providing the vasculature of the eye can 10 also be produced. The cells of the present invention may be transplanted into the subretinal space by using vitrectomy surgery. Non-limiting examples include the transplantation of these cells in a suspension, matrix, or substrate. Animal models of retinitis pigmentosa that may be treated include rodents (rd mouse, RPE-65 knockout mouse, tubby-like mouse, RCS rat, cats (Abyssinian cat), and dogs (cone 15 degeneration "cd" dog, progressive rod-cone degeneration "prcd" dog, early retinal degeneration "erd" dog, rod-cone dysplasia 1, 2 & 3 "redl, rcd2 & rcd3" dogs, photoreceptor dysplasia "pd" dog, and Briard "RPE-65" (dog). Evaluation is performed using behavioral tests, fluorescent angiography, histology, or functional testing such as measuring the ability of the cells to perform phagocytosis 20 (photoreceptor fragments), vitamin A metabolism, tight junctions conductivity, or evaluation using electron microscopy. One of the many advantages to the methods presented here is the ability to produce and treat many more patients than it would be possible to treat if one were limited to using eye donor tissue. A further embodiment of the present invention provides methods for the 25 spontaneous differentiation of hES cells into cells with numerous characteristics of RPE. These RPE preparations are capable of phenotypic changes in culture and maintaining RPE characteristics through multiple passages. The present invention also provides for methods of differentiation of established RPE cell lines into alternate neuronal lineages, corneal cells, retinal cells as a non-limiting example through the 30 use of bFGF or FGF. Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for the derivation of new RPE lines and progenitor cells from existing and new ES cell lines. There can be variations in the properties, such as growth rate, expression of pigment, or de differentiation and re-differentiation in culture, of RPE-like cells when they are 5 derived from different ES cell lines. There can be certain variations in their functionality and karyotypic stability, so it is desirable to provide methods for the derivation of new RPE lines and new ES cell lines which would allow choosing the lines with desired properties that can be clonally selected to produce a pure population 5 of high quality RPE-like cells. In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides an isolated RPE or RPE-like cell line which varies from established RPE cell lines in at least one of the characteristics selected from the group consisting of: growth rate, expression of pigment, de-differentiation in culture, and re-differentiation in culture. 10 Cells which may also be derived from existing and new ES cell lines include iris pigmented epithelial (IPE) cells. In an additional embodiment, vision associated neural cells including internuncial neurons (e.g. "relay" neurons of the inner nuclear layer (INL)) and amacrine cells can also be produced using this invention. Additionally, retinal cells, rods, cones, and corneal cells can be produced. In a further 15 embodiment of the present invention, cells providing the vasculature of the eye can also be produced. Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for the derivation of RPE lines or precursors to RPE cells that have an increased ability to prevent neovascularization. Such cells can be produced by aging a somatic cell from a patient 20 such that telomerase is shortened where at least 10% of the normal replicative lifespan of the cell has been passed, then the use of said somatic cell as a nuclear transfer donor cell to create cells that overexpress angiogenesis inhibitors such as Pigment Epithelium Derived Factor (PEDF/EPC-1). Alternatively such cells may be genetically modified with exogenous genes that inhibit neovascularization. 25 Another embodiment of the present invention utilized a bank of ES or embryo derived cells with homozygosity in the HLA region such that said cells have reduced complexity of their HLA antigens. Therefore, an additional embodiment of the present invention includes the characterization of ES-derived RPE-like cells. Although the ES-derived pigmented 30 epithelial cells strongly resemble RPE by their morphology, behavior and molecular markers, their therapeutic value will depend on their ability to perform RPE functions and to remain non-carcinogenic. Therefore, the ES-derived RPE cells are characterized using one or more of the following techniques: (i) assessment of their functionality, i.e. phagocytosis of the photoreceptor fragments, vitamin A metabolism, 6 wound healing potential; (ii) evaluation of the pluripotency of RPE-like ES cells derivatives through animal model transplantations, (as a non-limiting example this can include SCID mice); (iii) phenoytping and karyotyping of RPE-like cells; (iv) evaluation of ES cells-derived RPE-like cells and RPE tissue by gene expression 5 profiling, (v) evaluation of the expression of molecular markers of RPE at the protein level, including bestrophin, CRALBP, RPE-65, PEDF, and the absence of ES markers, and (vi) evaluation of the ratio of RPE and neural markers. The cells can also be evaluated based on their expression of transcriptional activators normally required for the eye development, including rx/rax, chx10/vsx-2/alx, ots-1, otx-2, 10 six3/optx, six6/optx2, mitf, pax6/mitf, and pax6/pax2 (Fischer and Reh, 2001, Baumer et al., 2003). An additional embodiment of the present invention is a method for the characterization of ES-derived RPE-like cells using at least one of the techniques selected from the group consisting of (i) assessment of the ES-derived RPE-like cells 15 functionality; (ii) evaluation of the pluripotency of RPE-like ES cell derivatives through animal model transplantations; (iii) phenoytping and karyotyping of RPE-like cells; (iv) evaluation of gene expression profiling, (v) evaluation of the expression of molecular markers of RPE at the protein level; and (vi) the expression of transcriptional activators normally required for the eye development. In a further 20 embodiment these techniques may be used for the assessment of multiple hES cell derived cell types. Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for the derivation of RPE cells and RPE precursor cells directly from human and non-human animal morula or blastocyst-staged embryos (EDCs) without the generation of ES cell lines. 25 Embryonic stem cells (ES) can be indefinitely maintained in vitro in an undifferentiated state and yet are capable of differentiating into virtually any cell type. Thus human embryonic stem (hES) cells are useful for studies on the differentiation of human cells and can be considered as a potential source for transplantation therapies. To date, the differentiation of human and mouse ES cells into numerous 30 cell types have been reported (reviewed by Smith, 2001) including cardiomyocytes [Kehat et al. 2001, Mummery et al., 2003 Carpenter et al., 2002], neurons and neural precursors (Reubinoff et al. 2000, Carpenter et al. 2001, Schuldiner et al., 2001), adipocytes (Bost et al., 2002, Aubert et al., 1999), hepatocyte-like cells (Rambhatla et al., 2003), hematopoetic cells (Chadwick et al., 2003). oocytes (Hubner et all., 2003), 7 thymocyte-like cells (Lin RY et al., 2003), pancreatic islet cells (Kahan, 2003), and osteoblasts (Zur Nieden et al., 2003). Another embodiment of the present invention is a method of identifying cells such as RPE cells, hematopoietic cells, muscle cells, liver cells, pancreatic beta cells, neurons, endothelium, progenitor cells or other cells 5 useful in cell therapy or research, derived from embryos, embryonic stem cell lines, or other embryonic cells with the capacity to differentiate into useful cell types by comparing the messenger RNA transcripts of such cells with cells derived in-vivo. This method facilitates the identification of cells with a normal phenotype and for deriving cells optimized for cell therapy for research. 10 The present invention provides for the differentiation of human ES cells into a specialized cell in the neuronal lineage, the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). RPE is a densely pigmented epithelial monolayer between the choroid and neural retina. It serves as a part of a barrier between the bloodstream and retina, and it's functions include phagocytosis of shed rod and cone outer segments, absorption of stray light, 15 vitamin A metabolism, regeneration of retinoids, and tissue repair. (Grierson et al., 1994, Fisher and Reh, 2001, Marmorstein et al., 1998). The RPE is easily recognized by its cobblestone cellular morphology of black pigmented cells. In addition, there are several known markers of the RPE, including cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), a cytoplasmic protein that is also found in apical microvilli (Bunt 20 Milam and Saari, 1983); RPE65, a cytoplasmic protein involved in retinoid metabolism (Ma et al., 2001, Redmond et al., 1998); bestrophin, the product of the Best vitelliform macular dystrophy gene (VMD2, Marmorstein et al., 2000), and pigment epithelium derived factor (PEDF) a 48kD secreted protein with angiostatic properties (Karakousis et al., 2001, Jablonski et al., 2000). 