[go: up one dir, main page]

login
Revision History for A264951 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Amicable digital numbers.
(history; published version)
#22 by N. J. A. Sloane at Sat Jan 02 04:32:18 EST 2016
STATUS

proposed

approved

#21 by Omar E. Pol at Tue Dec 29 07:32:35 EST 2015
STATUS

editing

proposed

#20 by Omar E. Pol at Tue Dec 29 07:32:09 EST 2015
COMMENTS

For amicable digital pairs see A262615 and also A264958.

STATUS

proposed

editing

#19 by Omar E. Pol at Tue Dec 29 07:21:11 EST 2015
STATUS

editing

proposed

#18 by Omar E. Pol at Tue Dec 29 07:17:41 EST 2015
COMMENTS

Union of AA262091 A262091 and A262092.

For more information see A262091.

REFERENCES

K. Oséki, A problem of number theory, Proceedings of the Japan Academy 36 (1960), 578-587.

Discussion
Tue Dec 29
07:19
Omar E. Pol: Added more info.
07:21
Omar E. Pol: A code and an example could be added by an OEIS editor or seqfan.
#17 by Omar E. Pol at Tue Dec 29 07:15:22 EST 2015
COMMENTS

Union of AA262091 and A262092.

CROSSREFS

Cf. A262615, A264958. Also, union of A262091 and A262092.

Cf. A262091, A262092, A262615, A264958.

#16 by G. C. Greubel at Tue Dec 29 01:11:10 EST 2015
STATUS

proposed

editing

#15 by Omar E. Pol at Sun Dec 27 20:25:03 EST 2015
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Tue Dec 29
01:11
G. C. Greubel: Code or an example might help. Also the comment of what an amicable digital number could be added back in with some refinement.
#14 by Omar E. Pol at Sun Dec 27 20:22:05 EST 2015
KEYWORD

nonn,base,more,changed

#13 by Omar E. Pol at Sun Dec 27 20:21:52 EST 2015
COMMENTS

Numbers of A264958 in increasing order.

First differs from A264958 at a(8).