[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a new technology that fabricates a three-dimensional (3D) physical model from computer-aided design (CAD) data using an additive process, rapid prototyping (RP) has been developed to reduce product development time and cost. Recently, many newly emerging techniques of RP have been commercialized worldwide. This paper deals with the selection of an optimal RP system that best suits the end use of a part by using multiple-attribute decision making and the test part designed with conjoint analysis to reflect users’ preference. Evaluation factors include only the major attributes that significantly affect the performance of an RP system such as accuracy, roughness, strength, elongation, part cost and build time. Crisp values such as accuracy and surface roughness are obtained with a new test part developed in this study. The part cost and build time are identified as falling within approximate ranges due to varying costs and many variable parameters. They are presented as linguistic values that can be described with triangular fuzzy numbers. Based on the evaluation values obtained, an appropriate RP process for a specific part application can be selected using a modified technique of order preference by a similarity to ideal solution (TOPIS) method given crisp data and linguistic variables as the alternatives of attributes. Finally, each attribute’s weight is assigned using a pairwise comparison matrix. Determined using these weights, the final ranking order aids in the selection of the RP system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams RE, Komaragiri SN, Melton VL, Bishu RR (1996) Investigation of the effect of various build methods on the performance of rapid prototyping (stereolithography). J Mater Proc Technol 61:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tiwari MK, Banerjee R (2001) A decision support system for the selection of a casting process using analytic hierarchy process. Prod Plan Control 12:689–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillipson DK (1997) Rapid prototyping machine selection program. The 6th European conference on rapid prototyping and manufacturing, Nottingham, UK, 1997, pp 292–303

  4. Bibb R (1999) The development of a rapid prototyping selection system for small companies. Thesis, School of Product Design and Engineering, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff

  5. Bauer J, Klingenberg HH, Müller H (1996) Computer based rapid prototyping system selection and support. Proceedings of time compression technologies conference, The Heritage Motor Center, Gaydon, UK, 1996, pp 241–250

  6. Masood SH, Soo A (2002) A rule based expert system for rapid prototyping system selection. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Togerson WS (1958) Theory and methods of scaling. Wiley, New York

  8. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision-making – methods and applications, a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  9. Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making – methods and application. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  10. Zimmermann HJ (1999) Practical application of fuzzy technologies. Kluwer, Boston Dordrecht London

  11. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its application. Kluwer, Boston Dordrecht London

  13. Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1991) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and application. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deng H, Yeh CH, Robert JW (2000) Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res 27:963–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision-making: an Introduction. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social science, 07-104. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

  16. Mikhailov L (2000) A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. J Oper Res Soc 51:341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty TL (1990) Multicriteria decision-making: the analytic hierarchy process. RWS PWS, Pittsburgh

  18. Paul EG, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J Mark 54:3–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.H. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byun, H., Lee, K. A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 1338–1347 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2099-2

Keywords