25 An unusual feature of the RPE is its apparent plasticity. RPE cells are normally mitotically quiescent, but can begin to divide in response to injury or photocoagulation. RPE cells adjacent to the injury flatten and proliferate forming a new monolayer (Zhao et al, 1997). Several studies have indicated that the RPE monolayer can produce cells of fibroblast appearance that can later revert to their 30 original RPE morphology (Grierson et al., 1994, Kirchhof et al., 1988, Lee et al., 2001). It is unclear whether the dividing cells and pigmented epithelial layer are from the same lineage as two populations of RPE cells have been isolated: epithelial and fusiforms. (McKay and Burke, 1994). In vitro, depending on the combination of growth factors and substratum, RPE can be maintained as an epithelium or rapidly 8 dedifferentiate and become proliferative (Zhao 1997, Opas and Dziak, 1994). Interestingly, the epithelial phenotype can be reestablished in long-term quiescent cultures (Griersion et al., 1994). In mammalian development RPE shares the same progenitor with neural 5 retina, the neuroepithelium of the optic vesicle. Under certain conditions, it has been suggested that RPE can transdifferentiate into neuronal progenitors (Opas and Dziak, 1994), neurons (Chen et al., 2003, Vinores et al., 1995), and lens epithelium (Eguchi, 1986). One of the factors which can stimulate the change of RPE into neurons is bFGF (Opaz and Dziak, 1994, a process associated with the expression of 10 transcriptional activators normally required for the eye development, including rx/rax, chxl0/vsx-2/alx, ots-1, otx-2, six3/optx, six6/optx2, mitf, and pax6/pax2 (Fischer and Reh, 2001, Baumer et al., 2003). Recently, it has been shown that the margins of the chick retina contain neural stem cells (Fischer and Reh, 2000) and that the pigmented cells in that area, which express pax6/mitf, can form neuronal cells in response to 15 FGF (Fisher and Reh, 2001). The present invention provides for the derivation of trabecular meshwork cells from hES and also for genetically modified trabecular meshwork cells for the treatment of glaucoma. The present invention also provides for the derivation of trabecular meshwork 20 cells from RPE progenitors and RPE-like cells and also for genetically modified trabecular meshwork cells for the treatment of glaucoma. In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method for isolating RPE-like cells. Such a method may comprise: a) culturing hES cells in medium that supports proliferation and transdifferentiation of hES cells to RPE-like cells; b) 25 selecting the cells of step a) that exhibit the signs of differentiation along the neural lineage; c) passaging the cells selected in step b) using an enzyme, such as a or a combination of collagenase(s) and/or a dissociation buffer (non-limiting examples of these include trypsin, collagenase IV, collagenase I, dispase, EDTA, or other commercially available dissociation buffers) until pigmented epithelial islands appear 30 or multiply in number; and d) selecting pigmented or non-pigmented cells passaged in step c) for establishment of high purity RPE-like cultures. In certain aspects, the hES cells of the invention may be cultured in any medium that supports proliferation and transdifferentiation. In other aspects, the hES cells are cultured in medium that contains Serum Replacement. In a specific aspect, the hES cells of the invention may 9 be cutured in medium that includes knockout high glucose DMEM supplemented with 500 u/ml Penicillin, 500 pg/ml streptomycin, 1 % non-essential amino acids solution, 2 mM GlutaMAX I, 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 4-80 ng/ml bFGF, and 8.4%-20% Serum Replacement. Optionally, the hES cells of the present invention are cultured in 5 medium that further comprises 10-100 ng/ml human LIF. Optionally, the hES culture medium of the invention further comprises Plasmanate. Plasmanate may be added to a final concentration of about 1% to about 25% (e.g., about 1%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 12%, 16% or 20%). In another aspect, the hES cells of the invention may be passaged repeatedly, including 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 or more times. Differentiating cells may be 10 selected due to their expression of neural-lineage specific markers. Exemplary neural-lineage specific markers include and Pax6. In a preferred embodiment bFGF is added to the RPE cultures during proliferation and the cells are cultured without bFGF during differentiation. The present invention includes methods for the derivation of RPE cells and 15 RPE precursor cells directly from human and non-human animal morula or blastocyst-staged embryos (EDCs) without the generation of ES cell lines. In one embodiment, such a method comprises the steps of: a) maintaining ES cells in vitro in an undifferentiated state; b) differentiating the ES cells into RPE and RPE precursor cells; c) identifying the RPE cells by comparing the messenger RNA 20 transcripts of such cells with cells derived in-vivo and/or identifying the RPE cells by comparing the protein expression profile with known RPE cells and/or phenotypic assessment; and e) identifying and/or isolating RPE cells and/or RPE precursors. Further provided by the present invention are methods for the derivation of RPE lines or precursors to RPE cells that have an increased ability to prevent 25 neovascularization, said methods comprising: a) aging a somatic cell from an animal such that telomerase is shortened wherein at least 10% of the normal replicative lifespan of the cell has been passed; and, b) using the somatic cell as a nuclear transfer donor cell to create cells that overexpress angiogenesis inhibitors, wherein the angiogenesis inhibitors can be Pigment Epithelium Derived Factor (PEDF/EPC-1). 30 The present invention provides methods for the treatment of Parkinson's disease with hES cell-derived RPE, RPE-like and/or RPE progenitor cells. These may be delivered by stereotaxic intrastriatal implantation with or microcarriers. Alternately, they may be delivered without the use of microcarriers. The cells may 10 also be expanded in culture and used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease by any method known to those skilled in the art. Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description. 5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1A-F. is a series of photographs showing the appearance of pigmented areas (characteristic of RPE cells) in spontaneously differentiating hES cells. Figure 10 1 A is a photograph of pigmented regions in a 2.5 month old adherent culture, a well of a 4-well plate, scanned; Figure IB is a photograph of pigmented regions in a 2.5 month old cultures grown as EB, at 45x magnification; Figure IC is a photograph of a pigmented area of an adherent culture; Figure 1 D is a photograph of a pigmented region of an EB ; Figure 1 E is a photograph of the boundary between pigmented 15 region and the rest of the culture, x200; Figure F same as Figure E but at x400 magnification. Arrows in A and B point to pigmented regions. Figure 2A-F. is a series of photographs which show the loss and regain of pigmentation and epithelial morphology in culture. Figure 2A is a photograph showing primary EB outgrowth, 1 week; Figure 2B is a photograph showing the 20 primary culture of cells, hand-picked, 1 week; Figure 2C is a photograph showing epithelial islet surrounded by proliferating cells; Figure 2D is a photograph showing the regain of pigmentation and epithelial morphology in 1 month old culture; Figure 2E is a photograph showing the culture after 3 passages, x200 magnification; Figure 2F shows the same culture as in E, x400 magnification, Hoffman microscopy. Black 25 arrows point to pigmented cells, white arrows show outgrowing cells with no pigment. Figure 3 Left Panel (A-D) and Right Panel is a series of photographs and one graph - these show markers of RPE in hES cells-derived pigmented epithelial cells. Figures 3A and 3B are photographs showing immunolocalization of RPE 30 marker, bestrophin and corresponding phase microscopy field, x200 magnification; Figures 3C and 3D are photographs showing CRALBP and corresponding phase contrast microscopy field, x400 magnification. Arrows show the colocalization of bestrophin (A) and CRALBP (C) to pigmented cells (C, D); arrowheads point to the absence of staining for these proteins (A, B) in non-pigmented regions (C, D). 11 Figure 3, Right Panel (top) shows a photograph of Western blot of cell lysates with antibodies to bestrophin (a) and CRALBP (b); (c), (d) - undifferentiated hES cells , c--control to anti-CRALBP antibody, d-control to anti-bestrophin antibody 5 Figure 3, Right Panel (bottom) shows a comparison of RPE65 expression in mature and immature RPE-like cells by real-time RT-PCR. Sample numbers 1, 6 and 7 are mature seven-weeks old culture; sample numbers 2,3 4 and 5 are immature fifteen-days old cultures; and sample number 8 is undifferentiated hES cells. Figure 4 shows photographs which demonstrate the expression of markers of 10 Pax6 (Figure 4A), Pax2 (Figure 4E) and mitf (Figure 4B, Figure 4F) in RPE-like cells in long-term quiescent cultures. Figure 4C, Figure 4G - phase contrast, Figure 4D, Figure 4H - merged images of Pax6/mitf/phase contrast (Figure 4A, Figure 4B, Figure 4C) and Pax2/mitf/phase contrast (Figure 4E, Figure 4F, Figure 4G). Figure 5A-B show photographs of RPE differentiation in the culture of 15 human embryo-derived cells bypassing the stage of derivation of ES cell lines. Figure 6 shows the transcriptional comparison of RPE preparations. Figure 6A-F - Based on the Ontological annotation, this table represents the expression patterns of RPE related genes for hES cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium (hES RPE), hES cell derived transdifferentiated (hES-RPE-TD), ARPE-19 and D407, and 20 freshly isolated human RPE (fe-RPE). Figure 6G - Further data mining revealed known RPE specific ontologies, such as melanin biosynthesis, vision, retinol-binding, only in fetal RPE and ES-RPE but not ARPE-19. Figure 7 shows generation of neural progenitors from hES cells. A) Overgrown culture of hES cell, stereomicroscopy. B) Spheroids (arrow in A) were 25 removed and plated onto gelatin-coated plates in EB medium, producing spindle-like cells in 1-2 weeks. C) ,D) Staining of the cells shown in B) with antibodies to tubulin beta III (C) and nestin (D). Magnification: A), x60; B-D), x200. Figure 7 shows some neural progenitor cells generated from hES cells. Figure 8 shows morphology of different RPE cultures. A) Uniform 30 differentiated RPE. B) Some elongated non-pigmented cells (arrows). C) Pigmented islands surrounded by non-pigmented cells, the culture described as a candidate for hand-picking of the pigmented cells after collagenase and/or dispase digestion. D) Transdifferentiated cells. Magnification x200. Figure 8 shows the morphology of different RPE cultures. 12 Figure 9 is a series of photographs showing the appearance of rod and cone like structures in differtiating cultures of hES cells. Figure 9a is a histological examination of differentiating cultures, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, x200. Figure 9b-9e are RT-PCR analyses of Opsin 5 and Opsin 1 (9b), recoverin (9c), rhodopsin 5 (9d) and Keratin 12 (9e) in these cultures. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Various embodiments of the invention are described in detail and may be 10 further illustrated by the provided examples. As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of "a," "an," and "the" includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein, the meaning of"in" includes "in" and "on" unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. 15 Throughout this specification and claims, the word "comprise," or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising," will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers. The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in 20 the art, within the context of the invention, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the invention are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner in describing the compositions and methods of the invention and how to make and use them. