Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model

1. United Nations (2007) World population prospects: the 2006 revision-comprehensive tables. United Nations Publications, New York

   Google Scholar 

2. Pollack M (2005) Intelligent technology for an aging population: the use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI Mag 26(2):9–24

   Google Scholar 

3. Giuliani MS, Fornara F (2005) Coping strategies and technology in later life. In: Proceedings of AISB 2005, Hatfield

4. Zajicek M, Arnold A (1999) The ‘technology push’ and the user Tailored information environment. In: 5th European research consortium for informatics and mathematics, workshop on user interfaces for all

5. Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) The effectiveness of assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnol J 8(2):94–103

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Breazeal C (2003) Towards sociable robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3–4)

   Google Scholar 

7. Nomura T, Nakao A (2010) Comparison on identification of affective body motions by robots between elder people and university students: a case study in Japan. Int J Soc Robot 2(2):147–157

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manag Inf Syst Q

9. Graf B, Hans M, Schraft RD (2004) Care-O-bot II development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Auton Robots 16(2):193–205

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Yanco HA (2001) Development and testing of a robotic wheelchair system for outdoor navigation. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference of the rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology society of North America

11. Guizzo E, Goldstein H (2005) The rise of the body bots [robotic exoskeletons]. IEEE Spectr 42(10):50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Scanaill CN, Carew S, Barralon P, Noury N, Lyons D, Lyons GM (2006) A review of approaches to mobility telemonitoring of the elderly in their living environment. Ann Biomed Eng 34(4):547–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. DiSalvo C, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, Montgomery E, Yonkers W, Divine J (2003) The hug: an exploration of robotic form for intimate communication. In: RO-MAN 03

14. Beck A, Edwards N, Friedman B, Khan P (2003) Robotic pets and the elderly. Available from: http://www.ischool.washington.edu/robotpets/elderly/

15. Jung JW, Do JH, Kim YM, Suh KS, Kim DJ, Bien ZZ (2005) Advanced robotic residence for the elderly/the handicapped: realization and user evaluation. In: 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR)

16. Giuliani MV, Scopelliti M, Fornara F (2005) Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities. In: IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN 2005, pp 365–370

17. Cesta A, Cortellessa G, Pecora F, Rasconi R (2007) Supporting interaction in the robo care intelligent assistive environment. In: Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium on interaction challenges for intelligent assistants, pp 18–25

18. Pollack ME, Brown L, Colbry D, Orosz C, Peintner B, Ramakrishnan S, Engberg S, Matthews JT, Dunbar-Jacob J, McCarthy CE, Thrun S, Montemerlo M, Pineau J, Pearl NR (2002) A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. In: AAAI workshop on automation as eldercare

19. Shibata T, Wada K, Tanie K (2003) Statistical analysis and comparison of questionnaire results of subjective evaluations of seal robot in Japan and UK. In: Proceedings IROS 2003

20. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, televisions, and new media as real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

21. Stiehl WD, Lieberman J, Breazeal C, Basel L, Cooper R, Knight H, Lalla L, Maymin A, Purchase S (2006) The Huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective Touch. In: IEEE consumer communications and networking conference

22. Parlitz C, Baum W, Reiser U, Hagele M (2007) Intuitive human-machine-interaction and implementation on a household robot companion. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4557:922–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Bickmore T, Caruso L, Clough-Gorr K (2005) Acceptance and usability of a relational agent interface by urban older adults. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Portland, USA

24. Bickmore T, Schulman D (2006) The comforting presence of relational agents. In: Proceedings of CHI

25. Bartneck C, Reichenbach J, van Breemen AJN (2004) In your face, robot! The influence of a character’s embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions, design and emotion. In: Proceedings of the design and emotion 2004 conference, Ankara, Turkey

26. Shinozawa K, Naya F, Yamato J, Kogure K (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62(2):267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Fishbein M (1980) A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. Neb Symp Motiv 27:65–116

    Google Scholar 

28. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

29. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manag Inf Syst Q 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

30. de Ruyter B, Saini P, Markopoulos P, van Breemen AJN (2005) Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Soc Impact Emerg Technol 17(5):522–541

    Google Scholar 

31. Wu I-L, Chen J-L (2005) An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. Int J HCS 62(6)

32. Yang H, Yoo Y (2004) It’s all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis Support Syst 38(1):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Brown HG, Scott M, Deng PL, Forducey P (2005) Towards a sociability theory of computer anxiety: an interpersonal circumplex perspective. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences

