[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

International field testing of the psychometric properties of an EORTC quality of life module for oral health: the EORTC QLQ-OH15

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This international EORTC validation study (phase IV) is aimed at testing the psychometric properties of a quality of life (QoL) module related to oral health problems in cancer patients.

Methods

The phase III module comprised 17 items with four hypothesized multi-item scales and three single items. In phase IV, patients with mixed cancers, in different treatment phases from 10 countries completed the EORTC QLQ-C30, the QLQ-OH module, and a debriefing interview. The hypothesized structure was tested using combinations of classical test theory and item response theory, following EORTC guidelines. Test–retest assessments and responsiveness to change analysis (RCA) were performed after 2 weeks.

Results

Five hundred seventy-two patients (median age 60.3, 54 % females) were analyzed. Completion took <10 min for 84 %, 40 % expressed satisfaction that these issues were addressed. Analyses suggested a revision of the phase III hypothesized scale structure. Two items were deleted based on a high degree of item misfit, together with negative patient feedback. The remaining 15 items formed one eight-item scale named OH-QoL score, a two-item information scale, a two-item scale regarding dentures, and three single items (sticky saliva/mouth soreness/sensitivity to food/drink). Face and convergent validity and internal consistency were confirmed. Test–retest reliability (n = 60) was demonstrated as was RCA for patients undergoing chemotherapy (n = 117; p = 0.06). The resulting QLQ-OH15 discriminated between clinically distinct patient groups, e.g., low performance status vs. higher (p < 000.1), and head-and-neck cancer versus other cancers (p < 0.03).

Conclusion

The EORTC module QLQ-OH15 is a short, well-accepted assessment tool focusing on oral problems and QoL to improve clinical management.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01724333.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH State-of-the-Science Statement on symptom management in cancer: Pain, depression, and fatigue (2002). NIH Consens State Science Statements 19(4): 1–29

  2. U.S.Department of Health and Human services NIoH. National Cancer Institute: The NCI strategic plan for leading the nation. To eliminate the suffering and death due to cancer (2006). In: U.S.Department of Health and Human services NIoH, ed., Bethesda, MD, US, Free-eBooks.net

  3. Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, Revicki DA, Moher D, Brundage MD (2013) Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA 309(8):814–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen SB, Pedersen AM, Vissink A, Andersen E, Brown CG, Davies AN, et al. (2010) A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life. Support Care Cancer 18(8):1039–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein JB, Thariat J, Bensadoun RJ, Barasch A, Murphy BA, Kolnick L, et al. (2012) Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy: from cancer treatment to survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin 62(6):400–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Villa A, Wolff A, Narayana N, Dawes C, Aframian DJ, Lynge Pedersen AM, Vissink A, et al. (2015) World workshop on oral medicine VI: a systematic review of medication-induced salivary gland dysfunction. Oral Dis. doi:10.1111/odi.12402

    Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein JB, Jensen SB (2015) Management of hyposalivation and xerostomia: criteria for treatment strategies. Compend Contin Educ Dent 36(8):600–603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Furness S, Worthington HV, Bryan G, Birchenough S, McMillan R (2011) Interventions for the management of dry mouth: topical therapies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD008934

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Furness S, Bryan G, McMillan R, Birchenough S, Worthington HV (2013) Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non-pharmacological interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD009603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen SB, Pedersen AM, Vissink A, Andersen E, Brown CG, Davies AN, et al. (2010) A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact. Support Care Cancer 18(8):1061–1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heckel M, Stiel S, Ostgathe C (2015) Smell and taste in palliative care: a systematic analysis of literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(2):279–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein JB, Smutzer G, Doty RL (2016) Understanding the impact of taste changes in oncology care. Supp Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3083-3088

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hong CH, Napenas JJ, Hodgson BD, Stokman MA, Mathers-Stauffer V, Elting LS, et al. (2010) A systematic review of dental disease in patients undergoing cancer therapy. Support Care Cancer 18(8):1007–1021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Elad S, Epstein JB, Raber-Durlacher J, Donnelly P, Strahilevitz J (2012) The antimicrobial effect of Iseganan HCl oral solution in patients receiving stomatotoxic chemotherapy: analysis from a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase III clinical trial. J Oral Pathol Med 41(3):229–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lalla RV, Latortue MC, Hong CH, Ariyawardana A, D’Amato-Palumbo S, Fischer DJ, et al. (2010) A systematic review of oral fungal infections in patients receiving cancer therapy. Support Care Cancer 18(8):985–992