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example 25 using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that the same thing can be said in more than one way. Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any 30 special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification, including examples of any terms discussed herein, is illustrative only, and in no way limits the scope and scope of the invention so long as data are 13 processed, sampled, converted, or the like according to the invention without regard for any particular theory or scheme of action. Definitions 5 By "embryo" or "embryonic" is meant a developing cell mass that has not implanted into the uterine membrane of a maternal host. An "embryonic cell" is a cell isolated from or contained in an embryo. This also includes blastomeres, obtained as early as the two-cell stage, and aggregated blastomeres. The term "embryonic stem cells" refers to embryo-derived cells. More 10 specifically it refers to cells isolated from the inner cell mass of blastocysts or morulae and that have been serially passaged as cell lines. The term "human embryonic stem cells" (hES cells) refers human embryo derived cells. More specifically hES refers to cells isolated from the inner cell mass of human blastocysts or morulae and that have been serially passaged as cell lines and 15 can also include blastomeres and aggregated blastomeres. The term "human embryo-derived cells" (hEDC) refers to morula-derived cells, blastocyst-derived cells including those of the inner cell mass, embryonic shield, or epiblast, or other totipotent or pluripotent stem cells of the early embryo, including primitive endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm and their derivatives, also including 20 blastomeres and cell masses from aggregated single blastomeres or embryos from varying stages of development, but excluding human embryonic stem cells that have been passaged as cell lines. Embryonic stem (ES) cells which have the ability to differentiate into virtually any tissue of a human body can provide a limitless supply of rejuvenated and 25 histocompatible cells for transplantation therapy, as the problem of immune rejection can be overcome with nuclear transfer and parthenogenetic technology. The recent findings of Hirano et al (2003) have shown that mouse ES cells can produce eye-like structures in differentiation experiments in vitro. Among those, pigmented epithelial cells were described, resembling retinal pigment epithelium. Preliminary 30 experiments carried out at Advanced Cell Technology with primate and human ES cell lines show that in a specialized culture system these cells differentiate into RPE like cells that can be isolated and passaged. Human and mouse NT, Cyno parthenote ES cell derivatives have multiple features of RPE: these pigmented epithelial cells express four molecular markers of RPE - bestrophin, CRALBP, PEDF, and RPE65; 14 like RPE, their proliferation in culture is accompanied by dedifferentiation - loss of pigment and epithelial morphology, both of which are restored after the cells form a monolayer and become quiescent. Such RPE-like cells can be easily passaged, frozen and thawed, thus allowing their expansion. Histological analysis of differentiating ES 5 cultures shows a pattern of cells consistent with early retinal development, including aggregates of cells similar to rods and cones. RPE Transplantation At present, chronic, slow rejection of the RPE allografts prevents scientists 10 from determining the therapeutic efficacy of this RPE transplantation. Several methods are being considered to overcome this obstacle. The easiest way is to use systemic immunosuppression, which is associated with serious side-effects such as cancer and infection. A second approach is to transplant the patient's own RPE, i.e. homografts, but this has the drawback of using old, diseased RPE to replace even 15 more diseased RPE. Yet, a third approach is to use iris epithelium (IPE) from the same patient but this has the drawback that IPE may not perform all the vision related functions of RPE. The present invention substantially reduces the possibility that transplantation rejection will occur, because RPE or RPE-like cells derived from hES cells could be 20 derived from a bank of hES cells with homozygosity in the HLA region or could be derived from cloned hES cell lines. .. Also, nuclear transfer and parthenogenesis facilitate histocompatibility of grafted RPE cells and progenitors. RPE defects in Retinitis Pigmentosa 25 Retinitis pigmentosa is a hereditary condition in which the vision receptors are gradually destroyed through abnormal genetic programming. Some forms cause total blindness at relatively young ages, where other forms demonstrate characteristic "bone spicule" retinal changes with little vision destruction. This disease affects some 1.5 million people worldwide. Two gene defects that cause autosomal recessive RP 30 have been found in genes expressed exclusively in RPE: one is due to an RPE protein involved in vitamin A metabolism (cis retinaldehyde binding protein), a second involves another protein unique to RPE, RPE65. With the use of hES cell derived RPE cell lines cultured without the use of non-human animal cells, both of these forms of RP should be treatable immediately by RPE transplantation. This treatment 15 was inconceivable a few years ago when RP was a hopelessly untreatable and a poorly understood form of blindness. New research in RPE transplantation suggests there is promise for the treatment of retinal degeneration, including macular degeneration. In addition, a 5 number of patients with advanced RP have regained some useful vision following fetal retinal cell transplant. One of the patients, for instance, improved from barely seeing light to being able to count fingers held at a distance of about six feet from the patient's face. In a second case, vision improved to ability to see letters through tunnel vision. The transplants in these studies were performed by injection, introducing the 10 new retinal cells underneath the existing neural retina. Not all of the cells survived since the transplanted fetal cells were allogeneic (i.e. not genetically-matched), although those that did survive formed connections with other neurons and begin to function like the photoreceptors around them. Approximately a year after the first eight people received the transplants, four have recovered some visual function and a 15 fifth shows signs of doing so. Three newly derived human embryonic stem cell lines are similar in properties to those described earlier (Thomson et al. 1998, Reibunoff et al., 2000, Richards et al., 2000, Lanzendorf et al., 2001): they maintain undifferentiated phenotype and express known markers of undifferentiated hES cells, Oct-4, alkaline phosphatase, SSEA-3, 20 SSEA-4, TRA-I-60, TRA-I-81 through 45 passages in culture or over 130 population doublings. All hES cell lines differentiate into derivatives of three germ layers in EB or long term adherent cultures and in teratomas. One of the differentiation derivatives of hES cells is similar to retinal pigment epithelium by the following criteria: morphologically, they have a typical epithelial cobblestone monolayer appearance and 25 contain dark brown pigment in their cytoplasm, which is known to be present in the human body only in melanocytes, keratinocytes, retinal and iris pigment epithelium (IPE). Melanocytes, however, are non-epithelial cells, and keratinocytes don't secrete but only accumulate melanin. The set of RPE-specific proteins -- bestrophin, CRALBP, PEDF - present in these cells indicates that they are likely to be similar to 30 RPE and not IPE. Another similarity is the behavior of isolated pigmented cells in culture, when little or no pigment was seen in proliferating cells but was retained in tightly packed epithelial islands or re-expressed in newly established cobblestone monolayer after the cells became quiescent. Such behavior was described for RPE cells in culture (reviewed by Zhao et al., 1997), and it was previously reported 16 (Vinores et al., 1995) that a neuronal marker tubulin beta III was specifically localized in dedifferentiating RPE cells in vitro and not in the cells with the typical RPE morphology suggesting that it reflects the plasticity of RPE and its ability to dedifferentiate to a neural lineage. The inventors have observed the same pattern of 5 tubulin beta III localization in primary and passaged cultures of RPE and RPE-like cells which can reflect a dedifferentiation of such cells in culture or indicate a separate population of cells committed to a neuronal fate, that were originally located next to pigmented cells through differentiation of hES cells in long-term cultures and could have been co-isolated with RPE-like cells. 10 In the growing optic vesicle RPE and the neural retina share the same bipotential neuroepithelial progenitor, and their fate was shown to be determined by Pax2, Pax6, and Mitf (Baumer et al., 2003), the latter being a target of the first two. Pax6 at earlier stages acts as an activator of proneural genes and is downregulated in the RPE in further development, remaining in amacrine and ganglion cells in mature 15 retina (reviewed by Ashery -Padan and Gruss, 2001). In goldfish, it is also found in mitotically active progenitors of regenerating neurons (Hitchcock et al., 1996). The inventors have found that many of the RPE-like cells expressed mitf and Pax6 in a pattern similar to tubulin beta III and were found only in non-pigmented cells of non epithelial morphology that surround pigmented epithelial islands in long term cultures 20 or in cells with a "partial" RPE phenotype (lightly pigmented and loosely packed). In proliferating cells in recently passaged cultures all these markers were found nearly in every cell suggesting either a reversal of RPE-like cells to progenitor stage at the onset of proliferation or massive proliferation of retinal progenitors. Interestingly, in teratomas where islands of pigmented cells of epithelial morphology were also found, 25 Pax6 was expressed in non-pigmented cells adjacent to pigmented regions (data not shown). Multiple studies have previously shown dedifferentiation of RPE in culture and their transdifferentiation into cells of neuronal phenotype (Reh and Gretton, 1987, Skaguchi et al., 1997, Vinores et al., 1995, Chen et al., 2003), neuronal, amacrine and photoreceptor cells (Zhao et al., 1995), glia (Skaguchi et al., 1997), neural