OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Equivalently a(n) is the greatest runlength in all n-sections of the infinite Fibonacci word A003849.
From Jeffrey Shallit, Mar 23 2021: (Start)
We know that the Fibonacci word has exactly n+1 distinct factors of length n.
So to verify a(n) we simply verify there is a monochromatic arithmetic progression of length a(n) and difference n by examining all factors of length (n*a(n) - n + 1) (and we know when we've seen all of them). Next we verify there is no monochromatic AP of length a(n)+1 and difference n by examining all factors of length n*a(n) + 1.
Again, we know when we've seen all of them. (End)
LINKS
Jeffrey Shallit, Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..231
D. Badziahin and J. Shallit, Badly approximable numbers, Kronecker's theorem, and diversity of Sturmian characteristic sequences, arXiv:2006.15842 [math.NT], 2020.
EXAMPLE
For n >= 1, r = 0..n, k >= 0, let A014675(n*k+r) denote the k-th term of the r-th n-section of A014675; i.e.,
(A014675(k)) = 212212122122121221212212212122122121221212212212122121...
has runlengths 1,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,2,1,...; a(1) = 2.
(A014675(2k)) = 22112211222122212221122112221222122211221122112221222...
has runlengths 2,2,2,2,3,1,3,1,3,2,...
(A014675(2k+1)) = 122212221122112211222122211221122112221222122211221...
has runlengths 1,3,1,3,2,2,2,2,2,3,...; a(2) = 3.
(A014675(3k)) = 22111222211122221122222112222211222211122221112222111...
has runlengths 2,3,4,3,4,2,5,2,5,2,4,3,4,3,...
(A014675(3k+1)) = 112222111222211122221112222111222211222221122221112...
has runlengths 2,4,3,4,3,4,3,4,3,4,,5,2,4,3,...
(A014675(3k+2)) = 222211222221122221112222111222211122221112222112222...
has runlengths 4,2,5,2,4,3,4,3,4,3,4,3,4,2,...; a(3) = 5.
MATHEMATICA
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Clark Kimberling, Dec 26 2020
EXTENSIONS
a(61) corrected by Jeffrey Shallit, Mar 23 2021
STATUS
approved