Abstract
This study analyzed the postural control of older adults on inclined surfaces, and was conducted in 17 elderly adults and 18 young adults of both genders. Ground reaction forces and moments were collected using two AMTI force platforms, one of which was in a horizontal position (HOR), while the other was inclined 14° in relation to the horizontal plane. Each participant executed three 70 s-trials of bipedal standing with their eyes open and eyes closed in three inclination conditions: the HOR, the inclined position at ankle dorsi-flexion (UP), and the inclined position at ankle plantar-flexion (DOWN). Spectral analysis, global (mean velocity-Velm, ellipse area-Area and F80), and structural stabilometric descriptors (sway density curve–SDC, detrended fluctuation analysis–DFA, sample entropy-SEn) were employed to assess the center of pressure sway. Velm and F80 were greater for the elderly, whereas SDC, DFA, and SEn were smaller for this group. Global, SDC and DFA variables were sensitive to visual deprivation, however the relative difference from the EO to EC condition was higher in young than in elderly. The DOWN condition was more stable than the UP condition for both young and older adults. With regard to the UP condition, the challenge observed is essentially associated with the corresponding biomechanical constraints. In conclusion, the elderly showed significant differences compared to the young, but age per se may not necessarily result in compromised postural control.






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amoud, H., M. Abadi, D. J. Hewson, V. Michel-Pellegrino, M. Doussot, and J. Duchêne. Fractal time series analysis of postural stability in elderly and control subjects. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 4:12, 2007.
Baratto, L., P. G. Morasso, C. Re, and G. Spada. A new look at posturographic analysis in the clinical context: sway-density versus other parameterization techniques. Motor Control 6:246–270, 2002.
Benjuya, N., I. Melzer, and J. Kaplanski. Aging-induced shifts from a reliance on sensory input to muscle cocontraction during balanced standing. J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 59:166–171, 2004.
Bok, S. K., T. H. Lee, and S. S. Lee. The effects of changes of ankle strength and range of motion according to aging on balance. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 37:10–16, 2013.
Borg, F. G., and G. Laxåback. Entropy of balance–some recent results. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 7:38, 2010.
Carpenter, M. G., J. S. Frank, D. A. Winter, and G. W. Peysar. Sampling duration effects on centre of pressure summary measures. Gait Posture 13:35–40, 2001.
Cavalheiro, G. L., and M. F. S. Almeida. A. a Pereira, and A. O. Andrade. Study of age-related changes in postural control during quiet standing through linear discriminant analysis. Biomed. Eng. Online 8:35, 2009.
Collins, J. J., and C. J. De Luca. The effects of visual input on open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. Exp. brain Res. 103:151–163, 1995.
Daley, M. J., and W. L. Spinks. Exercise, mobility and aging. Sports Med. 29:1–12, 2000.
Eikema, D. J. A., V. Hatzitaki, D. Tzovaras, and C. Papaxanthis. Age-dependent modulation of sensory reweighting for controlling posture in a dynamic virtual environment. Age (Omaha). 34:1381–1392, 2012.
Garkavenko, V. V., A. V. Gorkovenko, E. V. Kolosova, and V. V. Korneyev. A. V. Mel’nichouk, and D. A. Vasilenko. Modifcations of the stabilogram during upright standing posture under conditions of inclines of the support surface. Neurophysiology 44:131–137, 2012.
Ihlen, E. A. F. Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in matlab. Front. Physiol. 3:141, 2012.
Iosa, M., A. Fusco, G. Morone, and S. Paolucci. Development and decline of upright gait stability. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6:1–12, 2014.
Ko, J. H., and K. M. Newell. Aging and the complexity of center of pressure in static and dynamic postural tasks. Neurosci. Lett. 610:104–109, 2016.
Lakie, M., and I. D. Loram. Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process. J. Physiol. 577:403–416, 2006.