retina 30 (Galy et al., 2002), and to neuronal progenitors (Opaz and Dziak, 1993). Such progenitors can in turn coexist with mature RPE-like cells in culture or appear as a result of dedifferentiation of RPE-like cells. At the same time, cells of neural retina can transdifferentiate into R-PE in vitro (Opas et al., 2001), so alternatively, tubulin beta III and Pax6 positive cells could represent a transient stage of such 17 transdifferentiation of co-isolated neural cells or neural progenitors into RPE-like cells. Differentiation of hES cells into RPE-like cells happened spontaneously when using methods described in the Examples below, and the inventors noticed that 5 pigmented epithelial cells reliably appeared in cultures older than 6-8 weeks and their number progressed overtime -- in 3-5 months cultures nearly every EB had a large pigmented region. In addition to the described hES lines, six more newly derived hES lines turned into RPE-like cells, which suggests that since neural fate is usually chosen by ES cells spontaneously, RPE-like cells can arise by default as an advanced 10 stage of such pathway. It is also possible that in such long term cultures, where differentiating hES cells form a multi-layered environment, permissive and/or instructive differentiation signals come from extracellular matrix and growth factors produced by differentiating derivatives of hES cells. The model of differentiation of hES cells into RPE-like cells could be a useful tool to study how such 15 microenvironment orchestrates RPE differentiation and transdifferentiation. RPE plays an important role in photoreceptor maintenance, and various RPE malfunctions in vivo are associated with a number of vision-altering ailments, such as RPE detachment, displasia, atrophy, retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa, macular dystrophy or degeneration, including age-related macular degeneration, which can 20 result in photoreceptor damage and blindness. Because of its wound healing abilities, RPE has been extensively studied in application to transplantation therapy. It has been shown in several animal models and in humans (Gouras et al., 2002, Stanga et al., 2002, Binder et al., 2002, Schraermeyer et al., 2001, reviewed by Lund et al., 2001) that RPE transplantation has a good potential of vision restoration. Recently another 25 prospective niche for RPE transplantation was proposed and even reached the phase of clinical trials: since these cells secrete dopamine, they could be used for treatment of Parkinson disease (Subramanian, 2001). However, even in an immune-privileged eye, there is a problem of graft rejection, hindering the progress of this approach if allogenic transplant is used. The other problem is the reliance on fetal tissue, as adult 30 RPE has a very low proliferative potential. The present invention decreases the likelihood that graft rejection will occur and removes the reliance on the use of fetal tissue. As a source of immune compatible tissues, hES cells hold a promise for transplantation therapy, as the problem of immune rejection can be overcome with 18 nuclear transfer technology. The use of the new differentiation derivatives of human ES cells, including retinal pigment epithelium-like cells and neuronal precursor cells, and the use of the differentiation system for producing the same offers an attractive potential supply of RPE and neuronal precursor cells for transplantation. 5 EXAMPLES Example 1 Spontaneous differentiation into pigmented epithelial cells in long term cultures 10 When hES cell cultures are allowed to overgrow on MEF in the absence of LIF, FGF and Plasmanate, they form a thick multilayer of cells. About 6 weeks later, dark islands of cells appear within the larger clusters (Figure 1). These dark cells are easily seen with the naked eye and looked like "freckles" in a plate of cells as shown 15 in Figure 1A. At higher magnification these islands appear as tightly packed polygonal cells in a cobblestone monolayer, typical of epithelial cells, with brown pigment in the cytoplasm (Figure 1 C). There are differences in the amount of pigment in the cells with cells in the central part of the islands having the most pigment and those near the edges the least. (Figure 1E and IF). 20 When hES cells form embryoid bodies (EB) - pigmented epithelial cells appear in about 1-2% of EBs in the first 6-8 weeks (Figure 1B) . Over time more and more EBs develop pigmented cells, and by 3 months nearly every EB had a pigmented epithelial region (Figure 1D). Morphology of the cells in the pigmented regions of EBs was very similar to that of adherent cultures (Figure 1 D). 25 Example 2 Isolation and culture ofpigmented epithelial cells The inventors isolated pigmented epithelial cells from both adherent hES cell 30 cultures and from EBs. Pigmented polygonal cells were digested with enzymes (trypsin, and/or collagenase, and/or dispase), and the cells from these pigmented islands were selectively picked with a glass capillary. Although care was taken to pick only pigmented cells, the population of isolated cells invariably contained some 19 non-pigmented cells. After plating cells on gelatin or laminin for 1-2 days, the cells were considered to be primary cultures (PO). Primary cultures contained islands of pigmented polygonal cells as well as some single pigmented cells. After 3-4 days in culture, non-pigmented cells that 5 seemed to have lost epithelial morphology (flatter and cells with lanellipodia) appeared at the periphery of some islands (Figure 2). The number of such peripheral cells increased over time, suggesting that these cells were proliferating, and after 2 weeks most cells in the newly formed monolayer contained very little or no pigment. After continued culture, for another 2-3 weeks, pigmented epithelial cells began to 10 reappear, visibly indistinguishable from those in the original cultures (Figure 2). Example 3 Detection of RPE markers 15 The preliminary characterization of these differentiated human cells as RPE is based on their similarity to RPE cultures previously described; principally, their epithelial morphology and possession of pigment. There are three types of pigmented epithelial cells in human body: retinal and iris pigmented epithelium and keratinocytes, but the latter don't secrete pigment. The epithelial structure and 20 cobblestone morphology are not shared by other pigmented cells, e.g. melanocytes. It is also noteworthy that RPE cells have been shown to lose and regain their pigment and epithelial morphology when grown in culture (Zhao 1997, Opas and Dziak, 1994), and the pigmented cells behaved in a similar manner, so to test the hypothesis that the ES derived cells may be RPE, they were stained with antibodies to known 25 markers for RPE: bestrophin and CRALBP. Figure 3 (left panel) shows membrane localization of bestrophin (A) and CRALBP (C), both are found in pigmented epithelial islands. Not all of the cells stain with these antibodies and intensity of staining correlated with pigment expression and "tightness" of colonies - the borders of each pigmented island where cells were larger and more loosely packed showed 30 lower expression of both proteins. To further characterize presumably RPE cells, analysis was performed on the expression of bestrophin, CRALBP by Western blotting. Figure 3 (right panel, top) shows the bands, corresponding to bestrophin, 68 kD (a), CRALBP, 36 kD (b) in cell 20 lysates. All these proteins were found in both primary cultures and subsequent passages. Another known PRE marker, RPE65, was found in the RPE-like cells by real time RT-PCR (Figure 3, right panel, bottom). As shown in Figure 3, right panel, 5 bottom, expression of RPE65 was confirmed in all hES-RPE samples analyzed. Interestingly, mature cultures (seven weeks after passaging) had four to nine folds more RPE65 mRNA than the control undifferentiated hES cells, whereas earlier passage (two-week old) cultures only exceeded the control by 1.5 to 2.5 fold. See Figure 3, right panel, bottom. 10 PEDF ELISA assay showed the presence of PEDF in cell lysates of all presumed RPE cultures, and Western blot showed a band of approximately 48 kD (not shown). Detection of markers of neuronal and retinal progenitors in RPE-like cultures 15 PAX-6, Pax2, mitf and tubulin beta III were shown to be expressed in the majority of cells in recently passaged and only in a small number of cells in old cultures of RPE-like cells derived from hES cells (Figure 4). In proliferating cultures (day 3 after trypsinization) where RPE-like morphology of the proliferating cells is lost, nearly every cell showed the presence of 20 mitf, Pax6, tubulin beta III and nestin. Pax2 was found only a small subset of cells which appeared mitf-negative, while there was a strong degree of co-localization of Pax6/mitf, mitf/tubulin beta III, and Pax6/tubulin beta III. In 21 days old quiescent cultures after pigmented epithelial islands were reestablished, groups of PAX-6 and mitf were found mostly in non-pigmented cells of non-epithelial morphology between 25 pigmented epithelial islands (Figure 4, A-C). and tubulin beta III had a similar pattern of distribution (not shown). However, there were populations of mitf-positive and Pax6-negative cells, located close to the periphery of pigmented islands (Figure 4, A C). Pax2 was found only in a very small subset of mitf-negative cells (Figure 4, E-H). No presence of either of these proteins was ever detected in the cells of "mature" 30 pigmented epithelial islands. However, these markers in cells that only had some RPE features were often visible, i.e. either looked epithelial but had no pigment or in certain single pigmented cells away from pigmented epithelial islands. 21 F-xample 4 Characterization of RPE-like cells derived from hES cell line ACT J-1 from Cyno-1 FS cells and derivation of RPE-like cells from existing hES cell lines Hi, H9, and H7. 5 An RPE-like cell line is expanded, tested for freezing and recovery, and characterized using the following methods and molecular markers of RPE cells: bestrophin and CRALBP by Western blot and immunofluorescence, PEDF by ELISA and Western blot, and RPE65 by RT-PCR. The cells are injected in SCID mice with undifferentiated hES or Cyno-I cells as a control to evaluate tumorigenicity. 10 Karyotyping of RPE-like cells will be done by a clinical laboratory on a commercial basis. Characterization of the functional properties of RPE-like cells and studies of their transplantation potential are then carried out as otherwise described in this application and also using those techniques known to those skilled in the art. Gene expression profiling experiments are done using Affymetrix human 15 genome arrays. Gene expression is compared in RPE-like cells derived from ES cells and in retinal samples from autopsies. Several animal models can be used to verify the effectiveness of the transplanted RPE-like cells, including but not limited to, rhesus monkey, rat, and rabbit. 