
Michael Talbot
Related Authors
Katherine Butler Schofield
King's College London
Ruben López-Cano
Escola Superior de Música de Catalunya
Egil Bakka
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Katelijne Schiltz
Universität Regensburg
Luca Della Libera
Conservatorio di Musica 'Licinio Refice' - Frosinone
Javier Marín-López
Universidad de Jaén
Francesco Zimei
University of Trento
Arturo Tello Ruiz-Pérez
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Karina Zybina
Uppsala University
Alejandro L. Madrid
Harvard University
InterestsView All (12)
Uploads
Books by Michael Talbot
Michael Talbot
Taking as its main points of reference the “Manchester” violin sonatas of Vivaldi (c. 1726) and the Trattenimenti armonici per camera, Op. 6 (c. 1712), of Albinoni, the paper argues that the highly variable nature of movements bearing a given dance title in the Italian sonata of the late Baroque cannot be fully explained by the traditional reference to their “stylization” or “idealization”. The adoption of binary form also by abstract movements during the seventeenth century, a trend that gathered momentum after 1700, created a borderland in which the composer had a degree of choice in deciding whether to use, or not to use, dance titles. The “Manchester” sonatas employ dance titles even in cases where the title has clearly been added post factum. The Trattenimenti armonici, in contrast, do not use them even when a clear dance character is present.
To explain this apparently contradictory situation, the concept of “stylised” dances needs to be complemented by another concept: that of using dance titles as “paratexts” (a term coined by the French literary theorist Gérard Genette). A paratext is a description external to the text proper that aims to guide the reception of the piece by the consumer (which in music embraces both the executant and the listener). Because of the association of the “standard” dances (allemanda, corrente, sarabanda, giga, gavotta) with the courtly lifestyle, the inclination among composers was to retain or invent dance titles for music destined for a courtly milieu. Conversely, for music aimed at a bourgeois market or intended for possible performance in church, dance titles were less appropriate.
The paper ends with the reflection that Genette’s concept of the paratext, which has an obvious connection to Jeffrey Kallberg’s idea of the “generic contract”, has wide relevance to the study of music.
VIVALDI, ORLANDINI AND A MANUSCRIPT IN SKARA
Summary
The municipal library, called Stifts- och Landsbiblioteket, in the small Swedish town of Skara holds a large collection of ‘loose’ arias from the eighteenth century grouped under the generic shelfmark “494”. These were collected by Swedish visitors to Italy as souvenirs of their travels and in some instances for practical use back home. One such item, occupying a single gathering of four folios, is no. 494:62, which contains two arias for tenor: (1) the aria “Cada pur sul capo audace”, attributed in the manuscript correctly to Vivaldi and copied in the hand of Scribe 2 (in Paul Everett’s classification); (2) an anonymous aria (copied in short score by a different hand), “Fu del re comando allora”, which turns out to be by Giuseppe Maria Orlandini and is listed in the Ryom catalogue as RV Anh. 59:14. This pair of arias was probably purchased in Venice during the carnival season of 1718. “Cada pur” belongs to Artabano, re de’ Parti (RV 706-B), “Fu del re” to Orlandini’s Antigona.
The article discusses the music of both arias in the context of their parent works, correcting certain misconceptions that have arisen about the respective productions. Vivaldi’s aria is categorized as not merely an aria all’unisono but also (largely by virtue of that feature) a ‘variable-register’ aria capable of being sung without transposition of the instrumental accompaniment by singers belonging to different voice types. This flexibility was evidently one of the reasons behind its frequent recycling. For Orlandini’s aria, the discussion centres on that composer’s musical language. The special role of short scores (often with their instrumental ritornellos excised) in the extension of operatic music to the private, domestic sphere is acknowledged, and to some extent justified. Finally, the article provides new information on Orlandini’s librettist, Benedetto Pasqualigo (1673-1743) and his drama Antigona .
The complete volume of Studi vivaldiani, 19 (2019), where this article is published on pp. 51-64, is downloadable from <https://www.cini.it/pubblicazioni/studi-vivaldiani-19-2019>.