Laurens, J., L. Awai, C. J. Bockisch, S. Hegemann, H. J. A. van Hedel, V. Dietz, and D. Straumann. Visual contribution to postural stability: Interaction between target fixation or tracking and static or dynamic large-field stimulus. Gait Posture 31:37–41, 2010.
Maurer, C., and R. J. Peterka. A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control. J. Neurophysiol. 93:189–200, 2005.
McIntosh, A. S., K. T. Beatty, L. N. Dwan, and D. R. Vickers. A. S. M. Ã, K. T. Beatty, L. N. Dwan, and D. R. Vickers. Gait dynamics on an inclined walkway. J. Biomech. 39:2491–2502, 2006.
Mezzarane, R. A., and A. F. Kohn. Control of upright stance over inclined surfaces. Exp. Brain Res. 180:377–388, 2007.
Norris, J. A., A. P. Marsh, I. J. Smith, R. I. Kohut, and M. E. Miller. Ability of static and statistical mechanics posturographic measures to distinguish between age and fall risk. J. Biomech. 38:1263–1272, 2005.
Prieto, T. E., J. B. Myklebust, R. G. Hoffmann, E. G. Lovett, and B. M. Myklebust. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43:956–966, 1996.
Ramdani, S., B. Seigle, J. Lagarde, F. Bouchara, and P. L. Bernard. On the use of sample entropy to analyze human postural sway data. Med. Eng. Phys. 31:1023–1031, 2009.
Rhea, C. K., T. A. Silver, S. L. Hong, J. H. Ryu, B. E. Studenka, C. M. L. Hughes, and J. M. Haddad. Noise and complexity in human postural control: Interpreting the different estimations of entropy. PLoS One 6:1–9, 2011.
Roerdink, M., M. De Haart, A. Daffertshofer, S. F. Donker, A. C. H. Geurts, and P. J. Beek. Dynamical structure of center-of-pressure trajectories in patients recovering from stroke. Exp. Brain Res. 174:256–269, 2006.
Sasaki, O., S. Usami, P.-M. Gagey, J. Martinerie, M. Le Van Quyen, and P. Arranz. Role of visual input in nonlinear postural control system. Exp. Brain Res. 147:1–7, 2002.
Schubert, P., and M. Kirchner. Ellipse area calculations and their applicability in posturography. Gait Posture 39:518–522, 2014.
Shin, G., and G. Mirka. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting. Ergonomics 47:646–659, 2004.
Shupert, C. L., and F. B. Horak. Adaptation of postural control in normal and pathologic aging: Implications for fall prevention programs. J. Appl. Biomech. 15:64–74, 1999.
Stins, J. F., M. E. Michielsen, M. Roerdink, and P. J. Beek. Sway regularity reflects attentional involvement in postural control: Effects of expertise, vision and cognition. Gait Posture 30:106–109, 2009.
Teresa Blázquez, M., M. Anguiano, F. A. de Saavedra, A. M. Lallena, and P. Carpena. Study of the human postural control system during quiet standing using detrended fluctuation analysis. Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl. 388:1857–1866, 2009.
Vieira, M. F., I. S. de Avelar, M. S. Silva, V. Soares, and P. H. Lobo da Costa. Effects of four days hiking on postural control. PLoS One 10:e0123214, 2015.
Vieira, T. D. M. M., L. F. De Oliveira, and J. Nadal. An overview of age-related changes in postural control during quiet standing tasks using classical and modern stabilometric descriptors. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 19:e513–e519, 2009.
Vieira, T. M. M., L. F. Oliveira, and J. Nadal. Estimation procedures affect the center of pressure frequency analysis. Brazilian J. Med. Biol. Res. 42:665–673, 2009.
Wiesmeier, I. K., D. Dalin, and C. Maurer. Elderly use proprioception rather than visual and vestibular cues for postural motor control. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7:97, 2015.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to governmental agencies CAPES and FAPEG for supporting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Costa Barbosa, R., Vieira, M.F. Postural Control of Elderly Adults on Inclined Surfaces. Ann Biomed Eng 45, 726–738 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1718-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1718-z