20 Example 5 Optimization of the differentiation culture system ensuring high yields of RPE-like cells. ES cells are cultured on feeder cells or as embryoid bodies (EB) in the 25 presence of factors such as bFGF, insulin, TGF-beta, IBMX, bmp-2, bmp-4 or their combinations, including stepwise addition. Alternatively, ES cells are grown on various extracellular matrix-coated plates (laminin, fibronectin, collagen I, collagen IV, Matrigel, etc.) in evaluating the role of ECM in RPE formation. Expression of molecular markers of early RPE progenitors (Pax6, Pax2, mitf) and of RPE cells 30 (CRALBP, bestrophin, PEDF, RPE65) are evaluated at various time intervals by real time RT-PCR to verify and determine successful combinations of the above mentioned agents and stepwise procedure that produces enrichment in RPE-like cells or their progenitors. This approach can also be used to produce common progenitors of RPE and other eye tissues, such as photoreceptor or neural retina which can be 22 isolated and further characterized for their differentiation potential and used in transplantation studies. Example 6 5 Derivation of RPE and other eye tissue progenitorsfrom existing and new ES cell lines. Using the data from the gene expression profiling, expression of the RPE progenitor markers will be correlated with the expression of the surface proteins in 10 order to find a unique combination of surface markers for RPE progenitor cells. If such markers are found, antibodies to surface proteins can bc used to isolate a pure population of RPE progenitors that can be then cultured and further differentiated in culture or used in transplantation studies to allow their differentiation after grafting. If the data from the gene expression profiling experiments is insufficient, to 15 isolate the RPE progenitors the following approach will be used. ES cells and RPE like cells will be transfected with GFP under the control of a promoter such as Pax6, and stable transfectants will be selected. From a culture of transfected differentiating ES cells or proliferating (dedifferentiated) RPE cells, GFP/Pax6-positive cells will be isolated by FACS and used as an antigen source for mouse injection to raise 20 monoclonal antibodies to the surface molecules of Pax6 positive cells. Because Pax6 is present not only in RPE progenitors, screening will be done (by FACS) using several strategies: a) against proliferating RPE-like cells, b) against Pax2-positive RPE cells, c) against mitf-positive RPE cells. For b) and c) RPE cells will be transfected with GFP under the corresponding promoter; as a negative control, RPE or 25 ES cells negative by these antigens will be used. After expansion of positive clones selected by all three strategies, antibodies will be tested against all types of cells used in screening and further analyzed: since this strategy can produce antibodies that recognize cell surface antigens specific and non-specific for RPE progenitors, the cells from differentiating total population of ES cells or of RPE cells selected with 30 these antibodies will be assessed for molecular markers of R.PE progenitors and for their ability to produce RPE. Using the optimized defined stepwise procedures to produce RPE or other early progenitors of eye tissues and the antibodies to their unique surface markers, such progenitors will be isolated from differentiated ES cells and cultured in vitro. 23 Their ability to differentiate into various tissues of the eye will be investigated using the strategy described in Aim 2. ES cell lines that already produced RPE-like cells (HI, H7, H9, ACT J-1, ACT-4, Cyno-1), RPE-like cells will be used to continue to derive RPE-like cells and 5 their progenitors as described in Aims 1 and 2. After expansion and characterization for molecular markers of RYE, these lines will be single-cell cloned, and the resulting lines will be characterized as described in Aim 1. The lines meeting criteria for RPE cells will be used for transplantation studies. New human ES cell lines will be derived from unused IVF embryos, from donated oocytes, stimulated to develop without 10 fertilization (parthenote), and from generated developing blastocysts obtained from donated oocytes with the application of nuclear transfer technology. RPE-like cells and common eye progenitors will be derived from these lines using the approach in Aim 2, and the resulting lines will be characterized as in Aim 1. [Optional] new human ES cell lines will be derived in a virus-free system, characterized and 15 submitted for clinical trials. Example 7 Therapeutic potential of RPE-like cells and progenitors in various animal models of retinitis pigmentosa & macular degeneration. 20 Primate ES cells are tested in cynomologus monkeys (Macaques). Initially, vitrectomy surgery is performed and the cells are transplanted into the subretinal space of the animals. The first step is the transplantation of the cells in the suspension format after which a substrate or matrix is used to produce a monolayer 25 transplantation. This can also be performed in immunosuppressed rabbits using cells derived from human ES-cells and also in various other animal models of retinitis pigmentosa, including rodents (rd mouse, RPE-65 knockout mouse, tubby-like mouse, RCS rat, cats (Abyssinian cat), and dogs (cone degeneration "cd" dog, progressive rod-cone degeneration "prcd" dog, early retinal degeneration "erd" dog, rod-cone 30 dysplasia 1, 2 & 3 "redl, rcd2 & rcd3" dogs, photoreceptor dysplasia "pd" dog, and Briard "RPE-65) dog). Evaluation is performed using fluorescent angiography, histology (whether or not there is photoreceptor restoration and possibly ERG. Functional testing will also be carried out, including phagocytosis (photoreceptor 24 fragments), vitamin A metabolism, tight junctions conductivity, and electron microscopy. Example 8 5 Direct differentiation of RPE cells from human embryo-derived cells. Human blastocyst-staged embryos are plated in the presence of urine or chick embryo fibroblasts with or without immunosurgery to remove the trophectoderm or directly plates on extracellular matrix protein-coated tissue 10 cultureware. Instead of culturing and passaging the cells to produce a human ES cell line, the cells are directly differentiated. When hEDC cell cultures are allowed to overgrow on MEF in the absence of LIF, FGF and Plasmanate, they will form a thick multilayer of cells. (Alternate growth factors, media, and FBS can be used to alternate direct differentiation as is 15 known to those skilled in the art.) About 6 weeks later, dark islands of cells will appear within the larger clusters. These dark cells are easily seen with the naked eye and looked like "freckles" in a plate of cells as shown in Figure 5B. At higher magnification these islands appear as tightly packed polygonal cells in a cobblestone monolayer, typical of epithelial cells, with brown pigment in the cytoplasm (Figure 20 5A). There are differences in the amount of pigment in the cells with cells in the central part of the islands having the most pigment and those near the edges the least. (Figure 5B). When hEDC cells are directly differentiated they may, though typically have not, formed embryoid bodies (EB). Pigmented epithelial cells appear in about 1-2% 25 of these differentiated cells and/or EBs in the first 6-8 weeks. Over time more and more EBs develop pigmented cells, and by 3 months nearly every EB had a pigmented epithelial region. Morphology of the cells in the pigmented regions of EBs was very similar to that of adherent cultures. 30 Materials and methods: MEF medium: high glucose DMEM, supplemented with 2 mM GlutaMAX I, and 500 u/ml Penicillin, 500 ug/ml streptomycin (all from Invitrogen) and 16% FCS (HyCLone). hES Cells Growth medium: knockout high glucose DMEM supplemented with 500 u/ml Penicillin, 500 pg/ml streptomycin, I % non-essential 25 amino acids solution, 2 mM GlutaMAX I,, 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 4 ng/ml bFGF (Invitrogen), 1-ng/ml human LIF (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), 8.4% of Serum Replacement (SR, Invitrogen) and 8.4% Plasmanate (Bayer). Derivation medium contained the same components as growth medium except that it had lower 5 concentration of SR and Plasmanate (4.2% each) and 8.4 % FCS and 2x concentration of human LIF and bFGF, as compared to growth medium. EB medium: same as growth medium except bFGF, LIF, and Plasmanate; the SR concentration was 13%. RPE medium: 50% EB medium and 50% MEF medium, 10 hES cell lines Differentiation experiments were performed with adherent hES cells or with embryoid bodies (EBs). For adherent differentiation, hES cells were allowed to overgrow on MEFs until the hES colonies lost their tight borders at which time the culture media was replaced with EB medium (usually, 8-10 days after passaging). 