Abstract
The monitoring role performed by the board of directors is an important corporate governance control mechanism, especially in countries where external mechanisms are less well developed. The gender composition of the board can affect the quality of this monitoring role and thus the financial performance of the firm. This is part of the “business case” for female participation on boards, though arguments may also be framed in terms of ethical considerations. While the issue of board gender diversity has attracted growing research interest in recent years, most empirical results are based on U.S. data. This article adds to a growing number of non-U.S. studies by investigating the link between the gender diversity of the board and firm financial performance in Spain, a country which historically has had minimal female participation in the workforce, but which has now introduced legislation to improve equality of opportunities. We investigate the topic using panel data analysis and find that gender diversity – as measured by the percentage of women on the board and by the Blau and Shannon indices – has a positive effect on firm value and that the opposite causal relationship is not significant. Our study suggests that investors in Spain do not penalise firms which increase their female board membership and that greater gender diversity may generate economic gains.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal A., C. R. Knoeber: 1996, Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems Between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377–397
Aja, E., F. Carbonell, W. Pereda, C. Ioė, J. Funes and I. Vila: 2000, ‹La inmigración extranjera en España’. Los retos educativos', Colección de Estudios Sociales, 1, Fundación La Caixa, Barcelona
Aldama Report: 2003, ‹Report of the Special Commission for the Promotion of the Transparency and the Security in the Financial Markets and in Listed Companies’, Madrid
Andreoni J., L. Vesterlund: 2001, Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293–312
Arellano M., O. Bover: 1990, Un Estudio Econométrico Con Datos de Panel. Investigaciones Económicas, 14, 3–45
Ballesta J. P. S., E. García-Meca: 2005, Audit Qualifications and Corporate Governance in Spanish Listed Firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20, 725–738
Baumgartner, S.: 2006, ‹Measuring the Diversity of What? And for What Purpose? A Conceptual Comparison of Ecological and Economic Biodiversity Indices’, Working Paper, University of Heidelberg
Beekes W., P. Pope, S. Young: 2004, The Link Between Earnings Timeliness, Earnings Conservatism and Board Composition: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Governance, 12, 47–59
Blau P. M.: 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press
Bocatto, E.: 2006, ‹Family Owned Business Succession: The Influence of Pre-Performance in the Nomination of Family and Non-Family Members: Evidence from Spanish Firms’, Paper presented at the Department of Economics de l’Empresa Jornada Conference, November 30, 2006. Available at: http://selene.uab.es/dep-economia-empresa/Jornadas/Papers/2006_11/IVJornadas_paper_EBocatto.pdf
Böhren, O. and R. O. Ström: 2005, ‹Aligned, Informed, and Decisive: Characteristics of Value-Creating Boards’, Working Paper, Norwegian School of Management BI, Oslo, September
Brammer S., A. Millington, S. Pavelin: 2007, Gender and Ethnic Diversity Among UK Corporate Boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393–403
Brown-Kruse J., D. Hummels: 1993, Gender Differences in Laboratory Public Goods Contribution: Do Individuals Put their Money where their Mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22, 255–267
Cabrera-Suárez K., D. J. Santana-Martín: 2004, Governance in Spanish Family Business. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 10(1/2), 141–163
Cadbury Report: 1992, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee
Carrera N., I. Gutiérrez, C. Salvador: 2001, Gender, the State and the Audit Profession: Evidence from Spain (1942–88). European Accounting Review, 10, 803–815
Carter D. A., B. J. Simkins, W. G. Simpson: 2003, Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53
Catalyst: 2004, The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity. New York: Catalyst
Catalyst: 2006, 2005 Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. New York: Catalyst
Catalyst: 2007, 2006 Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. New York: Catalyst
Catan, T.: 2006, ‹In the Dark Heart of Machismo Shines a Beacon of Sexual Equality’, The Times, November 29
Cervantes Institute: 1999, Anuario 1999. Centro Virtual Cervantes, Madrid
Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores: 2006, Report of the Special Working Group on the Good Governance of Listed Companies. CNMV: Madrid, 19 May
Cox T. H., S. Blake: 1991, Managing Cultural Diversity: Implication for Organizational Competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 45–56
Curdová, A.: 2005, ‹Discrimination Against Women in the Workforce and the Workplace’, Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men, Spanish Parliamentary Assembly, Doc. 10484
Demsetz H., B. Villalonga: 2001, Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209–233
Du Rietz A., M. Henrekson: 2000, Testing the Female Underperformance Hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 1–10
Earley P. C., E. Mosakowski: 2000, Creating Hybrid Team Cultures: An Empirical Test of Transnational Team Functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26–49
Erhardt N. L., J. D. Werbel, C. B. Shrader: 2003, Board of Directors Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 102–111
Fama E. F., M. C. Jensen: 1983, Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325
Farrell K. A., P. L. Hersch: 2005, Additions to Corporate Boards: the Effect of Gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–206
Fernández A. I., S. Gómez-Ansón, C. Fernández-Méndez: 1998, El Papel Supervisor del Consejo de Administración Sobre la Actuación Gerencial. Evidencia Para el Caso Español. Investigaciones Económicas, 22, 501–516
Gerke W., M. Bank, M. Steiger: 2003, The Changing Role of Institutional Investors – A German Perspective. In Hopt, K. J., E. Wymeersch (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law (New York: Oxford University Press), (pp 357–385)
Griffith J. M.: 1999, CEO Ownership and Firm Value. Managerial and Decision Economics, 20, 1–8