34. Nomura T, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Kato K (2006) Measurement of anxiety toward robots. In: Proceedings RO-MAN

35. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 22:1111–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Chesney T (2006) An acceptance model for useful and fun information systems. Hum Technol 2(2):225–235

    Google Scholar 

37. Sun H, Zhang P (2006) Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: an alternative approach. J Assoc Inf Syst 7(9)

38. Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. Manag Inf Syst Q 28(4):695–704

    Google Scholar 

39. Heerink M, Kröse BJA, Wielinga BJ, Evers V (2008) Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In: Proceedings HRI 2008, Amsterdam, pp 113–120

40. Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3):225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Lombard M, Ditton TB (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J Comput-Mediat Commun 3(2). Available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html

42. Lee KM, Nass C (2003) Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI 2003

43. Heerink M, Kröse BJA, Wielinga BJ, Evers V (2008) The influence of social presence on enjoyment and intention to use of a robot and screen agent by elderly users. In: Proceedings RO-MAN, München

44. Bailenson JN, Blascovich J, Beall AC, Loomis JM (2001) Equilibrium revisited: mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 10:583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Heerink M, Kröse B, Wielinga B, Evers V (2009) Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users. In: Proceedings HCI 2009, Cambridge

46. Mitsunaga N, Miyashita Z, Shinozawa K, Miyashita T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2008) What makes people accept a robot in a social environment-discussion from six-week study in an office. In: IROS, Nice

47. Forlizzi J (2007) How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In: ACM SIGCHI/SIGART human-robot interaction, pp 129–136

48. Heerink M, Kröse BJA, Wielinga BJ, Evers V (2006) Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. Int J Assist Robot Mechatron 7(3):33–43

    Google Scholar 

49. Marsh S, Briggs P, Wagealla W (2004) Considering trust in ambient societies. In: Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on human factors and computing systems

50. Cody-Allen E, Kishore R (2006) An extension of the UTAUT model with e-quality, trust, and satisfaction constructs. ACM, New York

    Google Scholar 

51. Shinozawa K, Reeves B, Wise K, Lim S, Maldonado H, Naya F (2003) Robots as new media: a cross-cultural examination of social and cognitive responses to robotic and on-screen agents. In: Proceedings of the 53rd annual conference of the international communication association, information systems division, San Diego, CA, pp 998–1002

52. Camarinha-Matos LM, Afsarmanesh H (2002) Design of a virtual community infrastructure for elderly care. In: 3rd IFIP working conference on infrastructures for virtual enterprises. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

53. Pew R, Hemel SV (2004) Technology for adaptive aging. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

54. Forlizzi J, DiSalvo C, Gemperle F (2004) Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. J HCI, Special Issue on HRI 19(1/2):25–59

    Google Scholar 

55. van Breemen A, Yan X, Meerbeek B (2005) iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. In: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 143–144

56. Heerink M, Kröse BJA, Wielinga BJ, Evers V (2008) The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. J Phys Agents 2(2):33–40

    Google Scholar 

57. Bahadori S, Cesta A, Grisetti G, Iocchi L, Leone R, Nardi D, Oddi A, Pecora F, Rasconi R (2003) RoboCare: an integrated robotic system for the domestic care of the elderly. In: Proceedings of workshop on AI IA-03, Pisa, Italy

58. Woods S, Walters M, Koay KL Dautenhahn K (2006) Comparing human-robot interaction scenarios using live and video based methods: towards a novel methodological approach. In: Proceedings RO-MAN 2006, Hertfordshire

59. Heerink M (2009) Exploring adaptability, adaptivity and user control. Information Engineering Institute, Almere

    Google Scholar 

60. Heerink M, Kröse B, Wielinga B, Evers V Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit. In: Proceedings RO-MAN 2009, Toyama, Japan

61. Heerink M (2008) Evaluating steffie. Information Engineering Institute, Almere

    Google Scholar 

62. Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau M (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Struct Equ Model 4(7)

63. Tanaka JS (1987) “How big is big enough?”: sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. In: Child development, pp 134–146

64. Hayduk LA (1987) Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advances. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

65. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (1996) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

66. Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H (1999) Embodied presence in virtual environments. In: Visual representations and interpretations, pp 268–278

67. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice Hall International, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references