15 The medium was changed every 1-2 days. For EB formation, hES cells were trypsinized and cultured in EB medium on low adherent plates (Costar). Immunostaining Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% NP-40 20 for localization of intracellular antigens, and blocked with 10% goat serum, 10% donkey serum (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) in PBS (Invitrogen) for at least one hour. Incubation with primary antibodies was carried out overnight at 4 *C, the secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) were added for one hour. Between all incubations specimens were 25 washed with 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma) in PBS 3-5 times, 10-15 minutes each wash. Specimens were mounted using Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and observed under fluorescent microscope (Nikon). Antibodies used: bestrophin (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), anti-CRALBP antibody was a generous gift from Dr. Saari, University of Washington. Secondary antibodies were 30 from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, and Streptavidin-FITC was purchased from Amersham. Isolation and passaging of RPE-like cells 26 Adherent cultures of hES cells or EBs were rinsed with PBS twice and incubated in 0.25% Trypsin/l mM EDTA (Invitrogen) at 37 "C until the monolayer loosened, Cells from the pigmented regions were scraped off with a glass capillary, transferred to MEF medium, centrifuged at 200X g, and plated onto gelatin-coated 5 plates in RPE medium. The medium was changed after the cells attached (usually in 1-2 days) and every 5-7 days after that; the cells were passaged every 2-4 weeks with 0.05% Trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA (Invitrogen). Western blot and ELISA 10 Samples were prepared in Laemmli buffer (Laemmli, 1970), supplemented with 5% Mercaptoethanol and Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), boiled for 5 minutes and loaded onto a 8-16% gradient gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using a Mini Protean apparatus; the gels were run at 25-30 mA per gel; proteins were transferred to a 0.2 Nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher and Shull, Keene, NH) at 20 volt 15 overnight. Blots were briefly stained with Ponceau Red (Sigma) to visualize the bands, washed with Milli-Q water, and blocked for 1 hour with 5% non-fat dry milk in 0.1% TBST (Bio-Rad). Primary antibodies to bestrophin, CRALBP or PEDF (Chemicon) were added for 2 hours followed by three 15-minute washes with TBST; peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were added for 1 hour, and the washes 20 were repeated. Blots were detected using ECL system with Super-Signal reagent (Pierce). PEDF ELISA was performed on cell lysates using PEDF ELISA kit (Chemicon) according to manufacturer's protocol. Real-time RT-PCR 25 Total RNA was purified from differentiating ES cultures by a two-step procedure Crude RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and further purified on RNeasy minicolumns (Qiagen), The levels of RPE65 transcripts were monitored by real-time PCR using a commercial primer set for RPE65 detection (Assay on Demand # HsOO165642_ml, Applied Biosystems) and Quantitect Probe 30 RT-PCR reagents (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer's (Qiagen) protocol. 27 Example 9 Use of transcriptomics to identify normal differentiated cells differentiated ex vivo. 5 hES-cell derivatives are likely to play an important role in the future of regenerative medicine. Qualitative assessment of these and other stem cell derivatives remains a challenge that could be approached using functional genomics. We compared the transcriptional profile of hES-RPE vs. its in vivo counterpart, fetal RPE cells, which have been extensively researched for its transplantation value. Both 10 profiles were then compared with previously published (Rogojina et al., 2003) transcriptomics data on human RPE cell lines. The gene expression profile of our data set was compared to two human RPE cell lines (non-transformed ARPE-19 and transformed D407, Rogojina et al., 2003) to determine whether hES-RPE have similar global transcriptional profiles. To account 15 for common housekeeping genes expressed in all cells, we used publicly available Affymetrix data sets from undifferentiated hES cells (HI line, hl-hES, -- Sato et al., 2003) and bronchial epithelial cells (BE, Wright et al., 2004) as a control based on its common epithelial origin that would allow to exclude common housekeeping and epithelial genes and identify RPE-specific genes. 20 There were similarities and differences between hES-RPE, hES-RPE-TD, ARPE-19, D407. The similarities were further demonstrated by analyzing the exclusive intersection between those genes present in hES-RPE/ARPE- 19 but not in BE (1026 genes). To account for background, we compared this to the exclusive intersection of genes present in BE/hES-RPE, but not ARPE-19 (186 genes), which 25 results in a five- to six-fold greater similarity in hES-RPE and ARPE-19 when compared to BE. D407/ARPE19 appear to lose RPE specific genes such as RPE65, Bestrophin, CRALBP, PEDF, which is typical of long-term passaged cells (Figure 6). Further data mining revealed known RPE specific ontologies such as melanin biosynthesis, vision, retinol-binding, only in fetal RPE and ES-RPE but not ARPE 19. 30 Comparison of hES-RPE, ARPE-19 and D407 to their in vivo counterpart, freshly isolated human fetal RPE (feRPE), was in concordance with our previous data, demonstrating that the transcriptional identity of hES-RPE to human feRPE is significantly greater than D407 to fe RPE (2.3 fold difference- 849 genes/373 genes) and ARPE-19 to feRPE (1.6 fold difference - 588 genes/364 genes (Figure Sc/5d). 28 The RYE specific markers identified above, which were only present in hES-RPE and not in ARPE-19 or D407 were also present in feRPE, demonstrating a higher similarity of hES-RPE to its in vivo counterpart than of the cultured RPE lines. Seven-hundred-and-eighty-four genes present in hES-RPE were absent in 5 feRPE and ARPE-1 9 data sets. Since the retention of "sternness" genes could potentially cause transformation of hES derivatives into malignant teratomas if transplanted into patients, we created a conservative potential "sternness" genes data using currently available Affymetrix microarray data sets Abeyta et.al 2004 Sato 2003). This resulted in a list of 3806 genes present in all 12 data sets (including 10 common housekeeping genes). j Only 36 of the 784 genes present in the hES-RPE data set but not feRPE-ARPE-19 were common to the 3806 potential sternness genes. None of these were known sternness genes such as Oct4, Sox2, TDGF1. Example 10 15 Use of RPE cells for treatment of Parkinson's Disease. hRPE can be used as an alternative source of cells for cell therapy of Parkinson's Disease because they secrete L-DOPA. Studies have showed that such cells attached to gelatin-coated microcarriers can be successfully transplanted in 20 hemiparkinsonian monkeys and produced notable improvements (10-50) thousand cells per target), and in FDA-approved trial started in 2000 the patients received hRPE intrastriatial transplants without adverse effects. One of the many advantages to the use of hES cell-derived RPE is that it circumvents the shortage of donor eye tissue. It also facilitates the use of gene therapy. 25 Example 11 Use of stem cell derived RPE cell line for rescuing or preventing photoreceptor loss Derivation of'RPE cell lines 30 Human embryonic stem ("hES") cells were grown in MEF medium containing high glucose DMEM, supplemented with 2 mM GlutaMAX I or glutamine, 500 u/ml Penicillin, 500 tg/ml streptomycin (all from Invitrogen) and 16% FCS (can range from 8 to 20%) (HyCLone). hES cells may be grown in growth medium containing knockout high glucose DMEM supplemented with 500 u/ml Penicillin, 500 pg/ml 29 streptomycin, I % non-essential amino acids solution, 2 mM GlutaMAX I, 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 4 ng/ml (or up to 80) bFQF (Invitrogen), 10 ng/ml (or up to 100) human LIF (LIF is optional) (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), 8.4% of Serum Replacement (can be used up to 20%) (SR, Invitrogen) and 8.4% Plasmanate 5 (optional) (Bayer). EB medium is the same as growth medium except bFGF, LIF, and Plasmanate are not included and the SR concentration was 13%. RPE medium is 50% EB medium and 50% MEF medium. Alternatively, hES cells can be cultured in the presence of human serum or FBS. For RPE culture, different media can be used that supports its proliferation, transdifferentiation and re-establishment of 10 differentiated phenotype. Examples include, but are not limited to, high glucose DMEM supplemented with 2 mM GlutaMAX I or glutamine, 500 u/ml Penicillin, 500 ptg/ml streptomycin (antibiotics are optional) (all from Invitrogen) and 16% FCS (can range from 8 to 20%) (HyClone) or human serum; 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and Ham's F12 medium containing 1.2 g/L sodium 15 bicarbonate, 2.5 mM L-glutamine, 15 mM HEPES 0.5 mM sodium pyruvate,; fetal bovine serum, 10%; (from ATCC, recommended for propagation of ARPE- 19 cell line established from human RPE cells). A cell culture medium that supports the differentiation of human retinal pigment epithelium into functionally polarized monolayers may also be employed for this purpose. 20 RPE may be cultured as previously described (Hu and Bok, Molecular Vision (2000) 7:14-19, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference) or other culture medium which has serum or serum replacement components or growth factor combination that supports RPE growth. Two of the hES cell used for these studies were derived as described (Cowan 25 et al., N. Eng. J Med. 350: 1353-1356 (2004), Klimanskaya and McMahon, Handbook ofStem Cells, Vol. 1: Embryonic Stem Cells, Edited by Lanza et al., Elsevier/Academic Press, pp. 437-449 (2004), the disclosures of both are incorporated by reference), three lines were derived by Jamie Thomson (HI, H7, & H9) Human frozen blastocysts were donated to the study by couples who had 30 completed their fertility treatment. Differentiation experiments were performed with adherent hES cells or with embryoid bodies (EBs). For adherent differentiation, hES cells were allowed to 30 overgrow on MEFs until the hES colonies lost their tight borders, at which time the culture media was replaced with EB medium (usually, 8-10 days after passaging). The medium was changed as it became yellow or every 1-2 days for dense cultures and less frequently for sparse cultures or EBs. For EB formation, hES cells were 5 trypsinizedend cultured in EB medium on low adherent plates (Costar). Immunostaining Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% NP-40 for localization of intracellular antigens, and blocked with 10% goat serum, 10% 10 donkey serum (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) in PBS (Invitrogen) for at least one hour. The specimen were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 "C, and then incubated with secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) for one hour. Between all incubations, the specimens were washed with 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma) in PBS 3-5 15 times for 10-15 minutes each wash. Specimens were mounted using Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and observed under fluorescent microscope (Nikon), Antibodies used include anti-bestrophin antibody (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), and anti-CRALBP antibody (a gift from Dr. Saari, University of Washington). Secondary antibodies were obtained from Jackson 20 [mmunoresearch Laboratories, and Streptavidin-FITC was purchased from Amersham. Isolation and passaging ofRPE-like cells Adherent cultures of hES cells or EBs were rinsed with PBS twice and 25 incubated in 0.25% Trypsin/1 mM EDTA (Invitrogen) at 37 "C until the monolayer loosened. Cells from the pigmented regions were scraped off with a glass capillary, transferred to MEF medium, centrifuged at 200X g, and plated onto gelatin-coated plates in RPE medium. The medium was changed after the cells attached (usually in 1-2 days) and every 5-7 days