The justification for the attribution of RV 827 to Vivaldi is made primarily on general stylistic grounds, reinforced by a few instances of thematic concordance with actual works by him and certain notational similarities. The opportunity is also taken to introduce the work by analysing its form and evaluating its aesthetic qualities. It appears to date from the early 1730s and to have no connection with the Ospedale della Pietà. As one of the longest and most complex single-movement psalm settings to come from Vivaldi’s pen, it constitutes an interesting and valuable addition to his catalogue. It has very recently been published in the Critical Edition of Vivaldi's works.
There are strong arguments for believing that these trios were sent to Venice by Telemann in 1716-17 for the use of the elite group of Dresden musicians serving the visiting electoral prince. During much of 1717 the group’s violinist, Johann Pisendel, was absent on a study and music-collecting tour of Italy, so it is possible that Antonio Vivaldi deputized for the absent virtuoso – which would explain G. B. Vivaldi’s involvement as a copyist. Alternatively, G. B. Vivaldi could have executed the task as a favour to Pisendel, a pupil and friend of his father.
The apparent genre designation “concerto” chosen for these trios by Telemann raises the possibility of a musical connection to Vivaldi’s concertos without orchestra, the historical connection of which with the visit of the Saxons is generally recognized. However, Telemann’s choice of this title appears rather capricious and unrelated to any concerto-like features, whereas Vivaldi’s chamber concertos are genuine translations of the concerto idiom into a new medium. Although Telemann’s titles may have stimulated Vivaldi’s imagination, the musical character of his pieces seems to have left no mark on his Venetian colleague.
Finally, the relationship of Vivaldi’s chamber concertos to the so-called quadri of Telemann and other Germans is re-examined. It appears that during the 1710s Telemann and Vivaldi moved along parallel but non-convergent tracks in their creation of music for ‘mixed’ instrumental chamber ensembles: despite some surface similarities, the two genres did not influence one another in any direct way.
The full article (Studi vivaldiani, 15 (2015), pp. 55-72) can be downloaded from the page <www.cini.it/publications/studi-vivaldiani-15-2015>.
Papers by Michael Talbot
Michael Talbot
Taking as its main points of reference the “Manchester” violin sonatas of Vivaldi (c. 1726) and the Trattenimenti armonici per camera, Op. 6 (c. 1712), of Albinoni, the paper argues that the highly variable nature of movements bearing a given dance title in the Italian sonata of the late Baroque cannot be fully explained by the traditional reference to their “stylization” or “idealization”. The adoption of binary form also by abstract movements during the seventeenth century, a trend that gathered momentum after 1700, created a borderland in which the composer had a degree of choice in deciding whether to use, or not to use, dance titles. The “Manchester” sonatas employ dance titles even in cases where the title has clearly been added post factum. The Trattenimenti armonici, in contrast, do not use them even when a clear dance character is present.
To explain this apparently contradictory situation, the concept of “stylised” dances needs to be complemented by another concept: that of using dance titles as “paratexts” (a term coined by the French literary theorist Gérard Genette). A paratext is a description external to the text proper that aims to guide the reception of the piece by the consumer (which in music embraces both the executant and the listener). Because of the association of the “standard” dances (allemanda, corrente, sarabanda, giga, gavotta) with the courtly lifestyle, the inclination among composers was to retain or invent dance titles for music destined for a courtly milieu. Conversely, for music aimed at a bourgeois market or intended for possible performance in church, dance titles were less appropriate.
The paper ends with the reflection that Genette’s concept of the paratext, which has an obvious connection to Jeffrey Kallberg’s idea of the “generic contract”, has wide relevance to the study of music.