Hall, B. H.: 1999, ‹Innovation and Firm Value’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6984. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6984.pdf/
Hambrick D. C., T. S. Cho, M. J. Chen: 1996, The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms’ Competitive Moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684
Harrison, D. A. and K. J. Klein: 2007, ‹What’s the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Separation, Variety, or Disparity in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review (forthcoming)
Heidrick and Struggles: 2007, ‹Corporate Governance in Europe: 2007 Report’, Paris
Herfindahl, O. C.: 1950, ‹Concentration in the U.S. Steel Industry’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York
Hermalin B., M. S. Weisbach: 1991, The Effect of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Corporate Performance. Financial Management, 20, 101–112
Hillier, D. and P. McColgan: 2001, ‹Insider Ownership and Corporate Value: An Empirical Test from the United Kingdom Corporate Sector’, Financial Management Association (FMA) Meeting, Paris
Himmelberg C. P., R. G. Hubbard, D. Palia (1999), Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 353–384
Hirschman A. O.: 1964, The Paternity of an Index. American Economic Review, 54, 761–762
Hyland D. C., J. D. Diltz: 2002, Why Firms Diversify: An Empirical Examination. Financial Management, 31, 51–81
ILO: 2007, ‹Global Employment Trends for Women Brief’, March, International Labour Organization, Geneva
Jaskiewicz P., V. M. González, S. Menéndez, D. Schiereck: 2005, Long-Run IPO Performance Analysis of German and Spanish Family-Owned Businesses. Family Business Review, 18(3), 179–202
Jianakoplos N. A., A. Bernasek: 1998, Are Women More Risk Averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620–630
Kini O., W. Kracaw, S. Mian: 1995, Corporate Takeovers, Firm Performance, and Board Composition. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1, 383–412
Konrad A. M., V. W. Kramer: 2006, ‹How Many Women Do Boards Need?’, Harvard Business Review, December, 84(12), 22
La Porta R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny: 1997, Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–1150
La Porta R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny: 1998, Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155
La Porta R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny: 2002, Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147–1170
Lang L. H., R. M. Stulz: 1994, Tobin’s q, Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1248–1280
Lau D. C., J. K. Murnighan: 1998, Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340
Lindenberg E., S. Ross: 1981, Tobin’s q Ratio and Industrial Organization. Journal of Business, 54(1), 1–32
López-Iturriaga F. J., J. A. Rodríguez-Sanz: 2001, Ownership Structure, Corporate Value and Firm Investment: A Simultaneous Equations Analysis of Spanish Firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 179–204
Megna P., M. Klock: 1993, The Impact of Intangible Capital on Tobin’s q in the Semiconductor Industry. American Economic Review, 83, 265–269
Montgomery C., B. Wernerfelt: 1988, Tobin’s q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance. American Economic Review, 78(1), 246–250
Morck R., A. Shleifer, R. W. Vishny: 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315
Nowell C., S. Tinkler: 1994, The Influence of Gender on the Provision of a Public Good. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 25–36
Olivencia Report: 1998, ‹Report of the Special Commission to Consider a Code of Ethics for Companies Boards of Directors’, Madrid
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: 2006a, OECD Labour Force Statistics by Age and Sex (OECD, Paris). http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/default.aspx
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: 2006b, Education at a Glance 2006 (OECD, Paris). http://www.oecd.org/edu/eag2006
Randøy, T., S. Thomsen and L. Oxelheim: 2006: ‹A Nordic Perspective on Corporate Board Diversity’, Working Paper, Nordic Innovation Centre, Oslo
Richard O. C., T. Barnett, S. Dwyer, K. Chadwick: 2004, Cultural Diversity in Management, Firm Performance, and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation Dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 255–266
Robinson G., K. Dechant: 1997, Building a Business Case for Diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 21–30
Rose C.: 2007, Does Female Board Representation Influence Firm Performance? The Danish Evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413
Shannon C. E.: 1948, A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423
Shrader C. B., V. B. Blackburn, J. P. Iles: 1997, Women in Management and Firm Financial Value: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355–372
Simpson E. H. (1949), Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163, 688
Smirlock M., T. W. Gilligan, W. J. Marshall: 1984, Tobin’s q and the Structure–Performance Relationship. American Economic Review, 74, 1051–1060
Smith N., V. Smith, M. Verner: 2006, Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2,500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593
Soria, F.: 2002, ‹Los Principales Retos de la Empresa Familiar en el Siglo XXI’, Fusiones y Adquisiciones Capital & Corporate, Octubre, UNILCO
Steiner T. L.: 1996, A Reexamination of the Relationships Between Ownership Structure, Firm Diversification, and Tobin’s q. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 35(4), 39–48
Stirling, A.: 1998, ‹On the Economics and Analysis of Diversity’, Science Policy Research Unit Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper no. 28, University of Sussex
Tajfel H., J. Turner: 1986, The Social Identity of Inter-Group Behavior in Worchel S., W. Austin (eds.), Psychology and Intergroup Relations (Chicago: Nelson-Hall), pp. 7–24
Weisbach M.: 1988, Outside Directors and CEO Turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460
Wiener N.: 1961, Cybernetics. MIT Press, Cambridge
Williams K., C. O’Reilly: 1998, Forty Years of Diversity Research: A Review, in Staw B. M., L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), pp. 77–140
Wools, D.: 2007, ‹Spain Lawmakers OK Women’s Equality Law’, Associated Press, March 15
Yermack D.: 1996, Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, K., Mínguez-Vera, A. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. J Bus Ethics 83, 435–451 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y