after that. The cells were passaged every 2-4 weeks 30 with 0.05% Trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA (Invitrogen). Cells may be passaged or collected for transplantation using trypsin or collagenase IV, collagenase I, or dispase at concentrations of 1-10%. Any combination of these at concentrations of 1-10% each could be used instead of trypsin for isolation and passaging of pigmented cells. "Combination" in this context is 31 intended to mean use of such enzymes together or sequentially -e.g., collagenase digestion followed by trypsin. The passage dilution may vary from no dilution to 1:6 or higher. The substrate for culture prior to transplantation may be anything that supports growth and features of hES-RPE, such as, but not limited to, gelatin, 5 fibronectin, laminin, collagen or different types of extracellular matrix, uncoated plastic surface, filters -- uncoated or coated with ECM (extracellular matrix) proteins, Matrigel, ECM isolated from other cell cultures, such as cornea, RPE, fibroblasts, uncoated beads, or beads coated with ECM. The time between passaging can vary from one day to several weeks. In prior experiments, nine-month old embryoid 10 bodies with sheets of RPE on the surface were used to establish passagable cultures of hES-RPE so there is no limit known on how long the cells can be kept in culture without passaging. Cultures may consist not only of cells with proper RPE morphology-i.e. polygonal tightly packed pigmented cells-but also of cells with varying degree of 15 transdifferentiation (elongated pigmented or non-pigmented cells, etc.) and other cell types that co-differentiate from hES cells. Unless cells are individually selected for culturing, such cultures usually contain RPE islands that are separated by non-RPE cells. The cultures of differentiating ES cells that exhibited the signs of 20 differentiation along the neural lineage (expressing markers of this lineage, such as nestin, Pax6, etc., as could be detected by RT-PCR, Western blot, immunostaining, histology, or morphology of the individual cells which could be islands of pigmented cells, or epithelial sheets, or aggregates of vacuolated cells) were passaged with trypsin, collagenase, dispase, or mixture of such, expanded and cultured until the 25 pigmented epithelial islands appeared or multiplied in numbers (usually, one or two passages). Such mixed cultures of pigmented epithelial and non-pigmented non epithelial cells could be used to selectively hand-pick pigmented and non-pigmented cells after collagenase or collagenase-dispase digestion. These hand-picked pigmented and non-pigmented cells could then be dispersed into smaller aggregates 30 and single cells or plated without dispersion, resulting in establishment of high purity RPE cultures. Western blot and ELISA 32 Samples were prepared in Laemmli buffer (Laemmli, 1970), supplemented with 5% Mercaptoethanol and Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), boiled for 5 minutes and loaded onto a 8-16% gradient gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using a Mini Protean apparatus; the gels were run at 25-30 mA per gel. Proteins were then 5 transferred from the gel to a 0.2 Nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher and Shull, Keene, NH) at 20 volt overnight. Blots were briefly stained with Ponceau Red (Sigma) to visualize the bands, washed with Milli-Q water, and blocked for 1 hour with 5% non-fat dry milk in 0.1% TBST(Bio-Rad). Primary antibodies to bestrophin, CRALBP or PEDF (Chemicon) were added to the blot for 2 hours followed by three 10 15-minute washes with TBST. peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were then added to the blot for 1 hour, and the washes were repeated. Blots were detected using ECL system with Super-Signal reagent (Pierce). PEDF ELISA was performed on cell lysates using PEDF ELISA kit (Chemicon) according to the manufacturer's protocol. 15 Real-time RT-PCR Total RNA was purified from differentiating ES cultures by a two-step procedure. Crude RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and further purified on RNeasy minicolumns (Qiagen). The levels of RPE65 transcripts were 20 monitored by real-time PCR using a commercial primer set for RPE65 detection (Assay on Demand # HsOO 165642 ml, Applied Biosystems) and QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR reagents (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer's (Qiagen) protocol. Transplantation of hES-derived RPE cell line 25 Cultures of hES cell lines may be used as transplant cells to one eye of 23-day old RCS rats to rescue or prevent photoreceptor loss. Cells of different morphology and/or of different degrees of differentiation may be chosen. Transplantation may be done as described (Lund et al. (2001) Proc. Nal. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9942-47; Del Priore et al. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2004) 45: 985-992; 30 Gouras et al. (2002) Ophthalmology & Visual Science 43: 3307-11, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein). Following digestion with trypsin or other enzyme (as described above), hES cells may be washed, and delivered trans sclerally in a suspension at a density of 2 x 10s cells per 2 41 injection. Delivery may 33 be achieved in Ham's F-10 medium with the use of a fine glass pipette with internal diameter of about 75-150 gm. Injections are to be delivered into the dorso-temporal subretinal space of one eye of anesthetized 23-day old, dystrophic-pigmented RCS rats, at a time before functional deterioration and significant photoreceptor death. 5 Sham-injected rats receive carrier medium alone without hES-derived cells. Histological assessment of postoperative rats may be done at shorter time points (e.g., at 1 month post-operatively) to assess short-term changes associated with transplantation and at longer time points (e.g., at 5 months post-operatively) to examine donor cell survival. Cells may be tagged or labeled by culturing in medium 10 containing 20 pLm BrdUrd for 48 hours before transplantation. Functional assessment of transplanted hfES-derived cells Also described in Lund et al. (2001) Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9942-47, behavioral assessment of grafted rats may be performed with a head-tracking apparatus that consists of a circular drum rotating at a constant velocity of 12 15 degrees/sec around a stationary holding chamber containing the animal. Presenting stimuli may be placed on interchangeable panels covered with black and white stripes with varying spatial frequencies such as 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 cycles per degree. Animals may be tested at 10-20 weeks postoperatively. All animal assessments may be conducted blindly by a sole operator. Behavioral data may be analyzed using 20 ANOVA. Physiological studies may be conducted on animals with corneal electrocardiograms (ERGs) at 60 and 90 days. Prior to testing, the rats are to be adapted to the dark overnight and anesthetized under red light with ketamine and xylazine. See, for example, Peachy et al., Vis Neurosci. 2002 Nov-Dec;19(6):693 25 701. The pupils are to be dilated and ERGs recorded from the comea with a cotton wick saline electrode. Subcutaneous 30-gauge needles may be inserted into the forehead and trunk as reference and ground electrodes, respectively. While maintaining the subject rat body temperature at 35-36*C, a light stimulus is to be applied at a maximum flash intensity measured at the cornea of about 0.7 x 103 30 pW/cm 2 . Responses are to be recorded and averaged by a computerized data acquisition system at varying frequencies. ERG amplitudes are to be measured from the initial negative peak of the a-wave or from the baseline to the positive peak of the b-wave. 34 As in Lund et al. (2001) Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9942-47, threshold responses to illumination of visual receptive fields from the superior colliculus at 100 days are to be recorded. Animals are to be placed under terminal urethane anesthesia (1.25 g/kg i.p.). Data is to be collected over the entire visual field at independent 5 points spaced roughly 200 Am apart, with each point corresponding to about 10-15* displacements in the visual field. Visual thresholds are to be measured as the increase in intensity over background and maintained at 0.02 cd/m 2 [at least 2.6 logarithm (log) units below rod saturation] for activating units in the superficial 200 pm of the superior colliculus with a spot light of 3* diameter. Threshold maps are to be 10 generated for each animal and illustrated as retinal representations. Seven eyes transplanted with RPE cells derived from an H9 cell line and six eyes transplanted with RPE cells derived from a Ji cell line were subjected to ERG analysis. RPE transplants were conducted with 23 day old rats, and ERG analysis was done 36 days following transplantation. The H9 group yielded uniformly good 15 responses, while the J1 group yielded 1 animal with only minimal response. Histological analysis of transplanted cells As described in Lund et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9942-47, animals are to be subjected to histological analysis. Animals may be euthanized with 20 Euthanal and perfused transcardially with PBS following by periodate-lysine paraformaldehyde (PLP). Eyes are to be sectioned and stained with cresyl violet. Eyes from animals of the BrdU group are to be labeled with anti-BrdUrd antibody and visualized with the use of an appropriate secondary antibody and respective reagents. Other eyes may be fixed by injection with 2.5% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% 25 glutaraldehyde, and 0.01% picric acid in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Eyes may be postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, and subsequently dehydrated through graded alcohol to epoxypropane. Tissue may be embedded in resin from which semi-thin sections may be cut and stained with toluidine blue in 1% borate buffer. 