VIVALDI, ORLANDINI AND A MANUSCRIPT IN SKARA
Summary
The municipal library, called Stifts- och Landsbiblioteket, in the small Swedish town of Skara holds a large collection of ‘loose’ arias from the eighteenth century grouped under the generic shelfmark “494”. These were collected by Swedish visitors to Italy as souvenirs of their travels and in some instances for practical use back home. One such item, occupying a single gathering of four folios, is no. 494:62, which contains two arias for tenor: (1) the aria “Cada pur sul capo audace”, attributed in the manuscript correctly to Vivaldi and copied in the hand of Scribe 2 (in Paul Everett’s classification); (2) an anonymous aria (copied in short score by a different hand), “Fu del re comando allora”, which turns out to be by Giuseppe Maria Orlandini and is listed in the Ryom catalogue as RV Anh. 59:14. This pair of arias was probably purchased in Venice during the carnival season of 1718. “Cada pur” belongs to Artabano, re de’ Parti (RV 706-B), “Fu del re” to Orlandini’s Antigona.
The article discusses the music of both arias in the context of their parent works, correcting certain misconceptions that have arisen about the respective productions. Vivaldi’s aria is categorized as not merely an aria all’unisono but also (largely by virtue of that feature) a ‘variable-register’ aria capable of being sung without transposition of the instrumental accompaniment by singers belonging to different voice types. This flexibility was evidently one of the reasons behind its frequent recycling. For Orlandini’s aria, the discussion centres on that composer’s musical language. The special role of short scores (often with their instrumental ritornellos excised) in the extension of operatic music to the private, domestic sphere is acknowledged, and to some extent justified. Finally, the article provides new information on Orlandini’s librettist, Benedetto Pasqualigo (1673-1743) and his drama Antigona .
The complete volume of Studi vivaldiani, 19 (2019), where this article is published on pp. 51-64, is downloadable from <https://www.cini.it/pubblicazioni/studi-vivaldiani-19-2019>.
The justification for the attribution of RV 827 to Vivaldi is made primarily on general stylistic grounds, reinforced by a few instances of thematic concordance with actual works by him and certain notational similarities. The opportunity is also taken to introduce the work by analysing its form and evaluating its aesthetic qualities. It appears to date from the early 1730s and to have no connection with the Ospedale della Pietà. As one of the longest and most complex single-movement psalm settings to come from Vivaldi’s pen, it constitutes an interesting and valuable addition to his catalogue. It has very recently been published in the Critical Edition of Vivaldi's works.
There are strong arguments for believing that these trios were sent to Venice by Telemann in 1716-17 for the use of the elite group of Dresden musicians serving the visiting electoral prince. During much of 1717 the group’s violinist, Johann Pisendel, was absent on a study and music-collecting tour of Italy, so it is possible that Antonio Vivaldi deputized for the absent virtuoso – which would explain G. B. Vivaldi’s involvement as a copyist. Alternatively, G. B. Vivaldi could have executed the task as a favour to Pisendel, a pupil and friend of his father.
The apparent genre designation “concerto” chosen for these trios by Telemann raises the possibility of a musical connection to Vivaldi’s concertos without orchestra, the historical connection of which with the visit of the Saxons is generally recognized. However, Telemann’s choice of this title appears rather capricious and unrelated to any concerto-like features, whereas Vivaldi’s chamber concertos are genuine translations of the concerto idiom into a new medium. Although Telemann’s titles may have stimulated Vivaldi’s imagination, the musical character of his pieces seems to have left no mark on his Venetian colleague.
Finally, the relationship of Vivaldi’s chamber concertos to the so-called quadri of Telemann and other Germans is re-examined. It appears that during the 1710s Telemann and Vivaldi moved along parallel but non-convergent tracks in their creation of music for ‘mixed’ instrumental chamber ensembles: despite some surface similarities, the two genres did not influence one another in any direct way.
The full article (Studi vivaldiani, 15 (2015), pp. 55-72) can be downloaded from the page <www.cini.it/publications/studi-vivaldiani-15-2015>.
the movements have been taken from arias in two operas by Antonio Lotti, Giove in Argo (1717) and Ascanio (1718), written for performance in Dresden. The manner of conversion from aria to concerto movement is very simple, entailing the reassignment of the vocal line to oboe, lightening of the string accompaniment in some solo passages and
otherwise only minimal recomposition. Great care has been taken to match the movements to one another to create an instrumental pasticcio. The evidence that Lotti himself undertook the conversion is very strong, since his only other known solo concerto (for oboe d’amore, in A major) likewise uses da capo aria form for each movement, something previously not encountered in the genre. The identity of the performer for whom these concertos were written is considered, a likely candidate being
the Dresden oboist Johann Christian Richter, whom Lotti had probably first
encountered in Venice in 1716–1717.
