Abstract
Rapid urban sprawl and population decentralization in recent decades have increased the size of the wildland-urban interface and resulted in higher community risk and vulnerability to wildfire. This paper primarily focuses on understanding grass-fueled fires common to Texas and improving the understanding of the physics and fire dynamics that are inherent in the grassland and prairie flame spread problem. Little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) grass was chosen as the grassland fuel due to its prevalent coverage in the Texas area and its relevance to grassland fires in Texas. The methodology in this study relies on a framework to characterize fuel properties of little bluestem grass using small- and intermediate-scale experiments to better predict full-scale fire behavior. An intermediate-scale numerical flame spread model was developed for grass fuels that accounts for fuel moisture content to calculate the mass versus time of a burning little bluestem plant. The results of the small- and intermediate-scale experiments were used to develop input parameters for a field-scale numerical simulation of a grass field using a physics-based computational fire model, Wildland-urban interface Fire Dynamics Simulator (WFDS). A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of varying WFDS input parameters on the fire spread rate. The results indicate that the fuel moisture content had the most significant impact on the fire spread rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clements C (2007) Observing the dynamics of wildland grass fires: fireflux—a field validation experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 1–14
Massada A, Radeloff V, Stewart S, Hawbaker T (2009) Wildfire risk in the wildland–urban interface: a simulation study in northwestern Wisconsin. For Ecol Manage 258(9):1990–1999
Gray R, Dunivan M, Jones J, Ridenour K, Leathers M, Stafford K (2007) Cross Plains, Texas wildland fire case study. Texas Forest Service, Lufkin
Inciweb (2011) Bastrop fire incident overview. http://www.inciweb.org/incident/2589/. Accessed 1 Dec 2011
Finney MA (2004) FARSITE: Fire area simulator—model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service Research Paper, RMRS-RP-4 Revised
Mutlu M, Popescu S, Zhao K (2008) Sensitivity analysis of fire behavior modeling with LIDAR-derived surface fuel maps. For Ecol Manage 256(3):289–294
Hardy C, Heilman W, Weise D, Goodrick S, Ottmar R (2008) Fire behavior science advancement plan
Mell W, Jenkins M, Gould J, Cheney P (2007) A physics-based approach to modelling grassland fires. Int J Wildland Fire 16(1):1–22
Albini F (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. USDA Forest Service, intermountain forest and range experiment station, general technical report INT-30, p 92
Anderson H (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, intermountain forest and range experiment station. General technical report, INT-122, p 22
Viney N (1991) A review of fine fuel moisture modelling. Int J Wildland Fire 1(4):215–234
Bartoli P, Simeoni A, Biteau H, Torero JL, Santoni PA (2011) Determination of the main parameters influencing forest fuel combustion dynamics. Fire Saf J 46(1–2):27–33
Beer T (1993) The speed of a fire front and its dependence on wind-speed. Int J Wildland Fire 3(4):193–202
Allred K (1982) Describing the grass inflorescence. J Range Manage 35(5):672–675
Cheney N, Gould J, Catchpole W (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. Int J Wildland Fire 3(1):31–44
Mindykowski P, Fuentes A, Consalvi JL, Porterie B (2011) Piloted ignition of wildland fuels. Fire Saf J 46(1–2):34–40
Tran H, White R (1992) Burning rate of solid wood measured in a heat release rate calorimeter. Fire Mater 16(4):197–206
Quintiere JG (2006) Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Wiley, Chichester
Society of Fire Protection Engineers (2008) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 4th edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy
Anderson H, Rothermel R (1965) Influence of moisture and wind upon the characteristics of free-burning fires. In: Proceedings of symposium (international) on combustion, vol 10. Pittsburgh, pp 1009–1019
Cheney N, Gould J, Catchpole W (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. Int J Wildland Fire 8(1):1–13
Rehm R, McDermott R (2009) Mathematical modeling of wildland–urban interface fires. Paper presented at the mathematics and fire workshop, Zaragoza
Sharples JJ, Mcrae RHD, Weber RO, Gill AM (2009) A simple index for assessing fuel moisture content. Environ Model Softw 24(5):637–646
Madrigal J, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Diez C, Marino E (2011) Estimation of peak heat release rate of a forest fuel bed in outdoor laboratory conditions. J Fire Sci 29(1):53–70
Mell W, Maranghides A, McDermott R, Manzello S (2009) Numerical simulation and experiments of burning douglas fir trees. Combust Flame 156(10):2023–2041
Dupuy J, Marechal J, Morvan D (2003) Fires from a cylindrical forest fuel burner: combustion dynamics and flame properties. Combust Flame 135(1–2):65–76
Stenseng M, Jensen A, Dam-Johansen K (2001) Investigation of biomass pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. J Anal Appl Pyrol 58–59:765–780
Zhang Z, Zhang H, Zhou D (2011) Flammability characterisation of grassland species of Songhua Jiang-Nen Jiang Plain (China) using thermal analysis. Fire Saf J 46(5):1–6
Overholt KJ, Ezekoye OA (2012) Characterizing heat release rates using an inverse fire modeling technique. Fire Technology. doi:10.1007/s10694-011-0250-9
Dalgarn M, Wilson R (1975) Net productivity and ecological efficiency of andropogon scoparius growing in an Ohio relict prairie. Ohio J Sci 75(4):194–197
Golley F (1961) Energy values of ecological materials. Ecology 42(3):581–584
Kidnie S (2009) Fuel load and fire behaviour in the southern Ontario tallgrass prairie. Thesis, University of Toronto
Lyon RE (2000) Solid-state thermochemistry of flaming combustion. In: Grand AF, Wilkie CA (eds) Fire retardancy of polymeric materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 391–447
Incropera FP (2001) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. Wiley, New York
McGrattan K, McDermott R, Hostikka S, Floyd J (2010) Fire dynamics simulator (Version 5): user’s guide. NIST special publication 1019–5. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg
Ritchie S, Steckler K, Hamins A, Cleary T, Yang J, Kashiwagi T (1997) The effect of sample size on the heat release rate of charring materials. In: Fire safety science: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium, Melbourne, pp 177–188
Rothermel R (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-115
Morvan D, Méradji S, Accary G (2009) Physical modelling of fire spread in grasslands. Fire Saf J 44(1):50–61
Leithead HL, Yarlett LL, Shiflet TN (1971) 100 native forage grasses in 11 southern states (Agriculture handbook no. 389). U.S. Soil Conservation Service
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge contributions from and collaboration with Karen Ridenour and Richard Gray of Texas Forest Service, Kate Crosthwaite of Texas National Guard, and Craig Weinschenk of National Institute of Standards and Technology. The authors also thank Ruddy Mell for his useful comments on the details of WFDS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Overholt, K.J., Cabrera, J., Kurzawski, A. et al. Characterization of Fuel Properties and Fire Spread Rates for Little Bluestem Grass. Fire Technol 50, 9–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0266-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0266-9