Abstract
The economy of China is growing rapidly. With this overwhelming growth, the country is experiencing a higher level of carbon emissions. Amid this backdrop, China is under immense pressure to reduce carbon emissions up to a sustainable level. This study adapted 31 provincial panel data from 2007 to 2017 using factor analysis system SBM-undesirable model to calculate the agro-ecological output of each province respectively and used a carbon transfer network impact analysis panel to calculate ecological performance impacts. Results show that (1) overall agro-ecological efficiency in China shows an upward trend but regional differences are evident. The efficiency in the eastern region is higher than that in the central and western regions but the extent of informatization in the central region is higher than that in the western region. (2) Informatization will significantly promote agro-ecological efficiency. (3) Changes in agricultural planting structure, agricultural value-added per capita, employment of human capital in the agricultural sector, and agricultural scale management are also important factors affecting agro-ecological growth. (4) China’s amount of carbon transfer is growing year by year, and energy-intensive areas and heavy industry bases are undertaking carbon transfer from the eastern coastal regions; (5) Jiangsu, Henan, and Hebei (Hubei) have the highest centers between 2007 and 2012; (6) inter-provincial carbon transmission is concentrated mainly in the metal smelting and rolling processing industries as well as in the coal, heat, and supply industries.


Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Change history
02 July 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14461-w
References
Adenuga AH, Davis J, Hutchinson G, Donnellan T, Patton M (2019) Environmental efficiency and pollution costs of nitrogen surplus in dairy farms: a parametric hyperbolic technology distance function approach. Environ Resour Econ 74:1273–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00367-2
Asbahi AAMHA, Gang FZ, Iqbal W et al (2019) Novel approach of principal component analysis method to assess the national energy performance via energy Trilemma Index. Energy Rep 5:704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.06.009
Brady M (2003) The relative cost-efficiency of arable nitrogen management in Sweden. Ecol Econ 47:53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2002.11.001
Cai W, Wang C, Chen J, Wang K, Zhang Y, Lu X (2008) Comparison of CO2 emission scenarios and mitigation opportunities in China’s five sectors in 2020. Energy Policy 36:1181–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.030
Chen L, Xu L, Yang Z (2017) Accounting carbon emission changes under regional industrial transfer in an urban agglomeration in China’s Pearl River Delta. J Clean Prod 167:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.041
Chen ZM, Liu Y, Qin P, Zhang B, Lester L, Chen G, Guo Y, Zheng X (2015) Environmental externality of coal use in China: welfare effect and tax regulation. Appl Energy 156:16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.066
Cheng B, Dai H, Wang P, Xie Y, Chen L, Zhao D, Masui T (2016) Impacts of low-carbon power policy on carbon mitigation in Guangdong Province, China. Energy Policy 88:515–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.006
Di Maria F, Sisani F (2019) A sustainability assessment for use on land or wastewater treatment of the digestate from bio-waste. Waste Manag 87:741–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.015
Dong F, Yu B, Hadachin T, Dai Y, Wang Y, Zhang S, Long R (2018) Drivers of carbon emission intensity change in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.035
Erten B, Leight J, Tregenna F (2019) Trade liberalization and local labor market adjustment in South Africa. J Int Econ 118:448–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.02.006
Guan Y, Kang L, Shao C, Wang P, Ju M (2017) Measuring county-level heterogeneity of CO2 emissions attributed to energy consumption: a case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. J Clean Prod 142:3471–3481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.120
Ikram M, Mahmoudi A, Shah SZA, Mohsin M (2019a) Forecasting number of ISO 14001 certifications of selected countries: application of even GM (1,1), DGM, and NDGM models. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04534-2
Ikram M, Sroufe R, Mohsin M, Solangi YA, Shah SZA, Shahzad F (2019b) Does CSR influence firm performance? A longitudinal study of SME sectors of Pakistan. J Glob Responsib 11:27–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-12-2018-0088
Inglesi-Lotz R (2018) Decomposing the south African CO2 emissions within a BRICS countries context: signalling potential energy rebound effects. Energy 147:648–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.150
IPCC (2006) Task force on national greenhouse gas inventories. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/. Accessed 19 Jun 2020
Iqbal W, Yumei H, Abbas Q, Hafeez M, Mohsin M, Fatima A, Jamali M, Jamali M, Siyal A, Sohail N (2019) Assessment of wind energy potential for the production of renewable hydrogen in Sindh Province of Pakistan. Processes 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040196
Iram R, Zhang J, Erdogan S, Abbas Q, Mohsin M (2019) Economics of energy and environmental efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:3858–3870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07020-x
Li N, Lin H, Wang T, Li Y, Liu Y, Chen X, Hu X (2020) Impact of climate change on cotton growth and yields in Xinjiang, China. F Crop Res 247:107590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107590
Liu G., Yang Z., Chen B, Zhang Y, Su M., Ulgiati S (2016) Prevention and control policy analysis for energy-related regional pollution management in China Appl Energy 166:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.032
Mohsin M, Abbas Q, Zhang J, Ikram M, Iqbal N (2019a) Integrated effect of energy consumption, economic development, and population growth on CO2 based environmental degradation: a case of transport sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32824–32835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06372-8
Mohsin M, Rasheed AK, Saidur R (2018a) Economic viability and production capacity of wind generated renewable hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:2621–2630
Mohsin M, Rasheed AK, Sun H, Zhang J, Iram R, Iqbal N, Abbas Q (2019b) Developing low carbon economies: an aggregated composite index based on carbon emissions. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 35:365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.08.003
Mohsin M, Zhang J, Saidur R, Sun H, Sait SM (2019c) Economic assessment and ranking of wind power potential using fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:22494–22511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05564-6
Mohsin M, Zhou P, Iqbal N, Shah SAA (2018b) Assessing oil supply security of South Asia. Energy 155:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.116
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2015) China input-output table 2012. China Statistics Press, Beijing
Palaniyandi SA, Yang SH, Zhang L, Suh JW (2013) Effects of actinobacteria on plant disease suppression and growth promotion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:9621–9636
Pang J, Chen X, Zhang Z, Li H (2016) Measuring eco-efficiency of agriculture in China. Sustain 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040398
Pérez de Arce M, Sauma E, Contreras J (2016) Renewable energy policy performance in reducing CO2 emissions. Ener Econ 54:272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.024
Shah SAA, Zhou P, Walasai GD, Mohsin M (2019) Energy security and environmental sustainability index of South Asian countries: a composite index approach. Ecol Indic 106:105507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105507
Shahbaz M, Menichetti L, Kätterer T, Börjesson G (2019) Impact of long-term N fertilisation on CO2 evolution from old and young SOM pools measured during the maize cropping season. Sci Total Environ 658:1539–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.302
Sun H, Ikram M, Mohsin M, Abbas Q (2019a) Energy security and environmental efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Singap Econ Rev:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590819430033
Sun H, Mohsin M, Alharthi M, Abbas Q (2020a) Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia. J Clean Prod 251:119519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519
Sun HP, Tariq G, Haris M, Mohsin M (2019b) Evaluating the environmental effects of economic openness: evidence from SAARC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:24542–24551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05750-6
Sun L, Qin L, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Zhang J, Mohsin M, Chaudhry IS (2020b) Analyzing carbon emission transfer network structure among provinces in China: new evidence from social network analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08911-0
Talukder B, vanLoon GW, Hipel KW (2019) Energy efficiency of agricultural systems in the southwest coastal zone of Bangladesh. Ecol Indic 98:641–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.030
Tan S, Yang J, Yan J, Lee C, Hashim H, Chen B (2017) A holistic low carbon city indicator framework for sustainable development. Appl Energy 185:1919–1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.041
Vlontzos G, Niavis S, Manos B (2014) A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:91–96
Wang Q, Yang X (2020) Imbalance of carbon embodied in South-South trade: evidence from China-India trade. Sci Total Environ 707:134473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134473
Wang S, Ma Y (2018) Influencing factors and regional discrepancies of the efficiency of carbon dioxide emissions in Jiangsu, China. Ecol Indic 90:460–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.033
Wu J, An Q, Xiong B, Chen Y (2013) Congestion measurement for regional industries in China: a data envelopment analysis approach with undesirable outputs. Energy Policy 57:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.062
Wu R, Geng Y, Dong H, Fujita T, Tian X (2016) Changes of CO2 emissions embodied in China-Japan trade: drivers and implications. J Clean Prod 112:4151–4158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.017
Xie X, Cai W, Jiang Y, Zeng W (2015) Carbon footprints and embodied carbon flows analysis for China’s eight regions: a new perspective for mitigation solutions. Sustainability 7:10098–10114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810098
Yuan R, Rodrigues JFD, Behrens P (2019) Driving forces of household carbon emissions in China: a spatial decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 233:932–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.110
Zhang B, Bi J, Fan Z, Yuan Z, Ge J (2008) Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecol Econ 68:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.009
Zhou D, Zhou X, Xu Q, Wu F, Wang Q, Zha D (2018) Regional embodied carbon emissions and their transfer characteristics in China. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 46:180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.05.008
Zhou XB, Chen LL, Fan HY et al (2019) Measurement of regional environmental efficiency in China based on the super-efficiency SBM model. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17:8985–9005. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_89859005
Zhou Y, Kong Y, Zhang T (2020) The spatial and temporal evolution of provincial eco-efficiency in China based on SBM modified three-stage data envelopment analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:8557–8569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07515-7
Zhu Z, Li Q, Tang G, Wakin MB (2018) Global optimality in low-rank matrix optimization. In: 2017 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, GlobalSIP 2017 - Proceedings. pp 1275–1279
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akbar, U., Li, QL., Akmal, M.A. et al. Nexus between agro-ecological efficiency and carbon emission transfer: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 18995–19007 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09614-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09614-2