Abstract
Under visual guidance normal subjects usually misbisect radial lines farther than the true midpoint (distal bias). We investigated whether this distal bias is constant across the peripersonal space or it varies by varying the distance of the stimulus from the subject. Subjects were asked to bisect radial lines presented below eye level either in the near or far peripersonal space. The results showed an increase of distal bias in the far-space. This finding suggests that the influence of spatial factors on bisection of radial lines is not constant across the peripersonal space. Distal bias increases as a function of the distance of the stimulus from the subject, according to a spatiotopic processing scheme.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair JC, Williamson DJ, Jacobs DH, Na DL, Heilman KM (1995) Neglect of radial and vertical space: importance of the retinotopic reference frame. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 58:724–728
Bisiach E, Vallar G (1988) Hemineglect in humans. In: Boller F, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 1. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 195–222
Bisiach E, Bulgarelli C, Sterzi R, Vallar G (1983) Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain Cogn 2:32–38
Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Nathan G, Wilson L (1985) Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 23:421–425
Bradshaw JL, Nathan G, Nettleton NC, Wilson L, Pierson J (1987) Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection? Neuropsychologia 25:735–738
Butter CM, Evans J, Kirsh N, Kewman D (1989) Altitudinal neglect following traumatic brain injury: a case report. Cortex 25:135–146
Chewning J, Adair JC, Heilman EB, Heilman KM (1998) Attentional bias in normal subjects performing visual and tactile radial line bisections. Neuropsychologia 36:1097–1101
Chieffi S (1996) Effects of stimulus asymmetry on line bisection. Neurology 47:1004–1008
Chieffi S (1999) Influence of perceptual factors on line bisection. Cortex 35:523–536
Fraisse P, Ehrlich S, Vurpillot E (1956) Études de la centration perceptive par la méthode tachistoscopique. Arch de Psychol 35:193–214
Geldmacher DS, Heilman KM (1994) Visual field influence on radial line bisection. Brain Cogn 26:65–72
Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1993) The bisection of horizontal and radial lines: a case study of normal controls and ten patients with left visuospatial neglect. Int J Neurosci 70:149–67
Heilman KM, Valenstein E (1979) Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 5:166–170
Manning L, Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1990) Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 28:647–655
Masin S (2003) Test of the effect of attention on judged length of a line. Percept Mot Skills 96:599–606
Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Bradshaw JA (1995) The effects of unilateral visuospatial neglect on perception of Müller–Lyer illusory figures. Perception 24:415–433
Mennemeier M, Wertman E, Heilman KM (1992) Neglect of near peripersonal space. Brain 115:37–50
Mesulam MM (1981) A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 10:309–325
Previc FH (1990) Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav Brain Sci 13:519–557
Prinzmetal W, Wilson A (1997) The effect of attention on phenomenal length. Perception 26:193–205
Rapcsak SZ, Cimino CR, Heilman KM (1988) Altitudinal neglect. Neurology 38:277–281
Rizzolatti G, Berti A (1990) Neglect as a neural representation deficit. Rev Neurol 146:626–634
Scarisbrick DJ, Tweedy JR, Kuslansky G (1987) Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection. Neuropsychologia 25:695–699
Shelton PA, Bowers D, Heilman KM (1990) Peripersonal and vertical neglect. Brain 113:191–205
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chieffi, S., Iavarone, A. & Carlomagno, S. Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines. Exp Brain Res 189, 129–132 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1458-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1458-x