[go: up one dir, main page]

login
Revision History for A035287 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Number of ways to place a non-attacking white and black rook on n X n chessboard.
(history; published version)
#126 by Alois P. Heinz at Tue Feb 28 09:42:13 EST 2023
COMMENTS

The nontrivial squares of the form a + 2b + c where a, b and c are consecutive numbers in consecutive bases: (4 + 8 + 8 + 16 = 36, 9 + 27 + 27 + 81 = 144). - Steve Homewood, Feb 11 2023

STATUS

proposed

approved

#125 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Sat Feb 11 15:49:21 EST 2023
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Sat Feb 11
15:52
Jon E. Schoenfield: By “consecutive numbers in consecutive bases”, do you mean consecutive powers of a given base? I’m having trouble understanding the wording used in the Comments entry.
15:57
Andrew Howroyd: I can't see this as anything other than an incomprehensible transcription of the first formula. n^2*(n-1)^2  or b^2*(1 + 2*b + b^2) where b = n-1. I suggest to reject.
16:01
Jon E. Schoenfield: Yes, I was about to ask: Is it true that your variables a, b, and c are given by a = (n-1)^2, b = (n-1)^3, and c= (n-1)^4, so the n-th term of the sequence is a + 2b + c = ((n-1) + (n-1)^2)^2 = ((n-1)*(1+(n-1)))^2 = ((n-1)*(1+n-1))^2 = ((n-1)*n)^2?
16:02
Jon E. Schoenfield: But Andrew beat me to it (and put it much better than I did).
16:03
Steve Homewood: Consecutive powers is a lot more clearer. Taking a + 2b + c where a,b and c are consecutive powers then the square of any base added to twice the cube plus the fourth power is always a square number and those squares are in this sequence, 36, 144, 400, 900.....
16:03
Jon E. Schoenfield: I’m sorry, but I have to agree that this proposed Comments entry should be rejected. :-(
16:07
Steve Homewood: Ok then, reject it.
Tue Feb 14
01:19
Jon E. Schoenfield: Do any other editors want to weigh in?
#124 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Sat Feb 11 15:49:18 EST 2023
COMMENTS

The nontrivial squares of the form a + 2b + c where a, b and c are consecutive numbers in consecutive bases:- (4 + 8 + 8 + 16 = 36, 9 + 27 + 27 + 81 = 144). - Steve Homewood, Feb 11 2023

#123 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Sat Feb 11 15:47:50 EST 2023
COMMENTS

The non-trivial nontrivial squares of the form a + 2b + c where a,b and c are consecutive numbers in consecutive bases:- (4 + 8 + 8 + 16 = 36, 9 + 27 + 27 + 81 = 144). - Steve Homewood, Feb 11 2023

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Sat Feb 11
15:48
Jon E. Schoenfield: Spelling corrected per the OEIS Style Sheet; for more information, see https://oeis.org/wiki/Style_Sheet#Spelling_and_notation
#122 by Andrew Howroyd at Sat Feb 11 15:23:08 EST 2023
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Sat Feb 11
15:25
Andrew Howroyd: (i see that they are 3^2, 3^3, 3^4, but why is this as described?)
15:41
Steve Homewood: 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^3 + 2^4 = 36, 3^2 + 3^3 + 3^3 + 3^4 = 144, base 2 and base 3 consecutively. 4^2 + 4^3 + 4^3 + 4^4 = 400 and 5^2 + 5^3 + 5^3 + 5^4 = 900, in base 4 and base 5. The rest of the numbers are produced for base 6, base 7, base 8, base 9, base 10 ad infinitum.
#121 by Andrew Howroyd at Sat Feb 11 15:21:51 EST 2023
COMMENTS

The non-trivial squares of the form a + 2b + c where a,b and c are consecutive numbers in consecutive bases:- (4 + 8 + 8 + 16 = 36, 9 + 27 + 27 + 81 = 144) _. - _Steve Homewood_, Feb 11 2023

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Sat Feb 11
15:23
Andrew Howroyd: I don't quite follow why 9, 27, 81 are consecutive numbers in consecutive bases.
#120 by Steve Homewood at Sat Feb 11 15:17:38 EST 2023
STATUS

editing

proposed

#119 by Steve Homewood at Sat Feb 11 15:16:55 EST 2023
COMMENTS

The non-trivial squares of the form a + 2b + c where a,b and c are consecutive numbers in consecutive bases:- (4 + 8 + 8 + 16 = 36, 9 + 27 + 27 + 81 = 144) _Steve Homewood_, Feb 11 2023

#118 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Sat Feb 11 15:03:47 EST 2023
STATUS

proposed

editing

#117 by Steve Homewood at Fri Feb 10 19:01:41 EST 2023
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Sat Feb 11
15:03
Jon E. Schoenfield: Your signature format is incorrect. Please see https://oeis.org/wiki/Style_Sheet#Signing_your_name_when_you_contribute_to_an_existing_sequence