Eiffert produced two published sets, each of six sonatas: the first for cello (1761) and the second for transverse flute (1769). Each is of remarkable musical quality, although neither collection exceeds the level of technical difficulty attained by average professional players or good amateurs. Eiffert masters sonata form (in its early incarnation) with confidence and a sure touch. Particularly impressive are his development sections, which mix development in the strict sense with attractive new material. This music, concurrently published by Edition HH (editionhh.co.uk), deserves exploration and a place in the early music repertoire.
An accompanying essay together with a thematic catalogue of Albicastro's sonatas for violin and basso continuo can be downloaded for free from the publisher's website. See http://www.editionhh.co.uk/ab_albicastro.htm
Details of the individual sonatas in this series are as follows:
‘London’ Sonata No. 1 in C minor
This sonata consists of four movements (slow – fast – slow – fast). The slow movements are lyrical, the fast movements energetically contrapuntal (in this instance, with hardly any recourse to double-stopping). Several hallmarks of Albicastro’s style are present, including suave Corellian counterpoint in the second movement (a canzona-type subject is pitted against an elaboration, mostly in semiquavers, of a ‘circle of fifths’-type progression), inter-movement quotation, and harmonic experimentation.
‘London’ Sonata No. 2 in B flat major
This sonata consists of four movements (slow – fast – slow – fast). The slow movements are lyrical, the fast movements brilliant, and clearly of Corellian inspiration (the second movement recalls the third of Sonata I from Corelli’s Op. 5). Especially characteristic of Albicastro is the extended third movement where there are modulations to various keys and prominent Neapolitan chords.
‘London’ Sonata No. 3 in F minor
This sonata consists of five movements, the first three of which are performed continuously, and culminates in a magnificent French- style ‘Passacala’ (Passacaglia). F minor is not a natural key for the violin, and some of the passage-work in semiquavers is challenging, but this sonata is arguably the most substantial and rewarding to play of the four ‘London’ works, both for the violinist and continuo.
'London' Sonata no. 4 in F major
This four-movement sonata exemplifies Albicastro’s mastery of the Corellian style. The first is a composite (Adagio-Presto-Adagio), with a Corellian opening gambit (the opening phrase is repeated a fourth lower) and a central section with allemanda-like figuration. Next is a movement in suave Corellian counterpoint, followed by an extended 3/2-time slow movement of common type in Albicastro’s sonatas (similar ones are included in two of the other ‘London’ sonatas and in the composer’s Op. 5). The final movement is giga-like, notated in common time, but performed as if in compound time.
'Leuven' Sonata in D minor
This unusually elaborate sonata survives uniquely in Leuven (Louvain), Belgium, where it forms part of the large Di Martinelli family archive. It has seven movements (or sections), of which the third and the seventh require the violinist to engage in complex double- stopping. Several features are old-fashioned for a composer of Albicastro’s generation, such as ‘solo’ sections involving rapid figuration over a slowly moving bass (II and V), and the reappearance of two portions in a transformed state (II/V and III/VII).
'Kilravock' Sonata in A minor (to be published in July 2016)
A manuscript of the present work was discovered recently in the collection of the Rose family, Lairds of Kilravock near Inverness; it has been copied in a late seventeenth- or early eighteenth-century hand and is inserted into a keyboard book of later date. Conceivably, it was brought to Scotland around the time of copying by a Scottish student returning from the University of Leiden. The sonata appears to be identical (although to what degree is uncertain) with the first of Albicastro’s Op. 9 published by Estienne Roger in 1706; the sole example of this print known to the editors is currently inaccessible. It has five movements, the second of which is noteworthy for its combination of polyphonic writing and brilliant passage-work. It is a fine example of Albicastro’s synthesis of the Corellian style with the polyphonic art of the south German school of violinists.