The constant in the Laurent series
(1)
|
of about a point is called the residue of . If is analytic at , its residue is zero, but the converse is not always true (for example, has residue of 0 at but is not analytic at ). The residue of a function at a point may be denoted . The residue is implemented in the Wolfram Language as Residue[f, z, z0].
Two basic examples of residues are given by and for .
The residue of a function around a point is also defined by
(2)
|
where is counterclockwise simple closed contour, small enough to avoid any other poles of . In fact, any counterclockwise path with contour winding number 1 which does not contain any other poles gives the same result by the Cauchy integral formula. The above diagram shows a suitable contour for which to define the residue of function, where the poles are indicated as black dots.
It is more natural to consider the residue of a meromorphic one-form because it is independent of the choice of coordinate. On a Riemann surface, the residue is defined for a meromorphic one-form at a point by writing in a coordinate around . Then
(3)
|
The sum of the residues of is zero on the Riemann sphere. More generally, the sum of the residues of a meromorphic one-form on a compact Riemann surface must be zero.
The residues of a function may be found without explicitly expanding into a Laurent series as follows. If has a pole of order at , then for and . Therefore,
(4)
| |||
(5)
|
Multiplying both sides by gives
(6)
|
Take the first derivative and reindex,
(7)
| |||
(8)
| |||
(9)
|
Take the second derivative and reindex,
(10)
| |||
(11)
| |||
(12)
|
Iterating then gives
(13)
| |||
(14)
|
So
(15)
| |||
(16)
|
since , and the residue is
(17)
|
The residues of a holomorphic function at its poles characterize a great deal of the structure of a function, appearing for example in the amazing residue theorem of contour integration.