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). Evidence-based management strategies for oral complication from cancer treatment. http://www.mascc.org/assets/documents/Oral_Care-Summary-Oral_Complications_Systematic_Reviews.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2015

  17. Al-Dasooqi N, Sonis ST, Bowen JM, Bateman E, Blijlevens N, Gibson RJ, et al. (2013) Emerging evidence on the pathobiology of mucositis. Support Care Cancer 21(11):3233–3234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riley P, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, Littlewood A, Clarkson JE, McCabe MG (2015) Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD0115

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo TMB, O’Ryan F (2014) American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(10):1938–1956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schuurhuis JM, Stokman MA, Witjes MJ, Dijkstra PU, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK (2015) Evidence supporting pre-radiation elimination of oral foci of infection in head and neck cancer patients to prevent oral sequelae. A systematic review. Oral Oncol 51(3):212–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Epstein JB, Parker IR, Epstein MS, Gupta A, Kutis S, Witkowski DM (2007) A survey of National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers’ oral health supportive care practices and resources in the USA. Support Care Cancer 15(4):357–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohrn KE, Wahlin YB, Sjoden PO, Wahlin AC (1996) Indications for and referrals to oral care for cancer patients in a county hospital. Acta Oncol 35(6):743–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilberg P, Hjermstad MJ, Ottesen S, Herlofson BB (2014) Chemotherapy-associated oral sequelae in patients with cancers outside the head and neck region. J Pain Symptom Manag 48(6):1060–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lalla RV, Bowen J, Barasch A, Elting L, Epstein J, Keefe DM, et al. (2014) MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer 120(10):1453–1461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gamper EM, Zabernigg A, Wintner LM, Giesinger JM, Oberguggenberger A, Kemmler G, et al. (2012) Coming to your senses: detecting taste and smell alterations in chemotherapy patients. A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag 44(6):880–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hjermstad MJ, Bergenmar M, Fisher SE, Montel S, Nicolatou-Galitis O, Raber-Durlacher J, et al. (2012) The EORTC QLQ-OH17: a supplementary module to the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessment of oral health and quality of life in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 48(14):2203–2211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376 (http://groups.eortc.be/QoL/questionnaires_qlqc30.htm)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DeWolf L, Koller M, Velikova G, Jokovic A, Scott N, Bottomley A (2009) EORTC quality of life group translation procedure, 3rd edn. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life, Brussels ISBN 978–2–930064-38-3

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson C, Aaronson N, Blazeby J, Bottomley A, Fayers P, Koller M, et al. (2011) Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules, 4th edn. EORTC Quality of Life Group, Brussels ISBN 978–2–930064-413

    Google Scholar 

  30. Karnofsky D, Abelmann W, Craver L, Burchenal J (1948) The use of nitrogen mustard in the palliative treatment of cancer. Cancer 1(4):634–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Streiner DL, Norman GR (2003) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pallant JF, Tennant A (2007) An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol 46(Pt 1):1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith EV Jr (2002) Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 3(2):205–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tollesson E, Jenssen AB, Razavi D, Maher EJ, et al. (1994) Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck patients. Acta Oncol 33:879–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vivat B, Young T, Efficace F, Sigurdardottir V, Arraras JI, Asgeirsdottir GH, et al. (2013) Cross-cultural development of the EORTC QLQ-SWB36: a stand-alone measure of spiritual wellbeing for palliative care patients with cancer. Palliat Med 5:457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sodergren SC, White A, Efficace F, Sprangers M, Fitzsimmons D, Bottomley A, et al. (2014) Systematic review of the side effects associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 91(1):35–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wheelwright S, Darlington AS, Fitzsimmons D, Fayers P, Arraras JI, Bonnetain F, et al. (2013) International validation of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 questionnaire for assessment of health-related quality of life elderly patients with cancer. Br J Cancer 109(4):852–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hulis CA, Sabbatini P, et al. (2015) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34(6):557–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project received financial support from the EORTC Quality of Life Group (QLG) Grant No. 001/2012. We express our gratitude to the EORTC QLG Executive Committee for reviewing and approving the phase IV module development report and manuscript.

Special thanks are also given to the study coordinators at the participating centers and the patients who took part in the study, and to Cand. odont. Petter Wilberg for valuable advice in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne J. Hjermstad.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial support

This study was supported by Grant No. 001/2012 from the EORTC Quality of Life Group.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hjermstad, M.J., Bergenmar, M., Bjordal, K. et al. International field testing of the psychometric properties of an EORTC quality of life module for oral health: the EORTC QLQ-OH15. Support Care Cancer 24, 3915–3924 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3216-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3216-0

Keywords

Navigation