[go: up one dir, main page]

login
Revision History for A307703 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing all changes.
Highly powerful numbers (A005934) that are not cubeful (A036966).
(history; published version)
#5 by N. J. A. Sloane at Tue May 07 15:17:43 EDT 2019
STATUS

proposed

approved

#4 by Amiram Eldar at Mon Apr 22 14:58:34 EDT 2019
STATUS

editing

proposed

#3 by Amiram Eldar at Mon Apr 22 14:52:21 EDT 2019
NAME

allocated for Amiram EldarHighly powerful numbers (A005934) that are not cubeful (A036966).

DATA

4, 144, 288, 86400, 129600, 194400, 259200, 518400, 190512000, 317520000, 381024000, 635040000, 9681819840000, 215982036990720000, 9466852651364908800000, 14200278977047363200000, 28400557954094726400000, 174294224164279335916800000, 522882672492838007750400000

OFFSET

1,1

COMMENTS

Lacampagne and Selfridge proved that these are the only terms.

The positions of the terms in A005934 are 2, 8, 10, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 55, 58, 60, 62, 107, 161, 230, 234, 240, 302, 315.

LINKS

Carole B. Lacampagne and John L. Selfridge, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1984-0740165-6">Large highly powerful numbers are cubeful</a>, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 91, No. 2 (1984), pp. 173-181.

MATHEMATICA

pmax = 1; s = {}; Do[e = FactorInteger[n][[;; , 2]]; p = Times @@ e; If[p > pmax, pmax = p; If[Min[e] < 3, AppendTo[s, n]]], {n, 2, 10^6}]; s

CROSSREFS
KEYWORD

allocated

nonn,fini,full

AUTHOR

Amiram Eldar, Apr 22 2019

STATUS

approved

editing

Discussion
Mon Apr 22
14:58
Amiram Eldar: With 261 characters, the full sequence perfectly fits the data section. Which is better: "cubeful" (as in the paper's title) or "cubefull" (as in A036966)?
#2 by Amiram Eldar at Mon Apr 22 14:52:21 EDT 2019
NAME

allocated for Amiram Eldar

KEYWORD

recycled

allocated

#1 by Russ Cox at Sun Jan 27 08:30:53 EST 2019
KEYWORD

recycled

STATUS

approved