Detecting signals of new technological opportunities using semantic patent analysis and outlier detection

• Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3), 251–259.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aleskerov, E., Freisleben, B., & Rao, B. (2002). Cardwatch: A neural network based database mining system for credit card fraud detection. In IEEE (pp. 220–226).

• Altschuller, G. (1984). Creativity as an exact science: The theory of the solution of inventive problems. New York: Gordon and Breach.

  Google Scholar 

• Barnett, V., Lewis, T., & Abeles, F. (1979). Outliers in statistical data. Physics Today, 32, 73.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bergmann, I., Butzke, D., Walter, L., Fuerste, J., Moehrle, M., & Erdmann, V. (2008). Evaluating the risk of patent infringement by means of semantic patent analysis: The case of DNA chips. R&D Management, 38(5), 550–562.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cascini, G., Fantechi, A., & Spinicci, E. (2004). Natural language processing of patents and technical documentation. Document Analysis Systems, VI, 508–520.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cascini, G., Russo, D., & Zini, M. (2007). Computer-aided patent analysis: Finding invention peculiarities. In N. Leon-Rovira (Ed.), Trends in computer aided innovation (pp. 167–178). Boston: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Cascini, G., & Zini, M. (2008). Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 277, 31–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41(3), 1–58.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Choi, S., Lim, J., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2010). Patent function network analysis: A function based approach for analyzing patent information. In IAMOT2010, Cairo, Egypt.

• Christensen, C., & Leslie, D. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Franses, P., Kloek, T., & Lucas, A. (1998). Outlier robust analysis of long-run marketing effects for weekly scanning data. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1–2), 293–315.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fujii, A., Iwayama, M., & Kando, N. (2007). Introduction to the special issue on patent processing. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1149–1153.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gerken, J., Moehrle, M., & Walter, L. (2010). Patents as an information source for product forecasting: Insights from a longitudinal study in the automotive industry. In The R&D management conference 2010, Manchester, England.

• Hodge, V., & Austin, J. (2004). A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial Intelligence Review, 22(2), 85–126.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Karki, M. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269–272.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Kruskal, J. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29(2), 115–129.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Lee, S., Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2009). An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach. Technovation, 29(6–7), 481–497.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leung, K., & Leckie, C. (2005). Unsupervised anomaly detection in network intrusion detection using clusters (pp. 333–342). Sydney: Australian Computer Society, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Lin, D. (2010). Minipar. http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~lindek/minipar.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.

• Mann, D. (2002). Hands-on systematic innovation. Leper: CREAX Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Mann, D. (2003). Better technology forecasting using systematic innovation methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(8), 779–795.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller, G. (1995). Wordnet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moehrle, M., & Geritz, A. (2004). Developing acquisition strategies based on patent maps. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on management of technology (pp. 1–9), Washington, DC, USA.

• Moehrle, M., Walter, L., Geritz, A., & Muller, S. (2005). Patent-based inventor profiles as a basis for human resource decisions in research and development. R&D Management, 35(5), 513–524.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mogee, M., & Kolar, R. (1994). International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6(4), 485–504.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147–155.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Park, B. (2002). An outlier robust GARCH model and forecasting volatility of exchange rate returns. Journal of Forecasting, 21(5), 381–393.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Radauer, A., & Walter, L. (2010). Elements of good practice for providers of publicly funded patent information services for SMEs-selected and amended results of a benchmarking exercise. World Patent Information, 32(3), 237–245.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Resnik, P. (1999). Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11(95), 130.

  Google Scholar 

• Savransky, S. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. Boca Raton: CRC.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Schuh, G., & Grawatsch, M. (2004). TRIZ-based technology intelligence. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on management of technology, Washington, DC, USA.

• Sekar, R., Gupta, A., Frullo, J., Shanbhag, T., Tiwari, A., Yang, H., et al. (2002). Specification-based anomaly detection: A new approach for detecting network intrusions. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on computer and communications security, New York, USA.

• Simpson, T., & Dao, T. (2005). Wordnet-based semantic similarity measurement. http://www.codeproject.com/KB/string/semanticsimilaritywordnet.aspx. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.

• Siris, V., & Papagalou, F. (2006). Application of anomaly detection algorithms for detecting SYN flooding attacks. Computer Communications, 29(9), 1433–1442.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stanford. (2010). The Stanford parser: A statistical parser. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.

• Yoon, B. (2008). On the development of a technology intelligence tool for identifying technology opportunity. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1–2), 124–135.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, J., Choi, S., & Kim, K. (2011). Invention property-function network analysis of patents: A case of silicon-based thin film solar cells. Scientometrics, 86(3), 687–703.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2011a). Generation of patent maps using SAO-based semantic patent similarity. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 10(1), 19–27.

  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2011b). Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks. Scientometrics, 88(1), 213–228.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). Morphology analysis approach for technology forecasting. In 2004 IEEE international engineering management conference (Vol. 2, pp. 566–570), Singapore.

• Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2005). A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2), 145–160.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, B., Yoon, C., & Park, Y. (2002). On the development and application of a self-organizing feature map-based patent map. R&D Management, 32(4), 291–300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references