reviewed

approved

proposed

reviewed

editing

proposed

It appears that if n is in the sequence then 2n is too. _. [_Ralf Stephan_, May 16 2013]

proposed

editing

editing

proposed

It appears that if n is in the sequence then 2n is too. Ralf Stephan, May 16 2013

approved

editing

_N. J. A. Sloane (njas(AT)research.att.com), _, May 19 2002

OEIS Server: https://oeis.org/edit/global/110

nonn,new

nonn

N. J. A. Sloane (njas, (AT)research.att.com), May 19 2002

A070871(n) > n.

5, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 57, 58, 68, 69, 70, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 105, 106, 107

1,1

nonn

njas, May 19 2002

approved