Abstract
The characteristics of steering perception are decisive factors for overall driver preference and for vehicle safety. Car manufacturers are continuously required to tune the characteristics of the vehicle and have a strong need to be more effective in the design and evaluation of cars. Using only objective metrics (OM) can result in unwanted steering feel and using only subjective assessments (SA) is time-consuming, costly and non-repetitive. Before a tool can be built to predict the steering feel in front-end development and to improve design knowledge from the full vehicle level to the component level, links between subjective assessments and objective metrics must be found and analysed. The data collected for the study presented in this paper include subjective ratings from expert drivers and objective measurements made with steering robots, involving twelve expert drivers and over twenty vehicles across four different vehicle classes. Linear regression and neural network analysis (NN) have been used to explore reliable subjective-objective links. The tools and methods used in this research showed promising results. Most of the links found concern response and torque feedback. The preferred ranges of some crucial objective metrics leading to more desirable steering feel have been defined and presented. The results indicate that it would be possible for car manufacturers to develop new vehicles more effectively with a steering feel in line with the design criteria by using the tools and methods investigated in this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ash, H. A. S. (2002). Correlation of Subjective and Objective Handling of Vehicle Behaviour. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Leeds. Leeds.
Bergman, W. (1973). Measurement and subjective evaluation of vehicle handling. Automobile Engineering Meeting. Detroit, Michigan, SAE Paper No. 730492.
Català, A., Hoppenot, S., Puig, J. and Waare, R. (2004). Objective laboratory and road methods for the evaluation of the performance of steering systems in passenger vehicles. 2004 FISITA World Automotive Cong. Barcelona, Spain, Sociedad de Tecnicos de Automocion.
Chatterjee, S. and Hadi, A. S. (2006). Regression Analysis by Example. 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New Jersey.
Chen, D. (1997). 627 Subjective and Objective Vehicle Handling Behaviour. Ph. D. Dissertaton. University of Leeds. Leeds.
Crolla, D. A., Chen, D. C., Whitehead, J. P. and Alstead, C. J. (1998). Vehicle handling assessment using a combined subjective-objective approach. Int. Cong. and Exposition. Detroit, SAE Paper No. 980226.
Data, S. and Frigerio, F. (2002). Objective evaluation of handling quality. J. Automobile Engineering 216, D4, 297–305.
Eduardo, G. D. P. (2011). Manual steering objective reference data definition based on subjective evaluation correlation. SAE BRASIL Int. Cong. and Exhibition. São Paulo, Brasil, SAE Paper No. 2011-36-0031.
Fadel, G., Haque, I., Blouin, V. and Wiecek, M. (2005). Multi-criteria multi-scenario approaches in the design of vehicles. 6th World Cong. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO6). Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Farrer, D. G. (1993). An objective measurement technique for the quantification of on-center handling quality. J. Passenger Cars, 102, 1271–1283.
Gang, C., Zhang, W., Zongyang, G. and Wei, S. (2009). A new approach to vehicle shift quality subjective evaluation based on fuzzy logic and evidence theory. 4th IEEE Conf. Industrial Electronics and Applications. Xi’an, China. IEEE.
Guo, K. H., Zong, C. F., Kong, F. S. and Chen, M. L. (2002). Objective evaluation correlated with human judgment — An approach to the optimization of vehicle handling control system. Int. J. Vehicle Design, 29, 96–111.
Harrer, M., Pfeffer, P. E. and Johnston, D. N. (2006). Steering feel — Objective assessment of passenger cars analysis of steering feel and vehicle handling. 2006 FISTA World Automotive Cong. Yokohama, Japan, SAE Paper No. 2006-05-0496.
Higuchi, A. and Sakai, H. (2001). Objective evaluation method of on-center handling characteristics. SAE World Cong. Detroit, Michigan, SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0481.
Jaksch, F. O. (1979). Driver-vehicle interaction with respect to steering controllability. Passenger Car Meeting, Dearborn, SAE Paper No. 790740.
Käppler, W. D., Godthelp, J., Randwijk, M. J. V. and Ruijs, P. A. J. (1992). Methodology for predicting car and truck handling assessments. FISTA XXIV Cong., IMechE, Paper 925044, C389/379. London.
King, R. P., Crolla, D. A., Ash, H. A. S. and Whitehead, J. (2002). Identification of subjective-objective vehicle handling links using neural networks for the foresight vehicle. SAE 2002 World Cong. Detroit, Michigan, March 4–7, 2002. SAE Paper No. 2002-01-1126.
List, H. O. and Schoeggl, P. (1998). Objective evaluation of vehicle driveability. Int. Cong. and Exposition. SAE Paper No. 980204.
Nuti, A. C. (2003). Objective metric x subjective evaluation. 12th Cong. Exposição Internacionais de Tecnologia da Mobilidade. São Paulo, Brasil, SAE Paper No. 2003-01-3723.
Rothhämel, M., IJkema, J. and Drugge, L. (2008). On the correlation between steering feel and handing in heavy trucks. FISITA World Automotive Cong. Munich, Germany, F2008-02-047.
Rothhämel, M., IJkema, J. and Drugge, L. (2010a). A method to find correlations between steering feel and vehicle handling properties using a moving base driving simulator. Vehicle System Dynamics 49, 12, 1837–1854.
Rothhämel, M., IJkema, J. and Drugge, L. (2010b). On a method for generating a word pool for the description of steering feel. 10th Int. Symp. Advanced Vehicle Control. Loughborough, UK.
Ruys, P. A. J. and Pauwelussen, J. P. (1989). TNO road vehicles research institute handling criteria for trucks. Int. Conf. Managing the Vehicle on the Road. London, UK, ARRB Group Limited.
Ryan, J. P., Fuia, S. P. and Schmid, H. A. (1997). Objective ride and handling goals for the 1997 Chevrolet Corvette. SAE Int. Cong. and Exposition. Warrendale. SAE Paper No. 970091.
Schoeggl, P., Kriegler, W. and Bogner, E. (2005). Virtual optimization of vehicle and powertrain parameters with consideration of human factors. SAE 2005 World Cong. Detroit, Michigan, SAE Paper No. 2005-01-1945.
Schoeggl, P. and Ramschak, E. (2000). Vehicle driveability assessment using neural networks for development, calibration and quality tests. SAE 2000 World Cong. Detroit, Michigan, SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0702.
Schoeggl, P., Ramschak, E. and Bogner, E. (2001). Onboard optimization of driveability character depending on driver style by using a new closed loop approach. SAE 2001 World Cong. Detroit, Michigan, SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0556.
Schweers, T. F. and Wallentowitz, H. (1994). Development of possible procedures for testing and rating of traction and stability control systems. Int. Symp. Advanced Vehicle Control. Tokyo. SAE Paper No. 948179.
Stumpf, H. W. (2001). Linking evaluation of subjective tire tests on the road with objectively measured data. Int. J. Automotive Technology 2, 1, 17–23.
Wolff, K., Kraaijeveld, R. and Hoppermans, J. (2008). Objective evaluation of subjective driving impressions. 2008 JSAE Annual Cong. Yokohama, SAE Paper No. 2008-08-0222.
Zschocke, A. K. and Albers, A. (2008). Links between subjective and objective evaluations regarding the steering character of automobiles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 9, 4, 473–481.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nybacka, M., He, X., Gómez, G. et al. Links between subjective assessments and objective metrics for steering. Int.J Automot. Technol. 15, 893–907 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0094-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0094-7