Abstract
This paper establishes and tests a model to extrapolate vine water status spatially across a vineyard block. The proposed spatial model extrapolates predawn leaf water potential (PLWP), measured at a reference location, to other unsampled locations using a linear combination of spatial ancillary information sources (AIS) and the reference measurement. In the model, the reference value accounts for temporal variability and the AIS accounts for spatial variation of vine water status, which enables extrapolation over the whole domain (vine fields in this case) at any time when a reference measurement is made. The spatial model was validated for two fields planted with Syrah and Mourvèdre during the seasons 2003–2004 and 2005–2006, respectively, in the south of France. The proposed spatial model significantly improved the prediction of vine water status, especially under conditions of high water restriction (PLWP < −0.4 MPa), compared with a non-spatial model. The model was robust to the choice of reference site. The results also highlighted that AIS pertaining to canopy growth are the most relevant variables for predicting PLWP under these experimental conditions. Preliminary results showed the potential to calibrate the model from a limited number of field measurements, making it a realistic option for adoption in commercial vineyards. The success of the spatial model in improving the quality of prediction of PLWP means it could be incorporated into a decision-support tool to improve irrigation management within a vineyard.









Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acevedo-Opazo, C., Tisseyre, B., Guillaume, S., & Ojeda, H. (2008a). The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status. Precision Agriculture, 9, 285–302.
Acevedo-Opazo, C., Tisseyre, B., Guillaume, S., & Ojeda, H. (2010). Spatial extrapolation of the vine (Vitis vinifera L.) water status: A first step towards a spatial prediction model. Irrigation Science, 28, 143–155.
Acevedo-Opazo, C., Tisseyre, B., Ojeda, H., Ortega-Farías, S., & Guillaume, S. (2008b). Is it possible to assess the spatial variability of vine water status? International Journal of Wine and Vine Research, 42, 203–219.
Corwin, D. L., & Lesch, S. M. (2005). Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity. I. Soil survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46, 32–45.
Coulouma, G., Tisseyre, B., & Lagacherie, P. (2010). Is a systematic two dimensional EMI soil survey always relevant for vineyard production management? A test on two pedologically contrasting Mediterranean vineyards (Chap. 24). In R. A. Viscarra-Rossel, A. B. McBratney, & B. Minasny (Eds.), Proximal soil sensing. Progress in soil science series. Heidelburg, Germany: Springer (in press). ISBN 978-90-481-8858-1.
Lamb, D. W., Weedon, M. M., & Bramley, R. G. V. (2004). Using remote sensing to predict phenolics and colour at harvest in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard: Timing observations against vine phenology and optimising image resolution. Australian Journal Grape Wine Research, 10, 46–54.
Martinez-Casanovas, J. A., Valles Bigorda, D., & Ramos, M. C. (2009). Irrigation management zones for precision viticulture according to intra-field variability. In A. Bregt, S. Wolfert, J. E. Wien, & C. Lokhorst (Eds.), EFITA conference ‘09. Proceedings of the 7th EFITA conference (pp. 523–529). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Murisier, F., & Zufferey, V. (1997). Rapport feuille-fruit de la vigne et qualité du raisin. Revue Suisse de Viticulture, Arboriculture, Horticulture, 29, 355–362.
Ojeda, H., Carrillo, N., Deis, L., Tisseyre, B., Heywang, M., & Carbonneau, A. (2005a). Precision viticulture and water status II: Quantitative and qualitative performance of different within field zones, defined from water potential mapping. In H. R. Schultz (Ed.), Proceedings of 14th GESCO congress (pp. 741–748). Geisenheim, Germany: Groupe d’Etudes des Systèmes de Conduite de la Vigne.
Ojeda, H., Lebon, E., Deis, L., Vita, F., & Carbonneau, A. (2005b). Stomatal regulation of Mediterranean grapevine cultivars in drought situations of the southern of France. In H. R. Schultz (Ed.), Proceedings of 14th GESCO congress (pp. 581–587). Geisenheim, Germany: Groupe d’Etudes des Systèmes de Conduite de la Vigne.
Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1973). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In 3rd ERTS symposium, NASA SP-351 I (pp. 309–317).
Samouëlian, A., Cousin, I., Tabbagh, A., Bruand, A., & Richard, G. (2005). Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: A review. Soil and Tillage Research, 83, 173–193.
Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Brandstreet, E. T., & Hemmingsen, E. A. (1965). Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science, 148, 339–346.
Schultz, H. R. (2003). Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell and Environment, 26, 1393–1405.
Tisseyre, B., Mazzoni, C., & Fonta, H. (2008). Whithin-field temporal stability of some parameters in viticulture: Potential toward a site specific management. International Journal of Wine and Vine Research, 42, 27–39.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Vinnotec project (Qualimed Pole of Languedoc Roussillon region—France) and the Agropolis Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acevedo-Opazo, C., Tisseyre, B., Taylor, J.A. et al. A model for the spatial prediction of water status in vines (Vitis vinifera L.) using high resolution ancillary information. Precision Agric 11, 358–378 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9164-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9164-7