30 Example 12 Use of stem cell derived neural progenitor cells for the treatment of retinal degeneration 35 Generation of neural progenitors hES cells (e.g. H I, H7 and H9, National Institutes of Health - registered as WA01, WA07 and WA09) are allowed to overgrow on MEF medium (high glucose DMEM, supplemented with 2 mM GlutaMAX I or glutamine, and 500 u/nl 5 penicillin, 500 pg/ml streptomycin (antibiotics optional) (all from Invitrogen) and 15% FCS (can range from 8% to 20%) (HyClone)) or on extracellular matrix. And after one week or longer after passaging, the hES cells are split with trypsin , collagenase or dispase, or a combination of the two latter enzymes, and plated on gelatin in EB medium (see Example 11). The medium is changed as it gets yellow, 10 usually every 2-4 days. The majority of the cells growing under these conditions are positive as neural progenitors because they express nestin and/or tubulin beta III and have typical appearance of neural progenitor cells -- elongated spindle-like cells. They can be passaged again under the same conditions, which leads to enrichment of the cell population with nestin- and tubulin beta III-positive cells. RT-PCR is used 15 to confirm the presence of nestin, Pax6, N-CAM, tubulin beta III in such cultures. Alternatively, spheroids forming in differentiating cultures of hES cells can be removed and plated onto cell culture dishes (could be coated with gelatin or another extracellular matrix, permitting the formation of the described cell type) in EB medium, or such spheroids could form after the first passage of the total population of 20 differentiating hES cells and can be approached in the same way. Within a few days, growth of spindle-like cells is noticed, which can later be expanded and express the above mentioned markers for neural progenitor cells. Differentiation of ocular tissues from hES cells Differentiation conditions as described in Example 11 of hES cells allow for 25 the appearance of rod and cone-like structures as shown by histological examination of differentiating cultures (Figure 9a) and by RT-PCR analysis, which confirms expression of rhodopsin, opsin 5, opsin 1, and recoverin (Figures 9b, 9c and 9d). We also show that such cultures may contain corneal cells, as RT-PCR detected keratin 12, a corneal marker (Figure 9e). 30 Other Embodiments 36 From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that variations and modifications may be made to the invention described herein to adopt it to various usages and conditions. 37
Claims (34)
1. A composition comprising isolated human RPE cells obtained by in vitro differentiation of human pluripotent cells that express Oct-4, alkaline phosphatase, 5 SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-I-60, and TRA-I-81.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein said composition comprises a purified preparation of human RPE cells. 10
3. The composition of claim I or claim 2, wherein said composition substantially lacks any human pluripotent cells.
4. The composition of any one of claims 1-3, further comprising a substrate or matrix on which said human RPE cells are disposed. 15
5. The composition of claim 4, wherein the substrate or matrix is coated with at least one of gelatin, fibronectin, laminin, collagen, or extracellular matrix.
6. The composition of claim 4, wherein the substrate or matrix is plastic, or 20 comprises a coated or uncoated filter or bead.
7. The composition of any one of claims 1-6, wherein said composition is suitable for transplantation into a human patient. 25
8. The composition of any one of claims 1-7, wherein said composition is suitable for injection into a human patient.
9. The composition of claim 1, wherein said composition comprises a culture of human RPE cells. 30
10. The composition of claim 9, further comprising a substrate or matrix on which said culture of human RPE cells are disposed. -39
11. The composition of claim 1, which comprises a p0 (primary) culture of human RPE cells.
12. The composition of any one of claims 1-6, wherein said composition is 5 cryopreserved.
13. The composition of claim 12, wherein, upon thawing, said human RPE cells are suitable for transplantation or injection into a human patient. 10
14. The composition of any one of claims 1-13, wherein said human RPE cells exhibit a cobblestone, epithelial-like, polygonal appearance.
15. The composition of any one of claims 1-14, wherein the human RPE cells are present in a monolayer. 15
16. The composition of claim 15, wherein said monolayer comprises tightly packed cells.
17. The composition of any one of claims 1-16, wherein said human RPE cells 20 comprise cells having brown pigment dispersed within their cytoplasm.
18. The composition of any one of claims 1-17, wherein said human RPE cells express CRALBP, PEDF, RPE65 and bestrophin. 25
19. The composition of any one of claims 1-18, wherein said human RPE cells comprise Pax6+ cells.
20. The composition of any one of claims 1-18, wherein said human RPE cells comprise Pax6- cells. 30
21. The composition of any one of claims 1-18, wherein said human RPE cells comprise Pax6+ cells and Pax6- cells. -40
22. The composition of any one of claims 1-21, which comprises a pure population of human RPE cells.
23. A method for treating an individual in need thereof comprising transplanting or 5 injecting into the eye of said individual a composition of any one of claims 1-22.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein said human RPE cells are disposed on a substrate or matrix. 10
25. A method of treating or preventing a retinal disease or condition, comprising transplanting or injecting a composition of any one of claims 1-22 into a human patient in need thereof.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein said retinal disease or condition is a disease of 15 retinal degeneration.
27. The method of claim 25, wherein the retinal disease or condition comprises retinitis pigmentosa, RPE detachment, retinal dysplasia, retinal atrophy, retinopathy, macular dystrophy, cone dystrophy, cone-rod dystrophy, Malattia Leventinese, Doyne 20 honeycomb dystrophy, Sorsby's dystrophy, Stargardt disease, pattern/butterfly dystrophies, Best vitelliform dystrophy, North Carolina dystrophy, central areolar choroidal dystrophy, angioid streaks, or a toxic maculopathy.
28. The method of claim 27, wherein the retinal disease or condition is macular 25 degeneration.
29. The method of claim 28, wherein said macular degeneration is age-related.
30. The method of any one of claims 25-29, wherein said method comprises 30 transplanting said composition into an eye of said individual.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein said composition comprises human RPE cells in a suspension, in a substrate, or on a matrix. -41
32. The method of claim 30, which comprises transplantation of the cell by vitrectomy surgery into the subretinal space of the eye of said individual. 5
33. Use of a composition of any one of claims 1-22 for the manufacture of a medicament for treating or preventing a retinal disease or condition, wherein the medicament is adapted for transplantation or injection.
34. A composition of claim 1; a method of claim 23 or claim 25; or use of claim 33, 10 substantially as herein described with reference to any one or more of the examples but excluding comparative examples.
75820.006031 EMF_US 45126136vI
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2012201562A AU2012201562B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2012-03-15 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
AU2013267025A AU2013267025B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2013-11-28 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
AU2017200473A AU2017200473B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2017-01-24 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
AU2018282333A AU2018282333A1 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2018-12-19 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
AU2021200383A AU2021200383A1 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2021-01-21 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US60/538,964 | 2004-01-23 | ||
AU2005325753A AU2005325753B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2005-07-20 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
AU2012201562A AU2012201562B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2012-03-15 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2005325753A Division AU2005325753B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2005-07-20 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2013267025A Division AU2013267025B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2013-11-28 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2012201562A1 AU2012201562A1 (en) | 2012-04-05 |
AU2012201562B2 true AU2012201562B2 (en) | 2013-07-04 |
Family
ID=46607122
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2012201562A Expired AU2012201562B2 (en) | 2004-01-23 | 2012-03-15 | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU2012201562B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP4051785A1 (en) * | 2019-10-30 | 2022-09-07 | Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine | Methods for producing retinal pigment epithelium cells |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030087859A1 (en) * | 2001-02-21 | 2003-05-08 | Stefan Kochanek | Pigment epithelial cell of the eye, its production and use in therapy of an eye or CNS disease |
-
2012
- 2012-03-15 AU AU2012201562A patent/AU2012201562B2/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030087859A1 (en) * | 2001-02-21 | 2003-05-08 | Stefan Kochanek | Pigment epithelial cell of the eye, its production and use in therapy of an eye or CNS disease |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
HIRANO, M. et al. DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS, 2003, vol. 228, no. 4, pp. 664-671 * |
Kawasaki, H. et al. 2002 PNAS. vol 99, no. 3, pp. 1580-1585 * |
Ooto, S. et al. 2003 Invest. Ophthalmol.Vis. Sci. vol. 44, pp. 2689-2693 * |
SCHRAERMEYER, U. et al. CELL TRANSPLANTATION 2001, Vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 673-80 * |
YING, O-L. et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 183-186 * |
ZHAO, X. et al. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, vol. 297, no. 2, pp. 177-184 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2012201562A1 (en) | 2012-04-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9730962B2 (en) | Modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina | |
AU2005325753B2 (en) | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina | |
US20240131077A1 (en) | Modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina | |
AU2021200383A1 (en) | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina | |
AU2012201562B2 (en) | Improved modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina | |
US20240174978A1 (en) | Modalities for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the retina |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
PC | Assignment registered |
Owner name: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Free format text: FORMER OWNER(S): ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE |
|
MK14 | Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired |